DOCSLIB.ORG

Salt/Nutrient Management Plan for Paso Robles Groundwater Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salt/Nutrient Management Plan for Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Salt/Nutrient Management Plan for the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin MAY 2015 Salt/Nutrient Management Plan for the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Final Report Prepared by: May 2015 Paso Robles Salt / Nutrient Management Plan Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank. May 2015 Paso Robles Salt / Nutrient Management Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 ES-1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ ES-1 ES-2 Outreach ............................................................................................................. ES-2 ES-3 Basin Characterization ...................................................................................... ES-3 ES-4 Existing and Foreseeable Salt and Nutrient Sources ..................................... ES-6 ES-5 Assimilative Capacity and Anti-Degradation Analysis ................................. ES-11 ES-6 Implementation Measures, Goals & Objectives ............................................ ES-13 ES-7 Salt and Nutrient Groundwater Quality Monitoring Program ....................... ES-16 Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Purpose of the SNMP ............................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Preparation and Participation .................................................................................. 1-2 Chapter 2 Outreach ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Outreach and the SNMP Process ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholders ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Outreach Mechanisms ............................................................................................ 2-2 Chapter 3 Basin Characteristics ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Setting ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Landuse .................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.3 Climate and Hydrology ............................................................................................ 3-7 3.4 Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................................................... 3-11 3.5 Water Quality ........................................................................................................ 3-25 3.6 Water Balance Estimation ..................................................................................... 3-44 3.7 Summary ............................................................................................................... 3-54 Chapter 4 Loading Analysis .................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Selection of Baseline and Future Planning Period .................................................. 4-1 4.2 Identification of Salt and Nutrient Indicator Constituents ........................................ 4-2 4.3 Loading Analysis Tools ......................................................................................... 4-27 4.4 Identification and Quantification of Salt and Nutrient Sources .............................. 4-28 4.5 Septic and Wastewater Systems .......................................................................... 4-39 4.6 Summary ............................................................................................................... 4-45 Chapter 5 Assimilative Capacity and Anti-Degradation Analysis ...................................... 5-1 5.1 Basin Conceptual Model ......................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Fate and Transport in Groundwater Basin .............................................................. 5-1 5.3 Existing Groundwater Quality .................................................................................. 5-3 5.4 Surface Loading Model ........................................................................................... 5-5 5.5 Groundwater Quality Trend Analysis .................................................................... 5-12 5.6 Antidegradation Assessment ................................................................................ 5-22 Chapter 6 SNMP Goals and Objectives ................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Basin Management Goals and Objectives .............................................................. 6-1 Chapter 7 Implementation Measures .................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Management Strategies .......................................................................................... 7-1 Chapter 8 Groundwater Quality Monitoring ......................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 8-1 8.2 Summary of SNMP Groundwater Quality Monitoring Program ............................. 8-11 May 2015 Paso Robles Salt / Nutrient Management Plan Table of Contents 8.3 Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................... 8-12 Chapter 9 References ............................................................................................................. 9-1 9.1 Chapter 3 - Basin Characteristics ........................................................................... 9-1 9.2 Chapter 4 - Loading Analysis .................................................................................. 9-1 9.3 Chapter 5 - Assimilative Capacity and Anti-Degradation Analysis .......................... 9-3 9.4 Chapter 7 - Implementation Measures .................................................................... 9-4 9.5 Chapter 8 - Groundwater Quality Monitoring .......................................................... 9-4 List of Tables Table 2-1: Paso Robles SNMP Stakeholder Workshops ........................................................... 2-3 Table 3-1: Major Land Use Group ............................................................................................. 