DOCSLIB.ORG

A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of Beliefs About Human Nature, Culture, and Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of Beliefs About Human Nature, Culture, and Science ESIC 2017 A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of Beliefs about Human Nature, Culture, and Science Joseph Carroll, John A. Johnson, Catherine Salmon, Jens Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, Mathias Clasen, and Emelie Jonsson Abstract How far has the Darwinian revolution come? To what extent have evolutionary ideas penetrated into the social sciences and humanities? Are the “science wars” over? Or do whole blocs of disciplines face off over an unbridgeable epistemic gap? To answerquestions like these, contributors to top journals in 22 disciplines were surveyed on their beliefs about human nature, culture, and science. More than 600 respondents completed the survey. Scoring patterns divided into two main sets of disciplines. Genetic influences were emphasized in the evolutionary social sciences, evolutionary humanities, psychology, empirical study of the arts, philosophy, economics, and political science. Environmental influences were emphasized in most of the humanities disciplines and in anthropology, sociology, education, and women’s or gender studies. Confidence in scientific explanation correlated positively with emphasizing genetic influences on behavior, and negatively with emphasizing environmental influences. Knowing the current actual landscape of belief should help scholars avoid sterile debates and ease the way toward fruitful collaborations with neighboring disciplines. Keywords: human nature, culture, science, science wars, cultural construction, evolutionary social science, social science, humanities, biocultural theory INTRODUCTION or to anthropologists and sociologists? Are anthropologists and sociologists closer to liter- How much have evolutionary ideas penetrated ary scholars and historians or to psychologists into the various disciplines? To what extent, if and political scientists? Do certain disciplines any, do the social sciences and the humanities in the social sciences and humanities cluster form separate, internally cohesive blocs—blocs together in emphasizing culture’s independence defined by shared ideas about human nature and from biology, or in adopting skeptical attitudes culture, and by shared attitudes toward science? toward the validity of scientific knowledge? Do To what extent do evolutionists in the social other disciplines cluster together in empha- sciences and humanities converge in beliefs and sizing biological constraints on culture, or in attitudes? If the evolutionists stand together, to affirming the validity of scientific knowledge? what extent do they stand apart from scholars To what extent, if any, do beliefs about the and scientists publishing in journals that are not validity of scientific knowledge correlate with a explicitly evolutionary? Do scholars and scien- belief that human behavior is heavily influenced tists in different disciplines vary in the degree by biology? to which they share views with the evolution- Questions such as these characterize major ists? For instance, are psychologists and political controversies in academic intellectual life. Within scientists closer in their views to evolutionists the social sciences, for over a century, the deepest Joseph Carroll et al. conflict has been between contrasting claims for side, and environmental causes, including cul- biological or environmental causes of behav- tural conventions, on the other; (3) statements ior. That conflict blazed up in the sociobiology about the interactions between culture and wars of the 1970s, and has never since subsided evolution over evolutionary time scales—that (Fox 1989; Degler 1991; Tooby and Cosmides is, statements about gene–culture coevolution, 1992; Segerstråle 2000; Alcock 2001; Pinker cultural autonomy, and cultural evolution; and 2002; Kenrick 2011; Horowitz, Yaworsky, and (4) statements about the validity and scope of Kickham 2014). Antagonism between the sci- scientific explanation. Respondents were asked ences and humanities has been smoldering at to indicate the degree to which they agreed or least since the debate between T. H. Huxley and disagreed with these statements. Matthew Arnold in the late Victorian period. The survey was designed to give an up- In the middle of the twentieth century, it flared to-date map of the current academic landscape up in the “two cultures” debate between C. P. of belief. Any such map has intrinsic interest, Snow and F. R. Leavis; and in the 1990s, it and it can also contribute to research. It can flashed into open warfare—“the science wars” enable intellectual historians to orient them- (Huxley [1880] 1898; Arnold [1882] 1974; selves more accurately toward current beliefs Snow [1959] 1993; Leavis [1959] 1972; Gross and attitudes. Knowing what researchers in and Levitt 1994; Aronowitz 1996; Koertge other disciplines actually think can help sci- 1998; Sokal and Bricmont 1998; Brown 