Biological Resources Baseline Report March 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biological Resources Baseline Report March 2019 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District, Nevada Burning Man Event Special Recreation Permit Environmental Impact Statement BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BASELINE REPORT MARCH 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Proposed Special Recreation Permit/Project Information .................................................. 1-1 1.2 Relation to the Draft EIS ............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Wildlife Agencies Consulted ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Internal Scoping and Public Outreach Summary ................................................................... 1-1 CHAPTER 2. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT SUMMARY .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Assessment Areas ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Project Area Description ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.1 General Setting ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.2 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2.3 Soils ................................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Migratory Birds .............................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4 Special Status Species ................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species ..................................................................................... 2-11 2.6 Vegetation (Including Invasive, Nonnative Species) ............................................................ 2-15 2.7 Wetlands and Riparian Areas .................................................................................................. 2-18 2.8 Wildlife .......................................................................................................................................... 2-20 CHAPTER 3. WILDLIFE EFFECTS SYNTHESIS ............................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Lighting ............................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Impacts from Lighting on Avian Species ................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Impacts from Lighting on Mammals ........................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Noise ............................................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 Impacts from Noise on Avian Species ...................................................................... 3-2 3.2.2 Impacts from Noise on Mammals .............................................................................. 3-3 3.3 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.3.1 Impacts from Air Quality on Avian Species ............................................................ 3-4 3.3.2 Impacts from Air Quality on Mammals .................................................................... 3-5 3.3.3 Impacts from Air Quality on Invertebrates ............................................................. 3-5 3.3.4 Impacts from Air Quality on Wildlife Habitat ........................................................ 3-5 3.4 Traffic ............................................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.4.1 Impacts from Traffic on Mammals ............................................................................. 3-6 3.4.2 Impacts from Traffic on Aquatic Invertebrates ...................................................... 3-7 3.4.3 Impacts from Traffic on Avian Species ..................................................................... 3-7 3.4.4 Impacts from Traffic on Aquatic Species.................................................................. 3-8 3.5 Trash and Pollution ...................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.5.1 Impacts from Trash on Avian Species ....................................................................... 3-8 3.5.2 Impacts from Trash on Herpetofauna ...................................................................... 3-9 3.5.3 Impacts from Pollution on Wildlife ........................................................................... 3-9 3.5.4 Impacts from Pollution on Aquatic (Fish) Species ................................................. 3-9 3.6 Human Presence ......................................................................................................................... 3-10 3.6.1 Impacts from Human Presence on Mammals ........................................................ 3-10 3.6.2 Impacts from Human Presence on Avian Species ................................................ 3-10 3.6.3 Impacts from Human Presence on Aquatic Species ............................................ 3-10 CHAPTER 4. EFFECTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 4-1 CHAPTER 5. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 5-1 March 2019 Burning Man Event Special Recreation Permit Draft Environmental Statement i Biological Resources Baseline Report Table of Contents TABLES Page 2-1 Special Status Species Occurring in the Burning Man Assessment Area ........................................ 