Europe: Prehistoric Rock Art E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Europe: Prehistoric Rock Art E Europe: Prehistoric Rock Art 2599 E thought to follow its own story imprinted in plas- tic arts, images, and rock combined. The Europe: Prehistoric Rock Art sequence of chambers, their distance from day- light, total obscurity, oppressive dampness, and Georges Sauvet1, Cesar Gonza´lez Sainz2, low temperature condition are the soul for the Jose´ Luis Sanchidria´n3 and Valentı´n Villaverde4 reception of founding myths as to the justification 1Centre de Recherche et d’Etude de l’Art of the group and the mysteries with which all Pre´historique, Universite´ de Toulouse-II, conscious existence is confronted. The solutions Toulouse, France were there, revealed as soothing, real with respect 2Instituto Internacional de Investigaciones to the dangers of the path taken into the cave, and Prehisto´ricas de Cantabria (IIIPC), Universidad E unreal with respect to the secrets of life, all com- de Cantabria, Santander, Spain bined in a dazzling of physical and spiritual 3Area de Prehistoria, Departamento de Geografı´a senses. Gothic windows do nothing other than y Ciencias del Territorio, Facultad de Filosofı´a seduce in order to convince. And the temples of y Letras, Universidad de Co´rdoba, Co´rdoba, Science are even more suspect of soliciting, with Spain their columns, tympanums, porticos and statues 4Departamento de Prehistoria y Arqueologı´a, from Antiquity. Universitat de Vale`ncia, Valencia, Spain The revelations contained in the depths of damp dark caves harnessed the suspended conscience, by adolescence as much as by the Introduction dangers overcome. But the solutions were there, in the trembling illumination on the damp walls In its broadest sense, the term prehistoric rock with bright vivid colors. Their harmony, linked art covers the whole of graphic manifestations to the scale of forms, gigantic and dancing fig- affixed by prehistoric humans on rock surfaces ures, came literally out of the darkness and of all kinds. The surfaces can be rocks out in anguish. The revelation of the mysteries of exis- the open air, walls protected by shallow tence was accorded by the seduction stimulated rockshelters, or deep cave walls in total dark- by the rhythms, color, and strangeness. Paleo- ness. For deep cave situations, the term “parietal lithic art, like man who overcame the challenges art” is often used, but these two terms cover the of earthly life, also contributes one of the culmi- same reality. The phenomenon is widespread nating points in the spiritual adventure of throughout the world, as it meets the basic civilization. needs of preliterate human societies. In Europe, prehistoric rock art extends from northern Nor- way to Andalusia and covers more than 30,000 Cross-References years, from the Upper Paleolithic to the Roman conquest. As a result, it responds to an infinite ▶ European Upper Paleolithic Rock Art: number of motivations depending on beliefs, Sacredness, Sanctity, and Symbolism systems of social organization, and types of sub- sistence economies. In formal terms, it uses a wide range of techniques (engraving, sculp- Further Reading ture, finger strokes in clay, line drawings, mono- chrome or polychrome painting) and a wide CLOTTES, J. 2008. L’art des cavernes pre´historiques. Paris: range of styles (from figurative naturalist art to Phaidon. schematic and to geometric abstraction). LEROI-GOURHAN, A. 1965. Pre´histoire de l’art occidental. Although the word art is sometimes criticized Paris: Mazenod. LORBLANCHET, M. 1995. Les grottes orne´es de la because of its contemporary connotation, it is pre´histoire. Nouveaux regards. Paris: Errance. difficult to escape the idea that the human groups E 2600 Europe: Prehistoric Rock Art who made rock art were pursuing, in addition to Key Issues the basic motivations that animated them, an undeniable aesthetic quest, even if it sometimes Paleolithic Rock Art diverges from our own criteria. General Points Paleolithic rock art occurs throughout the Upper Paleolithic, beginning c. 35,000 BP (or earlier) Historical Background (with the arrival of Homo sapiens sapiens in Europe) and ending around 12,000 BP, shortly In the nineteenth century, there was little before the end of the glacial period. The oldest acceptance of the aptitude of prehistoric people figurative works, attributed to the “Aurignacian” to paint and engrave images onto rock. The idea culture, are the statuettes of Swabian Jura of the “primitive savage” perpetuated for a long (Germany) and the parietal paintings and engrav- time and prevented the acceptance of the full ings on the caves of Fumane (Italy), dated intellectual capacities of societies before his- between 32,000 and 36,500 14C BP, and of tory. The remarkable bison paintings on the ceil- Chauvet (France), between 30,000 and 32,000 ingofAltamira,discoveredin1879,werenot 14C BP (radiocarbon dating strongly underesti- officially recognized as a prehistoric work until mates calendar ages). 