DOCSLIB.ORG

Administrator U.S. Agency for International Development 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20523 USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Administrator U.S. Agency for International Development 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20523 USA Better information for better results Better tracking of resources for women’s and children’s health Better oversight of results and resources: nationally and globally Dr Rajiv Shah Administrator U.S. Agency for International Development 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20523 USA May 31, 2012 Dear Rajiv, We are writing to you as members of the independent Expert Review Group (iERG), a 7-person body created by the UN Secretary-General's Commission on Information and Accountability for Women's and Children's Health. Our task is to serve as the principal global review group on accountability for the Global Strategy on Women's and Children's Health, "Every Woman, Every Child". We report to the UN Secretary-General, through WHO's Director-General. We are tasked with producing an annual report on accountability for women's and children's health, released in September at the UN General Assembly, We are aware that a meeting is soon to take place in Washington, DC (June 14-15) - "Child Survival Call to Action: Ending Preventable Child Deaths." This meeting, we understand, is being convened by the governments of the US, India, and Ethiopia, in partnership with UNICEF. Although several entities are involved, much of the visible leadership seems to be coming from the US, and specifically USAID. For example, it was mostly your colleague, Dr Ariel Pablos-Mendez, who ably and powerfully represented the purpose and goals of the Call to Action at the recent World Health Assembly in Geneva. We also understand that USAID has also been convening the preparatory meetings for the event. While it is commendable that there is to be increased global attention to child survival, we are conscious of concerns about this forthcoming meeting. We wish to summarise and convey these concerns to you, as colleagues working together with you for women's and children's health, but also as part of the emerging global oversight mechanism for women's and children's health put in place by the UN Secretary-General. These concerns are not ours alone. We have heard them expressed by many parties working in women's and children's health. 1/3 Independent Expert Review Group (iERG) of the Commission on Information and Accountability for Women's and Children's Health Secretariat hosted by the World Health Organization Room 3154, 20 avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Website: www.who.int/woman_child_accountability/ierg/¨ Better information for better results Better tracking of resources for women’s and children’s health Better oversight of results and resources: nationally and globally 1. There is considerable disquiet about the process leading to this meeting. The MDGs set targets that were agreed multilaterally through UN processes by all countries of the world. The success in mobilising countries and donors, among others, to commit politically to these goals came from the democratic, participatory, and multilateral process that produced them. There has been no such UN member-state driven process (that we are aware of) to set the new target of 2 million under- 5 deaths by 2035. Several of us are aware, however, of considerable concerns from country representatives about another goal being imposed in this way, outside of the usual multilateral mechanisms. 2. The meeting is branded as a "Child Survival Call to Action". It has taken a decade of hard work and successful collaboration to create the notion of the continuum of care - programmatically addressing the need to tackle MDGs 1c, 4, 5, and part of 6 (PMTCT) through a comprehensive and integrated approach to reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. The meeting in June emphasises child survival in a way that may take us backwards, not forwards, from this concept. We have heard this view expressed strongly by many who work in other areas of the continuum of care. Branding a meeting as exclusively focused on child survival risks damaging the programmatic progress we have all made during the past decade. 3. We have learned that a new scorecard is being designed to monitor progress towards the new 2035 goal. However, again after a decade of work, there is already a widely agreed scorecard - that produced by the Countdown to 2015 group. We are puzzled as to why another competing scorecard is being devised. This parallel initiative will produce duplication and potentially confuse and dilute the efforts so far made to create a successful accountability mechanism across the continuum of care. We would welcome your clarification as to the need for yet another competing scorecard. 