2001; entists and scholars formulate hypotheses that Weinberg 2001; Parsons 2003; Boghossian isolate real issues at contention and thus avoid 2006; Smith 2006; Carroll 2011; Smith 2016). sterile controversies generated by unintentional In recent decades, the conflict over scientific straw-manning. Conversely, having data on knowledge has been closely intertwined with the actual beliefs can help forestall evasions or conflict over the causes of human behavior— obfuscations produced by an inconsistent use closely intertwined, but not simply reducible of terms. On the more positive side, finding one to the other. Even without support from that contiguous disciplines are closer in belief hard data, one might be confident that theorists than one supposed could ease the way toward who deprecate biological influences on behav- cross-disciplinary collaboration and synthesis. ior range from social scientists who adopt rig- For many researchers, synthesis, integration, orous empirical methods to philosophers and and comprehensiveness have inherent value historians of science who regard science as a (Wilson 1998; Slingerland and Collard 2012; medium for ideology. Is it nonetheless true that Carroll, McAdams, and Wilson 2016). A chief describing science as socially constructed cor- motive in conducting this survey was to find out relates with minimizing biological influences on how far we have come in achieving a consensus human behavior? And if that correlation does based both on a shared reliance on scientific exist, does it cross the boundary between the knowledge and on shared ideas about the bio- social sciences and the humanities? One might logical underpinnings of human behavior—how guess, and dispute. Instead, we gathered system- far we have come, and how far we still have to go. atic survey data to help answer these questions. To assess basic beliefs and attitudes about biol- METHODS ogy, culture, and science, we developed a survey questionnaire that deployed four main groups of Selecting and Categorizing Disciplines statements: (1) statements about human univer- sals and cultural diversity; (2) statements about Potential respondents were selected by the relative causal force of evolved and genet- balancing two criteria for inclusion: (1) approx- ically transmitted characteristics, on the one imating to the proportions of PhDs awarded 2 Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of Beliefs about Human Nature, Culture, and Science in the various disciplines of the social sciences where to place these disciplines depended on and humanities; and (2) obtaining fairly equal subject matter, methodology, and classifica- numbers of respondents among evolution- tion of journals in indices of impact factors. ary social scientists, nonevolutionary social Researchers in the empirical studies of the arts scientists, and nonevolutionary humanists. have a humanities subject matter, but their (The much smaller target number of evolu- methods are quantitative, and most of them tionary humanists was determined by the small have appointments in departments of psy- number available. A search for journal articles chology. That group was thus assigned to the by evolutionary humanists produced a list of social sciences. Women’s or gender studies and 79 potential respondents.) A table created by ethnic studies have primarily social subjects, the National Center for Education Statistics not subjects in imaginative culture (the arts, provided information on numbers of PhDs religion, history, philosophy). The top jour- awarded.1 Beginning with information provided nals in ethnic studies, though, are primarily by this table, a list of disciplines was compiled discursive, not quantitative, in orientation, and target numbers of potential respondents and the top journals in women’s or gender assigned to each discipline. studies include much quantitative work, so In addition to evolutionary social scientists ethnic studies was placed in the humanities, and evolutionary humanists, 20 specific disci- and women’s or gender studies in the social plines were identified as relevant to the survey. sciences. In indices of impact factors, the top Humanities disciplines that are not explicitly journals in communication are sometimes designated as evolutionary include drama and grouped with the social sciences and some- theater, ethnic studies, film studies, history, his- times with the humanities. Much of the work, tory and philosophy of science, literary study though, is quantitative, and the field as a whole (Anglophone, European, and comparative), seems to have more affinity, in both method- music, philosophy, religious studies, and the ology and subject matter, with sociology than visual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of Joseph Carroll, Reading Human Nature: Literary Darwinism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College | Bryn Mawr College... Bryn Mawr Review of Comparative Literature Volume 9 Article 1 Number 2 Fall 2011 Fall 2011 Review of Joseph Carroll, Reading Human Nature: Literary Darwinism