DOCSLIB.ORG

Airprox Incidents Involving Aircraft Arriving at Or Leaving Heathrow

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airprox Incidents Involving Aircraft Arriving at Or Leaving Heathrow Corporate Communications External Information Services 6 August 2014 FOIA reference: F0002014 Dear XXXX I am writing in respect of your recent request dated 26 July 2014, for the release of information held by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). Your request: 1. All official 'near misses' involving civil aircraft both arriving and leaving at Heathrow from 1st January 2004 to July 25th 2014 2.. Any incidents relating to permanent or temporary technical failure while airborne on both take-off and approach for landing, which could have potentially endangered life from 1st January 2004 to July 25th 2014. This would include engine failure, landing gear failure, structural integrity etc. Our response: Having considered your request in line with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), we are pleased to be able to provide the information below. Incident reports are provided to the CAA under the terms of the Mandatory Occurrence Reporting (MOR) scheme, as described under Article 226 of the Air Navigation Order 2009 (ANO). Each report made is reviewed and, where appropriate, further investigation carried out and action taken. 1. We have searched the UK CAA database for all occurrences that have involved an Airprox (official ‘near miss’ subject to a review by the UK Airprox Board) inside UK controlled airspace during the period 1 January 2004 to all processed reports as at 25 July 2014 for an aircraft (regardless of nationality) which has either departed London Heathrow or was en route to London Heathrow and provided the information in attachment one. Civil Aviation Authority Aviation House GW Gatwick Airport South Crawley West Sussex England RH6 0YR www.caa.co.uk Telephone 01293 768512 [email protected] Page 2 The UK Airprox Board (UKAB) separately collects reports of Airprox incidents and produces a regular review of assessed Airprox incidents, which can be found at http://www.airproxboard.org.uk). Details of completed investigations can be found through the following links: http://www.airproxboard.org.uk/default.aspx?catid=423&pagetype=90&pageid=5638 http://www.airproxboard.org.uk/default.aspx?catid=423&pagetype=68&gid=430 2. In order to provide data relating to general structural integrity or significant engine failures we have also searched the CAA database for any incident which has been classified as either an accident or a serious incident where the primary error has been assessed as a technical malfunction whilst the aircraft (regardless of nationality) is airborne either during take-off or approach for landing between the dates 1 January 2004 to all processed reports as at 25 July 2014 and provided a summary of those reports (see attachment two). We have, however, removed identifying information from these reports as this information is exempt from disclosure under Section 44 (1) (a) of the FOIA. Section 44 (1) (a) of the FOIA provides that information is exempt information if its disclosure is prohibited by, or under, any enactment. Under Section 23 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982, information which relates to a particular person (which includes a company or organisation) and has been supplied to the CAA pursuant to an ANO is prohibited from disclosure (a copy of this exemption can be found below). For more information about the Mandatory Occurrence Reporting scheme, please refer to CAP382 which can be found at www.caa.co.uk/cap382. If you are not satisfied with how we have dealt with your request in the first instance you should approach the CAA in writing at:- Mark Stevens External Response Manager Civil Aviation Authority Aviation House Gatwick Airport South West Sussex RH6 0YR [email protected] The CAA has a formal internal review process for dealing with appeals or complaints in connection with Freedom of Information requests. The key steps in this process are set in the attachment. Page 3 Should you remain dissatisfied with the outcome you have a right under Section 50 of the Freedom of Information Act to appeal against the decision by contacting the Information Commissioner