Newsletter August 2018 Email: [email protected] Website
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Inventory of Taxa for the Fitzgerald River National Park
Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park 2013 Damien Rathbone Department of Environment and Conservation, South Coast Region, 120 Albany Hwy, Albany, 6330. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposed, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. However, the author and participating bodies take no responsibiliy for how this informrion is used subsequently by other and accepts no liability for a third parties use or reliance upon this report. CITATION Rathbone, DA. (2013) Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park. Unpublished report. Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank many people that provided valable assistance and input into the project. Sarah Barrett, Anita Barnett, Karen Rusten, Deon Utber, Sarah Comer, Charlotte Mueller, Jason Peters, Roger Cunningham, Chris Rathbone, Carol Ebbett and Janet Newell provided assisstance with fieldwork. Carol Wilkins, Rachel Meissner, Juliet Wege, Barbara Rye, Mike Hislop, Cate Tauss, Rob Davis, Greg Keighery, Nathan McQuoid and Marco Rossetto assissted with plant identification. Coralie Hortin, Karin Baker and many other members of the Albany Wildflower society helped with vouchering of plant specimens. 2 Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. -
Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae Based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa
Systematic Botany (2010), 35(2): pp. 425–441 © Copyright 2010 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa David C. Tank 1,2,3 and Michael J. Donoghue 1 1 Peabody Museum of Natural History & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P. O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 U. S. A. 2 Department of Forest Resources & Stillinger Herbarium, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, P. O. Box 441133, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133 U. S. A. 3 Author for correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Javier Francisco-Ortega Abstract— Previous attempts to resolve relationships among the primary lineages of Campanulidae (e.g. Apiales, Asterales, Dipsacales) have mostly been unconvincing, and the placement of a number of smaller groups (e.g. Bruniaceae, Columelliaceae, Escalloniaceae) remains uncertain. Here we build on a recent analysis of an incomplete data set that was assembled from the literature for a set of 50 campanulid taxa. To this data set we first added newly generated DNA sequence data for the same set of genes and taxa. Second, we sequenced three additional cpDNA coding regions (ca. 8,000 bp) for the same set of 50 campanulid taxa. Finally, we assembled the most comprehensive sample of cam- panulid diversity to date, including ca. 17,000 bp of cpDNA for 122 campanulid taxa and five outgroups. Simply filling in missing data in the 50-taxon data set (rendering it 94% complete) resulted in a topology that was similar to earlier studies, but with little additional resolution or confidence. -
Le Micro-Endémisme Dans Un Hotspot De Biodiversité
! Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie Ecole Doctorale du Pacifique (ED 469) Laboratoire Insulaire du Vivant et de l’Environnement THESE Présentée par Adrien WULFF Pour obtenir le grade de Docteur en Sciences de l’Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie Spécialité : Physiologie et Biologie des Organismes – Populations - Interactions Le micro-endémisme dans un hotspot de biodiversité : approche globale sur la flore vasculaire de la Nouvelle- Calédonie et analyse comparative au sein du genre Scaevola Soutenue publiquement le 27 avril 2012 devant le jury composé de : Kingsley Dixon Professor, Kings Park and Botanic Garden of Perth Rapporteur Thierry Dutoit Professeur, Université d’Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse Rapporteur Pete Hollingsworth Professor, Royal Botanical Garden of Edinburgh Examinateur Hamid Amir Professeur, Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie Examinateur Bruno Fogliani Chercheur HDR, Institut Agronomique néo-Calédonien Directeur de thèse Laurent L’Huillier Chercheur, Institut Agronomique néo-Calédonien Co-encadrant de thèse ! ! Résumé Les milieux naturels de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Hotspot de biodiversité, ont subi de nombreuses dégradations par l’action simultanée de différentes menaces telles que les incendies, les extractions minières, l’urbanisation et l’introduction d’espèces envahissantes. A cela s’ajouteront probablement à court terme les impacts des changements climatiques. Afin de proposer un consensus entre la nécessité de protéger cette importante biodiversité néo-calédonienne et l’accroissement rapide des activités anthropiques à l’origine de ces menaces, une étude comprenant une approche à une échelle macroscopique et une approche comparative de la flore micro-endémique est proposée. La première s’attache à appréhender le micro-endémisme sur l’ensemble de la flore vasculaire du territoire. -
Utilizing Next-Generation Sequencing to Resolve the Backbone of the Core Goodeniaceae and Inform Future Taxonomic and Floral