in Theory and Practice and Virginia Richter, Literature After Darwin: Human Beasts in Western Fiction, 1859-1939. Carlo Salzani Monash University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/bmrcl Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Recommended Citation Salzani, Carlo (2011). Review of "Review of Joseph Carroll, Reading Human Nature: Literary Darwinism in Theory and Practice and Virginia Richter, Literature After Darwin: Human Beasts in Western Fiction, 1859-1939.," Bryn Mawr Review of Comparative Literature: Vol. 9 : No. 2 Available at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/bmrcl/vol9/iss2/1 This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/bmrcl/vol9/iss2/1 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Salzani: Salzani on Carroll and Richter Joseph Carroll, Reading Human Nature: Literary Darwinism in Theory and Practice. New York: SUNY Press, 2011. 368 pp. ISBN 9781438435220. Virginia Richter, Literature After Darwin: Human Beasts in Western Fiction, 1859-1939. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 272 pp. ISBN 9780230273405. Reviewed by Carlo Salzani, Monash University 1. The year 2009 was the 200th anniversary of Darwin's birth and the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species; it was therefore named the "Darwin Year" and was celebrated all over the world by academic conferences and events targeting the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • ASEBL Journal
    January 2021 Volume 15 ASEBL Journal Association for the Study of EDITOR (Ethical Behavior)•(Evolutionary Biology) in Literature St. Francis College, Brooklyn Heights, N.Y. Gregory F. Tague, Ph.D. ▬ ~ EDITORIAL BOARD ISSUE ON CONSCIOUSNESS Divya Bhatnagar, Ph.D. (To Navigate to Articles, Click on Author’s Last Name) — Kristy Biolsi, Ph.D. EDITOR’S NOTE by Gregory F. Tague, pg. 2 Alison Dell, Ph.D. † Wendy Galgan, “Here in the gloaming...” pg. 6 Tom Dolack, Ph.D. † Michelle Scalise Sugiyama, “The Fiction that Fiction is Fiction” pg. 8 Wendy Galgan, Ph.D. † Tom Dolack, “Common Origins of Consciousness Joe Keener, Ph.D. and Symbolic Thought” pg. 12 Eric Luttrell, Ph.D. † Daniel Meyer-Dinkgräfe, “Theatre and Consciousness— From Theory to Practice” pg. 16 Riza Öztürk, Ph.D. † Divya Bhatnagar, “Raju’s Journey From ‘Self to Soul’: An Exploration Eric Platt, Ph.D. of Spiritual Blocks, Spiritual Growth, and Spiritual Liberation in R.K. Narayan’s ‘The Guide’” pg. 19 Anja Müller-Wood, Ph.D. SCIENCE CONSULTANT † Carole Brooks Platt, “Frida Kahlo and Other Androgynous Women Kathleen A. Nolan, Ph.D. in the Wake of Joan of Arc” pg. 23 EDITORIAL INTERN † Kristy L. Biolsi and Kathleen A. Nolan, “Thoughts on Marine Mammal Celine Yarde Cognition and Consciousness” pg. 27 † Laura Egan, “What is it Like to be an Anxious Bat?” pg. 39 † Daniel Kaplin, “William James’s Legacy: From a ‘Stream of Consciousness’ to an Ocean of Psychological Principles” pg. 41 † Marina Gair, “Teacher as Artist: Integrating a Contemplative Practice in Teacher Education” pg. 45 † Christopher Stratman, “Analytic Phenomenology and the Temporality of Consciousness” pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesia: Dark Descent
    kvarter Volume 13 • 2016 akademiskacademic quarter A Consilient Approach to Horror Video Games Challenges and Opportunities Mathias Clasen is assistant professor in literature and media at the School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University. His re- search is mainly concerned with the interdisciplinary study of frightening entertainment. He is associate editor of Evolutio- nary Studies in Imaginative Culture. Jens Kjeldgaard-Christiansen is graduate student at the School of Communication and Cul- ture, Aarhus University. His research covers the agonistic structure of popular culture and its adaptive roots. He has published on the psychology of pop-cultural villains in Evolu- tionary Behavioral Sciences. Abstract In response to the crisis in the humanities, some scholars have pro- posed consilience as a solution. They argue that humanists should build on recent findings in the sciences of mind, including cogni- tive and evolutionary psychology. We discuss the benefits and pit- falls of such an approach, illustrating our discussion with an analy- sis of the horror video game Amnesia: The Dark Descent. We argue that recent theoretical and empirical developments in the evolu- tionary social sciences can make sense of how and why horror games so effectively foster immersion and predictable psycho- physiological responses. They target evolved survival mechanisms and are structured to reward vigilance and persistence in the face of fear- and anxiety-provoking stimuli. Finally, we discuss and re- fute a number of common criticisms of the consilient approach. Keywords media psychology, game studies, consilience, horror, evolutionary psychology Volume 13 127 A Consilient Approach to Horror Video Games kvarter Mathias Clasen, Jens Kjeldgaard-Christiansen akademiskacademic quarter Introduction By their own admission, the humanities are in trouble.
