Animal Protection Ordinance (Anipo) of 23 April 2008 (Status As at 1 March 2018)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Animal Protection Ordinance (Anipo) of 23 April 2008 (Status As at 1 March 2018) 455.1 English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is provided for information purposes only and has no legal force. Animal Protection Ordinance (AniPO) of 23 April 2008 (status as at 1 March 2018) The Swiss Federal Council, based on the Animal Protection Act of 16 December 20051 (AniPA), and on Article 19, paragraph 1 of the Gene Technology Act of 21 March 20032,3 decrees: Chapter 1: General Provisions Article 1 Scope This Ordinance regulates the handling, housing, use of, and interventions on verte- brates, cephalopods (Cephalopoda) and decapods (Reptantia). Article 2 Terms 1 A distinction is drawn between the following animal categories according to their domestication status: a. Domestic animals: domesticated animals of the equine4, bovine, porcine, ovine and caprine species, excluding exotic species; domesticated yaks and water buffalo; lamas and alpacas; domestic rabbits, dogs and cats; domestic pigeons and domestic poultry namely, domestic chickens, domestic turkeys, guinea fowl, domestic geese and ducks; b. Wild animals: vertebrates, except domestic animals, as well as cephalopods and decapods. AS 2008 2985 1 SR 455 2 SR 814.91 3 Amended by no. I of the Ordinance of 23 Oct. 2013, in force since 1 Jan. 2014 (AS 2013 3709). 4 Version in accordance with no. I of the Ordinance of 10 Jan. 2018, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 573). This amendment was made to the provisions stated in the AS (Official Compi- lation). 1 455.1 Protection of Nature, Landscape and Animals 2 A distinction is drawn between the following animal categories according to the nature of their use: a. Livestock: animals of species that are kept directly or indirectly for the pro- duction of food or other commodities or are intended for such use; b. Pets: animals that are kept out of interest in the animal or as a companion in the household or are intended for such use; c. Laboratory animals: animals that are used in animal experiments or are in- tended for use in animal experiments. 3 Within the meaning of this Ordinance, the following terms apply: a. Commercial purpose: trading in and keeping, looking after or breeding ani- mals with the intention of procuring an income or profit for oneself or for third parties or covering one’s own costs or the costs of third parties; the compen- sation does not have to be made in the form of money; b. Change of use: installation of a housing system in existing buildings, installa- tion of a housing system for animals of a different animal species or a different category of the same animal species or installation of a new housing system for animals of the same category; c. Outdoor access: free movement outdoors, where the animal can determine the nature, direction and speed of its own movement unimpeded by tethers, reins, leashes, harnesses, ropes, chains or the like; d. Box: enclosure in a room; e. Enclosure: bounded area in which animals are kept, including outdoor runs, cages, aviaries, terrariums, aquariums, rearing tanks and fish ponds; f. Outdoor run: pasture or other enclosed area designed for daily outdoor access in all weather conditions; g. Housing system: covered facilities, such as shelters, barns or huts, in which animals are kept or to which animals can retreat for protection from the weather; h. Kennel: outdoor enclosure with accommodation or a permanently accessible additional area in a building; i. Breeding: the mating of animals in order to achieve a specific selection objec- tive, reproduction without a selection objective and also the generation of an- imals using artificial reproduction methods; j. Breeding objective: expression of all inner and outer traits of an animal that are to be achieved through selection; k. Mutant having a clinical pathological phenotype: animal which, as a result of genetic predisposition, experiences pain or suffering, exhibits damage, lives in fear or suffers any other form of radical interference in its appearance or its capabilities; the stress-inducing mutation may occur spontaneously, be in- duced physically or chemically or also caused by genetic modification; 2 Animal Protection Ordinance 455.1 l. Line or strain having a clinical pathological phenotype: breeding lines or strains that include mutants having a clinical pathological phenotype or in the breeding of which animals are excessively instrumentalised; m. Laboratory animal facilities: animal housing unit in which laboratory animals are kept, bred or traded; n. Slaughter: killing of animals for the purpose of producing food; o. Use: 1. of equids: under-saddle work, groundwork or bridle work and also exer- cising with a horse walker, 2. of dogs: use