NEWSLETTER NUMBER 129 September 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dendrobium Kingianum Bidwill Ex Lindl
Volume 24: 203–232 ELOPEA Publication date: 19 May 2021 T dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea14806 Journal of Plant Systematics plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL • ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) A review of Dendrobium kingianum Bidwill ex Lindl. (Orchidaceae) with morphological and molecular- phylogenetic analyses Peter B. Adams1,2, Sheryl D. Lawson2, and Matthew A.M. Renner 3 1The University of Melbourne, School of BioSciences, Parkville 3010, Victoria 2National Herbarium of Victoria, Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Ave., Melbourne 3004, Victoria 3National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney 2000, New South Wales Author for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Populations of Dendrobium kingianum Bidwill ex Lindl. from near Newcastle, New South Wales to southern and central west Queensland and encompassing all regions of the distribution were studied using field observations, morphometric analysis and nrITS sequences. A total of 281 individuals were used to construct regional descriptions of D. kingianum and 139 individuals were measured for 19 morphological characters, and similarities and differences among specimens summarised using multivariate statistical methods. Patterns of morphological variation within D. kingianum are consistent with a single variable species that expresses clinal variation, with short-growing plants in the south and taller plants in the northern part of the distribution. The nrITS gene tree suggests two subgroups within D. kingianum subsp. kingianum, one comprising northern, the other southern individuals, which may overlap in the vicinity of Dorrigo, New South Wales. The disjunct D. kingianum subsp. carnarvonense Peter B. -
Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification
--------- -- ---------· 4 CHAPTER 1 REVIEW OF SELECTED LITERATURE AND EPIPHYTE CLASSIFICATION 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Literature (p. 5) Several important aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology that are not investigated as part of this work, are reviewed, particularly those published on more. recently. 1.2 Epiphyte Classification and Terminology (p.11) is reviewed and the system used here is outlined and defined. A glossary of terms, as used here, is given. 5 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Li.terature Since the main works of Schimper were published (1884, 1888, 1898), particularly Die Epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas (1888), many workers have written on many aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology. Most of these will not be reviewed here because they are not directly relevant to the present study or have been effectively reviewed by others. A few papers that are keys to the earlier literature will be mentioned but most of the review will deal with topics that have not been reviewed separately within the chapters of this project where relevant (i.e. epiphyte classification and terminology, aspects of epiphyte synecology and CAM in the epiphyt~s). Reviewed here are some special problems of epiphytes, particularly water and mineral availability, uptake and cycling, general nutritional strategies and matters related to these. Also, all Australian works of any substance on vascular epiphytes are briefly discussed. some key earlier papers include that of Pessin (1925), an autecology of an epiphytic fern, which investigated a number of factors specifically related to epiphytism; he also reviewed more than 20 papers written from the early 1880 1 s onwards. -
Comparative Seed Morphology of Tropical and Temperate Orchid Species with Different Growth Habits
plants Article Comparative Seed Morphology of Tropical and Temperate Orchid Species with Different Growth Habits Surya Diantina 1,2,*, Craig McGill 1, James Millner 1, Jayanthi Nadarajan 3 , Hugh W. Pritchard 4 and Andrea Clavijo McCormick 1 1 School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Tennent Drive, 4410 Palmerston North, New Zealand; [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (A.C.M.) 2 Indonesia Agency for Agricultural Research and Development (IAARD), Jl. Ragunan 29, Pasar Minggu, Jakarta Selatan 12540, Indonesia 3 The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Batchelar Road, Fitzherbert, 4474 Palmerston North, New Zealand; [email protected] 4 Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wellcome Trust Millennium Building, Wakehurst, Ardingly, West Sussex RH17 6TN, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 5 December 2019; Accepted: 17 January 2020; Published: 29 January 2020 Abstract: Seed morphology underpins many critical biological and ecological processes, such as seed dormancy and germination, dispersal, and persistence. It is also a valuable taxonomic trait that can provide information about plant evolution and adaptations to different ecological niches. This study characterised and compared various seed morphological traits, i.e., seed and pod shape, seed colour and size, embryo size, and air volume for six orchid species; and explored whether taxonomy, biogeographical origin, or growth habit are important determinants of seed morphology. We investigated this on two tropical epiphytic orchid species from Indonesia (Dendrobium strebloceras and D. -
