DOCSLIB.ORG

Budget 2011 and Environmental Taxes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Budget 2011 and Environmental Taxes House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Budget 2011 and environmental taxes Sixth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/eacom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 29 June 2011 HC 878 Published on 7 July 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £15.50 The Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Joan Walley MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) (Chair) Peter Aldous MP (Conservative, Waveney) Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) [ex-officio] Neil Carmichael MP (Conservative, Stroud) Martin Caton MP (Labour, Gower) Katy Clark MP (Labour, North Ayrshire and Arran) Zac Goldsmith MP (Conservative, Richmond Park) Simon Kirby MP (Conservative, Brighton Kemptown) Mark Lazarowicz MP (Labour/Co-operative, Edinburgh North and Leith) Caroline Lucas MP (Green, Brighton Pavilion) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Sheryll Murray MP (Conservative, South East Cornwall) Caroline Nokes MP (Conservative, Romsey and Southampton North) Mr Mark Spencer MP (Conservative, Sherwood) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Simon Wright MP (Liberal Democrat, Norwich South) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152A. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/eacom. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. The Reports of the Committee, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and some or all written evidence are available in a printed volume. Additional written evidence may be published on the internet only. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Simon Fiander (Clerk), Edward White (Second Clerk), Lee Nicholson (Committee Specialist), Andrew Wallace (Senior Committee Assistant), Jill Herring (Committee Assistant), Emily Harrisson (Sandwich Student) and Nicholas Davies (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Environmental Audit Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6150; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] Budget 2011 and environmental taxes 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 Our inquiry 5 2 Principles of environmental taxation 6 Increasing the proportion of environmental taxes 6 Definition of environmental taxes 8 Setting the tax rate—raising revenue or promoting environmental change 10 Complexity and fairness 13 Evaluation 15 Natural capital 16 Strategy 18 3 Transport taxes 19 Motoring taxes 19 Aviation taxes 22 4 The Carbon Floor Price 26 The impact on competitiveness 26 Nuclear power 27 5 The ‘Plan for Growth’ 30 Green economy 30 Green Investment Bank update 31 6 Conclusion 34 Conclusions and recommendations 35 Formal Minutes 40 Witnesses 41 List of printed written evidence 41 List of additional written evidence 41 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 43 Budget 2011 and environmental taxes 3 Summary Taxation has an important role to play in helping to protect the environment. Whether ensuring at least some of the environmental cost is borne by those responsible, or making an environmentally damaging activity economically unattractive, environmental taxes create an incentive to move towards more sustainable behaviours. For environmental taxes to be effective they need to be straightforward so that taxpayers understand the behavioural change signal being sent, and seen as fair so that political momentum can be gained for higher environmental taxation. In practice, however, many perceive them as just another means of raising revenue, and their growing complexity means that many businesses are unaware of the cumulative impact of the environmental taxes affecting them. There is a pressing need for Government to take a more coherent approach to environmental taxation. A clear strategy should be adopted, setting out their objectives and rationale, the basis on which rates are set, and how their impact will be evaluated. Even partially hypothecating revenues from environmental taxes for environmental ends can also help to build greater acceptance, whilst also providing much needed funding for the low-carbon transition. Announcements on transport taxes in the Budget were disappointing. By dropping a penny on Fuel Duty rates and providing few tax incentives to switch to lower carbon transport alternatives, the Government missed an opportunity to be much clearer with the public about the long-term need to switch to lower carbon alternatives. The proposed changes to Air Passenger Duty will do nothing to make it a more effective environmental tax. Abandoning plans for a per-plane duty, albeit on legal advice, and relying on the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is a risky approach, because its success in reducing aviation emissions turns on the wider effectiveness of the EU ETS in curbing emissions more generally. It cannot be all stick and no carrots. A shift to environmental taxes must be accompanied by a corresponding reduction of taxes on the things that are valued by society, such as jobs, incomes and profits. There is also a role for other policy instruments alongside taxes to help