Papers in Press

“Papers in Press” includes peer-reviewed, accepted manuscripts of research articles, reviews, and short notes to be published in Paleontological Research. They have not yet been copy edited and/or formatted in the publication style of Paleontological Research. As soon as they are printed, they will be removed from this website. Please note they can be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI, as follows: Humblet, M. and Iryu, Y. 2014: coral assemblages on Irabu-jima, South Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Paleontological Research, doi: 10.2517/2014PR020.

doi:10.2517/2017PR025

Fossil herpetocetine baleen whales (, Mysticeti, ) from the lower

Pliocene Horokaoshirarika Formation at Numata, Hokkaido, northern Japan

YOSHIHIRO TANAKA1, 2, 3, HITOSHI FURUSAWA4 AND LAWRENCE G. AcceptedBARNES5

1 Osaka Museum of Natural History, Nagai Park 1-23, Higashi-Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka,

546-0034, Japan (e-mail: [email protected])

2 Numata Museum, 2-7-49, Minami 1, Numata town, Hokkaido 078-2225

Japan

3Hokkaido University Museum, Kita 10, Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060- 0810 Japan manuscript 4Sapporo Museum Activity Center, 5-15-1-6, Hiragishi, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo,

Hokkaido 060-0001, Japan.

5Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los

Angeles, California 90007, U.S.A.

Abstract. Two mandibles of fossil mysticetes from the early , upper part

of the Horokaoshirarika Formation at Numata Town, Hokkaido, Japan, belong

to the archaic, extinct cetotheriid , Herpetocetinae, gen. et sp. indet.

by having an elongated angular process projecting posteriorly beyond the

mandibular condyle. The new materials of the Herpetocetinae represent the

northernmost occurrence in the North Pacific.

1 Key words: baleen whale, fossil, geographic range, Herpetocetinae, systematics

Introduction

The baleen whale family Cetotheriidae has varied in both its context and its content. AcceptedEarly accounts, for example, by Kellogg (1928) and Simpson (1945) included numerous within this family that are now considered to belong to other

mysticete clades. Today, Cetotheriidae are more strictly defined as the monophyletic

clade including rathkii Brandt, 1843, as first recovered in the

phylogenetic analysis of Bouetel and de Muizon (2006).

Steeman (2007) recognized the subfamily Herpetocetinae, which was subsequently

defined by Whitmore and Barnes (2008) to include Herpetocetus and Nannocetus based on their distinctive cranio-mandibularmanuscript articulation. Recently, Bisconti (2014) described a new mysticete, Herentalia nigra, referred to Herpetocetinae. However, H.

nigra has a much larger skull than the known herpetocetines, and it forms a clade with

Herpetocetus sp. (NMNS-PV 19540). The later analysis of Marx and Fordyce (2016)

put Herentalia in the Cetotheriidae, but not in the Herpetocetinae. Thus, here,

Herpetocetinae includes only Herpetocetus and Nannocetus.

There is an abundant record of herpetocetine material from Japan (Oishi and

Hasegawa, 1995), but little has been formally described. Inside Japan, herpetocetines

are known mostly from eastern Honshu. By contrast, records from northernmost

Japan, specifically, the island of Hokkaido are rare. A single tympanic bulla was

previously reported as having similarities with Herpetocetus sp. from Chiba and

Sendai, but only diagnosed to "Cetotheriidae, and species indeterminate”

(Shinohara and Tanaka, 2007). Here, we report two mandibles from exposures along

2 the Uryu and Horonitachibetsu Rivers at Numata Town (Figure 1), Hokkaido, which

are well known for their Pliocene marine , including mysticetes (e.g. Ichishima,

2005; Kimura et al., 1987; Tanaka, 2016a). The two mandibles are referable to

Herpetocetinae, and represent the northernmost record of the subfamily in the North

Pacific. Accepted Institutional abbreviations.—AMP = Ashoro Museum of Paleontology, Ashoro Town, Hokkaido, Japan; IRSNB = Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique,

Brussels, Belgium; MNHN = Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France;

NFL = Numata Fossil Museum, Numata Town, Hokkaido, Japan; NMNH-P =

Academian V. A. Topachevsky Paleontological Museum of the National Museum of

Natural History of the National Academy of Sciences of The Ukraine; NMNS =

National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan; SDNHM = San Diego Natural History Museum, San Diego, Califmanuscriptornia, USA; UCMP = University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, California, USA; VMW = Sierra

College Natural History Museum, Rocklin, California, USA.

Systematic paleontology

Class Mammalia Linnaeus, 1758

Order Cetacea Brisson, 1762

Unranked taxon Neoceti Fordyce and de Muizon, 2001

Suborder Mysticeti Gray, 1864

Family Cetotheriidae Brandt, 1872

Subfamily Herpetocetinae Steeman, 2007

Herpetocetinae, gen. et sp. indet.

3 Figures 2–5

Remarks.—The two mandibles reported herein, NFL 14 and 1025 belong to the

subfamily Herpetocetinae because of their far posteriorly projected angular process,

which exceeds that of all other cetotheriids in length (see Whitmore and Barnes, Accepted2008). This mandibular morphology is consistent with that of species that have previously been referred to Herpetocetus. However the specimens from Numata have

angular processes that differ from those of any other previously named species.