for a purpose other than companionship for people, 3. of other animals: the commercial use of a product or a behavioural char- acteristic of the animal; p.5 Equids: domesticated animals of the genus Equus, i.e. horses, ponies, donkeys and mules; q.6 … r. Cattle: domesticated animals of the bovine species, including yaks and water buffalo; s. Animal shelter: animal housing unit where animals are given board and lodg- ing or abandoned and stray animals are looked after; t.7 Electronic information system for animal experiments: Information system in accordance with the Ordinance of 1 September 20108 on the Electronic Infor- mation System for the Administration of Animal Experiments; u.9 FSVO: Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office; v.10 Genetically modified animals: animals whose genetic material has been mod- ified in their germ cells by genetic engineering procedures as defined in Annex 1 of the Containment Ordinance of 9 May 201211 to an extent that does not occur under natural conditions as a result of cross-breeding or natural recom- bination; w.12 Decapods: crustaceans of the suborder Pleocyemata except the infraorders Stenopodidea and Caridea. 5 Amended by no. I of the Ordinance of 10 Jan. 2018, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 573). 6 Repealed by no. I of the Ordinance of 10 Jan. 2018, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 573). 7 Amended by no. I of the Ordinance of 23 Oct. 2013, in force since 1 Jan. 2014 (AS 2013 3709). 8 SR 455.61 9 Amended by no. I of the Ordinance of 23 Oct. 2013, in force since 1 Jan. 2014 (AS 2013 3709). 10 Inserted by no. I of the Ordinance of 10 Jan. 2018, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 573). 11 SR 814.912 12 Inserted by no. I of the Ordinance of 10 Jan. 2018, in force since 1 March 2018 3 455.1 Protection of Nature, Landscape and Animals 4 The terms Alpine pasturing region, Mountain region and Standard labour unit are to be understood within the meaning of agricultural legislation. 5 New buildings or buildings that have undergone a change of use, as well as new additions or extensions to existing buildings, are regarded in this Ordinance as newly installed facilities. Chapter 2: Housing and Handling of Animals 13 Section 1: General Provisions Article 3 Basic principles14 1 Animals must be kept in a manner that does not interfere with their bodily functions or their behaviour, nor overtax their capacity to adapt.15 2 Housing systems and enclosures must be fitted with suitable feeding, drinking and dunging areas, places to rest and withdraw under cover, opportunities to perform ex- ploratory behaviour, grooming facilities and different climatic zones. 3 Feeding and care are suitable if, according to existing experience and current knowledge concerning physiology, animal behaviour and hygiene, they meet the ani- mals' needs. 4 Animals must not be kept permanently tethered. Article 4 Feeding 1 Animals must be regularly and adequately supplied with suitable feed and water. If animals are kept in groups, the animal keeper must ensure that every animal receives sufficient feed and water. 2 Animals must be able to perform species-specific foraging behaviour. 3 Live animals can only be fed to wild animals. This is subject to the condition that the wild animal shows normal catching and killing behaviour and: a. the wild animal’s nutrition cannot be provided by dead animals or other feed; b. reintroduction to the wild is planned; or c. the wild animals and the prey animals are kept in a shared enclosure, which must also be set up to meet the needs of the prey animal. (AS 2018 573). 13 Amended by no. I of the Ordinance of 23 Oct. 2013, in force since 1 Jan. 2014 (AS 2013 3709). 14 Amended by no. I of the Ordinance of 23 Oct. 2013, in force since 1 Jan. 2014 (AS 2013 3709). 15 Amended by no. I of the Ordinance of 23 Oct. 2013, in force since 1 Jan. 2014 (AS 2013 3709). 4 Animal Protection Ordinance 455.1 Article 5 Care 1 The animal keeper must check the welfare of the animals and of the facilities as often as necessary. He or she must immediately correct any deficiencies of the facili- ties that impair the well-being of the animals or take appropriate action to protect the animals. 2 The care provided should prevent diseases and injuries. The animal keeper is re- sponsible for ensuring that sick or injured animals are housed, cared for and treated without delay or euthanized according to their condition. The facilities required for this must be available as needed within a useful time frame. It must be possible to safely restrain the animals for veterinary or other treatments. 3 The housing conditions must not unnecessarily restrict species-specific grooming behaviour. If it is restricted, substitute care must be provided. 4 Hoofs, claws and nails must be regularly and properly looked after and clipped as necessary.
