DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of the River Basin Management Plan for Kura Upstream Mingachevir Dam River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of the River Basin Management Plan for Kura Upstream Mingachevir Dam River Basin European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Result 3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR KURA UPSTREAM MINGACHEVIR DAM RIVER BASIN CONSULTATION ON THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES REPORT & QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS Version 1, 01July 2020 Beneficiaries Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Azerbaijan Republic Responsible EU member state consortium EUWI+ project leader Alexander Zinke, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Azerbaijan Rafig Verdiyev; Responsible international thematic lead expert Yunona Videnina, International Office for Water Chloé Déchelette, International Office for Water Responsible thematic lead expert Farda Imanov Jeyhune Mammadova Fuad Mammadov Gulnar Aliyeva Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Organisation for Eco- nomic Co-operation and Development (OECD), both responsible for the implementation of Result 1, and an EU member states consortium comprising the Environment Agency Austria (UBA, Austria), the lead coordinator, and the International Office for Water (OiEau, France), both responsible for the implementation of Results 2 and 3. The project is co-funded by Austria and France through the Austrian Development Agency and the French Artois-Picardie Water Agency. This document, the “REPORT: PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS (MAIN ISSUES AND PROGRAMME OF MEASURES) FOR THE DRAFT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN OF KURA UPSTREAM MINGACHEVIR DAM RIVER BASIN”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Euro- pean Union or the governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. Imprint Owner and Editor: EU Member State Consortium Umweltbundesamt GmbH Office International de l’Eau (OiEau) Spittelauer Lände 5 21/23 rue de Madrid 1090 Vienna, Austria 75008 Paris, France Responsible OiEau Communication officers: Ms Yunona Videnina [email protected] Ms Chloé Déchelette [email protected] July,2020 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 6 2. CONTEXT FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION IN AZERBAIJAN ........................................................... 8 3. CONSULTATION ON MAIN ISSUES (2019) ...................................................................................... 9 3.1. Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Participants .................................................................................................................................. 9 3.3. Summary of the meeting ............................................................................................................. 9 3.4. Assessment of the meeting ....................................................................................................... 10 4. PUBLIC INFORMATION CAMPAIGN ON WATER ISSUES (2019) ................................................. 12 4.1 Context and objectives ............................................................................................................... 12 4.2. Three awareness raising events targeted at young people ...................................................... 12 5. CONSULTATION ON THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES (2020) ................................................ 16 5.1. Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 16 5.2. Main results of the 2020 consultation process .......................................................................... 16 Consultation meetings from 10 to 19 June ............................................................................... 16 Online consultation ................................................................................................................... 17 5.3. Stakeholder meeting 1(Mingachevir) ........................................................................................ 18 5.4. Stakeholder meeting 2 (Sheki) .................................................................................................. 19 5.5 Stakeholder meeting 3 (Gakh) ................................................................................................... 21 5.6 Stakeholder meeting 4 (Zagatala) .............................................................................................. 22 5.7. Stakeholder meeting 5 (Balakan) .............................................................................................. 24 5.8. Stakeholder meeting 6 (Ganja) ................................................................................................. 26 5.9. Stakeholder meeting 7 (Goygol) ............................................................................................... 27 5.10. Stakeholder meeting 8 (Gadabay and Govlar)........................................................................ 28 5.11. Stakeholder meeting 9 (Shamkir) ............................................................................................ 31 5.11. Stakeholder meeting 10 (Tovuz) ............................................................................................. 32 5.12. Stakeholder meeting 11 (Gazakh) .......................................................................................... 33 5.12. Stakeholder meeting 12 (Agstafa) ........................................................................................... 