DOCSLIB.ORG

Ρ Ο Ε M S. Jd with Elegies on the Authors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ρ Ο Ε M S. Jd with Elegies on the Authors PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/148221 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-10 and may be subject to change. ^rans Kellendonk John & Richard Marriott The History of a Seventeenth-Century Publishing House Promotor: Prof. T.A. Birrell Copyright с 1978 Ъу Frana Kellendonk, Amsterdam Deze uitgave kwam tot stand in samenwerking met Polak & Van Gennep Uitgeversmaatschappij B.V. , Amsterdam. ISBN 90 253 5535 Table of contents p. ν Introduction ix Abbreviations χ List of illustrations 3 I. John and Richard Marriott. Their lives and ca­ reers 19 II. Relations with authors 21 In partnership vith Gnsmand. George Wither, Mi­ chael Drayton, Mary Wroth. 27 Francis Quarles 31 The works of John Donne 46 Izaak Walton 67 Conclusion 69 Notes 75 III. A chronological list of books, published by John, Richard, and George Marriott 195 IV. Entries and assignments to John and Richard Marriott, not dealt with in the previous list 212 Indexes to parts III and IV 215 Bibliography 220 General index iii Introduction In his Life of John Milton David Masson devoted a few pages to the London booksellers and publishers of Milton's time, in which he remarked: 'All in all, the chiefs of the London book-trade, in poetry a.nd whatever the phrase "the finer literature" can include, had been Humphrey Moseley, Richard Marriott, and Henry Herringman. But of these three chiefs one was still the chief. Marriott and Herringman would have knelt to Humphrey Moseley' (VI, 400). Since then articles have been written about Moseley by John Curtis Reed and about Herringman by Clarence William Miller (see my Biblio­ graphy), but Richard Marriott has remained unstudied, and so has his father, John Marriott, who is of equal importance, but is not mentioned by Masson because the main part of his career was before Milton's time. In the following pages I hope to do justice to these stationers, who published some of the best literature of their age, among which the works of John Donne, of Francis Quarles, the first part of Samuel Butler's Hudibras, and Izaak Walton's Lives and Compleat Angler. It is common knowledge by now that the changing economic conditions of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries affected literature profoundly. The spread of wealth and the increase of literacy created a new middle-class reading public with its own tastes and interests, and owing to the decline of patronage authors gradually diverted their attention from the aristocracy to this new public. In the seventeenth century print began to lose its stigma and authors began· to look upon the press as a le­ gitimate means of supplementing their income, especially after the publishing boom of I64O-6O, whereas before then a literary profession had only been possible in the theatre and poetry was written by amateurs and circulated in manuscript as a rule. In this period the modern man-of-letters came into being. At the same time publishers began to specialize in belles lettres, and Moseley, the Marriotts, and Herringman were publishers with a marked interest in literature, even though they continued to issue books in other fields, especially theology. The consequen- r cea of this development were far-reaching and would eventually prepare the way for the novel. Publishers who, to cull a phrase from Q.D. Leavis's Fiction and the Reading Public, are the middle­ men between the writer and his audience, performed an essential part m this development and therefore literary scholarship should not pass them by. Until now no full study of publishing in the seventeenth century has appeared. H.G. Aldis, Cyprian Blagden, H.S. Bennett, P.M. Handover, F.A. Mumby, Marjory Plant, ana J.W. Saunaers all devote invaluable chapters to this period, but what their books provide are either sweeping surveys or accounts which, owing to the bias of their subjects, touch only laterally on the history of pu­ blishing at that time. Nor will such a full study be possible until at least the more important of seventeenth-century statio­ ners will have been dealt with in detail. This study has no loftier pretention than to be a systematic presentation of all the facts concerning John and Richard Marriott and their publications that I have been able to gather. The mam text of this thesis treats first the lives and careers of John and Richard Marriott, which have been reconstructed with the aid of manuscript materials from Stationers' Hall, the Guildhall Library, and the Public Record Office, and secondly their publi­ shing policy, which I have investigated by concentrating on their relations with authors and by devoting separate sections to the publication of works by John Donne, Francis Quarles and Izaak Walton. I am, of course, heavily indebted to previous research