DOCSLIB.ORG

The Jurisdiction of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Jurisdiction of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Turks and Saint Christopher British Antigua COUNTRY Bahamas Caicos Islands and Nevis Virgin Islands Anguilla Bermuda and Barbuda Saint Lucia Isle of Man Guernsey Cyprus Brunei Kiribati Tuvalu TERRITORIAL Constitutional United Kingdom Constitutional United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom Constitutional Constitutional Crown Crown Sovereign By Agreement between Her Commonwealth Constitutional STATUS Monarchy Overseas Territory Monarchy Overseas Territory Overseas Territory Overseas Territory Monarchy Monarchy Dependency Dependency Base Areas Majesty and the Sultan Independent Republics Monarchy Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to local Appeals to the Appeals to Her JURISDICTION The jurisdiction of the Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Head of State Judicial Committee Majesty in Council Judicial Committee of the Privy Council In the 1930s the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was said to be the final court of appeal for more than a quarter of the world. When the British empire became the Commonwealth of Nations, many member countries chose to retain their legal links with the United Kingdom. Today, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council still hears appeals from many countries worldwide. Outside the British Empire 1937 jurisdiction Present day jurisdiction United Kingdom COUNTRY Cayman Islands Jamaica Although the Judicial Committee is primarily the final Court of Appeal TERRITORIAL United Kingdom Constitutional for Commonwealth territories which have retained the appeal to Her STATUS Overseas Territory Monarchy Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Majesty in Council, it has a varied domestic jurisdiction, some of JURISDICTION which is now enshrined in statute. This too derives from the premise Majesty in Council Majesty in Council that the King was “the fountain of all justice”. Veterinary Surgeons Pastoral Measure 1983 Appeals from Arches of Canterbury and the Chancery of Court of York Prize Courts House of Commons Disqualification Act S.4 1833 Judicial Committee Act Court of Admiralty of Cinque Ports British Antarctic Falkland South Georgia and Trinidad St Helena, Ascension Saint Vincent and British Indian Cook Islands COUNTRY Territory Pitcairn Islands Montserrat Islands South Sandwich Is. and Tobago and Tristan da Cunha Grenada The Grenadines Mauritius Gibraltar Ocean Territory Jersey and Niue TERRITORIAL United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom Commonwealth United Kingdom Constitutional Constitutional Commonwealth United Kingdom United Kingdom Crown Constitutional STATUS Overseas Territory Overseas Territory Overseas Territory Overseas Territory Overseas Territory Independent Republic Overseas Territory Monarchy Monarchy Independent Republics Overseas Territory Overseas Territory Dependency Monarchy Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to the Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to the Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her Appeals to Her JURISDICTION Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Judicial Committee Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Judicial Committee Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council Majesty in Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) Act, 1922
    Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) Act, 1922 CONSTITUTION OF THE IRISH FREE STATE (SAORSTÁT EIREANN) ACT, 1922. AN ACT TO ENACT A CONSTITUTION FOR THE IRISH FREE STATE (SAORSTÁT EIREANN) AND FOR IMPLEMENTING THE TREATY BETWEEN GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND SIGNED AT LONDON ON THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1921. DÁIL EIREANN sitting as a Constituent Assembly in this Provisional Parliament, acknowledging that all lawful authority comes from God to the people and in the confidence that the National life and unity of Ireland shall thus be restored, hereby proclaims the establishment of The Irish Free State (otherwise called Saorstát Eireann) and in the exercise of undoubted right, decrees and enacts as follows:— 1. The Constitution set forth in the First Schedule hereto annexed shall be the Constitution of The Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann). 2. The said Constitution shall be construed with reference to the Articles of Agreement for a Treaty between Great Britain and Ireland set forth in the Second Schedule hereto annexed (hereinafter referred to as “the Scheduled Treaty”) which are hereby given the force of law, and if any provision of the said Constitution or of any amendment thereof or of any law made thereunder is in any respect repugnant to any of the provisions of the Scheduled Treaty, it shall, to the extent only of such repugnancy, be absolutely void and inoperative and the Parliament and the Executive Council of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) shall respectively pass such further legislation and do all such other things as may be necessary to implement the Scheduled Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Antony Bounds Is in the Final Year of a Phd in History at the University of Warwick on the West Indies Federation and British