1902. There is no doubt that the aesthetic, natu- Paleolithic art is fundamentally an art of ani- ralism, and polychrome character of these fig- mals: human representations are rare and are ures impeded this recognition. It was not until most often caricature-like, in contrast to animals the second half of the twentieth century that which achieve a sometimes striking realism. paleoanthropological approaches to rock art Numerous nonfigurative drawings or “signs” meant that rock art study could acquire the status complete the iconography. Deep caves, invested of a scientific discipline within prehistoric since the beginning of the period, remained the archaeology. Today, rock art is considered most popular places until the end, to the extent a precious tool with which to address the cultures that we sometimes speak of “cave art,” even and the ideological and symbolic universe of though engravings and sculptures also decorated hunter-gatherer, then herders and farmers occupied rockshelters, and that rocks exposed to societies who succeeded on the European the open air have also recently been discovered in territory. The need to leave a lasting mark of Spain and Portugal. one’s culture on monumental mediums is An in-depth examination reveals deep regional universal. Only the forms and locations that thematic and stylistic differences and significant were selected to practice this exercise change changes over time across Europe. Several models with the subsistence economy and the prevailing of relative chronology, based on archaeological systems of thought. data, superpositions, and stylistic sequences, have In a report presented to UNESCO in 1984, the been proposed. Those of Henri Breuil (1952) and number of individual rock art graphics in Europe Andre´ Leroi-Gourhan (1965) are the better well was estimated at four million (Anati 2003). This known, but new methods for direct dating by number has easily been surpassed today. accelerator mass spectrometry and also recent Paleolithic art alone counts for more than 360 discoveries like the Chauvet Cave have forced sites, with recent discoveries of major scientific a reconsideration of the chronostylistic models interest in France (Chauvet in 1994), Portugal based on the assumption of a linear evolution (Foz Coˆa in 1994), and Spain (La Garma in leading from an original schematic form toward 1995). The debate is no longer about the better controlled realism. Some advances and set- authenticity but rather about the chronocultural backs, phases of invention, and regression have attribution of these works, given the difficulty of crisscrossed over these 20,000 years and provided absolute dating. a more complex schema. Europe: Prehistoric Rock Art 2601 E Iberian Peninsula phenomenon began with the Aurignacian In the extreme southwest of Europe, the Iberian (at least in the north: La Vin˜a rockshelter, early Peninsula retains evidence of intense graphic phases of Castillo) and is present at the southern activity during the Upper Paleolithic, with more end (Tarifa group) from the Gravettian (Fig. 1). than 200 parietal assemblages distributed in all Paleolithic art from the Iberian Peninsula is fully regions, not including the many portable art integrated with that of Western Europe and objects (Bicho et al. 2007). The most important presents the same two formal conceptions of the concentration is that in the Cantabrian region, animal figure, a conceptual naturalism, minimal- a narrow strait between sea and mountain, open ist, in the early phases (figures reduced to at its eastern point toward the southwest French a contour with very few details and internal E region, which contains around 120 decorated elements) and, from 17,000 BP, a more visual caves covering all the periods of the Upper naturalism, attentive to anatomical details, with Paleolithic (Collective 2002; Gonza´lez Sainz a more successful treatment of volume (infills and et al. 2003;Rı´os