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94 (2016) 605–617 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Utilizing next-generation sequencing to resolve the backbone of the Core Goodeniaceae and inform future taxonomic and floral form studies q ⇑ Andrew G. Gardner a, ,1, Emily B. Sessa b,c,1, Pryce Michener a, Eden Johnson a, Kelly A. Shepherd d, Dianella G. Howarth e, Rachel S. Jabaily a a Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN 38112, USA b Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA c Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA d Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Parks and Wildlife, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia e Department of Biological Sciences, St. John’s University, Queens, NY 11439, USA article info abstract Article history: Though considerable progress has been made in inferring phylogenetic relationships of many plant lin- Received 16 April 2015 eages, deep unresolved nodes remain a common problem that can impact downstream efforts, including Revised 18 September 2015 taxonomic decision-making and character reconstruction. The Core Goodeniaceae is a group affected by Accepted 2 October 2015 this issue: data from the plastid regions trnL-trnF and matK have been insufficient to generate adequate Available online 20 October 2015 support at key nodes along the backbone of the phylogeny. We performed genome skimming for 24 taxa representing major clades within Core Goodeniaceae. The plastome coding regions (CDS) and nuclear Keywords: ribosomal repeats (NRR) were assembled and complemented with additional accessions sequenced for Backbone topology nuclear G3PDH and plastid trnL-trnF and matk. -
Species List
SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) - All Vascular Plant Taxa Paul Gioia, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife Report generated on 22/06/2016 11:17:17 AM This analysis uses the SWAFR boundary generated from a site classification analysis by Hopper & Gioia (2004). Data for this report were derived from a snapshot taken from WAHERB on 18/05/2015 for Gioia & Hopper (2016) paper. Criteria for data extraction and analysis were: 1. All vascular plants 2. Species-rank names where the typical subspecies also existed were renamed to the typical subspecies to avoid counting duplicate taxa 3. All vascular plant taxa with current names, including weeds Note: 1. This report contains information generated from intersecting the supplied polygon layer LOCAL_SWFHG04 with the point species occurrence layer WAHERB_FILT_ALL. 2. Endemism is calculated based on the records available to this analysis and is not necessarily authoritative. Regions reported on: Region Name Hectares SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) 29,954,654.4 1 2 3 1 2 3 NameID Species Cons End WA NameID Species Cons End WA 39 14049 Acacia aprica T Y Y SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) 40 37260 Acacia aptaneura 1 4889 Abutilon cryptopetalum 41 14050 Acacia arcuatilis P2 Y Y 2 19708 *Abutilon grandifolium Y 42 3221 Acacia argutifolia P4 Y 3 4902 Abutilon oxycarpum 43 14051 Acacia aristulata T Y Y 4 43020 Abutilon oxycarpum subsp. Prostrate (A.A. Y 44 12248 Acacia ascendens P2 Y Mitchell PRP 1266) 45 14052 Acacia asepala P2 Y 5 4903 *Abutilon theophrasti Y 46 3225 Acacia ashbyae 6 16106 Acacia acanthaster Y 47 15467 Acacia assimilis subsp. -
Appendix 5 Mattiske Flora and Vegetation Assessment
A1. APPENDIX A1: STATE DEFINITION OF THREATENED AND PRIORITY FLORA SPECIES Note: Adapted from DPaW (2017c). Category Definition Taxa that have been adequately searched for and are deemed to be in the wild either rare, in danger of extinction, or otherwise in need of special protection, and have been gazetted as such (Schedules 1 to 4 of the Wildlife Conservation (Rare Flora) Notice under the WC Act). Threatened flora are further ranked by the DPaW to align with IUCN Red List categories and criteria: CR: Critically Endangered – considered to be facing an extremely high risk of extinction T – Threatened in the wild (Schedule 1); EN: Endangered – considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild (Schedule 2); or VU: Vulnerable – considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild (Schedule 3). EX: Presumed Extinct – taxa that have been adequately searched for and there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died (Schedule 4) Taxa that are known from one or a few collections or sight records (generally less than five), all on lands not managed for conservation, e.g. agricultural or pastoral lands, urban areas, Shire, Westrail and Main Roads WA road, gravel and soil reserves, and active mineral leases P1 – Priority 1 and under threat of habitat destruction or degradation. (Poorly known taxa) Taxa may be included if they are comparatively well known from one or more localities but do not meet adequacy of survey requirements and appear to be under immediate threat from known threatening processes. Taxa that are known from one or a few collections or sight records, some of which are on lands not under imminent threat of habitat destruction or degradation, e.g. -
GUIDE to the WESTERN AUSTRALIAN - SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GARDEN of the MELTON BOTANIC GARDEN
