Marywood University EXECUTIVE SEARCH PROFILE SENIOR DIRECTOR of ADMISSIONS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marywood University EXECUTIVE SEARCH PROFILE SENIOR DIRECTOR of ADMISSIONS Marywood University EXECUTIVE SEARCH PROFILE SENIOR DIRECTOR OF ADMISSIONS 1 Awesomw College | The Opportunity Marywood University, a private, coeducational, Catholic, liberal arts institution of approximately 3,000 students located in Scranton, Pennsylvania, seeks an experienced, dynamic, and talented Senior Director of Admissions. Reporting to the Vice President for Enrollment Services and Student Success, the Senior Director will lead recruitment efforts to enroll academically capable and diverse undergraduate, graduate, international, intensive English, and pre-collegiate program students in the University. 2 Marywood University | Senior Director of Admissions The University Located on 115 scenic acres, Marywood University blends Outstanding freshman to sophomore retention figures and six- outstanding academic, residential, athletic, and recreational year graduation rates place the University well ahead of many of facilities within a safe, residential neighborhood. The University its direct competitors. Twenty-two athletic teams compete at offers 60 Bachelors degrees, 36 Masters degrees, and two the NCAA Division III level; Marywood University is a member doctoral degree programs. Eighty-seven percent of faculty of the Atlantic East Conference, Landmark Conference (M/W has earned their terminal degree, and a low 12:1 student to Swimming & Diving and Women’s Golf only) and the Eastern faculty ratio ensures easy access to those top scholars. The College Athletic Conference. Scranton/Wilkes Barre metropolitan area, the fourth largest in Pennsylvania, offers a low cost of living, excellent schools, Marywood’s legacy has been about embracing and promoting easy access to multiple outdoor recreational opportunities, values of social justice and aiding the greater community. In professional baseball and ice hockey, and close proximity to recent years, Marywood faculty, staff, alumni, and students have major east coast cities. donated over 200,000 hours of service to the greater Scranton area. 3 Marywood University | Senior Director of Admissions Mission Marywood University, sponsored by the Congregation of the Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, roots itself in the Catholic intellectual tradition, the principle of justice, and the belief that education empowers people. The University integrates an enduring liberal arts tradition and professional disciplines to create a comprehensive learning experience. Our undergraduate and graduate programs promote academic excellence, advance innovative scholarship and foster leadership in service to others. Within a welcoming and supportive community, Marywood challenges individuals of all backgrounds to achieve their full potential and make choices based on spiritual and ethical values. Marywood University prepares students to seek sustainable solutions for the common good and educates global citizens to live responsibly in an interdependent world. 4 Marywood University | Senior Director of Admissions Core Values Catholic Identity The pursuit of truth, goodness, beauty, justice, and the common good within the context of the Catholic faith tradition and in dialogue and service with persons of diverse faiths and worldviews. Respect Honoring the uniqueness and dignity of each human person; demonstrating ethical and just interactions; and caring for the earth and all creation through a commitment to sustainability. Empowerment Access to education that enables all to achieve their full potential to live as conscientious citizens in a pluralistic society. Service A commitment to promoting social responsibility which fosters community engagement to meet real needs. Excellence Manifesting Marywood University’s pursuit of the highest level of achievement in support of “Sanctitas, Scientia, Sanitas.” 5 Marywood University | Senior Director of Admissions Position Responsibilities The Senior Director of Admissions will lead the recruitment team in pursuing targeted enrollments to reach University financial, academic, and mission objectives. To achieve enrollment goals, he or she will carefully select, train, motivate, empower, and lead staff and direct the development and implementation of policies and procedures to optimize staffing for the efficient processing, review and evaluation of students for admission. 