Geologic age and stratigraphy.—The two mandibles (NFL 14 and NFL 1025) were

collected from the upper part of the marine Horokaoshirarika Formation (Furusawa et

al., 1993) at Numata, Hokkaido, which is early Pliocene in age (Figure 1).

At the localities, a sedimentary sequence is exposed, comprising approximately 200 m of the upper part and 500 m of the lowermanuscript part of the Horokaoshirarika Formation (Watanabe and Yoshida, 1995). The boundary between the two is indicated by a thin

tuff layer (Kobayashi et al., 1969).

The marine Ichinosawa Formation and Bibaushi Formation both overlie the

Horokaoshirarika Formation, and are exposed along the lower parts of the

Horonitachibetsu River (Kobayashi et al., 1969), but not along the bed of the Uryu

River. The older, , marine Horoshin Formation underlies the

Horokaoshirarika Formation, and is exposed 2 km upstream from the locality of NFL

1025, and 3 km upstream from the locality of NFL 14.

The tuff separating the lower and upper parts of the Horokaoshirarika Formation has

been dated to approximately 4.5 Ma±0.7 Ma (Wada et al., 1986). The diatom

biostratigraphy suggests the age of the upper part of the Horokaoshirarika Formation

to be approximately 4.5 Ma to 3.9 or 3.5 Ma, and corresponds to the Thalassiosira

4 oestrupii Zone (Nakashima and Watanabe, 2000). Therefore, the age of the upper part

of the Horokaoshirarika Formation corresponds to approximately 4.5 Ma to 3.5 Ma,

or the early Pliocene.

In addition to the fossil mysticetes described here, the upper part of the

Horokaoshirarika Formation has also produced other marine vertebrates, including the Acceptedphocoenid Numataphocoena yamashitai Ichishima and Kimura, 2000 (same locality as NFL 1025; see also Tanaka, 2016b; Tanaka and Ichishima, 2016) and fossil

pinnipeds (Yamashita and Kimura, 1990; Kohno et al., 1995).

Referred specimen NFL 14.—An incomplete right mandible (Figures 2, 3, 6C, Table

1), collected by Toshitsugu Maeda on 17 August 1988, and prepared by Shigeru

Yamashita. The locality is in the bed of the Uryu River, in the 2nd Takaho District of

Numata Town (Figure 1). Only the posterior portion of NFL 14manuscript is preserved. The remaining part of the body is slightly curved laterally and dorsally, and contains five anteriorly-opening mental

foramina, which are 3–4 mm in diameter. Anteriorly, the cross section of the body

becomes both higher and thinner. At the point of fracture, the mandibular canal is

round in cross section and has a diameter of 8.5 mm.

The ramus consists of the broken base of what appears to have been a relatively low

coronoid process. The mandibular foramen is deeply excavated, with a robust lower

border and a rounded anterior rim; it measures 33.0 mm in height and 22.5 mm in

length. The articular surface of the mandibular condyle faces posterodorsally. The

posterior end of the angular process extends far posterior to the articular surface of the

mandibular condyle. Where the angular process is broken off, it is nearly rectangular

in cross section (26.0+ mm wide, 20.0 mm high).

5 Referred specimen NFL 1025.—A nearly complete right mandible (Figures 4, 5, 6D,

Table 2), found by Shigeru Yamashita on 15 June 1994, and collected by Shigeru

Yamashita, Takaoki Harada and Hitoshi Furusawa. The locality is in the bed of the

Horonitachibetsu River, in the 3rd Hokuryu District of Numata Town (Figure 1).

The posterior portion of the body of NFL 1025 is more clearly bowed laterally than AcceptedNFL 14. In lateral view, the body is somewhat arched dorsally and markedly expands in height anteriorly. There are at least three anteriorly opening mental foramina, each

of which is approximately 2.5 mm in diameter. The anterior end of the body is

somewhat triangular in cross section, with the ventral border being relatively thin. The

symphyseal groove is relatively shallow.

The mandibular foramen (Figures 4 and 5E, H) is deeply excavated, but otherwise

poorly preserved. The articular surface of the mandibular condyle is elongate and oriented posterodorsally. As in NFL 14,manuscript the subcondylar furrow is broad and poorly defined. The angular process is nearly complete, elongate, and extends for

approximately 58.0 mm posterior to the articular surface of the mandibular condyle.

Dorsally, the robust apex of the angular process is connected to the mandibular

condyle by a relatively narrow subcondylar furrow. Medially, the angular process is

flat in the likely area of insertion of the medial pterygoid muscle.

Overall, the two mandibles are similar in size, as indicated by mandibular condyle

widths of 30.0 mm (NFL 14) and 33.0 mm (NFL 1025), respectively. However, NFL

1025 differs in having a more elongate mandibular condyle, a more robust angular

process and a thicker dorsal connecting ridge between the two (15.0 mm vs 8.0 mm).

Such differences may reflect specific, ontogenetic, sexual, or individual variation, but

other, more complete, specimens are required to elucidate this.

