18 June 2008 VALUATION of PALESTINIAN REFUGEE LOSSES

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

18 June 2008 VALUATION of PALESTINIAN REFUGEE LOSSES VALUATION OF PALESTINIAN REFUGEE LOSSES A Study Based on the National Wealth of Palestine in 1948 Thierry J. Sene chal 18 June 2008 Page 2 of 260 Contact information: Thierry J. Senechal [email protected] Tel. +33 6 24 28 51 11 This report is established by request of the Negotiations Support Unit (NSU), Negotiations Affairs Department of the PLO/Palestinian Authority. The views expressed in this report are those of the Advisor and in no way reflect the official opinion of the commissioning unit. This report has been prepared for the use of the NSU in connection with its estimation of Palestinian Refugees’ losses arising out of the 1948 war and should not be used by other parties or for other purposes. The views expressed in the following review are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of the NSU. The author would like to express his gratitude to Philippe de Mijolla for his continuous support on this project. Privileged and Confidential Thierry Senechal, 18 June 2008 Page 3 of 260 STRATEGIC SUMMARY of this study) can make an informed OBJECTIVES assessment of the level of judgment (if any) that has been used in deriving values. In addition, a full audit trail is integral to study. This report forms the third phase of a project which provides a quantification of In Section 1 of the report, we introduced the aggregate value of losses incurred by the scope of reference of our work and key Palestinian Arab refugees as a result of their findings from our initial review of past forced displacement from what is now estimates. In Section 2, we presented an known as Israel, following military action analysis of Palestinian wealth in 1948 based during the years 1947 and 1948. We aimed on the national income approach. We to provide a comprehensive view of a full concluded that such approach is not useful range of financial losses suffered by to provide a global assessment of approximately three quarters of a million Palestinian refugee losses but can be used Palestinian people so displaced. to determine a minimum bound for negotiations. Whereas the ultimate solution of the, hitherto intractable, right of return and/or In Section 3, we have introduced compensation issue would require fundamental adjustment principles, e.g. negotiations between Israelis and number of refugees, scope of land to be Palestinians, our objective has been to included (falling outside the Armistice Line), provide Palestinian negotiators with a number of Arabs remaining in Israel in 1948, reasoned, realistic and independent land sales in pre war years, growth rate of aggregate financial valuation. national income, and exchange rate determination. METHODOLOGY VALUATION FINDINGS In order to provide a manageable assessment of the wide range of aggregate We set out below a summary of the findings financial losses incurred by Palestinian of each of the loss types reviewed. refugees, we have broken down the present study into seven separate categories of loss. VALUATION OF RURAL LAND Each component has been separately Section 4 aimed at valuing losses incurred identified and defined, and then quantified by Palestinian Arab refugees from the 1948 using its own specially developed and war in terms of rural land and rural specific valuation methodology, always buildings. In the 60 years that have passed, rooted firmly in international valuation the issues and questions of reparation for standards. this loss have been much debated and many attempts at valuation have been made by We have taken care to report, in a various groups or individuals such as the transparent manner, the rationale and United Nations Conciliation Commission for functionality of our methods so that Palestine, the Israeli State itself, the Arab experienced negotiators (the intended users League and private academic researchers. Privileged and Confidential Thierry Senechal, 18 June 2008 Page 4 of 260 recognized that a loss took place in respect As we find it, the overall loss of rural of income forgone due to loss of jobs and property by the 1948 refugees represented complementary inputs over a finite horizon. a grand total of £P398 221 800 (in 1948 This constituted a legitimate grievance that values). This value has been calculated by had to be included in our comprehensive aggregating results for the following types assessment of Palestinian refugee losses. of immovable property: rural land for £P236 716 172 (excluding Beersheba sub- The loss of employment and livelihood district); Village built-up areas for £P6 represented a grand total of £P122,739,012 249 669 (land and buildings); and Beersheba (in 1948 value). We had to develop two sub-district land for £P155 255 959. distinct methodologies to assess the loss of employment and the loss of livelihood. We VALUATION OF URBAN PROPERTY have assumed that 25% of the Palestinian In section 5, we have been reviewing population was