4. We are concerned about feasibility. The average annual decline in child mortality for high- burden countries has been around 2% . The MDG goal required a decline of 4.3%, a tough but still feasible target. Attaining the proposed 2035 goal would require long-term annual rates of under-5 mortality decline that have been achieved by, at most, only a handful of countries over much more limited periods. While we strongly endorse the idea of challenging aspirational goals, we are anxious that an unfeasible goal will simply be another way to show that Africa has "failed". We do not see this possible result as helpful to making global progress in women's and children's health. 5. We are also anxious that a 2035 target - 23 years away - is simply too distant to be politically realistic. The temptation for parties to the goal in June to postpone action, given the limited immediate political pressure to act and the lack of multilateral mechanisms for accountability, is potentially great. 2/3 Independent Expert Review Group (iERG) of the Commission on Information and Accountability for Women's and Children's Health Secretariat hosted by the World Health Organization Room 3154, 20 avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Website: www.who.int/woman_child_accountability/ierg/¨ Better information for better results Better tracking of resources for women’s and children’s health Better oversight of results and resources: nationally and globally We would like to underline again that the concerns we are expressing are not ours alone. We have heard them repeated by colleagues in countries, civil society, other UN agencies, and academia. The members of the iERG are unswerving in our commitment to support the Secretary-General's ambitious and entirely achievable Global Strategy, "Every Woman, Every Child". But we are concerned that the Child Survival Call to Action may inadvertently trigger a set of events that divert global attention from the broader agenda of women's and children's health that many of us have fought so hard for, as you have, this past decade. We have two recommendations. First, that the June meeting be framed very differently. We believe it is imperative that the meeting - in its title and content on both days - be organised around the continuum of care. We believe that most members of the child survival community would endorse such a shift in emphasis. Second, we suggest that the meeting is constructed as a proposal to the global community for the post-2015 period. We believe, based on our consultations with many parties, that the meeting you are organising would then be seen, first, as a valuable opportunity to reflect on the lessons of past success and, second, as a means to begin the translation of those lessons into new goals (perhaps as part of the Sustainable Development Goal process now in its early stages of discussion and planning). You would also be able to use the meeting to launch an intensive period of discussion within, and led by, countries. This way, we keep the 2015 MDG target firmly in place, but use the Washington event as a platform for looking forward, inviting others to join what needs to be a participatory, multilaterally led process. The iERG would very much support such a framing for the meeting on June 14-15, and we would be keen to be part - as an accountability mechanism - of the follow up. We look forward very much to hearing from you soon. Yours faithfully, The Members of the iERG Carmen Barroso Zulfiqar Bhutta Richard Horton (Co-Chair) Dean Jamison Joy Phumaphi (Co-Chair) Marleen Temmerman Miriam Were cc: Mr. Ban Ki-moon, United Nations Secretary-General Dr. Margaret Chan, WHO Director General Mr. Anthony Lake, UNICEF Executive Director Shri. Ghulam Nabi Azad, Minister of Health and Family Welfare, India Dr. Tedros Adhanom, Minister of Health, Ethiopia 3/3 Independent Expert Review Group (iERG) of the Commission on Information and Accountability for Women's and Children's Health Secretariat hosted by the World Health Organization Room 3154, 20 avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Website: www.who.int/woman_child_accountability/ierg/¨ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dr. Rajiv Shah
    Dr. Rajiv Shah leads the efforts of nearly 10,000 staff in more than 70 countries around the world to advance USAID’s mission of ending ex- treme poverty and promoting resilient, democratic societies. Under Dr. Shah’s leadership, USAID has applied innovative technologies Dr. Rajiv Shah and engaged the private sector to solve the world’s most intractable de- velopment challenges. This new model of development brings together an Administrator increasingly diverse community—from large companies to local civil soci- ety groups to communities of faith—to deliver meaningful results. Dr. Shah leads President Obama’s landmark Feed the Future and Power Africa initiatives and has refocused America’s global health partnerships to end preventable child death. Feed the Future, alone, has improved nu- trition for 12 million children and empowered more than 7 million farmers with climate-smart tools they need to grow their way out of extreme pov- erty. In April 2014, USAID launched the U.S. Global Development Lab to harness the expertise of the world’s brightest scientists, students, and entrepreneurs. At the same time, the newly formed Private Capital Group for Development forges a more strategic relationship between private capital and development. Dr. Shah also manages the U.S. Government’s humanitarian response to catastrophic crises around the world, from the devastating 2010 Haiti earthquake to Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines to the Ebola epidemic in West Africa. Through an extensive set of reforms called “USAID Forward,” Dr. Shah has worked with the United States Congress to transform USAID into the world’s premier development Agency that prioritizes public-private part- nerships, innovation, and meaningful results.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Philanthropy Forum Conference April 18–20 · Washington, Dc
    GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY FORUM CONFERENCE APRIL 18–20 · WASHINGTON, DC 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference This book includes transcripts from the plenary sessions and keynote conversations of the 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference. The statements made and views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of GPF, its participants, World Affairs or any of its funders. Prior to publication, the authors were given the opportunity to review their remarks. Some have made minor adjustments. In general, we have sought to preserve the tone of these panels to give the reader a sense of the Conference. The Conference would not have been possible without the support of our partners and members listed below, as well as the dedication of the wonderful team at World Affairs. Special thanks go to the GPF team—Suzy Antounian, Bayanne Alrawi, Laura Beatty, Noelle Germone, Deidre Graham, Elizabeth Haffa, Mary Hanley, Olivia Heffernan, Tori Hirsch, Meghan Kennedy, DJ Latham, Jarrod Sport, Geena St. Andrew, Marla Stein, Carla Thorson and Anna Wirth—for their work and dedication to the GPF, its community and its mission. STRATEGIC PARTNERS Newman’s Own Foundation USAID The David & Lucile Packard The MasterCard Foundation Foundation Anonymous Skoll Foundation The Rockefeller Foundation Skoll Global Threats Fund Margaret A. Cargill Foundation The Walton Family Foundation Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation The World Bank IFC (International Finance SUPPORTING MEMBERS Corporation) The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust MEMBERS Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Anonymous Humanity United Felipe Medina IDB Omidyar Network Maja Kristin Sall Family Foundation MacArthur Foundation Qatar Foundation International Charles Stewart Mott Foundation The Global Philanthropy Forum is a project of World Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookings Blum Roundtable
    BROOKINGS BLUM ROUNDTABLE FROM AID TO GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION ASPEN, COLORADO AUGUST 3 –5, 2011 Tuesday, August 2, 2011 Arrival and Check-In ROUNDTABLE LOCATION: Lauder Room Koch Seminar Building Aspen Meadows Resort 845 Meadows Road Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone: +1-970-925-4240 +1-800-452-4240 1 Wednesday, August 3, 2011 8:00 a.m. – 8:30 a.m. Breakfast Meadows Restaurant 8:40 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. Welcome Lauder Room Koch Seminar Building OPENING REMARKS Richard C. Blum, Blum Capital Partners, LP and Founder of the Blum Center for Developing Economies at Berkeley Mark Suzman, Global Development Program, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Kemal Derviş, Global Economy and Development, Brookings STATEMENT OF PURPOSE, SCENE SETTER, AND COMMENTS ON THE AGENDA Homi Kharas, Brookings 9:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Session I Lauder Room Koch Seminar Building REFRAMING DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION Moderator: Walter Isaacson, Aspen Institute In almost any discussion of international development, foreign aid takes center stage. But while aid can certainly be a catalyst for development, it does not work in isolation. Participants will discuss the key objectives of development cooperation, consider what measures of development cooperation are most valuable for recipients, and explore an effective balance of roles and responsibilities - including both public and private players - in today’s evolving development landscape. Introductory Remarks: Owen Barder, Center for Global Development Donald Kaberuka, African Development Bank Group Ananya Roy, University of California, Berkeley Elizabeth Littlefield, Overseas Private Investment Corporation 10:30 a.m. – 10:50 a.m. Break 2 Wednesday, August 3, 2011 10:50 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release: UN Secretary General Appoints SUN Lead Group