    1 Antony Bounds is in the final year of a PhD in History at the University of Warwick on the West Indies Federation and British Decolonisation in the Caribbean. ___________________________________________________________________________ The Society for Caribbean Studies Annual Conference Papers edited by Sandra Courtman Copyright remains with the author Vol. 10 2009 ISSN 1471-2024 http://www.caribbeanstudies.org The Conception of the West Indies Federation and the Realities of an Imperial Legacy Antony Bounds The short-lived West Indies Federation (1958-1962) represented an attempt by British and West Indian leaders to create an entity that would provide the peoples of the region with a stable economic and political future once they had achieved independence from colonial rule. It provided Britain with an opportunity to relinquish the financial burden of the region while ensuring that it created a favourable view of its more than 300 years of imperial control. One of the central drivers of British policy in the West Indies was to ensure a successful federation, which would cement Britain’s imperial legacy in the Caribbean. This was not to be the case. By 1962 the West Indies Federation had collapsed due to arguments around finance and freedom of movement. Its two largest members, Jamaica and Trinidad, had been granted their independence as separate nation states and members of the Commonwealth. The idea of federation, for almost three decades seen as synonymous with achieving independence, had by 1962 become unviable. The aim of this paper is to explore the early motives and actions of Britain and the West Indian islands in their attempt to create a successful federation for the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Small States and the Challenge of Sovereignty
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenGrey Repository Small States and the Challenge of Sovereignty: Commonwealth Caribbean Offshore Financial Centers and Tax Competition William B. Vlcek Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations The London School of Economics and Political Science University of London 2006 ABSTRACT The dynamics of inter-state relations and state sovereignty have been disturbed by late-20th century globalisation. Yet the literature on the international system, globalisation and international political economy gives scant attention to the most vulnerable sovereign entities, the small and micro states. One significant exception has been the Commonwealth, with its many small state members. Another is the area of financial crime, and the role of the offshore financial centre (OFC) within global finance. This thesis analyses the efforts of several small Commonwealth states from the Caribbean to maintain their OFCs in the face of an OECD-directed campaign against tax competition. It demonstrates both the contribution made to economic development by an OFC and the successful assertion of sovereignty achieved by these small states. The case study focuses on Caribbean OFCs and the OECD campaign against harmful tax competition during 1998 - 2003. First, the argument that tax competition is a global problem is deconstructed. Three main points from the small states’ response to the OECD position are explored, along with the OECD’s rebuttal. Because the small states are individually at a disadvantage, the thesis provides an exposition of the collective response facilitated by the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commonwealth of Nations
    The Commonwealth of Nations : From Empire Management to International and Transnational Cooperation Virginie Roiron, maître de conférences en en civilisation britannique et du Commonwealth Summary : This course enquires into the evolution of the Commonwealth of Nations from an association within the British Empire and imperial management tool into an independent international organisation. The Commonwealth of Nations, first called the British Commonwealth, was a key instrument in the British decolonisation process. After the decolonisation of Africa at the beginning of the 1960s, the Commonwealth had to work out objectives for itself and find a new role on the international scene. From 1990 on, in addition to its economic commitments, the Commonwealth has focused on the promotion of common political values (democracy, human rights, good governance). The Commonwealth of Nations is an international association of 53 states but it would be better defined as a network, as it has always put non-state actors and informal proceedings at the heart of its particular identity. With both an international and a transnational dimension, the Commonwealth offers an opportunity to reflect on the legacy of former imperial links in today’s international relations, on multilateralism and the circulation of ideas, values, standards in a globalised world, and on the evolution of international relations in the 21st century, and particularly the intervention of new agencies and different forms of diplomacy. Bibliography : Brown J.M., Louis W.R. (ed.), The Oxford
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Future of the Commonwealth
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee The role and future of the Commonwealth Fourth Report of Session 2012–13 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 1 November 2012 HC 114 [Incorporating HC 1810-i, -ii and -iii, Session 2010-12] Published on 15 November 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £23.00 The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated agencies. Current membership Richard Ottaway (Conservative, Croydon South) (Chair) Rt Hon Bob Ainsworth (Labour, Coventry North East) Mr John Baron (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Rt Hon Sir Menzies Campbell (Liberal Democrat, North East Fife) Rt Hon Ann Clwyd (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes (Labour/Co-op, Ilford South) Mark Hendrick (Labour/Co-op, Preston) Andrew Rosindell (Conservative, Romford) Mr Frank Roy (Labour, Motherwell and Wishaw) Rt Hon Sir John Stanley (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) Rory Stewart (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the parliament: Emma Reynolds (Labour, Wolverhampton North East) Mr Dave Watts (Labour, St Helens North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including news items) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/facom.
