DOCSLIB.ORG

National Reach. Local Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Reach. Local Service National Reach. Local Service. Symmetry Elevating S…, 5/21/12 4:55 PM Section 144216 Comment [1]: PRINTING INSTRUCTIONS: To print document WITHOUT comments. VERTICAL WHEELCHAIR LIFTS * Press Print * In the Print Box in the option “Print What” select “Document” in the drop down menu. PART 1 GENERAL Any Questions call 877.568.5804 for immediate assistance. 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES: Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/5/12 3:52 PM A. UL – Unenclosed. Comment [2]: This section is based on the B. SL – Shaftway. products of Symmetry Elevating Solutions. Tel: 877- C. EL – Enclosed. 568-5804, Web: www.symmetryelevator.com D. Hybrid (Elevator Style Lift). Symmetry Elevating Solutions is a US Owned & Operated company specializing in the 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS: manufacturing of Wheelchair Lifts, Residential A. Section 00330 - Cast–in-Place Concrete: Concrete shaftway and anchor placement. Elevators and Limited Use/Limited Application B. Section 04800 - Masonry Assemblies: Masonry shaftway and anchor placement. Elevators. A leader in the accessibility industry with a reputation for quality and reliability, Symmetry is C. Section 06100 - Rough Carpentry: Blocking in framed construction for lift attachment. industry leading with innovative products. D. Section 09260 - Gypsum Board Assemblies: Gypsum shaft walls. The Symmetry Elevating Solutions Vertical E. Division 16 – Electrical: Dedicated telephone service and wiring connections. Wheelchair Lift is available in UL (unenclosed), SL (Shaftway), EL (Enclosed & Hybrid, all models are F. Division 16 – Electrical: Lighting and wiring connections at top of shaft. suitable for indoor or outdoor use. The UL is a self- G. Division 16 – Electrical: Electrical power service and wiring connections. contained unenclosed VPC designed for lifting 1.03 REFERENCES: heights up to 60” and can be mounted directly to the floor or in a shallow pit. The SL is installed in a A. This lift shall be designed and tested in accordance with ICC/A117.1, NEC and ASME A18.1 shaftway with a lifting height up to 168”. The lift Guidelines. platform and drive tower are located in the B. All designs, clearances, construction, workmanship and installation shall be in accordance shaftway while each landing consists of a door or gate. The EL travels up and down within its own, with the requirements and code adopted by the authority having jurisdiction. self-contained enclosure. In addition to the drive C. This platform lift shall be subject to local, city and state approval prior to and following tower, lift platform, and enclosure, this unit also has installation. landing doors and/or gates fully integrated into the walls themselves. Lifting height up to 168”. The 1.04 SUBMITTALS: Hybrid VPC looks and feels like an elevator, but A. Submit under provisions of Section 01300. operates like a lift. Available in many different size and configurations, features include full a height B. Product Information: cab, non-load bearing ceiling and a wide variety of 1. Submit manufacturer’s installation instructions including preparation and equipment finishes. Lifting height up to 168”. handling requirements. Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/5/12 3:56 PM 2. Show maximum and average power necessity. Comment [3]: Select Vertical Wheelchair Lift(s) C. Drawings shall include: required for this project and delete one(s) not required. 1. Typical details of assembly, erection and anchorage. Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/5/12 3:53 PM 2. Wiring diagrams for power, control, and signal systems. Comment [4]: Delete any sections below not 3. Complete layout with location of equipment. relevant to this project; add others required. D. Manufacturer’s Certificates must certify products meet or exceed specified requirements. 1.05 QUALITY ASSURANCE: A. Manufacturer: Company shall contain personnel with not less than ten (10) years of experience in the design and fabrication of vertical wheelchair lifts. B. Technical Services: Manufacturer and authorized dealer shall work with architects, engineers and contractors to adapt the vertical wheelchair lift to the design and structural requirements of the building, site, and code requirements. C. Unit must be assembled and tested in factory before shipment. Vertical Wheelchair Lift equipment shall meet or exceed the National and Local standards. D. All load ratings and safety factors shall meet or exceed those specified by all governing agencies with jurisdiction and shall be certified by a professional engineer. E. Installer Qualifications: Factory trained and licensed to install equipment of this scope, with evidence of experience with specified equipment. Installing company shall have qualified people available to ensure fulfillment of maintenance and callback service. 