6 Discussion

Comparisons with other herpetocetines

Of all described cetotheriids, the mandibles from Numata most closely resemble

herpetocetines. The only other possible contender, nana, differs from Acceptedthe present material in having a shorter angular process, a less depressed posterior portion of the mandibular condyle, and a wider body with a blunter ventral and a

sharper dorsal margin (e.g. MNHN SAS 1618; Bouetel and de Muizon, 2006).

The relatively large size of the mandibles from Numata suggests that they likely

represent Herpetocetus, rather than the comparatively small Nannocetus. However,

Nannocetus is currently only known from fragmentary juvenile cranium lacking the

mandible, which makes comparisons with this taxon difficult. Better preserved material of an ontogenetically more matumanuscriptre individual is needed to clarify the morphology and relationships of Nannocetus, as well as its putative status as a genus

separate from Herpetocetus.

Within Herpetocetus, the mandibles from Numata differ from H. scaldiensis

(IRSNB 14; see also Whitmore and Barnes, 2008; Figure. 1) in having a shorter but

also higher angular process. They resemble H. bramblei in having a dorsally arched

body, but also differ from this species in being more elongated, more slender, and in

having a somewhat more convex (dorsoventrally) medial border.

Finally, the specimens from Numata are both larger and more robust than the

holotype of H. morrowi (UCMP 129450), which furthermore might also be 2–3

million years younger (El Adli et al. 2014). A paratype of H. morrowi, SDNHM

35294, preserves only the anterior part, and its size and shape is very similar to NFL

1025. Another paratype, SDNHM 32138, shows a broken angular process, but the

7 preserved base is more slender than that of NFL 1025.

Overview of cetotheriid records from Hokkaido

There are three previous reports of “cetotheriid” fossils from Hokkaido (Egashira

and Kimura, 1998; Amano and Little, 2005; Shinohara and S. Tanaka, 2007); however,

not all of these may be members of the Cetotheriidae as presently defined. Accepted Egashira and Kimura (1998) reported “the first Cetotheriidae from Hokkaido”, AMP 35 (Taiki specimen 1 in the study) from a middle Miocene deposit. This

specimen, which was also briefly mentioned by Kimura and Ozawa (2002), includes

the posterior portion of the skull, the right mandible, the right tympanic bulla (not

illustrated in the publication), and the atlas. The mandible has a relatively short

angular process, that terminates anterior to the articular surface of the mandibular

condyle, unlike in cetotheriids. Regarding the taxonomic history of the family Cetotheriidae, the early accounts by Kellmanuscriptogg (1928) and Simpson (1945) included numerous species within the family, which are now considered to belong to other

mysticete clades. AMP 35 is one of the case, and is not demonstrably a member of the

family Cetotheriidae sensu stricto.

In our opinion, AMP 35 is similar to the late early Miocene holotype of Isanacetus

laticephalus Kimura and Ozawa, 2002, from Mie Prefecture, Japan. The two

specimens share transversely narrow and anteroposteriorly elongated nasal bones, as

well as a deeply concave orbital margin of the supraorbital process of the frontal.

Isanacetus has been interpreted as a stem mysticete (Deméré et al., 2005), a stem

balaenopterid (Kimura and Ozawa, 2002), or a member of the clade Balaenopteridae

+ Cetotheriidae (Bisconti, 2008; Bisconti et al., 2013; Gol'din et al., 2014; Marx,

2015).

The second putative record of cetotheriids from Hokkaido consists of a skull

8 fragment of a mysticete (NMNS-PV 20913) from the lower middle Miocene Chikubetsu Formation exposed near Shosanbetsu Village. It was reported in association with mollusk fossils and identified as belonging to the "cetothere group" based on a personal communication with N. Kohno at NMNS (Amano and Little, 2005). More recently, open-access database at NMNS (http://db.kahaku.go.jp/webmuseum_en/collect/search_rule.do;jsessionid=9177FE1F1 AcceptedA1F69604E8EFF8C4D2A8D7A?class_name=c ol_c2_02) has re-identified the specimen as a balaenomorph, instead of non-monophyletic “cetothere group.” The skull fragment does not show clear Cetotheriidae features; thus we follow the database identification.

The final report of a cetotheriid from Hokkaido is that of Shinohara and Tanaka

(2007), who identified a bulla, NFL 2162 as belonging to a cetotheriid. Regarding the

study, NFL 2162 is similar to Herpetocetus based on having an echelon, which was mentioned by Oishi and Hasegawa (1995)manuscript as a diagnosis of the Herpetocetus. Shinohara and Tanaka (2007) did not identify in genus level, because lack of

comparison with other cetotheriids. Here, we follow the authors’ identification, and

recognize that the specimen is the first cetotheriid sensu stricto record from Hokkaido,

but cannot identify as a Herpetocetus because the feature is also seen on a species of

the family Cetotheriidae, Piscobalaena sp. (see Fig. 33 of Bouetel and de Muizon,

2006), and probably be highly effected by ontogeny.