2-7 2-2 Threatened and Endangered Species with Potential to Occur in the Assessment Area ......... 2-11 2-3 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................................... 2-15 2-4 National Wetlands Inventory Features ................................................................................................ 2-19 2-5 Mule Deer and Pronghorn Antelope Habitat in the Assessment Area ........................................ 2-21 4-1 Effects Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 4-1 FIGURES Page 1 Biological Resources Affected Environment and Effects Assessment Area ................................... 2-3 2 Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat - BLM 2015 Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment ................................................................................................................................................... 2-9 3 Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat - USGS 2016 Habitat modelling for Nevada and Northeastern California ........................................................................................................................... 2-10 DIAGRAM Page 1 Migratory Bird Flyways ............................................................................................................................... 2-5 ATTACHMENT 1 Agency Coordination ii Burning Man Event Special Recreation Permit Draft Environmental Statement March 2019 Biological Resources Baseline Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Full Phrase ACOE US Army Corps of Engineers BLM United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management CFR Code of Federal Regulations EIS environmental impact statement °F degrees Fahrenheit IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation LCT Lahontan cutthroat trout LED light-emitting diode MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act mph miles per hour NCA National Conservation Area NDOW Nevada Department of Wildlife NNHP Nevada Natural Heritage Program NWI United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory OHV off-highway vehicle SRP Special Recreation Permit USC United States Code USFWS United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service March 2019 Burning Man Event Special Recreation Permit Draft Environmental Statement iii Biological Resources Baseline Report Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank. iv Burning Man Event Special Recreation Permit Draft Environmental Statement March 2019 Biological Resources Baseline Report Chapter 1. Introduction This section presents important introductory information and lays out the basis for this wildlife resources effects synthesis. It presents a list of wildlife agencies consulted in preparation of the Burning Man Event Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and summarizes the results of internal and public scoping with respect to wildlife resources issues. 1.1 PROPOSED SPECIAL RECREATION PERMIT/PROJECT INFORMATION The Burning Man event is a combination art festival, social event, and experiment in community living. Burning Man was first held on the Black Rock Desert in 1990 and has continued on an annual basis. The Burning Man organization, Black
Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements
    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE AND REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works Fourth Revision September 15, 2010 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on September 15, 2O1O. ERIC GIBSON Director of Planning and Land Use SNYDER I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the fifteenth day of September, 2010. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources and Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources and Resource Management Plans except any revisions to the Guidelines for Determining Significance presented in Section 4.0 must be approved by the Deputy CAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History of the Cui-Ui, Chasmistes Cujus Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a Review
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 45 Number 4 Article 1 10-31-1985 Life history of the cui-ui, Chasmistes cujus Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a review William F. Sigler W.F. Sigler and Associates Inc., Logan, Utah Steven Vigg University of Nevada, Reno Mimi Bres George Washington University, Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Sigler, William F.; Vigg, Steven; and Bres, Mimi (1985) "Life history of the cui-ui, Chasmistes cujus Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a review," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 45 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol45/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist Published AT Provo, Utah, by Bricham Young University ISSN 0017-3614 Volume 45 31 October 1985 No. 4 LIFE HISTORY OF THE CUI-UI, CHASMISTES CUJUS COPE, IN PYRAMID LAKE, NEVADA: A REVIEW William F". Sigler', Steven Vigg", and Minii Bres' Abstract—The cui-ui, Chasmistcs ciijus Cope, a member of the .sucker family and endemic to Pyramid Lake, Nevada, is listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Cui-ui was once a major source of sustenance for native Americans, who have inhabited the Lahontan region for at least 11,000 years. The Northern Paiutes developed sophisticated fishing technology to harvest this resource.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 State of Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners
    STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS FISHING SEASONS CR 16-02 Amendment #1 The Board of Wildlife Commissioners, under the authority of 501.181 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, does hereby adopt the following regulation for the management of the fisheries resource: FISHING SEASONS MARCH 1, 2016 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2018 LIMITS “Limit” means the maximum number of game fish that may be lawfully taken and reduced to possession by a person in one day. The limit includes fish caught in Nevada which have been processed or preserved and are stored at any location. Fish that are caught and immediately released back to the water alive are not considered to be reduced to possession or part of the limit. A person shall not reduce game fish to possession if he already has the number of that fish in possession which equals or exceeds the limit of the water being fished. General limits are listed by county as all waters, all lakes and reservoirs or all streams and rivers. Exceptions to general limits and special regulations are listed by individual water. 1 CLARK COUNTY All regulations in Clark County are proposed to remain the same with the exception of the following (changes are delineated in boldface type): Lake Mohave Existing Regulation: OPEN WATERS: Lake Mohave Open year around 10 trout, 6 black bass, 25 Any hour of the day or catfish, and 15 crappie. night No limit on striped bass less than 20 inches total length (unlimited possession). The limit on striped bass 20 inches total length or longer is 20 fish.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1 Wildlife Endangered Hand out SC&BI 4.9.20
    Endangered & Imperiled Species Documented in Recent Years at the Ballona Wetlands Ecological Reserve Federal Endangered Species List – [E] = Endangered [T] = Threatened ALL PHOTOS SHOWN IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE TAKEN AT BALLONA WETLANDS ECOLOGICAL RESERVE EXCEPT THE PLOVER NESTING IN THE SAND, TAKEN AT DOCKWEILER STATE BEACH & the Great Blue Heron nest, photo taken at nearby Mariners Village 1. Least Bell’s Vireo Vireo bellii pusillus [E] 2. Coastal California Gnatcatcher Polioptila californica californica [T] (resident songbird) nesting - including (migratory songbird) forages and relies on habitat at BWER; documented singing (courtship) on habitat nesting at nearby Playa del Rey Dunes at LAX on north and south levees of Ballona Creek 3. El Segundo Blue Butterfly 4. California Least Tern Sterna antillarum browni [E] (migratory Euphilotes battoides allyni [E] shorebird – migrates from Guatemala and southern Mexico; nests on reproducing in dunes at Ballona Wetlands ER; nearby Venice Beach in specially fenced preserve; feeds on fish in the also reproducing in nearby PDR Dunes shallow water sloughs and in Ballona Creek; mating documented on salt pannes) 5. Western Snowy Plover Charadrius nivosas nivosas [T] nesting at nearby Dockweiler Beach; sheltering at BWER salt panne 6. Light-footed Ridgway’s Rail (Light-footed Clapper Rail) Rallus longirostris levipes – [E] Female for at least last 2 years at freshwater marsh on edge of BWER (land owned by State Lands Commission) 4.9.20 - photos by Jonathan Coffin, Don Sterba List compiled by: Ballona Wetlands Restoration Committee The Voice for Nature on the Los Angeles Coast PAGE 1 State of California Endangered Species List - [E] = Endangered [T] = Threatened 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Wandering Skipper Survey at the San Elijo Lagoon, Encinitas California
    Wandering Skipper Survey at Famosa Slough, San Diego, California 27 August 2010 Observers: Keith Greer, Betsy Miller, and Kim Roeland Introduction The wandering skipper (Panoquina errans) is a small butterfly of the family Hesperiidae. It is identifiable by its rich dark brown color and cream-colored spots on the dorsal forewing. The wandering skipper is found only along the coast in southern California, Baja California and northwestern mainland Mexico. Populations have been recorded from Huntington Beach, Upper Newport Bay, and Capistrano Beach (Orsak, 1977). In San Diego, the wandering skipper has been documented in the Tijuana Estuary, San Dieguito Lagoon, and Agua Hedionda lagoon (SanGIS, 2010), but it appears that no extensive survey data have been published. The wandering skipper is on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1996) and is under consideration for possible listing on the endangered species list as a threatened species because of the reduction of salt marsh habitat. The larval host plant for this species, salt grass (Distichlis spicata), is found in transitional habitats along the edge of the high marsh. Nectar sources include Heliotropium spp., Haplopappus spp., and Frankenia salina (Orsak 1977). Potential habitat for the wandering skipper was considered to be areas containing the larval host plant in close proximity to nectar plants. Surveys were completed to determine presence of the wandering skipper in potential habitat areas within Famosa Slough, San Diego, California, both north and south of West Point Loma Blvd. Methods The surveys were conducted on August 27, 2010. The first survey, in high marsh habitat south of W.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History and Status of the Endangered Cui-Ui of Pyramid Lake, Nevada