Gonza´lez et al. 2007). Centers, internal details, correct perspectives of limbs and such as Pen˜a Candamo, Altamira, El Castillo, and horns). However, art from the Iberian Peninsula La Pasiega, have played an important role in the shows notable singularities such as engraved history of research on Paleolithic rock art. Other rocks in open air in the valleys of Atlantic rivers regions on the peninsula, which had practically with large-size figures produced by pecking no parietal evidence around thirty years ago, (Fig. 2). With few exceptions, paintings are only today present important concentrations. We can preserved in deep caves. Additionally, more tem- cite among others the spectacular rock outcrops perate climatic conditions than in the northern in open air in the Duero valleys (Domingo regions of Europe brought about a distribution Garcia, Siega Verde, Mazouco, and specially of rich fauna including horses, aurochs, stags, the 27 sites along the Coˆa River), Tagus (Ocreza), does, and ibex with a gradient from north to and Guadiana (Molino Manza´nez) (Baptista south: in the Cantabrian region, in addition to 2009). To these open-air sites, several caves this fauna, bison and reindeer (mostly during the need to be added: Escoural in Portugal, Magdalenian) and some very rare mammoths and Maltravieso in Extremadura, and in the interior megaloceros can be found.
Recommended publications
  • The Janus-Faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage
    The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon To cite this version: Mélanie Duval, Christophe Gauchon. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, Taylor & Francis, In press, 10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329. hal-03078965 HAL Id: hal-03078965 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03078965 Submitted on 21 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Duval Mélanie, Gauchon Christophe, 2021. The Janus-faced dilemma of rock art heritage management in Europe: a double dialectic process between conservation and public outreach, transmission and exclusion, Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2020.1860329 Authors: Mélanie Duval and Christophe Gauchon Mélanie Duval: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France; * Rock Art Research Institute GAES, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Christophe Gauchon: *Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB), CNRS, Environnements, Dynamics and Territories of Mountains (EDYTEM), Chambéry, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating Aurignacian Rock Art in Altxerri B Cave (Northern Spain)
    Journal of Human Evolution 65 (2013) 457e464 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol Not only Chauvet: Dating Aurignacian rock art in Altxerri B Cave (northern Spain) C. González-Sainz a, A. Ruiz-Redondo a,*, D. Garate-Maidagan b, E. Iriarte-Avilés c a Instituto Internacional de Investigaciones Prehistóricas de Cantabria (IIIPC), Avenida de los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain b CREAP Cartailhac-TRACES-UMR 5608, University de Toulouse-Le Mirail, 5 allées Antonio Machado, 31058 Toulouse Cedex 9, France c Laboratorio de Evolución Humana, Dpto. CC. Históricas y Geografía, University de Burgos, Plaza de Misael Bañuelos s/n, Edificio IþDþi, 09001 Burgos, Spain article info abstract Article history: The discovery and first dates of the paintings in Grotte Chauvet provoked a new debate on the origin and Received 29 May 2013 characteristics of the first figurative Palaeolithic art. Since then, other art ensembles in France and Italy Accepted 2 August 2013 (Aldène, Fumane, Arcy-sur-Cure and Castanet) have enlarged our knowledge of graphic activity in the early Available online 3 September 2013 Upper Palaeolithic. This paper presents a chronological assessment of the Palaeolithic parietal ensemble in Altxerri B (northern Spain). When the study began in 2011, one of our main objectives was to determine the Keywords: age of this pictorial phase in the cave. Archaeological, geological and stylistic evidence, together with Upper Palaeolithic radiometric dates, suggest an Aurignacian chronology for this art. The ensemble in Altxerri B can therefore Radiocarbon dating Cantabrian region be added to the small but growing number of sites dated in this period, corroborating the hypothesis of fi Cave painting more complex and varied gurative art than had been supposed in the early Upper Palaeolithic.
