DOCSLIB.ORG

Most Precious Message in the Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Most Precious Message in the Review THREE R&H ARTICLES ON ABOUT THE "MOST PRECIOUS MESSAGE IN THE REVIEW OCT 13 2013 BY GEORGE R. KNIGHT Dear Brethren Who Shall Assemble in General Conference: We are impressed that this gathering will be the most important meeting you have ever attended. This should be a period of earnestly seeking the Lord, and humbling your hearts before Him.1 Such were the words of Ellen White on August 5, 1888, in a letter circulated to the delegates who would be attending the forthcoming session of the General Conference in October at Minneapolis, Minnesota. She not only highlighted the importance of the meetings but also hinted at tensions among the delegates and their need for serious and faithful Bible study. TENSION IN THE CAMP The tension didn’t take long to surface. “Elder Smith,” A. T. Jones blurted out early in the meetings, “has told you he does not know anything about this matter. I do, and I don’t want you to blame me for what he does not know.” Ellen White responded with “Not so sharp, brother Jones, not so sharp.”2 Unfortunately, such harsh words and pompous attitudes provided part of the backdrop for the conflict that characterized the 1888 General Conference session. Jones had no monopoly on the harsh-words front. Ellen White repeatedly faulted General Conference president George I. Butler and Review and Herald editor Uriah Smith for what she labeled as the spirit of the Pharisees. Those leaders and their friends repeatedly expressed an attitude that “burdened” her, being “so unlike the spirit of Jesus.” Its sarcastic, critical, self-righteous aspects, she noted, stirred up “human passions” and “bitterness of spirit, because some of their brethren had ventured to entertain some ideas contrary to the ideas that some others . had entertained, which were thought . to be inroads upon ancient doctrines.”3 THE “MEN” OF MINNEAPOLIS The battle lines of the 1888 session had arisen earlier in the decade over two theological points, and involved certain major participants. On one side were the two young editors of the California-based Signs of the Times—Ellet J. Waggoner and Alonzo T. Jones [see fuller biographies on pages 20, 21]. A trained physician who preferred the work of gospel ministry, Waggoner was probably the most gentle and sophisticated of the major male leaders in the struggle. His colleague, A. T. Jones, had been a sergeant in the United States Army and had all the attributes of his first profession. Jones never ran away from a battle, whether it be a frontier confrontation or one in the halls of Congress over church/state issues or with his fellow church leaders. Of somewhat the same mold were George I. Butler and Uriah Smith, president and secretary, respectively, of the General Conference. Smith was also editor of the Michigan-based Review and Herald and the denomination’s authority on the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation. Butler and Smith viewed themselves as defenders of traditional Adventism, especially in the face of the new ideas being set forth by Jones and Waggoner. A fifth major participant in the Minneapolis meetings was Ellen G. White, Adventism’s prophetic voice. At first it appears that she sought to remain neutral in the developing struggle. But by April 1887 she had come out openly in support of the younger men from the West. She not only realized that they had something to say that the denomination desperately needed to hear, but she also had concluded that they were being wrongly treated in a very unequal struggle. She would dedicate herself to making sure that Jones and Waggoner and their ideas would get a fair hearing at the forthcoming General Conference session. CONTROVERSY OVER THE HORNS IN DANIEL The rumbles of disharmony had begun in the early 1880s along two lines that would build in intensity as the denomination rolled toward the Minneapolis meetings. The first point of contention formed up around the seemingly minor topic of the identity of the 10 horns of Daniel 7. The 1884 General Conference session had commissioned Jones to “write a series of articles gathered from history on points that showed the fulfillment of prophecy,”4 a task that led him to study the book of Daniel. Smith initially expressed joy over the idea of Jones having the time to undertake a more complete examination of the 10 kingdoms, but suggested that it would be a difficult task—somewhat like “hunting the pieces of a building” after it had been “struck by a hundred pounds of dynamite.”5 The cordial relationship between the newcomer to the study of Daniel and the established author of Daniel and Revelation rapidly deteriorated after Jones concluded that Smith’s