DOCSLIB.ORG

Delta Plan Relationship Chart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Future of the Delta Plan ● INTERAGENCY IMPLEMENTATION The final Delta Plan was adopted by the Delta Stewardship COMMITTEE Council in May 2013. The 2009 Delta Reform Act requires Delta Planning Relationships About: Delta Reform Act calls for DSC to establish an Interagency Implementation state and local actions that fit legal definition of a covered Committee to direct actions across agencies action be consistent with Delta Plan policies. to implement Delta Plan. Relation to Delta Plan: Instructions for ● DELTA WATERMASTER ● CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE committee included in Delta Plan. About: Appointed to review Delta water Covered Actions rights and report on activities regarding Mechanism for enforcement of Delta Plan policies Ensures state’s food safety, protection of state’s agriculture from invasive INDEPENDENT SCIENCE BOARD diversions within Delta. species, and promotes California agricultural industry. About: Established by 2009 Delta Reform Act. Relation to Delta Plan: Delta Plan over state and local actions. Local and state agencies mentions Reasonable Use Doctrine, Replaced CALFED Independent Science Board. ● DREDGING AND DREDGE proposing a plan, project, or program that falls under Required to develop scientific program relating subject of a Delta Watermaster Report, MATERIAL PLACEMENT LONG-TERM ● CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY to management of Delta. Provides oversight of ● DELTA SCIENCE PLAN as a valuable tool to promote water use Delta Plan’s “Covered Actions” must file a certification of scientific research, monitoring, and assessment About: Specify how scientific research, MANAGEMENT STRATEGY efficiency. In-Delta enforcement investiga- Coordinates overall state agency response to major disasters in support of About: Coordinate dredging needs and sediment consistency with DSC. If DSC deems it inconsistent, will programs that support adaptive management monitoring, analysis, and data management tions will inform future Delta Plan updates. management in Delta to assist in maintaining local governments. of Delta through periodic reviews. Submits will be coordinated among entities. Work with provide suggestions for revision. Challenge consistency and improving channel function, levee rehabili- results of each review to DSC. multiple agencies to develop plan. determination by submitting appeal to DSC. Delta Plan tation, and ecosystem restoration. Relation to Delta Plan: Lead scientist acts Relation to Delta Plan: Delta Plan called for ● Relation to Delta Plan: Recommendation that updated every 5 years. CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY as liaison and advises DSC. Delta Science Plan by 2013. The document is Protects historical, natural and cultural sites, monitors and controls state now complete.. current efforts in strategy should be continued in manner that supports Delta Plan and coequal lands and waterways, and regulates fish and game use. goals. May be considered by DSC in future Delta Reform Act defines “Covered Actions” as update of Delta Plan. a plan, program or project that meets all of the ● CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ● NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA ● EVALUATION OF POLICY ALTERNATIVES following conditions: Maintains native fish, wildlife, plant species and natural communities ● LAND USE AND RESOURCE FEASIBILITY STUDY TO BENEFIT AGRICULTURE IN DELTA 1. Will occur, in whole or in part, within the boundaries About: Study to designate Delta as a for their intrinsic and ecological value and their benefits to people. MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE About: Proposal to enhance and protect Delta National Heritage Area. Final study in 2012 agriculture. of the Delta or Suisun Marsh; PRIMARY ZONE OF THE DELTA to Congressional Affairs Office for support of Relation to Delta Plan: Delta Reform Act required About: Outlines long-term land use 2. Will be carried out, approved, or funded by the state legislation to establish a Delta NHA. CDFA to submit to DSC. Submitted to DPC for review. ● CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION requirements for the DPC’s Delta Relation to Delta Plan: Recommendation in Provided recommendations included into DPC or local public agency; Primary Zone. Manages California’s state parks. Delta Plan to complete NHA application. Economic Sustainability Plan. 3. Is covered by one or more provisions of the Delta Plan; Relation to Delta Plan: Referenced in ● BAY-DELTA WATER QUALITY and Delta Plan. Local government general CONTROL PLAN ● plans must embrace and support land CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES ● ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY PLAN About: Identifies beneficial uses of water 4. Will have a significant impact on achievement of one use plan. ● DELTA CONSERVANCY STRATEGIC PLAN Responsible for State of California’s management and