    [Show full text]
  • Lascaux Cave, France  Complex Hunter Gatherers at the End of the Paleolithic  Dates: 47/45,000 – 20/18,000 B.P
    Lascaux Cave, France Complex Hunter Gatherers at the End of the Paleolithic Dates: 47/45,000 – 20/18,000 b.p. (Epipaleolithic=20/18,000-10,000 bp) Industries include microliths and bone tools—not found in previous periods Raw materials were exchanged over long distances in this period Wide range of materials, other than flint, come into use: bone tools, stone vessels, ochre, shells Some probably for ritual purposes In contrast to early modern humans (and Neanderthals): Size of teeth reduced Size of jaw reduced Muscularity diminishes Less skeletal trauma Increased longevity Cro-Magnon cranium Upper Paleolithic Artwork Cave Art Includes spectacular images of animals and abstract forms and, rarely, humans Mobiliary Art These portable art objects include Venus figurines Body Ornamentation: Pierced shells, pierced animal teeth, and bone beads were most likely work as necklaces or attached to clothing Horse, Cosquer Cave, France Penquin or Auk, Cosquer Cave, France Bear Bison ‘Venus’ figurines Dolni Vestonice Lespugue Willendorf . Appear around 25,000 bp, Europe . Carved in ivory, wood, stone, modeled in clay . Breasts, hips, buttocks, thighs, usually large . Head, arms, hands, legs & feet are only schematic . Some are pregnant, others are not 4.48.jpg Dwellings Huts with bone frameworks Floors with inlaid stone Stone-lined pits for hearths Tailored clothing Long-distance trade Blade technique Long, parallel-sided flakes are struck off the edges of a specially prepared core Blades: long flake, twice as punch long as wide • Sharp parallel edges • Removed from core like peeling carrot (sort of) • Blades provide “blank” or form, which may then be shaped into different tools: .
    [Show full text]
  • KMBT C554e-20150630165533
    Recent Research on Paleolithic Arts in Europe and the Multimedia Database Cesar Gonzalez Sai 民 Roberto Cacho Toca Department Department of Historical Sciences. University of Cantabria. Avda. Los Castros s/n. 39005. SANTANDER (Spain) e-mail: e-mail: [email protected] I [email protected] Summary. In In this article the authors present the Multimedia Photo YR Database, made by Texnai, Inc. (Tokyo) and the the Department of Historical Sciences of the University of Cantabria (Spain) about the paleolithic art in northern northern Spain. For this purpose, it ’s made a short introduction to the modem knowledge about the European European paleolithic art (35000 ・1 1500 BP), giving special attention to the last research trends and, in which way, the new techniques (computers, digital imaging, database, physics ... ) are now improving the knowledge about this artistic works. Finally, is made a short explanation about the Multimedia Photo YR Database Database and in which way, these databases can improve, not only research and teaching, but also it can promote in the authorities and people the convenience of an adequate conservation and research of these artistic artistic works. Key Words: Multimedia Database, Paleolithic Art, Europe, North Spain, Research. 1. 1. Introduction. The paleolithic European art. Between approximately 35000 and 11500 years BP, during the last glacial phases, the European continent continent saw to be born a first artistic cycle of surprising surprising aesthetic achievements. The expressive force force reached in the representation of a great variety of of wild animals, with some very simple techniques, techniques, has been rarely reached in the history of the the western a此 We find this figurative art in caves, caves, rock-shelters and sites in the open air, and at the the same time, on very di 仔erent objects of the daily li た (pendants, spatulas, points ofjavelin, harpoons, perforated perforated baton, estatues or simple stone plates).