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Austenʼs Depiction of Womenʼs Mating Strategies
    3ULGHDQG3UHMXGLFHRU)DPLO\DQG)OLUWDWLRQ"-DQH$XVWHQ૷V 'HSLFWLRQRI:RPHQ૷V0DWLQJ6WUDWHJLHV 'DQLHO-.UXJHU0DU\DQQH/)LVKHU6DUDK/6WURXW6KDQD૷H&ODUN6KHOE\ /HZLV0LFKHOOH:HKEH Philosophy and Literature, Volume 38, Number 1A, October 2014, pp. A114-A128 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\-RKQV+RSNLQV8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/phl.2014.0029 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/phl/summary/v038/38.1A.kruger.html Access provided by New York University (19 Apr 2015 23:39 GMT) Daniel J. Kruger, Maryanne L. Fisher, Sarah L. Strout, Shana’e Clark, Shelby Lewis, and Michelle Wehbe PRIDE AND PREJUDICE OR FAMILY AND FLIRTATION? JANE AUSTEN’S DEPICTION OF WOMEN’S MATING STRATEGIES Abstract. Jane Austen’s works may be perennially popular because they excel at the three kinds of adaptive advantage that Denis Dutton pro- posed to explain the pervasiveness of fiction. Based on brief personality sketches assembled from her novels, contemporary readers readily iden- tify her characters’ mating strategies. They accurately match characters to actual behaviors portrayed in the novels, and would interact with the characters in ways that protected their own reproductive interests. Thus, Austen’s character descriptions provide low-cost, low-risk surrogate experiences of encounters with realistic personas, and promote readers’ understanding of others’ motivations and behaviors in order to regulate their own behavior adaptively. I n THE ART INSTINCT, Denis Dutton promoted a theoretical framework Ithat “has more validity, more power, and more possibilities than the hermetic discourse that deadens so much of the humanities.”1 This framework is Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural and sexual selection. Dutton proposed to seek “human universals that underlie the vast cacophony of cultural differences and across the globe” (AI, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Hierarchy in the Library: Egalitarian Dynamics in Victorian Novels
    Evolutionary Psychology www.epjournal.net – 2008. 6(4): 715-738 ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Original Article Hierarchy in the Library: Egalitarian Dynamics in Victorian Novels John A. Johnson, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, DuBois, PA, USA. Email: [email protected] (Corresponding author) Joseph Carroll, Department of English, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, USA. Jonathan Gottschall, Department of English, Washington & Jefferson College, Washington, PA, USA. Daniel Kruger, Prevention Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Abstract: The current research investigated the psychological differences between protagonists and antagonists in literature and the impact of these differences on readers. It was hypothesized that protagonists would embody cooperative motives and behaviors that are valued by egalitarian hunter-gatherers groups, whereas antagonists would demonstrate status-seeking and dominance behaviors that are stigmatized in such groups. This hypothesis was tested with an online questionnaire listing characters from 201 canonical British novels of the longer nineteenth century. 519 respondents generated 1470 protocols on 435 characters. Respondents identified the characters as protagonists, antagonists, or minor characters, judged the characters’ motives according to human life history theory, rated the characters’ traits according to the five-factor model of personality, and specified their own emotional responses to the characters on categories adapted from Ekman’s seven basic emotions. As expected, antagonists are motivated almost exclusively by the desire for social dominance, their personality traits correspond to this motive, and they elicit strongly negative emotional responses from readers. Protagonists are oriented to cooperative and affiliative behavior and elicit positive emotional responses from readers. Novels therefore apparently enable readers to participate vicariously in an egalitarian social dynamic like that found in hunter-gatherer societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Literary Darwinism
    Against Literary Darwinism Jonathan Kramnick Literary Darwinists integrate literary concepts with a modern evolutionary understanding of the evolved and adapted characteristics of human nature. They aim not just at being one more “school” or movement in literary theory. They aim at fundamentally transforming the framework for all literary study. They think that all knowledge about human behavior, including the products of the human imagination, can and should be subsumed within the evolutionary perspective. —JOSEPH CARROLL, “What Is Literary Darwinism?” What is undeniable is that theories of human behavior must be consistent with the fact of evolution; so too must they be consistent with the fact that the human body is made of matter. However, it does not follow from this that either evolutionary biology or physics can tell us anything interesting about human behavior. —ELLIOTT SOBER, Philosophy of Biology Darwinian literary criticism has a strange place in the current intellec- tual scene. Only a short while