DOCSLIB.ORG

Ashgill Cottage, Tupgill Park, Coverham

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ashgill Cottage, Tupgill Park, Coverham Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority Application Code: R/60/7H Committee Date: 10/12/2019 Location: Ashgill Cottage, Tupgill Park, Coverham Ashgill Spring Sinks Issues Pond Dam Spring Drain Thorngill Cottage Thorngill Archway Cottage Statue Statue Pond Tupgill Park Statue GP Tupgill Park Tank Ashgill Spring Sinks Issues Pond Dam Spring Drain Sinks Thorngill Cottage Thorngill Archway Cottage Sinks Statue Statue R/60/7HR/60/7H Pond Tupgill Park Statue Issues GP Pond Dam Tupgill Park Ppg Sta Tank FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. NO FURTHER COPIES TO BE MADE © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100023740. Additional information: © Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority Schedule No:7 Application No: R/60/7H District: Richmondshire Parish: Coverham with Agglethorpe Applicant's Name: Mr C Armstrong, Grid Ref: SE09598665 Received by YDNP: 11/04/2019 Officer: Andrew Bishop PROPOSAL: full planning permission for demolition of existing dwelling and erection of replacement building to provide 3 no. self catering holiday units together with car parking and ancillary works LOCATION: Ashgill Cottage, Tupgill Park, Coverham CONSULTEES Coverham-w- No comments received. Agglethorpe PM Middleham TC Council does not object to the works themselves but does have concerns about the inevitable increased traffic levels through Middleham and past the Low Moor racehorse training gallops. These roads are narrow and the surfaces deteriorate rapidly. Council believes that a road impact assessment should be undertaken. Council has previously requested that a strategic plan of future developments at Tupgill Park would be helpful when considering individual applications. Middleham Ward No comments received. NYCC - Area 1 No objection on highway grounds. Richmond Highway Depot North Yorkshire No comments received. Building Control Fire & Rescue Service Insufficient detail to determine if it meets the Building Regulations. Wildlife Conservation No objection. Officer Area Ranger (Lower PROW indirectly affected. Wensleydale) Senior Listed Building No objection subject to recording. Officer PUBLIC RESPONSES None to date. R/60/7H 10 Dec 2019 Schedule No:7 RELEVANT PLANNING POLICIES C5(15) - Replacement Dwellings L1(15) - Heritage assets T5(15) - Indoor visitor facilities W1(15) - Wildlife sites, species and networks W2(15) - Biodiversity enhancement BE1(15) - Business development sites BE2(15) - Rural land-based enterprise SP1(15) - Presumption in favour of Sustainable Development SP2(15) - National Park Purposes SP3(15) - Spatial Strategy SP4(15) - Development Quality OFFICER OBSERVATIONS REASON FOR COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION This application is reported to the Planning Committee for the following reason: in the opinion of the Head of Development Management it is in the best interests of the Authority that the application is considered by the Planning Committee. APPLICATION SITE The application site is a stone built dwellinghouse and its garden located at the Ashgill building group of racehorse and equestrian buildings within the Tupgill Estate. The Ashgill building group stands on the hillside some 270m to the north of the Forbidden Corner visitor attractions and Tupgill House. The building group is separated by woodlands from the visitor facilities at the Forbidden Corner and Tupgill House. The hillside to the north restricts any longer distance views of Ashgill House from that direction. Access to the site is via the main entrance and private drive serving the whole Tupgill Estate, which is also a public right of way. The western gable end of Ashgill Cottage adjoins the main internal estate road from the Forbidden Corner. This road divides the Ashgill building group into two. The vacant Ashgill Cottage and unused modern stable and equestrian buildings are on the roads eastern side. To the west are ranges of stables and residential dwellings. The front of Ashgill Cottage faces south onto its garden which is enclosed by woodland. Attached to the rear of the house are domestic outshots and wings including one containing an office and stables. Ashgill Cottage was last occupied in 2017 by a racehorse owner/trainer. PROPOSAL The application is for planning permission to demolish the existing dwelling and erect a replacement building containing 3 self catering holiday units with associated car parking and ancillary works. The proposed building would be erected slightly