at:- Information Commissioner’s Office FOI/EIR Complaints Resolution Wycliffe House Water Lane Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk/complaints.aspx Should you wish to make further Freedom of Information requests, please use the e-form at http://www.caa.co.uk/foi. Yours sincerely Rick Chatfield Information Rights and Enquiries Officer Page 4 CAA INTERNAL REVIEW & COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE . The original case to which the appeal or complaint relates is identified and the case file is made available; . The appeal or complaint is allocated to an Appeal Manager, the appeal is acknowledged and the details of the Appeal Manager are provided to the applicant; . The Appeal Manager reviews the case to understand the nature of the appeal or complaint, reviews the actions and decisions taken in connection with the original case and takes account of any new information that may have been received. This will typically require contact with those persons involved in the original case and consultation with the CAA Legal Department; . The Appeal Manager concludes the review and, after consultation with those involved with the case, and with the CAA Legal Department, agrees on the course of action to be taken; . The Appeal Manager prepares the necessary response and collates any information to be provided to the applicant; . The response and any necessary information is sent to the applicant, together with information about further rights of appeal to the Information Commissioners Office, including full contact details. Page 5 Freedom of Information Act: Section 44 (1) Information is exempt information if its disclosure (otherwise than under this Act) by the public authority holding it- (a) is prohibited by or under any enactment, (b) is incompatible with any Community obligation, or (c) would constitute or be punishable as a contempt of court. (2) The duty to confirm or deny does not arise if the confirmation or denial that would have to be given to comply with section 1(1)(a) would (apart from this Act) fall within any of paragraphs (a) to (c) of subsection (1). File number UTC date Occurrence Make/mdl/srs [Make] Flight phase Phase of Flight Headline class 200401531 14/03/2004 Accident AGUSTA Take-off Initial climb Heavy landing due to tail rotor driveshaft failure. Substantial damage. No injury to 2 POB. AAIB Field investigation. 200400018 05/01/2004 Accident PIPER Take-off Initial climb Engine failure after take off. Aircraft damaged during forced landing. No injury to 1 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200400101 06/01/2004 Serious ENSTROM Take-off Initial climb Low Frequency (LF) vibration felt at 1000ft. incident Aircraft returned. Nr4 tail rotor driveshaft bearing failed. AAIB Field investigation. 200400166 09/01/2004 Accident BAE Landing Landing AAIB Initial Notification : NLG failed to deploy. Aircraft landed with nose supported by the open NLG doors. Passengers evacuated. 200401579 14/03/2004 Serious BAE Take-off Take-off Unable to lock flight deck door. Door hinge incident bracket failed. 200402145 07/04/2004 Accident RAYTHEON Landing Landing Aircraft departed runway on landing, struck a number of obstacles and was destroyed. No injury to 1 POB. AAIB Fieldinvestigation. 200402195 12/04/2004 Accident DIAMOND Take-off Initial climb Engine ran roughly and produced smoke during climb out from touch and go. Aircraft relanded but departed runway, damaging landing gear. No injury to 1 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200402268 13/04/2004 Accident FOURNIER Landing Main wheel failed to fully extend and collapsed on landing. Substantial damage. No injury to 1 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200402981 13/05/2004 Accident OTHER Landing Landing AAIB Initial Notification: Skyranger 582(1) microlight NLG collapsed during precautionary landing due to rough running engine. Substantial damage. No injuries to 2 POB. Subject to BMAA investigation. 200403006 13/05/2004 Accident OTHER Take-off Initial climb AAIB Initial Notification: Thruster T300 microlight made heavy landing following engine failure after take-off. Tail separated. No injury to 1 POB. Subject to BMAA investigation. 