DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 1St MGL SALE.Xlsx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 1St MGL SALE.Xlsx LEYBURN LIVESTOCK AUCTION MART FRIDAY 21ST SEPTEMBER 2018 Sale at 10.00 am in catalogue order with Mule lambs followed by Continentals FIRST ANNUAL SPECIAL SHOW & SALE FOR GIMMER (EWE) LAMBS COMPRISING 1480 MULE GIMMER LAMBS ON BEHALF OF THE NORTH OF ENGLAND MULE SHEEP ASSOCIATION. 160 CONTINENTAL GIMMER LAMBS Sponsors: Mule Lambs: REETH GARAGE LTD; BARCLAYS BANK, NEMSA MIDGLEY MOTORS, SKIPTON & VICKY ANDERSON TRAINING, NORTHALLERTON Continental Lambs: DUGDALE NUTRITION NEMSA HAWES BRANCH - TROPHY FOR THE BEST RUN OF NEMSA LAMBS MULE AWARDS: 1st Prize £75 Prize Money, Nemsa Rosette, The Ambrose Holmes Trophy & the KW Alternative Feeds Tankard 2nd Prize £40 3rd Prize £20 4th Prize £10 Judging for pens of ten in each class to commence at 9.00am Judges:- Mule Lambs: Abe Dent, Walden & Robert Wilson, Darlington Continental Judge - David Ford, Arrathorne ALL SHEEP TO HAVE BEEN TREATED WITH SCAB APPROVED PRODUCT PRIOR TO SALE KEY: FA - * Farm Assured P - Vaccinated once for Pneumonia O - * Scratched for Orf P2 - Vaccinated twice for Pneumonia Order of sale: The ballot being drawn by Mr George Sledge, Leyburn PEN ORDER OF SALE UK No FA O P NUMBER MULE GIMMER LAMBS 30A-30C T & ME JACKSON Grewelthorpe 124207 * P2 70 30D/1-2 GH & J WALLIS & SON Marske 122353 * * P2 100 3 R & J MYERS Bransdale 122063 * * P2 40 4-7 H & EM TIPLADY Walden 122537 * * P2 140 8-9A JW & AC BANKS & SON Bishopdale 122540 * * P2 50 9B-10 JT DIXON & SON Barden 122453 * * P2 70 11-12 WALBURN HALL FARMS Downholme 122452 * * BRAV 2 90 13-14A J ALLISON & SONS Arkengarthdale 122268 * * P2 60 Continued overleaf PEN ORDER OF SALE UK No FA O P NUMBER 14B-17 TW ATKINSON & SON Gammersgill 122558 * * P2 140 18-19 WC PORTER & SON Reeth 122412 * * P2 60 20-21 R & AR HUNTER Redmire 122719 * * P2 40 22-23 GK HIRD & SONS Whashton 138560 * * P2 50 24-26 DA & MAM BROWN Agglethorpe 122585 * * P2 80 27-28 REC SIMPSON & SONS Marske 122355 * * COV X2 40 33-34 AL DAWES Colsterdale 123875 * * P2 40 35-37 R & PR BANKS & SON Walden 122540 * * P2 60 38-44 RW WALLIS & SONS Marske 122357 * * P2 150 45-46 RA BUSBY & SON Marrick 122337 * * BRAV X2 50 47-49 J DUFFUS & SON East Witton 122592 * * P2 100 50-51 C GREGG Ellingstring 122601 P2 50 CONTINENTAL GIMMER LAMBS 68 EDWARD BROWN Agglethorpe Zwart * * P2 10 69-71 PAGE FARM ENTERPRISE Rookwith Texel * ½ & ¾ bred 50 71-75 BECKHILL FARMS Scorton Texel x Cheviot Mule 100 * * P2 FRIDAY 28TH SEPTEMBER Second Mule, Continential & Suffolk Shearling Sale Breeding Ewes & Rams of all Breeds Store Lambs ********** FRIDAY EVENING 28TH SEPTEMBER Annual Show & Sale of Swaledale Breeding Ewes, Shearlings & Gimmer Lambs ********* THURSDAY 4TH OCTOBER Annual Show & Sale of Teeswater Sheep On behalf of the Teeswater Sheep Breeders Association ******** FRIDAY 5TH OCTOBER Second Show & Sale of Mule & Continential Gimmer Lambs & other Breeding Sheep Monthly Dairy Sale LEYBURN AUCTION MART RICHMOND ROAD, LEYBURN, NORTH YORKSHIRE, DL8 5DP email: [email protected] web: leyburnauctions.com Stephen Walker 07866 358130.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heritage at Risk Register