achieve the desired change. The Government’s definition of a ‘subsidy’ in relation to nuclear is not robust and does not hold up to scrutiny. Nuclear will be subsidised in the same way as renewable energy sources, which have no adverse environmental impacts, and nuclear will benefit the most from the Carbon Floor Price mechanism. The Plan for Growth did not provide the much needed step change to aid the transition to a low- carbon economy, and in some areas—e.g. the zero carbon homes standard—the Government has taken a backwards step. The forthcoming Roadmap to a Green Economy must demonstrate a greater Government commitment to the green economy, and in doing so dispel any suggestion that a green economy is an ‘add-on’ rather than an integral part of the Government’s sustainable development plans. The Green Investment Bank could be a driver for the green economy but preventing the Bank from borrowing will limit its impact on renewables and the support it can provide for the Green Deal. Fresh consideration should be given to when, and under what fiscal circumstances, the bar on the Bank’s lending powers might be eased. Budget 2011 and environmental taxes 5 1 Introduction 1. This report follows a series of annual inquiries on the Pre-Budget Report and the environment in the previous Parliament by our predecessor Committees.1 They consistently found that Government was not doing enough to shift the balance of taxation from ‘goods’ (for example profits and income) to ‘bads’ (for example pollution) and expressed concerns that existing taxes such as Fuel Duty and Air Passenger Duty were not structured effectively to drive the change in behaviour needed for the transition to a low- carbon economy. 2. The 2011 Budget was delivered on 23 March 2011, and followed the current Government’s Spending Review in October 2010.2 The Budget Report stated: The Government is committed to being the greenest Government ever. A simple, efficient and cost effective policy framework will meet environmental objectives while supporting growth and maintaining a sound fiscal position. Market-based solutions to price carbon are at the heart of this approach, achieving objectives at the lowest possible cost. The Government will increase the proportion of tax revenue accounted for by environmental taxes.3 Alongside the 2011 Budget, the Government set out measures to deliver its priorities for the economy in the Plan for Growth,4 and launched a consultation on Air Passenger Duty.5 Our inquiry 3. Against this background, we decided to explore the principles of environmental taxes (Chapter 2). Our aim is to set out some foundations for future inquiries on environmental taxation and Budgets during the course of this Parliament. In this first report in this series, we go on to examine the application of these principles for transport taxes in particular (Chapter 3), the Carbon Floor Price (Chapter 4), and whether the Budget and Plan for Growth further the green economy agenda (Chapter 5). We received 43 submissions and took oral evidence from non-governmental organisations, think-tanks, academics and the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Justine Greening MP. We are grateful to them all. 1 Most recently: Environmental Audit Committee, Third Report of Session 2008-09, Pre-Budget Report 2008 —Green Fiscal Policy in a Recession, HC 202. 2 HM Treasury, Spending Review 2010, Cm 7942, October 2010. 3 HM Treasury, Budget 2011, HC 836, March 2011, paragraphs 1.110 and 1.111. 4 HM Treasury and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, The Plan for Growth, March 2011. 5 HM Treasury, Reform of Air Passenger Duty: a consultation, March 2011. 6 Budget 2011 and environmental taxes 2 Principles of environmental taxation 4. Taxation has an important role to play in helping to protect the environment by helping to incorporate the costs of environmental damage into the price of the goods, services or activities which give rise to it. Often, the side-effects of production and consumption that impact on the environment (‘environmental externalities’) do not enter into the calculations of producers and consumers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION4 22 Brighton 3Ts: CONSULTATION STATEMENT Stakeholder Consultation
    STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION4 22 Brighton 3Ts: CONSULTATION STATEMENT Stakeholder Consultation StaKEHOLDER Consultation 4.2 In addition to one-on- members on 15th July 2011 to provide MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT one meetings, a large number of an update on issues such as design, 4.1 Pre-application consultation stakeholders have been identified transport and sustainability in advance 4.7 A number of local MPs have has taken place with a range and invited to the public exhibitions. of submitting the planning application. been consulted and individual meetings of statutory and non-statutory To further engage with these groups have been held to explain the proposals stakeholders since the process began. at exhibitions ‘focus’ days were and provide opportunity for comment. Key stakeholders consulted through advertised where specialist consultants The following MPs have met with BHCC COUNCIL OFFICERS direct correspondence