ILD Integration - Internal and External A Review
Karsten Buesser
24.09.2013 ILD Workshop Cracow Introduction
• An integrated detector model for ILD has been developed for the DBD/TDR • No site-specific issues have been taken into account • Now we have a site in northern Japan • At the same time ILD is undergoing the next round of optimisation • improvements, cost efficiency, sharpening of physics case • Subdetector collaborations get more experience with realistic full-system and full- scale prototypes • More realistic designs of mechanics, cabling, cooling • Time to review the current design w.r.t. realistic boundary conditions • Internal integration: the ILD engineering model • External integration: integration with the machine and SiD ILD in its Natural Environment... ILD Mechanical Design
R. Stromhagen
Update on model later today Yoke
NB: Endcap Design for ILD@CLIC is different
R. Stromhagen Calorimeter Integration Analogue HCAL
K. Gadow K. Gadow Semi-Digital HCAL
J.C. Ianigro
• 5 Rings: • Structure mass: 440 t • Detector mass: 184 t • Total mass 624 t ECAL Installation Si/W ECAL Ecal integration steps ( Assembly hall) :
A full ( mechanical ) stave structure is mounted on a frame ( yellow) making a beam The beam is then placed on its transport and storage cradle( orange)
Adaptation of this tooling to the ILD considerations and to the moutain site constraints
C. Clerc The stave is then ready to be equipped with slabs , cabled and tested C. Clerc
ILD MDI session, Kyushu University 21 May 2012 To be done 8 times
ILD MDI session, Kyushu University 21 May 2012 TPC Integration V. Prahl
FEA studies Inner Region
• Integration procedure : Using the same TPC insertion tool, adapt on it an apparatus to support and insert the inner parts. Used the TPC center to guide and roll inside, During insertion, control the deformation, stress and Inner Detector alignment Adjusted with the TPC references Fixed on TPC • Need adjustable fixation to the TPC endplateInner Region • push-pull precision is only Assembly procedure1 mm details:
• Level 5+• stay-clear from pairs is of same order....
Fukuoka University, ILD meeting May 2012 C. Bourgeois A. Gonnin & C .Bourgeois 15
Fukuoka University, ILD meeting May 2012 A. Gonnin & C .Bourgeois 12 Service Paths
C. Clerc Service Paths Optimisation
C. Clerc Questions
• Is our engineering model still valid? • Are major ILD design changes to come? • smaller yoke, other geometries? • How do we proceed with the different subdetector options? • fully integrated ILD models for all possible permutations? • Do we understand the service needs for all sub-detectors? • Cooling, cabling, fire protection, (...)? • Do we understand the heat budget? • Do we understand possible vibration sources and limits? • How do we keep close links between subdetector collaborations and central integration team? • How earthquake-proof are the subdetector designs? • (...)
ISO 3010
Seismic ConditionsInternational Standard
Based for Design of Structures - Seismic Actions on Structures 1. Outline about Two Candidate Sites in Japan
SEFURI-Site KITAKAMI-Site • Talk by Tauchi-sanISO3010 on2001 Thursday Seismic Hazard Map in Japan : Maximum acceleration (gal) B A • Need toInternational follow ISO3010: Organization for Standardization in recurrence intervals of earthquakeSite-B
Kawasumi map : based on earthquakes from 679 to 1,948 in Japan Editoriala) (ultimate Note: We limit are state: granted ULS) the permission The structure for reproduction should not of collapse permitted nor the extract of the codeexperience in the World other ListT=75 2008 similar years from forms the ISO of Centralstructural Secretariat. failure due to severe earthquake Paragraphs 1, 5, 6 and annexes A, B, C of ISO 3010:2001, Basis for design of structures – ground motions that could occur at the site . Site-A Seismic actions on structures are reproduced with the permission of the International 100 years Organizationb) (serviceability for Standardization, limit state: ISO. SLS) This The standard structure can shouldbe obtained withstand from any moderate ISO membe r
and earthquakefrom the Web ground site of motionsthe ISO Centralwhich maySecretariat be expected at the following to occur address: at the sitewww.iso.org . Copyrightduring remains the service with ISO. life of the structure with damage within accepted limits. 200 years Honshu In bothJ-PARC cases, the seismic force can be the maximum acceleration of earthquakes 100gal in the recurrenceSite-A intervals of 100 years. - Belong to FUKUOKA & SAGA - Belong to IWATE & MIYAGI The ISO 3010 is expected to be used Prefecture as a raw materialMax. in for accelerationKYUSHUnew national regulations District in cities, or as a guidelineJapan Prefecture in TOHOKU District for revising existing200gal national regulations. - Located in stable Granite zone kyushu - Located in stable Granite zone 2013 5 29 年 月• 日1水曜日 gal ~ 0.001g- Have not Active Faulty zone - Have not Active Fault zone Site-B - Separate from Volcanoy Front line - Separate from Volcano Front line - Annual300gal average Temperature:12℃ - Annual average Temperature:10℃ - Annual total Precipitation : 2,400mm - Annual total Precipitation : 1,300mm 100 y M.Miyahara(Site Inspection)y LCWS,Arlington,UTA,Oct22-26,2012 4
y y 2013年 5月 29日 水曜日 T. Tauchi Sendai Tokyo Nagoya Osaka Sapporo Niigata Fukuoka Okinawa Site-A Site-B
2013年 5月 29日 水曜日 When an Earthquake Hits...