6 Marywood University | Senior Director of Admissions Challenges & Opportunities The Senior Director of Admissions will develop and maintain providing input and direction regarding printed and electronic effective relationships with internal stakeholders (faculty, deans, materials. administrators, current students, athletics, alumni relations, and staff) to educate and inform regarding admission trends, The Senior Director will routinely analyze data to strategies, and tactics. Employing an analytical mindset to shape enrollment directions and make appropriate effectively use data the Senior Director will provide regular adjustments, regularly reassessing the effectiveness of reports, data analyses, and evaluation to the Vice President recruitment activities. He or she will reach out to external for Enrollment Services and Student Success; collaborate stakeholders including, but not limited to, parents, students, with campus partners to promote a culture of enrollment guidance officials, college placement officers, independent management; evaluate and research enrollment trends to counselors, and admission-specific professional associations. shape strategic directions, regularly reassess the effectiveness of recruitment activities, and make appropriate adjustments to In addition, the Senior Director will lead committees in order lead an effort that is proactive, strategic, and responsive to the to propel the priorities of University Admissions and changing needs of the student market. It is critical to maintain facilitate long range planning using research and applied awareness of current demographic, legal and ethical issues theory to analyze the marketplace. S/he also serves on affecting admission policies and programs in higher education. additional university committees in an advisory capacity. The Senior Director will facilitate long range planning using research and applied theory to analyze the marketplace. He or she will lead the development of, and execute initiatives as outlined in the Strategic Enrollment Plan with University constituents; work with the Associate Director for Communications, and other colleagues, to implement the communication strategies for University Admissions, including 7 Marywood University | Senior Director of Admissions Qualifications Opportunities& Skills – Seven to ten years of progressive experience in admissions/ – Success in utilizing alumni in student recruitment and enrollment management enrollment yield activities – Success in developing and executing strategies and tactics – Possess an excellent understanding of current admissions to increase enrollment in a variety of markets at both the best practices in all functional areas undergraduate and graduate level. This would include primary feeders, secondary and tertiary territories, under – Ability to mine and apply data to operational and strategic served populations, and international markets priorities. – Ability to develop and maintain key professional relationships – Possess excellent supervisory, problem-solving, listening, including international organizations focused on student and leadership skills recruitment, enrollment consultants, marketing firms, and – Ability to organize and prioritize workload for self and staff technology partners – Ability to organize and complete multiple tasks – Ability to understand and articulate technological innovations (including CRM), and to apply that knowledge and skill to – Thorough understanding of federal and state laws, and support admissions processes and communications university policies, governing admissions and recruitment – Demonstrated experience with financial aid leveraging tools – Demonstrated ability to create and monitor operating and forecast and predictive modeling (including net tuition budgets; maximize the effectiveness of available resources revenue models) – Promote and support open dialogue and transparency in all – Success in building and refining prospect pools that align aspects of the work with institutional priorities and goals – Demonstrated ability to maintain and enhance a strong – A high degree of involvement with admissions/enrollment working relationship between enrollment management and management professional associations to increase the intercollegiate athletics department institutional visibility and improve staff/personal professional development – Approachable; accountable; a person of integrity and high moral character; possesses a sense of humor – Ability to be articulate, persuasive and precise in oral and written communications with internal and external audiences, – Experience with developing and maintaining a culture of including the President, Cabinet, Board of Trustees, faculty, hospitality and customer-first in dealing with students and staff, alumni (internal) and students, parents, school their families counselors, vendors (external); – Bachelor’s degree required; Masters degree preferred – Experience with international student recruitment including international travel, student visas, and identifying appropriate international markets 8 Marywood University | Senior Director of Admissions APPLICATION PROCESS RH Perry & Associates is assisting Marywood University with the search for the Senior
Recommended publications
  • NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program