further down the hillside on what is currently a lawn to the private side of the existing house. The proposed two-storey building would be constructed of natural stone and slate with uPVC windows. It would take the form of a double ridged house to which has been added a side extension. Part of the footprint of the existing house would be used to create 7 car parking spaces for the occupants of the new units. R/60/7H 10 Dec 2019 Schedule No:7 RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY Planning permission was granted in 1998 (R/60/7A) for alterations and an extension to Ashgill Cottage. This also included the erection of two detached blocks of racing stables and alterations and extensions to the existing stables at the rear and side of the house. One of the two blocks of loose boxes at the rear of Ashgill Cottage approved in 1998 is the subject of another current and undetermined application for change of use and conversion into two staff accommodation units with parking and ancillary works (R/60/7J). A previous application for the demolition of Ashgill Cottage and the erection of a replacement building to provide 4 no. self-catering holiday units together with parking and ancillary works was withdrawn in June 2018 (R/60/7G). KEY ISSUES -principle of the development -impact on character and appearance of the countryside -residential amenity and privacy -public rights of way -highway safety -impact on wildlife -parish council comments PRINCIPLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT The proposal is to demolish a traditional dwellinghouse and redevelop the site by the erection of a building containing 3 units of living accommodation for use as short term holiday lets. The holiday accommodation would be used in support of the Forbidden Corner visitor attractions. The first consideration is therefore the heritage significance of the demolition of the traditional house followed by a consideration of the redevelopment of the site for holiday units. Demolition of existing house Local Plan policy L1 – Heritage assets states that before a traditional building can be demolished an assessment has to be made of its heritage significance. The house is not a listed building and there are none in the Ashgill building group. Parts of Ashgill Cottage are believed to date back to the C18, although it was re-fronted in the later C18 or early C19. The age and stone construction of Ashgill Cottage mean that it has a degree of heritage significance, but that is not of equivalent value to a listed building. The proposed demolition of the house would result in the total loss of the building. The test for development is therefore whether “reasonable efforts have been made to minimise harm”. This approach would accord with that of the National Planning Policy Framework’s at paragraph 197 which states: “197. The effect of an application on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset should be taken into account in determining the application. In weighing applications that directly or indirectly affect non-designated heritage assets, a balanced judgement will be required having regard to the scale of any harm or loss and the significance of the heritage asset.” The demolition of the house is proposed due to the poor state of the building. The application is accompanied by a Structural Report by a firm of consultant engineers and quantity surveyors. They found that the rear of the house is built into the higher ground R/60/7H 10 Dec 2019 Schedule No:7 causing drainage issues and high dampness throughout the house. They consider the shallow foundations to be insufficient to support the house on the moist clay ground below. The roofs are sagging and in poor condition such that the timbers would need to be replaced and the chimneys rebuilt. They consider that there are issues with the construction of walls which have moved causing leaning and bowing in numerous places. There is significant cracking in three locations on the front elevation alone. The floor joists are undersized and have poor bearing onto the walls, meaning that all floors would need taking up and replacing. Cracked lintels over windows and doors would need to be replaced. The whole house would need to be re-rendered and fitted with a damp course. Such major works would be required to bring the property back into a usable condition that very little of the existing structure would remain. Even if it were practical to shore up and retain some of the walling the end result would be classified as a rebuild, rather than a restoration of the existing house. The heritage significance of the existing building would therefore have been lost. The costs involved in trying to retain some of the building and the necessary site works to address the damp issues would be uneconomical when compared to a total rebuild. A justifiable case has therefore been made to allow the demolition of the existing house. The existing house structure can be recorded for the Historic database and this can be required by a condition. The stone can also be recycled by being reused in the replacement building. Erection of holiday units The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF 2019) sets out the purpose