ago, evolutionary perspectives on art and literature were scarce and exotic. In the past few years, studies connecting literary texts to processes of natural and sexual selection have come forth in handsome volumes from the major trade and university presses and have received a fascinated response from magazines, newspapers, and even tele- vision.1 Arguably no movement in literary studies has attracted so much 1. Academic year 2008–2009 was something of a watershed moment for literary Darwinism, marked by the twin publication of Denis Dutton, The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution (New York, 2009), hereafter abbreviated AI; and Brian Boyd, On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction (Cambridge, Mass., 2009); hereafter abbreviated OS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pleistocene Protagonist
    The Pleistocene protagonist: An evolutionary framework for the analysis ANGOR UNIVERSITY of film protagonists Pelican, Kira-Anne; Ward, Robert; Sherry, Jamie Journal of Screenwriting DOI: 10.1386/josc.7.3.331_1 PRIFYSGOL BANGOR / B Published: 01/09/2016 Peer reviewed version Cyswllt i'r cyhoeddiad / Link to publication Dyfyniad o'r fersiwn a gyhoeddwyd / Citation for published version (APA): Pelican, K-A., Ward, R., & Sherry, J. (2016). The Pleistocene protagonist: An evolutionary framework for the analysis of film protagonists. Journal of Screenwriting, 7(3), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.7.3.331_1 Hawliau Cyffredinol / General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. 29. Sep. 2021 The Pleistocene Protagonist: An Evolutionary Framework for the Analysis of Film Protagonists Kira-Anne Pelican, Robert Ward, Jamie Sherry (Bangor University) Abstract Over the last twenty-five years, evolutionary science has reinvigorated not only the human sciences but also literary criticism and film theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Kean, "Red in Tooth and Claw Among the Literati,"
    NEWSFOCUS Red in Tooth and Claw Among the Literati Upset by the isolation of their fi eld, some critics are trying to bring Darwin’s ideas and recent science to the study of literature. They haven’t been popular IN THE EARLY 1990S JOSEPH CARROLL, AN English professor at the University of Mis- souri, St. Louis, presented a paper on the possibility of studying literature through the lens of Darwinian evolution. Not long afterward, he heard from a colleague that the paper had generated lots of discus- sion, though not for the most fl attering rea- on May 5, 2011 son. “People didn’t think that anyone in literary studies cared about such things,” Carroll recalls. “There was an argument over whether it was a hoax.” Carroll was indeed serious. For 2 decades prior, Freudianism, Marxism, poststructur- alism, postcolonialism, and other fashion- able “isms” had dominated the academic study of literature. These schools dismissed www.sciencemag.org the idea that evolutionary pressures have shaped human nature, attributing all human nature to culture instead. Frustrated by this thinking, which he has grumbled is “unable we spend 4 hours per day consuming, dis- Steven Pinker and biologist Edward O. to contribute in any useful way to the serious cussing, and creating stories, and 4 minutes Wilson of Harvard University and biologist world of adult knowledge,” Carroll rebelled. per day having sex.) David Sloan Wilson of Binghamton Univer- In 1994, he helped found a new field by Most scientific lit scholars incorpo- sity in New York state. In contrast, apply- Downloaded from publishing his self-described “big, baggy rate at least some evolution into their work ing evolutionary thought to the human mind monster,” Evolution and Literary Theory, a because evolution provides a framework for has never been popular in the humanities, 536-page book promoting an approach to understanding human behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Carroll, Jonathan Gottschall, John A. Johnson, and Daniel Kruger
    AGONISTIC STRUCTURE IN CANONICAL BRITISH NOVELS OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY joseph Carroll, jonathan Gottschall, john A. johnson, and Daniel Kruger Historical and Methodological Context Evolutionary Literary Study Literature did not become the subject ofan academic discipline until the last two decades of the 19th century and, until the 1940s, liter­ ary scholarship consisted chiefly ofphilological and historical schol­ arship and moralized aesthetic commentary (Abrams 1997; Graff 2007). During the 1930s, "The New Criticism" introduced methods for the intensive formal analysis oftheme, tone, and style. During the late 1970s, "poststructuralism" or "postmodernism," spearheaded by the "deconstructive" philosophy ofJacques Derrida, produced a revolution in literary studies. Deconstruction identifies language or "discourse" as the primary constitutive material of human experi­ ence. In its political aspect, post structuralism seeks to undermine traditionally dominant terms in social, psychological, and sexual binaries: ruling classes versus the oppressed, whites versus people of color, colonialists versus colonized peoples, mentally healthy people versus the insane, law-abiding citizens versus outlaws, males versus females, and heterosexuals versus homosexuals. In modern Western civilization, science is itself a dominant cultural value and is con­ trasted with terms such as superstition, foith, ignorance, mysticism, and ideology. In its epistemological aspect, poststructuralist theo­ ries of science seek to undermine the ideas of "truth" and