on these authors, due acknowledgement of which is made in my notes and Bibliography. Especially David Novarr's The Making of Walton's Lives has proved a rich mine of information. In the 'Chronological List of Books, Published by John and Richard Marriott', which tells the history of the Marriott firm in the fullest possible detail, the items have been arranged chronolo­ gically and, within each year, alphabetically. I have transcribed the title-pages in quasi-facsimile. Italics have been indicated by underlining, the use of red ink by dotted underlining. Mottoes and extended decnptions of contents have been omitted from the transcriptions for the sake of brevity. Author names that do not vi appear on the title-pagea have been supplied between square brae-. keta; author names that can be proved to be incorrect have been put between quotation marks. The descriptions of the title-pages are followeo by a short collation formula, the entry from the Stationers' Registers, a note indicating the libraries where I bave examined copies and, where possible, by the date on which George Thomason purchased the book and the advertisement from the Term Catalogues. Any additional information -e.g. on printers, engravings, variants- is given m the annotations, which also copy the publisher's prefaces ard contain accounts of the book's publication, if available, and if not dealt with in the main text. Each item has been numbered and the numbers of previous and later issues and editions are supplied between brackets. For the compi­ lation of this list I have used the copies in the British Library, the Bodleian Library, and Cambridge University Library. Of books of which no copies were to be found in these libraries I have tried to obtain microfilms. In a few cases I have not succeeded and there I have copied descriptions from whatever catalogues and bibliographies were available. The list of 'Entries and Assignments' contains extracts from the Registers of the Stationers' Company which could not conveniently be dealt with in the previous list. Assignments of batches of books have been listed and also assignments of titles that do not appear to have been published above the Marriott imprint, either because the transfer was not only a transfer of copyright, but also of stock and further editions were deemed unnecessary, or because the transferred title was published above another statio­ ner's imprint. Entries for new titles that were not published above the Marriott imprint must be interpreted as concerning books that either were published for another bookseller, or were not published at all, which is what the annotation 'not traced' must be taken to mean, unless it is assumed that all copies of such a book have been lost. The arrangement is again chronologi­ cal and the items have been numbered in italics, so as to distin­ guish them from the numbers in the previous list. Both lists have been indexed on authors, printers, partners, and engravers. Throughout this thesis I have expanded contractions and abbrevi­ vi! ations in quotations from seventeenth-century sources which might not be immediately understandabxe, and I have assumed the year to begin on 1 January. This thesis could not have been undertaken, let alone completed, without the aid and encouragement of others. At various stages of its composition I have had the honour to profit by the knowledge of Messrs. I.A. Shapiro and R.L. Smallwood of the Shakespeare Institute, Birmingham, and of Mr. H.M. Nixon, Keeper of the Muni­ ment Room and Library in Westminster Abbey. Thanks are also due to Mrs. Miriam Foot-Romme, who allowed me to consult the type­ script of NSTC in the British Library, and to Miss N. Carol Evans, who kindly invited me to avail myself of her corrections to Wing. A grant from the British Council has enabled me to do my research in England. I am very much obliged to the staff members of the libraries where I have worked, who patiently and without questio­ ning heaped pile after pile of books on my desk. I also thank the editors of Neophilologus for their permission to reproduce sub­ stantial parts of my article 'Izaak Walton and Sir Henry Wotton's Panegyriek of King Charles'. The publication of this book would have been much more difficult without the aid of Messrs. Johan Polak and Ben Hosman. Finally I must express my gratitude to all those colleagues, friends and relatives, whose constant enquiries after the progress of this thesis shamed me into finishing it. viii Abbreviations anr. - arother Butt - John Butt, 'A Bibliography of Izaak Walton's Lives', Oxford Bnblicgraphical Society. Proceecings and Papers, vol. II.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to the 1645 Volume: Poems of Mr. John Milton