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Garden View Flat, Brecongill, Coverham Rent
    Hawes 01969 667744 Bentham 01524 262044 Leyburn 01969 622936 Settle 01729 825311 www.jrhopper.com Market Place, Leyburn London 02074 098451 North Yorkshire DL8 5BD [email protected] “Lets Rent In The Dales” 01969 622936 Garden View Flat, Brecongill, Coverham Middleham Rent: £75.00 PW Deposit: £250.00 Admin Fee: £100.00 First Floor Bedsit Fully Furnished Rural Stable Yard Setting Parking Kitchenette & Ensuite Council Tax & Water Shower Room Rates Included in Rent RESIDENTIAL SALES • LETTINGS • COMMERCIAL • PROPERTY CONSULTANCY Valuations, Surveys, Planning, Commercial & Business Transfers, Acquisitions, Conveyancing, Mortgage & Investment Advice, Inheritance Planning, Property, Antique & Household Auctions, Removals J. R. Hopper & Co. is a trading name for J. R. Hopper & Co. (Property Services) Ltd. Registered: England No. 3438347. Registe red Office: Hall House, Woodhall, DL8 3LB. Directors: L. B. Carlisle, E. J. Carlisle Garden View Flat, Brecongill , Coverham, Middleham DESCRIPTION Garden View is a first floor bedsit situated in a rural racehorse training yard on Coverham moor. Garden View is perfect for some peace and quiet with fantastic walks all around. Although peaceful the property is still accessible with local towns of Leyburn & Middleham just 4 miles away housing a variety of shops, pubs and restaurants, schools and medical facilities. Previously being part of the main house the bedsit offers a kitchenette/bedroom with ensuite shower room. The Council tax and water charges are included in the rent. BEDSIT First floor bedsit with kitchenette and sleeping area and ensuite shower room. PARKING Parking available in the yard. Garden View Flat, Brecongill , Coverham, Middleham GENERAL Photographs Items in these photographs may not be included in the tenancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register
    CASTLE HOWARD MAUSOLEUM Castle Howard Estate, Ryedale, North Yorkshire The Mausoleum, by Hawksmoor, 1729-42, and modelled on the tomb of Metella, is a major feature of the Howardian Hills. Situated on a bluff east of Castle Howard. The columns were repaired with a grant in the 1980s. The entablature and bastions continue to decay. Much of the damage is due to rusting cramps. The staircase balustrade is collapsing. 304 HERITAGE AT RISK YORKSHIRE & THE HUMBER 305 Y&H HERITAGE AT RISK 2008 Of the 176 entries on the baseline 1999 Yorkshire and the Humber buildings at risk register, 91(52%) have now been removed. Although this is 6% higher than the regional average for 2008, our rate of progress is slowing. Of the five entries removed this year, only one was on the 1999 register. This is because the core of buildings remaining from the 1999 register are either scheduled monuments with no obvious use, or buildings with a problematic future that require a strategic re-think to provide a viable solution. Despite these problems, we are continuing to work with owners, local authorities, trusts and other funding bodies to try to secure the long-term future of these buildings and structures. Just over half (52%) of the regional grants budget (almost £500,000) was offered to eleven buildings at risk in the last financial year. There are four new entries this year: in North Yorkshire, St Leonard’s Church at Sand Hutton, and in West Yorkshire, Hopton Congregational Church in Mirfield,Westwood Mills at Linthwaite, and Stank Hall near Leeds.This gives a total of 122 Grade I and II* listed buildings and scheduled monuments at risk entries on the Yorkshire and the Humber register.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2016 Butchered Bones, Carved Stones: Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England Shawn Hale Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in History at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Hale, Shawn, "Butchered Bones, Carved Stones: Hunting and Social Change in Late Saxon England" (2016). Masters Theses. 2418. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2418 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Graduate School� EASTERNILLINOIS UNIVERSITY " Thesis Maintenance and Reproduction Certificate FOR: Graduate Candidates Completing Theses in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree Graduate Faculty Advisors Directing the Theses RE: Preservation, Reproduction, and Distribution of Thesis Research Preserving, reproducing, and distributing thesis research is an important part of Booth Library's responsibility to provide access to scholarship. In order to further this goal, Booth Library makes all graduate theses completed as part of a degree program at Eastern Illinois University available for personal study, research, and other not-for-profit educational purposes. Under 17 U.S.C. § 108, the library may reproduce and distribute a copy without infringing on copyright; however, professional courtesy dictates that permission be requested from the author before doing so. Your signatures affirm the following: • The graduate candidate is the author of this thesis. • The graduate candidate retains the copyright and intellectual property rights associated with the original research, creative activity, and intellectual or artistic content of the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Parking Charges for the Station, Richmond Swimming
    CAR PARKING CHARGES FOR THE STATION, RICHMOND SWIMMING POOL AND GYM CUSTOMERS ARE ON THE WAY; HOWEVER, YOU CAN MAKE THEM FAIRER IF YOU ACT IMMEDIATELY BY EXPRESSING YOUR VIEWS Richmondshire District Council is proposing to introduce car parking charges in The Station Yard Car Park this spring. We understand that the ticket machines have been ordered . This car park is currently used by customers of The Station, Richmond Swimming Pool and Liberty Gym. All of these buildings and the activities which take place in them are organised and maintained through the efforts of two local volunteer-led charities: The Station – Is operated by The Richmondshire Building Preservation Trust The Pool and Gym – Are operated by the Richmond Leisure Trust If you regularly use these ‘much loved’ charity-run-facilities , and choose to park your vehicle in the council owned Station Yard Car Park, you will shortly be charged for your visit. The charities that operate these facilities believe that what is being proposed will have an immediate and detrimental impact on these community amenities which are run on a ‘not-for profit’ basis - and could ultimately force them to close. The local authority appear to have little or no relevant research on which to justify their position. Your help is needed NOW to ensure that the views of people like you, who value The Station, pool and gym, to make your voices heard on this critical issue by writing to or phoning your district councillor, if you live in Richmondshire or writing to the head of the local authority if you don't.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverdale and Wensleydale
    The Kiplings of Coverdale and Wensleydale In 1570, the chancery patent rolls record a “pardon for John Kipling of Scrafton, County York, and Reginald Kiplinge of Hudswell for all treasons, rebellions, etc committed between 1st November 11 Elizabeth and the 31st January following on reports of their penitence for their part in the Rebellion of the North testified before Commissioners of the Queen”. (West) Scrafton is in the parish of Coverham in Coverdale, which is itself a branch of Wensleydale. In 1592, John Kipling died and a commission was issued to Thomas Stevenson, the curate of Coverham, to administer an oath to his widow, Ann, to administer his estate. Unfortunately, Coverham parish records only survive from 1707, so nothing is known of the family after this until, in 1673, a Thomas Kipling paid tax on one hearth at West Scrafton. Thomas Kipling died in 1691 and his son John was appointed administrator. An inventory was prepared, showing limited possessions but £20 in bills and bonds. John married Ruth Stoney in 1706, as the following licence and register entry show. 1706 East Witton Widow Jane Kipling of West Scrafton died in 1709. She left all her estate to her own (Thompson) family apart from nominal legacies to two Kipling relatives. It’s unclear exactly how Thomas, his son John, Jane and the two Johns she names relate to each other. In 1737 there was a bill in chancery (C11/365/26 Coates v Kipling) by the Dean of Middleham against… .. (Braithwaite being slightly lower down Coverdale than West Scrafton in the parish of East Witton) for non-payment of tythes in respect of crops gathered and animals pastured on land.
