Draft Mental Incapacity Bill Draft Mental Incapacity Bill

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Mental Incapacity Bill Draft Mental Incapacity Bill House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Incapacity Bill Draft Mental Incapacity Bill Session 2002–03 Volume I HL Paper 189-I HC 1083-I House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Incapacity Bill Draft Mental Incapacity Bill Session 2002-03 Volume I Report together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 17 November 2003 HL Paper 189-I HC 1083-I Published on 28 November 2003 by authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Incapacity Bill The Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Incapacity Bill was appointed by the House of Commons and the House of Lords on Friday 11 July 2003 to examine the Draft Mental Incapacity Bill and report to both Houses no later than four months after the presentation of the draft Bill Current membership Lord Carter (Labour) Chairman Baroness Barker (Liberal Democrat) Baroness Fookes (Conservative) Baroness Knight of Collingtree (Conservative) Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall (Labour) Lord Pearson of Rannoch (Conservative) Lord Rix (Crossbencher) Baroness Wilkins (Labour) Mr John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Mrs Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Mr Paul Burstow MP (Liberal Democrat, Sutton and Cheam) Jim Dowd MP (Labour, Lewisham West) Stephen Hesford MP (Labour, Wirral West) Mrs Joan Humble MP (Labour, Blackpool North and Fleetwood) Huw Irranca-Davies MP (Labour, Ogmore) Laura Moffatt MP (Labour, Crawley) Powers The committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet away from Westminster, to meet at any time, (except when Parliament is prorogues or dissolved), to appoint specialist advisers, and to make reports to the two Houses. Publication The Report and evidence of the Joint Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the two Houses. All publications of the Joint Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/jcmib.cfm Committee staff The staff of the Committee were drawn from both Houses and comprised Gordon Baker and Sîan Jones (Clerks), Francene Graham (Committee Assistant), and Melanie Moore (Committee Secretary). The Committee was supported by the Scrutiny Unit in the House of Commons Committee Office. Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Joint Committee on the Mental Incapacity Bill, House of Lords, London SW1P 0PW. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 8387; the Joint Committee’s email address is [email protected] 1 Contents Report Page Summary 5 1 Chapter 1 Background to the Draft Bill: 9 Consultation 9 2 Chapter 2: Conduct of the Inquiry 11 3 Chapter 3: Is the Bill necessary? 13 4 Chapter 4: Principles of the Bill 15 5 Chapter 5: Human Rights Considerations 18 Human Rights Act Compatibility 18 Article 2(1) provides: 19 Article 6(1) provides: 20 6 Chapter 6: (Clauses 1-3) Decision-making capacity 22 Clause 1: Decision-making capacity 22 7 Chapter 7: (Clause 4) Best interests 25 The concept of “best interests” 25 The definition and scope of best interests 26 Best ‘personal’ interests 27 Primacy of interests 28 Values 29 Human rights 29 Consultation with others 29 Standard of conduct / Duty of care 31 Reasonable belief 31 8 Chapter 8: (Clauses 6-7) The General Authority 32 The rationale behind creating a ‘general authority’ 33 Concerns arising from drafting and terminology 35 Best interests 37 Reasonable belief 37 The scope of the general authority 38 The adequacy of safeguards 39 Further exclusions 41 Dispute resolution mechanisms 41 Use of force 42 9 Chapter 9: (Clauses 8-13) Lasting Powers of Attorney 43 10 Chapter 10: (Clauses 14-22) The Court of Protection and Court Appointed Deputies 49 11 Chapter 11: (Clauses 22-26) Advance Decisions to Refuse Treatment 55 Recommendations 58 12 Chapter 12: (Clause 27) Linkage with the Mental Health Act/Bill 60 Clause 27: Interface with mental health legislation 60 Mental Health Act 1983 61 The ‘Bournewood gap’ 63 13 Chapter 13: (Clause 30) Codes of Practice 64 Status of the Codes of Practice 64 Preparation and revision of the Codes of Practice 65 Content of the Codes of Practice 66 Best interests 68 Decision-makers acting under formal powers 69 Monitoring implementation of the Codes of Practice 70 14 Chapter 14: Protection against abuse and exploitation 71 Arrangements for dealing with abuse 71 The need for additional powers? 72 Switching the burden of proof 74 Criminal law provisions 74 15 Chapter 15: Medical Research 75 16 Chapter 16: Advocacy 79 The need for advocacy services 79 A right to advocacy? 