published list was incorrect on the identity of the tenth kingdom, with Jones asserting it was the Alemanni rather than the Huns. The difference of opinion mattered, because getting prophecy right mattered to Adventists anticipating the world’s imminent end. Throughout the 1880s Adventists were being arrested in such states as California, Tennessee, and Arkansas for the “crime” of working on Sunday. Some Adventist ministers in the American South were even serving on chain gangs with hardened criminals. The tension would build on the Sunday front until the spring of 1888, when H. W. Blair introduced a bill into the United States Senate to promote the observance of “the Lord’s day” “as a day of religious worship.”6 Blair’s national Sunday bill was the first such legislation to go before Congress since the establishment of the Adventist movement in the 1840s. The denomination connected that move with the forming of the image to the beast of Revelation 13 and the giving of the mark of the beast. The end was clearly near, and accurate prophetic interpretation was clearly crucial. Smith argued aggressively that if Adventists began to change their understanding on points of prophetic interpretation that had stood for 40 years, “thousands would instantly notice the change. ‘If we give you time enough,’ they would then say, ‘you will probably come to acknowledge finally that you are mistaken on everything.’ ” Jones shot back that it was more important to be right than to maintain a faulty position that would be exposed publicly by the denomination’s enemies.7 CRISIS OVER THE LAW IN GALATIANS But if the crisis over the 10 horns was intense, the issue of the identity of the law referred to in the book of Galatians was literally explosive. With the Sunday crisis right upon them it was bad enough to be tinkering with the validity of Adventist prophetic interpretation, but to be making major changes in the denomination’s theology of the law could spell total disaster. An important text that Adventists had to deal with was the “added” law of Galatians 3:19-25. For three decades the denomination had interpreted that law as the ceremonial law. Such an interpretation, Adventist leaders held, was important in guarding the perpetuity of the Ten Commandments. After all, did not Galatians 3:25 plainly teach that once an individual had faith, he or she was “no longer under a schoolmaster”? The law in Galatians had become a controversial issue between 1884 and 1886, when Waggoner began to teach that Galatians had the Ten Commandments in mind rather than the ceremonial law. That understanding was met head on by Butler and Smith, who held that the new interpretation undermined Adventism’s traditional position on the end-time importance of the law of God. As might be expected, the national Sunday crisis heightened the importance of the topic. Butler sought to solve the problem at the 1886 General Conference session, but failed. His next move was to block Jones and Waggoner from presenting their views at the 1888 session. But Ellen White outmaneuvered him by publicly coming to the support of the younger men. The stage at that point was set for the controversial Minneapolis meetings. THE MINNEAPOLIS MEETINGS The 1888 General Conference session convened in the newly constructed Adventist church from October 17 through November 4. A ministerial institute lasting from October 10 to 16 preceded the formal conference session. The agenda contained two categories of items: business matters and theological concerns. While official action on the business items was restricted to the official session, action and reaction on the theological issues flowed from the institute into the regular session as if they were one meeting. As expected, the major issues of substance in the conference centered on three issues—two controversial and one agreed upon. In the latter category were Jones’ lectures on church and state in relation to the Sunday law crisis. The conference voted to publish his presentations. They came off the press, with some editing, in 1889 as Civil Government and Religion, or Christianity and the American Constitution. In the controverted realm, Jones and Smith each spoke several times on the 10 horns and related prophetic topics. But the major subject of contention and importance was the lectures of E. J. Waggoner on righteousness by faith. Interestingly enough, his focal point was not on the law in Galatians (although he did not neglect that topic) but on issues related to salvation. For him the connection between the law in Galatians and righteousness by faith is the fact that experientially the 10 commandments point out sin and lead individuals to Christ as Savior. Contrary to Waggoner’s approach, J. H. Morrison (who stood in for the emotionally exhausted Butler who was too ill to attend the meetings) presented at least eight lectures focused on the nature of the law in Galatians.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exposing the Skeleton in the SDA Closet of 1888
