High-Rise Building Definition, Development, and Use
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Read Where Architecture Expert Paul Goldberg Comments on the History of New York's Famous Skyscrapers. As You Do So, Complete
Can you identify any of these buildings? What do they all have in common? Which one do you like best? Read where architecture expert Paul Goldberg comments on the history of New York’s famous skyscrapers. As you do so, complete the following tasks: · In New York buildings are not only buildings, they become ___________________ · New York took over Chicago as regards skyscrapers in ___________________. · The Woolworth building was the tallest building worldwide for _________________. · The _______________ defined the Manhattan skyline. · They are trying to keep a memory of the people who were lost and also to show New York’s ______________________________. · New York stands out from the other cities as the embodiment of ____________________. Woolworth Building; Empire State Building; Chrysler Building; Flatiron; Hearst Tower The Woolworth Building, at 57 stories (floors), is one of the oldest—and one of the most famous—skyscrapers in New York City. It was the world’s tallest building for 17 years. More than 95 years after its construction, it is still one of the fifty tallest buildings in the United States as well as one of the twenty tallest buildings in New York City. The building is a National Historic Landmark, having been listed in 1966. The Empire State Building is a 102-story landmark Art Deco skyscraper in New York City at the intersection of Fifth Avenue and West 34th Street. Like many New York building, it has become seen as a work of art. Its name is derived from the nickname for New York, The Empire State. It stood as the world's tallest building for more than 40 years, from its completion in 1931 until construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower was completed in 1972. -
Pittsfield Building 55 E
LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Pittsfield Building 55 E. Washington Preliminary Landmarkrecommendation approved by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, December 12, 2001 CITY OFCHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Departmentof Planning and Developement Alicia Mazur Berg, Commissioner Cover: On the right, the Pittsfield Building, as seen from Michigan Avenue, looking west. The Pittsfield Building's trademark is its interior lobbies and atrium, seen in the upper and lower left. In the center, an advertisement announcing the building's construction and leasing, c. 1927. Above: The Pittsfield Building, located at 55 E. Washington Street, is a 38-story steel-frame skyscraper with a rectangular 21-story base that covers the entire building lot-approximately 162 feet on Washington Street and 120 feet on Wabash Avenue. The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. It is responsible for recommending to the City Council that individual buildings, sites, objects, or entire districts be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. The Comm ission is staffed by the Chicago Department of Planning and Development, 33 N. LaSalle St., Room 1600, Chicago, IL 60602; (312-744-3200) phone; (312 744-2958) TTY; (312-744-9 140) fax; web site, http ://www.cityofchicago.org/ landmarks. This Preliminary Summary ofInformation is subject to possible revision and amendment during the designation proceedings. Only language contained within the designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF INFORMATION SUBMITIED TO THE COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS IN DECEMBER 2001 PITTSFIELD BUILDING 55 E. -
RITZ TOWER, 465 Park Avenue (Aka 461-465 Park Avenue, and 101East5t11 Street), Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission October 29, 2002, Designation List 340 LP-2118 RITZ TOWER, 465 Park Avenue (aka 461-465 Park Avenue, and 101East5T11 Street), Manhattan. Built 1925-27; Emery Roth, architect, with Thomas Hastings. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1312, Lot 70. On July 16, 2002 the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Ritz Tower, and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No.2). The hearing had been advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Ross Moscowitz, representing the owners of the cooperative spoke in opposition to designation. At the time of designation, he took no position. Mark Levine, from the Jamestown Group, representing the owners of the commercial space, took no position on designation at the public hearing. Bill Higgins represented these owners at the time of designation and spoke in favor. Three witnesses testified in favor of designation, including representatives of State Senator Liz Kruger, the Landmarks Conservancy and the Historic Districts Council. In addition, the Commission has received letters in support of designation from Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, from Community Board Five, and from architectural hi storian, John Kriskiewicz. There was also one letter from a building resident opposed to designation. Summary The Ritz Tower Apartment Hotel was constructed in 1925 at the premier crossroads of New York's Upper East Side, the comer of 57t11 Street and Park A venue, where the exclusive shops and artistic enterprises of 57t11 Street met apartment buildings of ever-increasing height and luxury on Park Avenue. -