• From KEK 03/11 earthquake damage report Belle$detector
Belle$detector$was$posi;oned$in$the$assembly$ hall$next$to$the$collision$hall,$for$the$major$ upgrade$(8$meters$each,$weight:$1400$ton)$ The$detector$was$fixed$with$32$anchor$bolts$ thru$brackets.$$All$anchor$bolts$were$broken$ by$the$earthquake$and$the$en;re$detector$ slid$by$about$6$cm.$ No$serious$damages$were$observed$by$ visual$inspec;ons.$$Further$inspec;ons$are$ necessary,$especially$for$inner$part$such$as$ CsI$crystals$and$glass$plate$detectors.
19 Seismic Conditions 13 Global Design Effort - CFS 3.11 Seismic Observation
Red wave form: Surface on SUMITA Blue wave form: -106m Granite Zone in IWATE Pre.
Acceleration comparison of the Surface & underground at SUMITA in IWATE
Observation Data Acceleration (gal) Rate Direction Undergrund 800 Observation points Surface Underground /Surface KiK-net Observation Network N-S 333.4 83.7Red : Surface0.25 Blue: -200m (Kiban:Bedrock, Kyoshin:Strong-Motion) E-W 384.2 86.8 0.23 Data by “National Research Institute for U-D 388.9 73.5 0.19 Earth Science and Disaster Prevention”
2012/3/23 CFS Baceline Technical Review M. Miyahara Earthquake Simulations
CLIC_SiD'yoke'–'JJPARC'spectrum' 6.3'm/s2'
Horizontal
Maximum'deformaBon:'46.4(mm( Maximum'deformaBon:'22.4(mm( JJPARC'J'ND280'magnet'system'spectrum' Courtesy:'T.'Tauchi'(KEK)'
Rigid'strategy'not( feasible'in'high' seismicity'locaBons(
Maximum'v.'Mises'stress:'601(MPa( Maximum'v.'Mises'stress:'626(MPa(
Earthquake(protec5on(for(Linear(Collider(detectors(–(LCWS12,(Arlington,(USA(|( 16(
F. Duarte Ramos LCD Engineering & Integration Detector with seismic isolated feet Each barrel stands on feet that are isolated In this solution separated parts are still protected during maintenance when detector is opened
Friction pendulum bearings
May 21-25, M. Herdzina, Physics Dept. CERN Page 21 External Integration: ILD, SiD, and ILC... Boundary Conditions
• IR Interface Document
• Functional requirements for the co-existence of two experiments and the machine in a push-pull scenario
• ILC-Note-2009-050
• Major milestone and deliverable for TDR
• Need to re-visit this in view of the site decision
• Started discussions with SiD
21 9000 = 15510=
A
B B 15755 8000 245
ILD Iron Yoke 2000
A = 18000= = 13240= Section A-A = 17900= • Total cost of yoke: Inner view Yoke_Rout 7755 Scale 1:10 • 95 MILCU 3750 3600 3500 3200 2680 2627 2600 2450 3.16m • 80 MILCU for steel and
F machining F
7.3. ILD cost evaluation
4595 IP Figure III-7.2 4340 Summary plot of the relative contribution 3440 by the di erent sub-3345 components to the total cost of the ILD 2058 detector. 50 2028 644 370 219 125 2249 1847 1446 1045 1843 1808
IP 330 165
140 mrad
57 36 • A reduction of the iron could save 15.5 C a lot 7.3.6 Muon system Ind. Date Modification By Surface finish : Gen. Tol. : ISO 1302 Detail F ILD Material : Mass : .... g Section B-B Scale 1/4 Treatment : .... Ra : 3,2 6620 5460 5420 3960 3937 2650 2635 2450 2420 2350 Parameter drawing Drawn by M. Joré 09/11/10 Scale 1:30 The muon system being made of scintillator read out with SiPM like the AHCAL, the costs have been Checked by ... ../../01 Approved by ... ../../.. LABORATOIRE DE L'ACCELERATEUR LINEAIRE Scale Index Bat. 208, BP 34, 91898 ORSAY CEDEX FRANCE derived from there. It corresponds mostly to the procurements of materials without assembly and Tel. 01 64 46 83 63 - Fax 01 64 46 83 47 1/60 ILD0E0001 0 tooling. The cost is dominated by the costs if the sensor system. In total 6.5 MILCU is estimated.