fully employed in the information on urban land holdings and economy and therefore was entitled to a buildings in Palestine in 1947. We arrived at compensation for the loss of employment, a total value of £P126,830,885 (in 1948 the remaining 75% being compensated for value). This figure has been obtained as the loss of livelihood. At this stage, we have follows: £P20,674,429 (urban land) plus computed the loss of finite time periods £P140,497,816 (Urban buildings) minus that will need to be discussed in great £P34,341,360 (deduction for sale of length. property from Arabs to Jews 1945-1947). It should be noted that construction costs VALUATION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY AND information has been found to help value MOVABLE ASSETS urban buildings in pre war Palestine. In Section 8, an estimation of losses by Palestinian Arab refugees of movable assets VALUATION OF HOLY PLACES has been presented. Parameters in respect In Section 6, we have valued holy places. of livestock, private vehicles, commodities, The loss of such property represents a grand foreign assets and household chattels total of £P 1,602,280 (in 1948 price). It should owned by Palestinian Arabs and their be noted that such exercise has not been consequent loss have been provided on the performed in the past by Arab or Israel basis of historical data. We arrived at an valuers. This was therefore a first attempt aggregate figure of £P44,853,524 (in 1948 to derive a value for real estate associated values) broken down as follows: to a religious purpose. We were satisfied 1. £P5,072,520 (1948) in livestock and with information obtained regarding the agricultural implements scope of loss holy places and we have 2. £P235,534 (1948) in private vehicles designed a valuation protocol from official 3. £P1,765,265 (1948) in commodities construction costs data obtained in Section 4. £P14,542,770 (1948) in foreign assets 5. 5. £P23,237,435 (1948) in clothing and household chattels. VALUATION OF THE LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT AND LIVELIHOOD (LOST OPPORTUNITIES ) In our valuation, we have assumed that Section 7 provided a valuation of refugees have left behind all their employment and livelihood losses of properties. We understand the past valuers Palestinian Arab refugees. We have been have proposed ratios for property left concerned with the notion of lost behind, i.e. Prof. A. Kubursi arguing that opportunities rather than psychological refugees had taken with them half of their damage. In carrying out our valuation of the property. However there is no basis to loss of employment and livelihood, we have justify such ratio and we have decided to Privileged and Confidential Thierry Senechal, 18 June 2008 Page 5 of 260 assumed, unless proved otherwise, that all Section when additional information is movable property has been lost. obtained. VALUATION OF BUSINESS LOSSES Section 9 attempted to value the loss of GLOBAL ESTIMATE AND PRESENT DAY income-producing business property VALUATION suffered by Palestinian Arabs as a result of the 1948 war. At the end of 1947, Palestine’s overall economy was healthy, We can summarize the findings of our especially when compared to other assessment as follows: countries still suffering from the effects of Value in World War Two. The industrial sector as a Loss Value in £P Section USD 1948 at category 1948 whole was predominantly Jewish, Arabs 4.0319/£P being mostly involved in agriculture, milling grain, tobacco manufacturing and parts of Sect 4 Rural land 398,221,800 1,605,590,475 the textile and metal industries. Enumeration of national wealth has been Sect 5 Urban land 126,830,885 511,369,445 carried out in pre war Palestine. Sect 6 Holy places 1,602,280 6,460,233 We estimated that the value of Palestinian Loss of income-producing property at £P85,516,266 Sect 7 employment 122,739,012 494,871,422 and livelihood (in 1948 value). Of course, special care has Personal property and been exercised to distinguish the shares of Sect 8 44,853,524 180,844,923 movable Arabs and Jews. Information has been assets obtained for small enterprises, hotels and Business Sect 9 85,516,266 344,793,033 restaurant, commerce and construction losses businesses, laundries and small workshops Arab share of Sect 10 state-owned 37,062,985 149,434,249 which were predominantly Arab-owned. At property this stage of our review, we could not TOTAL 816,826,752 3,293,363,781 identify the Palestinian share of large industrial companies. The total value of Palestinian refugee losses VALUATION OF STATE -OWNED PROPERTY in 1948 has been assessed at £P816,826,752 State-owned property was a significant part or USD3,293,363,781. of the Palestinian economy. Infrastructure such as roads, railways and seaports, as well In the last section (Section 11), we have as postal services and telecommunications examined the possible methods of adjusting played a crucial role in mobilizing the the value of losses to reflect current day factors of production facilitating economic monetary values.