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Theories and Debates About Evolution and the Arts: a Critical Review
    Arcadia 2016; 51(1): 3–21 John Neubauer Recent Theories and Debates about Evolution and the Arts: A Critical Review DOI 10.1515/arcadia-2016-0002 Recently, the Dutch writer Arnon Grunberg wrote his latest story, Het bestand (meaning both ‘computer file’ and ‘truce’) while his brain was observed and measured by scientists using screen capture and various physiological measuring techniques that recorded his brain activity, emotions, and subjective feelings. When the book went on the market during the Netherlands Boekenweek (Book Week) in February 2015, Grunberg along with neuroscientist and researcher Ys- brand van der Werf together on a book tour discussed their experiment at various bookstores and lecture halls. Now readers of Grunberg are invited by the research institute TNO to participate in a follow-up test that monitors reader’s brains. These spectacular experiments on the contrary do not reveal spectacular results, they however do display the cutting edge of interdisciplinary studies between literature and the cognitive sciences. Moreover, they indicate a more controversial topic, ‘evolution and the arts,’ although quite surprisingly, the history of this historical approach is littered with some rather breathtaking cadavers. Let me remind you that the subject was introduced in 1857, not by Darwin but instead by Herbert Spencer’s pre-Darwinian essay on the evolution of music, which defined music as emotionally intensified speech. Skipping Darwin’s response, and some dangerous evolutionary ideas in early-twentieth-century folklore and anthropology, I only care to cite Richard Dawkins’s “meme” theory, a more recent cadaver important for cultural evolution studies. Since Dawkins’s ‘selfish’ genes undergo only rare mutations, ‘ordinary genes’ could become the models for cultural “memes.” That is, only if the “memes” were also semi-permanent.
    [Show full text]
  • Plotting Devices: Literary Darwinism in the Laboratory
    English Faculty Publications English 2014 Plotting Devices: Literary Darwinism in the Laboratory John Hay University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/english_fac_articles Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Repository Citation Hay, J. (2014). Plotting Devices: Literary Darwinism in the Laboratory. Philosophy and Literature, 38 A148-A161. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/english_fac_articles/41 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Article in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Article has been accepted for inclusion in English Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IV. Darwinian Selection and the World of Art John Hay PLOTTING DEVICES: LITERARY DARWINISM IN THE LABORATORY Abstract. Critics of literary Darwinism like to point out the weaknesses of its scientific scaffolding, but the real flaw in this research program is its neglect of literary history and stylistic evolution. A full-fledged scientific approach to literary criticism should incorporate the kind of work being done by Franco Moretti at the Stanford Literary Lab—a quantitative analysis of the history of literary form.
    [Show full text]
  • Primitive Minds
    PRIMITIVE MINDS P RIMITIVE MINDS Evolution and Spiritual Experience in the Victorian Novel Anna Neill THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS • COLUMBUS Copyright © 2013 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Neill, Anna, 1965– Primitive minds : evolution and spiritual experience in the Victorian novel / Anna Neill. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8142-1225-7 (cloth : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-8142-9327-0 (cd) 1. English fiction—19th century—History and criticism. 2. English literature—19th cen- tury—History and criticism. 3. Spiritualism in literature. 4. Psychology in literature. 5. Psy- chology and literature. 6. Realism in literature. 7. Literature and science. I. Title. PR878.P75N45 2013 823'.809353—dc23 2013008650 Cover design by Laurence J. Nozik Text design by Juliet Williams Type set in Adobe Garamond Pro Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American Na- tional Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materi- als. ANSI Z39.48–1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For Kirk and Connor C ONTENTS Acknowledgments ix INTRODUCTION • EVOLUTION AND THE DREAMY MIND 1 I. Corporeal Spirit: The Evolution and Dissolution of Mind 14 II. Will, Automatism, and Spiritual Experience 21 III. The Realist Novel and the Dreamy Mind 27 CHAPTER 1 • CHARLOTTE Brontë’s HYPOCHONDRIACAL HEROINES 33 I. Hypochondriasis, Self-Control, and the Evolution of Consciousness 40 II. Rapture and Realism in Jane Eyre 47 III. Villette: Demonic Imagination and the Repellent Real 55 CHAPTER 2 • SPIRITS AND SEIZURES IN BLEAK HOUSE AND OUR MUTUAL FRIEND 64 I.
    [Show full text]