35 5.14 Questionnaire analysis ............................................................................................................. 37 6. LESSONS LEARNT .......................................................................................................................... 40 7. ANNEXES ......................................................................................................................................... 41 Annex 7.1. List of Participants of Public consultation meetings ...................................................... 41 Annex 7.2. Table of comments of stakeholders ............................................................................... 56 Annex 7.3. Analyse of questionnaires .............................................................................................. 66 8. APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................... 75 8.1: Thematic Summary for the consultation on draft RBMP programme of measures .................. 75 8. 2.Questionnaire for the consultation on the programme of measures ......................................... 75 8. 3. Consultation report on RBMP main issues, meeting in Ganja 31 January 2019 ..................... 75 Abbreviations ADA ...................... Austrian Development Agency DoA ....................... Description of Action DG NEAR ............. Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations of the European Commission EaP ....................... Eastern Partnership EC ......................... European Commission EECCA ................. Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia EMBLAS ............... Environmental Monitoring in the Black Sea EPIRB ................... Environmental Protection of International River Basins ESCS .................... Ecological Status Classification Systems EU ......................... European Union EU-MS .................. EU-Member States EUWI+ .................. European Union Water Initiative Plus FD ......................... Floods Directive GEF ...................... Global Environmental Fund ICPDR ................... International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River INBO ..................... International Network of Basin Organisations IOWater/OIEau .... International Office for Water, France IWRM .................... Integrated Water Resources Management MSFD .................... Marine Strategy Framework Directive NESB .................... National Executive Steering Board NFP ....................... National Focal Point NGOs .................... Non-Governmental Organisations NPD ...................... National Policy Dialogue OECD ................... Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development RBC ...................... River Basin Council RBD ...................... River Basin District RB………………… River basin RBMP ................... River Basin Management Plan RBO ...................... River Basin Organisation ROM ..................... Result Oriented Monitoring SCM ...................... Steering Committee Meeting (of the EU Action EUWI+) SEIS ..................... Shared environmental information system TA ......................... Technical Assistance ToR ....................... Terms of References UBA ...................... Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Environment Agency Austria UNDP .................... United Nations Development Programme UNECE ................. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe WISE ..................... Water Information System
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Caucasus Region Transboundary Report Card
    The central Kura River basin is a large river basin in the mountainous South Caucasus region of Eurasia. It contains important water resources for three countries— Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan—and has a combined population of some 17 million people. There are many threats to these shared water resources, including nutrient inputs, heavy metal pollution, and sediment erosion. Successful management of these shared resources is critical to the social, economic, and ecological prosperity of the region. This newsletter details the first attempt at an integrated water quality report card for the central Kura River basin. Threats to the central Kura River water resources have changed effective science communication to a broad audience, from scientists considerably from the time when the region was part of the former to managers and the public. In the long term, such a trilateral synthesis Soviet Union until the present (including some improvements such as for the central Kura River basin could be expanded and assist in linking reduced toxicant inputs with the closure of factories). However, even water quality monitoring programs throughout the entire basin and though many monitoring efforts have been and are being undertaken, provide a mechanism to allow this information to be better utilized for a clear synthesis of the water quality throughout the basin within all regional management of the water resources. The style of a ‘report card’ three countries has yet to be developed. One approach towards reaching synthesis also allows for easy interpretation of key messages by a broad this goal is the development of a geographically explicit water quality audience and as such will assist in widely communicating these results report card, which can act as a focus for geographic and temporal to strengthen the engagement in stewardship of these valuable water syntheses of water quality data.
    [Show full text]
  • South Caucasus Gas Pipeline. ESIA for Azerbaijan. Technical and Baseline Appendices