200400362 21/01/2004 Accident PIPER Landing Landing RH MLG collapsed during landing run. Substantial damage. No injuries to 3 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200400563 30/01/2004 Accident PIPER Landing Landing NLG collapsed on landing. No injury to 1 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200403842 14/06/2004 Accident AVID Take-off Initial climb Engine stopped during climb. Aircraft crashed and lodged in tree on approach to field for forced landing. Minor injury to 1 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200403873 15/06/2004 Accident CESSNA Landing Landing LH MLG collapsed during landing roll. Substantial damage.No injury to 2 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200404037 22/06/2004 Accident PIPER Landing Landing Landing gear collapsed on landing. No injury to 1 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200404169 27/06/2004 Accident CESSNA Take-off Initial climb Engine lost power in climb. During attempted forced landing aircraft struck trees and crashed. Aircraft destroyed. 6 POB - 4 fatalities, 2 serious injuries. AAIB Field investigation. 200404189 27/06/2004 Accident OTHER Take-off Initial climb X'AIR V2(2) microlight inverted during forced landing following engine failure on climb out. Substantial damage. Noinjuries to 2 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200404211 29/06/2004 Accident PIPER Landing Landing Unable to obtain three greens. Aircraft had to land with NLG not fully locked down. Damage to NLG and propeller. Noinjury to 1 POB. AAIB AARF investigation. 200400683 29/01/2004 Accident BAE Landing Landing AAIB Initial Notification: Nose landing gear failed to extend. Structural damage to nose and both propellers. Subject to NTSB investigation. 200400741 09/02/2004 Accident DASSAULT Landing Landing RH MLG partially retracted and aircraft departed runway on landing following diversion due to hydraulic failure. Substantial damage.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mcdonnell Douglas (Boeing) MD-83
    Right MLG failure on landing, Douglas (Boeing) MD-83, EC-FXI Micro-summary: The right main landing gear of this Douglas (Boeing) MD-83 failed immediately on landing. Event Date: 2001-05-10 at 1232 UTC Investigative Body: Aircraft Accident Investigation Board (AAIB), United Kingdom Investigative Body's Web Site: http://www.aaib.dft.gov/uk/ Note: Reprinted by kind permission of the AAIB. Cautions: 1. Accident reports can be and sometimes are revised. Be sure to consult the investigative agency for the latest version before basing anything significant on content (e.g., thesis, research, etc). 2. Readers are advised that each report is a glimpse of events at specific points in time. While broad themes permeate the causal events leading up to crashes, and we can learn from those, the specific regulatory and technological environments can and do change. Your company's flight operations manual is the final authority as to the safe operation of your aircraft! 3. Reports may or may not represent reality. Many many non-scientific factors go into an investigation, including the magnitude of the event, the experience of the investigator, the political climate, relationship with the regulatory authority, technological and recovery capabilities, etc. It is recommended that the reader review all reports analytically. Even a "bad" report can be a very useful launching point for learning. 4. Contact us before reproducing or redistributing a report from this anthology. Individual countries have very differing views on copyright! We can advise you on the steps to follow. Aircraft Accident Reports on DVD, Copyright © 2006 by Flight Simulation Systems, LLC All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Technical Memorandum 78743