    1 Exposing the Skeleton in the S.D.A. Closet of 1888 Unsealing the Mystery of the 1888 General Conference Meetings in Minneapolis Part 1 By Norman Bradley his article may be difficult to understand if you were not raised a Seventh-day Adventist; however, it is full of very important information. There has always been T a mystery as to what really happened at the 1888 Minneapolis General Conference meeting that created such an upheaval to the Seventh-day Adventist church. Many books and articles have been written about it over the past 120 years. This article has a lot of negative things to be charged against past leaders of our church. A few guilty names will be exposed. More recent leaders have perpetuated this wrong teaching unknowingly. Unless they have researched the Archives, and the 1888 Materials by Ellen White, and the original Jones‘ and Waggoner‘s writings, [not just the censored ones], they might not otherwise know what this article reveals. 1 2 I‘m sure most Seventh-day Adventist leaders today are honest God-fearing men and if they stay true to their calling, then they will help to correct this erroneous teaching that still prevails in our church today. This wrong teaching that started long before 1888, but certainly erupted at that time, is very likely keeping the Latter Rain from falling on God‘s people today. It can and will be corrected, God will make sure of that. And the Devil will make war against it, as he always does when truth is brought to the light.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh-Day Adventism, Doctrinal Statements, and Unity
    Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 27/1-2 (2016): 98-116. Article copyright © 2016 by Michael W. Campbell. Seventh-day Adventism, Doctrinal Statements, and Unity Michael W. Campbell Adventist International Institute of Advanced Studies Cavite, Philippines 1. Introduction “All Christians engage in confessional synthesis,” wrote theologian Carl R. Trueman.1 Some religious groups adhere to a public confession of faith as subject to public scrutiny whereas others are immune to such scrutiny. Early Seventh-day Adventists, with strong ties to the Christian Connexion, feared lest the creation of a statement of beliefs so that some at some point may disagree with that statement may at some point be excluded.2 Another danger was that statements of belief might be used to present making new discoveries from Scripture, or afterward a new truth might be stifled by appealing to the authority of an already established creed. From the perspective of early Sabbatarian Adventists, some remembered the time when during the Millerite revival that statements of belief were used to exclude them from church fellowship.3 These fears were aptly expressed during the earliest organizational developments in 1861 of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. According to denominational co-founder, James White: “making a creed is setting the stakes, and barring up the way to all future advancement. The Bible is 1 Carl R. Trueman, The Creedal Imperative (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2012), 21. 2 Bert B. Haloviak, “Heritage of Freedom,” unpublished manuscript, 2. 3 George R. Knight, A Search for Identity: The Development of Seventh-day Adventist Beliefs (Hagerstown, MD: Review and Herald, 2000), 21-24.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minneapolis General Conference Cy!Bwno Cw
    VOL U ME 7 FOURlli QUARTER, 1997 N U MBER 4 ADVENTIST PIONEER LIBRARY : ~ ,,:' ,: ~, , ,: ····s" " ·····t.·.·····.[.· ;fe··L"',i,.,·"j· •.,.;/.,: "",:./' "We have nothing to fearfor the future, except as we shallforget the way the Lordhas led us, andHis teaching in ourpast history. " LS 196 The Minneapolis General Conference Cy!Bwno cw. aldnw<9 Clheofojian and ,eti,ed mi~~iona.,y to ~oul~ and Cent,a.!cI1me,iaa. he General Conference of1888, heldin Minneapolis, Minnesota, is consideredone ofthe mostimportant General Conferences ever held by the Seventh-day Adventist Church. During this Conference, Seventh­ dayAdventistsbegan to emphasize the message ofRighteousness byFaith. In spite ofthe misunderstand­ ingsthisConferencegenerated, it wasa turningpointin the importantteachingofRighteousnessbyFaith. TThere were those who claimedthe subjectwas notimportant because it wasnotamongthe"land-marks " ~==::; or "pillars" to be given the world. Butin Revelation14:12, the Three Angels'Messages close with these words: "Here is the patience ofthe saints, here are those who keep the commandments ofGod and the faith ofJesus. " REASONS FOR THE CONTROVERSY AT MINNEAPOLIS ofthe Times (then a weekly), believed that the law The tension at the Conference did not come di­ spoken of in Galatians 3:24 was the Moral Law, rectly from the presentation of Righteousness by whereas the almost unanimous position held by de­ Faith. Rather it came from divergent views held on nominational leaders at that time was that Galatians other subjects by Alonzo T. Jones and Ellet J. spoke of the Ceremonial Law. A. T. Jones believed Waggoner, who led out in the presentation of Right­ that theAlemanni and not the Huns, shouldbe counted eousness by Faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Eternity Marius Munteanu by Lisa M