    CASTLE HOWARD MAUSOLEUM Castle Howard Estate, Ryedale, North Yorkshire The Mausoleum, by Hawksmoor, 1729-42, and modelled on the tomb of Metella, is a major feature of the Howardian Hills. Situated on a bluff east of Castle Howard. The columns were repaired with a grant in the 1980s. The entablature and bastions continue to decay. Much of the damage is due to rusting cramps. The staircase balustrade is collapsing. 304 HERITAGE AT RISK YORKSHIRE & THE HUMBER 305 Y&H HERITAGE AT RISK 2008 Of the 176 entries on the baseline 1999 Yorkshire and the Humber buildings at risk register, 91(52%) have now been removed. Although this is 6% higher than the regional average for 2008, our rate of progress is slowing. Of the five entries removed this year, only one was on the 1999 register. This is because the core of buildings remaining from the 1999 register are either scheduled monuments with no obvious use, or buildings with a problematic future that require a strategic re-think to provide a viable solution. Despite these problems, we are continuing to work with owners, local authorities, trusts and other funding bodies to try to secure the long-term future of these buildings and structures. Just over half (52%) of the regional grants budget (almost £500,000) was offered to eleven buildings at risk in the last financial year. There are four new entries this year: in North Yorkshire, St Leonard’s Church at Sand Hutton, and in West Yorkshire, Hopton Congregational Church in Mirfield,Westwood Mills at Linthwaite, and Stank Hall near Leeds.This gives a total of 122 Grade I and II* listed buildings and scheduled monuments at risk entries on the Yorkshire and the Humber register.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Parking Charges for the Station, Richmond Swimming
    CAR PARKING CHARGES FOR THE STATION, RICHMOND SWIMMING POOL AND GYM CUSTOMERS ARE ON THE WAY; HOWEVER, YOU CAN MAKE THEM FAIRER IF YOU ACT IMMEDIATELY BY EXPRESSING YOUR VIEWS Richmondshire District Council is proposing to introduce car parking charges in The Station Yard Car Park this spring. We understand that the ticket machines have been ordered . This car park is currently used by customers of The Station, Richmond Swimming Pool and Liberty Gym. All of these buildings and the activities which take place in them are organised and maintained through the efforts of two local volunteer-led charities: The Station – Is operated by The Richmondshire Building Preservation Trust The Pool and Gym – Are operated by the Richmond Leisure Trust If you regularly use these ‘much loved’ charity-run-facilities , and choose to park your vehicle in the council owned Station Yard Car Park, you will shortly be charged for your visit. The charities that operate these facilities believe that what is being proposed will have an immediate and detrimental impact on these community amenities which are run on a ‘not-for profit’ basis - and could ultimately force them to close. The local authority appear to have little or no relevant research on which to justify their position. Your help is needed NOW to ensure that the views of people like you, who value The Station, pool and gym, to make your voices heard on this critical issue by writing to or phoning your district councillor, if you live in Richmondshire or writing to the head of the local authority if you don't.