In the text of Shinohara and Tanaka (2007), the two mandibles (NFL 14 and 1025)

were mentioned possibilities as Herpetocetus sp. and Nannocetus sp. with personal

communication of H. Furusawa.

Paleobiogeographic patterns

Herpetocetinae appear to have been distributed throughout the temperate latitudes of

the Northern Hemisphere with records from both the eastern and western North

9 Pacific, and the eastern and western North Atlantic. Together, these occurrences range

in age from the late Miocene through the Pliocene, and at least one species may have

persisted into the Pleistocene (Boessenecker, 2013b) (Figure 7, Table 2).

Whitmore and Barnes (2008) reviewed the typology and geologic provenance of

Herpetocetus scaldiensis Van Beneden, 1872, and assigned to the species additional Acceptedspecimens, all of them from the same deposit in Belgium that yielded the lectotype and the other specimens that were originally described by Van Beneden (1872, 1882).

The first report of the genus Herpetocetus in the fossil record of the western North

Atlantic was the description of Herpetocetus transatlanticus Whitmore and Barnes,

2008 from the early Pliocene of North Carolina, U.S.A. In the eastern North Pacific

basin, Herpetocetus occurs in the latest Miocene to earliest Pliocene parts of the

Capistrano Formation in southern California and from the approximately contemporaneous Purisima Formationmanuscript in central California (Barnes 1977; Boessenecker 2013a; Whitmore and Barnes, 2008). The geochronologically youngest

named species is the late Pliocene Herpetocetus morrowi El Adli et al., 2014, from

the San Diego Formation at San Diego, California, U.S.A (El Adli et al., 2014).

Records of Herpetocetus and of Herpetocetus-like mysticetes are not uncommon in

Japan (Hatai et al., 1963; Oishi and Hasegawa, 1995; Shinohara and S. Tanaka, 2007;

the present study). The early Pliocene Herpetocetus bullae recorded from Choshi in

Chiba Prefecture by Oishi and Hasegawa (1995) are the southern-most records of

Herpetocetus in Japan. By contrast, the mandibles from Numata Town, Hokkaido, are

the northern-most records of Herpetocetinae in the North Pacific Ocean.

Conclusions

10

Two mandibles from the early Pliocene Horokaoshirarika Formation at Numata,

Hokkaido, Japan, represent the northernmost record of the fossil mysticete subfamily

Herpetocetinae in the North Pacific. These mandibles cannot currently be assigned to

this genus owing to the uncertainty surrounding the status of Nannocetus. The Acceptedmandibles in particular appear to differ from all described species of Herpetocetus, and may indicate a further increase in herpetocetine taxonomic diversity.

Acknowledgements

We thank Toshitsugu Maeda (Sapporo City, Fujino Jr. High School), Takaoki

Harada (Numata Jr. High School) for collecting and preparing the specimens. YT thanks Satoshi Shinohara (Numata Fossilmanuscript Museum) for guiding him to fossil localities in Numata Town; and Hiroshi Sawamura and Tatsuro Ando (Ashoro Museum of

Paleontology) for access to AMP 35. We also thank Felix G. Marx (Royal Belgian

Institute of Natural Sciences, Belgium, and Monash University, Australia), Cheng-

Hsiu Tsai (National Museum of Nature and Science, Japan) and Toshiyuki Kimura

(Gunma Museum of Natural History) for providing constructive reviews of the

manuscript. YT thanks R. Ewan Fordyce (University of Otago) for his comments to

this manuscript and encouragement on this project, Felix G. Marx for discussions on

cetotheriid systematics and morphology, Robert Boessenecker (College of

Charleston) for constructive comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript, Naoki

Kohno (National Museum of Nature and Science, Japan) for providing the

opportunity to examine specimens (NMNS-PV 19540), Nicholas D. Pyenson and

David J. Bohaska (United States National Museum of Natural History), Jun Nemoto

11 (Tohoku Univesity Museum), Masaya Oishi and Takafumi Mochiduki (Iwate

Prefecture Museum), and Tadasu Yamada and Yuko Tajima (National Museum of

Nature and Science, Japan) for providing access to comparative specimens. YT thanks

Olivier Lambert (Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique) for providing

references. HF and LGB benefitted from support from the Hokkaido University of AcceptedEducation and the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and its foundation for travel in Japan and the United States. We thank Masaichi Kimura (Hokkaido

University of Education, Numata Fossil Museum) for his encouragement to this

project.

References

Abel, O., 1938: Vorlaeufige mitteilungenmanuscript ueber die revision der fossilen mystacoceten aus dem Tertiaer Belgiens. Bulletin du Musée royal d'Histoire naturelle de

Belgique, vol. 14, p. 1–34.

Amano, K., and Little, C. T. S., 2005: Miocene whale-fall community from Hokkaido,

northern Japan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, vol. 215,

p. 345–356.

Barnes, L.G., 1977: Outline of eastern North Pacific fossil cetacean assemblages.

Systematic Zoology, vol. 25, p. 321–343 (for December, 1976).

Barnes, L.G., Howard, H., Hutchison, J., and Welton, B., 1981: The vertebrate fossils

of the marine Cenozoic San Mateo Formation at Oceanside, California, p. 53–70.