    C01.qxd 8/18/08 14:44 Page 1 Introduction to the 1645 Volume: Poems of Mr. John Milton In 1645, Milton published most but not all of the poems he had composed by that date. The publisher Humphrey Moseley had been bringing out volumes of lyric poetry by royalist poets such as Edmund Waller, and it was likely, as he claims in the intro- duction to the volume, that he approached Milton and encouraged him to publish his verse. Moseley also arranged for the engraved portrait of Milton by William Marshall (see Figure 1), beneath which Milton, who considered the engraving unflattering, placed a witty Greek epigram ridiculing it in a language neither Marshall nor Moseley under- stood. Unlike most contemporary poets, Milton neither wrote a preface, solicited commendatory poems, nor acknowledged a patron. He organized his volume more or less chronologically, thus displaying his poetic development, but also carefully grouped together poems of similar themes and genres. With the Latin tag from Virgil’s Eclogues on the title page (“Baccare frontem / Cingite, ne vati noceat mala lingua futuro” – “Bind my forehead with foxglove, lest evil tongues harm the future Bard”), he promises future poems on even greater themes. In the Latin ode sent with a replacement copy of the volume to John Rouse, librar- ian of the Bodleian Library at Oxford, Milton describes the 1645 volume as a “twin book, rejoicing in a single cover, but with a double title page.” The first section of the volume presents his vernacular poems (mostly in English, but also including a mini-sonnet sequence in Italian), and concludes with A MASK Presented At LUDLOW- Castle.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ben Jonson and Shakespeare (1921)
    Greenwood - Ben Jonson and Shakespeare 61 From Ben Jonson and Shakespeare (1921) Sir George Greenwood HE sheet anchor of the traditional belief with regard to the authorship of t he plays and poems of Shakespeare is undoubtedly Ben Jonson. It is to the Jonsonian utterances that the apostles of the Stratfordian faith always makeT their appeal. That faith we are told is based on the “irrefragable rock” of Ben Jonson’s testimony. Well, it was not so very long ago that we used to be told that the truth of a universal deluge and the preservation of mankind and animals of every kind and species, in Noah’s Ark, was established on the “impregnable rock” of Holy Scripture, and yet to-day we find even high Church digni taries—with whom Mr. J. M. Robertson would certainly be in entire agreement here—disavowing any belief in this interesting mythological tradition. Is it not, then, possible that the Jonsonian testi mony may prove no more “irrefragable” or “impregnable” than that of those old chronicles, which age-long tradition has ascribed to the authorship of “Moses”? As a distinguished writer, well-known both in the political and the literary world, has written to me, the difficulties in the way of the orthodox “Shakespearian” belief seem to be insuperable. Are the Jonsonian utterances of such weight as to outweigh them all? I reply, put Jonson in one scale and all the difficulties and improbabilities — if not impossibilities — of the “Stratfordian” hypothesis in the other, and old Ben will kick the beam. Now let us briefly consider this Jonsonian testimony.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Tew Circle, 1630-1639
    Athens Journal of History XY The Great Tew Circle, 1630-1639 By Michael J. Langford The Great Tew Circle comprised a group of theologians, philosophers and poets who met regularly in Lord Falkland's house at Great Tew, near Oxford, from the early 1630s until around 1639. Although strongly royalist and Anglican, on many matters, especially that of toleration, they defended views that would later be classed as liberal.1 This article introduces the reader to the Great Tew Circle, and explores its relationship with the better- known Cambridge Platonists, most of whom flourished a few decades later. Common ground included the influence of Plato and an appeal to 'reason', although exactly how reason should to be understood raises interesting issues. Introduction The Great Tew Circle comprised a collection of theologians, philosophers and poets who met together in Lord Falkland's house at Great Tew, about sixteen miles from Oxford, from the early 1630s until around 1639 when rumbles of the civil war – which broke out in 1642 -- summoned Falkland to matters of state, and the group discussions were discontinued. Thereafter, despite the deaths of Falkland and Chillingworth, the Circle maintained some influence and a degree of association between many of its members remained, in part through the continued patronage of Falkland's widow. At first sight, the Restoration of Charles II in 1660 might seem to mark a kind of success for the aspirations of the Circle, and particularly for the efforts of Henry Hammond during the Commonwealth period, but although the return to monarchy and state Anglicanism did represent some aspects of the Circle's agenda, the generally narrow and intolerant agenda of the new order certainly did not.