    Fish and Wildlife Research 1 Life History and Status of the Endangered Cui-ui of Pyramid Lake, Nevada By G. Gary Scoppettone Mark Coleman Gary A. Wedemeyer UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington, D.C. • 1986 Contents Page Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 3 Spawning Migration ............................................................................................................ Prespawning Aggregation ............................................................................................. History of Recent Spawning Migrations ............................................................... 6 Upstream Migration ....................................................................................................... Reproduction ......................................................................................................................... 8 Fecundity ............................................................................................................................ 9 Spawning Habitat ............................................................................................................. 9 Emigration of Larvae .......................................................................................................... 10 Timing of
    [Show full text]
  • Newlands Project Frequently Asked Questions
    Newlands Project Frequently Asked Questions http://www.usbr.gov/mp/lbao/ What is the Newlands Project? The Newlands Project in Nevada is one of the first Reclamation projects in the country, with construction beginning in 1903. It covers lands in the counties of Churchill, Lyon, Storey, and Washoe and provides water for about 57,000 acres of irrigated land in the Lahontan Valley near Fallon and bench lands near Fernley. Made up of two divisions, the Truckee Division and the Carson Division, the Project has features in both the Carson and Truckee River basins with the Truckee Canal allowing interbasin diversions from the Truckee River to the Carson River. The major features of the Newlands Project include Lake Tahoe Dam, Derby Diversion Dam, the Truckee Canal, Lahontan Dam, Lahontan Power Plant, Carson River Diversion Dam and canals, laterals, and drains for irrigation of approximately 57,000 acres of farmlands, wetlands and pasture. Water for the Newlands Project comes from the Carson River and supplemental water is diverted from the Truckee River into the Truckee Canal at Derby Dam for conveyance to Lahontan Reservoir for storage. The water stored in Lahontan Reservoir or conveyed by the Truckee Canal is released into the Carson River and diverted into the `V` and `T` Canals at Carson Diversion Dam. The Bureau of Reclamation has a contract with the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District to operate and maintain the Newlands Project on behalf of the Federal government. Who is the Bureau of Reclamation? The Bureau of Reclamation is a federal agency within the Department of the Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Wildlife Notebook
    ARIZONA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ARIZONA WILDLIFE NOTEBOOK GARRY ROGERS Praise for Arizona Wildlife Notebook “Arizona Wildlife Notebook” by Garry Rogers is a comprehensive checklist of wildlife species existing in the State of Arizona. This notebook provides a brief description for each of eleven (11) groups of wildlife, conservation status of all extant species within that group in Arizona, alphabetical listing of species by common name, scientific names, and room for notes. “The Notebook is a statewide checklist, intended for use by wildlife watchers all over the state. As various individuals keep track of their personal observations of wildlife in their specific locality, the result will be a more selective checklist specific to that locale. Such information would be vitally useful to the State Wildlife Conservation Department, as well as to other local agencies and private wildlife watching groups. “This is a very well-documented snapshot of the status of wildlife species – from bugs to bats – in the State of Arizona. Much of it should be relevant to neighboring states, as well, with a bit of fine-tuning to accommodate additions and deletions to the list. “As a retired Wildlife Biologist, I have to say Rogers’ book is perhaps the simplest to understand, yet most comprehensive in terms of factual information, that I have ever had occasion to peruse. This book should become the default checklist for Arizona’s various state, federal and local conservation agencies, and the basis for developing accurate local inventories by private enthusiasts as well as public agencies. "Arizona Wildlife Notebook" provides a superb starting point for neighboring states who may wish to emulate Garry Rogers’ excellent handiwork.