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Banks Adambottom Farm, West Burton, North Yorkshire, DL8 4UL I
    Karen Banks From: Grace Maddan <[email protected]> Sent: 05 February 2021 10:01 To: Andrew Bishop; Planning; [email protected]; localplan Subject: Planning Application R/85/514/GDO Adambottom Farm, West Burton, North Yorkshire, DL8 4UL I object to the proposed mast at West Scrafton on visual impact grounds. Grace Maddan 1 Karen Banks From: Humphrey Maddan <[email protected]> Sent: 05 February 2021 08:47 To: Planning; Andrew Bishop; [email protected]; localplan Subject: Planning application R/85/514/GDO Adambottom farm West Burton Leyburn DL8 4UL Dear Planners, I strongly object to the proposed mast at West Scrafton. I think there are many reasons why it is unwise to accept 5G modernisation at the cost of the world class Yorkshire Dales. Here are a few: 1) Economically - the business cases I've viewed about the benefits to do with IoT does simply not stack up in having a meaningful benefit to our communities. Faster internet yes - see next point: 2) Technically - fibre optic would be hugely preferable as a solution to faster internet - due to speed and precision with no visual collateral. 3) Aesthetically - I would hope that individuals responsible for stewarding the Yorkshire Dales are conscious of how rare a landscape they are able to either preserve or change. 4)Environmentally - I think the effect on pollinators and species (not to mention humans) seems to be relatively unquantified. Therefore in light of the other areas, there is no reason to bring this risk to our community. I realise that it must be a hard decision - but please scrutinise your motives in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire and the Humber Region, Tanner Row, York Y01 6WP Telephone: 01904 601979 Fax: 01904 601999 Email: [email protected]
    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 200820 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 ContentsKey to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER HERITAGE AT RISK IN YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
    [Show full text]
  • Framlington Longhorsley Lowick Matfen Middleton Milfield Netherton Netherwitton N° L 82 / 70 Journal Officiel Des Communautés Européennes 26
    26 . 3 . 84 Journal officiel des Communautés européennes N° L 82 / 67 DIRECTIVE DU CONSEIL du 28 février 1984 relative à la liste communautaire des zones agricoles défavorisées au sens de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE ( Royaume-Uni ) ( 84 / 169 / CEE ) LE CONSEIL DES COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES , considérant que les indices suivants , relatifs à la pré­ sence de terres peu productives visée à l'article 3 para­ graphe 4 point a ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été retenus pour la détermination de chacune des zones en vu le traité instituant la Communauté économique question : part de la superficie herbagère par rapport à européenne, la superficie agricole utile supérieure à 70 % , densité animale inférieure à l'unité de gros bétail ( UGB ) à l'hectare fourrager et montants des fermages ne dépas­ sant pas 65 % de la moyenne nationale ; vu la directive 75 / 268 / CEE du Conseil , du 28 avril 1975 , sur l'agriculture de montagne et de certaines zones défavorisées ( 2 ), modifiée en dernier lieu par la directive 82 / 786 / CEE ( 2 ), et notamment son article 2 considérant que les résultats économiques des exploi­ tations sensiblement inférieurs à la moyenne , visés paragraphe 2 , à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point b ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été démontrés par le fait que le revenu du travail ne dépasse pas 80 % de la moyenne vu la proposition de la Commission , nationale ; considérant que , pour établir la faible densité de la vu l'avis de l'Assemblée ( 3 ), population visée à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point c ) de la directive 75
    [Show full text]
  • Richmondshire District Council Does Not Currently Meet the Criteria for Electoral Inequality Ie
    District Ward Boundary Review Richmondshire District Council Stage One - Council Size Submission to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (April 2017) 1 Introduction The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) is an independent body that is responsible for conducting boundary and electoral reviews of principal authorities in England. Richmondshire District Council does not currently meet the criteria for electoral inequality ie. 30% of wards having a variance greater than +/- 10% of the average electorate per Member, however this threshold is likely to be reached in the very near future. As a result the Council decided in July 2016 to request the LGBCE to undertake an electoral review. This request was accepted and the review was included in their programme. The electoral review will examine whether the boundaries of wards within the local authority area need to be altered to ensure fair representation at the local government elections. In Richmondshire it has been identified that six of the twenty four wards have imbalances. The table below sets out the current imbalances in the District. No (%) Number of wards (>10%) 5 Number of wards (>20%) 0 Number of wards (>30%) 1 The Wards with the above variances are: (%) Brompton-on-Swale & Scorton 11% Hipswell 12% Hornby Castle 29% Middleton Tyas -14% Scotton -12% Swaledale -11% The main reasons for the electoral inequality arises from new housing developments, under registration of service personnel and population changes, the detail of which will be explained in the following sections. North Yorkshire County Council is not within the LGBCE programme for review and the County Council have indicated they will not be requesting a review of the County Divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Est.'', Was Buried at Rokeby on the 10Th of the Dale, Griff Mill, Wensley Mill (Still Operat- Depended Upon