    SCP ESIA AZERBAIJAN DRAFT FOR DISCLOSURE ECOLOGICAL BASELINE REPORT 1 Ecology ............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 1.2 Methodology .............................................................................................................1 1.2.1 Species status and occurrence..............................................................................4 1.3 Overview of Flora and Fauna in Azerbaijan.................................................................4 1.4 Protected Areas .........................................................................................................1 1.5 Habitats and Vegetation .............................................................................................4 1.5.1 Desert and semi-desert........................................................................................5 1.5.2 Wetlands............................................................................................................8 1.5.3 Woodlands and scrub........................................................................................10 1.5.4 Protected plant species......................................................................................11 1.6 Fauna......................................................................................................................12 1.6.1 General............................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposal
    Annex 5 UNDP GEF Kura Project “Advancing Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) across the Kura river basin through implementation of the transboundary agreed actions and national plans” Eighteen-month monitoring plan for the ecological assessment in the Kura River basin March 2018 Abbreviations and acronyms AWB Artificial Water Body EPIRB Environmental Protection of International River Basins project RBMP River Basin Management Plan (of the Water Framework Directive) QE Quality Elements (for the classification of water bodies) WB Water Body WFD Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC) 2 Table of contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The pilot catchments ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.1. Aragvi (Georgia) ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Shamkirchay (Azerbaijan) .................................................................................................................. 8 2.3. Alijanchay (Azerbaijan) .................................................................................................................... 12 3. Monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Indicators of Azerbaijan";  "Azerbaijan-Russia" (2013)
    THE STATE STATISTICAL COMMITTEE OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN WATER STATISTICS IN THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN Rena Lazimova Head of Environment, Forestry and Fishery Section Baku, 25-27 June 2014 1 WATER RESOURCES OF AZERBAIJAN 2 WATER RESOURCES OF AZERBAIJAN Water resources of Azerbaijan consist of surface and groundwater. 3 Surface water resources are 32 billion m , in dry years their volume is reduced to 23 billion m3. Surface water resources are rivers, lakes, reservoirs, glaciers and sea water. 70% of the total water resources is formed on the territory of neighboring states. The main sources of surface water are rivers and reservoirs. The river network of the country consists of more than 8350 rivers. Despite the fact that the rivers of the Republic of Azerbaijan are included in the Caspian Sea basin, they are divided into three separate basins of water: - the basin of the Kura River - the basin of the Araz River (left tributaries) - rivers that directly flow into the Caspian Sea 80% of the country's water resources is the water basin of the Kura River (1515 km) and its tributaries. The second largest waterway of Azerbaijan is the Araz River. 3 MAIN RESERVOIRS Republic has 135 reservoirs, with the total volume 21,5 km3. Largest reservoirs: Mingachevir reservoir, volume 15,7 km3 3 Shamkir reservoir, volume 2,7 km 3 Araz reservoir, volume 1,3 km 3 Sarsang reservoir, volume 0,6 km – is under occupation 4 LEGAL BASIS OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS ACTIVITIES The Constitution of Azerbaijan, Article 94; Law on “Official Statistics” (18.02.1994, last amended on 15.11.2011); The Regulation on the SSC of the Republic of Azerbaijan.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment South Caucasus Gas Pipeline Azerbaijan
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT South Caucasus Gas Pipeline Azerbaijan Prepared for BP By AETC Ltd / ERM May 2002 SCP ESIA AZERBAIJAN DRAFT FOR DISCLOSURE GENERAL NOTES Project No: P8078 Title: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment South Caucasus Gas Pipeline Azerbaijan Client: BP Issue Date: May 2002 Issuing Office: Helsby Authorised by: Project Manager Date: Authorised by: Project QA Rep Date: AETC has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement under which this work was completed. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express agreement of the client, AETC and ERM. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made as to the professional advice included in this report. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by AETC for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations I this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. No part of this report may be copied or duplicated without the express permission of the client and AETC and ERM and the party for whom it was prepared. Where field investigations have been carried out these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with the Quality Management System of AETC.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Caucasus.Pdf