    NASA Technical Memorandum 78743 (SASA-Y!!*-’767U3) STBUCTOEAL CCVCZP?S AY3 Y75-140,pC EXEEFI!IE.d’IAL CCNSI8EEP.TiOYS FCE A VERSATTIE FiIGI?-S?Z’3D FESflfitP. RIRPLANE (Y3SE) a0 ,C 9C AOS/!4F A01 CSCL OlC Jnclas G3/05 41008 STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS AND EXPERIENTAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR A VERSATILE HIGH-SPEED RESEARCH AIRPLANE L, ROBERT JACKSON, F, S, KIRKHAM, AND J, P, WEIDHER NOVEMBER 1978 Naliona; ASronaLiks arid Space Admini.;tral;on Langley Research Center Hampton Virqinia 23665 STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS AND EXPERIWNTAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR A VERSATILE HIGH-SPEED RESEARCH AIRPLANE by L. Robert Jackson, F. S. Kirkham, and J. P. Weidner .-uture aircraft my achieve flight speeds to Mach 10 ana bum hydrogen fuel. This speed range and cryogenic fuel wiil impose new demands on the airframe, requiring new materials and structural concepts to result in viable payloads. To enable timely application of advances in structures technclogy at least risk, large representative structwal comoonents will require testing in the increasingly severe flight environments. To accomplish useful flight tests and demonstrations, a versatile, high-speed research zirplane has been studied at Langley Research Center. Some objectives of this study are to define a research airplane concept that is capable of testing realistic size components of pertinent future structures at 1-ast expenditure of resources. Reported herein are experimental considerations for a hypersonic research airplane, a means of achieving versatile research capability, a discussion of alternative thermal protection systems, and a definition of the structure and thermal protection system selected ;or the high-speed research airplane. The study has identified a near-art structure and thermal protection system and a mans of dChieVing research ve!.satility for a high-speed research airplane.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilt Rotor Research Aircraft Familiarization Document
    '. NASA TECHNICAL NASA TMX-62.407 MEMORANDUM -PTING Y. a c NASA/ARMY TILT ROTOR RESEARCH AIRCRAFT FAMILIARIZATION DOCUMENT Prepared by .Tilt Rotor Project Office .. .. -\ Coordinated by Martin Maid .. Ames Research Center ._ I rJ - ,.. -1 and , 1-1 c. U.S. Amy Air Mobility R&D Laboratory %\\-'?. \ Moffett Field, Calif. 94035 .-, 7 / --_ ---*_ c-, : January 1975 NASMARMY XV-15 TILT ROTOR RESEARCH AIRCRAFT FAMl LIARIZATION DOCUMENT Prepared by: Tilt Rotor Research Aircraft Project Office Staff Coordinated by: Martin D. Maisel Tilt Rotor Research Aircraft Project Office Approved by : - Dean C. Borgman Deputy Manager, Technical Tilt Rotor Research Aircraft Project Office David D. Few Manager Tilt Rotor Research Aircraft Project Office 1. Report No. 2. Ganmnmt hionNo. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. TM X-62,407 4. Titlr md Subtitlo 5. Rqwn D~te NASA/ARMY XV-15 TILT ROTOR RESEARCH AIRCRAFT FAMILIARIZATION DOCUMENT 7. Author(s) 8. PerformingOrgnizrtion Report No. Prepared by Tilt Rotor Project Office Staff, A-5870 coordinated by Martin Maisel 10. Work Unit No. 9. paforming ororriatia, "and MdNI 744-01-01 NASA Ames Research Center and 11. Canmct or Grant No. U.S. Army Air Mobility R&D Laboratory Moffett Field, Calif. 94035 13. Typ of RIpon and hid &ard 12. -nuring N.m md Addnr Technical Memorandum National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1;. Sponsoring Agmcy Code Washington, D.C. 20546 16. Abmrcr , The design features and general characteristics of the NASA/Army XV-15 Tilt Rotor Research Aircraft are described. This aircraft was conceived as a proof-of-concept vehicle and a V/STOL research tool for integrated wind tunnel, flight-simulation, and flight-test investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • DCS Mig-15Bis Guide
    DCS GUIDE By Chuck MiG-15BIS LAST UPDATED: 16/04/2019 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS • PART 1 – CONTROLS SETUP • PART 2 – COCKPIT & GAUGES • PART 3 – START-UP PROCEDURE • PART 4 – TAKEOFF • PART 5 – LANDING • PART 6 – ENGINE & FUEL MANAGEMENT • PART 7 – AIRCRAFT LIMITATIONS • PART 8 – AIRCRAFT OPERATION • PART 9 – HOW TO BE COMBAT READY • PART 10 – SKINS • PART 11 – RSI-6K HF RADIO TUTORIAL • PART 12 – K-7 ARK-5 RADIO NAVIGATION • PART 13 – TACTICS AGAINST THE F-86F • PART 14 – OTHER SOURCES Special thanks to Paul "Goldwolf" Whittingham for creating the guide icons. 