Recommended publications
  • Influence of Habitat and Predation on Population Dynamics of the Freshwater Turtle Myuchelys Georgesi
    Herpetologica, 69(1), 2013, 46–57 Ó 2013 by The Herpetologists’ League, Inc. INFLUENCE OF HABITAT AND PREDATION ON POPULATION DYNAMICS OF THE FRESHWATER TURTLE MYUCHELYS GEORGESI 1,2,4 1,3 SEAN J. BLAMIRES AND RICKY-JOHN SPENCER 1School of Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. 2Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, 181 Section 3, Taichung-kan Road, Taichung City, Taiwan 407-04, R.O.C. 3School of Science and Health, Wildlife and Aquatic Ecology Group (Native and Pest Animal Unit), University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia ABSTRACT: Demographic models identify whether animals are vulnerable to local extirpation, but including all ecological parameters across life history stages may be impeded by practical difficulties. When processes acting on certain life stages cannot be measured, extrapolations are often made. A previous study documented that the range of the turtle Myuchelys georgesi is restricted to the Bellinger River, New South Wales, Australia, and its population is stable. We assessed whether M. georgesi selects certain habitats by comparing their distribution among different water holes. We assessed the threat of catfish predation by examining the stomach contents of catfish specimens. We then evaluated whether threats to M. georgesi were likely to have been underestimated by extending our previous demographic model. We did this by revising the previous estimates of adult, juvenile, and hatchling survivorship under hypothetical variations in water hole use and in the presence or absence of catfish predators. We found that M. georgesi preferentially uses moderate to deep water holes. We also found that although catfish 250À400 mm consume hatchling or juvenile turtles, those .
    [Show full text]
  • Manual for the Differentiation of Captive-Produced and Wild-Caught Turtles and Tortoises (Testudines)
    Image: Peter Paul van Dijk Image:Henrik Bringsøe Image: Henrik Bringsøe Image: Andrei Daniel Mihalca Image: Beate Pfau MANUAL F O R T H E DIFFERENTIATION OF CAPTIVE-PRODUCED AND WILD-CAUGHT TURTLES AND TORTOISES (TESTUDINES) PREPARED BY SPECIES360 UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE CITES SECRETARIAT Manual for the differentiation of captive-produced and wild-caught turtles and tortoises (Testudines) This document was prepared by Species360 under contract for the CITES Secretariat. Principal Investigators: Prof. Dalia A. Conde, Ph.D. and Johanna Staerk, Ph.D., Species360 Conservation Science Alliance, https://www.species360.orG Authors: Johanna Staerk1,2, A. Rita da Silva1,2, Lionel Jouvet 1,2, Peter Paul van Dijk3,4,5, Beate Pfau5, Ioanna Alexiadou1,2 and Dalia A. Conde 1,2 Affiliations: 1 Species360 Conservation Science Alliance, www.species360.orG,2 Center on Population Dynamics (CPop), Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark, 3 The Turtle Conservancy, www.turtleconservancy.orG , 4 Global Wildlife Conservation, globalwildlife.orG , 5 IUCN SSC Tortoise & Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, www.iucn-tftsG.org. 6 Deutsche Gesellschaft für HerpetoloGie und Terrarienkunde (DGHT) Images (title page): First row, left: Mixed species shipment (imaGe taken by Peter Paul van Dijk) First row, riGht: Wild Testudo marginata from Greece with damaGe of the plastron (imaGe taken by Henrik BrinGsøe) Second row, left: Wild Testudo marginata from Greece with minor damaGe of the carapace (imaGe taken by Henrik BrinGsøe) Second row, middle: Ticks on tortoise shell (Amblyomma sp. in Geochelone pardalis) (imaGe taken by Andrei Daniel Mihalca) Second row, riGht: Testudo graeca with doG bite marks (imaGe taken by Beate Pfau) Acknowledgements: The development of this manual would not have been possible without the help, support and guidance of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Evolutionary History of the Australian Freshwater Turtles Chelodina Expansa and Chelodina Longicollis
    Recent evolutionary history of the Australian freshwater turtles Chelodina expansa and Chelodina longicollis. by Kate Meredith Hodges B.Sc. (Hons) ANU, 2004 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences Department of Genetics and Evolution The University of Adelaide December, 2015 Kate Hodges with Chelodina (Macrochelodina) expansa from upper River Murray. Photo by David Thorpe, Border Mail. i Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library catalogue and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for The
    Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (Myuchelys georgesi) December, 2016 1 Workshop participants. Back row (l to r): Ricky Spencer, Bruce Chessman, Kristen Petrov, Caroline Lees, Gerald Kuchling, Jane Hall, Gerry McGilvray, Shane Ruming, Karrie Rose, Larry Vogelnest, Arthur Georges; Front row (l to r) Michael McFadden, Adam Skidmore, Sam Gilchrist, Bruno Ferronato, Richard Jakob-Hoff © Copyright 2017 CBSG IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Jakob-Hoff, R. Lees C. M., McGilvray G, Ruming S, Chessman B, Gilchrist S, Rose K, Spencer R, Hall J (Eds) (2017). Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle. IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Cover photo: Juvenile Bellinger River Snapping Turtle © 2016 Brett Vercoe This report can be downloaded from the CBSG website: www.cbsg.org. 2 Executive Summary The Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (BRST) (Myuchelys georgesi) is a freshwater turtle endemic to a 60 km stretch of the Bellinger River, and possibly a portion of the nearby Kalang River in coastal north eastern New South Wales (NSW).
    [Show full text]
  • Ve-Nr-01-Es.Pdf
    MINISTERIO DEL AMBIENTE Y DE LOS RECURSOS NATURALES En el mes de junio de 1992, en el marco de la Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, Venezuela suscribió el Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica, el cual fue ratificado por el entonces Congreso de la República en el año 1994 por lo que es una ley aprobatoria. La aplicación de este Convenio significó un cambio conceptual al reconocer a los Estados sus derechos soberanos sobre los recursos biológicos, y al declarar la conservación de la diversidad biológica como patrimonio de la humanidad e impuso a las Partes contratantes un conjunto de obligaciones entre las que se encuentra la elaboración del “Informe de País” que hoy presentamos ante la Conferencia de las Partes. En este sentido, y atendiendo los lineamientos establecidos sobre el contenido y presentación del informe, se ha preparado un documento que incluye un estudio sobre la magnitud de la diversidad biológica presente en el país, que lo hace uno de los diez primeros países megadiversos del planeta condición que nos obliga en el conocimiento, conservación y uso sustentable de tan valioso recurso para el futuro de la humanidad. Consideramos importante resaltar que en la recién promulgada Constitución de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela se establece como una obligación de Estado la conservación y defensa de la Diversidad Biológica y a demás se reconoce el valor de los conocimientos ancestrales que poseen las comunidades indígenas, sobre la biodiversidad presente en las tierras que ocupan por lo que tendrán derecho a obtener beneficios derivados de la utilización de sus conocimientos tradicionales.
    [Show full text]
  • Quelônios Amazônicos
    Manejo Conservacionista e Monitoramento Populacional de Quelônios Amazônicos Ministério do Meio Ambiente Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis Diretoria de Uso Sustentável de Biodiversidade e Florestas Coordenação de Fauna Silvestre Manejo Conservacionista e Monitoramento Populacional de Quelônios Amazônicos Brasília, 2016 Manejo conservacionista e monitoramento populacional de quelônios amazônicos MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE COORDENAÇÃO-GERAL DE AUTORIZAÇÃO DE USO E GESTÃO DE FAUNA E RECURSOS José Sarney Filho PESQUEIROS João Pessoa Riograndense Moreira Júnior SECRETARIA DE BIODIVERSIDADE E FLORESTAS José Pedro de Oliveira Costa COORDENAÇÃO DE FAUNA SILVESTRE Iria de Souza Pinto DEPARTAMENTO DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO Ugo Eichler Vercillo DA BIODIVERSIDADE Rômulo Mello INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DO MEIO AMBIENTE E DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS RENOVÁVEIS DIRETORIA DE PESQUISA, AVALIAÇÃO E MONITORAMENTO DA BIODIVERSIDADE Suely Mara Vaz Guimarães de Aráujo Marcelo Marcelino de Oliveira DIRETORIA DE USO SUSTENTÁVEL DA COORDENAÇÃO-GERAL DE MANEJO PARA BIODIVERSIDADE E FLORESTAS CONSERVAÇÃO Ana Alice Biedzicki de Marques Rosana Junqueira Subirá CENTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA E CONSERVA- ÇÃO DE RÉPTEIS E ANFÍBIOS Vera Lúcia Ferreira Luz 2 Ministério do Meio Ambiente Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis Diretoria de Uso Sustentável de Biodiversidade e Florestas Coordenação de Fauna Silvestre Manejo Conservacionista e Monitoramento Populacional de Quelônios Amazônicos Brasília, 2016 Manejo conservacionista e monitoramento populacional de quelônios amazônicos ORGANIZADOR FOTOS GENTILMENTE CEDIDAS Rafael Antônio Machado Balestra Acervo Técnico do RAN Acervo Técnico do Projeto Pé-de-Pincha REVISORES TÉCNICOS Acervo Técnico do INPA Camila Rudge Ferrara Acervo Técnico do Programa Quelônios da Amazônia José Roberto Moreira Ana Paula Gomes Lustosa Rafael Antônio Machado Balestra Camila Rudge Ferrara Rafael Bernhard José Roberto Moreira Richard C.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving the Phylogenetic History of the Short-Necked Turtles, Genera
