Rethinking the History of European Level Merger Control. a Critical Political Economy Perspective

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rethinking the History of European Level Merger Control. a Critical Political Economy Perspective Rethinking the history of European level merger control. A critical political economy perspective Hubert Buch-Hansen Supervisor: Morten Ougaard Department of Intercultural Communication and Management CBS 2 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1. THE PURPOSE OF THE THESIS .......................................................................................................................... 10 1.2. OUTLINE OF THE THESIS ................................................................................................................................. 13 1.3. SOURCES ........................................................................................................................................................ 15 1.4. INTENDED CONTRIBUTIONS ............................................................................................................................ 18 2. BEYOND RATIONALISM AND CONSTRUCTIVISM: THE CRITICAL REALIST ALTERNATIVE .. 20 2.1. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ................................................................................................................................ 20 2.2. THE RATIONALIST PARADIGM IN EU STUDIES ................................................................................................. 27 2.3. THE CONSTRUCTIVIST PARADIGM IN EU STUDIES ........................................................................................... 32 2.4. BRINGING IN CRITICAL REALISM ..................................................................................................................... 38 2.5. FROM PHILOSOPHY TO THEORY ... ................................................................................................................... 44 2.6. CONCLUDING REMARKS ................................................................................................................................. 49 3. THEORISING REGULATION. A CRITICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE ....................... 50 3.1. CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES IN EU STUDIES ........................................................................................................ 50 3.2. CAPITALISM AND COMPETITION ..................................................................................................................... 53 3.3. AGENCY : CLASS AND BEYOND ........................................................................................................................ 57 3.4. REGULATION AND IDEAS ................................................................................................................................ 60 3.5. STATES AND SUPRANATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ................................................................................................. 66 3.6. PROGRAMMING INSTITUTIONS ........................................................................................................................ 70 3.7. PUTTING THEORY TO WORK ............................................................................................................................ 74 3.8. CONCLUDING REMARKS ................................................................................................................................. 77 4. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A EUROPEAN LEVEL COMPETITION UNIT OF REGULATION ......... 79 4.1. EMBEDDED LIBERALISM ................................................................................................................................. 79 4.2. COMPETITION POLICY IN GERMANY ’S “SOCIAL MARKET ECONOMY” ............................................................. 82 4.3. COMPETITION POLICY IN FRANCE ’S STATE -LED FORM OF CAPITALISM ........................................................... 84 4.4. THE FIRST STEP : COMPETITION POLICY AND THE ECSC TREATY .................................................................... 88 4.5. THE NEXT STEP : COMPETITION POLICY AND THE EC TREATY ......................................................................... 99 4.6. REGULATION 17 ........................................................................................................................................... 106 4.7. IN CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................ 109 5. THE 1960 AND 1970S: MERGER CONTROL IN THE ERA OF EMBEDDED LIBERALISM .............. 114 5.1. EMBEDDED LIBERALISM AND THE AMERICAN CHALLENGE .......................................................................... 114 5.2. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION IN THE 1960 S AND 1970 S ..................................................................................... 