    REPORT OF THE NCAA DIVISION III CHAMPIONSHIPS COMMITTEE JUNE 22, 2021, VIDEOCONFERENCE ACTION ITEMS. 1. Legislative items. • None. 2. Nonlegislative items. • None. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS. 1. Opening remarks and review of schedule and agenda. Division III Championships Committee Chair Kiki Jacobs welcomed committee members and reviewed the meeting schedule and key discussion items. 2. Recent committee reports. The committee reviewed and approved a combined report from its May 5, 7 and 12 electronic votes as presented. 3. Governance update. NCAA staff reviewed the following key items with the committee: (1) next steps following the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Alston case; (2) update on student- athlete name, image and likeness concepts being considered by various groups within the NCAA membership; (3) national office staff support and NCAA website reorganization; (4) Division III budget update; (5) COVID-19 resources and resocialization guidelines; (6) Division III strategic-positioning platform; (7) Division III Football Concussion Task Force; (8) student-athlete enrollment/athletics participation waiver for the 2021-22 academic year; (9) Division III legislative proposals in the cycle for the 2022 NCAA Convention; (10) resources and best practices available to help prevent sexual violence; and (11) LGBTQ recognition awards. 4. Division III Management Council update. Holly Sheilley provided an update from the Management Council’s recent meetings. 5. Division III Student-Athlete Advisory Committee update. Jaeden Peterson, from the Division III Student-Athlete Advisory Committee, sitting in for Bridgett Finn who was unable to attend, provided an update on behalf of the Division III SAAC that included the group’s ongoing review of issues related to student-athlete name, image and likeness, as well as the NCAA gender equity study.
    [Show full text]
  • Softball Conference Standings
    SOFTBALL CONFERENCE STANDINGS 2020 Division I Conference Standings 2 2020 Division II Conference Standings 5 2020 Division III Conference Standings 9 2020 DIVISION I CONFERENCE STANDINGS The 2020 season was not completed due to the COVID-19 pan- Atlantic 10 Conference demic; standings listed are at the time the season was canceled. Conference Full Season #Won conference tournament or playoff. $Reclassifying Team W L T Pct. W L T Pct. Ties computed as half win, half loss. George Washington 0 0 0 .000 10 14 0 .417 America East Conference St. Bonaventure 0 0 0 .000 2 3 0 .400 Dayton 0 0 0 .000 8 12 0 .400 Conference Full Season Saint Louis 0 0 0 .000 8 13 0 .381 Team W L T Pct. W L T Pct. George Mason 0 0 0 .000 7 12 0 .368 Stony Brook 0 0 0 .000 10 4 0 .714 Massachusetts 0 0 0 .000 4 7 0 .364 Hartford 0 0 0 .000 5 4 0 .556 Fordham 0 0 0 .000 7 13 0 .350 Albany (NY) 0 0 0 .000 6 5 0 .545 Saint Joseph’s 0 0 0 .000 4 11 0 .267 UMass Lowell 0 0 0 .000 7 9 0 .438 Rhode Island 0 0 0 .000 4 14 0 .222 UMBC 0 0 0 .000 5 9 0 .357 La Salle 0 0 0 .000 0 10 0 .000 Maine 0 0 0 .000 2 7 0 .222 Binghamton 0 0 0 .000 3 12 0 .200 Big East Conference Conference Full Season American Athletic Conference Team W L T Pct.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-21 Pre-Championship Manual
    2020-21 MANUAL NCAA General Administrative Guidelines Contents Section 1 • Introduction 2 Section 1•1 Definitions 2 Section 2 • Championship Core Statement 2 Section 3 • Concussion Management 3 Section 4 • Conduct 3 Section 4•1 Certification of Eligibility/Availability 3 Section 4•2 Drug Testing 4 Section 4•3 Honesty and Sportsmanship 4 Section 4•4 Misconduct/Failure to Adhere to Policies 4 Section 4•5 Sports Wagering Policy 4 Section 4•6 Student-Athlete Experience Survey 5 ™ Section 5 • Elite 90 Award 5 Section 6 • Fan Travel 5 Section 7 • Logo Policy 5 Section 8 • Research 6 Section 9 • Division III 6 Section 9•1 Division III Philosophy 6 Section 9•2 Commencement Conflicts 6 Section 9•3 Gameday the DIII Way 7 Section 9•4 Religious Conflicts 7 THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 6222 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6222 317-917-6222 ncaa.org November 2020 NCAA, NCAA logo, National Collegiate Athletic Association and Elite 90 are registered marks of the Association and use in any manner is prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the Association. NCAA PRE-CHAMPIONSHIP MANUALS 1 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES Section 1 • Introduction The Pre-Championship Manual will serve as a resource for institutions to prepare for the championship. This manual is divided into three sections: General Administrative Guidelines, Sport-Specific Information, and Appendixes. Sections one through eight apply to policies applicable to all 90 championships, while the remaining sections are sport specific. Section 1•1 Definitions Pre-championship Manual. Resource for institutions to prepare for the championship. Administrative Meeting. Pre-championship meeting for coaches and/or administrators.