CHRYSLER BUILDING, 405 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission September 12. 1978~ Designation List 118 LP-0992 CHRYSLER BUILDING, 405 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1928- 1930; architect William Van Alen. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1297, Lot 23. On March 14, 1978, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a_public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Chrysler Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 12). The item was again heard on May 9, 1978 (Item No. 3) and July 11, 1978 (Item No. 1). All hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Thirteen witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were two speakers in opposition to designation. The Commission has received many letters and communications supporting designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Chrysler Building, a stunning statement in the Art Deco style by architect William Van Alen, embodies the romantic essence of the New York City skyscraper. Built in 1928-30 for Walter P. Chrysler of the Chrysler Corporation, it was "dedicated to world commerce and industry."! The tallest building in the world when completed in 1930, it stood proudly on the New York skyline as a personal symbol of Walter Chrysler and the strength of his corporation. History of Construction The Chrysler Building had its beginnings in an office building project for William H. Reynolds, a real-estate developer and promoter and former New York State senator. Reynolds had acquired a long-term lease in 1921 on a parcel of property at Lexington Avenue and 42nd Street owned by the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art. -
National Register of Historic Places
NFSForm 10-900 (7-81) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Tourtellotte and Hummel Architecture>in 2. Location N_/A- not for publication city, town N/A N/A_ vicinity of state code ' county N/A code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum building(s) private X unoccupied X commercial park . structure x both work in progress X educational _ X_ private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible X entertainment x religious object N/A jn process yes: restricted X government scientific X Thematic N^A_ being considered X yes: unrestricted industrial transportation Group no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Multiple owners (see individual inventory sheets) city, town N/A N/A vicinity of 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Multiple (see individual inventory sheets) N/A N/A state Idaho 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Idaho State Historic Sites Survey has this property been determined eligible? __yes _X_ no 1972 date . federal X state county local depository for survey records Idaho State Historical Society city, town Boise state Idaho 7. Description Condition N/A Check one N/A check one N/A excellent deteriorated unaltered original site good ruins altered moved date N/A fair unexposed See Individual Inventory forms. Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The unifying theme of this nomination is the design of all structures included in it by members of the Boise-based architectural firm of John E. -
True to the City's Teeming Nature, a New Breed of Multi-Family High Rises
BY MEI ANNE FOO MAY 14, 2016 True to the city’s teeming nature, a new breed of multi-family high rises is fast cropping up around New York – changing the face of this famous urban jungle forever. New York will always be known as the land of many towers. From early iconic Art Deco splendours such as the Empire State Building and the Chrysler Building, to the newest symbol of resilience found in the One World Trade Center, there is no other city that can top the Big Apple’s supreme skyline. Except itself. Tall projects have been proposed and built in sizeable numbers over recent years. The unprecedented boom has been mostly marked by a rise in tall luxury residential constructions, where prior to the completion of One57 in 2014, there were less than a handful of super-tall skyscrapers in New York. Now, there are four being developed along the same street as One57 alone. Billionaire.com picks the city’s most outstanding multi-family high rises on the concrete horizon. 111 Murray Street This luxury residential tower developed by Fisher Brothers and Witkoff will soon soar some 800ft above Manhattan’s Tribeca neighborhood. Renderings of the condominium showcase a curved rectangular silhouette that looks almost round, slightly unfolding at the highest floors like a flared glass. The modern design is from Kohn Pedersen Fox. An A-team of visionaries has also been roped in for the project, including David Mann for it residence interiors; David Rockwell for amenities and public spaces and Edmund Hollander for landscape architecture. -
National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1
NFS Form 10-900 (3-82) OMB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use only National Register of Historic Places received MAY 6 19ST Inventory—Nomination Form date entered JUN | 5 [937 See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic N/A Number of contributing features: 20 Portland Thirteenth Avenue and or common Historic District Number of non-contributing features: 0 2. Location A six-block-long corridor of warehouse properties fronting on NW 13th street & number Avenue, between NW Davis Street on the south and Jl/Anot for publication NW Johnson Street on the north city, town Portland ___ J/Avicinity of Third Congressional District state Oregon code 41 county Multnomah code 051 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use JC_ district public _X _ occupied agriculture museum building(s) _ X_ private unoccupied _X — commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object N/A in process yes: restricted _ government scientific X industrial N/A being considered -X _ "noyes: unrestricted transportation military name Multiple (see Continuation Sheets) street & number N/A city, town N/A vicinity of state 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Multnomah County Courthouse street & number 1021 SW 4th Avenue city, town Portland state Oregon 97204 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Portland Historic title Rpsnurr.p Inventory has this property been determined eligible? yes X no date federal state county _X_ local depository for survey records Portland Bureau nf P1anning 3 11?n SU 5th Avenue city, town Portland state Oregon Q7?n4 7. -