119 5.3. MERGER CONTROL IN FRANCE AND GERMANY ............................................................................................ 122 5.4. MERGER CONTROL IN THE UK ...................................................................................................................... 128 5.5. EC MERGER CONTROL ? ................................................................................................................................ 132 5.6. THE STAGNATION OF THE EC COMPETITION UNIT OF REGULATION ............................................................... 141 5.7. IN CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................ 144 6. THE 1980S: THE NEOLIBERAL TURN AND THE EC MERGER CONTROL REGULATION ........... 148 6.1. THE CRISIS OF EMBEDDED LIBERALISM ......................................................................................................... 148 6.2. THE NEOLIBERAL TURN AND NATIONAL MERGER CONTROL .......................................................................... 150 6.3. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND THE ERT ...................................................................................................... 153 6.4. THE REVITALISATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF THE EC COMPETITION UNIT OF REGULATION ................... 158 6.5. MOVING TOWARDS AN EC MERGER REGULATION ........................................................................................ 162 6.6. THE CHANGED POSITION OF CAPITAL ACTORS .............................................................................................. 168 6.7. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EC MERGER SUB -UNIT OF REGULATION ........................................................... 179 6.8. IN CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................ 189 3 7. THE 1990S AND ONWARDS: MERGER CONTROL IN THE ERA OF NEOLIBERAL HEGEMONY 192 7.1. NEOLIBERALISM AND THE TRANSNATIONALISATION OF CAPITAL ................................................................. 192 7.2. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION IN THE 1990 S ONWARDS ....................................................................................... 197 7.3. EC COMPETITION REGULATION IN NEOLIBERAL TIMES ................................................................................. 201 7.4. THE “MODERNISATION ” OF REGULATION 17 ................................................................................................ 210 7.5. THE “E UROPEANISATION ” OF NATIONAL MERGER CONTROL ........................................................................ 215 7.6. EC MERGER REGULATION IN THE 1990 S ONWARDS ...................................................................................... 222 7.7. REFORMING THE EC MERGER SUBUNIT OF REGULATION .............................................................................. 232 7.8. IN CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................ 247 7.9. POSTSCRIPT : CHALLENGES TO NEOLIBERAL COMPETITION REGULATION ...................................................... 249 8. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 256 8.1. THE HISTORY OF EUROPEAN LEVEL MERGER CONTROL : SUMMARISING THE ARGUMENT .............................. 256 8.2. REFLECTIONS ON THE HISTORY OF EUROPEAN LEVEL MERGER CONTROL ..................................................... 263 8.3. THEORISING THE EVOLUTION OF EC COMPETITION POLICY : THE EXISTING LITERATURE .............................. 270 8.4. COMPETITION AND COMPETITION POLICY : AN ALTERNATIVE AGENDA ......................................................... 274 9. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................... 283 9.1. LEGAL SOURCES (CHRONOLOGICALLY ORDERED ) ........................................................................................ 303 10. APPENDIXES ..................................................................................................................................................... 304 APPENDIX I: ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................... 304 APPENDIX II: COMMISSIONERS OF COMPETITION 1958-2008 ....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • RUG/DNPP/Repository/Boeken