In Patrick, L.A., and Shannon, O.D. (eds.), Geologic investigations of the

coastal plain San Diego County, California, University of California.

Bisconti, M., 2008: Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of a new eschrichtiid

12 genus (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the Early Pliocene of northern Italy. Zoological

Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 153, p. 161–186.

Bisconti, M., 2014: Anatomy of a new cetotheriid genus and species from the

Miocene of Herentals, Belgium, and the phylogenetic and

palaeobiogeographical relationships of Cetotheriidae s.s. (Mammalia, Cetacea, AcceptedMysticeti). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, vol. 13, p. 377–395. Bisconti, M., Lambert, O., and Bosselaers, M., 2013: Taxonomic revision of Isocetus

depauwi (Mammalia, Cetacea, Mysticeti) and the phylogenetic relationships of

archaic ‘cetothere’ mysticetes. Palaeontology, vol. 56, p. 95–127.

Boessenecker, R. W., 2011: Herpetocetine (Cetacea: Mysticeti) mandibles from the

Upper Miocene Santa Margarita Sandstone of central California. Paleobios, vol.

30, p. 1–12. Boessenecker, R. W., 2013a: A new marinemanuscript vertebrate assemblage from the Late Purisima Formation in central California, part II: Pinnipeds and

Cetaceans. Geodiversitas, vol. 35, p. 815–940.

Boessenecker, R. W., 2013b: Pleistocene survival of an archaic dwarf baleen whale

(Mysticeti: Cetotheriidae). Naturwissenschaften, vol. 100, p. 365–371.

Boessenecker, R. W. and Fordyce, R. E., 2015: Anatomy, feeding ecology, and

ontogeny of a transitional baleen whale: a new genus and species of

Eomysticetidae (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the Oligocene of New Zealand.

PeerJ, vol. 3, e1129.

Bouetel, V. and Muizon, C. de, 2006: The anatomy and relationships of Piscobalaena

nana (Cetacea, Mysticeti), a Cetotheriidae s.s. from the early Pliocene of Peru.

Geodiversitas, vol. 28, p. 319–395.

Brandt, J., 1872: Uber eine neue Classification der Bartenwale (Balaenoidea) mit

13 Berucksichtigung der untergegangenen Gattungen derselben. Bulletin d

L'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St. Petersbourg, p.113–130.

Brisson, A., 1762: Regnum Animale in Classes IX distributum sive synopsis

methodica. Edito altero auctior. Theodorum Haak, Leiden, vol, 296.

Deméré, T. A., Berta, A. and McGowen, M. R., 2005: The taxonomic and Acceptedevolutionary history of fossil and modern balaenopteroid mysticetes. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, vol. 12, p. 99–143.

Deméré, T. A., McGowen, M. R., Berta, A. and Gatesy, J., 2008: Morphological and

molecular evidence for a stepwise evolutionary transition from teeth to baleen in

mysticete whales. Systematic Biology, vol. 57, p. 15–37.

Egashira, F. and Kimura, M., 1998: A new fossil Mysticeti from the Taiki town, Hiroo

County, Hokkaido. Nature and Science, vol.111, p. 7–22, (in Japanese with English abstract) manuscript Ekdale, E.G., Berta, A. and Deméré, T.A., 2011: The comparative osteology of the

petrotympanic complex (ear region) of extant baleen whales (Cetacea:

Mysticeti). PLoS ONE, vol.6: e21311.

El Adli, J. J., Deméré, T. A. and Boessenecker, R. W., 2014: Herpetocetus morrowi

(Cetacea: Mysticeti), a new species of diminutive baleen whale from the Upper

Pliocene () of California, USA, with observations on the evolution

and relationships of the Cetotheriidae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean

Society, vol. 170, p. 400–466.

Flot, L., 1896: Note sur les cétacés fossiles de l’Aquitaine. Bulletin du Societé

Geologique de France, vol. 3, p.270–282.

Fordyce, R. E. and Marx, F. G., 2013: The pygmy right whale Caperea marginata:

the last of the cetotheres. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological

14 Sciences, vol. 280, p. 1–6.

Fordyce, R. E. and Muizon, C. de, 2001: Evolutionary history of whales: a review. In,

Mazin, J. M., and de Buffrenil, V. eds., Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapods to

Life in Water, p. 169–234. Pfeil, München.

Furusawa, H., Maeda, T., Yamashita, S., Sagayama, T., Ishiguri, Y. and Kimura, M., Accepted1993: Geologic age and paleoenvironment of marine fossils from Numata-cho, Hokkaido. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), vol. 47, p. 133–145.

(in Japanese with English abstract)

Geisler, J. H. and Luo, Z., 1996: The petrosal and inner ear of Herpetocetus sp.

(Mammalia: Cetacea) and their implications for the phylogeny and hearing of

archaic mysticetes. Journal of Paleontology, vol. 70, p. 1045–1066.

Gol'din, P., Startsev, D. and Krakhmalnaya, T., 2014: The anatomy of Cetotherium riabinini Hofstein, 1948, a baleenmanuscript whale from the late Miocene of Ukraine. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, vol. 59, p. 795–814.