    [Show full text]
  • Are You Willing to Be Made Nothing? Is Commonwealth Reform Possible?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography Are you willing to be made nothing? Is Commonwealth reform possible? FRANCIS BAERT AND TIMOTHY M. SHAW* Are you willing to be sponged out, erased, cancelled, made nothing? Are you willing to be made nothing? dipped into oblivion? If not, you will never really change.1 The above passage is from ‘Phoenix’, one of the last poems of D. H. Lawrence. Like the firebird, international organizations seem never, or rarely, to die, as Susan Strange has provocatively argued.2 The British empire is long gone, but out of its ashes grew the Commonwealth, a somewhat awkward, idiosyncratic network. It is no surprise, then, that most analyses of the Commonwealth consist of existential musings: for whom and for what purpose does it exist? Its telos is elusive, even for the most ardent followers, such as James Mayall: ‘I think of the modern Commonwealth as a happy accident. If it did not exist it would neither be necessary nor perhaps possible to invent it.’3 Hedley Bull’s comment in the middle of the last century is telling: ‘Too close an inspection might serve only to explode the “myth” of the Commonwealth and accelerate its continuous progress of disintegration’.4 If a recent poll is to be believed, most British people have no idea about the purpose or policies of the Commonwealth: in a survey of 100 senior United Kingdom decision-makers from media, politics and the civil service, only 25 per cent of respondents correctly identified the Commonwealth when its activ- ities were described.5 * We would like to thank Stephen Kingah, Christopher L.
    [Show full text]
  • Sister Islands Newsletter
    HISTORICAL SUMMARY: VIRGIN ISLANDS HISTORY UNLEASHED British Virgin Islands History relies so much on our EMANCIPATION FESTIVAL ACTIVITIES cultural inheritance and the things our ancestors have left inbedded in our minds, souls and hearts. Music, AND CULTURAL ICONS Dance, Language, Foods, Cultural Wear and so much more. BVI EMANCIPATION The Abolition of Slavery Act of 1833 took eect 1st August 1834. In the British Virgin Islands, Emancipation August Tuesday Horse Races Miss BVI Pageant is celebrated by a three day Public Holiday, comprised of three days (the rst Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday in August). This year the holidays fall on the 3rd, 4th and 5th of August 2020. The original Emancipation Proclamation can be found hanging on the wall at Territorial Dish - Fish and Fungi Mount Healthy Wind Mill the High Court. The Sunday Morning Well in Road Town is a Landmark for where the Emancipation Proclamation was read in 1834. It is also a popular Historical Site. Many people living in the territory do not know much about their history, or should I say, Our History but they engage in the celebrations surrounding the events that it is comprised of. Let us rejoice in our Cultural Past but ensure that our knowledge and Sharing thereof is accurate and lasts. BVI Sloop BVI Territorial Wear COMMONWEALTH DAY Formerly called “Empire Day” until 1958 when it was SLAVERY ABOLISHED IN BRITISH EMPIRE changed, it is observed by member states of the Commonwealth of Nations on the second Monday in 1807 – Slave trade abolished in British Empire no March, including in British Virgin Islands, where the slaves carried from Africa in British ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Work in the Commonwealth
    Youth Work in the Commonwealth A Growth Profession Commonwealth Secretariat Youth Work in the Commonwealth A Growth Profession Commonwealth Secretariat 3726_Book.indb 1 24-Jul-17 7:36:22 PM Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom © Commonwealth Secretariat 2017 All rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or otherwise provided it is used only for education purposes and is not for resale, and provided full acknowledgement is given to the Commonwealth Secretariat as the original publisher. Published by the Commonwealth Secretariat Edited by Allison McKechnie Typeset by NovaTechset Private Limited, Bengaluru & Chennai, India Cover image by Andrew Aitchison / Alamy Stock Photo Printed by xx Views and opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors and should in no way be attributed to the institutions to which they affiliated or to the Commonwealth Secretariat. Wherever possible, the Commonwealth Secretariat uses paper sourced from responsible forests or from sources that minimise a destructive impact on the environment. Copies of this publication may be obtained from Publications Section Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7747 6500 Email: [email protected] Web: www.thecommonwealth.org/publications A catalogue record for this publication is available
    [Show full text]
  • View Profile
    New Zealand metres above sea level. Around one-tenth of 1990–2010. A great range of flora, the North Island (113,729 sq km) is depending on latitude and altitude, from mountainous. Its Rotorua area, a much- subtropical rainforest to alpine, with 25 per visited tourist attraction, has boiling mud cent of plants growing above the tree line. pools and geysers. The South Island Many species are unique to New Zealand. (150,437 sq km) is very mountainous; the Arable land comprises two per cent of the Southern Alps extend almost its entire total land area. length; they have many outlying ranges to Wildlife: Fauna are often also unique the north and south-west; there are at least because of geographical isolation, and 223 peaks more than 2,300 metres above include such flightless birds as kiwis, kakapos sea level and 360 glaciers. There are and wekas, and a great diversity of seabirds, numerous lakes, mostly at high altitude, and many rivers, mostly fast-flowing and difficult as well as 400 kinds of marine fish and many to navigate, which are important sources of sea mammals including 32 whale species. hydroelectricity (which provides more than The introduction of land mammals (unknown 90 per cent of the country’s power). Stewart before the arrival of humans, save for three Island, named after Captain Stewart, who species of bat) by successive settlers, Polynesian and European, has seriously KEY FACTS first charted the island in 1809, and (further out) the Auckland Islands lie south of the damaged the habitat of many species, Joined Commonwealth: 1931 (Statute of South Island.