    Het najagen van een illusie? De PvdA en Europa Gerrit Voerman De PvdA is van meet af aan voorstander geweest van de Europese integratie. Daarbij speelden zowel politieke als economische overwegingen een rol: het ging erom de aartsvijanden Duitsland en Frankrijk met elkaar te verzoenen en de groei van de welvaart te bevorderen door het slechten van handelsbarrières in West-Europa. Anno 2016 zijn deze motieven voor de PvdA nog steeds lei- dend. De voortschrijdende supranationale samenwerking wordt als een garantie gezien voor vrede, politieke stabiliteit en welvaart op het Europese continent. Naast politieke en economische beweegredenen had de PvdA op het Euro- pese vlak echter ook een uitgesproken ideologisch geïnspireerde doelstelling. In 1950, toen het proces van de Europese integratie daadwerkelijk op gang kwam, legde de partij een duidelijk verband tussen de totstandkoming van een Europe- se federatie en de verwezenlijking van een op democratisch-socialistische leest geschoeide maatschappij. ‘Geen socialisme zonder Europa. Geen Europa zon- der socialisme’, zo sprak de partij destijds hoopvol uit.1 Een planhuishouding op Europese schaal in combinatie met een democratisch en politiek verenigd Europa werd noodzakelijk geacht om een dergelijke samenleving te realiseren. Van een ‘rood’ Europa kwam het niet, maar dat neemt niet weg dat binnen de PvdA de hoop daarop lange tijd bleef sluimeren. In de jaren negentig, nadat de partij haar ideologische veren had afgeschud, verdween ook de gedachte van een socialistisch Europa, maar daarmee kwam aan het wensdenken niet 249 PvdA boek 3.indd 249 31-03-16 14:14 Gerrit Voerman geheel een einde: geen socialistisch Europa, maar wellicht toch wel een sociaal Europa, of een welvaartsstaat op Europees niveau.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Pvda Partijbestuur Activiteitenverslag Pvda 2008
    Activiteitenverslag 2008 Amsterdam, 03 juni 2009 Inhoud Hoofdstuk 1. Directie en bestuurssecretariaat 5 1.1 Partijbestuur 5 1.1.1 Algemeen 5 1.2 Bedrijfsherinrichtingsplan 5 1.3 Contacten met neveninstellingen 5 1.4 Bijzondere bijeenkomsten 6 1.4.1 Congres vrijdag en zaterdag 13 en 14 juni 2008 te Breda 6 1.4.2 Politiek Forum vernieuwd naar Politieke Ledenraad 6 1.4.3 Adviesraad Verenigingszaken 6 1.5 Partijcommissies 7 1.5.1 Presidium 7 1.5.2 Adviesteam Kommer en Kwel 7 1.5.3 Beroepscommissie 7 1.5.4 Reglementencommissie 7 1.5.5 Adviescommissie kandidaatstelling 8 1.6 Diverse bijeenkomsten 8 1.6.1 Ledenbijeenkomsten m.b.t. de plannen van het Partijbestuur. 8 1.6.2 1 mei viering 2008 8 1.6.3 Ledenbijeenkomsten Arbeid en Participatie 2 t/m 6 juni 8 1.6.4 Scenariobijeenkomsten Arbeid 7 oktober t/m 28 oktober 8 1.6.5 Economendebat 3 december 2008 8 1.6.6 Den Uyllezing 15 december 2008 9 1.7 Partijgroepen en netwerken 9 1.7.1 Ouderenbeurs 2008 17 september tot en met 21 september. 10 Hoofdstuk 2. Internationaal secretariaat 11 2.1 Algemeen 11 2.2 Socialist International (SI) 11 2.2.1 SI Presidium 11 2.2.2 SI Council 11 2.2.3 SI Congres 11 2.2.4 SI Migration commitee 12 2.2.5 SI Ethics committee 12 2.2.6 Socialist International Women (SIW) 12 2.2.7 Gabriëlle Proft Fund 12 2.3 Partij van Europese Socialisten (PES) 12 2.3.1 PES-Presidium 12 2.3.2 PES-Coördinatie 12 2.3.3 PES Prime ministers en PES leaders meetings 13 2.3.4 PES Development Ministers meetings 13 2.3.5 PES Diversity Netwerk 13 2.3.6 PES Activist forum ‘a strong voice for European
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 GGG Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs PE/V/PV/05-10 MINUTES of the meeting of 7 July 2003, 3 pm - 6.30 pm, and 8 July 2003, 12.30 pm - 6.30 pm BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 15.15 on Monday, 7 July 2003, with Christa Randzio-Plath, chairwoman, in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda PE 323.192 The draft agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Chairman's announcements: The Chair informed the Committee that:- S The vote on ISD will be on 2 September 2003, instead of 8 July, in order to allow time for translation o the compromise amendments. S The coordinators decided that the hearing of Mr Trichet would be on 11 September 2003, and the last hearing with Mr Duisenberg would be on 10 September 2003. 3. Any other business There was no other business. 4. Draft Treaty on the European Consitution and the EP opinion on the convocation of the Intergovernmental Conference IGC * T08391 Draftsperson: Christa RANDZIO-PLATH PV\499334EN.doc PE 333.037 Or. en EN EN Responsible: AFCO R , Opinion: AFET, BUDG, LIBE, JURI, ITRE, AGRI, PECH, CULT, DEVE, PETI, TOUT Speakers: Christa RANDZIO-PLATH, Jean-Louis BOURLANGES. 5. Report on capital adequacy of banks (Basle II) T07642 PE323.182 PE 323.182/AM Rapporteur: Alexander RADWAN -Consideration of amendments -Deadline for tabling amendments 26/06/03 Speakers: Alexander RADWAN * * * Philippe HERZOG took the Chair at 15.40 * * * 6. Investment services and regulated markets (amendment of Directives 85/611/EEC, 93/6/EEC and 2000/12/EC ***T 08115 -(COD020269 - COM (02) 0625 - C5-0586/02) PE323.137 PE323.137/AM1 PE323.137/AM2 PE323.137/AM3 PE323.137/AM4 Rapporteur: Theresa VILLIERS -Consideration of amendments -Deadline for tabling amendments 05/05/03 Opinion: JURI Speakers: Theresa VILLIERS, Alexander RADWAN, Philippe HERZOG, Peter William SKINNER, John PURVIS, Christopher HUHNE, Jean-Louis BOURLANGES, Generoso ANDRIA, Georgios KATIFORIS, Ieke VAN DEN BURG, Mr Delsaux (Commission).