or one-on-one from different fields were present on BSUH to discuss the redevelopment: meetings include: alternate days to engage with key 4.6 A number of pre-application September 2009 - Andy Burnham stakeholders on their most relevant planning meetings have been held (MP for Leigh and Health Secretary) Brighton and Hove City Council issues. Focus days included transport, with BHCC officers to discuss a range visited the hospital to assess the Members heritage, sustainability, design, of topics including planning process, need for redevelopment and offered Brighton and Hove City Council construction, and clinical planning. sustainability, transport, design and his support. Officers, including Transport, heritage issues. These meetings BHCC MEMBERS th Planning, Ecology, Environmental have been an invaluable source of 10 September 2010 - Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Jones 1937
    RICHARD JONES 1937 ©ever-creative.co.uk WWW.SALTDEANLIDOCAMPAIGN.ORG SAVE SALTDEAN LIDO NEWSLETTER 4 - APRIL 2011 When the campaign group was formed just over A DATE FOR YOUR DIARY! a year ago, our first objective was to protect the Lido from being swamped by Dennis Audley’s On 4th June the Friends of Saltdean Lido are planned development. holding a Summer Fun Day in the Oval Park. There are lots of attractions planned for the With the recent announcement by the Secretary whole family, with a food market, arts & crafts of State of the upgrade to Grade II*, the only stalls, childrens’ games, a treasure hunt, some lido in the country to have such recognition, ‘extreme’ games for the more adventurous, dog we can confidently say Mission Accomplished! agility (bring-your-dog-&-have-a-go!) and lots of Within days of the announcement, Brighton & entertainment on stage over the day, with plen- Hove City Council had informed the leaseholder ty of seats to take the weight off your feet and emphatically that they would never entertain enjoy a drink or a cuppa. Even if the weather is residential development on the site. As Council- unkind, we’re covered (with possibly the largest lor Mary Mears said in her press release “It is marquee that Saltdean has ever seen) and we a complete non-starter. The council will never look forward to seeing you there. allow it.” In the evening of 4th June, the hugely popular The support that the campaign group received Brighton Beach Boys have generously offered throughout the lengthy upgrade process was to hold a benefit in aid of the Lido campaign, overwhelming and we must thank the thousands in the marquee.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Cornejo Tenure Letter
    Peace is an Ecosocialist Issue: Some Experiences from Local UK Politics and Suggestions for Global Action Judith Watson* It is difficult to comprehend why the world should be in a state of conflict more than 25 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, and hard not to conclude that armed conflict is intrinsic to capitalism. There is a problem with the post-war settlement, forged at Potsdam and Yalta, yet it is the only settlement that we have. The United Nations is hardly succeeding, yet we cannot admit its failures without suggesting that we dissolve the community of nations and elect another one. It seems, as Noam Chomsky has long pointed out, that the USA in particular needs to have a bogeyman; if not communism then resurgent Islam. The ecosocialist implications of permanent warfare are almost too simple to state in an academic journal. • War can be caused by environmental damage. The Syrian conflict seems to have been exacerbated by the drought of 2007 to 2010. The uprising started in March 2011. • War is an environmental disaster in its own right. • War divides people when they should be united, and is an obstacle to building the necessary counter-hegemony for a transition to socialism and to a low-carbon economy. There is also the question of the armaments industry itself, a lucrative, though not essential, component of the industrial base of some capitalist states. I would like to argue that building a strong international peace movement is an important task for the ecosocialist movement, even as it is building up its own strength.
    [Show full text]
  • MA P14-15 City Interview Webb.Indd
    14 City & Business 15 The big interview: Martin Webb scheme here. I know what others say, ment with excellent food, all made KEY DATES but Enterprise Inns has been great on the premises, real ale and no 1987 with us.” gimmicks. We’re a world It’s all in the detail Martin Webb graduates from He describes the Pub & “I wouldn’t use the word Martin Webb, reality show star and pub owner, has a simple formula for success. An obsession Brighton University and Kitchen concept, which gastropub. It’s not preten- away from old- sets up an — unsuccessful — he has developed with tious, you get big help- with quality and attentive management make all the difference, Phil Mellows discovers design company fellow entrepreneur ings on big plates. We school, Al Murray- Warrick Armsby- started with an all-Ital- style landlords 1993 Ward, as “a more ian menu, Tuscan, rus- illionaire philan- Webb is a bundle of entrepreneur- pubco C-Side, which he ran with have given a lot of money away, Joins Simon Kirby to form mature approach to tic food, and we’ve thropist, television ial energy who has learned, through Simon Kirby, now MP for Brighton though, up to £30,000 a year, what would become C-Side pubs”. added English dishes celebrity... Martin early failure, that you need more Kemptown. although it was only £15,000 last “It has some simi- because that’s what Webb answers to than a bright idea to succeed. It’s “I did two series of Risking It All,” year because of the recession.” 