DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliographie Phénoménologie Et Neurosciences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliographie Phénoménologie Et Neurosciences 1 Séminaire de philosophie générale. Automne 2008. Neurosciences et phénoménologie. Bibliographie sélective. Professeur : Raphaël Célis. A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, édité par Samuel Guttenplan, Oxford, Blackwell,1995. Henri Atlan, Projet et signification dans des réseaux d’automates, Le rôle de la sophistication, in Dominique Janicaud (éd.), L’intentionnalité en question entre phénoménologie et recherches cognitives, 1995, p. 261-287. Bernard. J. Baars, A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness, Cambridge University Press, 1998. Benoist Jocelyn, L’Idée de phénoménologie, Paris, Beauchesne, 2001. Michel Bitbol, Remarques sur la physique et la naturalisation de la phénoménologie, IHPST / CNRS, Paris, 2001. Ned Block, Owen Flanagan et Güven Güzeldere (éd), The nature of consciousness, A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 1997. Tyler Burge , Two types of consciousness, in The nature of consciousness, A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 1997.David Chalmers, The Conscious Mind, In Search of a Fundamental Theory, Oxford University Press, 1996. Jean-Pierre Changeux , L’homme de vérité, Paris,Odile Jacob , 2002. Axel Cleeremans , Implicit Learning and Consciousness: An Empirical, Philosophical and Computational Consensus in the Making (Frontiers of Cognitive Science), Taylor & Francis, New- York, 2002. Axel Cleeremans, Ces zombies qui nous gouvernent, La Recherche, n° 366, juillet-août, 2003. Richard Cobb-Stevens, Husserl et la philosophie analytique, Paris,Vrin, 1998. Antonio R. Damasio , Spinoza avait raison, joie et tristesse, le cerveau des émotions, Paris, Odile Jacob, 2003. Antonio R. Damasio, Descartes' Error, 10th Anniversary edition, with a new author preface, Penguin Books, New York, 2005. Traduction : L'Erreur de Descartes. La raison des émotions, Odile Jacob, Paris, 1995. Antonio R. Damasio, The Feeling of What Happens. Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness, Penguin Books, New York, 1999. Donald Davidson , Essays on actions and events, Oxford University Press, 1980. Daniel Dennett , Consciousness Explained, Penguin Books, 1991. Daniel Dennett , Darwin ‘s Dangerous Idea, Evolution and the Meanings of Life, Penguin Books, 1995. Daniel Dennett , Kinds of Minds, Towards an Understanding of Consciousness, Weindenfeld & Nicholson, London, 1996. Traduction française par Alexandre Abensour, La diversité des esprits, Une approche de la conscience, Hachette, 1998. Daniel Dennett, Brainchildren, Essays on Designing Minds, Penguin Books, 1998. Daniel Dennett , Cognitive Wheels, in Brainchildren, Penguin Books, 1998 Daniel Dennett, Are we Explaining Consciousness Yet? , Cognition, 2000, final draft. Daniel Dennett, How could I be wrong? How wrong could I be? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2002. Daniel Dennett , Freedom Evolves, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, 2003. Natalie Depraz, La conscience, approches croisées des classiques aux sciences cognitives, Armand Colin, Collection Cursus Lettres, Paris, 2001. 2 Hubert L. Dreyfus et al. (éd) Husserl , Intentionality and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, M.I.T. Press, 1982. Hubert L. Dreyfus , The Primacy of Phenomenology over Logical Analysis, tiré-à-part disponible sur demande. Michael Dummett, Les origines de la philosophie analytique, nrf essais, Gallimard, 1991. Gerald Edelman, Biologie de la conscience, Odile Jacob 1992. Pascal Engel, Philosophie et psychologie, Paris, Gallimard, folio essais, 1996. Jacques English , Le vocabulaire de Husserl, Ellipses, 2002. Michael Andreas Esfeld, La philosophie de l’esprit. De la relation entre l’esprit et la nature. Paris, Armand Colin, 2005 Michael Adreas Esfeld, Mental causation and the metaphysics of causation, Erkenntnis 67 (2007), pp. 207-220 Michael Adreas Esfeld, Mental causation and mental properties, Dialectica 59 (2005), pp. 5-18. Denis Fisette et Pierre Poirier, Philosophie de l’esprit, Psychologie du sens commun et sciences de l’esprit, Paris, Vrin, 2001. Denis Fisette et Pierre Poirier, Philosophie de l’esprit, Problèmes et perspectives, Paris, Vrin, 2004.Owen Flanagan, Consciousness Reconsidered, MIT Press, Cambridge,1992. Owen Flanagan, The Robust Phenomenology of the Stream of consciousness, in The nature of Consciousness, 1997. Jerry A. Fodor , Concepts, Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong, Clarendon Press Oxford, 1998. Jerry A. Fodor , Ernie Lepore , What is The Connection Principle?, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, December 1994, volume