Recommended publications
  • Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2010 - 2012 Volume VII
    BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights is an independent, community-based non- This edition of the Survey of Palestinian Survey of Palestinian Refugees and profit organization mandated to defend Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons BADIL Internally Displaced Persons 2010-2012 and promote the rights of Palestinian (Volume VII) focuses on Palestinian Vol VII 2010-2012 refugees and Internally Displaced Persons Survey of refugees and IDPs. Our vision, mission, 124 Pages, 30 c.m. (IDPs) in the period between 2010 and ISSN: 1728-1679 programs and relationships are defined 2012. Statistical data and estimates of the by our Palestinian identity and the size of this population have been updated Palestinian Refugees principles of international law, in in accordance with figures as of the end Editor: Nidal al-Azza particular international human rights of 2011. This edition includes for the first law. We seek to advance the individual time an opinion poll surveying Palestinian Editorial Team: Amjad Alqasis, Simon and collective rights of the Palestinian refugees regarding specific humanitarian and Randles, Manar Makhoul, Thayer Hastings, services they receive in the refugee Noura Erakat people on this basis. camps. Demographic Statistics: Mustafa Khawaja BADIL Resource Center was established The need to overview and contextualize in January 1998. BADIL is registered Palestinian refugees and (IDPs) - 64 Internally Displaced Persons Layout & Design: Atallah Salem with the Palestinan Authority and years since the Palestinian Nakba Printing: Al-Ayyam Printing, Press, (Catastrophe) and 45 years since Israel’s legally owned by the refugee community Publishing and Distribution Conmpany represented by a General Assembly belligerent occupation of the West Bank, including eastern Jerusalem, and the 2010 - 2012 composed of activists in Palestinian Gaza Strip - is derived from the necessity national institutions and refugee to set the foundations for a human rights- community organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine (5A3ette
    XLbe Palestine (5a3ette Ipubltebeb b^ Hutbority No. 632 THURSDAY, 24TH SEPTEMBER, 1936 949 CONTENTS Page BILL PUBLISHED FOR INFORMATION ־ Pensions (Palestine Gendarmerie) Ordinance, 1936 - - 951 ORDINANCES CONFIRMED ־ - ־ Confirmation of Ordinances Nos. 44 and 57 of 1936 953 GOVERNMENT NOTICES Appointments, etc. - 953 Obituary ------ 954 Sittings of Court of Criminal Assize - 954 Sale of State Domain in Tiberias - - - - 955 Augmented Air Mail Service to Iraq, Iran and Iranian Gulf Ports - - 955 Tender and Adjudication of Contract - 956 Citation Orders - - - - - 956 Bankruptcy 957 EETURNS Quarantine and Infectious Diseases Summary - 95V Financial Statement at the 31st May, 1936 - - - - 958 Statement of Assets and Liabilities at the 31st May, 1936 - - - 960 Persons entering and leaving Palestine during August, 1936 - - 962 Persons changing their Names - 964 REGISTRATION OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, ETC. - 965 CORRIGENDA - - - - .958 SUPPLEMENT No. 2. The following subsidiary legislation is published in Supplement No. 2 which forms part of this Gazette:— Court Fees (Amendment) Rules, 1936, under the Courts Ordinances, 1924-1935, and the ־ - - Magistrates' Courts Jurisdiction Ordinance, 1935 1119 Tariffs for the Transport of Goods under the Government Railways Ordinance, 1936 1120 {Continued) PRICE 30 MILS. CONTENTS {Continued) Page Curfew Order in respect of certain Areas within the Jerusalem District, under the ׳ Emergency Regulations, 1936 - - - 1122 Curfew Orders in respect of the Railway Formations in the Northern District, under the Emergency Regulations, 1936 . 1123 Curfew Orders in respect of the Town Planning Area of Nablus, Jenin—Deir-Sharaf— Tulkarm—Qalqilia Road, Nablus—Jerusalem Road and Municipal Areas of Acre, Jenin and Tulkarm, under the Emergency Regulations, 1936 - 1124 Rules under the Forests Ordinance, 1926, regarding the Forest Ranger at Zikhron Ya'aqov ------ !127 Notice under the Customs Ordinance, 1929, approving a General Bonded Warehouse ־ at the Levant Fair Grounds, Tel Aviv 1127 Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration of Eretz Yisrael Arabs Between December 1, 1947 and June 1, 1948