    [Show full text]
  • Swaledale & Arkengarthdale
    Swaledale & Arkengarthdale The two far northern dales, with their The River Swale is one of England’s fastest industry, but in many places you will see iconic farming landscape of field barns and rising spate rivers, rushing its way between the dramatic remains of the former drystone walls, are the perfect place to Thwaite, Muker, Reeth and Richmond. leadmining industry. Find out more about retreat from a busy world and relax. local life at the Swaledale Museum in Reeth. On the moors you’re likely to see the At the head of Swaledale is the tiny village hardy Swaledale sheep, key to the Also in Reeth are great shops showcasing of Keld - you can explore its history at the livelihood of many Dales farmers - and the local photography and arts and crafts: Keld Countryside & Heritage Centre. This logo for the Yorkshire Dales National Park; stunning images at Scenic View Gallery and is the crossing point of the Coast to Coast in the valleys, tranquil hay meadows, at dramatic sculptures at Graculus, as well as Walk and the Pennine Way long distance their best in the early summer months. exciting new artists cooperative, Fleece. footpaths, and one end of the newest It is hard to believe these calm pastures Further up the valley in Muker is cosy cycle route, the Swale Trail (read more and wild moors were ever a site for Swaledale Woollens and the Old School about this on page 10). Gallery. The glorious wildflower meadows of Muker If you want to get active, why not learn navigation with one of the companies in the area that offer training courses or take to the hills on two wheels with Dales Bike Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Banks Adambottom Farm, West Burton, North Yorkshire, DL8 4UL I
    Karen Banks From: Grace Maddan <[email protected]> Sent: 05 February 2021 10:01 To: Andrew Bishop; Planning; [email protected]; localplan Subject: Planning Application R/85/514/GDO Adambottom Farm, West Burton, North Yorkshire, DL8 4UL I object to the proposed mast at West Scrafton on visual impact grounds. Grace Maddan 1 Karen Banks From: Humphrey Maddan <[email protected]> Sent: 05 February 2021 08:47 To: Planning; Andrew Bishop; [email protected]; localplan Subject: Planning application R/85/514/GDO Adambottom farm West Burton Leyburn DL8 4UL Dear Planners, I strongly object to the proposed mast at West Scrafton. I think there are many reasons why it is unwise to accept 5G modernisation at the cost of the world class Yorkshire Dales. Here are a few: 1) Economically - the business cases I've viewed about the benefits to do with IoT does simply not stack up in having a meaningful benefit to our communities. Faster internet yes - see next point: 2) Technically - fibre optic would be hugely preferable as a solution to faster internet - due to speed and precision with no visual collateral. 3) Aesthetically - I would hope that individuals responsible for stewarding the Yorkshire Dales are conscious of how rare a landscape they are able to either preserve or change. 4)Environmentally - I think the effect on pollinators and species (not to mention humans) seems to be relatively unquantified. Therefore in light of the other areas, there is no reason to bring this risk to our community. I realise that it must be a hard decision - but please scrutinise your motives in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport System of Medieval England and Wales
    THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF MEDIEVAL ENGLAND AND WALES - A GEOGRAPHICAL SYNTHESIS by James Frederick Edwards M.Sc., Dip.Eng.,C.Eng.,M.I.Mech.E., LRCATS A Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford Department of Geography 1987 1. CONTENTS Page, List of Tables iv List of Figures A Note on References Acknowledgements ix Abstract xi PART ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter One: Setting Out 2 Chapter Two: Previous Research 11 PART TWO THE MEDIEVAL ROAD NETWORK 28 Introduction 29 Chapter Three: Cartographic Evidence 31 Chapter Four: The Evidence of Royal Itineraries 47 Chapter Five: Premonstratensian Itineraries from 62 Titchfield Abbey Chapter Six: The Significance of the Titchfield 74 Abbey Itineraries Chapter Seven: Some Further Evidence 89 Chapter Eight: The Basic Medieval Road Network 99 Conclusions 11? Page PART THREE THr NAVIGABLE MEDIEVAL WATERWAYS 115 Introduction 116 Chapter Hine: The Rivers of Horth-Fastern England 122 Chapter Ten: The Rivers of Yorkshire 142 Chapter Eleven: The Trent and the other Rivers of 180 Central Eastern England Chapter Twelve: The Rivers of the Fens 212 Chapter Thirteen: The Rivers of the Coast of East Anglia 238 Chapter Fourteen: The River Thames and Its Tributaries 265 Chapter Fifteen: The Rivers of the South Coast of England 298 Chapter Sixteen: The Rivers of South-Western England 315 Chapter Seventeen: The River Severn and Its Tributaries 330 Chapter Eighteen: The Rivers of Wales 348 Chapter Nineteen: The Rivers of North-Western England 362 Chapter Twenty: The Navigable Rivers of