LIV n° 4. Jerry A. Fodor , Too hard for our kind of mind?, London Review of Books, 13.12, 1991. Jerry A. Fodor, The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way, The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology, A Bradford book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 2001. Robert. M. French & Axel Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, computational and philosophical consensus in the making. Hove, UK Psychology Press, 2001. Shaun Gallagher, Mutual Enlightenment: Recent Phenomenology in Cognitive Science, in Journal of Consciousness Studies 4, No. 3, 1997. Howard Gardner , Mind and Brain: Only the Right Connections, in Review of What makes us think?, Princeton University Press, 2000. Michael Gazzaniga, Ivry, Mangun, Les neurosciences cognitives, De Boeck Université, Bruxelles, 2001. Steven W. Horst, Beyond reduction : philosophy of mind and post-reductionist philosophy of science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2007. Edmund Husserl , Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie I, 1913, traduction de Paul Ricoeur, Tel, Gallimard, 1950. Edmund Husserl, Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie et une philosophie phénoménologique pures II, Recherches phénoménologiques pour la constitution, trad. E. Escoubas , Paris, P.U.F., 1982. Edmund Husserl , Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie et une philosophie phénoménologique pures III: La phénoménologie et les fondements des sciences, traduction D. Tiffeneau, Paris, P.U.F. 1993. Edmund Husserl, Psychologie phénoménologique 1925-1928, traduction de Philippe Cabestan, Natalie Depraz et Antonino Mazzù, Paris,Vrin, 2001. Pierre Jacob, L’Intentionnalité. Problèmes de philosophie de l’esprit, Paris, Odile Jacob, 3 2004.Dominique Janicaud (éd.), L’intentionnalité en question entre phénoménologie et recherches cognitives, Paris, Vrin, 1995. Antoine Lutz (éd.), Naturalizing Phenomenology, numéro spécial de la revue Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, III/4, décembre 2004. Ronald McIntyre , L’épiphénoménologie de Husserl in Phénoménologie et psychologie cognitive, Etudes philosophiques, janvier-mars 1991. Steven Pinker, Comment fonctionne l’esprit, Odile Jacob, 2000. Traduction française de How the Mind Works, 1997. Hilary Putnam , Représentation et Réalité, 1988, trad. fr. Gallimard, NRF essais, 1990.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983. Marina Rakova, Philosophy of mind A-Z, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2006.John R. Searle , Intentionalistic Explanations, 1991, in Consciousness and Language. John R. Searle , The Connection Principle and the Ontology of the Unconscious: A Reply to Fodor and Lepore, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, December 1994, p. 849-851. John R. Searle , The Explanation of Cognition, 1997, in Consciousness and Language, 2002. John R. Searle , Consciousness, 2000, in Consciousness and Language, 2002. John R. Searle , How to Study Consciousness Scientifically, 1998, in Consciousness and Language, 2002. John R. Searle , The Construction of Social Reality, Allen Lane The Penguin Press, 1995. Traduction française : La construction de la réalité sociale , Paris, Gallimard, 1997. John R. Searle, The Mystery of Consciousness, Granta Books 1997. Traduction française: Le mystère de conscience, trad. par Claudine Tiercelin, éditions Odile Jacob, Paris, 1999. John R. Searle, Mind, Language and Society, Doing Philosophy in the Real World, Weidenfeld & Nocolson, London, 1999. John R. Searle , Limits of Phenomenology, Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science. Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Volume Two, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2000 John R. Searle , Le temps, in Quelle philosophie pour le XXIe siècle ?, Gallimard, folio essais, 2001. John R. Searle , Neither Phenomenological Description nor Rational Reconstruction, in Searle with his replies, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, juin 2001. John R. Searle, Rationality in Action, A Bradford book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2001. John R. Searle , Consciousness and Language, Cambridge University press, 2002. Elisabeth Pacherie, Naturaliser l’intentionnalité. Essai de philosophie de la psychologie, Paris, PUF,1993. Jean Petitot, Francisco J. Varela, Bernard Pachoud, Jean-Michel Roy (éds.), Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, Stanford University Press, 1999. Traduction française : Naturaliser la phénoménologie. Essais sur la phénoménologie contemporaine et les sciences cognitives, Paris, CNRS éditions, 2002. Morten Overgaard, On the naturalising of phenomenology, in Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Volume 3, Number 4, 2004. Francisco Varela , L’inscription corporelle de l’esprit, Seuil, 1993. Francesco Varela , The Specious Present. A Neurophenomenology of Time Consciousness, in Naturalizing Phenomenology, 1999. Francisco Varela, Neurophenomenology. A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem, in Special Issues on the Hard Problems, J.Shear (Ed.) Journal of Consciousness Studies, Juin 1996. Wioletta Miskievicz, Husserl