Gol'din, P. and Steeman, M. E., 2015: From problem taxa to problem solver: A new

Miocene family, Tranatocetidae, brings perspective on baleen whale evolution.

PLoS ONE, vol. 10, e0135500.

Gray, J. E., 1864: On the Cetacea which have been observed in the seas surrounding

the British Islands. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, vol. 1864,

p. 195-248.

Hatai, K., Hayasaka, S. and Masuda, K., 1963: Some fossil tympanics from the

Mizuho period of northern Japan. Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural History,

Research Bulletin, vol. 32, p. 17.

Ichishima, H., 2005: A re-evaluation of some Japanese cetacean fossils. Memoir of

the Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum, vol. 4, p.1–20. (in Japanese with

15 English abstract)

Ichishima, H. and Kimura, M., 2000: A new fossil porpoise (Cetacea: Delphinoidea:

Phocoenidae) from the Early Pliocene Horokaoshirarika Formation, Hokkaido,

Japan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, vol. 20, p. 561–576.

Kellogg, A. R., 1928: The history of whales - Their adaptation to life in the water Accepted(concluded). Quarterly Review of Biology, vol.3, p. 174–208. Kellogg, A. R., 1929: A new cetothere from southern California. University of

California Publications in Geological Sciences, vol. 18, p. 449–457.

Kimura, M., Yamashita, S., Ueda, J., Ganzawa, Y. and Takaku, K., 1987: Whales

from the lower Pliocene of Numata-cho, Uryu-gun, Hokkaido. Professor

Masaru Matui Memorial Volume, p. 27–57. (in Japanese with English abstract)

Kimura, T. and Hasegawa, Y., 2010: A new baleen whale (Mysticeti: Cetotheriidae) from the earliest late Miocene ofmanuscript Japan and a reconsideration of the phylogeny of cetotheres. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, vol. 30, p. 577–591.

Kimura, T. and Ozawa, T., 2002: A new cetothere (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the early

Miocene of Japan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, vol. 22, p. 684–702.

Kobayashi, I., Hata, M., Yamaguchi, S. and Kakimi, T., 1969: Geology of the

Moseushi district. Quadrangle series scale 1:50,000, 34 p. Geological Survey of

Japan. Kawasaki.

Kohno, N., Tomida, Y., Hasegawa, Y. and Furusawa, H., 1995: Pliocene tusked

odobenids (Mammalia: Carnivora) in the western North Pacific, and their

paleobiogeography. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Series C, vol. 21,

p. 111–130.

Linnaeus, C., 1758: Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classis,

ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, oocis.

16 Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm. p. 824.

Lydekker R., 1887: The Cetacea of the Suffolk Crag. Quarterly Journal of the

Geological Society, vol, 43, p. 7–18.

Marx, F. G., 2011: The more the merrier? A large cladistic analysis of mysticetes, and

comments on the transition from teeth to baleen. Journal of Mammalian AcceptedEvolution, vol. 18, p. 77–100. Marx, F. G. and Fordyce, R. E., 2015: Baleen boom and bust: a synthesis of mysticete

phylogeny, diversity and disparity. Royal Society Open Science, vol. 2, 140434

Marx, F.G., Bosselaers, M.E. and Louwye, S., 2016: A new species of Metopocetus

(Cetacea, Mysticeti, Cetotheriidae) from the Late Miocene of the .

PeerJ, vol. 4, e1572.

Marx, F.G., and Fordyce, R.E., 2016: A link no longer missing: New evidence for the cetotheriid affinities of Caperea.manuscript PLoS ONE, vol. 11, p.e0164059. Nakashima, R. and Watanabe, M., 2000: First occurrence age of Fortipecten

takahashii (Yokoyama) (Bivalvia: Pectinidae) from the lower part of the upper

Miocene Horokaoshirarika Formation in Numata-cho, central Hokkaido.

Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 106, p. 578–581. (in Japanese

with English abstract)

Oishi, M. and Hasegawa, Y., 1995: Diversity of Pliocene mysticetes from eastern

Japan. Island Arc, vol. 3, p. 436–452.

Oishi, M., Ono, K., Kawakami, T., Sato, J., Nokariya, H. and Hasegawa, Y., 1985:

Pliocene baleen whales and bony-toothed bird from Iwate Prefecture, Japan

(Parts 1–6). Bulletin of the Iwate Prefectural Museum, vol. 3, p.143–162.

Shinohara, S. and Tanaka, S., 2007: New occurrence of lower Pliocene Cetacea from

Numata, Hokkaido, Japan. Annual report of Numata Fossil Museum, vol.7, p.

17 16–22. (in Japanese with English abstract)

Simpson, G. G., 1945: The principles of classification and a classification of

. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 85, p. 1–

350.

Steeman, M. E., 2007: Cladistic analysis and a revised classification of fossil and AcceptedRecent mysticetes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 150, p. 875– 894.