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire and the Humber Region, Tanner Row, York Y01 6WP Telephone: 01904 601979 Fax: 01904 601999 Email: [email protected]
    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 200820 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 ContentsKey to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER HERITAGE AT RISK IN YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Yorkshire Dales Access Forum to Be Held on Tuesday 15 June 2010 1.15Pm at Yoredale, Bainbridge
    Meeting of the Yorkshire Dales Access Forum To be held on Tuesday 15 June 2010 1.15pm at Yoredale, Bainbridge Meeting to Commence at 1.15pm 1. Welcome 2. Apologies 3. Approval of minutes, and matters arising (not on the agenda) 4. Public Question time – three minutes per speaker (those wishing to speak should make themselves known to the Secretary at the start of the meeting or in advance of the meeting) 5. Future Forum Meetings - Agenda Items - Dates 6. Survey of Landowners and Managers 7. North Yorkshire Local Transport Plan 8. Public Rights of Way Annual Report 2009/10 (will be circulated at the meeting) 9. Signing of ‘other routes with public access’ 10. Report back from Advisory Groups: Access on Foot Advisory Group Bridleways and Restricted Byways Advisory Group Yorkshire Dales Green Lanes Advisory Group 11. Secretary’s Report (Items for note and consideration by Forum Members) 12. Update on members’ activities (Brief reports of activities relating to the Forum) Unapproved Minutes Annual General Meeting of the Yorkshire Dales Local Access Forum Held on Tuesday 23 February 2010 Yoredale, Bainbridge Present: Michael Bartholomew (MB) – Chair, David Bartlett (DB), Andrew Colley (AC), David Gibson (DG), Neil Heseltine (NH), Guy Keating (GK), Michael Kenyon (MK), Robert Mayo (RM), Ken Miller (KM), Stuart Monk (SM), Jerry Pearlman (JP), Malcolm Petyt (MP), Mike Stephenson (MS), Alistair Thompson (AT), Pat Whelan (PWh), Phillip Woodyer (PW). YDNPA Officers present: Alan Hulme (AH), Rachel Briggs (RB) – LAF Secretary, Kathryn Beardmore (KB), Jon Avison (JA), Meghann Hull (MH). The meeting started at 1.15pm. 1. Election of Chair and Vice Chair JA began the meeting by explaining the process for election of Chair.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Draft Proposals
    Comments on Draft Proposals Ward Comments LGBCE figures Changes due to (2023) comments (2023) 1 Bolton Castle • Include Caldbergh, Coverham and West Scrafton parishes which are Electorate Electorate proposed to be in Leyburn Ward (section 8) in Bolton Castle Ward. 1,658 1,480 o These three parishes share many interests, identities and issues with three other parishes (Carlton Highdale, Carlton Town and Electors per Cllr Electors per Cllr Melmerby) which are included in Bolton Castle Ward. 1,658 1,480 o Coverham, Caldbergh, Melmerby, East Scrafton, West Scrafton, Carlton, Gammersgill, Fleensop, Horsehouse, Arkleside, Woodale, Variance from Variance from Braidly are all linked community wise as Coverdale. average average o At the last review Carlton Highdale & Carlton Town had been split 4% -7% from them due to electoral equality, not on community links. o Whilst not a recognised consideration, the current proposals would cause an administrative issue for elections due to the number of available and accessible venues in the area that can be used as polling stations, thereby removing access to voting for electors. The two available are Coverdale Memorial Hall situated in Carlton Town and Horsehouse Village Hall which is situated in Carlton Highdale. o Caldbergh, Carlton Highdale, Carlton Town, Coverham, Melmerby and West Scrafton parishes all currently vote at Coverdale Memorial Hall. • Remove Bellerby from Bolton Castle Ward and include in Leyburn Ward (section 8). 2 Catterick & • Include Uckerby, currently proposed to be in Croft Ward (section 4) in Electorate Electorate Brompton-on- the Catterick & Brompton-on-Swale Ward. 4,948 5,008 Swale o Uckerby has close community links, interests, identities and issues with the parishes of Scorton, Bolton-on-Swale and Ellerton-on- Electors per Cllr Electors per Cllr Swale.
    [Show full text]