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow*
    1 Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow* Raphaël Millière École normale supérieure, Paris – October 2011 Translated by Mark Ohm with the assistance of Leah Orth, Jon Cogburn, and Emily Beck Cogburn “By metaphysics, I do not mean those abstract considerations of certain imaginary properties, the principal use of which is to furnish the wherewithal for endless dispute to those who want to dispute. By this science I mean the general truths which can serve as principles for the particular sciences.” Malebranche Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion 1. The interminable agony of metaphysics Throughout the twentieth century, numerous philosophers sounded the death knell of metaphysics. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Rudolf Carnap, Martin Heidegger, Gilbert Ryle, J. L. Austin, Jacques Derrida, Jürgen Habermas, Richard Rorty, and, henceforth, Hilary Putnam: a great many tutelary figures have extolled the rejection, the exceeding, the elimination, or the deconstruction of first philosophy. All these necrological chronicles do not have the same radiance, the same seriousness, nor the same motivations, but they all agree to dismiss the discipline, which in the past was considered “the queen of the sciences”, with a violence at times comparable to the prestige it commanded at the time of its impunity. Even today, certain philosophers hastily spread the tragic news with contempt for philosophical inquiry, as if its grave solemnity bestowed upon it some obviousness. Thus, Franco Volpi writes: ‘Grand metaphysics is dead!’ is the slogan which applies to the majority of contemporary philosophers, whether continentals or of analytic profession. They all treat metaphysics as a dead dog.1 In this way, the “path of modern thought” would declare itself vociferously “anti- metaphysical and finally post-metaphysical”.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 2013 Business Meeting
    Minutes of the Business Meeting Charles Sanders Peirce Society 21 February 2013 Following the annual scholarly meeting, with papers by President Claudine Tiercelin ( “The Relevance of Peirce’s Scientific Metaphysics”) and Essay Contest winner Masato Ishida ( “Revisiting Convergence: A Peircean Reply to Quine’s Two Problems”), President Tiercelin called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm at the New Orleans Hilton Riverside. 1. Claudine Tiercelin asked for approval of the minutes of the 2010-11 business meeting. The minutes were approved. (Moved by Robert Lane, seconded by Cornelis de Waal.) 2. Claudine Tiercelin delivered the following report from the President and the Executive Committee: The committee met from 10:00am until about 11:30 am on the morning of Thursday February 21. Presentweree Robert Lane, Cornelis de Waal, Richard Atkins, Claudine Tiercelin (President), James Liszka (Vice-President), Shannon Dea (Secretary-Treasurer). We received regrets from Daniel Campos and Giovanni Maddalena, who were unable to attend. Chief among the issues discussed by the Executive Committee were the following. a) Bob Lane raised an issue brought to his attention by an electronic subscriber. It turns out that JSTOR only allows electronic subscribers access to 75 back issue articles per year. More seriously, these articles must be viewed as html files; they cannot be downloaded as pdfs. This is highly inconvenient, and may serve as a disincentive to our electronic subscribers. At a minimum, this limitation on electronic subscriptions should be made clear to people at the time they subscribe. Ideally, though, we would persuade IU Press/JSTOR to change this practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Benoit Gaultier (40 y/o) ⚫ Postdoctoral Research Fellow (Fonds zur Förderung des akademischen Nachwuchses), University of Zurich ⚫ Director of the Epistemology Research Group (GRÉ) of the Collège de France Email addresses: [email protected] [email protected] Phone: +33 645 80 10 42 Areas of speciality Epistemology ⚫ Pragmatism Areas of competence Philosophy of action ⚫ Metaphysics ⚫ Philosophy of mind ⚫ Current positions 2020-2024 Co-Director of the SNF-research project Suspension of judgement. Its nature and its norms, University of Zurich 2019-2021 Postdoc-Forschung of the Fonds zur Förderung des akademischen