    [Show full text]
  • COE Feasibility Level Fish Bypass Design at Marble Bluff Dam
    Hydraulic Laboratory Report HL-2011-01 COE Feasibility Level Fish Bypass Design at Marble Bluff Dam Subtitle, 16 pt Arial, Bold (optional…consider if title is very long) Optional Auxiliary Text, and/or photograph, or leave blank (13 pt Arial, Bold) Visual Identity program requires photographs to align with a 6-column grid layout which uses 1 inch columns and 0.2 inch gutters. Left edge of photo should be placed on left edge of one of the 6 columns (i.e., at 0, 1.2, 2.4, 3.6, 4.8, 6.0 inches from left margin), and the right edge should be on the right edge of one of the 6 columns (1.0, 2.2, 3.4, 4.6, 5.8, or 7.0 inches from left margin). A transparent template can assist in laying out photos. Margins of this page should be 0.5 inches top and bottom, 0.75 inches left and right. This form has the grid overlay on it. To remove it, use the Format | Background | Printed Watermark command and select No watermark. You will not be able to restore it once it is removed (except by using Undo). U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Hydraulic Investigations and Laboratory Services Group Denver, Colorado April 2011 Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Ts Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports
    DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE & SCIENCE OF NATURE DENVER MUSEUM NUMBER 16, OCTOBER 11, 2019 SCIENCE.DMNS.ORG/MUSEUM-PUBLICATIONS Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports 2001 Colorado Boulevard (Print) ISSN 2374-7730 Denver, CO 80205, U.S.A. Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (Online) ISSN 2374-7749 REPORTS • NUMBER 16 • OCTOBER 11, 2019 • NUMBER 16 OCTOBER Cover photo: Oreas Anglewing (Polygonia oreas nigrozephyrus Scott, 1984), Gregory Canyon, Boulder County, Colorado, USA, 2 October 1973, leg. Michael G. Pogue. Photo: Bob Livingston. The Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (ISSN Frank Krell, PhD, Editor and Production 2374-7730 [print], ISSN 2374-7749 [online]) is an open- access, non peer-reviewed scientifi c journal publishing papers about DMNS research, collections, or other Program and Abstracts Museum related topics, generally authored or co-authored 30th Annual Meeting by Museum staff or associates. Peer review will only be arranged on request of the authors. of the High Country Lepidopterists October 11–12, 2019 The journal is available online at science.dmns.org/ Museum-Publications free of charge. Paper copies Denver Museum of Nature & Science are available for purchase from our print-on-demand publisher Lulu (www.lulu.com). DMNS owns the copyright of the works published in the Reports, which are Frank-Thorsten Krell (Ed.) published under the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial license. For commercial use of published
    [Show full text]
  • View Full Text Article
    Disclaimer Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be obtained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or California/Nevada Operations Manager as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Recovery plan for the Carson wandering skipper (Pseudocopaeodes eunus obscurus). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California. viii + 94 pages. An electronic version of this recovery plan is available at http://www.r1.fws.gov/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html and http://endangered.fws.gov/recovery/index.html. i Acknowledgments This recovery plan was prepared by Marcy Haworth, Fish and Wildlife Biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, with input from species experts and stakeholders. We gratefully acknowledge the commitment and efforts of the following individuals in the recovery of the Carson wandering skipper. Without their assistance and participation during recovery team meetings, this document would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Butterflies and Their Biology to Forward Such for Inclusion in the Larger Study
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(2). 1985. 95-118 NEV ADA BUTTERFLIES: PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION GEORGE T. AUSTIN Nevada State Museum and Historical Society, 700 Twin Lakes Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 ABSTRACT. The distribution by county of the 189 species (over 300 taxa) of but­ terflies occurring in Nevada is presented along with a list of species incorrectly recorded for the state. There are still large areas which are poorly or not collected. Nevada continues as one of the remaining unknown areas in our knowledge of butterfly distribution in North America. Although a com­ prehensive work on the state's butterflies is in preparation, there is sufficient demand for a preliminary checklist to justify the following. It is hoped this will stimulate those who have any data on Nevada butterflies and their biology to forward such for inclusion in the larger study. Studies of Nevada butterflies are hampered by a paucity of resident collectors, a large number of mountain and valley systems and vast areas with little or no access. Non-resident collectors usually funnel into known and well worked areas, and, although their data are valu­ able, large areas of the state remain uncollected. Intensive collecting, with emphasis on poorly known areas, over the past seven years by Nevada State Museum personnel and associates has gone far to clarify butterfly distribution within the state. The gaps in knowledge are now more narrowly identifiable and will be filled during the next few sea­ sons. There is no all encompassing treatment of Nevada's butterfly fauna. The only state list is an informal recent checklist of species (Harjes, 1980).
    [Show full text]