1.06 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A. Provide Vertical Wheelchair Lift complying with: 1. ASME A18.1 – Safety Code for Platform Lifts 2. ASME A17.1 – Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators 3. ASME A17.5 – Elevator and Escalator Electrical Equipment 1.07 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING: A. Products stored in manufacturer’s unopened packaging until ready for installation. B. Components stored off the ground in a dry covered space, protected from weather conditions. 1.08 PROJECT CONDITIONS: A. Vertical Wheelchair Lift not to be used for hoisting materials or personnel during construction. 1.09 WARRANTY: A. Unit shall have a FOUR (4) year limited parts warranty covering replacement of defective parts Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/6/12 9:22 AM of the basic unit, including all electrical and drive system components, at no cost. Labor costs Comment [5]: The manufacturers basic warranty is a 4 year limited parts. Warranty requires required to replace parts is not included. Preventative maintenance agreement required. maintenance agreement during the warranty B. Extended Warranty: Provide an extended manufacturer’s warranty covering the vertical period. wheelchair lift components for the following additional period beyond the initial standard four Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/6/12 9:23 AM year warranty. Preventative Maintenance every six (6) months required. Comment [6]: Extended Warranty is optional. 1. 3 years (7 years total). Select the Extended Warranty option and delete ones not required. 2. 6 years (10 years total). 3. Lifetime. 1.10 MAINTENANCE A. Maintenance of the vertical wheelchair lift unit shall consist of regular cleaning, inspection, and Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/6/12 9:50 AM adjustment of the unit at intervals not longer than every six (6) months. Rule 10.2.1 of ASME Comment [7]: Include this section if Standard or Extended warranty is specified above. Select one of A18.1 required all Vertical Wheelchair Lifts to be inspected every six (6) months. Provide the Maintenance Service options and delete the maintenance contract for the following years: ones not required. 1. 4 years. 2. 7 years. 3. 10 years. 4. Lifetime. PART 2 PRODUCT 2.01 MANUFACTURER: A. Acceptable Manufacturer: Symmetry Elevating Solutions Email: [email protected] Toll Free: 877-568-5804 Website: www.symmetryelevators.com B. U.S. OWNED AND OPERATED: Manufacturer must registered U.S. owned company and manufacturing operation located in the United States of America – America Owned, American Operated. C. No Substitutions Allowed. D. Request for substitutions will be considered in accordance with provisions of section 01600. Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/6/12 9:51 AM 2.02 UNENCLOSED VERTICAL WHEELCHAIR LIFT: Comment [8]: Select one of the Substitution options and delete the one not required. A. General Description: The Unenclosed vertical platform lift is designed for lifting heights up to 60”. Versatile enough for indoor or outdoor use, this unit can either be mounted directly to the Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/6/12 9:52 AM Comment [9]: floor or in a shallow pit. Note to Specifier: Select one or more of the following four Vertical B. Capacity: Wheelchair Lift types based on the application 1. 750 lbs. needed for this project. Delete the ones not required. C. Lifting Height 1. Up to 42 inches. Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/6/12 9:56 AM 2. Up to 60 inches. Comment [10]: Select one of the Lifting Height 3. Up to 72 inches (Residential Application only). options and delete the ones not required. Lifting height for pitted application: Distance from 4. Up to 96 inches (Residential Application only). the bottom of the pit to the upper floor level. 5. Up to 120 inches (Residential Application only). Lifting height for non-pitted application: Distance 6. Up to 144 inches (Residential Application only). from the floor to the upper floor level. 7. Up to 168 inches (Residential Application only). D. Platform Size: 1. 36” W x 48” D Symmetry Elevating Sol…, 6/6/12 9:59 AM 2. 36” W x 54” D Comment [11]: Select one of the Platform Size options and delete the ones not required. Custom 3. 36” W x 60” D platform sizes are also available in 1” increments. 4. 38” W x 54” D Maximum platform size is a code related item. 5. 42” W x 60” D Verify maximum platform size with local city and state authority having jurisdiction. Contact 6. Custom Size _____ W x _____ D Symmetry Elevating Solutions for details. E. Platform Configuration: 1. Straight Through. Symmetry Elevating S…, 6/6/12 10:00 AM 2. Enter/Exit same side. Comment [12]: Select one of the Platform Configuration options and delete the ones not 3. 90 Degree. required. F. Gate/Door: 1. Gate Height: 42 inches. 2. Platform Gate: Travels with platform and opens at lower landing. 3. Upper Landing Gate: Detached, freestanding type. G. Landing Openings: 1. Lower Landing: Door. Symmetry Elevating S…, 6/6/12 10:02 AM 2. Lower Landing: Gate. Comment [13]: Select Landing Opening options for Upper and Lower landing. Delete the ones not 3. Upper Landing: Door. required. 4. Upper Landing: Gate. H. Door Construction: 1. 42 inch tall Landing/Platform Gate. Symmetry Elevating S…, 6/6/12 11:27 AM 2. 80 inch tall gate. Comment [14]: Select the Door Construction options needed for this Project.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Needs Transportation Inventory