1992 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Dr Eric Godley Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright
NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 30 DECEMBER 1992 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Dr Eric Godley Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright Committee: Sarah Beadel, Ewen Cameron, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: New Zealand Botanical Society C/- Auckland Institute & Museum Private Bag 92018 AUCKLAND Subscriptions The 1993 ordinary and institutional subs are $14 (reduced to $10 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 1993 student sub, available to full-time students, is $7 (reduced to $5 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each - from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 30 (December 1992). Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February of each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next year's subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the March 1993 issue (Number 31) is 26 February 1993. Please forward contributions to: Bruce & Beverley Clarkson, Editors NZ Botanical Society Newsletter 7 Lynwood Place HAMILTON Cover illustration Asplenium pauperequitum (Aspleniaceae). Drawn by Lesley Alexander from specimens and photographs taken on the Poor Knights Islands. Lesley is completing a BA Hons Graphic Design at Middlesex Polytechnic, England, specialising in scientific illustration. -
NZ Orchid Key: a New Smartphone App for Identifying Native Orchids Murray Dawson1, Jeremy Rolfe, Michael Pratt and Ian St George
NZ Orchid Key: a new smartphone app for identifying native orchids Murray Dawson1, Jeremy Rolfe, Michael Pratt and Ian St George Smartphones have rapidly become the device of choice for New Zealanders and the rest of the world. Their processing power, storage capacity, and portability have come of age, making it possible to run comprehensive productivity apps including identification tools. Uptake of this technology will continue to increase into the foreseeable future. It is timely then that a powerful app for identifying native orchids is now available for smartphones and tablets from the Android Google Play Store and Apple’s iTunes (Fig. 1A–E)2. E Fig. 1 Screenshots of the NZ Orchid Key C app. A, icon, illustrating the mauve sun orchid (Thelymitra malvina). B, start-up screen. C, feature (character) list. D, entity (species) list. E, part of a built-in species profile. This free app, called the NZ Orchid Key, is easy-to-use, has lots of A colourful photographs, and covers a wide array of plant characters3, including leaves, flowers, habitats, and distribution for identifying native orchids. Users choose whichever characters in the app match the orchid specimen they are identifying through a process of elimination. If a user needs help to understand what a particular character state means, they can bring up an explanation page for it. Each species within the app is supported by a descriptive profile, providing all the information needed to verify the identification. Species D profiles include links out to online B resources on native orchids – the 1 Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, Canterbury, New Zealand; [email protected] 2 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lucidcentral.mobile.nz_orchid and https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/nz-orchid-key/ id1063192594?mt=8 3 In total, 43 characters and 212 character states were chosen for identifying native orchids in the key. -
ORCHID CONSERVATION NEWS the Newsletter of the Orchid Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission
ORCHID CONSERVATION NEWS The Newsletter of the Orchid Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission Issue 1 March 2021 PATHS TOWARD CONSERVATION PROGRESS Orchid workshop at Bogotá Botanic Garden, Colombia in 2017 1 https://www.bgci.org/our-work/plant- Editorial conservation/conservation-prioritisation/ex-situ- At the time of this first Issue of 2021, many challenges surveys/ still lie before us, lots of unknowns yet to be determined with the pandemic at the forefront of our thoughts. We Why am I puzzled? Well firstly, I don’t know where are doing our best to continue our conservation work the figure of 38% has come from. Although encouraging despite constraints whether it be project planning, data progress is being made with Red Listing, I don’t think collection and management, seed banking, evaluating we know how many species are threatened globally. conservation strategies, or continuing studies of orchid Secondly, does just one individual plant count as an ex populations over the long term. With the situ collection? Surely we need to be focusing on unpredictability and randomness of natural events that conserving as far as possible the genetic diversity within may threaten orchid ecosystems, long-term monitoring each species. Thirdly, the table doesn’t tell me whether studies are being re-visited years, even decades after the collection is plants and/or seed. their initiation, to study what has been happening following severe disturbance. For example, Deschênes, The BGCI report asserts that botanical gardens are the Brice & Brisson (2019) have reported, after an initial main repository of orchid collections. -
