DOCSLIB.ORG

The United States and the Northeastern Fisheries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The United States and the Northeastern Fisheries This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. http://books.google.com u' .. .' . e m a [ .Vj S H -V 5 Jtl E -WiND -3 o V TH . DANIELS-FEARING NEWPORT- R- 1- HARVARD • COLLEGE -LIBRARY GIFT OF DANIEL B FEARING CLASS'OP-l882 : A AA 1911 OF-NEWPORT 1915 THIS BooK 15 NOT TO BE-SOLD OR j THE UNIVERSITY OE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE UNITED STATES AND THE NORTHEASTERN FISHERIES A HISTORY OF THE FISHERY QUESTION HV CHARLES B. ELLIOTT, LL. B. MINNEAPOLIS UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1887 BOSTON DAMRELL & UPHAM ilje ©It) Corner foohstort 283 Washington Street THE UNITED STATES AND THE NORTHEASTERN FISHERIES " The public prints hold forth the importance of the fisheries. The reigning toast in the East is, 'May the United States ever maintain their rights to the fisheries.' " M. Marbois to Count de Vergennes, March 13, 1782. "The Fisheries or the Mississippi, — the two great objects of the Union." Gouverneur Morris in Constitutional Convention of 1887. THE UNITED STATES NORTHEASTERN FISHERIES A HISTORY OF THE FISHERY QUESTION BY CHARLES B. ELLIOTT, LL. B. MINNEAPOLIS THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1887 .2* HARVARD COLLEGE LIBRARY GIFT OF DANIEL B. FiTARING 30 JUNE 1915 CoPYRIGHT BY CHARLES B. ELLIOTT 1887 W. T. COLE * CO. Kite Hltittt«r* MINNEAPOLIS This paper was prepared and presented to the Faculty of the University of Minnesota as part of the work of a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. I am indebted to the late Prof. John Norton Pomeroy for the greater part of the translations from French writers on inter national law, and to the officials of the Department of State at Washington for their courtesy in allowing me access to the library and archives of that Department. Nov. 21, 1887. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION -------- 9 PART I — HISTORICAL ACQUISITION OF THE NORTHEASTERN FISHERIES - 15 THE FISHERIES AND THE REVOLUTION - - - 21 THE TREATY OF 1783 26 THE FISHERIES AT THE CLOSE OF THE REVOLUTION - 40 DIFFERENT CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE TREATY OF 1783 44 THE NEGOTIATIONS AT GHENT ----- 50 THE TREATY OF 1818 ...... (jy THE RECIPROCITY TREATY OF 1854 74 THE TREATY OF WASHINGTON ----- 79 TEMPORARY DIPLOMATIC ARRAGEMENT 89 PRESENT STATE OF THE QUESTION 90 PART II— THE TREATY OF 1818 IN GENERAL -------- 103 RULES OF CONSTRUCTION ------ 105 FISHING RIGHTS OK AMERICAN CITIZENS - - - 105 In Deep Sea — The Three Mile Limit - - - 106 In Territorial Waters - - - - - - 116 RIGHT TO ENTER HARBORS AND BAYS FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN FISHING - - - - - 117 To Dry and Cure Fish - - - - - 117 To Obtain Shelter, Wood and Water - - 1 18 To Procure Bait, Prepare to Fish, &c. - - - 119 COMMERCIAL PRIVILEGES - 122 THE RIGHT TO NAVIGATE THE GUT OF CANSO - - 127 PROVINCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF A TREATY - - 129 CONCLUSION - - - - - - - 130 PRINCIPAL AUTHORITIES ------ 135 APPENDIX THE UNITED STATES AND THE NORTH EASTERN FISHERIES. INTRODUCTION. AT seemingly regular intervals in the history of the United States, the question of the extent of the rights of American fish ermen to gather the "harvests of the sea" along the northeastern shores of the British North American Provinces has appeared as a disturbing element of international harmony. It is one of the few unsettled questions connected with the foreign relations of the United States which may at some future time lead to war between the two great English speaking nations of the world. From its nature it is peculiarly liable to be the cause of ill- feeling between the parties directly interested. The United States throws its arm along the northeastern coasts and holds certain peculiar territorial rights on the shores of a foreign na tion. Her subjects, while pursuing their occupation, are thus brought into direct personal contact with the subjects of such foreign nation engaged in the same occupation, and naturally jealous of what seem to them foreign interference and compe tition. Conflicting interests under such circumstances are liable to lead to collisions which render negotiations between the re spective nations difficult. Each nation recognizes the import ance of its fisheries. It has been the policy of every maritime country to give this industry government protection. Fisher men are the wards of nations. To them have been universally granted certain extraordinary privileges and exemptions in times of war. IO THE UNITED STATES AND The fisheries are the nurseries of seamen, "the great foun tains of commercial prosperity and naval power," from