    Special Needs Transportation Inventory Moving People, Changing Lives A publication of the Snohomish County Special Needs Transportation Coalition December 17, 2002 Special Needs Transportation Inventory Snohomish County Special Needs FLT Consulting, Inc. Transportation Coalition P.O. Box 12522 Snohomish County Human Services Olympia, WA 98508 2722 Colby Avenue 360.352.9926 Everett, WA 98201 [email protected] (425) 388-7202 DECEMBER 17, 2002 Acknowledgements The commitment and hard work of the Snohomish County Special Transportation Needs Steering Committee is directly responsible for this document, The Special Transportation Needs Inventory, and for keeping alive the vision of coordinated special needs transportation in Snohomish County. The active committee members are recognized here: Casey Stevens, Tribal Planner, Stillaguamish Tribe; Co-Chair Coey Gilleland, Director of Transportation, Senior Services of Snohomish County, Dial-A-Ride Transportation Program; Co-Chair Denise Brand, Case Management Services Supervisor, Snohomish County Human Services, LongTerm Care & Aging Dorothy Spiwak, Operations Supervisor for Paratransit Services, Everett Transit Gretchen Weber, ADA Outreach Coordinator, Community Transit Jerri Mitchell, Director of Catholic Community Services Volunteer Services Marty Bishop, Administrator, Snohomish County Human Services, Children, Family & Community Services Meg Strong, Snohomish County Human Services, Developmental Disabilities Melissa Rogers, Call Center Supervisor, Medicaid Transportation, Snohomish County
    [Show full text]
  • 1983 Ketron Inc
    DOT-TSC-U MT A -83-2 Wheelchair Lifts on U.S.Department of Transportation Transit Buses Urban Mass Transportation Administration Prepared by: January 1983 Ketron Inc. H: 3 1 ~ 190 i EQUIPM ENT ENGlNEERING DEPARTMENT NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Trans­ portation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to th e object of this report. DOT-TSC-U tv'IT A-83-2 S.C.R. T.D. LIBRARY Wheelchair Lifts on U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transit Buses Transportation Administration Summary of U. S. Experience Prepared by: Ketron Inc. One Broadway Cambridge MA 02142 Office of Technical Assistance Office of Bus and Paratransit Systems Washington DC 20590 0-7548 ~ .. PREFACE This project was conducted for the USDOT Transportati on Systems Center (TSC) and the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) by KETRON, Inc . - Cambridge Facility. The contract \vas initiated in September, 1980 betv1een TSC and Applied Resour ce Integration, Ltd. (ARI) of Boston - Contract r~o . DTRS57-80-C-00150 . In 1981 KETRON acquired ARI and t he project was continued and completed by the same project teom . The successful completion of t he project is attr ibutabl e to the cooperation of a large number of organizations and personnel representing t r ansit properties, bus manuf ac t ur Prs, lift su pp liers , and others concerned v1ith the problem of acccssi­ bil ity on public transit systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Definition and Properties of Alternative Bus Service Reliability Measures at the Stop Level
    Definition and Properties of Alternative Bus Service Reliability Measures at the Stop Level Definition and Properties of Alternative Bus Service Reliability Measures at the Stop Level Meead Saberi and Ali Zockaie K., Northwestern University Wei Feng, Portland State University Ahmed El-Geneidy, McGill University Abstract TheTransit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (TCQSM) provides transit agen- cies with tools for measuring system performance at different levels of operation. Bus service reliability, one of the key performance measures, has become a major con- cern of both transit operators and users because it significantly affects user experi- ence and service quality perceptions. The objective of this paper is to assess the exist- ing reliability measures proposed by TCQSM and develop new ones at the bus stop level. The latter are not suggested as replacements for the existing measures; rather, they are complementary. Using empirical data from archived Bus Dispatch System (BDS) data in Portland, Oregon, a number of key characteristics of distributions of delay (schedule deviation) and headway deviation are identified. In addition, the proposed reliability measures at the stop level are capable of differentiating between the costs of being early versus late. The results of this study can be implemented in transit operations for use in improving schedules and operations strategies. Also, transit agencies can use the proposed reliability measures to evaluate and prioritize stops for operational improvement purposes. 