    [Show full text]
  • Men's Soccer Conference Standings
    MEN’S SOCCER CONFERENCE STANDINGS 2019 Division I Conference Standings 2 2019 Division II Conference Standings 5 2019 Division III Conference Standings 8 All-Time Division I Conference Champions 14 2019 DIVISION I CONFERENCE STANDINGS America East Conference Atlantic 10 Conference Conference Full Season Conference Full Season Team W L T Pct. W L T Pct. Team W L T Pct. W L T Pct. #New Hampshire 5 1 1 .786 15 2 3 .825 #Rhode Island 7 1 0 .875 15 3 3 .786 Vermont 5 1 1 .786 11 6 1 .639 VCU 6 1 1 .813 7 8 3 .472 Hartford 4 2 1 .643 12 5 4 .667 Dayton 6 2 0 .750 13 8 0 .619 Albany (NY) 4 3 0 .571 10 6 1 .618 Saint Louis 6 2 0 .750 8 8 1 .500 UMass Lowell 3 4 0 .429 8 9 1 .472 Fordham 5 2 1 .688 7 10 3 .425 Binghamton 3 4 0 .429 6 9 3 .417 La Salle 4 4 0 .500 8 8 1 .500 UMBC 1 5 1 .214 6 9 1 .406 Duquesne 3 5 0 .375 8 8 1 .500 Stony Brook 1 6 0 .143 4 11 2 .294 Massachusetts 3 5 0 .375 7 10 0 .412 George Washington 3 5 0 .375 5 11 1 .324 American Athletic Conference George Mason 3 5 0 .375 4 12 1 .265 Davidson 3 5 0 .375 4 10 2 .313 Conference Full Season Saint Joseph’s 1 7 0 .125 5 12 1 .306 Team W L T Pct.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Soccer Conference Standings
    WOMEN’S SOCCER CONFERENCE STANDINGS 2019 Division I Conference Standings 2 2019 Division II Conference Standings 6 2019 Division III Conference Standings 10 All-Time Division I Conference Champions 16 2019 DIVISION I CONFERENCE STANDINGS America East Conference Atlantic 10 Conference Conference Full Season Conference Full Season Team W L T Pct. W L T Pct. Team W L T Pct. W L T Pct. Stony Brook# 6 1 1 .813 14 6 1 .690 Saint Louis# 9 0 1 .950 17 4 2 .783 Albany (NY) 6 1 1 .813 9 6 3 .583 George Washington 7 1 2 .800 14 3 4 .762 Hartford 5 2 1 .688 10 7 2 .579 Massachusetts 6 3 1 .650 10 6 3 .605 New Hampshire 5 3 0 .625 10 8 0 .556 La Salle 6 4 0 .600 11 8 1 .575 Binghamton 4 3 1 .563 10 6 2 .611 Dayton 5 3 2 .600 7 9 3 .447 UMass Lowell 3 4 1 .438 4 11 2 .294 Fordham 4 4 2 .500 5 11 4 .350 Vermont 1 6 2 .222 3 10 3 .281 Duquesne 4 5 1 .450 6 8 3 .441 Maine 1 6 1 .188 5 8 1 .393 Saint Joseph’s 4 5 1 .450 7 10 2 .421 UMBC 1 7 0 .125 2 13 2 .176 Richmond 4 6 0 .400 7 9 2 .444 VCU 3 5 2 .400 9 6 3 .583 American Athletic Conference Davidson 3 5 2 .400 8 8 3 .500 Conference Full Season St.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Atlantic East Policies & Procedures
    Policies and Procedures 2020-21 Introduction Last updated February 11, 2021 The Atlantic East Conference looks to pursue practice and/or competition opportunities for all student-athletes during the spring semester of 2021. Each athletic department continues to work closely with key University stakeholders. The health and welfare of our student-athletes, athletic departments and campus communities continue to be the priority. This document