    THE JOURNAL OF ADVENTISTWebsite: http://jae.adventist.org EDUCATION April-June 2017 E DUCATINGD U C A T I N G FORF O R E TERNITY TheThe GreatGreat TheThe DivineDivine CognitiveCognitive andand IIncreasingncreasing SStrengtheningtrengthening CCommissionommission BBlueprintlueprint fforor NNon-cognitiveon-cognitive SStudenttudent AAccessccess AAdventistdventist and the Education Factors in K-12 Education Education in Educational Contributing the North Imperative to Academic American Division Success SPECIALSee page 37 ISSUE The Journal of CONTENTS ADVENTIST EDUCATION EDITOR Faith-Ann McGarrell EDITOR EMERITUS Beverly J. Robinson-Rumble ASSOCIATE EDITOR S PECIAL I SSUE (INTERNATIONAL EDITION) Julián Melgosa SENIOR CONSULTANTS John Wesley Taylor V Lisa M. Beardsley-Hardy Geoffrey G. Mwbana, Ella Smith Simmons CONSULTANTS APRIL-JUNE 2017 • VOLUME 79, NO. 3 GENERAL CONFERENCE John M. Fowler, Mike Mile Lekic, Hudson E. Kibuuka EAST-CENTRAL AFRICA Andrew Mutero EURO-AFRICA 3 Editorial: Educating for Eternity Marius Munteanu By Lisa M. Beardsley-Hardy EURO-ASIA Vladimir Tkachuk INTER-AMERICA 4 The Great Commission and the Educational Imperative Gamaliel Florez By George R. Knight MIDDLE EAST-NORTH AFRICA Leif Hongisto NORTH AMERICA 11 The State of Adventist Education Report Larry Blackmer By Lisa M. Beardsley-Hardy NORTHERN ASIA-PACIFIC Richard A. Saubin SOUTH AMERICA 16 CognitiveGenesis: Cognitive and Non-cognitive Factors Edgard Luz Contributing to Academic Success in Adventist Education SOUTH PACIFIC By Elissa Kido Carol Tasker SOUTHERN AFRICA-INDIAN OCEAN EllMozecie Kadyakapitando 20 The Divine Blueprint for Education—A Devotional SOUTHERN ASIA By George W. Reid Prabhu Das R N SOUTHERN ASIA-PACIFIC 22 Increasing Student Access in K to 12 Education: A Challenge Lawrence L.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Uriah Smith and the King of the North in Dan 11:36-39 and 40-45
    Hardy Dan 11:36-39 Appendix Uriah Smith and the King of the North in Dan 11:36-39 and 40-45 In the Daniel file at the Biblical Research Institute (General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists) in Washington, DC is a paper by Raymond F. Cottrell entitled, "The Pioneers on Daniel Eleven and Armageddon." In that paper Cottrell discusses the development of Uriah Smith's views on Dan 11 against the backdrop of positions then current both within his own denomination (James White) and outside it (the popular Protestant commentators of his day). Smith in relation to exegetes outside his denomination It was Smith's purpose to show that the Seventh-day Adventist system of prophetic interpretation was largely based on positions shared by other religious bodies. Thus, it was not our positions but our synthesis of them, our perspective, that made the Seventh-day Adventist system of prophetic interpretation unique. His initial books on the subject, Thoughts on Revelation (first published 1865) and Thoughts on Daniel (first published 1873), were drawn from articles he had published as editor of the Review and Herald , which at this time was largely written for a non-Adventist readership. At first Smith held that the king of the North in Dan 11:40-45 was Rome. But then he espoused the popular view of his day that it was Turkey--the "sick man of the east." The religious press during the 1870s was filled with speculations about the demise of Turkey as a viable power in Europe and Smith was caught up in this line of thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-The Imminent Christ: Justification Within