regulation of About: Includes recommendations that About: Guide Conservancy’s approach to economic in Bay-Delta, water quality objectives for or both of the coequal goals or the implementation water usage. State lead for environmental review of BDCP. inform DSC’s policies regarding socioeconomic development and ecosystem restoration within reasonable protection of those beneficial uses, of government-sponsored flood control programs to sustainability of Delta region. Delta. Released draft 2012. and a program for achieving water quality Lead agency for flood emergency response. Relation to Delta Plan: Delta Reform Act Relation to Delta Plan: Delta Plan has recommen- objectives. Undergoing update, including reduce risks to people, property, and state interests in required DPC to submit to DSC. Submitted dations to complete and implement Strategic Plan. water quality objectives and Delta outflow and the Delta. 2011. Delta Plan drew information from plan Delta Plan drew information from Strategic Plan to inflow requirements, and changes to water CENTRAL VALLEY FLOOD PROTECTION BOARD to form Chapter 5. form Chapter 5. rights and water quality regulations. Manages flood control along Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and ● DELTA PLAN Relation to Delta Plan: Delta Plan policy for About: Integrates decision making regarding SWRCB to update flow objectives and schedule tributaries in cooperation with USACE. Delta ecosystem, water use and flood manage- for adoption for Delta (by 2014) and high ment to achieve coequal goals. DSC required to priority tributaries (by 2018). Delta Plan recom- ● DELTA PROTECTION COMMISSION consult with federal, state and local agencies in mends water quality in Delta be maintained at developing Delta Plan, and requires agencies to a level that supports, enhances, and protects Established 1992 and reorganized by 2009 Delta Reform Act as a cooperate with DSC in developing Plan. Plans, beneficial uses in SWRCB plan. 15- member planning and regulatory entity. Responsible for protecting Related to Included in Helped Inform projects and programs in Delta with significant impact on coequal goals must be consistent with and where possible enhancing and restoring Delta environment and ● Delta Plan Delta Plan Delta Plan Delta Plan. Delta Plan contains policies and many ● QUANTIFIABLE BIOLOGICAL Copyright 2014 making determinations on development in Delta. Provide input on recommendations (see below.) Adopted 2013. DEVELOPMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND FLOW CRITERIA Recommendations FLOW CRITERIA FOR THE About: Delta Reform Act required DFW to actions that impact Delta as a place. SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN ● REGIONAL FLOOD RESPONSE develop quantifiable biological objectives and ● RECREATION PROPOSAL DELTA ECOSYSTEM PROJECT or Policies flow criteria for species of concern dependent About: Proposal to expand state About: Assessment of flows needed on the Delta and submit to SWRCB by 2010. ● DELTA STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL About: Brings local jurisdictions together to recreation areas in Delta. to protect the Delta and its ecological Developed in consultation with USFWS and jointly identify projects to enhance response Created by 2009 Delta Reform Act to create and implement a plan to achieve Relation to Delta Plan: Delta Reform resources completed in 2010. ● SUISUN MARSH PROTECTION PLAN NMFS. to flood impacts and seek funding for Act required CDPR submit to DSC. Relation to Delta Plan: Considered in About: Long-range conservation, use and Relation to Delta Plan: Informed SWRCB’s coequal goals. implementation. The five Delta counties , Submitted 2011 to inform DPC Economic ● BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN development of Delta Plan and must be management of natural, scenic, recreational Delta flow criteria which was considered DPC, DWR and local maintaining agencies Sustainability Plan. and manmade resources implemented in Suisun About: Habitat restoration plan to restore considered by BDCP. in development of Delta Plan and must be are working together to address multiagency Marsh Preservation Act. ● SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA CONSERVANCY habitat and get permits for water exporters considered by BDCP. collaboration and coordination through flood Relation to Delta Plan: Recommendation to to continue water conveyance. BDCP will Established by 2009 Delta Reform Act. Leads efforts that advance emergency response grant opportunities. The DELTA MULTI-HAZARD update Suisun Marsh Protection Plan to adapt to recommend a plan to convey water under, priority is local and regional planning with sea level rise and ensure consistency with Suisun environmental protection in Delta and economic well-being of COORDINATION TASK FORCE through or around Delta. flood response agencies. About: Developed by SB27 to address emergency Marsh Preservation Act, Delta Reform
Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office