Tanaka, Y., 2016a: A short note of a new whale caudal vertebra from the lower

Pliocene, upper Horokaoshirarika Formation, Uryu River in Numata, Hokkaido,

Japan. Annual report of Numata Fossil Museum, vol. 15, p. 21–22. (in Japanese

with English abstract)

Tanaka, Y., 2016b: A new and ontogenetically younger specimen of Numataphocoena yamashitai from the lower Pliocene,manuscript the upper part of the Horokaoshirarika Formation, Numata, Hokkaido, Japan. Paleontological Research, vol. 20, p.

105–115.

Tanaka, Y. and Ichishima, H., 2016: A new skull of the fossil porpoise

Numataphocoena yamashitai (Cetacea: Phocoenidae) from the upper part of the

Horokaoshirarika Formation (lower Pliocene), Numata Town, Hokkaido, Japan,

and its phylogenetic position. Palaeontologia Electronica, vol. 19, 48A.

Tanaka, Y., and Kohno, N., 2015: A new late Miocene odobenid (Mammalia: Carnivora) from Hokkaido, Japan suggests rapid diversification of basal Miocene odobenids. PLoS ONE: p.1–25. Tarasenko, K. and Lopatin, A., 2012: New baleen whale genera (Cetacea, Mammalia)

from the Miocene of the northern Caucasus and Ciscaucasia: 2. Vampalus gen.

nov. from the Middle-Late Miocene of Chechnya and Krasnodar Region.

Paleontological Journal, vol. 46, p. 620–629.

18 Tsai, C. H. and Fordyce, R. E., 2015: The earliest gulp-feeding mysticete (Cetacea:

Mysticeti) from the Oligocene of New Zealand. Journal of Mammalian

Evolution, vol. 22, p. 1–26.

Van Beneden, P. J., 1872: Les baleines fossiles d’Anvers. Bulletin de L'Academie

Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-arts, vol. 2, p. 6–20. AcceptedVan Beneden, P.J., 1882: Description des ossements fossiles des environs d'Anvers: Cétacés, genres Megaptera, Balaenoptera, Burtinopsis. Musée Royal d'Histoire

Naturelle de Belgique Bruxelles: Annales, vol. 7, p. 1–90.

Wada, N., Ganzawa, Y., Sagayama, T., Takahashi, K., Gocho, M., Watanabe, N. and

Akiyama, M., 1986. Stratigraphy and age determination of the Pliocene in the

Rumoi-Fukagawa district, Hokkaido, Japan, 93th annual meeting of the

Geological Society of Japan, p. 142. (in Japanese). Watanabe, M. and Yoshida, F., 1995: Geologymanuscript of the Ebishima district. Quadrangle series scale 1:50,000, 61 p. Geological Survey of Japan. Tsukuba.

Winge, H., 1910: Om Plesiocetus og Squalodon fra Danmark. Dansk Naturhistorisk

Forening, Copenhagen; Videnskabelige Meddelelser, vol. 7, p. 1–38.

Whitmore, F. and Barnes, L., 2008: The Herpetocetinae, a new subfamily of extinct

baleen whales (Mammalia, Cetacea, Cetotheriidae). Virginia Museum of Natural

History Special Publication, vol. 14, p. 141–180.

Yamashita, S. and Kimura, M., 1990: Occurrence of Early Pliocene otariid fossil in

Numata-cho, Hokkaido. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), vol. 44, p. 53–60. (in

Japanese with English abstract)

19 List of figures and tables

Figure 1. Maps showing the localities of herpetocetine cetotheriid mysticetes from

Numata Town, Hokkaido, Japan, reported in this study. A, locality of NFL 1025 on

the bed of the Horokaoshirarika River; B, locality of NFL 14 on the bed of the Uryu

River. C, stratigraphic column at the localities, which is modified from Tanaka and AcceptedIchishima (2016). The map of Japan and Numata Town are modified from Tanaka and Kohno (2015) and Tanaka and Ichishima (2016) respectively.

Figure 2. Herpetocetinae, gen. et sp. indet., incomplete right mandible, NFL 14. A,

dorsal view; B, medial view; C, ventral view; D, lateral view; E, posterior view; F,

anterior view. Dashed lines indicate missing parts based on published specimens of

Herpetocetus and NFL 1025, described herein. manuscript Figure 3. Herpetocetinae, gen. et sp. indet., incomplete right mandible with structures

labeled, NFL 14. A, dorsal view; B, medial view; C, ventral view with cross section;

D, lateral view; E, posterior view; F, anterior view showing cross section at transverse

break. Dashed lines indicate missing parts based on published specimens of

Herpetocetus and on NFL 1025, described herein.

Figure 4. Herpetocetinae, gen. et sp. indet., nearly complete right mandible, NFL

1025. A, dorsal view; B, medial view; C, lateral view; D–H, enlarged views of

separated posterior part; D, lateral view; E, posterior view; F, dorsal view; G, ventral

view; H, medial view.

Figure 5. Herpetocetinae, gen. et sp. indet., nearly complete right mandible with

20 structures labeled, NFL 1025. A, dorsal view; B, medial view; C, lateral view;.D–H,

enlarged views of separated posterior part; D, lateral view; E, posterior view; F, dorsal

view; G, ventral view; H, medial view. Dashed lines indicate missing parts based on

other published specimens of Herpetocetus and on NFL 14, described herein.