3-4 Table 3-2: Average Monthly Precipitation at Weather Stations ................................................. 3-9 Table 3-3: Average Monthly Reference Evapotranspiration ...................................................... 3-9 Table 3-4: Measured Streamflow for Major Rivers and Creeks ............................................... 3-10 Table 3-5: Average Aquifer Properties and Well Information from Historic Field Data ............ 3-21 Table 3-6: Average Alluvium Properties Computed from Basin Groundwater Model .............. 3-21 Table 3-7: Average Confined Aquifer Properties Computed from Basin Groundwater Model ............................................................................................................................... 3-22 Table 3-8: Median Surface Water Quality Objectives .............................................................. 3-26 Table 3-9: Median Groundwater Quality Objectives ................................................................ 3-26 Table 3-10: Nitrate (as N) Water Quality Objectives for Municipal and Domestic Supply, and Agricultural Water Use ..................................................................................................... 3-26 Table 3-11: Title 22 Drinking Water Standards for TDS, Nitrate (as N), and Chloride ............. 3-26 Table 3-12: Measured and Average Water Quality Constituent Concentrations for Study Areas ..................................................................................................................... 3-31 Table 3-13: Average Annual Groundwater Recharge in the Unconfined Aquifer..................... 3-49 Table 3-14: Average Annual Groundwater Recharge in the Confined Aquifer ........................ 3-50 Table 3-15: Average Annual Net Horizontal Subsurface Inflows in the Unconfined Aquifer between Study Areas ....................................................................................................... 3-50 Table 3-16: Average Annual Net Horizontal Subsurface Inflows in the Confined Aquifer between Study Areas ...................................................................................................................... 3-51 Table 3-17: Average Annual Net Vertical Groundwater Flow from Unconfined to Confined Aquifer .............................................................................................................................. 3-52 Table 3-18: Average Annual Groundwater Discharge in the Unconfined Aquifer .................... 3-53 Table 3-19: Average Annual Groundwater Discharge in the Confined Aquifer ........................ 3-54 Table 4-1: Evaluation of Potential Indicator Constituents .......................................................... 4-3 Table 4-2: Average
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nacimiento Dam Operation Policy
    Nacimiento Dam Operation Policy Monterey County Water Resources Agency Adopted by the Board of Directors February 20, 2018 Recommended by the Reservoir Operations Advisory Committee November 30, 2017 Contents Contents Section I – Introduction and Background ................................................................................ 1 General Description / Information ............................................................................................. 2 Nacimiento River ..................................................................................................................... 2 Nacimiento Dam ..................................................................................................................... 3 Nacimiento Hydroelectric Plant .............................................................................................. 3 Nacimiento Water Project (NWP) ........................................................................................... 4 Pertinent Nacimiento Reservoir Elevations ............................................................................ 4 Section II – Governance and Water Rights .............................................................................. 7 Monterey County Water Resources Agency Board of Supervisors ............................................ 7 Monterey County Water Resources Agency Board of Directors ................................................ 7 Reservoir Operations Advisory Committee ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jodi Mcgraw, Ph.D. Population and Community Ecologist PO Box 883 Boulder Creek, CA 95006 (831) 338-1990 [email protected]
    RAPID BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE SALINAS RIVER, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared By: Jodi McGraw, Ph.D. Population and Community Ecologist PO Box 883 Boulder Creek, CA 95006 (831) 338-1990 [email protected] With Assistance From: Christina Boldero Intern, The Nature Conservancy 201 Mission Street 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Submitted to: The Nature Conservancy 201 Mission Street 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 April 15, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page List of Tables iv List of Figures v Introduction 1 Section 1: The Physical Environment 4 1.1 Climate 4 1.2 Hydrology 4 1.2.1 Historic Hydrological Conditions 4 1.2.2 Hydrological Alterations 5 1.2.2.1 Dams 5 1.2.2.2 Levees 6 1.2.2.3 Groundwater pumping 6 1.2.2.4 Channel Alterations 7 1.2.2.5 Estuary and Lagoon Alterations 7 1.2.2.5 Other Hydrological Alterations 7 1.2.3 Current Hydrological Conditions 8 1.3 Water Quality 10 1.4 Land Use 10 1.4.1 Historic Land Use 11 1.4.2 Current Land Use 11 1.4.2.1 Agricultural Land 12 1.4.2.2 Urban Areas 13 1.4.3 Current Land Use Changes 13 Section 2: High Priority Species and Communities 13 2.1 Aquatic Communities 13 2.1.1 Coastal Wetlands 13 2.1.2 Freshwater Wetlands 13 2.2 Aquatic Species 14 2.2.1 Pinnacles Riffle Beetle 14 2.2.2 Pacific Lamprey 15 2.2.3 Monterey Roach 16 2.2.4 Sacramento Speckled Dace 16 2.2.5 Steelhead trout 16 2.2.6 California Red-Legged Frog 21 2.2.7 Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog 22 2.2.8 Southwestern pond turtle 22 Salinas River Biological Assessment ii Jodi M.