    [Show full text]
  • Are Hand Stencils in European Cave Art Older Than We Think? an Evaluation of the Existing Data and Their Potential Implications
    Are hand stencils in European cave art older than we think? An evaluation of the existing data and their potential implications. P. Pettitt1, P. Arias2, M. García-Diez3, D. Hoffmann4, A. Maximiano Castillejo5, R. Ontañon-Peredo6, A. Pike7 and J. Zilhão8. 1Department of Archaeology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom. 2The Cantabria Institute for Prehistoric Research, University of Cantabria, Edificio Interfacultativo, Avda. Los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain. 3Departamento de Geografía, Prehistoria y Arquelogía, Facultad de Letras, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, c/ Tomás y Valiente s/n, 01006 Vitoria-Gazteiz, Álava, Spain. 4Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Department of Human Evolution, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. 5Facultad de Filosofía y Letras UNAM, Circuito Interior. Ciudad Universitaria, s/n. C.P. 04510. México, DF. México. 6The Cantabria Institute for Prehistoric Research - Cuevas Prehistóricas de Cantabria, Carretera de las Cuevas s/n, 39670 Puente Viesgo, Spain. 7Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Avenue Campus, Highfield Road, Southampton, SO17 1BF, UK. 8University of Barcelona/ICREA, Departament de Prehistòria, Història Antiga i Arqueologia, “Grup de Recerca” SERP SGR2014-00108, c/ Montalegre 6, 08001 Barcelona, Spain. Introduction Among his many meticulous publications on Spanish Upper Palaeolithic art, Rodrigo de Balbín Behrmann has documented many examples of the application of red pigments to cave walls directly by the fingers or hand, such as washes of red, paired or multiple lines, and finger dots (e.g. in La Lloseta [Balbín et al. 2005] and in Tito Bustillo [Balbín 1989; Balbín et al. 2002]). Perhaps the most iconic form of such interactions between the hand, pigments and cave walls are hand stencils, which are perhaps best contextualised as the most obvious extreme on a continuum of hand markings on walls.
    [Show full text]
  • SIG08 Davidson
    CLOTTES J. (dir.) 2012. — L’art pléistocène dans le monde / Pleistocene art of the world / Arte pleistoceno en el mundo Actes du Congrès IFRAO, Tarascon-sur-Ariège, septembre 2010 – Symposium « Signes, symboles, mythes et idéologie… » Symbolism and becoming a hunter-gatherer Iain DAVIDSON* I dedicate this paper to the memory of Andrée Rosenfeld. From the time when, as an undergraduate, I read her book with Peter Ucko (Ucko & Rosenfeld 1967) that corrected the excesses of the structuralist approach to French cave “art” to the occasion of a visit to her home only months before she passed away, I found Andrée a model of good sense about all matters to do with all forms of rock “art”. She gave me and many others nothing but sound advice and managed to navigate between theory and data with more clear sight of her destination than most others. And she was, simply, one of the nicest people who ever became an archaeologist. She will be sorely missed. Pleistocene paintings and engravings are not art From time to time, we all worry about the use of the word “art” in connection with what we study (see review in Bradley 2009, Ch. 1). The images on rock and other surfaces that concern us here have some visual similarity with some of what is called art in other contexts, particularly when they are of great beauty (e.g. Chauvet et al. 1995; Clottes 2001). Yet the associations of art –paintings, sculptures and other works– over the last six hundred years (see e.g. Gombrich 1995) (or perhaps only three hundred according to Shiner 2001), mean that it is highly unlikely that any paintings or engraved images on rocks or in caves relate to social, economic, and cultural circumstances similar in any way to those of art in the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Sorting the Ibex from the Goats in Portugal Robert G