97 Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2013 Introduction Monitoring of the performance measures of public transportation systems has improved since advanced surveillance, monitoring, and management systems have been deployed by transit agencies worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making
    Project No: FTA-VA-26-7222-2004.1 Federal United States Transit Department of August 2004 Administration Transportation CharacteristicsCharacteristics ofof BusBus RapidRapid TransitTransit forfor Decision-MakingDecision-Making Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the United States Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES August 2004 COVERED BRT Demonstration Initiative Reference Document 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making 6. AUTHOR(S) Roderick B. Diaz (editor), Mark Chang, Georges Darido, Mark Chang, Eugene Kim, Donald Schneck, Booz Allen Hamilton Matthew Hardy, James Bunch, Mitretek Systems Michael Baltes, Dennis Hinebaugh, National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Lawrence Wnuk, Fred Silver, Weststart - CALSTART Sam Zimmerman, DMJM + Harris 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transit Capacity
    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 3 RAIL TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. RAIL CAPACITY BASICS ..................................................................................... 3-1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 3-1 Grouping ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 The Basics................................................................................................................... 3-2 Design versus Achievable Capacity ............................................................................ 3-3 Service Headway..................................................................................................... 3-4 Line Capacity .......................................................................................................... 3-5 Train Control Throughput....................................................................................... 3-5 Commuter Rail Throughput .................................................................................... 3-6 Station Dwells ......................................................................................................... 3-6 Train/Car Capacity...................................................................................................... 3-7 Introduction............................................................................................................. 3-7 Car Capacity...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release Human Rights Authority
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE HUMAN RIGHTS AUTHORITY - PEORIA REGION REPORT OF FINDINGS Case # 11-090-9004 CityLink INTRODUCTION The Human Rights Authority (HRA) opened an investigation after receiving a complaint of possible rights violations against CityLink, a bus company. Complaints alleged the following: 1. Lack of accessibility for an individual in a wheelchair who is using bus services If found substantiated, the allegations would violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (28 CFR s 36.211, 36.201, 36.203, 36.202), the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (36 CFR s 1192.21, 1192.23) and the Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR s 37 and 49 CFR s 38.). CityLink is a bus company that services the Peoria Heights, West Peoria, Peoria, East Peoria, Bartonville and Pekin areas. They average approximately 2 million passengers per year, and their CityLift service, which primarily services people with disabilities, services approximately 10,000 individuals per year. CityLink is a municipal corporation that has 168 total employees. To investigate the allegations, HRA team members met and interviewed members of the CityLink staff and reviewed documents pertinent to the case. COMPLAINT STATEMENT The complaint states that an individual using a wheelchair attempted to board a CityLink bus and was not allowed on. The complainant stated that the individual was told by the bus driver that the bus lift did not work. The complaint states that the lift did work but the bus driver just did not want to manually open the lift so that the rider could get onto the bus. The bus rider with the wheelchair reportedly has to go to the bus barn to be able to ride an accessible bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Riders' Guideto Public Transit for People with Disabilities