    [Show full text]
  • EUSA Paper Crumhollanderkessel
    Why there is (also) No Domestic Public Opinion on Europe: Three Case-Studies from The Netherlands BEN CRUM, SASKIA HOLLANDER & STIJN VAN KESSEL, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam/ The Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR).∗ Paper to be presented at the EUSA Tenth Biennial International Conference, Montreal, Canada 17 - 19 May 2007. Abstract Much debate about the ‘democratic deficit’ of the European Union focuses on the absence of a European public. As long as such a European public is not present, the brunt of the democratic control of EU decision-making will have to be carried at the national level of the member states where well- established publics can keep their politicians in check. This paper challenges the assumption that, at least, at the national level there are effective publics to control EU decision-making. Our argument takes off from the classical distinction of Herbert Blumer between ‘public opinion’ and (mere) ‘mass opinion’. While a genuine public opinion may be well established on domestic politics, there are structural impediments for it to develop on EU politics. Indeed, for each of the factors that are crucial in structuring public opinion on domestic politics – parliament, parties, interest groups and the media – different research literatures suggest that they experience significant obstacles in performing the same democratic functions when it comes to EU issues. To demonstrate how these factors conspire to frustrate the emergence of public opinion on European integration issues, this paper analyses the handling of three major recent EU dossiers in The Netherlands: the Constitutional Treaty, the opening of accession negotiations with Turkey, and the Services Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • REY Commission (1967-1970)
    COMPOSITION OF THE COMMISSION 1958-2004 HALLSTEIN Commission (1958-1967) REY Commission (1967-1970) MALFATTI – MANSHOLT Commission (1970-1973) ORTOLI Commission (1973-1977) JENKINS Commission (1977-1981) THORN Commission (1981-1985) DELORS Commission (1985) DELORS Commission (1986-1988) DELORS Commission (1989-1995) SANTER Commission (1995-1999) PRODI Commission (1999-2004) HALLSTEIN COMMISSION 1 January 1958 – 30 June 1967 TITLE RESPONSIBLITIES REPLACEMENT (Date appointed) Walter HALLSTEIN President Administration Sicco L. MANSHOLT Vice-President Agriculture Robert MARJOLIN Vice-President Economics and Finance Piero MALVESTITI Vice-President Internal Market Guiseppe CARON (resigned September 1959) (24 November 1959) (resigned 15 May 1963) Guido COLONNA di PALIANO (30 July 1964) Robert LEMAIGNEN Member Overseas Development Henri ROCHEREAU (resigned January 1962) (10 January 1962) Jean REY Member External Relations Hans von der GROEBEN Member Competition Guiseppe PETRILLI Member Social Affairs Lionello LEVI-SANDRI (resigned September 1960) (8 February 1961) named Vice-president (30 July 1064) Michel RASQUIN (died 27 April 1958) Member Transport Lambert SCHAUS (18 June 1958) REY COMMISSION 2 July 1967 – 1 July 1970 TITLE RESPONSIBLITIES REPLACEMENT (Date appointed) Jean REY President Secretariat General Legal Service Spokesman’s Service Sicco L. MANSHOLT Vice-president Agriculture Lionelle LEVI SANDRI Vice-president Social Affairs Personnel/Administration Fritz HELLWIG Vice-president Research and Technology Distribution of Information Joint
    [Show full text]
  • Bundesrat Unterrichtung
    Bundesrat Drucksache 496/08 03.07.08 Unterrichtung durch das Europäische Parlament Erklärung des Europäischen Parlaments zu rheumatischen Erkrankungen Zugeleitet mit Schreiben des Generalsekretärs des Europäischen Parlaments - 310843 - vom 30. Juni 2008. Das Europäische Parlament hat die Entschließung in der Sitzung am 5. Juni 2008 angenommen. Vertrieb: Bundesanzeiger Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Amsterdamer Straße 192, 50735 Köln Telefon: 0221/97668-0, Telefax: 0221/97668-338 ISSN 0720-2946 Drucksache 496/08 - 2 - Erklärung des Europäischen Parlaments zu rheumatischen Erkrankungen Das Europäische Parlament, – gestützt auf Artikel 116 seiner Geschäftsordnung, A. in der Erwägung, dass es sich bei rheumatischen Erkrankungen um chronische Beschwerden handelt, die Schmerzen, Leid und Behinderung verursachen, B. in der Erwägung, dass 30% bis 40% der Bevölkerung Symptome des Bewegungsapparats aufweisen und dass von diesen Symptomen über 100 Millionen Menschen in Europa betroffen sind, C. in der Erwägung, dass rheumatische Erkrankungen die Hauptursache für die Invalidität und Frühberentung von Arbeitnehmern sind, D. in der Erwägung, dass Schätzungen zufolge die über 65 Jahre alten Menschen bis 2030 ein Viertel der europäischen Bevölkerung ausmachen werden und dass die meisten Menschen, die über 70 Jahre alt sind, chronische oder wiederkehrende rheumatische Symptome aufweisen, E. in der Erwägung, dass die Festlegung einer Sozial- und Gesundheitspolitik, die auf einer Analyse der Bedürfnisse der an rheumatischen Erkrankungen leidenden Menschen basiert,