contains an outline for what will and will not be allowed within the Atlantic East Conference during the spring semester. All plans in this document are subject to change based on new and emerging information. Health and Safety Protocols Under expert guidance and oversight from Team Physicians, sports medicine staff and Student Health Services providers, the Atlantic East has developed health and safety protocols based around 3 guiding principles: testing, risk minimization, and positive test response standards. In collaboration with sports medicine personnel, athletic administrators and coaches, additional risk minimization strategies have been developed for all spring sports and officials. 1. Testing A. Strategies Testing strategies are designed to be directed toward student-athletes and athletics personnel who have regular, close contact with student-athletes. This group of individuals is considered Tier 1, which is the highest exposure tier. Following is a summary explanation of Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 risk categories, which is based on information in a recently published scientific article in the British Journal of Sports Medicine. Tier 1: This is the highest exposure tier and consists of individuals for whom physical distancing and face coverings are not possible or effective during athletic training or competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Volleyball Conference Standings
    WOMEN’S VOLLEYBALL CONFERENCE STANDINGS 2018 Division I Conference Standings 2 2018 Division II Conference Standings 5 2018 Division III Conference Standings 8 2018 DIVISION I CONFERENCE STANDINGS #Conference tournament champion; Atlantic Sun Big South Conference &Automatic bid by virtue of conference record (no tournament); ^Reclassifying Conference Conference Full Season member; *Provisional member. Conference Full Season Team W L Pct. W L Pct. High Point# 14 2 .875 21 10 .677 America East Team W L Pct. W L Pct. FGCU# 15 1 .938 27 7 .794 Radford 12 4 .750 22 7 .759 Conference Kennesaw St. 14 2 .875 24 7 .774 Winthrop 11 5 .688 16 14 .533 UNC Asheville 10 6 .625 16 12 .571 Conference Full Season Lipscomb 12 4 .750 18 12 .600 USC UpSt. 8 8 .500 13 19 .406 Team W L Pct. W L Pct. Liberty 10 6 .625 15 17 .469 Stetson 8 8 .500 16 13 .552 Charleston So. 8 8 .500 13 12 .520 Stony Brook# 12 0 1.000 21 8 .724 North Florida 6 10 .375 11 22 .333 Campbell 7 9 .438 9 17 .346 Albany 9 3 .750 16 11 .593 Jacksonville 3 13 .188 5 24 .172 Presbyterian 7 9 .438 10 17 .370 New Hampshire 8 4 .667 12 15 .444 North Ala. 2 14 .125 4 21 .160 Hampton 2 14 .125 8 19 .296 Hartford 4 8 .333 11 14 .440 NJIT 2 14 .125 4 28 .125 Garner-Webb 1 15 .063 7 22 .241 UMBC 3 9 .250 7 19 .269 Binghamton 3 9 .250 5 20 .200 Atlantic 10 Conference Big Ten Conference Umass Lowell 3 9 .250 5 21 .192 Conference Full Season Conference Full Season American Athletic Team W L Pct.