    Riders’ Guide to Public Transit for People with Disabilities BY MEETING THE CHALLENGE, INC. CHALLENGE, THE MEETING BY ADA Complementary Paratransit Complementary ADA Fixed Route Fixed Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................5 Fixed Route ADA Requirements for Fixed Route ....................................7 Alternative Formats for Schedules and Service Information .......................................................7 Accessible Stations, Terminals, and Stops ...................8 Fares and Personal Attendants .......................................9 Respirators and Portable Oxygen ................................11 Service Animals ..................................................................11 Mobility Devices .................................................................12 Lifts and Ramps on Buses ...............................................13 Accessibility Features for Standing Passengers ......14 Priority Seating Area .........................................................16 Wheelchair Securement on Buses ...............................17 Wheelchair Accessibility Requirements for Light and Rapid Rail .............................................21 Stop Announcements ......................................................21 Disembarking ......................................................................21 Suspension of Service ......................................................22 ADA Complaint Procedures and Enforcement .......22 Tips for Riding
    [Show full text]
  • Fta Circular 4710.1 Americans with Disabilities Act Guidance Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction and Applicability
    CIRCULAR U.S. Department of Transportation FTA C 4710.1 Federal Transit Administration November 4, 2015 Subject: AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA): GUIDANCE 1. PURPOSE. This circular provides guidance to recipients and subrecipients of Federal Transit Administration (FTA) financial assistance necessary to carry out provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s implementing regulations at 49 CFR Parts 27, 37, 38, and 39. 2. CANCELLATION. This is a new circular. It does not cancel any existing directive. 3. SCOPE. This circular applies to all assistance authorized by the Federal Transit Laws (49 U.S.C. Chapter 53) and all programs administered by FTA. 4. AUTHORITIES. a. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 b. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended c. 49 CFR Parts 27, 37, 38, and 39 d. Federal Transit Laws, 49 U.S.C. 5301 et seq. 5. WAIVER. FTA reserves the right to waive any requirements of this circular to the extent permitted by law. 6. FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE. In conjunction with publication of this circular, FTA published a notice in the Federal Register on October 5, 2015, addressing comments received during development of the circular. 7. AMENDMENTS TO THE CIRCULAR. FTA reserves the right to update this circular to reflect changes in other revised or new guidance and regulations that undergo notice and comment, without further notice and comment on this circular. FTA will post updates on our website at www.fta.dot.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2Nd Edition PART
    Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition PART 5 RAIL TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. RAIL CAPACITY FUNDAMENTALS................................................... 5-1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 5-1 Line Capacity ...................................................................................................................5-2 Train Control and Signaling....................................................................................... 5-2 Dwell Time ................................................................................................................... 5-3 Operating Margin........................................................................................................ 5-3 Turnbacks ..................................................................................................................... 5-3 Junctions .......................................................................................................................5-4 Mode-Specific Issues ................................................................................................... 5-5 Person Capacity ............................................................................................................... 5-5 Loading Diversity........................................................................................................ 5-5 Number of Cars ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline Specifications for Passive Lifts, Active Lifts, Wheelchair Ramps, and Securement Devices