Nachwuchses, University of Zurich 2015– Director of the Epistemology Research Group (GRÉ) of the Chair in Metaphysics and Philosophy of Knowledge, Collège de France, Paris Previous positions 2018-2019 Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Zurich 2016–2020 Chargé de cours (Lecturer), University of Aix-Marseille, France 2013-2015 Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Helsinki (DiaMind project) 2011–2013 ATER (Lecturer), Chair in Metaphysics and Philosophy of Knowledge, Collège de France, Paris 2011–2013 Postdoc affiliate, Jean Nicod Institute, Paris Education 2020-2022 Habilitation à diriger des recherches 2014; 2018-… Qualification à la fonction de maître de conférences en philosophie 2004–2011 PhD in Philosophy (graduated with highest honors), Jean Nicod Institute & Univ. Paris-Est: Théorie et pratique dans la tradition pragmatiste. Supervisor: Claudine Tiercelin. 2003 Master of Research (with Class I Honours) in Philosophy, Univ. Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne 2001–2002 Agrégation de philosophie: bi-admissibilité Scholarships 2003 Bourse de Master (Graduate Scholarship), Univ. Paris I Panthéon- Sorbonne 2002 Bourse d’agrégation, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAIRE Du COLLÈGE DE FRANCE Du COLLÈGE DE FRANCE 2016 - 2017 2016 - 2017
    117e année ANNUAIRE ANNUAIRE du COLLÈGE DE FRANCE du COLLÈGE DE FRANCE 2016 - 2017 2016 - 2017 Résumé des cours et travaux Résumé des cours et travaux e La 117e édition de l’Annuaire du Collège de France reflète l’activité 117 scientifique de l’institution pour l’année académique 2016-2017. Elle année contient notamment les résumés détaillés des enseignements ainsi qu’une présentation des recherches menées par les professeurs du Collège de France, leurs laboratoires et équipes de recherche. Avec les contributions de : Philippe AGHION, Édouard BARD, Gérard BERRY, Jean-Daniel BOISSONNAT, Patrick BOUCHERON, Jean-Pierre BRUN, Dominique CHARPIN, Anne CHENG, Jean-Louis COHEN, Françoise COMBES, Antoine COMPAGNON, Alain CONNES, Jean DALIBARD, Stanislas DEHAENE, François DEROCHE, Bernard DERRIDA, Philippe DESCOLA, Alain FISCHER, Marc FONTECAVE, Jean-Luc FOURNET, Antoine GEORGES, Frantz GRENET, Nicolas GRIMAL, Edith HEARD, Jean-Jacques HUBLIN, Henry LAURENS, Thomas LECUIT, Alain DE LIBERA, Pierre-Louis LIONS, Philippe MANOURY, Pierre-Michel MENGER, Carlo OSSOLA, Christine PETIT, Alain PROCHIANTZ, Jean-Noël ROBERT, Barbara ROMANOWICZ, Thomas RÖMER, Didier ROUX, Pierre ROSANVALLON, Clément SANCHEZ, Philippe SANSONETTI, Bénédicte SAVOY, Sanjay SUBRAHMANYAM, Alain SUPIOT, Jean-Marie TARASCON, Hugues DE THE, Claudine TIERCELIN, Claire VOISIN, Alain WIJFFELS ANNUAIRE DU COLLÈGE DE FRANCE 2016-2017 ANNUAIRE L’édition électronique de cet ouvrage est disponible sur https://journals.openedition.org/annuaire-cdf ISSN 0069-5580 ISBN 978-2-7226-0489-6 25 €
    [Show full text]
  • Vagueness and the Ontology of Art a Vagueza E a Ontologia Da Arte
    Vagueness and the Ontology of Art A Vagueza e a Ontologia da Arte Claudine Tiercelin University of Paris XII – Institut Jean Nicod - France [email protected] Abstract: Vagueness and the ontology of art are both thorny issues. Although a lot of original work has been conducted in the XXth century in the domain of the ontology of art, trying to clarify, the nature of a work of art, its conditions of identity and individuation, and the status of aesthetic properties, there has also been some suspicion about the relevance of such ontological reflexions which seem to take us too far away from aesthetic experiences, artistic practices and the works themselves. As far as vagueness is concerned, it is often viewed as a mere epistemic or semantic notion, and the claim that there might be vague objects, namely ontic vagueness, is very seldom taken as a serious option1 . However, if the apparent lack of boundaries, whatever its sources, is characteristic of vagueness, art would seem to be, prima facie, one of the domains that might be most hospitable to it. But if there are strong reasons against making sense of ontic vagueness, our prima facie intuitions may be just as hard to sustain here as anywhere else. Is there a way to avoid such conclusions? To view vagueness not only as an objective property but even as an irreducible constituent of reality, and as such, of the ontology of art itself? Following some original insights offered by Ch.S. Peirce, at the turn of the century, on the semiotic, epistemology and ontology of vagueness, I shall suggest that there is such a way, and that it may even help to favor some form of realism of vagueness in art.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Charles S. Peirce International Centennial Congress Peirce 2014: Invigorating Philosophy for the 21St Century