    [Show full text]
  • Athletic Mission Statement
    MISSION STATEMENT Marywood University, sponsored by the Congregation of the Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, roots itself in the Catholic intellectual tradition, the principle of justice, and the belief that education empowers people. The University integrates an enduring liberal arts tradition and professional disciplines to create a comprehensive learning experience. Our undergraduate and graduate programs promote academic excellence, advance innovative scholarship, and foster leadership in service to others. Within a welcoming and supportive community, Marywood challenges individuals of all backgrounds to achieve their full potential and make choices based on spiritual and ethical values. Marywood University prepares students to seek sustainable solutions for the common good and educates global citizens to live responsibly in an interdependent world. The Marywood University athletic program is an integral part of the educational process. Its purpose is to provide the student-athlete with opportunities for development of personal skills and to promote competition, sportsmanship and teamwork in an environment that is enjoyable, fair and diverse The health and well being of all student-athletes is prioritized as is the equitable treatment of men and women. At Marywood, we believe that athletics, along with other activities, contribute to preparation for the total life experience. Many student-athlete services and programs are offered that contribute to this life preparation inclusive of value attainment and self-growth. Marywood is a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division III institution, a member of the Atlantic East Conference, the Eastern College Athletic Conference, the Landmark Conference (Women’s Golf) and the Mid-Atlantic Rugby Conference (Men’s & Women’s Rugby).
    [Show full text]
  • The NCAA News Staff NCAA from Levying Sanctions Schultr in Urging the Committee to Posed Upon a Member Institution
    Official Publication of the National Collegiate Athletic Association February 26,1992, Volume 29 Number 9 Basketball revenue distributior I slated Checks totaling $3 I .5 million million distributed in 1991, the valur from the haskctball fund of the per unit will be slightly smaller this NCAA revenue-distribution plan year, NCAA Associate Exccutivc will be mailed to the Division I Director Louis J. Spry said. membership April 24. The units represent the number l’hc revenue plan distributes of games played by members of money from the NCAA’s seven- each confcrcncc in the NCAA Divi- year, $1 billion television contract sion I Men’s Basketball Champion- with CBS to the membership ship over the prcccding six years. through six diffcrcnt funds. The ‘l’hc 1991 distribution reflected total distributed in 1992 will be tournament appearances from 1985 $75,425,000. to 1990. In that period, the value of Although the 1992 basketball each unit was made larger because fund is slightly larger than the $3 I .25 See Ruskc~rhall rcwcwur, page I5 Revenue-distribution funds The amount of money m each fund in the 1992 NCAA revenue-distribution p/an and when the checks wilt be mailed: Fund Total Date Basketball $31.5 mllllon April 24 Division II $2 million May 22 Sports safety Academic enhancement $7.425 million June 26 Needy student-athlete $3 million July 31 Kathy D. Clark of the University of Idaho makes a point for DE Paul II! Gikas (background) of the University of Michigan and other members of the NCAA Committee on Competitive $10 5 million August 14 Sports sponsorshlp Safizguards and Mediwl Aspects of Spotts.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Ncaa Division Iii Women's Lacrosse
    REPORT OF THE NCAA DIVISION III WOMEN’S LACROSSE COMMITTEE MAY & JUNE 2020, MEETING ACTION ITEMS. 1. Legislative items. • None. 2. Nonlegislative items. a. Conference automatic qualification. (1) Recommendation. That the following conferences receive automatic qualification to the 2019 NCAA Division III Women’s Lacrosse Championship: Atlantic East Conference; Capital Athletic Conference; Centennial Conference; College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin; Colonial States Athletic Conference; Commonwealth Coast Conference; Empire 8; Great Northeast Athletic Conference; Heartland Collegiate Women’s Lacrosse Conference; Landmark Conference; Liberty League; Little East Conference; Massachusetts State Collegiate Athletic Conference; Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association; Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth; Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom; Midwest Women’s Lacrosse Conference; New England Collegiate Conference; New England Small College Athletic Conference; New England Women’s and Men’s Athletic Conference; New Jersey Athletic Conference; North Atlantic Conference; North Coast Athletic Conference; North Eastern Athletic Conference; Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference; Northwest Conference; Ohio Athletic Conference; Old Dominion Athletic Conference; Presidents’ Athletic Conference; Skyline Conference; Southern Athletic Association; Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conference; State University of New York Athletic Conference; and USA South Athletic Conference. Projected pool allocations Pool A – 34 Pool B – 0 Pool