    Sorting the ibex from the goats in Portugal Robert G. Bednarik An article by António Martinho Baptista (2000) in the light-weight rock art magazine Adoranten1 raises a number of fascinating issues about taxonomy. The archaeological explanations so far offered for a series of rock art sites in the Douro basin of northern Portugal and adjacent parts of Spain contrast with the scientific evidence secured to date from these sites. This includes especially archaeozoological, geomorphological, sedimentary, palaeontological, dating and especially analytical data from the art itself. For instance one of the key arguments in favour of a Pleistocene age of fauna depicted along the Côa is the claim that ibex became extinct in the region with the end of the Pleistocene. This is obviously false. Not only do ibex still occur in the mountains of the Douro basin—even if their numbers have been decimated—they existed there throughout the Holocene. More relevantly, the German achaeozoologist T. W. Wyrwoll (2000) has pointed out that all the ibex-like figures in the Côa valley resemble Capra ibex lusitanica or victoriae. The Portuguese ibex, C. i. lusitanica, became extinct only in 1892, and not as Zilhão (1995) implies at the end of the Pleistocene. The Gredos ibex (C. i. victoriae) still survives in the region. The body markings depicted on one of the Côa zoomorphs, a figure from Rego da Vide, resemble those found on C. i. victoriae so closely that this typical Holocene sub-species rather than a Pleistocene sub-species (notably Capra ibex pyrenaica) is almost certainly depicted (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeoart of the Ice Age
    Palaeoart of the Ice Age Palaeoart of the Ice Age By Robert G. Bednarik Palaeoart of the Ice Age By Robert G. Bednarik This book first published 2017 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2017 by Robert G. Bednarik All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-9517-2 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-9517-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 Outlining the Issues Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 The nature of palaeoart .......................................................................... 3 About this book ...................................................................................... 6 About Eve .............................................................................................. 9 Summing up ......................................................................................... 21 Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 37 Africa Earlier Stone Age (ESA) and Lower Palaeolithic ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopic Evidence for Dietary Ecology of Cave Lion (Panthera Spelaea
    Isotopic evidence for dietary ecology of cave lion (Panthera spelaea) in North-Western Europe: Prey choice, competition and implications for extinction Hervé Bocherens, Dorothée G. Drucker, Dominique Bonjean, Anne Bridault, Nicolas Conard, Christophe Cupillard, Mietje Germonpré, Markus Höneisen, Suzanne Münzel, Hannes Napierala, et al. To cite this version: Hervé Bocherens, Dorothée G. Drucker, Dominique Bonjean, Anne Bridault, Nicolas Conard, et al.. Isotopic evidence for dietary ecology of cave lion (Panthera spelaea) in North-Western Europe: Prey choice, competition and implications for extinction. Quaternary International, Elsevier, 2011, 245 (2), pp.249-261. 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.02.023. hal-01673488 HAL Id: hal-01673488 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01673488 Submitted on 28 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Isotopic evidence for dietary ecology of cave lion (Panthera spelaea) in North-Western Europe: Prey choice, competition and implications for extinction Hervé Bocherens a,*, Dorothée G. Drucker a,b, Dominique
    [Show full text]
  • Turismo En Las Cuevas: El Patrimonio Rupestre En Cantabria, España Cave Tourism
    Gran Tour: Revista de Investigaciones Turísticas nº 16 Julio-Diciembre de 2017 p.78-94 ISSN: 2172-8690 Escuela Universitaria de Turismo, Universidad de Murcia TURISMO EN LAS CUEVAS: EL PATRIMONIO RUPESTRE EN CANTABRIA, ESPAÑA CAVE TOURISM: ROCK ART HERITAGE IN CANTABRIA, SPAIN FRANCESC FUSTÉ-FORNÉ1 Facultad de Turismo, Universitat de Girona RESUMEN Desde el descubrimiento de las primeras cavidades, la relación entre arqueología y turismo en estos espacios ha evolucionado teniendo en cuenta varios aspectos de forma simultánea, entre los cuales la conservación y el desarrollo sostenible del entorno han sido primordiales. A la vez, la activación turística de estos espacios es un eje estratégico para el desarrollo rural. Este artículo analiza la importancia del turismo en cuevas en Cantabria, que aglutina la mayor densidad de cuevas de arte rupestre del mundo. Para visitantes y turistas, este tipo de turismo tiene un atractivo tanto cultural como natural. Palabras