    [Intelligence Service (Arab Section)] June 30, 1948 Migration of Eretz Yisrael Arabs between December 1, 1947 and June 1, 1948 Contents 1. General introduction. 2. Basic figures on Arab migration 3. National phases of evacuation and migration 4. Causes of Arab migration 5. Arab migration trajectories and absorption issues Annexes 1. Regional reviews analyzing migration issues in each area [Missing from document] 2. Charts of villages evacuated by area, noting the causes for migration and migration trajectories for every village General introduction The purpose of this overview is to attempt to evaluate the intensity of the migration and its various development phases, elucidate the different factors that impacted population movement directly and assess the main migration trajectories. Of course, given the nature of statistical figures in Eretz Yisrael in general, which are, in themselves, deficient, it would be difficult to determine with certainty absolute numbers regarding the migration movement, but it appears that the figures provided herein, even if not certain, are close to the truth. Hence, a margin of error of ten to fifteen percent needs to be taken into account. The figures on the population in the area that lies outside the State of Israel are less accurate, and the margin of error is greater. This review summarizes the situation up until June 1st, 1948 (only in one case – the evacuation of Jenin, does it include a later occurrence). Basic figures on Arab population movement in Eretz Yisrael a. At the time of the UN declaration [resolution] regarding the division of Eretz Yisrael, the following figures applied within the borders of the Hebrew state: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2014 Al-Malih Shaqed Kh
    Salem Zabubah Ram-Onn Rummanah The West Bank Ta'nak Ga-Taybah Um al-Fahm Jalameh / Mqeibleh G Silat 'Arabunah Settlements and the Separation Barrier al-Harithiya al-Jalameh 'Anin a-Sa'aidah Bet She'an 'Arrana G 66 Deir Ghazala Faqqu'a Kh. Suruj 6 kh. Abu 'Anqar G Um a-Rihan al-Yamun ! Dahiyat Sabah Hinnanit al-Kheir Kh. 'Abdallah Dhaher Shahak I.Z Kfar Dan Mashru' Beit Qad Barghasha al-Yunis G November 2014 al-Malih Shaqed Kh. a-Sheikh al-'Araqah Barta'ah Sa'eed Tura / Dhaher al-Jamilat Um Qabub Turah al-Malih Beit Qad a-Sharqiyah Rehan al-Gharbiyah al-Hashimiyah Turah Arab al-Hamdun Kh. al-Muntar a-Sharqiyah Jenin a-Sharqiyah Nazlat a-Tarem Jalbun Kh. al-Muntar Kh. Mas'ud a-Sheikh Jenin R.C. A'ba al-Gharbiyah Um Dar Zeid Kafr Qud 'Wadi a-Dabi Deir Abu Da'if al-Khuljan Birqin Lebanon Dhaher G G Zabdah לבנון al-'Abed Zabdah/ QeiqisU Ya'bad G Akkabah Barta'ah/ Arab a-Suweitat The Rihan Kufeirit רמת Golan n 60 הגולן Heights Hadera Qaffin Kh. Sab'ein Um a-Tut n Imreihah Ya'bad/ a-Shuhada a a G e Mevo Dotan (Ganzour) n Maoz Zvi ! Jalqamus a Baka al-Gharbiyah r Hermesh Bir al-Basha al-Mutilla r e Mevo Dotan al-Mughayir e t GNazlat 'Isa Tannin i a-Nazlah G d Baqah al-Hafira e The a-Sharqiya Baka al-Gharbiyah/ a-Sharqiyah M n a-Nazlah Araba Nazlat ‘Isa Nazlat Qabatiya הגדה Westהמערבית e al-Wusta Kh.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report #4
    Fellow engineers Annual Report #4 Program Name: Local Government & Infrastructure (LGI) Program Country: West Bank & Gaza Donor: USAID Award Number: 294-A-00-10-00211-00 Reporting Period: October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014 Submitted To: Tony Rantissi / AOR / USAID West Bank & Gaza Submitted By: Lana Abu Hijleh / Country Director/ Program Director / LGI 1 Program Information Name of Project1 Local Government & Infrastructure (LGI) Program Country and regions West Bank & Gaza Donor USAID Award number/symbol 294-A-00-10-00211-00 Start and end date of project September 30, 2010 – September 30, 2015 Total estimated federal funding $100,000,000 Contact in Country Lana Abu Hijleh, Country Director/ Program Director VIP 3 Building, Al-Balou’, Al-Bireh +972 (0)2 241-3616 [email protected] Contact in U.S. Barbara Habib, Program Manager 8601 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800, Silver Spring, MD USA +1 301 587-4700 [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations …………………………………….………… 4 Program Description………………………………………………………… 5 Executive Summary…………………………………………………..…...... 7 Emergency Humanitarian Aid to Gaza……………………………………. 17 Implementation Activities by Program Objective & Expected Results 19 Objective 1 …………………………………………………………………… 24 Objective 2 ……………………................................................................ 42 Mainstreaming Green Elements in LGI Infrastructure Projects…………. 46 Objective 3…………………………………………………........................... 56 Impact & Sustainability for Infrastructure and Governance ……............