    [Show full text]
  • DIII Champs May 7 Teleconference
    REPORT OF THE NCAA DIVISION III CHAMPIONSHIPS COMMITTEE MAY 7, 2020, VIDEOCONFERENCE ACTION ITEMS. • None. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS. 1. Welcome and announcements. Championships Committee chair Kiki Jacobs welcomed the group to the videoconference and reviewed the agenda. 2. Approval of recent reports. The committee approved the report from its April 27 videoconference as presented. 3. Women’s Soccer Committee report. The committee approved the following 43 conferences to receive automatic qualification to the 2020 Division III Women’s Soccer Championship: Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference; American Rivers Conference; American Southwest Conference; Atlantic East Conference, Capital Athletic Conference; Centennial Conference; City University of New York Athletic Conference; College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin; Colonial States Athletic Conference; Commonwealth Coast Conference; Empire 8; Great Northeast Athletic Conference; Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference; Landmark Conference; Liberty League; Little East Conference; Massachusetts State Collegiate Athletic Conference; Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth; Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom; Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association; Midwest Conference; Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference; New England Collegiate Conference; New England Small College Athletic Conference; New England Women’s and Men’s Athletic Conference; New Jersey Athletic Conference; North Atlantic Conference; North Coast Athletic Conference; North Eastern Athletic Conference; Northern
    [Show full text]
  • NCAA Division III Intercollegiate Athletics Corporate Sponsorships: a Systems Theory Approach
    Journal of Physical Education and Sport ® (JPES), Vol. 21 (3), Art 201, pp. 1594 - 1606, May 2021 online ISSN: 2247 - 806X; p-ISSN: 2247 – 8051; ISSN - L = 2247 - 8051 © JPES Original Article NCAA Division III Intercollegiate Athletics Corporate Sponsorships: a systems theory approach ROBERT ZULLO Sports Management, Westminster College, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Published online: May 31, 2021 (Accepted for publication May 15, 2021) DOI:10.7752/jpes.2021.03202 Abstract Within Division I intercollegiate athletics, many schools outsource their multi-media and sponsorship efforts to bolster their revenue (Johnson, 2005; Maestas, 2020). At the Division I level, outsourcing presents challenges as utilization of a third-party firm can lead to loss of control by athletic administration. The problem statement for this study is whether similar management issues are prevalent within corporate sponsorships at the Division III level of intercollegiate athletics, examining if systems theory could enhance efficiency. This research approach utilizes a survey to ask 50 Division III athletic directors if they engage in corporate sponsorships, who is responsible for overseeing corporate sponsorships at their school, which staff are permitted to solicit businesses and do concerns arise. Applying the results to systems theory, the implications lead to conclusions and recommendations to assist Division III athletic departments better develop this revenue stream. The research also contributes to filling a void in the existing literature within Division III corporate sponsorships. Key Words – NCAA, Division III, Corporate Sponsorship, Revenue, Systems Theory Introduction Sponsors are affiliated with athletic departments, athletic conferences, athletic facilities, and athletic events, including post-season competition hosted by the NCAA and other entities, as a means to generate revenue and reduce expenses (Chen & Zhang, 2011; Covell, 2001; Hobson & Rich, 2015; Jensen &Caneja, 2018; Krisel, 2005; Lee, 2000; Stotlar &Kadlecek, 1993; Tomasini et al., 2004; Weight et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]