    [Show full text]
  • Monterey County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Monterey County Salinas River The Salinas River consists of more than 75 stream miles and drains a watershed of about 4,780 square miles. The river flows northwest from headwaters on the north side of Garcia Mountain to its mouth near the town of Marina. A stone and concrete dam is located about 8.5 miles downstream from the Salinas Dam. It is approximately 14 feet high and is considered a total passage barrier (Hill pers. comm.). The dam forming Santa Margarita Lake is located at stream mile 154 and was constructed in 1941. The Salinas Dam is operated under an agreement requiring that a “live stream” be maintained in the Salinas River from the dam continuously to the confluence of the Salinas and Nacimiento rivers. When a “live stream” cannot be maintained, operators are to release the amount of the reservoir inflow. At times, there is insufficient inflow to ensure a “live stream” to the Nacimiento River (Biskner and Gallagher 1995). In addition, two of the three largest tributaries of the Salinas River have large water storage projects. Releases are made from both the San Antonio and Nacimiento reservoirs that contribute to flows in the Salinas River. Operations are described in an appendix to a 2001 EIR: “ During periods when…natural flow in the Salinas River reaches the north end of the valley, releases are cut back to minimum levels to maximize storage. Minimum releases of 25 cfs are required by agreement with CDFG and flows generally range from 25-25[sic] cfs during the minimum release phase of operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Application to Appropriate Water in Division of Water Rights California") P.O
    TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK California Environmental Protection Agency (For instructions, see booklet: "How to File an State Water Resources Control Board Application to Appropriate Water in Division of Water Rights California") P.O. Box 2000, Sacramento, CA 95812-2000 Tel: (916) 341-5300 Fax: (916) 341-5400 APPLICATION NO www. waterboards. ca.gov/waterrights APPLICATION TO APPROPRIATE WATER 1. APPLICANT/AGENT APPLICANT ASSIGNED AGENT (if any) Name Shandon-San Juan Water District Michael Preszler Mailing Address P.O. Box 150 169 Parkshore Drive, Suite 110 City, State & Zip Shandon, CA 93461 Folsom, CA 95630 Telephone (805) 451-0841 (916) 542-7895 Fax E-mail [email protected] [email protected] 2. OWNERSHIP INFORMATION (Please check type of ownership.) Sole Owner _ Limited Liability Company (LLC) _General Partnership* „ Limited Partnership* Business Trust _ Husband/Wife Co-Ownership _ Corporation Joint Venture x Other California Water District *Please identify the names, addresses and phone numbers of all partners. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Provide a detailed description of your project, including, but not limited to, type of construction activity, area to be graded or excavated, and how the water will be used.) Add additional pages if needed and check box below and label as an attachment. This project is being undertaken by the Shandon-San Juan Water District. The purpose of the project is to augment groundwater supplies in the Paso Robles Area Subbasin (the "Subbasin") by transporting unappropriated water in Lake Nacimiento through the existing Nacimiento Water Project Pipeline (the "Pipeline") to the Subbasin. Water would be delivered to the Subbasin by direct recharge in groundwater recharge facilities that will be constructed, owned and operated by Applicant.