    4 943. Weinesiay. November 106, 1941. THE TEESDALE MERCURY, 6 ers got the full returns—vi., flour, bran and offals. hi those days oatmeal formed a great THE WAYSIDE PULPIT DALE5MAN'S SCRAPBOOK portion of the people's food. It is recalled that an old woman used to say : " I went BY IIEG. PARKIN. at Rokeby, 28th December, 1624, so would be to Leyburn and bout a bowl o' co-on on mi The historical side of it all : A LOCAL VICAR OF THE a minor at the time of his succession to the urn a-courd an' paid fee it a-foo-and " (" Many hundreds of years ago (how time Manor. went to Leyburn and bought a howl of corn flies) there lived a village craftsman who was respected for charitableness and the 171" CENTURY . The notes which Mr Parish gives in the on my own accord, and paid far it before- heginiiing of the brief book enables us to hand"). setting of honour before personal interests. Reverting. to " Old Nod," after 87 years' He had a precocious, young, first-born son THE REV. WILLIAM PARISH. form a fairly accurate picture of the place service. war-limp regulations put it "out of who was always asking questions, and .1 VIOAR OF ROKEBY, at that time. The Gothic-looking Manor House on the south and the village green fashion " 0 few years ago. ,t.", was once WilOPAI he was quietly proud. The place stree.hing away to. the Church and Vicarage offered for it •or museum purposes, and might have been any Teesdale village.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Easter
    REETH AND DISTRICT GAZETTE LTD ISSUE NO. 286 APRIL 2020 Happy Easter Your local news magazine for the Two Dales. PRICELESS REETH AND DISTRICT GAZETTE LTD attempt, the Archduke stopped at the Time & Time Again town hall and after delivering a speech was meant to continue with the planned I am reading ‘Time & Time Again’ by motorcade, along the same route. ‘Ben Elton’. Excellent fun and very easy General Potiorek who was part of to read. It raises the question if you the motorcade decided, as a could go back in time, where would you precaution, that they would take an choose to go to ? alternative route away from the city I am sure we have all considered centre. He passed this message to his this many a time and the obvious aide who passed it on to the chief of answer such as, ‘I would go-back and police. Unfortunately this guy then kick Hitler in the nut’ (note not plural) will be many a common answer. Often I had thought I would like to go back to prevent cruelty to the defenceless or go back to prevent disasters such as Aberfan, Titanic, Zeebrugge ferry, Hindenburg etc. Ben Elton’s book’s answer is for the protagonist to go back to June 28, 1914 in Sarajevo, to stop the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Thus removing the catalyst for World War I and subsequently World War II. I learnt from this book the forgot to pass the message on to the sequence of extraordinary events that motorcade drivers. So the motorcade led to the success of the assassination.
    [Show full text]
  • 5276 the London Gazette, July 22, 1910
    5276 THE LONDON GAZETTE, JULY 22, 1910. District where they are moved through such Swale, Warlaby, Newby Wiske, North Ottering- District by railway from a place outside such ton, Romanby, Northallerton, Cotcliffe. Crosby, District to another place outside such District Thornton le Beans, Borrowby, and Knayton with without unnecessary delay and without th Brawith, in the administrative county of the North animals being untrucked within such District. Riding of Yorkshire j and also comprising :— The petty sessional divisions of Claro. Ripon Local Authority to enforce Order. Liberty (including its detached part), and Kirkby Malzeard, the boroughs of Harrogate and Ripon, 2. The provisions of this Order shall be and the parishes of Stainburn, Lindley, Clifton executed and enforced by the Local Authority. with Norwood, Timble Little, Timble Great, Fewston, Blubberhouses, Thruscross, Hazlewood Offences. with Storiths, Bolton Abbey, Barden, Appletree- wick, Hartlington, Hebden, Burnsall, Thorpe, 3.—(1) If an animal is moved in contravention the lands common to the parishes of Burnsall of this Order, the owner of the animal, and the and Thorpe, Cracoe, Linton, Grassington, Thresh- person for the time being in charge thereof, anc field, Conistone with Kilnsey, and Kettlewell the person causing, directing, or permitting the with Starbottom, in the administrative county of movement, and the person moving or conveying the West Riding of Yorkshire. the animal, and the consignee or other person receiving or keeping it, knowing it to have been moved in contravention as aforesaid, and the occupier of the place from which the animal is moved, shall, each according to and in respect oi Copies of the above Order can be obtained on his own acts and defaults, be deemed guilty of application to the Secretary, Board of Agriculture an offence against the Diseases of Animals and Fisheries, 4, Whitehall Place, London, S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Areas