    0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office

    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK

    Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
  • 22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967

    22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967

    19 SEP 2021 Index 543 Au Sable Point 14863 �� � � � � 324, 331 Belle Isle 14976 � � � � � � � � � 493 Au Sable Point 14962, 14963 �� � � � 468 Belle Isle, MI 14853, 14848 � � � � � 290 Index Au Sable River 14863 � � � � � � � 331 Belle River 14850� � � � � � � � � 301 Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Res- Belle River 14852, 14853� � � � � � 308 cue System (AMVER)� � � � � 13 Bellevue Island 14882 �� � � � � � � 346 Automatic Identification System (AIS) Aids Bellow Island 14913 � � � � � � � 363 A to Navigation � � � � � � � � 12 Belmont Harbor 14926, 14928 � � � 407 Au Train Bay 14963 � � � � � � � � 469 Benson Landing 14784 � � � � � � 500 Acadia Rock 14967, 14968 � � � � � 491 Au Train Island 14963 � � � � � � � 469 Benton Harbor, MI 14930 � � � � � 381 Adams Point 14864, 14880 �� � � � � 336 Au Train Point 14969 � � � � � � � 469 Bete Grise Bay 14964 � � � � � � � 475 Agate Bay 14966 �� � � � � � � � � 488 Avon Point 14826� � � � � � � � � 259 Betsie Lake 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agate Harbor 14964� � � � � � � � 476 Betsie River 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agriculture, Department of� � � � 24, 536 B Biddle Point 14881 �� � � � � � � � 344 Ahnapee River 14910 � � � � � � � 423 Biddle Point 14911 �� � � � � � � � 444 Aids to navigation � � � � � � � � � 10 Big Bay 14932 �� � � � � � � � � � 379 Baby Point 14852� � � � � � � � � 306 Air Almanac � � � � � � � � � � � 533 Big Bay 14963, 14964 �� � � � � � � 471 Bad River 14863, 14867 � � � � � � 327 Alabaster, MI 14863 � � � � � � � � 330 Big Bay 14967 �� � � � � � � � � � 490 Baileys
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy

    Transitions for the Delta Economy

    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
  • Section 11 – Reclamation Districts

    Section 11 – Reclamation Districts

    Section 11 Reclamation Districts Contra Costa LAFCO August 2019 Directory of Local Agencies Section 11 – Reclamation Districts This page left intentionally blank Contra Costa LAFCO August 2019 Directory of Local Agencies Section 11 – Reclamation Districts Reclamation District RECLAMATION DISTRICT 799 (Hotchkiss Tract) (Special Act of California Legislature, Statutes 1911:342, California Water Code §50300 et seq.) Location of office 6325 Bethel Island Rd. Bethel Island, CA 94511 Mailing address PO Box 353 Bethel Island, CA 94511 Telephone numbers (925) 684-2398 FAX number (925) 684-2399 Web page www.rd799.com E-mail address [email protected] BOARD OF DIRECTORS Five members elected for four-year terms Meetings: Last Thursday of each month; 6:00 PM District Board Members Began serving Expiration of term Walter Pierce 10/2016 11/2021 Jim Price 11/2014 11/2021 Arthur Hanson 11/2013 11/2021 Richard Kent 3/2014 11/2019 Karla Fratus 1/2015 11/2019 STAFF Mike Alvarez District Manager Dina Holder District Secretary Barbara Brenner (Churchwell White) Legal Counsel INFORMATION Year Formed: 1911 Area Served: Oakley Population Served: 2,000 per CCC Dept. of Conservation & Development Size: Approximately 3,100 acres Services provided Maintenance and operation of levees and related drainage facilities Contra Costa LAFCO Directory of Local Agencies August 2019 Page 11-1 Contra Costa LAFCO Directory of Local Agencies August 2019 Page 11-2 Reclamation District RECLAMATION DISTRICT 800 (Byron Tract) (California Water Code §50300 et seq.) Location of
  • Cultural Resources

    Cultural Resources

    C ULTURAL R ESOURCES B ACKGROUND R EPORT Cultural and Paleontological Resources In This Background Report Page Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................... 3 Prehistoric Overview ............................................................................................................... 3 Historic Setting ....................................................................................................................... 6 Paleontological Setting ......................................................................................................... 11 P AGE CUL‐ 1 C ITY OF S UISUN C ITY G ENERAL P LAN Regulatory Context .................................................................................................................. 12 California Environmental Quality Act .................................................................................... 12 Health and Safety Code, Section 7052 and 7050.5 ................................................................. 15 California State Senate Bill 18 ............................................................................................... 15 Local Codes, Ordinances, and Regulations............................................................................ 16 Known Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................
  • Trends in Hydrology and Salinity in Suisun Bay and the Western Delta