    [Show full text]
  • Creek Stewardship Guide for San Luis Obispo County Was Adapted from the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District’S Stewardship Guide for the Russian River
    Creek Stewardship Guide San Luis Obispo County 65 South Main Street Suite 107 Templeton, CA 93465 805.434.0396 ext. 5 www.US-LTRCD.org Acknowledgements The Creek Stewardship Guide for San Luis Obispo County was adapted from the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District’s Stewardship Guide for the Russian River. Text & Technical Review Sotoyome Resource Conservation District, Principal Contributor Melissa Sparks, Principal Contributor National Resource Conservation District, Contributor City of Paso Robles, Contributor Terra Verde Environmental Consulting, Reviewer/Editor Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District, Reviewer/Editor Monterey County Resource Conservation District, Reviewer/Editor San Luis Obispo County Public Works Department, Reviewer/Editor Atascadero Mutual Water Company, Reviewer Photographs Carolyn Berg Terra Verde Environmental Consulting US-LT RCD Design, Editing & Layout Scott Ender Supporting partner: December 2012 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 2 RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 3 WATERSHEDS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 3 Climate 4 Unique & Diverse Watersheds & Sub-Watersheds of San Luis Obispo County 7 Agriculture in San Luis Obispo County Watersheds 8 WHAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP SAN LUIS OBISPO’S CREEKS 9 Prevent & Control Soil Erosion 11 Properly Maintain Unsurfaced Roads and Driveways 13 Restore Native Riparian Vegetation 14 Remove Exotic Species 14 Enhance Instream Habitat 15 Avoid Creating Fish Passage Barriers 15 Conserve Water 16 Control Stormwater Runoff 16 Maintain Septic Systems
    [Show full text]
  • Abies Bracteata Revised 2011 1 Abies Bracteata (D. Don) Poit
    Lead Forest: Los Padres National Forest Forest Service Endemic: No Abies bracteata (D. Don) Poit. (bristlecone fir) Known Potential Synonym: Abies venusta (Douglas ex Hook.) K. Koch; Pinus bracteata D. Don; Pinus venusta Douglas ex Hook (Tropicos 2011). Table 1. Legal or Protection Status (CNDDB 2011, CNPS 2011, and Other Sources). Federal Listing Status; State Heritage Rank California Rare Other Lists Listing Status Plant Rank None; None G2/S2.3 1B.3 USFS Sensitive Plant description: Abies bracteata (Pinaceae) (Fig. 1) is a perennial monoecious plant with trunks longer than 55 m and less than 1.3 m wide. The branches are more-or-less drooping, and the bark is thin. The twigs are glabrous, and the buds are 1-2.5 cm long, sharp-pointed, and non- resinous. The leaves are less than 6 cm long, are dark green, faintly grooved on their upper surfaces, and have tips that are sharply spiny. Seed cones are less than 9 cm long with stalks that are under15 mm long. The cones have bracts that are spreading, exserted, and that are 1.5–4.5 cm long with a slender spine at the apex. Taxonomy: Abies bracteata is a fir species and a member of the pine family (Pinaceae). Out of the fir species growing in North America (Griffin and Critchfield 1976), Abies bracteata has the smallest range and is the least abundant. Identification: Many features of A. bracteata can be used to distinguish this species from other conifers, including the sharp-tipped needles, thin bark, club-shaped crown, non-resinous buds, and exserted spine tipped bracts (Gymnosperms Database 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency Advisory Committee Meeting Regular Meeting March 10, 2021 @ 1:00 P.M
    ARROYO SECO GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING REGULAR MEETING MARCH 10, 2021 @ 1:00 P.M. Attendance and Public Comment Changes Due to COVID-19 The Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency (“ASGSA”) will be conducting its regular meeting on March 10, 2021. Given the current Shelter-in-Place Order covering Monterey County and the Social Distance Guidelines issued by Federal, State, and Local Authorities, the ASGSA has implemented the following changes for attendance and public comment. ATTENDANCE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC The ASGSA meeting to be held on March 10, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. will only be accessible online. The meeting may be viewed through the following options: Please click the link below to join the Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89004294686?pwd=MW4yZ2NVczlpbDcvdFFwQVBVRFgxdz09 Meeting ID: 890 0429 4686 Passcode: 392468 Or iPhone one-tap : US: +16699006833,,89004294686#,,,,*392468# or +12532158782,,89004294686#,,,,*392468# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 929 205 6099 or +1 301 715 8592 Meeting ID: 890 0429 4686 Passcode: 392468 The ASGSA Advisory Committee will also provide links to these viewing options on the City of Greenfield’s website. Unfortunately, physical attendance by the public cannot be accommodated given the current circumstances and the need to ensure the health and safety of the ASGSA Board, staff, and the public as a whole. PUBLIC COMMENTS All public comments, including general public comments, comments on a particular item on the agenda, or comments during a public hearing, must be made by e-mail.