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Trace Fazal Sheikh
    MEMORY TRACE FAZAL SHEIKH 2 3 Front and back cover image: ‚ ‚ 31°50 41”N / 35°13 47”E Israeli side of the Separation Wall on the outskirts of Neve Yaakov and Beit Ḥanīna. Just beyond the wall lies the neighborhood of al-Ram, now severed from East Jerusalem. Inside front and inside back cover image: ‚ ‚ 31°49 10”N / 35°15 59”E Palestinian side of the Separation Wall on the outskirts of the Palestinian town of ʿAnata. The Israeli settlement of Pisgat Ze’ev lies beyond in East Jerusalem. This publication takes its point of departure from Fazal Sheikh’s Memory Trace, the first of his three-volume photographic proj- ect on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Published in the spring of 2015, The Erasure Trilogy is divided into three separate vol- umes—Memory Trace, Desert Bloom, and Independence/Nakba. The project seeks to explore the legacies of the Arab–Israeli War of 1948, which resulted in the dispossession and displacement of three quarters of the Palestinian population, in the establishment of the State of Israel, and in the reconfiguration of territorial borders across the region. Elements of these volumes have been exhibited at the Slought Foundation in Philadelphia, Storefront for Art and Architecture, the Brooklyn Museum of Art, and the Pace/MacGill Gallery in New York, and will now be presented at the Al-Ma’mal Foundation for Contemporary Art in East Jerusalem, and the Khalil Sakakini Cultural Center in Ramallah. In addition, historical documents and materials related to the history of Al-’Araqīb, a Bedouin village that has been destroyed and rebuilt more than one hundred times in the ongoing “battle over the Negev,” first presented at the Slought Foundation, will be shown at Al-Ma’mal.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel 2019 International Religious Freedom Report
    ISRAEL 2019 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary This section covers Israel, including Jerusalem. In December 2017, the United States recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. It is the position of the United States that the specific boundaries of Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem are subject to final status negotiations between the parties. The Palestinian Authority (PA) exercises no authority over Jerusalem. In March 2019, the United States recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. A report on the West Bank and Gaza, including areas subject to the jurisdiction of the PA, is appended at the end of this report. The country’s laws and Supreme Court rulings protect the freedoms of conscience, faith, religion, and worship, regardless of an individual’s religious affiliation, and the 1992 “Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty” protects additional individual rights. In 2018, the Knesset passed the “Basic Law: Israel – The Nation State of the Jewish People.” According to the government, that “law determines, among other things, that the Land of Israel is the historical homeland of the Jewish people; the State of Israel is the nation state of the Jewish People, in which it realizes its natural, cultural, religious and historical right to self-determination; and exercising the right to national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish People.” The government continued to allow controlled access to religious sites, including the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif (the site containing the foundation of the first and second Jewish temple and the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa Mosque).