clave: arte rupestre, cuevas, espacios naturales, España, turismo arqueológico, turismo rural. ABSTRACT From the discovery of a cave, the relationship between archaeology and tourism primarily considers issues such as conservation and sustainable development. Also, tourism activity later performs as strategic driver for rural development. This paper analyses the role of cave tourism in Cantabria, which agglutinates the world’s major density of caves. To visitors and tourists, motivations for cave tourism come from both cultural and natural factors. Key words: rock art, caves, natural areas, Spain, archaeological tourism, rural tourism. Fecha de Recepción 3 de noviembre 2017. Fecha de Aceptación 22 de diciembre 2017 1 Facultad de Turismo, Universitat de Girona.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Descriptions Tourism (514.08
    COURSE DESCRIPTIONS Bachelor’s Degree in Tourism 1st year 6750 PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS PART I: INTRODUCTION TO THE ECONOMY Lesson 1: Fundamentals of the economy. 1.1. Concept y method in economics. 1.2. Scarcity and need to choose: the frontier of production possibilities. 1.3. Resource assignation in a market economy system. 1.4. Efficiency, market failure and the State. PART II: MICROECONOMY Lesson 2: Demand, offer, and price. 2.1. Demand. 2.2. Offer. 2.3. Market balance. 2.4. Applications of demand and offer analysis. Lesson 3: Elasticity and its applications. 3.1. Demand elasticity. 3.2. The elasticity of offer. 3.3. Applications of elasticity in demand and offer. Lesson 4: The firm: production and costs. 4.1. Basic concepts. 4.2. The productive activity of the firm. 4.3. Production costs. Lesson 5: Perfect competition. 5.1. Characteristics of competitive models. 5.2. Short-term competitive equilibrium. Lesson 6: Non-competitive markets. 6.1. The monopoly. 1 6.2. Monopolistic competition. 6.3. The oligopoly. PART III. MACROECONOMY Lesson 7. NATIONAL ACCOUNTING AND BASIC MACRO-ECONOMIC PROBLEMS. 7.1. The objectives of the macroeconomy. 7.2. Gross National Product (GNP). Estimation methods. 7.3. Nominal GDP and economic growth rate. 7.4. Balance of Payments and exchange rates. Lesson 8. THE ASSETS MARKET AND FISCAL POLICY. 8.1. The components of aggregate demand. 8.2. The Keynesian model of income determination. 8.3. Tax policy. Lesson 9. THE MONEY MARKETS AND MONETARY POLICY. 9.1. Concept and functions of money. 9.2. Demand for money and monetary offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Painting
    Cave Painting Cave paintings from Lascaux caves (Montignac, Dordogne, France) Some of the earliest examples of art include cave paintings found all over the world. Going as far back in time as tens of thousands of years, the paintings often show animals and humans in connection with the natural environment. These images give us a glimpse of the mind of the maker, communicating natural and possibly spiritual messages through symbolic drawings. Making art is a very human cultural experience, and our expression of art has been a constant practice right from the start. Neolithic cave paintings found in Tassil-n-Ajjer (Plateau of the Chasms) region of the Sahara Be inspired by cave paintings and make your own cave art! See below for examples of cave art from the Maxwell Museum Ancestors exhibit and click here for a video tutorial for making your own cave painting. Cave painting reproductions, Maxwell Museum – Salon Noir, Niaux, France Draw your own forms or use these traditional forms for inspiration. Resources: Cave painting online exhibit – Google Arts and Culture https://artsandculture.google.com/project/chauvet-cave Cave painting lesson plan from the National Endowment for the Humanities https://edsitement.neh.gov/lesson-plans/cave-art-discovering-prehistoric-humans-through-pictures UNESCO page on cave art around the world https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/?search=cave+art&order=country Lascaux guided tour – French Ministry of Culture https://archeologie.culture.fr/lascaux/fr#/en/00.xml/index.html Cave Art 101 – National Geographic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjejoT1gFOc Lascaux Cave Paintings – Project #113 – United Art and Education https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1HC3UeBAng Lessons on Lascaux – Dick Blick https://www.dickblick.com/lesson-plans/lessons-on-lascaux/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0yH0Ia3NDE Lulu inspired by cave art .
    [Show full text]