    The Charles S. Peirce Society and the Charles S. Peirce Foundation present The 2014 Charles S. Peirce International Centennial Congress Peirce 2014: Invigorating Philosophy for the 21st Century Expanded Program (with Abstracts) Last Updated Wednesday 16 July, 1 p.m. University of Massachusetts Lowell July 16-19 In Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the death of Charles S. Peirce Peirce Centennial Congress (July 2014) Updated 7/16, 1 p.m.: 2 Note to the Reader The primary purpose of this expanded program is to provide Congress attendees with abstracts of the papers to be presented; we also list errata in the printed (hard copy) program that came to light since that document went to press. Every effort has been made to ensure consistency of this expanded program with the printed program. In the event (unlikely, we hope!) that the two programs contradict one another, the printed program should be taken as authoritative, except for the errata noted below. We hope that this expanded program will help you to make the most of your time at the Peirce Centennial Congress. Should further updates be necessary, a modified version of this document will be posted on the Congress website, with an indication of the most recent revision date on the title page, and in the running head. Rosa Mayorga & Matthew Moore Co-Chairs, Program Committee Contents Errata in Printed (Hard Copy) Program: 3 Conference Schedule: 4 Concurrent Sessions A (Wed. 1 p.m.-2:30 p.m.): 8 Concurrent Sessions B (Wed. 2:45 p.m.-4:15 p.m.): 11 Concurrent Sessions C (Thu.
    [Show full text]
  • European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy
    European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy XI-1 | 2019 European Pragmatism Pragmatism and the Birth of Subjective Probability Maria Carla Galavotti Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/1509 DOI: 10.4000/ejpap.1509 ISSN: 2036-4091 Publisher Associazione Pragma Electronic reference Maria Carla Galavotti, « Pragmatism and the Birth of Subjective Probability », European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy [Online], XI-1 | 2019, Online since 19 July 2019, connection on 21 July 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/1509 ; DOI : 10.4000/ejpap.1509 This text was automatically generated on 21 July 2019. Author retains copyright and grants the European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Pragmatism and the Birth of Subjective Probability 1 Pragmatism and the Birth of Subjective Probability Maria Carla Galavotti 1. Pragmatism and the Foundations of Probability 1 The debate on the foundations of probability in the first half of the twentieth century is imbued with ideas that are distinctive of pragmatism. In earlier work, I have emphasized that a number of protagonists of that debate, regardless of the attitude taken in connection with the interpretation of probability, were strongly influenced by pragmatist philosophers. For example, Rudolf Carnap acknowledged his debt towards Clarence Irving Lewis, as did Hans Reichenbach
    [Show full text]
  • Hilary Putnam on Meaning and Necessity Anders Öberg
    Hilary Putnam on Meaning and Necessity Anders Öberg Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Geijersalen, Human- istiskt Centrum, Engelska parken, Uppsala. Saturday, December 3, 2011 at 13:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Öberg, A. 2011. Hilary Putnam on Meaning and Necessity. Department of Philosophy. 166 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-506-2243-0. In this dissertation on Hilary Putnam's philosophy, I investigate his development regarding meaning and necessity, in particular mathematical necessity. Putnam has been a leading American philosopher since the end of the 1950s, becoming famous in the 1960s within the school of analytic philosophy, associated in particular with the philosophy of science and the philosophy of language. Under the influence of W.V. Quine, Putnam challenged the logical positivism/empiricism that had become strong in America after World War II, with influential exponents such as Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach. Putnam agreed with Quine that there are no absolute a priori truths. In particular, he was critical of the notion of truth by convention. Instead he developed a notion of relative a priori truth, that is, a notion of neces- sary truth with respect to a body of knowledge, or a conceptual scheme. Putnam's position on necessity has developed over the years and has always been connected to his important con- tributions to the philosophy of meaning. I study Hilary Putnam's development through an early phase of scientific realism, a middle phase of internal realism, and his later position of a natural or commonsense realism.