Orchids of the Wellington District
Orchids of the Wellington District A. P. DRUCE The hills around Wellington have at the present time one of the richest orchid floras in New Zealand. Only the Auckland district surpasses Wellington. Yet few people are aware of this and fewer still have searched closely for these fascinating plants. It is not surprising therefore that several of the orchids growing about Wellington have remained unrecorded for a long time. Altogether forty-two orchid species and varieties are now known from this district. For the purpose of this article the Wellington district is taken to include all the Rimutakas, all the western hills and to extend up to the tops of the Tararua Mountains. Very few orchids are found on the western hills (i.e., the hills to the west of the Hutt Valley and Wellington Harbour) from Cook Strait north to about Haywards. Mixed bush clothed these hills originally—beech was absent. The soils differ from those across the harbour and second-growth is more often tauhinu than manuka. In some way or other the conditions are not right for most of the orchids. Over the rest of the district however, wherever manuka holds sway there are large numbers of orchids of many species. On Mrs. Prasophyllum colensoi (left), Adenochilus gracilis (centre) and Microtis unifolia (right). 4 h Pterostylis nana (left) and Pterostylis barbata (right). Samson's section at Pinehaven for instance over twenty species may be found and a sample area nearby showed that at least 10,000 indi- vidual orchids grow per acre in that locality. There cannot have been anything like these numbers a century ago for most of the manuka land was in bush and the orchids of the bush, besides being different, are comparatively few in number. -
Monocot Fossils Suitable for Molecular Dating Analyses
bs_bs_banner Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 178, 346–374. With 1 figure INVITED REVIEW Monocot fossils suitable for molecular dating analyses WILLIAM J. D. ILES1,2*, SELENA Y. SMITH3, MARIA A. GANDOLFO4 and SEAN W. GRAHAM1 1Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 2University and Jepson Herbaria, University of California, Berkeley, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Bldg, Berkeley, CA 94720-3070, USA 3Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences and Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 2534 CC Little Bldg, 1100 North University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1005, USA 4LH Bailey Hortorium, Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, 410 Mann Library Bldg, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Received 6 June 2014; revised 3 October 2014; accepted for publication 7 October 2014 Recent re-examinations and new fossil findings have added significantly to the data available for evaluating the evolutionary history of the monocotyledons. Integrating data from the monocot fossil record with molecular dating techniques has the potential to help us to understand better the timing of important evolutionary events and patterns of diversification and extinction in this major and ancient clade of flowering plants. In general, the oldest well-placed fossils are used to constrain the age of nodes in molecular dating analyses. However, substantial error can be introduced if calibration fossils are not carefully evaluated and selected. Here we propose a set of 34 fossils representing 19 families and eight orders for calibrating the ages of major monocot clades. We selected these fossils because they can be placed in particular clades with confidence and they come from well-dated stratigraphic sequences. -
Ecology of Vascular Epiphytes in Urban Forests with Special Reference to the Shrub Epiphyte Griselinia Lucida
Ecology of vascular epiphytes in urban forests with special reference to the shrub epiphyte Griselinia lucida A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences at The University of Waikato by Catherine Louise Bryan 2011 Abstract This research investigated the ecology of vascular epiphytes and vines in the Waikato region of the North Island, and the water relations of the shrub hemiepiphyte Griselinia lucida. The main goal was to develop robust recommendations for the inclusion of epiphytic species in urban forest restoration projects. To achieve this, three broad questions were addressed: 1. How are vascular epiphytes and vines distributed throughout the nonurban and urban areas of the Waikato region, and how does this compare to other North Island areas? 2. Why are some epiphyte and vine species absent from urban Hamilton and what opportunities exist for their inclusion in restoration projects? 3. How does Griselinia lucida respond to desiccation stress and how does this compare to its congener G. littoralis? To investigate questions one and two, an ecological survey of the epiphyte communities on host trees in Waikato (n=649) and Taranaki (n=101) was conducted, alongside canopy microclimate monitoring in five Waikato sites. Results show that epiphyte and vine populations in Hamilton City forests represent only 55.2 % of the total Waikato species pool, and have a very low average of 0.8 epiphyte species per host. In contrast, the urban forests of Taranaki support 87.9 % of the local species pool and have an average of 5.5 species per host tree. -
Spring 2007- 21 Fern Quarterly Spring 2007 President’S Message
THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION P.O. Box 3797 Federal Way, WA 98063-3797 Web site: www.hardyfems.org The Hardy Fern Foundation was founded in 1989 to establish a comprehen¬ sive collection of the world’s hardy ferns for display, testing, evaluation, public education and introduction to the gardening and horticultural community. Many rare and unusual species, hybrids and varieties are being propagated from spores and tested in selected environments for their different degrees of hardiness and ornamental garden value. The primary fern display and test garden is located at, and in conjunction with, The Rhododendron Species Botanical Garden at the Weyerhaeuser Corpo¬ rate Headquarters, in Federal Way, Washington. Satellite fern gardens are at the Stephen Austin Arboretum, Nacogdoches, Texas, Birmingham Botanical Gardens, Birmingham, Alabama, California State University at Sacramento, Sacramento, California, Coastal Maine Botanical Garden, Boothbay, Maine, Dallas Arboretum, Dallas, Texas, Denver Botanic Gardens. Denver, Colorado, Georgeson Botanical Garden, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, Harry P. Leu Garden, Orlando, Florida, Inniswood Metro Gardens, Columbus, Ohio, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, and Strybing Arboretum, San Francisco, California. The fern display gardens are at Bainbridge Island Library, Bainbridge Island, WA, Lakewold, Tacoma, Washington, Les Jardins de Metis, Quebec, Canada, Rotary Gardens, Janesville, Wl, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, and Whitehall Historic Home and Garden, Louisville, KY. Hardy Fern Foundation members participate in a spore exchange, receive a quarterly newsletter and have first access to ferns as they are ready for distribution. Cover Design by Willanna Bradner HARDY FERN FOUNDATION QUARTERLY THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION QUARTERLY Volume 17 No. -
Annual Review of Pteridological Research - 2005
Annual Review of Pteridological Research - 2005 Annual Review of Pteridological Research - 2005 Literature Citations All Citations 1. Acosta, S., M. L. Arreguín, L. D. Quiroz & R. Fernández. 2005. Ecological and floristic analysis of the Pteridoflora of the Valley of Mexico. P. 597. In Abstracts (www.ibc2005.ac.at). XVII International Botanical Congress 17–23 July, Vienna Austria. [Abstract] 2. Agoramoorthy, G. & M. J. Hsu. 2005. Borneo's proboscis monkey – a study of its diet of mineral and phytochemical concentrations. Current Science (Bangalore) 89: 454–457. [Acrostichum aureum] 3. Aguraiuja, R. 2005. Hawaiian endemic fern lineage Diellia (Aspleniaceae): distribution, population structure and ecology. P. 111. In Dissertationes Biologicae Universitatis Tartuensis 112. Tartu University Press, Tartu Estonia. 4. Al Agely, A., L. Q. Ma & D. M. Silvia. 2005. Mycorrhizae increase arsenic uptake by the hyperaccumulator Chinese brake fern (Pteris vittata L.). Journal of Environmental Quality 34: 2181–2186. 5. Albertoni, E. F., C. Palma–Silva & C. C. Veiga. 2005. Structure of the community of macroinvertebrates associated with the aquatic macrophytes Nymphoides indica and Azolla filiculoides in two subtropical lakes (Rio Grande, RS, Brazil). Acta Biologica Leopoldensia 27: 137–145. [Portuguese] 6. Albornoz, P. L. & M. A. Hernandez. 2005. Anatomy and mycorrhiza in Pellaea ternifolia (Cav.) Link (Pteridaceae). Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 40 (Supl.): 193. [Abstract; Spanish] 7. Almendros, G., M. C. Zancada, F. J. Gonzalez–Vila, M. A. Lesiak & C. Alvarez–Ramis. 2005. Molecular features of fossil organic matter in remains of the Lower Cretaceous fern Weichselia reticulata from Przenosza basement (Poland). Organic Geochemistry 36: 1108–1115. 8. Alonso–Amelot, M. E. -
Leather-Leaf Fern's Moth Fauna
23 Brian Patrick Leather-leaf fern’s moth fauna Brian Patrick 15 Laura Kent Place Christchurch Email: [email protected] Leather-leaf fern (Pyrrosia eleagnifolia - Polypodiaceae) is a widespread climbing fern often seen carpeting tree trunks or rock faces where it can cover several square metres. Known as Ngarara wehi to Maori, it is widespread lowland fern species in both moist and dry areas, and shaded forest or open sunny sites. Crowe (2004) illustrated many of New Zealand’s many fern moths in a colourful guide to our fern flora, as does Hoare & Ball (2014) in their coverage of some conspicuous New Zealand moth species. Here I record the moth fauna of leather-leaf fern, noting their life histories and distribution. Moth fauna Remarkably seven, six exclusively, New Zealand moth (Lepidoptera) larvae feed on the succulent leaves and sori of this species as follows: 1. The pretty geometrid, the hook-tip fern looper Sarisa muriferata (Geometridae: Ennominae) has larvae that feed on the leaves in addition to feeding on several other fern species including hounds tongue fern. It dark brown elongate larvae are often found feeding on the foliage of leather-leaf fern where they scrape the thick leaves. It is a widespread lowland moth of indigenous forests throughout New Zealand. 2. A narrow-winged, delicate moth (Fig.1) associated with this fern is the leather-leaf spore-eater Calicotis crucifera (Stathmopodidae) which has whitish larvae that feed on the fern’s sori. Mature fronds of the fern are more elongate than juveniles and have sori on their ventral side.