    [Show full text]
  • EUI Working Papers
    ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2010/80 ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES THE RISE OF EUROPEAN COMPETITION POLICY, 1950-1991: A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY SURVEY OF A CONTESTED POLICY SPHERE Laurent Warlouzet EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES The Rise of European Competition Policy, 1950-1991: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of a Contested Policy Sphere LAURENT WARLOUZET EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/80 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper, or other series, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © 2010 Laurent Warlouzet Printed in Italy, October 2010 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), directed by Stefano Bartolini since September 2006, is home to a large post-doctoral programme. Created in 1992, it aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research and to promote work on the major issues facing the process of integration and European society. The Centre hosts major research programmes and projects, and a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration and the expanding membership of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Dimension of EU Competition Policy
    The International Dimension of EU Competition Policy: Does Regional Supranational Regulation Hinder Protectionism? Hikaru YOSHIZAWA Thèse présentée en vue de l'obtention du grade académique de Docteur en Sciences Politiques et sociales sous la codirection de Madame la Professeure Janine GOETSCHY (ULB & CNRS) et Monsieur le Professeur René SCHWOK (UNIGE) Année académique 2015-2016 1 Abstract There is an increasing recognition of the international presence and regulatory influence of the EU in competition policy. Despite a scholarly focus on its international dimension, the issue of nationality-based (non-) discrimination has insufficiently been investigated in the existing literature on EU competition policy. Thus, this research aims to fill this gap in the literature by examining whether the EU internally and externally utilizes its competition rules for the objective of promoting (potential) national and European champions, while disadvantaging non-EU based companies operating inside and outside the European internal market. Empirical findings validate two hypotheses of this research: that the supranational institutional setting of the EU in competition policy constrains the ability of member states to use their competition policies for neomercantilist, and even for protectionist purposes; and that the institutional setup assures nationality-blind enforcement by EU competition regulators, even vis-à-vis non-EU based companies. The research also identifies key systemic factors which either constrain or empower the EU as a regulatory power in the competition policy domain. The empirical analysis draws on both quantitative data and in-depth studies of recent major cases. Most cases are from the period between September 1990 and August 2015, involving American and Japanese companies, which have a strong presence in European economies.
    [Show full text]
  • „Heielei, D'csv Ass Net Méi Derbäi!“