7.3.7 Cost summary
The total cost of the ILD detector is summarised in Table III-7.7. The distribution of the costs Table III-7.7 Summary table of the System Option Cost [MILCU] Mean Cost [MILCU] cost estimate of the ILD detector. Depend- Vertex 3.4 ing on the options used Silicon tracking inner 2.3 2.3 the cost range is be- Silicon tracking outer 21.0 21.0 tween 336 Mio ILCU and 421 Mio ILCU. TPC 35.9 35.9 ECAL 116.9 SiECAL 157.7 ScECAL 74.0 HCAL 44.9 AHCAL 44.9 SDHCAL 44.8 FCAL 8.1 8.1 Muon 6.5 6.5 Coil, incl anciliaries 38.0 38.0 Yoke 95.0 95.0 Beamtube 0.5 0.5 Global DAQ 1.1 1.1 Integration 1.5 1.5 Global Transportation 12.0 12.0 Sum ILD 391.8
among the di erent systems is shown in Figure III-7.2. The cost driving items are the yoke, and the calorimeter system. The cost for the integration is an estimate of the scenario described in section 5.1, and might vary significantly with di erent scenarios. It includes the extra cost for the large platform (see chapter 5.5.1) on which the detectors moves, as well as the extra costs of the cryogenics needed to allow a cold move of the detector. The o ine computing represents a significant cost. Owing to the continued large advances in computing technology, we have estimated this at 20% of the equivalent cost for a LHC detector. A first estimate of the person-power needed has been done. For each calorimeter it is estimate to be around 200 MY, for the coil, 500 MY. From this the total person-power needed is extrapolated to
Detectors: ILD Detailed Baseline Design ILC Technical Design Report: Volume 4, Part III 309 ILD Magnetic Field Simulations
• CST EM Studio • ILD DBD design yoke with 4T field
very very preliminary ILD Magnetic Field Simulations
• Other options:
CST EM STUDIOCST EM STUDIO 09/17/2013CST EM STUDIO - 10:1909/17/2013 - 10:19 09/12/2013 - 12:45 • smallerCST yokeEM STUDIO with 4T field (left) and 3.5T field (right) 09/12/2013 - 12:45
A. Petrov
File: G:\ILD\ild_12\12_2_2_platen_schlitzdicht_kurz _4t_2009.cst File: G:\ILD\ild_12\12_2_2_platen_schlitzdicht_kurz_3,5t_2009.cst File: G:\ILD\ild_12\12_2_2_platen_schlitzdicht_kurz_4t_2009.cst File: G:\ILD\ild_12\12_2_2_platen_schlitzdicht_kurz_3,5t_2009.cst ILD Magnetic Field Simulations
• Smaller Yoke, 4T: CST MICROWAVE STUDIO 09/17/2013 - 11:21 • ~55G at 15m • B-Field (Ms)_Abs (Y)_1 0.025 run 4 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.02 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.01 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000 Y / mm
A. Petrov
File: G:\ILD\ild_12\12_2_2_platen_schlitzdicht_kurz_4t_2009.cst ILD Magnetic Field Simulations
• Smaller Yoke, 3.5T: CST •MICROWAVE>40G STUDIOat 15m 09/12/2013 - 12:49
B-Field (Ms)_Abs (Y)_1
0.02
0.019
0.018
0.017
0.016
0.015
0.014
0.013
0.012
0.011
0.01
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000 Y / mm
A. Petrov
File: G:\ILD\ild_12\12_2_2_platen_schlitzdicht_kurz_3,5t_2009.cst ILD Magnetic Field Simulations
• Smaller Yoke, 3.5T: CST •MICROWAVE>40G STUDIOat 15m 09/12/2013 - 12:49
B-Field (Ms)_Abs (Y)_1
0.02
0.019
0.018 0.017 Caveat: need to 0.016
0.015 0.014 understand precision 0.013 0.012 of these calculations 0.011
0.01 0.009 better ! 0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000 Y / mm
A. Petrov
File: G:\ILD\ild_12\12_2_2_platen_schlitzdicht_kurz_3,5t_2009.cst Common Services
• Many detector service systems are common for SiD and ILD • One example: common cryogenic system (c.f. talk by Okamura-san):