    Trends in Hydrology and Salinity in Suisun Bay and the Western Delta

    Trends in Hydrology and Salinity in Suisun Bay and the Western Delta Draft Version 1.2 June 2007 DRAFT Trends in Hydrology and Salinity in Suisun Bay and the Western Delta Draft Version 1.2 Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 2 Objective..................................................................................................................................... 2 Approach..................................................................................................................................... 2 Conclusions................................................................................................................................. 3 Report Structure.......................................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 8 1.1. Objectives of this review ................................................................................................. 8 1.2. Salinity Units................................................................................................................... 9 1.3. Temporal and Spatial Variability................................................................................... 13 1.4. Report Structure............................................................................................................
  • Food Webs of the Delta, Suisun Bay, and Suisun Marsh: an Update on Current Understanding and Possibilities for Management Larry R

    Food Webs of the Delta, Suisun Bay, and Suisun Marsh: an Update on Current Understanding and Possibilities for Management Larry R

    OCTOBER 2016 SPECIAL ISSUE: STATE OF BAY–DELTA SCIENCE 2016, PART 2 Food Webs of the Delta, Suisun Bay, and Suisun Marsh: An Update on Current Understanding and Possibilities for Management Larry R. Brown1*, Wim Kimmerer2, J. Louise Conrad3, Sarah Lesmeister3, and Anke Mueller–Solger1 to species of concern; however, data from other Volume 14, Issue 3 | Article 4 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss3art4 regions of the estuary suggest that this conceptual model may not apply across the entire region. * Corresponding author: [email protected] Habitat restoration has been proposed as a method 1 California Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey of re-establishing historic food web processes to Sacramento, CA 95819 USA support species of concern. Benefits are likely for 2 Romberg Tiburon Center, San Francisco State University Tiburon, CA 94920 USA species that directly access such restored habitats, 3 California Department of Water Resources but are less clear for pelagic species. Several topics Sacramento, CA 95691 USA require attention to further improve the knowledge of food webs needed to support effective management, including: (1) synthesis of factors responsible for ABSTRACT low pelagic biomass; (2) monitoring and research on effects of harmful algal blooms; (3) broadening This paper reviews and highlights recent research the scope of long-term monitoring; (4) determining findings on food web processes since an earlier benefits of tidal wetland restoration to species of review by Kimmerer et al. (2008). We conduct this concern, including evaluations of interactions of review within a conceptual framework of the Delta– habitat-specific food webs; and (5) interdisciplinary Suisun food web, which includes both temporal and analysis and synthesis.
  • Suisun Marsh Fish Report 2018 Final.Pdf

    Suisun Marsh Fish Report 2018 Final.Pdf

    Trends in Fish and Invertebrate Populations of Suisun Marsh January 2018 - December 2018 Annual Report for the California Department of Water Resources Sacramento, California Teejay A. O'Rear*, Peter B. Moyle, and John R. Durand Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Center for Watershed Sciences University of California, Davis October 2020 *Corresponding author: [email protected] SUMMARY Suisun Marsh, at the geographic center of the northern San Francisco Estuary, is important habitat for native and non-native fishes. The University of California, Davis, Suisun Marsh Fish Study, in partnership with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), has systematically monitored the marsh's fish populations since January 1980. The study’s main purpose has been to determine environmental and anthropogenic factors affecting fish distribution and abundance. Abiotic conditions in Suisun Marsh during calendar-year 2018 returned to fairly typical levels following the very wet year of 2017. Delta outflow was generally low, with higher-than- average outflows only occurring in April when Yolo Bypass flooded. Salinities in 2018 were about average, in part because of Suisun Marsh Salinity Control Gates operations in late summer. Water temperatures were mild, being higher than average in winter and autumn and slightly below average during summer. Water transparencies were typical in winter and spring but, as has become a pattern since the early 2000s, were higher than average in summer and autumn. Dissolved-oxygen concentrations were consistent throughout the year, with only two instances of low values being recorded, both in dead-end sloughs. Fish and invertebrate catches in Suisun Marsh in 2018 told two main stories: (1) many fishes benefit from higher flows and lower salinities in Suisun Marsh while some invasive invertebrates do not; and (2) Suisun Marsh is disproportionately valuable to fishes of conservation importance.
  • NMFS and USFWS Biological Assessment