    UNITED NATIONS PRESS RELEASE For immediate release UN Secretary-General Appoints 27 Global Leaders to Head Worldwide Effort to Address Child Malnutrition Heads of State and Other High- Level Representatives to Focus on Improving Nutrition as Key to Progress in Health and Development United Nations, New York, 10 April 2012 – The global Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement continues to gain momentum today with the convening of 27 leaders committed to advancing the strength and security of nations by improving maternal and child nutrition. This influential group, appointed by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to represent the many countries, organizations and sectors working to improve nutrition, will serve as strategic guides for this global Movement. “Never before have so many leaders, from so many countries and fields, agreed to work together to improve nutrition,” said Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. “The Scaling Up Nutrition Movement gives all of us, including the UN, an opportunity to support countries in their efforts to end hunger and malnutrition.” The members of the Lead Group include Heads of State from countries that have prioritized efforts to scale up nutrition, as well as representatives of the donor, civil society, business and UN system organizations that are aligning resources to help SUN countries drive progress. Members of the Lead Group are listed below: additional Members may be invited to join later. The Group’s role is to ensure that the countries at the heart of the Movement are supported as they work to create tangible and sustainable improvements in nutrition. In addition to providing strategic oversight, the Lead Group will help to mobilize support and strengthen both coordination and accountability within the Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, MD, Msc Qualifications & Biography
    Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, MD, MSc Qualifications & Biography DR. SHAH IS A RESPECTED LEADER WITH A PROVEN TRACK RECORD IN GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT WITH DEEP EXPERIENCE IN MANY SECTORS, INCLUDING HEALTH, AGRICULTURE, WATER, AND FINANCIAL SERVICES: • He has led and worked with many of the initiatives that are defining best practice in the field of development - The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, The Global Fund for AIDS, TB and Malaria and The Alliance for a Green Revolution for Africa (AGRA) to name a few. With respect to AGRA in particular, Dr. Shah helped create the organization, build the board, recruit leadership and oversee operations. • He has worked around the world (especially in Africa and Asia), and has deep content and operational experience in global health, agriculture and food security and financial services for the poor. Raj helped launch the Global Development program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and directly managed the foundation’s nearly $1.3 billion portfolio of investments in agricultural development. He also was the founding director of the Foundation’s Financial Services to the Poor portfolio and held numerous leadership roles within the Foundation Global Health program. Dr. Shah has also helped lead and is an important contributor to President Obama’s global food security initiative. • He has worked closely with many organizations who are key partners to the USAID and its mission. These include the Global Fund for AIDS, TB and Malaria, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and a range of innovative public-private partnerships in a variety of sectors in global development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Controversy Over USAID Procurement Reform
    AP PHOTO/WALLY SANTANA PHOTO/WALLY AP Is Local Spending Better? The Controversy over USAID Procurement Reform By Casey Dunning November 2013 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Is Local Spending Better? The Controversy over USAID Procurement Reform By Casey Dunning November 2013 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 The evolution of USAID’s efforts 28 Tracking the results of USAID’s local procurement reform 31 Recommendations to cement local procurement reform at USAID 36 Conclusion 37 About the author & Acknowledgements 38 Appendix: USAID country presence 39 Endnotes Introduction and summary Procurement reform is not a topic that usually quickens the pulse. But efforts at the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, to utilize other countries’ local governments and organizations to carry out its programs on the ground have triggered a debate that will ultimately affect millions of lives in the years to come. Over the past three years, USAID has undertaken an initiative to direct more of its projects around the globe to local partners in the countries in which it works. The agency has referred to these ongoing reforms under a series of different names, including implementation and procurement reform, or IPR; sustainable partner- ships; and local solutions. Despite the evolving nomenclature, the basic premise of the effort has remained the same: USAID is seeking to directly work with and build the capacity of local governments, civil society, and the private sector in the countries in which it operates. USAID maintains that such a shift will make devel- opment efforts more effective, more enduring, and less costly. USAID began these reforms after recognizing that it was extraordinarily depen- dent on large American for-profit contactors and nongovernmental organi- zations, or NGOs, to carry out its work.