    From Crisis to Victory: Putting the Gospel back into the Three Angels Messages 02-The Imminent Christ: Justification Within Karl Wagner, November 7, 2020; 9:30 AM, Sabbath Morning I-Waggoner’s journey for unity with the deity: The Imminent Christ. 1. Parallel with 1st century Christian mysticism a. Mysticism is integral to Christian monasticism because the goal of the practice for the monastic is union with the deity. b. Driven by his ecstatic experience i. “It seems abundantly evident that his immanent views of the indwelling Christ, fueled with his panentheistic philosophy, did play a vital role in the development of his spiritualistic doctrine of ‘spiritual affinities’ and their ‘free-love’ tendencies.”1 2. Three Views of Minneapolis2 a. Uriah Smith, editor of the general church paper, and George Butler, president of the General Conference, and most of the pre-1888 SDA ministry, held that justification involved primarily a means of obtaining forgiveness for "sins of the past." Faith enabled adequate obedience and thus sufficient righteousness to pass the soon-coming final judgment. While sanctification thus overshadowed justification, the latter was perceived as an objective transaction by the pioneers. b. JONES-WAGGONER AND JUSTIFICATION. The Jones and Waggoner focus upon the overwhelming dimensions of the law led to their conclusion that personal righteousness was inadequate both for the past and for the future. Only the righteousness of Christ satisfied the requirements of the law and such righteousness came through faith as a gift. In their scheme, however, Christ's righteousness actually replaced the past sins within the individual and became the instrument of obedience for the present and future.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Crisis
    America's Crisis BY URIAH SMITH INTERNATIONAL TRACT SOCIETY PACIFIC PRESS PUBLISHING CO 1895 3 THE Government of the United States of America is a subject of Bible prophecy. Why not? The chief theme of prophecy, next to the coming, work and second advent, of our Lord Jesus Christ, to set up His everlasting kingdom, is the story of the rise and fall of cities, nations and kingdoms on this earth. Why should not our own nation come into consideration as well as others? The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, Tyre and Sidon, Nineveh and Jerusalem, the kingdoms of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome, and the ten kingdoms which arose out of old Rome, all have had their place on the prophetic page. Their rise, history, decline, and fall, were all plainly foretold, and every prophetic utterance concerning them has thus far been fulfilled to the very letter. May we not, therefore, look for like particulars respecting a government so prominent and influential as our own? And if so, ought it not to be a theme of paramount interest to those who have the opportunity to become acquainted therewith? Scanning the field of prophecy, and noting the character of the nations which all agree are mentioned in the Bible, two reasons at once appear why they are thus made prominent in the prophetic page: First, if they have been 4 nations which have had a leading influence in the affairs of men; and, secondly, if they have been so closely connected with the people of God, and the great events in the development of the plan of man's redemption through Jesus Christ, that the history of the true church, and the Lord's work in the earth, could not be written without making mention of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth-Century Adventist Understanding of the Flood
    Avondale College ResearchOnline@Avondale Science and Mathematics Conference Papers School of Science and Mathematics 12-2017 Nineteenth-Century Adventist Understanding of the Flood Cornelis S. Bootsman Avondale College of Higher Education, [email protected] Lynden Rogers Avondale College of Higher Education, [email protected] Kevin C. de Berg Avondale College of Higher Education, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://research.avondale.edu.au/sci_math_conferences Part of the Religion Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Bootsman, C., Rogers, L., & de Berg, K. (2017). Nineteenth-century Adventist understanding of the flood. In L. Rogers (Ed.), The Biblical Flood: The Context and History of Seventh-day Adventist Understanding. Paper presented at Avondale College of Higher Education, Cooranbong, 9-10 September (pp. 61-94). Cooranbong, Australia: Avondale Academic Press. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Science and Mathematics at ResearchOnline@Avondale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Science and Mathematics Conference Papers by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@Avondale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 61 Chapter 3 Nineteenth-century Adventist Understanding of the Flood Cornelis Bootsman, Lynden J. Rogers, Kevin de Berg Introduction Undoubtedly the pioneer of nineteenth-century Adventist views on the nature of the Flood was Ellen G. White. However, other early Seventh-day Adventist thought-leaders also wrote on the Flood or on geological matters that affected their understanding of the Flood. In general they followed White’s schema. Of these others, Uriah Smith and Alonzo T.