    List of Areas 1 Member of Parliament 79 Parish/Town Councils/Parish Meetings 1 Police, Fire & Crime Commissioner 25 Parish Meetings 6 County Councillors 54 Parish/Town Councils 24 District Councillors 335 Parish/Town Councillors 34 Parish/Town Council 170 5 Councillors 4 Parish/Town Council 24 6 Councillors 6 Parish/Town Council 42 7 Councillors 2 Parish/Town Council 16 8 Councillors 4 Parish/Town Council 36 9 Councillors 1 Parish/Town Council 10 10 Councillors 2 Parish/Town Council 22 11 Councillors 1 Parish/Town Council 15 15 Councillors 335 1 Parliamentary Constituency Richmond (Yorks) (1) (MP area) 1 Police, Fire & Crime Commissioner North Yorkshire (1) 6 Electoral Divisions Catterick Bridge (1) (County Councillor Areas) Central Richmondshire (1) Middle Dales (1) Richmond (1) Richmondshire North (1) Upper Dales (1) 16 District Wards Catterick & Brompton-on- Hipswell (2) Middleham (1) (District Councillor Areas) Swale(3) Leyburn (2) Richmond East (1) Colburn (2) Lower Swaledale & Arkengarthdale Richmond North (1) Croft & Middleton Tyas (2) (1) Richmond West (2) Gilling West (1) Lower Wensleydale (1) Scotton (2) Hawes, High Abbotside & Melsonby (1) Yoredale (1) Upper Swaledale (1) 79 Parish/Town Councils/Meetings 4 Town Councils 50 Parish Councils 25 Parish Meetings 2 Town Councils (single) 41Parish Councils (single) 24 Parish Meetings (single) 2 Town Council (3 Wards) 9 Grouped Parish Councils (29 1 Grouped Parish Meeting (3 Parishes) Parishes) 101 Parishes 1 Akebar 35 Easby 69 Muker 2 Aldbrough 36 East Hauxwell 70 New Forest 3 Appleton
    [Show full text]
  • Chainsaw Sculptures
    Editorial certainly in flux. As our 1960s plantations are felled, some are replanted with a better Someone could probably tell us why they variety of hardwood; that’s good for sing ‘Abide with me’ at the cup final; we wildlife and aesthetically pleasing; grants don’t know, but there’s one line “Change mean that gills can be planted with native and decay in all around I see”, and species; that’s good.. The schemes to re- presumably the writer wasn’t referring to generate the heather on the fells are making his teeth! So then, ‘Change and decay’; a ‘right mess’ on the tops; we’ll have to would you say that was true for our area? hope that in due course the heather will Visitors think it’s the same here as it’s grow and the trenching will be smoothed always been and certainly change which out. Fewer sheep on the tops means a big does go on is relatively slow and often change; the undergrowth is deeper and far blends in well. The question is, whether harder to trudge through! Not that that will changes intended to improve the quality of trouble too many! Lower down, walls life and the environment really do so. tumble and are sometimes replaced with Take ‘signs’; it is always good to display unsightly bits of wires or fences; but many information – of events to come, business farmers are keen to wall the gaps; that’s new or old, or public information – but good. let’s face it, some are pretty scruffy and Footpaths and stiles decay.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashgill Cottage, Tupgill Park, Coverham
    Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority Application Code: R/60/7H Committee Date: 10/12/2019 Location: Ashgill Cottage, Tupgill Park, Coverham Ashgill Spring Sinks Issues Pond Dam Spring Drain Thorngill Cottage Thorngill Archway Cottage Statue Statue Pond Tupgill Park Statue GP Tupgill Park Tank Ashgill Spring Sinks Issues Pond Dam Spring Drain Sinks Thorngill Cottage Thorngill Archway Cottage Sinks Statue Statue R/60/7HR/60/7H Pond Tupgill Park Statue Issues GP Pond Dam Tupgill Park Ppg Sta Tank FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. NO FURTHER COPIES TO BE MADE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100023740. Additional information: © Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority Schedule No:7 Application No: R/60/7H District: Richmondshire Parish: Coverham with Agglethorpe Applicant's Name: Mr C Armstrong, Grid Ref: SE09598665 Received by YDNP: 11/04/2019 Officer: Andrew Bishop PROPOSAL: full planning permission for demolition of existing dwelling and erection of replacement building to provide 3 no. self catering holiday units together with car parking and ancillary works LOCATION: Ashgill Cottage, Tupgill Park, Coverham CONSULTEES Coverham-w- No comments received. Agglethorpe PM Middleham TC Council does not object to the works themselves but does have concerns about the inevitable increased traffic levels through Middleham and past the Low Moor racehorse training gallops. These roads are narrow and the surfaces deteriorate rapidly. Council believes that a road impact assessment should be undertaken. Council has previously requested that a strategic plan of future developments at Tupgill Park would be helpful when considering individual applications. Middleham Ward No comments received. NYCC - Area 1 No objection on highway grounds.
    [Show full text]