    US Department Guideline Specifications for of Tronsportmon Passive Lifts, Active Lifts, Wheelchair Ramps and Securement Devices September 1992 Guideline Specifications for Passive Lifts, Active Lifts, Wheelchair Ramps, and Securement Devices Revised Edition September 1992 Prepared by Gerald A. Francis and David Norstrom Batelle 505 King Street Columbus, Ohio 43201-2693 Prepared for Office of Technical Assistance and Safety Federal Transit Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 Distributed in Cooperation with Technology Sharing Program U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 DOT-T-93-03 METRIC / ENGLISH CONVERSION FACTORS ENGLISH TO METRIC METRtC TO ENGLISH LENGTH (APPROXIMATE) LENGTH ~APPROXIMAW 1 inch(in) = 2.5 centimeters (cm) 1 millimeter (mm) = 0.04 inch (in) 1 foot (f-t) = 30 centimeters (cm) 1 centimeter (cm) = 0.4 inch (in) ‘- 1 yard (yd) = 0.9 meter(m) 1 meter(m) f 3.3 feet (ft) 1 mile(mi) = 1.6 kilometers (km) 1 meter(m) = 1.1 yards(yd) 1 kilometer (km) = 0.6 mile (mi) AREA (APPROXIMATE) AREA (APPROXIMATE) 1 square inch (sq in. in*) = 6.5 square centimeters (cm*) 1 square centimeter (cm*) = 0.16 square inch (sq in, in*) 1 square foot (sq ft. ft*) = 0.09 square meter (m*) 1 square meter (ml) = 1.2 square yards (sq yd, yd*) 1 square yard (sq yd. yd*) = 0.8 square meter (m*) 1 square kilometer (km*) = 0.4 square mile (sq mi. mis) 1 square mile (sq mi, mP) = 2.6 square kilometers (km*) 1 hectare (he) = 10,000 square meters (m*) = 2.5 acres 1 acre = 0.4 hectares (he) = 4,000 square meters (m*) MASS - WEIGHT (APPROXlklAlE)
    [Show full text]
  • Wheelchair Accessibility in the 90S
    Wheelchair accessibility in the 90s Wheelchair accessibility in the 90s Experimental wheelchair lift fitted to 2846 (From Transit Vancouver newsgroup on yahoo groups) > Interesting to note as well that at one time, 2846 was fitted with a wheelchair lift as an experiment to see how difficult it would be to fit lifts in the trolleybus fleet. The lift was fitted to the rear doors... resulting in a 3 seat- bench being placed opposite the rear exit. To make up for the lost seats, some of the left side single seats were replaced with doubles. The doors were replaced with "slide glide" doors (as on NFIs), but it was found they didn't work too well, and the bi-folds were put back on and the lift removed. Oh, yeah. Thanks for bringing this one up. I had thought I'd done a pretty good job repressing this unhappy memory. The bus was done to see how difficult it would be to convert the trolleys, seeing as they formed the backbone of service in Vancouver itself. Flyer supplied a kit of parts for the project, including the doors, which were in a rather familiar orange/red paint scheme - they simply took two off of a MUNI D902 and sent them along with the door hardware. Putting the thing together was not that bad. The bus was removed from the revenue fleet and assigned to the Training section and while it did see some revenue service, it was not used on any regular run. This is when the issue of "street furniture" first came up.
    [Show full text]
  • Paratransit Service Information & Eligibility
    1830 Golden State Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Phone (661) 324-9874 www.getbus.org PARATRANSIT SERVICE INFORMATION & ELIGIBILITY Regulatory Definition: Eligibility for GET-A-Lift paratransit service is directly related to the inability of a person with a disability to use the existing fixed route service. The regulations describe three specific circumstances under which a person would be considered ADA paratransit eligible. 1. An individual who is unable, as the result of a physical or mental impairment (including a vision impairment), without the assistance of another person (except the operator of a wheelchair lift or other boarding assistance device), to board, ride or disembark from an accessible bus. A person who is unable to “navigate” the system (e.g., recognize & board the correct vehicle, having available the correct fare/and or using the fare collection system, recognize destination, and understanding transfers that might have to be made.) 2. Any individual who could use the fixed route service, but cannot because the fixed route he/she wants to ride is not wheelchair lift equipped. When all fixed route buses are accessible, eligibility will not be granted under this category. GET’s fleet is 100 % accessible. This condition would apply when an individual travels outside of GET’s service area as a visitor. 3. A person whose disability interacts with the environment to prevent travel to or from a bus stop. Distance to or from the stop alone does not make a person eligible. In addition, lack of fixed route service or inconvenient bus schedules is not a basis for eligibility. GET-A-Lift service is provided within ¾ miles of, and during similar hours as, GET’s regular fixed route service.
    [Show full text]