    [Show full text]
  • Adventist Heritage Loma Linda University Publications
    Loma Linda University TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works Adventist Heritage Loma Linda University Publications Winter 1988 Adventist Heritage - Vol. 13, No. 1 Adventist Heritage, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/advent-heritage Part of the History Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Adventist Heritage, Inc., "Adventist Heritage - Vol. 13, No. 1" (1988). Adventist Heritage. http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/advent-heritage/24 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the Loma Linda University Publications at TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Adventist Heritage by an authorized administrator of TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONTENTS EDIT@R'S STUMP: 2 Ronald D. Graybill I FACES OF MINNEAPOLIS: 3 The City Welcomes Adventists in 1888 Ronald D. Graybill FACES AT MINNEAPOLIS: 12 Delegates at the 1888 Conference Beverly Herbrandson Koester WHAT DID E. J. WAGGONER SAY AT MINNEAPOLIS? 23 Clintbn Wahlen I BOOKMARKS: 37 "Re-examining the Myths of Millerism" Steve Daily I PHOTOS FROM THE WAGGONER FAMILY ALBUM 39 Jamek R. Nix I ADVENTIST HERITAGE is published by the Department of Archives and Special Collections with the jDepartment of History and the School of Religion, Lorna Linda University, Lorna Linda, CA 92350.Bulk postage rates paid at Lorna Linda, CA.Copyright 1988 by Lorna Linda University, Department of Archives and Special Collections, Lorna Linda, CA92350. I Subscripiion rates: $8.00 per year (additional postage outside U.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. an Approach on the Doctrine of the Trinity in Seventh-Day Adventist
    DavarLogos 2018 - Vol. XVII - N.º 2 Artículo 3. An Approach on the Doctrine of the Trinity in Seventh-day Adventist Theology and Roman Catholic Theology1 Un enfoque de la doctrina de la trinidad en la teología adventista del séptimo día y en la teología católica romana Agenilton Corrêa2 Abstract The study of the doctrine of God has been at the very center of Christian theology. This is one of the reasons why the Trinity has been, historically, the subject of some of Chris- tianity’s most intense and protracted theological controversies, even in the Seventh-day Adventist Church. For this reason, it has always been the most difficult doctrine to -un derstand in theological discussions. The current debate in Adventist circles involving the Adventist position on Trinity has gained more and more prominence and the current Adventist position on the Trinity has been questioned, because there is a difficulty in grasping the concept of God as a triune being. Some critics argue that, by adopting the Trinity, the Seventh-day Adventist Church has moved away from the position of the Sev- enth-day Adventist pioneers in the understanding of the nature of God and closeer to the Roman Catholic position. Thus, the main goal of this article is to present and analyze, in a systematic and comprehensive way, the Seventh-day Adventist position on the Trinity in light of the Roman Catholic theological position on its trinitarian dogma, in order to present the real Adventist theological approach on God. Keywords Trinity — Godhead — Adventist Theology — Catholic Theology 1 Article adapted from the doctoral dissertation entitled “A study of the doctrine of trinity in Seventh Adventist theology and Roman Catholic theology”.