    NMFS and USFWS Biological Assessment

    LOS GATOS CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT / SOUTH TERMINAL PHASE III PROJECT NMFS and USFWS Biological Assessment Prepared for Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board 1250 San Carlos Avenue P.O. Box 3006 San Carlos, California 94070-1306 and the Federal Transit Administration Region IX U.S. Department of Transportation 201 Mission Street Suite1650 San Francisco, CA 94105-1839 Prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc. 2379 Gateway Oaks Drive Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95833 August 2013 NMFS and USFWS Biological Assessment Prepared for Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board 1250 San Carlos Avenue P.O. Box 3006 San Carlos, California 94070-1306 and the Federal Transit Administration Region IX U.S. Department of Transportation 201 Mission Street Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94105-1839 Prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc. 2379 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95833 August 2013 This page left blank intentionally. Summary The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) which operates the San Francisco Bay Area’s Caltrain passenger rail service proposes to replace the two-track railroad bridge that crosses Los Gatos Creek, in the City of San Jose, Santa Clara County, California. The Proposed Action is needed to address the structural deficiencies and safety issues of the Caltrain Los Gatos Creek railroad bridge to be consistent with the standards of safety and reliability required for public transit, to ensure that the bridge will continue to safely carry commuter rail service well into the future, and to improve operations at nearby San Jose Diridon Station and along the Caltrain rail line. This Biological Assessment (BA) has been prepared for the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and U.S.
  • Bradford Island Reclamation District 2059

    Bradford Island Reclamation District 2059

    Newsletter for Proposition 218 May 2020 Bradford Island Reclamation District # 2059 Welcome to Beautiful Bradford Island Bradford Island is in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and is comprised of approximately 2,385 acres of predominately agricultural and recreational land, and it enjoys the isolation and protection of only being accessible by ferry. Why was Reclamation District How can landowners get more What are the requirements the # 2059 Formed? Involved? District must meet? Bradford was formed to address the RD # 2059 is served by landowner As an independent special district, flood protection concerns on Bradford volunteers on the Board of Trustees RD #2059 must comply with statutory Island, landowners formed the (“Board”), which takes public input requirements for local agencies, Bradford Island Reclamation District from all Bradford Island landowners. including those found in the California # 2059 (“District” or “RD # 2059”) by Bradford Island can only continue to Water Code, Government Code, the petition of landowners in 1921. The flourish with landowner involvement California Constitution, and any other District was formed under the laws of and a united commitment to controlling local, state, or federal law, the State of California and is protecting the island. Here are some as well as the District’s own Bylaws. governed by Division 15 of the opportunities for you to get involved: RD # 2059 is governed by a Board of California Water Code (commencing • Attend and provide input at Trustees (“Board”) which consists of with
  • Trends in Fish and Invertebrate Populations of Suisun Marsh January 2017

    Trends in Fish and Invertebrate Populations of Suisun Marsh January 2017

    Trends in Fish and Invertebrate Populations of Suisun Marsh January 2017 - December 2017 Annual Report for the California Department of Water Resources Sacramento, California Teejay A. O'Rear, Peter B. Moyle, and John R. Durand Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Center for Watershed Sciences University of California, Davis January 2019 SUMMARY Suisun Marsh, at the geographic center of the northern San Francisco Estuary, is important habitat for native and non-native fishes. The University of California, Davis, Suisun Marsh Fish Study, in partnership with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), has systematically monitored the marsh's fish populations since January 1980. The study’s main purpose has been to determine environmental and anthropogenic factors affecting fish distribution and abundance. Calendar year 2017 was wet and warm. Very high Delta outflows resulted in nearly freshwater conditions throughout Suisun Marsh from January to July, with lower-than-average salinities persisting until November. Matching the local climate, water temperatures were generally warmer than usual. Unlike most of the last 10 years when water transparencies greatly increased relative to the average in summer and autumn, water transparencies stayed near or below average for the latter half of 2017. Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations were sufficient for marsh fishes except in March in upper Goodyear Slough, when DO concentrations dipped below 3 milligrams per liter (mg/L). The aquatic community of Suisun Marsh responded to the wet, warm conditions. Non- native overbite clams (Potamocorbula amurensis), which require a salinity of at least 2 parts per thousand (ppt) for successful reproduction, were never abundant in 2017.