Monthly Market Report
MAY 2017 Monthly Market Report SALES SUMMARY .......................... 2 HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE ....... 4 NEW DEVELOPMENTS ................... 2 5 NOTABLE NEW LISTINGS .............. 4 6 SNAPSHOT ...................................... 7 7 8 CityRealty is the website for NYC real estate, providing high-quality listings and tailored agent matching for pro- spective apartment buyers, as well as in-depth analysis of the New York real estate market. MONTHLY MARKET REPORT MAY 2017 Summary MOST EXPENSIVE SALES The average sales price and number of Manhattan apartment sales both increased in the four weeks leading up to April 1. The average price for an apartment—taking into account both condo and co-op sales—was $2.3 million, up from $2.2 million the prior month. The number of recorded sales, 817, was up from the 789 recorded in the preceding month. AVERAGE SALES PRICE CONDOS AND CO-OPS $65.1M 432 Park Avenue, #83 $2.3 Million 6+ Beds, 6+ Baths Approx. 8,055 ft2 ($8,090/ft2) The average price of a condo was $3.6 million and the average price of a co-op was $1.2 million. There were 389 condo sales and 428 co-op sales. RESIDENTIAL SALES 817 $1.9B UNITS GROSS SALES The top sale this month was in 432 Park Avenue. Unit 83 in the property sold for $65 million. The apartment, one of the largest in 432 Park, has six+ bedrooms, six+ bathrooms, and measures 8,055 square feet. $43.9M 443 Greenwich Street, #PHH The second most expensive sale this month was in the recent Tribeca condo conversion at 5 Beds, 6+ Baths 443 Greenwich Street. -
Building Up: What Are London's Limits?
Building Up Contents Building Up: What are London's limits? 01 Is London falling short on tall buildings? In the first of our ‘Building Up’ series, we look at some of the key challenges to 03 Dame Judith Hackitt’s review following delivering taller developments in the capital. With pressure for growth and land the Grenfell fire: the final values at record levels in certain areas, property experts are seeking innovative report ways to deliver high quality developments at increased densities. In this 04 Whose light is it anyway? Releasing publication, we go beyond the typical issues of planning, construction and lettings rights of light reaches the High to look at the specific issues that come with building up. Court 06 Love thy neighbour: starting your Charles Russell Speechlys cohosted a panel discussion with GIA on ‘London's development on the right foot skyline and the challenges of building up’ on 5 June 2018. At the seminar, we 08 Branding your Building (before drew together industry insight from our panel of experts from across development, someone else does) planning, politics and law and through live polling of our audience of leading 10 The only way is up? How new national professionals working within the real estate sector. This gave us an indepth planning policy will increase understanding of this topic from different perspectives in the market. pressure on building height and density If you have any questions on this publication, please get in touch with 12 About Charles Russell Speechlys Claire Fallows on [email protected] or James Souter on [email protected] with any questions. -
CITYLAND NEW FILINGS & DECISIONS | July 2020
CITYLAND NEW FILINGS & DECISIONS | July 2020 Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure was suspended and there were no scheduled City Planning Commission public hearings in July 2020. City Planning re-convened for the first time on August 3, 2020 at a virtual review session. CITY PLANNING PIPELINE New Applications Filed with DCP — July 1 to July 31, 2020 APPLICANT PROJECT/ADDRESS DESCRIPTION ULURP NO. REPRESENTATIVE ZONING TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS McDonald’s 606 Neptune Avenue A zoning map amendment from an R6/C1-2 zoning district and the M 210034 LDK; Langan Corporation Special Ocean Parkway District (OP) to R6/C2-4/OP and a modification 210033 ZMK to the Legal Document (Restrictive Declaration) to facilitate 4,249 sf of commercial development, including the legalization of an existing accessory drive through facility, is being sought by McDonald’s Corporation a private applicant at 606 Neptune Avenue in Coney Island, Community District 13, Brooklyn. Almonte Lincoln Sutter Avenue Rezoning This is a private application by Almonte Lincoln LLC requesting a zoning 210031 ZMK; Lisa Orrantia LLC map amendment to change from R5 to R6A/C2-4 and a zoning text 210032 ZRK amendment to designate the rezoned area as a MIH, to facilitate the development of a 5-story building with ground floor commercial and 28 residential units, located at 1377-1385 Sutter Avenue in CD 5, East New York, Brooklyn. Damien Smith Broadway and 11th A Zoning Map Amendment (from R5 to M1-4/R7A) and zoning text 210025 ZMQ; Frank St. Jacques Street Rezoning amendments (to ZR 123-90 and Appendix F) to facilitate a new eight- 210026 ZRQ story, mixed use development, including approximately 217 residential units and 30,000 square feet for commercial and manufacturing uses, is being sought by 11 St & Broadway LLC at 11-01 33rd Avenue in Astoria, Community District 1, Queens. -
“Skyscraper” Poem How Did Carl Sandburg Capture the Spirit of a Skyscraper in a Poem?