    [Show full text]
  • British Decolonization in the Caribbean
    BRITISH DECOLONIZATION IN THE CARIBBEAN: THE WEST INDIES FEDERATION By SHARON C. SEWELL Bachelor of Arts Bridgewater State College Bridgewater, Massachusetts 1978 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS July, 1997 BRITISH DECOLONIZATION IN THE CARIBBEAN: THE WEST INDIES FEDERATION Thesis Approved: --- o Thesis Adviser Dean of the Graduate College 11 PREFACE In 1947 Great Britain together its Caribbean colonies to discuss the idea of a closer association among them. The British wanted the colonies to Wlite in a federation to which Britain would give independence and entry into the Commonwealth. After World War II it was an accepted view among the larger countries that small nations could not compete economically and survive politically in the modem world. Britain's belief in this theory led them to their offer of 1947. However, in their efforts to rid themselves of their economically poor colonies in the Caribbean, the British failed to take into consideration the insularity they had fostered for years in the area. Although Barbados, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, the Leeward Islands of Antigua, Montserrat, and St. Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla, and the Windward Islands of Dominica, Grenada, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent shared much in common, including their agriculture-based economy and their British heritage, they had lived independently of each other for centuries. Although they agreed to explore the possibility of federation, and even embarked on the venture for four short years, their reluctance to give up their new-found political freedom brought about the collapse of their federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fallout on Countries Downwind from French Pacific Nuclear Weapons
    International Disarmament Institute and Helene & Grant Wilson Center for Social Entrepreneurship Addressing Humanitarian and Environmental Harm from Nuclear Weapons Fallout on Countries Downwind from French Pacific Nuclear Weapons Testing Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Cook Islands, Fiji, Niue, Samoa, Tokelau, Tonga and Tuvalu ‘[The] impact on our fragile ecology and the physical health and mental wellbeing of our people has been profound. We continue to experience epidemics of cancers, chronic diseases and congenital abnormalities as a result of the radioactive fallout.’ – Submission of Fiji, Nauru, Palau, Samoa and Tuvalu to 2016 UN meeting on nuclear disarmament. Executive Summary populations of these countries – some 30 million people – may thus be considered at elevated risk of being victims of Radioactive fallout from French Pacific atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Pacific governments and civil nuclear weapons tests (1966 to 1974) extended beyond of society have played leading roles in efforts to address the French Polynesia and was detected throughout the Pacific harm of nuclear weapons, including testing. The 2017 region, including: Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Cook Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons obligates Islands, Fiji, Niue, assistance to victims and remediation of contaminated Samoa, Tokelau, Tonga environments. These countries should make a concerted and Tuvalu. Mexico effort to ensure all states in the Pacific region – and and Peru also reported beyond – sign and ratify the Treaty. detecting fallout. UK, US and French South Recommendations Pacific territories may Pacific states and the international community should: too have been affected. Venting and leaching of 1. Sign and RATIFY the Treaty on the Prohibition of radioactive materials Nuclear Weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Initiative for the Freedom of Religion Or Belief
    Commonwealth Initiative for the Freedom of Religion or Belief Timeline of the Commonwealth The history of the Commonwealth goes back to the British Empire. However, the Commonwealth as an organisation was formed in 1949. 1884 – Empire described as a ‘Commonwealth of Nations’ 1926 – The United Kingdom (UK) and its dominions agree they are “equal in status” 1930 – The First Commonwealth Games held in Hamilton, Canada (then called the ‘British Empire Games’) 1931 – Statute of Westminster gives legal status to the independence of Australia, Canada, Irish Free State, Newfoundland, New Zealand and South Africa 1931 – Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa join the Commonwealth 1947 – India and Pakistan join The Commonwealth 1948 – Sri Lanka joins The Commonwealth 1949 – Beginning of the modern Commonwealth: leaders of Commonwealth nations agree that members are “free and equal members of the Commonwealth of Nations, freely co-operating in the pursuit of peace, liberty and progress” 1957 – Ghana and Malaysia join The Commonwealth 1960 – Nigeria joins The Commonwealth 1960 – Commonwealth Scholarship and Fellowship Plan set up – helps graduates study in other member countries 1961 – South Africa withdraws from the Commonwealth 1961 – Republic of Cyprus, Sierra Leone, and the United Republic of Tanzania join The Commonwealth 1962 – Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and Uganda join The Commonwealth 1963 – Kenya joins the Commonwealth 1964 – Malawi, Malta and Zambia join The Commonwealth 1965 – The Gambia and Singapore join The Commonwealth 1965
    [Show full text]