    [Show full text]
  • WRAP Theses Crowther 2017.Pdf
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/ 97559 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications James Shirley and the Restoration Stage By Stefania Crowther A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Renaissance Studies University of Warwick, Centre for Renaissance Studies June 2017 2 3 Acknowledgements This thesis was supported by the James Shirley Complete Works Project, and funded by the AHRC, and Centre for Renaissance Studies, University of Warwick. I would like to thank these organisations, and in particular Jayne Browne, Ingrid de Smett, David Lines, Jayne Brown, Heather Pilbin, Paul Botley, and especially Elizabeth Clarke and Paul Prescott for their very helpful guidance during the upgrade process. Special thanks are due to Hannah Davis, whose URSS project on Restoration Shirley, supervised by Teresa Grant, provided the starting point for this thesis. I am also enormously grateful to the colleagues, friends and tutors who have inspired and supported my work: Daniel Ashman, Thomasin Bailey, Stephen Clucas, Michael Dobson, Peter Foreshaw, Douglas Hawes, Simon Jackson, Victoria Jones, Griff Jameson, Peter Kirwan, Chris Main, Gerry McAlpine, Zois Pigadas, Catherine Smith, Lee White, Susan Wiseman.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH RENAISSANCE EPITHALAMIA Approvedi Major Professor
    ENGLISH RENAISSANCE EPITHALAMIA APPROVEDi Major Professor : ~ Director of the ^Department of English si Deaf of the Graduate School \ ENGLISH RENAISSANCE EPJTHALAMIA THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Larry B. Corse, M. M, Denton, Texas August, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter I, THE CLASSICAL BACKGROUND 1 II. SIR PHILIP SIDNEY. 20 III. EDMUND SPENSER 31 IV. JOHN DONNE 48 V. BEN JONS ON AND ROBERT HERRICK. 78 VI. CONCLUSIONS 90 APPENDIX 97 BIBLIOGRAPHY ...... 108 ill CHAPTER I THE CLASSICAL BACKGROUND In the late sixteenth century, the classical genre of marriage songs called epithalamia-'- appeared In England. A few fine poems in this tradition were written by some of the major English poets: Sidney, Spenser, Donne, Jonson, and Herrick. The genre was important for only three decades in England before it fell into the hands of minor poets and literary hacks. When the English Renaissance poets took up the epithalamic genre, it had a two-thousand year old tradition behind it, a tradition which began in Greece, flourished for a time in Rome, then disappeared until the Renaissance, when epithalamla were written in Italian, French, Spanish, Latin, and English poetry. After the Renaissance, the classical tradition lost its influence on English epithalamia, and not until the twentieth century have major English poets written marriage songs patterned on the classical models. ^To avoid confusion which might arise from the several forms of this word ending in -urn, -a, -ie, -ies, -on, and -ons, the Latin forms, epithalamium and epithalamla, will be used throughout this thesis except in quotations and titles where the original spelling will be raaintained.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| Ben Jonson 1St Edition
    BEN JONSON 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE John Palmer | 9781315302188 | | | | | Ben Jonson folios The playbook itself is a mixture of halfsheets folded and gathered into quarto format, supplemented by a handful of full sheets also gathered in quarto and used for the final quires. Robert Allott contracted John Benson to print the first three plays of an intended second Ben Jonson 1st edition volume of Jonson's collected works, including Bartholomew Fair never registered ; The Staple of News entered to John Waterson 14 AprilArber 4. Views Read Edit View history. He reinstated the coda in F1. Occasional mispagination, as issued, text complete. See Lockwood, Shipping and insurance charges are additional. Gants and Tom Lockwood When Ben Jonson first emerged as a playwright at the end of Elizabeth's reign, the English printing and bookselling trade that would preserve his texts for posterity was still a relatively small industry. Markings on first page and title page. Each volume in the series, initially under the direction of Willy Bang and later Henry De Vocht, sought to explore how compositors and correctors shaped the work, and included extensive analyses of the press variants between individual copies of a playbook as well as Ben Jonson 1st edition variants between editions. More information about this seller Contact this seller 1. Seemingly unhindered by concerns over time or space or materials, the Oxford editors included along with the texts a Jonson biography summing up all that was known of the poet and playwright at the time, a first-rate set of literary annotations and glosses, invaluable commentary on all the plays, and other essential secondary resources such as a stage history of the plays, Jonsonian allusions, and a reconstruction of Jonson's personal library.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation and Innovation in the Intertheatrum Period, 1642-1660: the Survival of the London Theatre Community