1998 larities to an Italian our customers want.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee MARRIAGE (SAME SEX COUPLES) BILL Ninth Sitting Tuesday 5 March 2013 (Morning) CONTENTS Written evidence reported to the House. CLAUSE 2 agreed to. CLAUSE 3 under consideration when the Committee adjourned till this day at Two o’clock. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £6·00 PBC (Bill 126) 2012 - 2013 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Saturday 9 March 2013 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 315 Public Bill Committee5 MARCH 2013 Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill 316 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: MR JIM HOOD,†MR GARY STREETER † Andrew, Stuart (Pudsey) (Con) McDonagh, Siobhain (Mitcham and Morden) (Lab) Bradshaw, Mr Ben (Exeter) (Lab) † McGovern, Alison (Wirral South) (Lab) † Bryant,
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Forename: Surname: Representing: Organisation (If Applicable): Email: What Do You Want Ofcom to Keep Confidential?: If Yo
    Title: Ms Forename: Angi Surname: Mariani Representing: Organisation Organisation (if applicable): Latest TV Email: What do you want Ofcom to keep confidential?: Keep nothing confidential If you want part of your response kept confidential, which parts?: Ofcom may publish a response summary: Yes I confirm that I have read the declaration: Yes Ofcom should only publish this response after the consultation has ended: You may publish my response on receipt Additional comments: Question 1: Do you agree that 20 locations should be set as a minimum roll- out obligation?: Yes, because having a minimum of 20 locations would be a commercially viable option if the multiplex operator is run as a for-profit business. Having that number will also facilitate effective knowledge sharing, and encourage supportive practice between the phase 1 pilot areas for local service providers. Latest TV in Brighton and Hove is already modelling and championing collaborative working methods at a local level by working in partnership with both Juice 107.2 FM, the city's radio station, and Wired Sussex, our leading digital company, and has cross-party support from all of our MP's as well as many other organisations and business groups in the city. We already have collaborative relationships across the country, such as with Element TV and You TV, and would also be looking to build a good working relationship with our multiplex provider. "Brighton & Hove is a world class arts and media city with a very significant digital industry and a council that would like to move Brighton & Hove towards becoming the digital capital of Europe and the directors of this bid have excellent programming, entrepreneurial/financial and engineering skills..
    [Show full text]
  • Help Create a Cycle
    Brighton & Hove Cycling Campaign www.bricycles.org.uk Spring 2017 No. 111 Bricycles Help meeng Tues 28 March create 6 pm to about 8 pm Thomas Kemp pub a cycle 8 St George’s Rd, Brighton BN2 1EB All welcome! ‘tube AGM map’ Bricycles AGM will be in May or June. Cycle maps have been developed in the style of the London tube When agreed, map by cycling groups in London, Bristol, Bath, Edinburgh, Kings details will be Lynn, Derby, Swansea, Birmingham and elsewhere. Help us create adversed on one for Brighton and Hove! It’s a new way of looking at the City Facebook, Twier and a useful way to highlight what’s good and and the website. what’s not to decision-makers. Details will also be space for The map will draw on the improvements needed available nearer cycling for cycling listed on Bricycles website. the me by Interested? Come to our meeng. Details above phoning / texng right. See the dra map at hp://bit.ly/2mexfUe 07731 773 847 Support Space for Cycling: Plan - Invest - Build Popular cycle crossing Brighton Bike Share threatened by IKEA A27 bikes revealed: page 3 scheme - See page 13 They’re coming in June! Brighton & Hove City Council’s ETS Members Environment, Transport and Gill Mitchell (Labour, Chair) Sustainability commiee (ETS) Tony Janio (Conservative Spokesperson) Peter Atkinson (Labour) Cityparks’ Open Spaces Strategy sets Lizzie Deane (Green) out policies, acons and an Louisa Greenbaum (Green Spokesperson) implementaon plan for the next 10 Joe Miller (Conservative) years (2017 – 2027). The ETS Commiee Alan Robins (Labour) Lee Wares (Conservative) Saoirse Horan (Labour, Deputy Chair) Geoffrey Theobald (Conservative) 14/3/17 Robert Nemeth (Conservative) 17/1/17 of 17 January approved the strategy subject to some further consultaon and a return to the commiee for final approval and further reports on the detailed implementaon plan and metable to be brought to future commiees.