GUIDE TO THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN - SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GARDEN of the MELTON BOTANIC GARDEN First edition 2021 This first edition was developed by Barb Pye, Wendy Johnson, Jeanette Hodder, and David Pye, members of the Friends of the Melton Botanic Garden 1 Introduction Photographs are by Barb Pye, Anne Langmaid and David Pye Construction and planting of the Western Australian – South Australian (WASA) garden followed the Masterplan developed by Mike Smith and Associates, with its implementation planned by a committee comprising Barb Pye, Monique Perry (MCC), Anne Langmaid, John Bentley and David Pye. Construction commenced in 2014 with weed control, ripping, bed definitions and pathways for the whole area. In 2015, the northern beds were built and planted, commencing in May. The remaining beds were constructed and planted during 2016 and 2017. The garden was built and planted by volunteer members of the Friends of the Melton Botanic Garden (FMBG), who were assisted by Work for the Dole Teams. The garden continues to be managed and maintained by a volunteer group with members from the FMBG and the Centrelink Volunteers Program. David and Barb Pye have continued to manage the program to establish and maintain the Western Australian – South Australian garden (WASA). This program has included construction, plant selection and procurement, and maintenance. Growth of the garden has been fast, with significant flowering within 2 years. Information was referenced from Florabase – https://florabase.dpaw.wa.gov.au – website of the Western Australian Herbarium Seeds of South Australia https://spapps.environment.sa.gov.au/seedsofsa/ website of the South Australian Seed Conservation Centre which was established by the Botanic Gardens of Adelaide in 2002. -
Appendix 1 Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey.Pdf
Detailed Flora & Vegetation Survey Medcalf Vanadium Mining Project & Proposed Haul Road Prepared For Audalia Resources Limited October 2017 Version 2 Prepared by: Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 Boulder WA 6432 90930024 Disclaimer This document and its contents are to be treated as confidential and are published in accordance with and subject to an agreement between Botanica Consulting (BC) and the client for whom it has been prepared and is restricted to those issues that have been raised by the client in its engagement of BC. Neither this document nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any manner (report or other document) nor reproduced in part or whole by electronic, mechanical or chemical means, including photocopying, recording or any information storage system, without the express written approval of the client and/or BC. This document and its contents have been prepared utilising the standard of care and skill ordinarily exercised by Environmental Scientists in the preparation of such documents. All material presented in this document is published in good faith and is believed to be accurate at the time of writing. Any person or organisation who relies on or uses the document and its contents for purposes or reasons other than those agreed by BC and the client without primarily obtaining the prior written consent of BC, does so entirely at their own risk. BC denies all liability in tort, contract or otherwise for any loss, damage or injury of any kind whatsoever (whether in negligence or otherwise) that may be endured as a consequence of relying on this document and its contents for any purpose other than that agreed with the client. -
Vegetation and Flora Fitzgerald River National Park Improvement Project
Fitzgerald River National Park Improvement Project Culham Inlet to Hamersley Inlet Vegetation and Flora FITZGERALD RIVER NATIONAL PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CULHAM INLET to HAMERSLEY INLET VEGETATION & FLORA Gillian F Craig A report prepared for Main Roads Western Australia Great Southern Region Chester Pass Road, PO Box 503, Albany WA 6331 July 2010 Dr G F Craig Environmental Consultant ABN: 96 108 756 719 PO Box 130, Ravensthorpe 6346 T 08 9838 1071 © GF Craig 2010. Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by any means, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system is strictly prohibited without the express approval of the authors, Main Roads Western Australia (Albany) and/or the Department of Environment and Conservation (Albany). In undertaking this work, the author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information. Any conclusions drawn or recommendations made in the report are done in good faith and the consultant takes no responsibility for how this information is used subsequently by others. Cover photos: Clockwise from top left: Microcorys longiflora, Anthocercis fasciculata, Kunzea similis, Pimelea physodes (Qualup Bell), view west from East Mt Barren, Adenanthos ellipticus (Oval-leaf Adenanthos), Napolean Skink, Stylidium galioides (Yellow Mountain Triggerplant), Hibbertia papillata (©G.F.Craig 2010). FRNP Improvement Project: Culham Inlet to Hamersley Inlet GF Craig– July 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................iii -
Volume 86 Part 3
Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 86:123–132, 2003 Conservation status of Goodenia (Goodeniaceae) in Western Australia, including a review of threatened, rare and poorly known species L W Sage1,2 & J P Pigott1,3 1Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Conservation & Land Management, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 2Current address: Swan Coastal District, Department of Conservation & Land Management, 5 Dundebar Road, Wanneroo WA 6065 3Current address: 1 Redbourne Avenue, Mt Eliza VIC 3930 [email protected] (Manuscript received August 2002; accepted November, 2003) Abstract A comprehensive assessment of the current conservation status of Goodenia in Western Australia was based on information from herbarium labels at the Western Australian Herbarium (PERTH), Western Australian Department of Conservation & Land Management (CALM) filed information, original observations by the authors, the Flora of Australia volume 35, and personal communication with other botanists. Species diversity and conservation-listed taxa are assessed according to the Interim Biogeographic Regions of Australia for Western Australia. Phytogeography, biology, current conservation listings, threatening processes, apparent causes of rarity, and management and research recommendations are discussed. Many Goodenia are highly responsive to disturbance and prefer water-gaining sites, the margins of watercourses, or depressions. Highest diversity and conservation-listed taxa occur in the sand plain heaths of the South-West Botanical province. Recommended management procedures include a careful fire regime after research into the reproductive biology of a species, reserve design to include habitat preferences, floristic surveys of nearly all the conservation-listed, emergency actions to address threats in the South-West Botanical Province, and ex situ conservation measures once the true conservation status of a species is determined. -
Regional Assessment of the Wheatbelt of Western Australia: Central Wheatbelt
Regional Assessment of the Wheatbelt of Western Australia: Central Wheatbelt .:---- ~... --- ··.· ,, /. by Susan J. Wooller and Susan A. Moore in association with the Western Australian Natural Environment Evaluation Panel* Prepared for the Australian Heritage Commission June 2000 Published by Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, 2000 This publication is copyright. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act no part of it may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. ISBN: 0-86905-746-4 * The Australian Heritage Commission established and relies on the Western Australian Natural Environment Evaluation Panel to provide advice to the Commission on natural environment heritage matters. Members are John Dell (Chairperson), Western Australian Museum; Jenny Davis, Murdoch University; Angas Hopkins, Department of Conservation and Land Management; John Huisman, Murdoch University; Kevin Kenneally, Department of Conservation and Land Management; Jonathon Majer, Curtin University of Technology; Ken McNamara, Western Australian Museum; Barry Muir, Muir Environmental; and Les Pettitt, Wheatbelt Aboriginal Corporation. Cover drawing of Phascogale calura (red-tailed phascogale) by Fiona Scarff. Acknowledgements This project was funded by the Australian Heritage Commission with administrative support provided by the School of Environmental Science, Murdoch University. Valuable contributions to this assessment have been made Jane Ambrose, Melinda Brouwer, Ben Carr, Chris Tallentire, Greg Plummer, Julian Barnard, Greg Keighery, Sharon Collis, Kay Veryard, Anne Gunness, Noella Ross and Lisa Wright. The Pepartment of Environmental Protection kindly allowed access to, and use of their GIS and the Department of Conservation and Land Management's FloraBase database was also used. -
Recircumscription of Goodenia (Goodeniaceae)
A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 152: 27–104 (2020) Recircumscription of Goodenia (Goodeniaceae) 27 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.152.49604 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The concluding chapter: recircumscription of Goodenia (Goodeniaceae) to include four allied genera with an updated infrageneric classification Kelly A. Shepherd1, Brendan J. Lepschi2, Eden A. Johnson3, Andrew G. Gardner4, Emily B. Sessa5, Rachel S. Jabaily6 1 Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation & Attractions, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia 2 Australian National Herbarium, Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia 3 Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA 4 Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382, USA 5 Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA 6 Department of Organismal Biology & Ecology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA Corresponding author: Kelly A. Shepherd ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Morden | Received 23 December 2019 | Accepted 30 March 2020 | Published 7 July 2020 Citation: Shepherd KA, Lepschi BJ, Johnson EA, Gardner AG, Sessa EB, Jabaily RS (2020) The concluding chapter: recircumscription of Goodenia (Goodeniaceae) to include four allied genera with an updated infrageneric classification. PhytoKeys 152: 27–104. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.152.49604 Abstract Close scrutiny of Goodenia (Goodeniaceae) and allied genera in the ‘Core Goodeniaceae’ over recent years has clarified our understanding of this captivating group. While expanded sampling, sequencing of multiple regions, and a genome skimming reinforced backbone clearly supported Goodenia s.l. as mono- phyletic and distinct from Scaevola and Coopernookia, there appears to be no synapomorphic characters that uniquely characterise this morphologically diverse clade.