which are drawn skilled and hardy sailors to man ships of war in time of need. They nurture and train a reserve force for the navies of the world. Hence they have always been fostered and encouraged. From an economic point of view the fisheries are of equal importance. Countless thousands receive from them their chief article of food. " The commercial products obtained from the sea are more numerous and important than would be generally supposed by those who have not looked closely into the matter. To a great part of the civilized world the taking of the cod, the herring, the salmon, the mackerel, the sardine, the seal, and other fishes, is of great value and gives employment to hundreds of thousands of persons. The oil obtained from the seal, cod, shark, &c., is used for lamps, medicine and in industry. Many parts of fish are employed in the arts and manufactures: as, the scales of the bleak for making false pearls, and those of other fish for making ornaments; the skins of the seals and por poises for tanning purposes. Isinglass is obtained from the air or swimming bladders of many. Fish roes are not only used as fish delicacies, but also for bait in some fishing grounds, and ex cellent guano is made from the offal and the bones of fish. The sea is more abundantly stocked with living creatures than the land. In all parts of the world a rocky and partially protected shore perhaps supports in a given space a greater number of in dividual animals than any other station. The sea is filled with animals of several kinds, and each layer of water in depth seems to have its own varieties, thus resem bling the changes which take place according to elevation in the organized portions of the land." ' The supreme importance of these northeastern fisheries to thousands of citizens of the United States who live along the eastern shores can hardly be appreciated by their fellow citizens living inland. Generation after generation of these people have followed the same hardy occupation. Year after year from the time when their ancestors first visited the bleak coasts 1 " Commercial Products of the Sea," by P. L. Simmons, quoted in Joncas on Fisheries, in "Canadian Economics," p. 72. THE NORTHEASTERN FISHERIES. II they have made the same annual voyage. Millions of dollars are invested in the business. The right to participate . in these fisheries has always been claimed by them and its justness can not be controverted. The absolute right of a Gloucester fisher man to take fish off the Canadian coast, subject to the treaty restrictions made by his government, rests on the same title as American right to the soil of Bunker Hill. The "fishery question" was intimately connected with the early history of the United States. The men who signed the Treaty of Paris, in 1783, thought that they had forever placed beyond question the rights and liberties of citizens of the new nation in the fisheries. Every generation of American statesmen can bear testimony to their error. In one form or another the fishery dispute has always been before the public. It is a nut which our State Depart ment has been attempting to crack for more than a hundred years, and the only result is the hardening of the shell. It is true that the relative importance of the fisheries has de creased amid the diverse and multiform pursuits of modern commercial and industrial life, until, as compared with the whole, they are of small importance. But it is equally true that the importance of an international question is not governed solely by the number of dollars involved. The difficulty is not about " a few fish " but about the true construction of a treaty, and the duty of one civilized nation towards the citizens of another. PART I HISTORICAL THE ACQUISITION OF THE NORTHEASTERN FISHERIES. In order to understand the fishery question it is necessary to trace its history and to consider the important position it has oc cupied in the history of the nation and of the States and Provinces situated on the Atlantic coast. Before the division of the British Empire by the successful revolt of the North American colonies, the valuable fisheries along the eastern and northeastern coasts of the continent were the property of the Empire, open to the free and common use of all its citizens. The history of the northeastern fisheries dates back to a time soon after the discovery of America. They were known to, the Normans and Biscay ans as early as the year 1504, and, for almost a century before any attempt was made at colonization, these adventurous toilers of the sea pursued their perilous calling on the shores of the island of Newfoundland and the adjacent mainland. ' In 1517 fifty ships were engaged in the Newfoundland fish eries, and in 1577 the French fishermen employed one hundred fifty vessels." 1 The first to use these fisheries were the Basques (the people of Nor mandy and Brittany). According to Pe're Fournier the Basques were busy drawing cod from the water and had given the name Barsalaos, or Codlands, to Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and Cape Breton.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Constitution in Congress: Substantive Issues in the First Congress, 1789-1791 David P