2 These controls should be mapped to your joystick and are essential. Names on the left column are what you should look for in the “ACTION” column of the Controls Setup 15BIS 15BIS - Menu in DCS. Description of the action is on the right column. MIG FAGOT • MICROPHONE BUTTON ALLOWS YOU TO USE RADIO MENU WHILE FLYING • ASP-3N GUNSIGHT TARGET DISTANCE, DECREASE/INCREASE DECREASE/INCREASE GUNSIGHT TARGET RANGE • ASP-3N GUNSIGHT TARGET WINGSPAN, DECREASE/INCREASE DECREASE/INCREASE GUNSIGHT TARGET WINGSPAN • AILERON TRIMMER SWITCH, LEFT/RIGHT TRIM AILERON LEFT/RIGHT (THERE IS NO RUDDER TRIM) • AIRBRAKE SWITCH, CLOSE/OPEN OPENS/CLOSES AIRBRAKES • ELEVATOR TRIMMER SWITCH, PULL (CLIMB)/PUSH (DESCEND) TRIM ELEVATOR UP OR DOWN • ENGINE START BUTTON – PUSH TO START ENGINE STARTER • GUNS SAFETY COVER GUNS SAFETY SWITCH • LANDING GEAR HANDLE, UP/DOWN RAISES OR LOWERS LANDING GEAR • N-37D CANNON FIRE BUTTON FIRES 37 MM CANNON • NR-23 CANNON FIRE BUTTON FIRES 23 MM CANNON • WINGS FLAPS HANDLE, UP/DOWN LOWERS OR RAISES FLAPS BY INCREMENTS CONTROLS SETUP – • WEAPONS RELEASE BUTTON DROPS BOMBS OR OTHER ORDNANCE • WHEEL BRAKE ON PUTS ON THE BRAKE (LIKE A CAR BRAKE) • ZOOM IN SLOW ALLOWS YOU TO ZOOM IN PART 1PART • ZOOM OUT SLOW ALLOWS YOU TO ZOOM OUT 3 15BIS 15BIS - MIG FAGOT TO ASSIGN AXIS, CLICK ON AXIS ASSIGN.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Capacity Oblique All-Wing Transport Aircraft
    f Large Capacity Oblique All-Wing Transport Aircraft Thomas L. Galloway James A. Phillips Robert A. Kennelly, Jr. NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA Mr. Mark H. Waters Thermosciences Institute, ELORET Corp. Palo Alto, CA Transportation Beyond 2000: Engineering Design for the Future September 26-28, 1995 461 INTRODUCTION Dr. R. T. Jones first developed the theory for oblique wing aircraft in 1952, and in subsequent years numerous analytical and experimental projects conducted at NASA Ames and elsewhere have established that the Jones' oblique wing theory is correct. Until the late 1980's all proposed oblique wing configurations were wing/body aircraft with the wing mounted on a pivot. With the emerging requirement for commercial transports with very large payloads, 450 - 800 passengers, Jones proposed a supersonic oblique flying wing in 1988. For such an aircraft all payload, fuel, and systems are carded within the wing, and the wing is designed with a variable sweep to maintain a fixed subsonic normal Mach number. Engines and vertical tails are mounted on pivots supported from the primary structure of the wing. The oblique flying wing transport has come to be known as the Oblique All-Wing transport (OAW). Initial studies of the OAW were conducted by Van der Velden first at U.C. Berkeley(l) in 1989 and then at Stanford in collaboration with Kroo(2) in 1990. A final document summarizing this work is given in the thesis by Van der Velden(3). Many issues regarding the design were identified in these studies, among them the need for the OAW to be an unstable aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Instruction Manual
    INSTRUCTION MANUAL ™ Top Flite Models Champaign, IL Ph: (217) 398-8970, Ext. 5 Fax: (217) 398-7721 [email protected] WARRANTY SPECIFICATIONS Top Flite® Model Manufacturing Co. guarantees this kit to be free from defects in both material and Wingspan: 86 in [2185mm] workmanship at the date of purchase. This warranty does not cover any component parts damaged by use or modification. In no case shall Top Flite’s liability exceed the original cost of the purchased kit. Wing Area: 1276 in 2 [82.3 dm2] Further, Top Flite reserves the right to change or modify this warranty without notice. In that Top Flite has no control over the final assembly or material used for final assembly, no liability shall be Weight: 25.5 – 27.5 lb assumed nor accepted for any damage resulting from the use by the user of the final user-assembled [11.56–12.47 kg] product. By the act of using the user-assembled product, the user accepts all resulting liability. 2 If the buyer is not prepared to accept the liability associated with the use of this product, the buyer is Wing 46 – 50 oz/ft Loading: 2 advised to return this kit immediately in new and unused condition to the place of purchase. [140 –153 g/dm ] To make a warranty claim send Hobby Services Length: 70.5 in [1790 mm] the defective part or item to 3002 N. Apollo Dr. Suite 1 Hobby Services at this address: Champaign IL 61822 USA Radio: 7 minimum Include a letter stating your name, return shipping address, as much contact information as possible (daytime telephone number, fax number, e-mail address), a detailed description of the problem and a photocopy of the Engine: 3.0 – 3.6 cu in [50 – 60cc] purchase receipt.