    THE CAUCASUS The Caucasus is one of the most complicated regions in the world: with many dif- ferent peoples and political units, differing religious allegiances, frequent conflicts, and where historically major world powers have clashed with each other on many occasions. Until now there has been no comprehensive introductory book for those wishing to learn about this complex region. This book fills the gap, providing a clear, comprehensive introduction to the Caucasus, which is suitable for all readers. It covers the geography; the historical development of the region; economics; poli- tics and government; population; religion and society; culture and traditions; along- side its conflicts and international relations. Written throughout in an accessible style, it requires no prior knowledge of the Caucasus. The book will be invaluable for those researching specific issues, as well as for readers needing a thorough introduction to the region. Frederik Coene is currently Attaché dealing with post-conflict assistance in the Delegation of the European Commission to Georgia. His research on the Caucasus began in 1999 during his internship in the Private Office of the Secretary-General at NATO Headquarters. Since then he has researched, worked and travelled in all parts of the Caucasus. ROUTLEDGE CONTEMPORARY RUSSIA AND EASTERN EUROPE SERIES 1 LIBERAL NATIONALISM IN CENTRAL EUROPE Stefan Auer 2 CIVIL–MILITARY RELATIONS IN RUSSIA AND EASTERN EUROPE David J. Betz 3 THE EXTREME NATIONALIST THREAT IN RUSSIA The growing influence of Western rightist
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report: Delineation And
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+): Results 2 and 3 ENI/2016/372-403 TECHNICAL REPORT: DELINEATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SURFACE WATER BODIES AND DESIGN OF A SURFACE MONITORING NETWORK FOR THE KURA UPSTREAM OF THE MINGACHEVIR DAM RIVER BASIN DISTRICT IN AZERBAIJAN Final Version. EUWI-EAST-AZ-05; December 2019 Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Alexander Zinke, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Azerbaijan Rafig Verdiyev (AZ) Responsible international thematic lead expert Alexander Zinke, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Georg Wolfram, independent consultant, DWS (AT) Responsible Azerbaijani thematic lead expert Vafadar Ismaylov (AZ) Authors Vafadar Ismaylov, Period LLC Ramil Ibrahimov, Period LLC Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Drainage Basin of the Caspian Sea
    131 CHAPTER 4 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE CASPIAN SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwaters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Caspian Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Caspian Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Ural/Zaiyk Caspian Sea KZ, RU South-Pred-Ural, Pre-Caspian, Syrt (KZ, RU) Atrek/Atrak Caspian Sea IR, TM Gomishan Lagoon (IR, TM) Kura Caspian Sea AM, AZ, GE, IR, TR Lake Jandari,Lake Kura (AZ, GE) Wetlands of Javakheti Region Kartsakhi/Aktaş Gölü – Iori/Gabirri Kura AZ, GE Iori/Gabirri (AZ, GE) – Alazani/Ganyh Kura AZ, GE Alazan-Agrichay (AZ, GE) – Agstev/Agstafachai Kura AM, AZ Agstev-Akstafa/Tavush-Tovuz (AM, AZ) – Potskhovi/Posof Kura GE, TR – Ktsia-Khrami Kura AM, AZ, GE Ktsia-Khrami (AZ, GE) – –Debed/Debeda Ktsia-Khrami AM, GE Debed (AM, GE) – Aras/Araks Kura AM, AZ, IR, TR Araks Govsaghynyn Nakhichevan/Larijan and Djebrail Flood-plain marshes and fishponds Reservoir (AZ, IR) in the Araks/Aras River valley (AM, AZ, IR, TR) – – Akhuryan/Arpaçay Aras/Araks AM, TR Akhuryan/Arpaçay Leninak-Shiraks (AM, TR) Reservoir – –Arpa Aras/Araks AM, AZ Herher, Malishkin and Jermuk (AM, AZ) – –Vorotan/Bargushad Aras/Araks AM, AZ Vorotan-Akora (AM, AZ) – –Voghji/Ohchu Aras/Araks AM, AZ – –Sarisu/Sari Su Aras/Araks TR, IR Astarachay Caspian Sea AZ, IR Samur
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis – Update 2013
    TRANSBOUNDARY DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS – UPDATE 2013 UNDP/GEF Project Reducing Transboundary Degradation in the Kura-Ara(k)s River Basin September 2013 – Baku/ Tbilisi/Yerevan www.kura-aras.org UNDP/GEF PROJECT REDUCING TRANSBOUNDARY DEGRADATION IN THE KURA ARA(K)S RIVER BASIN UPDATED TRANSBOUNDARY DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS Tbilisi, Georgia – Baku, Azerbaijan – Yerevan, Armenia September 2013 2013 UPDATED TRANSBOUNDARY DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS FOR THE KURA RIVER BASIN The Updated Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA) for the Kura1 River Basin focuses on priority environmental issues that are transboundary in nature. The preparation of the Updated TDA involved the assessment of the environmental and socio-economic impacts of transboundary issues, and the identification of institutional, legal and policy issues that need to be addressed. Information presented in the Updated TDA is obtained from publicly accessible sources – publications, statistical services, as well as from national experts in the project countries. While the Kura Ara(k)s river basin also includes Turkey and the Islamic Republic of Iran, the TDA does not provide information on these countries, as they do not participate in the UNDP/GEF Kura Ara(k)s project, under the guidance of which this TDA is prepared. A comprehensive analysis of transboundary issues provides a factual basis to formulate recommended options for improving the environmental situation and ensuring the sustainable development of the Kura Ara(k)s River Basin. The Updated TDA was produced on the basis of comprehensive studies of the physical and geographical features, water uses, and the socio-economic and environmental situation in the Kura Ara(k)s River Basin with respect to three of the five riparian countries – Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Deformation of the Kura Fold-Thrust Belt, Southern Greater Caucasus