    [Show full text]
  • Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Management Plan
    March 2011 Paso Robles Basin Groundwater Management Plan Submitted to Paso Robles Groundwater Basin –Groundwater Advisory Committee Date: February 2011 V2.0 Project No: 083720 Table of Contents Table of Contents i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Regional Groundwater Management Plan Area 4 1.3 Existing Groundwater Management Activities 5 1.3.1 Master County Water Plan (1998) 6 1.3.2 Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Study (2002) 7 1.3.3 Paso Robles Groundwater Monitoring Program Evaluation (2003) 7 1.3.4 Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Study Phase II – Numerical Model Development, Calibration, and Application (2005) 7 1.3.5 Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Agreement (2005) 7 1.3.6 San Luis Obispo County Region Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (2007) 8 1.3.7 City of Paso Robles Urban Water Management Plan (2007) 9 1.3.8 Water Resources Plan Integration and Capital Improvement Program (2007) 9 1.3.9 Annual Report on the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin (2007) 9 1.3.10 Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Water Banking Feasibility Study (2007) 9 1.3.11 Evaluation of Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Pumping – Water Year 2006 (2009) 10 1.3.12 Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Water Balance Review and Update (2010) 10 1.3.13 San Luis Obispo County Master Water Plan (2010, ongoing) 11 1.3.14 Peer Review of Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Studies 11 1.3.15 Revised Resource Capacity Study – Water Supply in the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin 12 2 Need for Groundwater Management Planning 14 2.1 Legislative Requirements 14 2.2 GMP Components 14 2.3 Purpose and
    [Show full text]
  • San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan
    San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan October 2008 Prepared by the Nacitone Watersheds Steering Committee and Central Coast Salmon Enhancement, Inc. Prepared for the Monterey County Water Resources Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the State Water Resources Control Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendations for use. (This page intentionally left blank) 2 Acknowledgements Facilitation of the Nacitone Watersheds Planning Process was managed by Traci Roberts of the Monterey County Farm Bureau. Stephnie Wald of Central Coast Salmon Enhancement prepared the watershed management plan with grateful assistance of Nicole Smith, Elise Torres, and Sarah Paddack. The preparation of the management plan was guided by Steering Committee Co-chairs Duane Wolgomott and Phil Humphrey. Ken Ekelund of the Monterey County Water Resources Agency managed the SWRCB grant that funded the Nacitone Watersheds Management Plan. Each member of the Steering Committee also contributed valuable information and assistance and is acknowledged below. Ann Beckett, Lockwood resident Marilyn Breland, Heritage Ranch resident Bill Capps, Nacimiento Regional Water Management Advisory Committee Terry Chavis, Heritage Ranch resident Ken Ekelund, Program Manager, Monterey County
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Quality in the Monterey Bay and Salinas Valley Groundwater Basins, California
    U.S. Geological Survey and the California State Water Resources Control Board Groundwater Quality in the Monterey Bay and Salinas Valley Groundwater Basins, California Groundwater provides more than 40 percent of California’s drinking water. To protect this vital resource, the State of California created the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program. The Priority Basin Project of the GAMA Program provides a comprehensive assessment of the State’s groundwater quality and increases public access to groundwater-quality information. The basins around Monterey Bay, and in the Salinas and Paso Robles Valleys, constitute one of the study units being evaluated. The Monterey-Salinas Study Unit Overview of Water Quality The Monterey-Salinas study unit is nearly 1,000 square miles and consists of the Santa Cruz Purisima Formation Highlands, Felton Area, Scotts Valley, Soquel Valley, West Santa Inorganic Organic constituents constituents Cruz Terrace, Salinas Valley, Pajaro Valley, and Carmel Valley groundwater basins (California Department of Water Resources, 2003; Kulongski and Belitz, 2011). These basins were grouped 15 <1 into four study areas based primarily on geography. Groundwater basins in the north were 7 grouped into the Santa Cruz study area, and those to the south were grouped into the Monterey 49 36 Bay, the Salinas Valley, and the Paso Robles study areas (Kulongoski and others, 2007). 93 The study unit has warm, dry summers and cool, moist winters. Average annual rainfall ranges from 31 inches in Santa Cruz in the north to 13 inches in Paso Robles in the south. The study areas are drained by several rivers and their principal tributaries: the Salinas, Pajaro, and CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATIONS Carmel Rivers, and San Lorenzo Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. Introduction