    [Show full text]
  • Saturday 29 May 2010
    Contents House of Commons • Noticeboard .......................................................................................................... 1 • The Week Ahead .................................................................................................. 2 • Order of Oral Questions ....................................................................................... 3 Weekly Business Information • Business of the House of Commons 18 – 28 May 2010 ....................................... 4 Bulletin • Written Ministerial Statements ............................................................................. 6 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Commons 31 May – 4 June 2010 ........... 7 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Lords 31 May – 4 June 2010 .................. 9 Editor: Mary Durkin Legislation House of Commons Public Legislation Information Office • Public Bills before Parliament 2010/11 .............................................................. 10 London • Bills – Presentation, Publication and Royal Assent ............................................ 12 SW1A 2TT • Public and General Acts 2010/11 ....................................................................... 12 www.parliament.uk • Draft Bills under consideration or published during 2010/11 Session ............... 13 Tel : 020 7219 4272 Private Legislation Fax : 020 7219 5839 • Private Bills before Parliament 2010/11 ............................................................. 14 [email protected] Delegated Legislation • Statutory Instruments ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction from Duane Passman (Director of 3Ts)
    Introduction from Duane Passman (Director of 3Ts) On behalf of the Trust and 3Ts Project Team, I am pleased to publish the final version of the 3Ts Full Business Case (FBC), as approved by the Trust Board of Directors, NHS Trust Development Authority (now part of NHS Improvement), Department of Health and HM Treasury. The business case is written in the ‘five case model’ format1 set out by HM Treasury for major investments. We hope that in addition to addressing the strategic, economic, commercial, financial and management aspects of the case, it also provides a compelling story of the history of the Royal Sussex County Hospital site, the urgent need for investment to modernise the estate, and the vision for what it will mean for our patients once the redevelopment is complete. The £485m redevelopment received final approval from HM Treasury in December 2015. Clarifications and amendments made during the preceding due diligence/scrutiny process have been incorporated in this published version of the FBC, which is the third and final stage in the investment approvals process, and were regularly reported to and approved by the Trust Board of Directors. In fact, the case for investment remains largely unaltered from the Outline Business Case approved by the Department of Health in 2014, other than that the financial case has been updated to reflect the Trust and local health economy financial position as at 2015/16. Since planning began in 2008, there have been three national governments, four Secretaries of State, three Local Authority administrations, four Trust Chief Executives, and in 2013 the implementation of the Health & Social Care Act, which transformed the organisational architecture of the NHS in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 511 9 June 2010 No. 12 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 9 June 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 313 9 JUNE 2010 314 business organisations, to work out with them in respect House of Commons of each RDA the best way forward. I suspect that he and I have the same sort of concerns about the way in Wednesday 9 June 2010 which SEEDA has operated. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Chris Skidmore: While the excellent Frenchay hospital near my constituency was downgraded by the previous Government despite a 50,000-strong petition of local PRAYERS residents opposing the move, it was reported last year that the salaries of NHS quango bosses have increased [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] by up to 77% in the past three years. Does the Minister agree that this Government’s commitment to transparency and accountability will help to reduce that sort of cost to the taxpayer and will help to protect NHS front-line Oral Answers to Questions services? Mr Maude: First, I congratulate my hon. Friend on CABINET OFFICE the very vigorous campaign that he has fought and continues to fight in the interests of his constituents to The Minister for the Cabinet Office was asked— protect the work of the Frenchay hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton and Hove Lib Dems Letter To
    Brighton & Hove Liberal Democrats Chair: Michael Wilbur Please reply to: [email protected] 31st January 2017 To: Caroline Lucas, M.P. for Brighton Pavilion; Simon Kirby M.P. for Brighton Kemptown and Peter Kyle M.P. for Hove An open letter to the Members of Parliament for Brighton and Hove, Dear Caroline, Simon and Peter, We write to you to tell you about an initiative we have undertaken with other local Liberal Democrat activists amongst your constituents in our City. We have been promoting a petition with the following wording: ‘A narrow Leave vote does not give Theresa May a blank cheque to take away the UK's membership of the single market and our rights to live, work, and travel freely in Europe. If the Government won't give us a referendum on the destination of Brexit, we call on our three Brighton and Hove MPs to vote against the triggering of Article 50.’ We have collected hundreds of signatures already and we will continue to collect them until the very last minute before the final vote on Article 50 in the House of Commons. We acknowledge the work that Caroline Lucas and Peter Kyle have already done to prevent the worst form of ‘hard’ Brexit being forced through by a Conservative government that appears to have been ‘captured’ by its UKIP tendency. Caroline has spoken out and tabled several reasoned amendments to the Article 50 Bill that is currently being debated. Peter has also spoken forcefully for a Brexit that protects the benefits of being in the EU that are especially important to us in the city of Brighton and Hove.
    [Show full text]