    [Show full text]
  • Claudine Tiercelin, Professeur
    Métaphysique et philosophie de la connaissance Mme Claudine TIERCELIN, professeur COURS : LA CONNAISSANCE PRATIQUE a Le cours de l’année 2014-2015 a porté sur la connaissance pratique, cette modalité de la connaissance que nous avons spontanément tendance à distinguer de (voire, à opposer à) la connaissance théorique, et qui, pense-t-on, recourt à des formes d’intelligence ou à des capacités cognitives différentes. Pour lire un livre, il faut connaître l’alphabet, le sens des phrases, savoir analyser, faire preuve de réflexion, marque de notre raison et de la puissance de notre intellect. Pour nager ou lacer nos souliers, pour être guidés dans nos actions, nous avons surtout besoin de sens pratique, de « jugeotte », ou de « gingin », d’un « esprit manuel », forme de l’intelligence souvent dévalorisée et à laquelle on réserve, du reste, tâches et professions subalternes. Il s’agissait donc de se demander si nous avions raison de distinguer, d’opposer ces deux modalités de la connaissance, voire de réduire l’une à l’autre. Faut-il considérer que ce sont des capacités cognitives différentes qui président, dans un cas, à notre action et, dans l’autre, à notre réflexion ? Que la connaissance pratique obéit à des règles qui ne sont pas du même ordre que celles qui régissent la connaissance théorique ? Que le savoir faire – savoir comment (knowing how) – n’est pas du même type que le savoir propositionnel (savoir que, knowing that), bref, que nous ne savons pas au même titre quand nous savons comment mettre une chaîne sur un pneu et qu’il y a aujourd’hui, de forts risques d’avalanche ? Le premier cours a introduit à ces questions en rappelant les origines et les ressorts de l’anti-intellectualisme présent dès l’Antiquité (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Claudine Tiercelin : « Du Vague Des Objets À L'objectivité
    Klēsis – 2020 : 45 – La philosophie de Pascal Engel DU VAGUE DES OBJETS À L’OBJECTIVITÉ DU VAGUE, ET RETOUR Claudine Tiercelin (Collège de France) Il y a trente ans, Pascal Engel consacrait un chapitre important de son livre La Norme du vrai à la question du vague (1989, chap. X : 255-275). Il y revenait ensuite, à plusieurs reprises, dans différents articles (1988, 1989, 1991a, 1992, 2003), introduisant, analy- sant et discutant pied à pied, les thèses qui occupaient alors le devant de la scène, et no- tamment, celles de Frege, de Michael Dummett, de Crispin Wright, de Michael Tye, ou en- core de Mark Sainsbury, auteurs qu’il contribua largement à faire connaître en France, à l’occasion d’amicales rencontres ou de multiples ateliers et colloques qu’il organisa, à Paris, à Grenoble, puis à Caen, dans un acharnement jamais démenti à multiplier et à faire aimer les échanges entre les philosophes français et, principalement alors, les phi- losophes britanniques. À peu près à la même époque, il soulignait aussi - et fut, une fois encore, le premier à le faire - la proximité des thèses défendues par des auteurs comme Peirce et Frank Ramsey (dont peu se penchaient alors sur le « pragmatisme »), à propos de questions aussi cruciales que les croyances, les dispositions et la vérité (Engel 1983). Une fois n’est pas coutume, et l’on me pardonnera ces remarques un peu personnelles, mais je voudrais dire ici que l’on ne passe pas plus de quarante ans de sa vie auprès d’un être aussi exceptionnel que le philosophe Engel sans que ses intérêts, sa curiosité, ses ar- guments n’imprègnent très fortement votre propre pensée.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAIRE Du COLLÈGE DE FRANCE Du COLLÈGE DE FRANCE 2017 - 2018 2017 - 2018