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005
    Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005 BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights i BADIL is a member of the Global Palestine Right of Return Coalition Preface The Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons is published annually by BADIL Resource Center. The Survey provides an overview of one of the largest and longest-standing unresolved refugee and displaced populations in the world today. It is estimated that two out of every five of today’s refugees are Palestinian. The Survey has several objectives: (1) It aims to provide basic information about Palestinian displacement – i.e., the circumstances of displacement, the size and characteristics of the refugee and displaced population, as well as the living conditions of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons; (2) It aims to clarify the framework governing protection and assistance for this displaced population; and (3) It sets out the basic principles for crafting durable solutions for Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, consistent with international law, relevant United Nations Resolutions and best practice. In short, the Survey endeavors to address the lack of information or misinformation about Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, and to counter political arguments that suggest that the issue of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons can be resolved outside the realm of international law and practice applicable to all other refugee and displaced populations. The Survey examines the status of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons on a thematic basis. Chapter One provides a short historical background to the root causes of Palestinian mass displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Nakba – Flucht Und Vertreibung Der Palästinenser 1948
    Die Nakba FLUCHT UND VERTREIBUNG DER PALÄSTINENSER 1948 „… eine derart schmerzhafte Reise in die Vergangenheit ist der einzige Weg nach vorn, wenn wir eine bessere Zukunft für uns alle, Palästinenser wie Israelis, schaffen wollen.“ Ilan Pappe, israelischer Historiker Gestaltung: Philipp Rumpf & Sarah Veith Inhalt und Konzeption der Ausstellung: gefördert durch Flüchtlingskinder im Libanon e.V. www.lib-hilfe.de © Flüchtlingskinder im Libanon e.V. 1 VON DEN ERSTEN JÜDISCHEN EINWANDERERN BIS ZUR BALFOUR-ERKLÄRUNG 1917 Karte 1: DER ZIONISMUS ENTSTEHT Topographische Karte von Palästina LIBANON 01020304050 km Die Wurzeln des Palästina-Problems liegen im ausgehenden 19. Jahrhundert, als Palästina unter 0m Akko Safed SYRIEN Teil des Osmanischen Reiches war. Damals entwickelte sich in Europa der jüdische Natio- 0m - 200m 200m - 400m Haifa 400m - 800m nalismus, der so genannte Zionismus. Der Vater des politischen Zionismus war der öster- Nazareth reichisch-ungarische Jude Theodor Herzl. Auf dem ersten Zionistenkongress 1897 in Basel über 800m Stadt wurde die Idee des Zionismus nicht nur auf eine breite Grundlage gestellt, sondern es Jenin Beisan wurden bereits Institutionen ins Leben gerufen, die für die Einwanderung von Juden nach Palästina werben und sie organisieren sollten. Tulkarm Qalqilyah Nablus MITTELMEER Der Zionismus war u.a. eine Antwort auf den europäischen Antisemitismus (Dreyfuß-Affäre) und auf die Pogrome vor allem im zaristischen Russ- Jaffa land. Die Einwanderung von Juden nach Palästina erhielt schon frühzeitig einen systematischen, organisatorischen Rahmen. Wichtigste Institution Lydda JORDANIEN Ramleh Ramallah wurde der 1901 gegründete Jüdische Nationalfond, der für die Anwerbung von Juden in aller Welt, für den Ankauf von Land in Palästina, meist von Jericho arabischen Großgrundbesitzern, und für die Zuteilung des Bodens an die Einwanderer zuständig war.
    [Show full text]
  • A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Copyright © 2021 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2021 ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Map .................................................................................................................................. i Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions of Apartheid and Persecution .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Comparative Legal Histories Workshop
    Department of Sociology Comparative Legal Histories Workshop: Colonial/Postcolonial India and Mandatory Palestine/Israel Stanford Law School Faculty Lounge June 6, 2011 Description In recent years, an impressive body of scholarship has emerged on colonial legal history. Some of this work has focused on Indian and Israeli legal history. While both contemporary Indian and Israeli law are in some senses a product of English law, many additional legal sources, including religious and customary law, have played a significant role in shaping the corpus of law in both countries. This history has yielded complex pluralistic legal orders which faced, and still face, similar problems, including the ongoing effects of the British colonial legacy and postcolonial partition, tensions between secularism and religion, and also the desire to absorb universalizing western culture while maintaining some elements of tradition. The goal of our workshop is to bring together a group of legal historians interested in comparative colonial histories who are studying different aspects of the history of Indian and Israeli law. The workshop will be a one-day informal gathering that would combine a discussion of trends in comparative colonial legal history with an opportunity for participants to present their research projects. Our objective is to create a forum where legal historians who may not necessarily be in dialogue with one another can interact, exchange ideas, and perhaps even begin collaborative research projects. The workshop is organized by Assaf Likhovski (Tel Aviv University) Renisa Mawani (UBC) and Mitra Sharafi (UW Law School). It is funded by the David Berg Institute for Law and History at Tel Aviv University, the Institute for Legal Studies, University of Wisconsin Law School, and the Department of Sociology at the University of British Columbia, and hosted by Stanford Law School.
    [Show full text]