    [Show full text]
  • ATINER's Conference Paper Series IND2013-0819
    ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: IND2013-0819 Athens Institute for Education and Research ATINER ATINER's Conference Paper Series IND2013-0819 Optimally Adaptive Oleo Strut Damping for Aircraft and UAV Using MR Fluid Ajinkya A. Gharapurkar Graduate Research Assistant Dept. of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Concordia University Canada Chandra B. Asthana Affiliate Associate Professor Dept. of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Concordia University Canada Rama B. Bhat Professor Dept. of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Concordia University, Canada 1 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: IND2013-0819 Athens Institute for Education and Research 8 Valaoritou Street, Kolonaki, 10671 Athens, Greece Tel: + 30 210 3634210 Fax: + 30 210 3634209 Email: [email protected] URL: www.atiner.gr URL Conference Papers Series: www.atiner.gr/papers.htm Printed in Athens, Greece by the Athens Institute for Education and Research. All rights reserved. Reproduction is allowed for non-commercial purposes if the source is fully acknowledged. ISSN 2241-2891 23/1/2014 2 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: IND2013-0819 An Introduction to ATINER's Conference Paper Series ATINER started to publish this conference papers series in 2012. It includes only the papers submitted for publication after they were presented at one of the conferences organized by our Institute every year. The papers published in the series have not been refereed and are published as they were submitted by the author. The series serves two purposes. First, we want to disseminate the information as fast as possible. Second, by doing so, the authors can receive comments useful to revise their papers before they are considered for publication in one of ATINER's books, following our standard procedures of a blind review.
    [Show full text]
  • T-45C Aircraft
    VIRTUAL NATOPS FLIGHT MANUAL NAVY MODEL T-45C AIRCRAFT for Microsoft Flight Simulator by IndiaFoxtEcho Visual Simulations Version 1.00 – March 2021 NOTICE – Although this manual and the simulated aircraft closerly resemble their real-world counterparts in many aspects, neither should be used as source of real-world information about the aircraft. This package is not endorsed or supported by The Boeing Company or by the United States Navy. CHANGE LOG VERSION 1.10 22-Mar-2021 - Redone external engine sounds - Replaced internal engine sound main loop sample - Fixed bug preventing setting the CRS on TACAN (Nav2) - Created "Lite" versions of all aircrafts, with simplified XML code and geometry - Implemented VR mouse collision model - Fixed environmental occlusion geometry - Fixed missing details in rear cockpit harnessing - Fixed bug causing cockpit sounds from other T-45 to play in multiplayer - Fixed formation light switch INOP - Fixed bug causing the HUD throttle indicator not to work - Fixed external lights not working after Sim Update 3 - Changed animation of retractable footstep so that automatically retracts when the canopy closes - Changed HUD ILS logic so that ILS steering bar will only show if ILS is selected on the HSI-MFD - Added TAWS Below Glideslope warning - Added TAWS Check Gear warning - Added TAWS Power Power warning INITIAL RELEASE 8-Mar-2021 WELCOME The T-45 Goshawk is a fully carrier-capable version of the British Aerospace Hawk Mk.60. It was developed as a jet flight trainer for the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps. The Hawk had not originally been designed to perform carrier operations; numerous modifications were required, such as the extensive strengthening of the airframe to withstand the excessive forces imposed by the stresses involved in catapult launches and high sink-rate landings, both scenarios being routine in aircraft carrier operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pietenpol Gary Wolf
    January - February 2007 Recreational Aircraft Association Canada www.raa.ca The Voice of Canadian Amateur Aircraft Builders $6.95 The Incredible Pietenpol Gary Wolf RAA SGM AND AGM self requires one before signing that it is fit for flight. Even Mark your calendars early for two special days. March the manufacturer’s DS 10141 statement is not inspected by 24th will be a free day for RAA national members to visit the Transport, or by anyone for that matter. Toronto Aerospace Museum in Downsview (Toronto), cour- The Working Group proposal to Transport included a tesy of Paul and Sean Fleming at Aircraft Spruce Canada. recommendation that the AULA category be changed so There will also be a brief meeting to pass a motion to alter that manufacturer‚ paperwork would be fully inspected the bylaws to allow RAA to accept donations and issue tax before they could sell any more planes. On this basis, their receipts. This Special General Meeting of the Membership new production would receive a Special C of A, equal to (SGM) will be a brief meeting at noon, and we can then get that awarded to Amateur-Built aircraft that have been back to touring the Lancaster project, the Arrow, and the fully inspected by MD-RA. Unfortunately when the deci- other planes on display at this historic Museum. sion record came out, it included an unexpected clause that The July 1st weekend will be the RAA AGM, hosted would allow the owners of any existing AULA’s to receive by Chapter 85 in Delta BC, in conjunction with their fly- a Special C of A just by asking for one.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Airplane Performance Prof. AK Ghosh Department Of