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68 (2013) 251–258 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Resolving the phylogenetic history of the short-necked turtles, genera Elseya and Myuchelys (Testudines: Chelidae) from Australia and New Guinea ⇑ Minh Le a,b,c, , Brendan N. Reid d, William P. McCord e, Eugenia Naro-Maciel f, Christopher J. Raxworthy c, George Amato g, Arthur Georges h a Department of Environmental Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Science, Hanoi University of Science, VNU, 334 Nguyen Trai Road, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Viet Nam b Centre for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, VNU, 19 Le Thanh Tong Street, Hanoi, Viet Nam c Department of Herpetology, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA d Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA e East Fishkill Animal Hospital, 455 Route 82, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, USA f Biology Department, College of Staten Island, City University of New York, Staten Island, NY 10314, USA g Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA h Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia article info abstract Article history: Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy of the short-necked turtles of the genera Elseya, Myuchelys, and Received 15 October 2012 Emydura in Australia and New Guinea have long been debated as a result of conflicting hypotheses sup- Revised 14 March 2013 ported by different data sets and phylogenetic analyses. To resolve this contentious issue, we analyzed Accepted 24 March 2013 sequences from two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome b and ND4) and one nuclear intron gene (R35) from Available online 4 April 2013 all species of the genera Elseya, Myuchelys, Emydura, and their relatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Determination
    NSW SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Preliminary Determination The Scientific Committee, established by the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (the Act), has made a Preliminary Determination to support a proposal to list the Western Sawshelled Turtle Myuchelys bellii (Gray, 1844) as an ENDANGERED SPECIES in Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Act, and as a consequence, to omit reference to Bell’s Turtle Myucheles belli (Gray, 1844) from Part 1 of Schedule 2 (Vulnerable species) of the Act. Listing of Endangered species is provided for by Part 2 of the Act. The Scientific Committee has found that: 1. The Western Sawshelled Turtle Myuchelys bellii (Gray, 1844) (family Chelidae) is a medium- sized freshwater chelid turtle, reaching a maximum straight line carapace size of ~230 mm in males and ~300 mm in females (Cogger 2014; Chessman 2015). Cogger (2014) describes this species as “similar in most respect to [the Saw-Shelled Turtle Myuchelys latisternum] Wollumbinia latisternum. Like the latter it is brown above, whitish below, the two colours usually forming a sharply defined line on the side of the face and throat at the level of the angle of the jaws. Usually a distinct yellow stripe from the angle of the jaws, especially in the young. Shell above broadly oval, expanded posteriorly, with a serrated hind edge, except in larger specimens. Plaston moderate, nearly twice as long as broad, the front and rear lobes tapering from the bridge. Intergular shield as wide as or wider than each gular shield. Neck above with conspicuous sharp pointed tubercles. No alveolar ridge on the maxilla. Macrocephaly does not occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Conservation Translocation Perspectives: 2021. Case Studies from Around the Globe
    Global conservation Global conservation translocation perspectives: 2021 translocation perspectives: 2021 IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group Global conservation translocation perspectives: 2021 Case studies from around the globe Edited by Pritpal S. Soorae IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group (CTSG) i The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or any of the funding organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. IUCN is pleased to acknowledge the support of its Framework Partners who provide core funding: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark; Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland; Government of France and the French Development Agency (AFD); the Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea; the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the United States Department of State. Published by: IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group, Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi & Calgary Zoo, Canada. Copyright: © 2021 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Soorae, P. S.