    Late Cenozoic deformation of the Kura fold-thrust belt, southern Greater Caucasus A.M. Forte1,†, E. Cowgill1, T. Bernardin2, O. Kreylos2, and B. Hamann2 1Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA 2Institute of Data Analysis and Visualization, Department of Computer Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA ABSTRACT systematic along-strike variations result Himalayan belt that extends over 2500 km along from a west-to-east decrease in total short- strike. Estimates for the timing of collision be- Although the geometry and kinematics of ening within the Kura fold-thrust belt. We tween Arabia and Eurasia are poorly constrained the fi rst-order structures accommodating interpret this variable shortening to stem and include early Paleocene (Berberian and Arabia-Eurasia convergence are relatively from eastward propagation of the Kura fold- King, 1981), Eocene (Hempton, 1987), early well known in Turkey and Iran, major short- thrust belt. Comparison of our preliminary Miocene (Robertson, 2000), mid-Miocene ening structures remain poorly understood total shortening estimates with those pre- (Dewey et al., 1986), late Miocene (McQuarrie within the central portion of the collision dicted by current plate motions suggest that et al., 2003), and early Pliocene (Philip et al., zone, in eastern Anatolia and the Caucasus. the Kura fold-thrust belt has accommodated 1989). Increasingly it has been recognized that New remotely sensed neotectonic mapping, ~30%–40% (~25 km) of total Arabia-Eurasia the wide variation in reported ages of collision synthesis of regional geologic and strati- convergence since 5 Ma, and thus forms a may result from both diachronous timing of graphic data, and balanced cross sections fi rst-order structural system within the cen- collision along strike and numerous small col- suggest that the Kura fold-thrust belt has ac- tral portion of the collision zone.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT Sedimentation of the Kura River in the South Caucasus
    Water Management in the South Caucasus USAID Contract No. OUT-LAG-I-804-99-00017-00 FINAL REPORT Sedimentation of the Kura River In the South Caucasus Prepared for: U.S. Agency for International Development Mission for the South Caucasus Prepared by: Development Alternatives, Inc. Tblisi, Georgia October 2002 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 83 Water Management in the South Caucasus November 9, 2002 Mr. Peter Argo Director Office of Energy & Environment U.S. Agency for International Development 20 Telavi Street, 5th Floor Tblisi 380003 Georgia Final Report Sedimentation of the Kura River Dear Mr. Argo, We are pleased to provide the USAID Caucasus Mission with the attached report titled Final Report on “Sedimentation of the Kura River in the South Caucasus ” for the project activities conducted to date in as part of the Water Management in the South Caucasus Project. This report is part of a series of activities for Water Resource Management in the Kura-Aras River Basin that address technical and related policy and institutional conditions and experiences relevant to achieving the objectives of the Project. This report summarizes some of the tasks completed as part of the Activity 1, Monitor Water Quantity and Quality in the Kura-Aras Basin. This report was prepared by the Dr. Gregory L. Morris with the cooperation of the Hydrometeorological Services in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. This report is intended to be a focal point of discussions with the Hydrometeorological Services in each country to increase the dialogue for sustainable water management in the South Caucasus. The report provides detailed recommendations that will be considered for implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Quality of the Irrigation Canals in Azerbaijan
    Science Review ISSN 2544-9346 AGRICULTURE STUDY OF QUALITY OF THE IRRIGATION CANALS IN AZERBAIJAN Saida Aliyeva, Nariman Ismayilov, Microbiology Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan, Baku, Azerbaijan DOI: https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_sr/28022019/6364 ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received 17 December 2018 The waters of the Kura River and the irrigation canals are phytotoxic and Accepted 23 February 2019 reduce the percentage of germination of cress-salad and barley seeds in Published 28 February 2019 comparison with pure water by 10-12%. After cleaning them on adsorbents, waters lose the phytotoxicity properties. This makes it necessary to solve the KEYWORDS problems of cleaning irrigation waters from organic and inorganic pollutants in order to achieve sustainable development of agriculture in the country. river waters; irrigation canals; soil pollution; phytotoxicity of waters and soils; purification. Citation: Saida Aliyeva, Nariman Ismayilov. (2019) Study of Quality of the Irrigation Canals in Azerbaijan. Science Review. 2(19). doi: 10.31435/rsglobal_sr/28022019/6364 Copyright: © 2019 Saida Aliyeva, Nariman Ismayilov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Introduction. Due to the favorable climate and soils, Azerbaijan has a comparative advantage in the agricultural sector. However, irrigation is important component for the cost-effective agricultural production.
    [Show full text]