    [Show full text]
  • Preach Christ! Columbia Pike, Silver Spring
    Ministry Ministry is the international journal of the Seventh-day Adventist Ministerial Association and has been published since 1928. Association Secretary International Advisors Salvation pilgrimage James A. Cress A. Abdulmajid, Eradio Alonso, The Adventist journey into justification by faith and Trinitarianism Editor Roberto Badenas, Alejandro Willmore D. Eva Bullon, Jaime Castrejon, Woodrow W. Whidden Eugene Hsu, Gabriel Maurer, Assistant Editor Leslie McMilian, Joel Julia W. Norcott Musvosvi, David Parks, Jose 8 Editorial Assistant Viana, Walton Whaley, John Sheila Draper Willmott, Eric Winter, R. A, Zeeman Small groups in evangelism Professional Growth and Small group ministries along with evangelism can create Inter-church Relations Pastoral Advisors Nikolaus Satelmajer Leslie Baumgartner, S. Peter more lasting results and more mature disciples Campbell, Michael Cerna, Contributing Editors Jeanne Hartwell, Mitchell John W. Fowler Sharon Cress Henson, Greg Nelson, Norma Rex D. Edwards Osborn, Leslie Pollard, Dan Joel Sarli Smith, Steve Willsey Kit Watts 10 Advertising Pastoral Assistant Editors Ministry Editorial Office When children are grieving John C. Cress Subscriptions and Circulation Ministry to children in grief Fredrick Russell Maylan Schurch Jeannette Calbi Norma Osborn Loren Seioold Resources Consulting Editors Catherine Payne Matthew Bediako, Ben Tape of the Month 14 Clausen, Raoul Dederen, Donald Driver Teofilo Ferreira, Ron Cover Design Growing churches is like growing trees Flowers, Robert Harry Knox Principles of church growth drawn from the natural world Folkenberg, John M. Fowler, Roland Hegstad, Cover Art Ricardo Norton Kathleen Kuntaraf, Robert Detail from "Christ of the Peach, George Reid, Angel Narrow Way," by Elfred Lee. Rodriguez, Penny Shell, Courtesy of the E. G. White William Shea, Russell Estate 16 Staples, Richard Tibbits, Waiting for the right moment Edward Zmke Wisely presenting the controversial aspects ofAdventism To Writers: We welcome unsolicited manuscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Adventist Interpretation of the "Daily" in the Book of Daniel from 1831 to 2008
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Master's Theses Graduate Research 2009 The History of the Adventist Interpretation of the "Daily" in the Book of Daniel from 1831 to 2008 Denis Kaiser Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses Recommended Citation Kaiser, Denis, "The History of the Adventist Interpretation of the "Daily" in the Book of Daniel from 1831 to 2008" (2009). Master's Theses. 45. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses/45 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT THE HISTORY OF THE ADVENTIST INTERPRETATION OF THE “DAILY” IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL FROM 1831 TO 2008 by Denis Kaiser Adviser: Denis Fortin ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Thesis Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE HISTORY OF THE ADVENTIST INTERPRETATION OF THE “DAILY” IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL FROM 1831 TO 2008 Name of the researcher: Denis Kaiser Name and degree of faculty adviser: Denis Fortin, Ph.D. Date completed: July 2009 During the more than 160 years since Adventism’s inception, the interpretation of the WƗPîd or “daily” in the book of Daniel underwent several changes with respect to the identification of the term itself, the employed methodology, and the style of argumentation, as well as the way differing views are handled. This study analyzes various Millerite and Adventist interpretations of the WƗPîd in Dan 8 between 1831 and 2008, focusing especially on the approach to the biblical text, the argumentation, and the atmosphere during the time of conflict (1900 – 1930), as well as on Ellen White’s counsels during that period, her puzzling statement, and possible explanations.
    [Show full text]