    118e année ANNUAIRE ANNUAIRE du COLLÈGE DE FRANCE du COLLÈGE DE FRANCE 2017 - 2018 2017 - 2018 Résumé des cours et travaux Résumé des cours et travaux e La 118e édition de l’Annuaire du Collège de France reflète l’activité 118 scientifique de l’institution pour l’année académique 2017-2018. Elle année contient notamment les résumés détaillés des enseignements ainsi qu’une présentation des recherches menées par les professeurs du Collège de France, leurs laboratoires et équipes de recherche. Avec les contributions de : Philippe AGHION, Édouard BARD, Gérard BERRY, Patrick BOUCHERON, Jean-Pierre BRUN, Dominique CHARPIN, Anne CHENG, Jean-Louis COHEN, Françoise COMBES, Antoine COMPAGNON, Jean DALIBARD, Stanislas DEHAENE, François DÉROCHE, Bernard DERRIDA, Philippe DESCOLA, Denis DUBOULE, Thomas EBBESEN, Edhem ELDEM, Alain FISCHER, Marc FONTECAVE, Jean-Luc FOURNET, Antoine GEORGES, Frantz GRENET, Nicolas GRIMAL, Edith HEARD, François HÉRAN, Jean-Jacques HUBLIN, Henry LAURENS, Thomas LECUIT, Alain DE LIBERA, Pierre-Louis LIONS, Stéphane MALLAT, Claire MATHIEU, Pierre- Michel MENGER, Carlo OSSOLA, Christine PETIT, Vinciane PIRENNE-DELFORGE, Alain PROCHIANTZ, Jean-Noël ROBERT, Barbara ROMANOWICZ, Thomas RÖMER, Pierre ROSANVALLON, Clément SANCHEZ, Philippe SANSONETTI, Bénédicte SAVOY, Victor STOICHITA, Sanjay SUBRAHMANYAM, Alain SUPIOT, Jean-Marie TARASCON, Hugues DE THÉ, Claudine TIERCELIN, Claire VOISIN. ANNUAIRE DU COLLÈGE DE FRANCE 2017-2018 ANNUAIRE L’édition électronique de cet ouvrage est disponible sur https://journals.openedition.org/annuaire-cdf ISSN 0069-5580 ISBN 978-2-7226-0516-9 25 € MÉTAPHYSIQUE ET PHILOSOPHIE DE LA CONNAISSANCE Claudine TIERCELIN Professeur au Collège de France, membre de l’Institut (Académie des sciences morales et politiques) Mots-clés : épistémologie, essentialisme, vérité, démocratie Le colloque « Les principes de l’épistémologie » est disponible en audio et vidéo sur le site internet du Collège de France : https://www.college-de-france.fr/site/claudine- tiercelin/symposium-2017-2018.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Homage to Christopherh
    Homage to Christopher Hookway Universitat de Valencia 25th November 2011 The Key Role of C. Hookway in the Contemporary Reception of C. S. Peirce in Europe Jaime Nubiola [email protected] [Draft Oral Text] I am very grateful to Carlos Moya and Tobies Grimaltes for having invited me to take part in this homage to my admired friend Christopher Hookway. I have learnt a lot from Chris during many years and it is a pleasure and an honor to be here to testify to my debt and to try to express my gratitude. As Emily Dickinson said to her mentor, "Gratitude is the only secret that cannot reveal itself."1 My presentation today will begin, first, with a remembrance of my personal relationship with professor Hookway. Secondly, following in the footsteps of Chris, I will make a plea for a recovery of Peirce in analytic philosophy, and thirdly, I will try to make a contrast between Hookway and Rorty in relation to Peirce in order to highlight the key role that Chris has had in Europe in the present recovery of the figure and thought of Charles S. Peirce. My claim is that Hookway's presentation of Peirce as an analytic philosopher avant la lettre has been extremely influential in Europe for the recovery of Peirce, comparable to the influence that Rorty has had for the general resurgence of pragmatism. 1. A Personal Remembrance of Chris Hookway The first time I met Chris was in Oxford in April 1992, almost twenty years ago. I was attending an interesting conference in Christ Church on computers and humanities.
    [Show full text]