    [Show full text]
  • United G20 Must Pave the Way for Robust Post- COVID-19 Recovery
    ISSUE BRIEF United G20 Must Pave the Way for Robust Post- COVID-19 Recovery NOVEMBER 2020 PHIL THORNTON he world is facing unprecedented health and economic crises that require a global solution. Governments have again locked down their economies to contain the mounting death toll from the second wave of the COVID-19 Tpandemic. With this response well underway, now is the time to move into a recovery effort. This will require a coordinated response to the health emergency and a global growth plan that is based on synchronized monetary, fiscal, and debt relief policies. Failure to act will risk a substantial shock to the postwar order established by the United States and its allies more than seventy years ago. The most effective global forum for coordinating this recovery effort is the Group of 20 (G20), which led the way out of the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2009, the closest parallel we have to the current catastrophe. Eleven years ago, world leaders used the G20 meeting in London as the forum to deliver a unified response and a massive fiscal stimulus that helped stem economic free fall and prevented the recession from becoming a second Great Depression. A decade on, it is clear that the G20 is the only body with the clout to save the This report is written and published in global economy. This does not mean that the G20 should be the only forum for accordance with the Atlantic Council actions for its member states. The United States, for example, should also work Policy on Intellectual Independence.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Testimony of Dr. Rajiv Shah Administrator, U.S. Agency
    TESTIMONY OF DR. RAJIV SHAH ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FY 2013 BUDGET REQUEST HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE, SUBCOMMITTEE ON STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS, AND RELATED PROGRAMS WASHINGTON, DC MARCH 6, 2012 Thank you Chairwoman Granger, Ranking Member Lowey, and members of the Committee. I am honored to join you to discuss the President’s fiscal year 2013 budget request for USAID. Two years ago, President Obama and Secretary Clinton called for elevating development as a key part of America’s national security and foreign policy. Through both the Presidential Policy Directive on Global Development and the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, they made the case that the work USAID’s development experts do around the globe was just as vital to America’s global engagement as that of our military and diplomats. The President’s FY 2013 budget request enables USAID to meet the development challenges of our time. It allows us to respond to the dramatic political transformations in the Middle East and North Africa. It helps us focus on our national security priorities in frontline states like Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan. And it strengthens economic prosperity, both at home and abroad. This budget also allows us to transform the way we do development. It helps countries feed, treat and educate their people while strengthening their capacity to own those responsibilities for themselves. It helps our development partners increase stability and counter violent extremism. It supports those who struggle for self-determination and democracy and empowers women and girls. And it helps channel development assistance in new directions—toward private sector engagement, scientific research and innovative technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • 20110614 Shah Transcript
    Department of International Development and International Growth Centre (IGC) public lecture Delivering Meaningful Results in Global Development: A lecture by Dr Raj Shah, Administrator of USAID London School of Economics Tuesday 14 June, 2011 Check against delivery http://www.usaid.gov/press/speeches/2011/sp110614.html WELCOME: Purna Sen, Head of Human Rights, The Commonwealth Secretariat PURNA SEN: Good morning. Good to see you all here. I'm Purna Sen; I'll be chairing the session this morning where we're absolutely delighted to be able to welcome Dr. Rajiv Shah to the LSE. Now, I explained to Dr. Shah this morning that I have a very long bio for him, but I won't go through it all. And I have his permission to miss some bits out. But let me tell you a little about him, and then a little about what he's going to speak to us about this morning. Dr. Shah is the 16th administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, a post he took up in December 2009. Previously, he had been an undersecretary for research, education and economics and chief scientist as the U.S. Department of Agriculture. And he was also director of agricultural development at the Global Development Program in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Prior to that, he was the health care policy advisor for the Gore 2000 presidential campaign and a member of the Pennsylvania government – Governor Ed Rendell's transition committee on health. He is co-founder of the Health Systems Analytics and Project IMPACT for South Asian Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening USAID: a Timeline of Recent Events