    The University of Chicago Law Review VOLUME 61 NUMBER 3 SUMMER 1994 of Chicago © 1994 by The University The Constitution in Congress: Substantive Issues in the First Congress, 1789-1791 David P. Curriet Judicial review of legislative and executive action has been such a success in the United States that we tend to look exclu- sively to the courts for guidance in interpreting the Constitution. The stock of judicial precedents is rich, accessible, and familiar, but it does not exhaust the relevant materials. Members of Congress and executive officers, no less than judges, swear to uphold the Constitution, and they interpret it every day in making and applying the law.' Like judges, they often engage in t Edward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor and Interim Dean, The University of Chicago Law School. The author wishes to thank the Kirkland & Ellis Faculty Research Fund, the Mayer, Brown & Platt Faculty Research Fund, the Morton C. Seeley Fund, the Raymond & Nancy Goodman Feldman Fund, and the Sonnenschein Faculty Research Fund for financial support; Charlene Bangs Bickford, Kenneth R. Bowling, and Helen E. Veit of the First Federal Congress Project for access to hitherto unpublished reports of the debates; Kenneth Bowling, Gerhard Casper, Richard Posner, and Richard Ross for invalu- able advice and encouragement; and Keith Garza for exemplary research assistance. ' "M[T]he whole business of Legislation," said Representative Theodore Sedgwick in 1791, "was a practical construction of the powers of the Legislature. ." Gales & Seaton, eds, 2 Annals of Congress 1960 (1791) ("Annals"). See generally Frank H. Easterbrook, PresidentialReview, 40 Case W Res L Rev 905 (1989-90); Jefferson Powell, ed, Languages of Power: A Source Book of Early American ConstitutionalHistory xi-xii (Carolina Aca- demic Press, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code RL30665 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Role of the House Majority Leader: An Overview Updated April 4, 2006 Walter J. Oleszek Senior Specialist in the Legislative Process Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The Role of the House Majority Leader: An Overview Summary The majority leader in the contemporary House is second-in-command behind the Speaker of the majority party. Typically, the majority leader functions as the Speaker’s chief lieutenant or “field commander” for day-to-day management of the floor. Although the majority leader’s duties are not especially well-defined, they have evolved to the point where it is possible to spotlight two fundamental and often interlocking responsibilities that orient the majority leader’s work: institutional and party. From an institutional perspective, the majority leader has a number of duties. Scheduling floor business is a prime responsibility of the majority leader. Although scheduling the House’s business is a collective activity of the majority party, the majority leader has a large say in shaping the chamber’s overall agenda and in determining when, whether, how, or in what order legislation is taken up. In addition, the majority leader is active in constructing winning coalitions for the party’s legislative priorities; acting as a public spokesman — defending and explaining the party’s program and agenda; serving as an emissary to the White House, especially when the President is of the same party; and facilitating the orderly conduct of the House’s business. From a party perspective, three key activities undergird the majority leader’s principal goal of trying to ensure that the party remains in control of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • American Political Thought
    AMERICAN POLITICAL THOUGHT 00-Whittington-FM.indd 1 28/10/15 5:50 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 159102 Cust: OUP Au: Whittington Pg. No. i K S4CARLISLE Title: American Political Thought 1e Short / Normal Publishing Services 00-Whittington-FM.indd 2 28/10/15 5:50 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 159102 Cust: OUP Au: Whittington Pg. No. ii K S4CARLISLE Title: American Political Thought 1e Short / Normal Publishing Services AMERICAN POLITICAL THOUGHT READINGS AND MATERIALS Keith E. Whittington PRINCETON UNIVERSITY NEW YORK OXFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 00-Whittington-FM.indd 3 28/10/15 5:50 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 159102 Cust: OUP Au: Whittington Pg. No. iii K S4CARLISLE Title: American Political Thought 1e Short / Normal Publishing Services Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2017 by Oxford University Press For titles covered by Section 112 of the US Higher Education Opportunity Act, please visit www.oup.com/us/he for the latest information about pricing and alternate formats. Published by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 http://www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffersons Rivals: the Shifting Character of the Federalists 23