AcceptedFigure 6. Cetotheriidae, posterior parts of mandibles of various species in lateral view. A, Cetotherium riabinini (holotype, NMNH-P 668/1) redrawn from Gol’din et al.,

(2014); B, Piscobalaena nana (MNHN SAS 1618) redrawn from Bouetel and de

Muizon (2006); C, Herpetocetinae gen. et sp. indet. NFL 14; D, Herpetocetinae gen.

et sp. indet. NFL 1025; E, Herpetocetus morrowi (holotype, UCMP 129450) redrawn

from El Adli et al., (2014); F, Herpetocetus scaldiensis (lectotype, IRSNB 14)

redrawn and reversed from Van Beneden (1882); G, Herpetocetus bramblei (UCMP 219079) redrawn and reversed frommanuscript Boessenecker (2013a); H, Herpetocetus sp. (NMNS-PV 19540) redrawn and reversed from Bouetel and de Muizon (2006).

Figure 7. Paleogeographic distribution of the cetotheriid subfamily Herpetocetinae.

Table 1. Herpetocetinae, gen. et sp. indet., measurements in mm of mandibles, NFL

14 and NFL 1025, following the methods of Tsai and Fordyce (2015). Measurements

are rounded to the nearest 0.5 mm. Parameters are measured in either the transverse or

the dorso-ventral dimensions.

Table 2. List of reported Herpetocetinae.

21

Mandibles NFL 14 NFL 1025 Length of mandible, as preserved 490.0+ 1250.0+ in straight line

Height of mandible, from coronoid process to ventral 54.5+ 80.0 margin Maximum preserved height of 54.5 69.0 mandible Maximum preserved width of 41.0 41.0 mandible Height of body at just anterior to coronoid process 42.0 - Width of body at just anterior to 32.0 coronoid process - Identification Age Formations Localities Materials Reference early to middle California, Skull and periotic Herpetocetus sp. Falor Fm. Boessenecker (2013b) Pleistocene USA (VMW-65) Skull, periotics, bullae, mandible, Herpetocetus morrowi San Diego California, vertebrae, ribs and late Pliocene El Adli et al. (2014) (Type) Fm. USA humerus (UCMP 129450) and 42 pratypes Herpetocetinae gen. et Horokaoshirari Hokkaido, Mandibles (NFL 14, Shinohara and Tanaka early Pliocene sp. indet. ka Fm. Japan 1025) (2007) and This study Tatsunokuchi Miyagi, Skeleton (NSMT-PV Herpetocetus sp. early Pliocene Oishi et al. (1985) Fm. Japan 19540) Tatsunokuchi Miyagi, Oishi and Hasegawa Herpetocetus sp. early Pliocene 7 bullae Fm. Japan (1995) Iwate, Oishi and Hasegawa Herpetocetus sp. early Pliocene Yushima Fm. 3 bullae Japan (1995)

Iwate, Oishi and Hasegawa aff. Herpetocetus sp. early Pliocene Yushima Fm. 1 bulla Japan (1995)

cf. Herpetocetus sp. Chiba, Oishi and Hasegawa (Group I in the early Pliocene Na-arai Fm. 5 bullae Japan (1995) publication) Left half skull, left Herpetocetus bramblei California, periotic and right Whitmore and Barnes early Pliocene Purisima Fm. (Type) USA mandible (UCMP (2008) 82465) California, Mandible Herpetocetus bramblei early Pliocene Purisima Fm. Boessenecker (2013a) USA (UCMP219079) Squamosal, periotics California, and bullae (7 UCMP Herpetocetus sp. early Pliocene Purisima Fm. Boessenecker (2013a) USA specimens were referred) Partial skull, left North Herpetocetus periotic and bulla Whitmore and Barnes early Pliocene Yorktown Fm. Carolina, transatlanticus (Type) (USNM 182962) and (2008) USA 11 paratypes North Periotic (USNM Herpetocetus sp. early Pliocene Yorktown Fm. Carolina, Geisler and Luo (1996) 299652) USA Skull, bullae and Marryland, Nannocetus eremus late Miocene Calvert Fm. periotics (UCMP Kellogg (1929) USA 26502) Santa Herpetocetinae, gen. et California, Mandible (UCMP late Miocene Margarita Boessenecker (2011) sp. indeterminate USA 85431) Sandstone Herpetocetus scaldiensis Antwerp, Van Beneden (1872), ?? Mandible (IRSNB 14) (Type) Belgium Abel (1938) Left squamosal (IRSNB 405), partial Herpetocetus scaldiensis Antwerp, skull and right Whitmore and Barnes ?? (Referred) Belgium periotic, bulla and (2008) stapes (USNM 336361)

Bulla (at Museum of Herpetocetus scaldiensis Practical Geology) (Referred, but not and unknown illustrated and described) element (No. 2816 at England, the Museum of the Pleistocene Red Crag UK College of Surgeons) Lydekker (1887) Baja Rosarito California, aff. Herpetocetus sp. middle Miocene Beach Fm. Mexco ? Barnes (1998)