th 8 Grade Language Arts ILS—1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B “Skyscraper” Poem How did Carl Sandburg capture the spirit of a skyscraper in a poem? Theme Vocabulary This lesson explores how language can bring an object to life. The lesson assumes caissons watertight chambers used that students have a basic working knowledge of poems and poetry terminology. in construction work under water or It can be used within teaching units on architectural vocabulary, poetry, writing, as a foundation reading, or dramatic interpretation. girders main horizontal structural members that carry a vertical load; Student Objectives similar to a beam, but usually more • retell the story of Sandburg’s poem structurally important • describe the author and his connections to Chicago mortar the building material made • recognize literary devices found in the poem from cement, sand, and water that is applied between bricks and hardens Activities to form a strong connection • illustrate the story that the poem tells pilings long slender columns • (usually of timber, steel, or reinforced Grade Language Arts identify Sandburg’s use of literary devices th concrete) driven into the ground to 8 Type carry a vertical load indoor, desktop activities architect a person who designs and 409 oversees the construction of buildings Timeframe mason a skilled laborer who builds three class sessions of 30 minutes each with stone or bricks hod carrier a laborer hired to Materials carry supplies to bricklayers, • Handout A - copy of Carl Sandburg’s poem “Skyscraper” stonemasons, cement finishers, • Handout B - worksheet for identifying poetry terms in “Skyscraper” or plasterers on the job “Skyscraper” Poem • Handouts C and D - five photographs of historic Chicago skyscrapers and a tier a floor or a story of a building photo of Sandburg • large sheets of drawing paper, pencils, crayons, markers See Handout B for poetry vocabulary. -
Fuller Building, First Floor Interior
~.a!'..dr:iarks Prese~"VCl.tion Corrunission March :s, :986; ~esigr..ation List 184 ~-;:l-:.46: FU~~~~ 3v:~~:NG, fi~st floo:::' interior co!.1sisting of the 57th Street e:1trance vestibule, the !'-~adison Avenue entra."lce vesti';:)u2.e, the lobby, and tne e .... evator lobby; and the fixtures and interior co::tpo!:.ents of these spaces, including but not limited to, wall surfaces, ceiling su.rfaces, floor su.:::'faces, doors, elevator doors, mailbox, directory boards, ve!.1t grilles, light fixtures and or:'1.a:::.e:1tal r.e·a.::. pane.::.s; 593-599 Madison Avenue a/k/a 41 East 57th Street, Ma.J..~at~a"l. Built .:928-29; architects, Walke~ x Gillette. La-.;.d'nar!z Site: 3orougl:. of ~a.;1->.attan Taz Map Block 1293, Lot 26. On Septe:.1be: 13, :983, the Landmarks !?:eservation Co'Tunissio:::. he.:'..d a nublic hearing on t!:.e ;iroposed designation as an Interior Landmark of the Fuller Building, first floor interior consisting of the 57th Street entra!.1ce vestibule, the Madiso~ Avenue entra.~ce vestibule, the lobby, a"ld the elevator lobby; a!ld t!le f ixtt:!es a::!.d inte!'ior components of these spaces, including but ::ot limited to, wall surfaces, ceiling surfaces, floor surfaces, doors, elevator doors, rr:a.:..:.·oox, directory boa:::'as, vent grill es, l igb..+ f i:·:tU'..'.'es and ornamental metal panels; and the prorJosed designation of the related Land.nark Site ( ::::tem No . .:s). ':'!le hearing was contin....:.ec to Xove:~°:Je:" 15, .:983 (:te?:i No. 4). 3oth !'lea.rings had been duly advertised in accordance with the prov isio:s o-: :.ah'.