    jeffersons rivals: the shifting character of the federalists roberf mccolley Our first national political association, after the revolutionary patriots, was the Federalist Party, which controlled the Federal government for twelve years, and then dwindled rapidly away. Within its brief career this Federalist Party managed to go through three quite distinct phases, each of which revealed a different composition of members and of principles. While these are visible enough in the detailed histories of the early na­ tional period, they have not been clearly marked in our textbooks. An appreciation of the distinctness of each phase should reduce some of the confusion about what the party stood for in the 1790's, where Jeffersonians have succeeded in attaching to it the reactionary social philosophy of Hamilton. Furthermore, an identification of the leading traits of Feder­ alism in each of its three phases will clarify the corresponding traits in the opposition to Federalism. i. federalism as nationalism, 1785-1789 The dating of this phase is arbitrary, but defensible. Programs for strengthening the Articles of Confederation were a favorite subject of political men before Yorktown. In 1785 a national movement began to form. Several delegates met in that year at Mount Vernon to negotiate commercial and territorial conflicts between Virginia and Maryland. In­ formally but seriously they also discussed the problem of strengthening the national government. These men joined with nationally minded lead­ ers from other states to bring on the concerted movement for a new Constitution.1 The interesting questions raised by Charles Beard about the motives of these Federalists have partly obscured their leading concerns, and the scholarship of Merrill Jensen has perhaps clarified the matter less than it should have.
    [Show full text]
  • Artemas Ward and the Politics of the New Nation
    ARTEMAS WARD AND THE POLITICS OF THE NEW NATION By MARION RAY McCULLAR /I / Bachelor of Arts Central State University Edmond, Oklahoma 1967 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS July, 1972 WI\U\ffl11W1 " IMTI UfflVERfll] 'tRRARY FEB 6 1973 ARTEMAS WARD AND THE POLITICS OF THE NEW NATION Thesis Approved: ii PREFACE The po1;i.tics of the young republic were marked by the fear of an all powerful government on the one han~ and by anxieties that govern­ ment might have insufficient power on the other. This ambivalence not only divided Congress but created inner tensions within the members themselves as to how to achieve a proper balance. The national politi­ cal career of Artemas Ward provides a particularly illuminating example of that tension. After a long career in provincial politics, Ward moved into the national political circle at a time when greater powers for the Congress were deemed by many as essential to the further prosecution of the Revolution. An ardent patriot, Ward was also fiercely devoted to the preservation of a social order in Massachusetts which he believed would be destroyed by either over-centralization or public licentiousness. The resolution of the conflict between these two extremes in the political career of Artemas Ward elucidates one important facet of the politics of the new nation. I owe a special debt of gratitude to my advisor, Professor H. James Henderson, who generously gave of his time and knowledge to help me in every stage of research and writing of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vice-Presidency and the Problems of Presidential Succession and Inability
    Fordham Law Review Volume 32 Issue 3 Article 2 1964 The Vice-Presidency and the Problems of Presidential Succession and Inability John D. Feerick Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John D. Feerick, The Vice-Presidency and the Problems of Presidential Succession and Inability, 32 Fordham L. Rev. 457 (1964). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol32/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Vice-Presidency and the Problems of Presidential Succession and Inability Cover Page Footnote Member of the New York Bar; member, American Bar Association Conference on Presidential Inability and Succession. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol32/iss3/2 THE VICE-PRESIDENCY AND THE PROBLEMS OF PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSION AND INABILITY JOHN D. FEERICK* In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Offi e, tile Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice Presi- dent, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Offlcer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.' THE orderly transfer of power to President Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalist Politics and the Unitarian Controversy Marc M
    Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship Winter 2002 The orF ce of Ancient Manners: Federalist Politics and the Unitarian Controversy Marc M. Arkin Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Marc M. Arkin, The Force of Ancient Manners: Federalist Politics and the Unitarian Controversy, 22 J. of the Early Republic 575 (2002) Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/716 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FORCE OF ANCIENT MANNERS: FEDERALIST POLITICS AND THE UNITARIAN CONTROVERSY REVISITED Marc M. Arkin Some of our mutual friends say all is lost-nothing can be done. Nothing is to be done rashly, but mature counsels and united efforts are necessary in the most forlorn case. For though we may not do much to save ourselves, the vicissitudes of political fortune may do every thing-and we ought to be ready when she smiles.1 As 1804 drew to a close, Massachusetts Federalists could be forgiven for thinking that it had been a very bad year, the latest among many.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionalism and the Religion Clauses: the Contribution of Fisher Ames
    Buffalo Law Review Volume 47 Number 2 Article 2 4-1-1999 Regionalism and the Religion Clauses: The Contribution of Fisher Ames Marc M. Arkin Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview Part of the Legal History Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Marc M. Arkin, Regionalism and the Religion Clauses: The Contribution of Fisher Ames, 47 Buff. L. Rev. 763 (1999). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol47/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regionalism and the Religion Clauses: The Contribution of Fisher Ames MARC M. ARKINt INTRODUCTION On August 20, 1789, Massachusetts Federalist Fisher Ames rose to address the House of Representatives in one of his rare contributions to the debate on the Bill of Rights.' The day before, sitting as a Committee of the Whole, the House had concluded its brief discussion of the proposed religion amendment to the federal Constitution by agreeing to New Hampshire Representative Samuel Livermore's formula that "Congress shall make no laws touching religion, or infringing t Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law. I would like to thank Martin Flaherty, Philip Hamburger, Douglas Laycock, Henry Monaghan, Edward Purcell, Jack Rakove, Conrad E. Wright, and most especially; Michael Martin for their comments on earlier versions of this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Dedham Village a Self-Guided Walking Tour a Brief History of Dedham Walking Tour Dedham Was Founded in 1636 by a Handful of Families from Watertown
    Historic Dedham Village A Self-guided Walking Tour A Brief History of Dedham Walking tour Dedham was founded in 1636 by a handful of families from Watertown. It was one of The tour takes about an hour to complete (though there are a few shortcuts if you’re the first inland settlements by the new English colony to provide land for a growing pressed for time). The tour route is accessible for strollers and wheelchairs. population and protection from the Dutch and the Pequot tribe in Connecticut. The settlers called the area “Contentment” and were known for their unwavering faith, 1. 612 High St., Dedham Historical Society signing a covenant to live “in Christian love and charity.” Dedham originally encom- One of the oldest historical societies in the passed over 200 square miles, stretching from Wellesley and Mendon to the Rhode United States, the Dedham Historical Society Island border. As the population increased, over a dozen new towns were incorporated houses a library, archives, and museum. It and divided from the original settlement by the mid-1700s. also owns one of the foremost collections of Dedham played a role in key moments of U.S. history. In the 1640s, Dedham was the Dedham Pottery. This was the original site first town in the U.S. to establish a free, tax-supported public school, and was the site of Jeremiah Shuttleworth’s home, Dedham’s where a dispute over selection of a minister led to the separation of the Congregation- first Postmaster in the late 1700s. The home Dedham Historical Society alists from the Unitarian church in the early 1800s.