    Strengthening USAID: A Timeline of Recent Events May 31, 2011 - Agricultural development has historically been a significant component of U.S. foreign aid. While in the 1980s 25 percent of U.S. foreign aid went to agriculture, that number dropped to six percent by 1990 and was a meager one percent by 2008.1 As U.S. support for agricultural development has declined, so has the capacity of USAID to deliver agricultural assistance. In 1997, USAID ceased to be an independent agency with the Administrator reporting to the President and was folded into the State Department.2 In 2006, the Secretary of State created a Foreign Assistance Bureau within the State Department (State/F) to more closely align the USAID budget and activities with the State Department’s diplomacy objectives, ending USAID’s budget autonomy. While President G.W. Bush increased the foreign aid budget significantly, the aims of USAID’s development work were anchored in the President’s National Security Strategy. Furthermore, President Bush’s signature development initiatives, such as President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), were placed outside of USAID. Yet the events of the past two years show that the tide may be turning. On the agricultural assistance front, President Obama’s inaugural promise - “To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish…” - launched a renewal of the global agricultural development agenda. This assurance has translated into a series of policy actions: at the G-8 meeting in L’Aquila, Italy, in July 2009, the United States pledged to invest $3.5 billion in food security and agricultural development over three years; the initiative to fulfill this pledge, Feed the Future, was formally launched by the Secretary of State in May 2010 and was highlighted as a signature program when President Obama issued the first-ever Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) for Global Development in September 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Matters: Pioneering Innovation Today for Health Impact
    Innovation Pioneering innovation today for health matters im Pact tomorrow Amie Batson Seth Berkley Balram Bhargava Agnes Binagwaho Børge Brende Steve Davis Haitham El-noush Anthony Fauci Craig Friderichs Tore Godal Glenda Gray Felix Olale Allan Pamba Rajiv Shah Peter Singer Gavin Yamey With a message from UN Secretary- General Ban Ki-moon Smart phone- readable and standardized QR codes to track medicines? A field-based test for water safety that quantifies risk? Simulation programs to help health workers manage emergency obstetric and neonatal care? A highly efficacious HIV vaccine? Diagnostic and screening tools for malaria and TB, tailored specifically for low-resource settings? m essage from the Un secretary-general Since the launch of the Every Woman Every Child movement in 2010, leaders from government, civil society, multilateral organizations, and the private sector have worked hand-in-hand to improve health and save lives around the world. By Ban Ki-moon Building on earlier work, our collective efforts have achieved much progress: Secretary-General Maternal and child deaths have been cut by almost half since 1990. Remarkable of the United Nations technological advances in recent years, such as low-cost vaccines, new drugs, diagnostic tools, and innovative health policies, have driven this unprecedented reduction in maternal and child mortality. The innovative Every Woman Every Child partnership model has proven to be a game-changer for women’s and children’s health, demonstrating the immense value of bringing all relevant actors to the table. Many other innovations, including more efficient distribution networks, the use of mobile technologies to reach women in rural areas, and local vaccine production, have also played an important role in generating new progress for women’s and children’s health.
    [Show full text]
  • Madeleine K. Albright Global Development Lecture the Aspen Institute Madeleine K
    THE FIRST ANNUAL GLOBALMadeleine DEVELOPMENT K. Albright LECTURE Honoring Dr. Rajiv Shah Administrator United States Agency for International Development August 1, 2012 | Aspen, Colorado Madeleine K. Albright Global Development Lecture The Aspen Institute Madeleine K. Albright Global Development Lecture will recognize an individual whose bold vision has provided breakthrough thinking to tackle the challenges of global development. The Aspen Institute is an educational and policy studies organization based in Washington, DC. Its mission is to foster leadership based on enduring values and to provide a nonpartisan venue for dealing with critical issues. The Institute has campuses in Aspen, Colorado, and on the Wye River on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. It also maintains offices in New York City and has an international network of partners. Aspen Global Health and Development’s mission is to address persistent global health and development challenges by promoting breakthrough solutions at scale. We promote and accelerate these solutions by informing and strengthening the capacity of political leaders, moving country-level best practices to global policy attention, developing and promoting new evidence, and providing high-level forums for debate and implementation of innovative strategies that have the potential to result in positive, large-scale outcomes. The Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs (ANDE) is a global network of organizations that propel entrepreneurship in emerging markets. The network’s 150+ members provide critical financing and business support services to small and growing businesses that create positive economic, social, and environmental impacts in developing countries. The Brookings Blum Roundtable is an off-the-record annual forum for global leaders, entrepreneurs and practioners to discuss innovative ideas and advance groundbreaking initiatives to alleviate global poverty.
    [Show full text]