    NOC: Introduction to Airplane Performance Prof. A. K. Ghosh Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Module - 01 Lecture - 03 Introduction to airplane and its components (Refer Slide Time: 00:09) This is Sinus 912 aircraft which is a motor glider and its manufacturer is Pipistrel. So, we will today we will discuss about the structure and the instrument panel of this motor glider. This is an all made its construction is of composite material. This is the spinner of the aircraft having a 2 bladed propeller which is vireo. Then, it has a rotex 912 engine installed in it which is a 4 cylinder engine and it is a piston engine 4 stroke. Moving ahead we come to the wing. This is the starboard wing of the aircraft which is containing a pitot tube. This is the pitot tube which senses the pitot pressure and the static pressure from the static veins located just beneath it. It senses the dynamic pressure and gives to the pitot instruments like ASI, altimeter and vertical speed indicator. (Refer Slide Time: 00:59) Then, it has a wing span of 15 meters. For this wing contains a flaperon. Normally all aircrafts have either aileron and a flap, but in this varying motor glider the 2 control surfaces are combined in one and then that is of flaperon which consist of a flap and aileron that helps in rolling and as well as at the time of takeoff and landing. (Refer Slide Time: 01:24) So, this is the impeller section of the aircraft this is the tail section which consist of the vertical stabilizer, the horizontal stabilizer; attached to it is the moving part that is the elevator and the rudder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wing Is the Principal Structural Unit of the Airplane. It Has Several Functions Beyond That of Providing Lift. for a Wing To
    1 WING The wing is the principal structural unit of the airplane. It has several functions beyond that of providing lift. For a wing to produce "lift", it must be oriented at a suitable angle of attack relative to the flow of air past the wing. In aerodynamics, angle of attack (AOA) specifies the angle between the chord line of the wing of a fixed-wing aircraft and the vector representing the relative motion between the aircraft and the atmosphere. On larger airplanes the engines are mounted in nacelles either attached to the wing or mounted in the wing. The nacelles also provide a housing for the landing gear when it is retracted. The space within the wing is usually used for fuel storage. The main geometrical features of a wing are its span; the area of the wing; its dihedral angle; its sweepback angle; and the wing section. Dihedral angle is the upward angle of an aircraft's wing, from the wing root to the wing tip. The amount of dihedral determines the amount of inherent stability along the roll axis. Although an increase of dihedral will increase inherent stability, it will also decrease lift, and increase drag. The design of the wing depends on the size, weight, and use of the airplane. Generally, there are two kinds of wing design: cantilever and semi-cantilever. The semi-cantilever usually has one, or perhaps two, supporting wires or struts attached to each wing and the fuselage. As far as the internal structure is concerned, there are three general types of conventional wings: monospar, two-spar, and multispar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Way We Were Part 1 By: Donna Ryan
    The Way We Were Part 1 By: Donna Ryan The Early Years – 1954- 1974 Early Years Overview - The idea for the Chapter actually got started in June of 1954, when a group of Convair engineers got together over coffee at the old La Mesa airport. The four were Bjorn Andreasson, Frank Hernandez, Ladislao Pazmany, and Ralph Wilcox. - The group applied for a Chapter Charter which was granted two years later, on October 5, 1956. - Frank Hernandez was Chapter President for the first seven years of the Chapter, ably assisted by Ralph Wilcox as the Vice President. Frank later served as VP as well. The first four first flights of Chapter members occurred in 1955 and 1957. They were: Lloyd Paynter – Corbin; Sam Ursham - Air Chair; Frank Hernandez - Rapier 65; and Waldo Waterman - Aerobile. - A folder in our archives described the October 15-16, 1965 Ramona Fly-in which was sponsored by our chapter. Features: -Flying events: Homebuilts, antiques, replicas, balloon burst competition and spot landing competitions. - John Thorp was the featured speaker. - Aerobatic display provided by John Tucker in a Starduster. - Awards given: Static Display; Safety; Best Workmanship; Balloon Burst; Aircraft Efficiency; Spot Landings. According to an article published in 1997, in 1969 we hosted a fly-In in Ramona that drew 16,000 people. Some Additional Dates, Numbers, Activities June 1954: 7 members. First meeting was held at the old La Mesa Airport. 1958: 34 members. First Fly-in was held at Gillespie Field. 1964: 43 members. Had our first Chapter project: ten PL-2’s were begun by ten Chapter 14 members.
    [Show full text]