    [Show full text]
  • TCF Summary Activity Report 2002–2018
    Turtle Conservation Fund • Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 Turtle Conservation Fund A Partnership Coalition of Leading Turtle Conservation Organizations and Individuals Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 1 Turtle Conservation Fund • Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 Recommended Citation: Turtle Conservation Fund [Rhodin, A.G.J., Quinn, H.R., Goode, E.V., Hudson, R., Mittermeier, R.A., and van Dijk, P.P.]. 2019. Turtle Conservation Fund: A Partnership Coalition of Leading Turtle Conservation Organi- zations and Individuals—Summary Activity Report 2002–2018. Lunenburg, MA and Ojai, CA: Chelonian Research Foundation and Turtle Conservancy, 54 pp. Front Cover Photo: Radiated Tortoise, Astrochelys radiata, Cap Sainte Marie Special Reserve, southern Madagascar. Photo by Anders G.J. Rhodin. Back Cover Photo: Yangtze Giant Softshell Turtle, Rafetus swinhoei, Dong Mo Lake, Hanoi, Vietnam. Photo by Timothy E.M. McCormack. Printed by Inkspot Press, Bennington, VT 05201 USA. Hardcopy available from Chelonian Research Foundation, 564 Chittenden Dr., Arlington, VT 05250 USA. Downloadable pdf copy available at www.turtleconservationfund.org 2 Turtle Conservation Fund • Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 Turtle Conservation Fund A Partnership Coalition of Leading Turtle Conservation Organizations and Individuals Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 by Anders G.J. Rhodin, Hugh R. Quinn, Eric V. Goode, Rick Hudson, Russell A. Mittermeier, and Peter Paul van Dijk Strategic Action Planning and Funding Support for Conservation of Threatened Tortoises and Freshwater
    [Show full text]
  • Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae
    Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 101(5): 555-558, August 2006 555 A new Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae), possessing mitra- shaped oocysts, from the Neotropical chelid turtle Batrachemys heliostemma (Testudines: Chelidae), and its comparison with Eimeria mitraria (Laveran & Mesnil 1902) Pavel Široký/+, Martin Kamler*, David Modrý*/** Department of Biology and Wildlife Diseases *Department of Parasitology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého 1-3, CZ-612 42 Brno, Czech Republic **Institute of Parasitology, Biological Center, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Èeské Budì jovice, Czech Republic Eimeria jirkamoraveci sp. n. is described from faeces of two specimens of the toad-headed, side-necked turtle Batrachemys heliostemma collected at Iquitos in Peru. Oocysts are ovoid to almost spherical, 10.6 (8-12) × 8.9 (7-10) µm, without micropyle, polar granule and oocyst residuum. One conically stretched end and three blunt conical tubercles at the opposite end of oocyst give it mitra-like appearance. Sporocysts are elongated, ellipsoidal, 7.2 (6-8) × 4.1 (4-4.5) µm, with a small, knob-like Stieda body and sporocyst residuum composed of fine granules. To avoid possible conspecificity, the described new species is thoroughly compared with the most similar coccidium, E. mitraria, collected from its type host, Chinemys reevesii. Key words: Coccidia - Apicomplexa - Eimeria jirkamoraveci sp. n. - turtles - Batrachemys - Peru Batrachemys heliostemma McCord, Joseph-Ouni & We had an opportunity to examine the faeces of two Lamar, 2001 is a Neotropical chelid turtle described re- specimens of Batrachemys heliostemma collected at cently from the upper Amazon basin, with distribution Iquitos and found a new Eimeria possessing mitra-shaped ranging from Southern Venezuela, Western Brazil, to Peru, oocysts, described and named in this paper.
    [Show full text]