    8 REGARDS woxx | 26 07 2013 | Nr 1225 GESCHICHT POLITIK „Heielei, d’CSV ass net méi derbäi!“ Renée Wagener Ist eine Regierung ohne die Eine Koalition mit der CSV wäre also s’imposer dans leur parti et lui im- sierung und Expansion, sowohl die CSV möglich? Ja, es hat sogar nicht viel stabiler als eine ohne sie. primer ce changement d‘orientation Gewährleistung höchster Entwick- schon einmal eine gegeben. Ein Recht schnell entscheidet sich Pierre qui le déplacera du centre-droit où il lungsmöglichkeiten in pädagogischer, historischer Blick zurück auf die Werner für den Rückzug in die Oppo- se trouve depuis 1945, vers le centre- kultureller und sozialer Hinsicht wie Entstehung der sozialliberalen sition. LSAP und DP scheinen zunächst gauche où il était avant la guerre.“ auch die Eindämmung des Luxus- Koalition in den Siebzigerjahren. verblüfft, doch am 15. Juni 1974 steht Der Einsatz der Wochenzeitung Konsums zum Nutzen der kollektiven die Regierung Thorn-Vouel. „d‘Lëtzebuerger Land“ als Königsma- Investitionsbedürfnisse“. „Le gouvernement se retire.“ Der cher, auf den später des Öfteren hin- Dass die marxistisch angehauchte Ausspruch Pierre Werners, des ehe- „Echter Gleichklang“ gewiesen wird, geschieht demnach Kritik des Aktionsprogramms an der maligen CSV-Premiers, während der nicht im luftleeren Raum. Ende 1972 „neoliberalen Gesellschaftsordnung“ Diskussion um den Militärdienst, die Völlig unverhofft kommt die rot- konstatiert Léon Kinsch, Chefredak- zumindest einem Teil der Liberalen im 1966 zur Staatskrise führte, wird seit blaue Koalition allerdings nicht. Bereits teur des liberalen Blattes, Marcel Marts Folgenden keine Angst einjagt, erklärt einigen Wochen viel zitiert. Genauso Mitte 1972, so der LSAP-Parteihistori- „neoliberaler Progressismus“ besitze sich auch dadurch, dass sich die DP werden die vorgezogenen Neuwahlen ker Ben Fayot, hatte Robert Krieps in „einen echten Gleichklang mit We- selbst unter ihrem „coming man“ Gas- von 1968, bis dato die letzten ihrer Art, Presseartikeln die Möglichkeit einer henkels reformistischer Reflexion“.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaarverslag 2014
    Jaarverslag 2014 1 Inhoudsopgave De opdracht van de Wiardi Beckman Stichting 4 Onafhankelijkheid 5 Open relatie met de omgeving 5 Functies WBS 5 1. Zelfstandige analyse, agendering en programmatisch werk 6 1.1 Meerjarenprogramma Van Waarde 6 Van Waarde Lokaal 6 Van Waarde Duurzaam 7 Bestaanszekerheid en goed werk: onderzoek naar schijnconstructies 7 Binding: de bevordering van sociale en culturele integratie 7 1.2 WBS Jaarboek - Omstreden vrijheid 8 1.3 S&D 9 S&D om tafel 10 Samenwerking S&D en De Helling: Toekomst voor Links 11 2. Forum- en netwerkfunctie 12 2.1 Internationale Internationale bijeenkomsten 12 Progressive Governance Conference Amsterdam 24-25 april 2014 12 De toekomst van het Scandinavisch model 13 The Good Society-Conferentie in Berlijn 13 Democratie-problemen in Oost- en West Europa 13 Budapest conference on the future of the European left 14 2.2 Werkgroepen 15 Werkgroep partijpolitieke processen 15 Werkgroep jonge economen 15 Werkgroep duurzame ontwikkeling 15 Werkgroep Eigentijdse Sociaal Democratie 15 Werkgroep Farmacie 16 Werkgroep geschiedenis 16 Werkgroep arbeid 16 Werkgroep duurzame ontwikkeling 16 2.3 Jong WBS 17 2.4 WBS Europafonds 2014 19 Projecten 19 Financiële ondersteuning 20 2.5 Ad-hoc denktanks en debatten 21 Studenten-denktank ‘Diplomatiedemocratie’ 21 Wat te doen met antidemocratische partijen? 21 3. PvdA 22 3.1 Partijbestuur, commissies en verenigingswerk 22 3.2 Strategische werkconferenties 22 2 3.3 Goed werk 22 4. Curatorium, staf en fellows 23 4.1 Curatorium 23 4.2 Staf 23 4.3 Stagiaires 23 4.4 Fellows 24 5. Publicaties 25-33 3 De opdracht van de Wiardi Beckman Stichting De WBS stelt zich ten doel om urgente maatschappelijke vraagstukken te signaleren, deze wetenschappelijk te analyseren vanuit een lange-termijn perspectief en sociaaldemocratisch gezindheid, en er toekomstgericht over te adviseren.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 G G G Session document FINAL A5-0133/2003 28 April 2003 REPORT on the Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development (COM(2002) 347 - 2002/2261(INI)) Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Rapporteur: Philip Bushill-Matthews RR\316408EN.doc PE 316.408 EN EN PE 316.408 2/27 RR\316408EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 12 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY ........................................................................................................................ 13 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION.............. 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES................................................................................................................... 25 RR\316408EN.doc 3/27 PE 316.408 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 2 July 2002 the Commission forwarded to Parliament
    [Show full text]