    Preservation and Innovation in the Intertheatrum Period, 1642-1660: The Survival of the London Theatre Community By Mary Alex Staude Honors Thesis Department of English and Comparative Literature University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2018 Approved: (Signature of Advisor) Acknowledgements I would like to thank Reid Barbour for his support, guidance, and advice throughout this process. Without his help, this project would not be what it is today. Thanks also to Laura Pates, Adam Maxfield, Alex LaGrand, Aubrey Snowden, Paul Smith, and Playmakers Repertory Company. Also to Diane Naylor at Chatsworth Settlement Trustees. Much love to friends and family for encouraging my excitement about this project. Particular thanks to Nell Ovitt for her gracious enthusiasm, and to Hannah Dent for her unyielding support. I am grateful for the community around me and for the communities that came before my time. Preface Mary Alex Staude worked on ​Twelfth Night​ 2017 with Alex LaGrand who worked on ​King Lear​ 2016 with Zack Powell who worked on ​Henry IV Part II ​2015 with John Ahlin who worked on ​Macbeth​ 2000 with Jerry Hands who worked on ​Much Ado About Nothing​ 1984 with Derek Jacobi who worked on ​Othello ​1964 with Laurence Olivier who worked on ​Romeo and Juliet​ 1935 with Edith Evans who worked on ​The Merry Wives of Windsor​ 1918 with Ellen Terry who worked on ​The Winter’s Tale ​1856 with Charles Kean who worked on ​Richard III 1776 with David Garrick who worked on ​Hamlet ​1747 with Charles Macklin who worked on Henry IV​ 1738 with Colley Cibber who worked on​ Julius Caesar​ 1707 with Thomas Betterton who worked on ​Hamlet​ 1661 with William Davenant who worked on ​Henry VIII​ 1637 with John Lowin who worked on ​Henry VIII ​1613 with John Heminges who worked on ​Hamlet​ 1603 with William Shakespeare.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spanish Match and Jacobean Political Thought, 1618-1624
    Opposition in a pre-Republican Age? The Spanish Match and Jacobean Political Thought, 1618-1624 Kimberley Jayne Hackett Ph.D University of York History Department July 2009 Abstract Seventeenth-century English political thought was once viewed as insular and bound by a common law mentality. Significant work has been done to revise this picture and highlight the role played by continental religious resistance theory and what has been termed 'classical republicanism'. In addition to identifying these wider influences, recent work has focused upon the development of a public sphere that reveals a more socially diverse engagement with politics, authority and opposition than has hitherto been acknowledged. Yet for the period before the Civil War our understanding of the way that several intellectual influences were interacting to inform a politically alert 'public' is unclear, and expressions of political opposition are often tied to a pre-determined category of religious affiliation. As religious tension erupted into conflict on the continent, James I's pursuit ofa Spanish bride for Prince Charles and determination to follow a diplomatic solution to the war put his policy direction at odds with a dominant swathe of public opinion. During the last years of his reign, therefore, James experienced an unprecedented amount of opposition to his government of England. This opposition was articulated through a variety of media, and began to raise questions beyond the conduct of policy in addressing fundamental issues of political authority. By examining the deployment of political ideas during the domestic crisis of the early 1620s, this thesis seeks to uncover the varied ways in which differing discourses upon authority and obedience were being articulated against royal government.
    [Show full text]
  • Latitudinarianism from Acontius to Chillingworth Ann Mccauley Askew
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 1-1-1966 Latitudinarianism from Acontius to Chillingworth Ann McCauley Askew Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Askew, Ann McCauley, "Latitudinarianism from Acontius to Chillingworth" (1966). Honors Theses. Paper 217. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. to Increasing strife. and disunity develoned in religious matters in England a.fte.r 1-600. Simultaneously moderate men be.cc.me incre.J.sin~ly concerned about the future of ," unified 'jhristianity. s . .p h Probably the most synb~me.tic 2.nd relin;iously concJ_ous.. o._ t e solutions offe>.re.d re.sill ted from the T·rnrl::. of three dedic.?.tecl l?.y- men, the La titud:i_nari'.:'..ns. To John T-to_J_es of Et-:Yn, HiU.i~m Chi1.lin~rnrth, and T_.ucius Gary, Viscount Falk:land, J_,«:i.titudinarianism ,.,ras the result o:f: 1-heir intensive study of t1te e111inent reli':f,io1J.s philosoDhers from the P.. ::nnaisance to their own time. Lcititudin2.rianism, a lay philosorihy, re..'ited on thre.2 primary tenets. To brin~ pe::i.ce 2nd unity to th0.. Christi2n r·rnrJ.d once more., men must t-oler2te. o.11 Christic-.n beliefs .;end re.pudio.te. persecution. Each inrlividual_ must employ' his reason to lea?n God's will and gain s~lvation, deriendin~ only on the Bible as 'ln in.f£1.llible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabethan Protestant Press: a Study of the Printing and Publishing of Protestant Literature in English