    Chapter 1 Introduction This chapter introduces the Salinas River system and the Salinas River Long-Term Management Plan (LTMP) and identifies its purpose, goals, scope, development process, and organization. The Salinas River provides critical ecosystem benefits and supports a multi-billion dollar regional economy. Key challenges in managing the river and surrounding lands are periodic flooding, streamflow maintenance for agriculture and species habitat, invasive species, poor water quality, loss of riparian vegetation, encroachment on the stream channel, and ad hoc bank stabilization. Various water management facilities along and near the Salinas River, including the largest dams in Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties, are operated by the Monterey County Water Resources Agency (MCWRA). MCWRA also serves as the flood control agency for most of Monterey County. In developing the Salinas River LTMP, MCWRA aims to establish comprehensive solutions to the complex water resource management challenges along the Salinas River. Specifically, the purpose of the LTMP is to provide a multi-benefit management program that addresses the needs of MCWRA facilities and operations, while addressing related issues such as flood risk reduction, water supply, water quality, natural resource conservation, threatened and endangered species management, and compliance with the federal and state environmental laws, including Endangered Species Acts. The geographic scope of this LTMP is limited to the portion of the Salinas River watershed in which MCWRA conducts management activities. Management actions under the LTMP broadly include water supply management, groundwater recharge, flood management, and riverine habitat enhancement and restoration. The LTMP is not subject to a specific (e.g., 20- or 30-year) planning horizon—instead, it is intended to remain flexible to guide both short- and long-term management needs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-05-27 NPC Agenda Packet
    NACIMIENTO PROJECT COMMISSION MEMBERS: CITY OF PASO ROBLES, TEMPLETON CSD, ATASCADERO MWC, CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, SLO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Notice of Regular Meeting NACIMIENTO PROJECT COMMISSION SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT THURS., MAY 27, 2021 – 4:00 PM ---------------------------------------------------------------- Phone line: +1 (646) 749-3122 Access Code: 565-881-053 Webinar: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/565881053 Public comments can be submitted to: [email protected] For more information: https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Forms- Documents/Committees-Programs/Nacimiento-Project-Commission.aspx Chair: Grigger Jones; Vice-Chair: Andy Pease AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER (Roll Call, Quorum Count & Flag Salute) II. PUBLIC COMMENT *Non-agenda items within Commission jurisdiction; subject to three-minute limit each. III. MEETING MINUTES (Recommend Approval) A. Naci Commission, April 22, 2021 IV. COMMISSION INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (No Action Required): None A. Utilities Division Manager’s Report B. Third Quarter Operations Budget Report – FY 2020-21 C. Report on Board Action Concerning Shandon-San Juan WD’s Water Right Applications V. PRESENTATIONS (No Action Required): None VI. COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS (No Subsequent Action by BOS Required): None VII. COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS (Action Subsequently Required by BOS): None VIII. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS DESIRED BY COMMISSION Next Commission Meeting: Aug 26, 2021 ATTACHMENTS 1. Naci Commission Minutes – April 22, 2021 2. Item IV.A – Staff Report 3. Item IV.B – Staff Report 4. Item IV.C – Staff Report CONTACT: All Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations shall be promptly reviewed and resolved. Persons who require accommodations for any audio, visual or other disability in order to review an agenda, or to participate in the meeting per the ADA, are encouraged to request such accommodation 48 hours in advance of the meeting from Wes Thomson at (805) 781-5252.
    [Show full text]