    [Show full text]
  • Con.Gr.Essional· Record-House. August 9
    5368 CON.GR.ESSIONAL· RECORD-HOUSE. AUGUST 9, Congress and the President have continued ever since to unite in act8 ~on, ~d the ~bjection to ~hat date is a hinderance to resumption, and the construe. tion.will be g1ven, and Wl~h some dej!reo of plausibility at ]eagt, that the demo­ to prevent resumptio?· If Congress bas done it, who is responsiblef cratic party want resllDlption earlier than the day fixed. (Applause.) Is the ~enate responsible 1 We sent to the House a bill that would have lowered your rate of interest on the large mass of the public Such was the statement made by General Ewing at the time. Hear debt 1t per cent. per annum. What attention did they pay to itT the answer of Mr. Dorsheimer: None whatever. What bill have they introduced to carry out the Mr. DORSHEDmB. I d? not. propose to speak upon this matter at length. I pro­ recommendation of General Grant or Governor Tilden f Where is the pose J;Iere to make a straight 1ssoe between soft and hard money. · [T'rememlous act introdt;ICed in the J:Iouse of Representatives t? accumulate gold cheenng.) By that we ~t.and or fall. [Cheers.) If yon want soft money gi.V'e your yotes to tl~e resolution offered by the most distingoisheu soft. money ~dvo­ or to provide for fundrng7 None; and now I will tell you why it ca.te m the Uruted St.ates. [Cheers and hisses.) Bot if you want to le:t>e to was not done in the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Independence of the Judicial Branch in the New Republic
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 1998 The Independence of the Judicial Branch in the New Republic Charles G. Geyh Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Emily Field Van Tassel Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Courts Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Geyh, Charles G. and Van Tassel, Emily Field, "The Independence of the Judicial Branch in the New Republic" (1998). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 528. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/528 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IN THE NEW REPUBLIC CHARLES GARDNER GEYH* & EMILY FIELD VAN TASSEL** In monarchical governments, the independence of the judiciary is essential to guard the rights of the subject from the injustice of the crown; but in republics it is equally salutary, in protecting the constitution and laws from the encroachments and the tyranny of faction. Laws, however wholesome or necessary, are frequently the object of temporary aversion, and sometimes popular resistance. It is requisite that the courts of justice should be able, at all times, to present a determined countenance against all licentious acts; and to deal impartially and truly, according to law, between suitors of every description, whether the cause, the question, or the party be popular or unpopular.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    SECOND CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1791, TO MARCH 3, 1793 FIRST SESSION—October 24, 1791, to May 8, 1792 SECOND SESSION—November 5, 1792, to March 2, 1793 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—March 4, 1791, for one day only VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—JOHN ADAMS, of Massachusetts PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—RICHARD HENRY LEE, 1 of Virginia; JOHN LANGDON, 2 of New Hampshire SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—SAMUEL A. OTIS, of Massachusetts DOORKEEPER OF THE SENATE—JAMES MATHERS, of New York SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—JONATHAN TRUMBULL, 3 of Conneticut CLERK OF THE HOUSE—JOHN BECKLEY, 4 of Virginia SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—JOSEPH WHEATON, of Rhode Island DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—GIFFORD DALLEY CONNECTICUT James Gunn William Pinkney 16 17 REPRESENTATIVES John Francis Mercer SENATORS William Vans Murray Oliver Ellsworth Abraham Baldwin Joshua Seney 18 William S. Johnson 5 Francis Willis William Hindman 19 Roger Sherman 6 Anthony Wayne 7 Upton Sheridine John Milledge 8 REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Samuel Sterett James Hillhouse KENTUCKY 9 MASSACHUSETTS Amasa Learned SENATORS Jonathan Sturges SENATORS Jonathan Trumbull John Edwards 10 Caleb Strong George Cabot Jeremiah Wadsworth John Brown 11 REPRESENTATIVES REPRESENTATIVES DELAWARE Fisher Ames Alexander D. Orr 12 Shearjashub Bourne SENATORS Christopher Greenup 13 Elbridge Gerry Richard Bassett Benjamin Goodhue George Read MARYLAND George Leonard REPRESENTATIVE AT LARGE SENATORS Theodore Sedgwick George Thacher John Vining John Henry Artemas Ward Charles Carroll of Carrollton 14 GEORGIA Richard Potts 15 NEW HAMPSHIRE SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES SENATORS William Few Philip Key John Langdon 1 Elected April 18, 1792. 8 Elected to fill vacancy caused by declaring the seat 14 Resigned November 30, 1792.
    [Show full text]