    THE ELIZABETHAN PROTESTANT PRESS: A STUDY OF THE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING OF PROTESTANT RELIGIOUS LITERATURE IN ENGLISH, EXCLUDING BIBLES AND LITURGIES, 1558-1603. By WILLIAN CALDERWOOD, M.A., B.D. Submitted for the Ph.D. degree, University College. (c\ (LONBI 2 ABSTRACT Uninterrupted for forty-five years, from 1558 to 1603, Protestants in England were able to use the printing press to disseminate Protestant ideology. It was a period long enough for Protestantism to root itself deeply in the life of the nation and to accumulate its own distinctive literature. English Protestantism, like an inf ant vulnerable to the whim of a parent under King Henry VIII, like a headstrong and erratic child in Edward's reign, and like a sulking, chastised youth in the Marian years, had come of age by the end of the Elizabethan period. At the outset of Elizabeth's reign the most pressing religious need was a clear, well-reasoned defence of the Church of England. The publication of Bishop Jewel's Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae in 1562 was a response to that need and set the tone of literary polemics for the rest of the period. It was a time of muscle- flexing for the Elizabethan Church, and especially in the opening decades, a time when anti-Catholicism was particularly vehement. Consistently throughout the period, when Queen and country were threatened by Catholic intrigues and conspiracies, literature of exceptional virulence was published against Catholicism. But just as the press became an effective tool for defenders and apologists of the Church of England, it soon was being used as an instrument to advance the cause of further reform by more radical Protestants.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51704-1 - Reason and Religion in the English Revolution: The Challenge of Socinianism Sarah Mortimer Excerpt More information Introduction On the fertile banks of the river Czarna, in the south of the Polish Commonwealth, lay the town of Rakow. In the early seventeenth century it was a peaceful, idyllic town, filled with craftsmen and workshops and dominated by its flourishing Academy. Its atmosphere of learning and of harmony made such an impression on one visitor that he felt himself ‘transported into another world’. For, as he recalled, all its inhabitants were ‘calm and modest in behaviour, so that you might think them angels, 1 although they were spirited in debate and expert in language’. Yet Rakow was the centre of Socinianism, a theological position perceived as so danger- ous that it could only have been raked out of hell by men intent on blaspheming against God. It was denounced in lurid terms, by Protestants and Catholics alike, and outlawed in almost every country in 2 Europe. From Rakow, the Socinians produced a series of religious and political works which spread across Europe, capturing the attention of scholars, clerics and educated laymen. Few religious groups inspired such extreme reactions, or found such careful readers. The people of this quiet, well-ordered Polish town had a lasting impact in Europe and this book will explore the English reaction to their potent theology. It was widely agreed that the Socinians posed a serious challenge to European religion and society – and yet the nature of the challenge they presented has never been fully explored or explained.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan @ Copyright By
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 6 7-245 7 HINELY, Jan Lawson, 1936- THE SONNET SEQUENCE IN ELIZABETHAN POETRY. The Ohio State U niversity, Ph.D ., 1966 Language and Literature, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan @ Copyright by Jan Lawson Hinely 1967 THE SONNET SEQUENCE IN ELIZABETHAN POETRY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University Ely Jan Lawson Hinely B.A., Midwestern University, 1957 M.A., The Ohio State University, 1958 The Ohio State University 1966 Approved by Adviser Department of Engl' PREFACE This dissertation should properly be dedicated to four people: to my parents, who encouraged, to Saralyn, who per servered, and to Bruce, who endured. I owe more than I can express to the unfailing courtesy, wide scholarship, and sound critical judgment of my adviser, Harold R. Walley, and wish as well to pay inadequate tribute to the inspiration and guidance, over several years, of Richard Altick, Ruth Hughey, James Logan, Francis Utley, and Harold Wilson. They have a part, always, in whatever scholarly excellence I may achieve. Finally, I wish to thank Mrs. John Kempt on, whose aid in preparing the manuscript was invaluable. VITA January 19. 1936 Bom - Philipsburg, Missouri 1957 .......... B.A., Midwestern University, Wichita Falls, Texas 1957-1961 .... Graduate Assistant, Department of English The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1958 .......... M.A., The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1961-1962 .... University Fellow, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1962-I963 .... Instructor, Division of Comparative Literature The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1963-1966 ...
    [Show full text]