80 The role and status of advocates 82 Standards and quality of advocacy services 82 17 Chapter 17: Resources 83 What will the Bill cost? 83 Cost of Possible Additions to the Bill 87 Will the resources be available to implement the Bill? 87 What will the benefits of the Bill be? 88 Conclusions 89 18 Chapter 18: Access to Information 90 ACCESS TO INFORMATION 90 19 Chapter 19: Jurisdiction 92 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES 92 20 Chapter 20: Change of Title 94 Conclusions and recommendations 94 Annex: Press Notice issued on 17 July 2003 109 3 Formal minutes 112 Witnesses 123 List of written evidence 124 List of unprinted written evidence 128 5 Summary The draft Mental Incapacity Bill is the product of extensive consultation stretching back to 1989. We have been expected to scrutinise and report on it in little more than two months working time: an over-optimistic timescale which calls into question the process for setting deadlines for pre-legislative scrutiny. However we have considered over 1200 written submissions, heard evidence from 61 witnesses and have produced as thorough an analysis as possible in the time available. On the whole, we endorse the principles and general direction of the draft Bill. The majority of evidence we received was broadly supportive of the Bill. We believe that there is a clear need for the bill and our report, whilst critical, should be read accordingly. The difficulty of trying to create satisfactory legislation in this complex and sensitive area should not be underestimated. The draft Bill has provoked strong feelings, both positive and negative. We sympathise with some of the anxieties expressed, though we believe that many of them are misplaced. Nevertheless, considering the long gestation period it has had, the draft Bill still has shortcomings. We believe those shortcomings can and should be rectified. Although a great deal of work remains to be done to get the Bill right, and strong feelings about it will undoubtedly remain, we hope it will soon be brought before Parliament. Those it is intended to help have waited long enough for the benefits it should bring them. We endorse the draft Bill’s widely-supported aim of replacing common law uncertainties by a comprehensive statutory framework to define mental capacity, help those lacking it to make their own decisions where they can and enable sound decisions to be made for them when they can not. We believe that the Bill should follow the model of the comparable Scottish law by setting out the guiding principles at the start. While this may not be necessary for lawyers, it will undoubtedly be helpful for the many lay people likely to be affected by it and will set clear guidelines around which good practice can be developed. The draft Bill rests on a combination of the well-established common law principle of best interests and the presumption of capacity. We think this approach is sound. The Bill should be seen as enabling rather than restrictive, although it has to strike a delicate balance between respect for individual autonomy and the need to protect the vulnerable. We acknowledge the difficulties inherent in trying to create a satisfactory legislative framework for mental capacity of varying degrees, from temporary to permanent and including fluctuating capacity, and for decisions ranging from the everyday to the life changing. The draft Bill’s yardstick of functional capacity – assessing capacity in relation to the required decision at the time when it is needed – seems right. The concept of best interests is the draft Bill’s other cornerstone. This is well-enough understood by lawyers, but perhaps open to misinterpretation by others. Decision-makers must be clear about what is expected. The draft Bill introduces the new concept of General Authority. This is intended to replace the common law defence of necessity with positive permission-giving arrangements for 6 taking everyday and emergency decisions. The concept has been widely misunderstood and the term “authority” itself seems to have negative connotations for some who fear it amounts to licensed paternalism. Consideration should be given to a more appropriate term. Proposals in the draft Bill would extend the present Enduring Powers of Attorney to a new Lasting Power of Attorney, which will include decisions on welfare and healthcare as well as financial management. We received disturbing evidence indicating serious abuse of financial powers under the present Enduring Powers of Attorney which the Bill must strive to curb. Stricter safeguards will be needed and those who act under these powers will need clear guidance on what is involved and be required to keep adequate records of financial transactions. We welcome the draft Bill’s proposal to introduce a new Court of Protection: a more accessible single jurisdiction with powers and authority akin to those of the High Court. But we are concerned over the apparent limitations on availability of legal aid. Deputies appointed by the Court to take decisions on behalf of those lacking capacity will need clear standards of conduct and limitations on their autonomy.
Recommended publications
  • The Privatisation of Qinetiq
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts The privatisation of QinetiQ Twenty–fourth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 12 May 2008 HC 151 Published on 10 June 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Mr Paul Burstow MP (Liberal Democrat, Sutton and Cheam) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow South West) Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Angela Eagle MP (Labour, Wallasey) Nigel Griffiths MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Rt Hon Keith Hill MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Dr John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Geraldine Smith MP (Labour, Morecombe and Lunesdale) Rt Hon Don Touhig MP (Labour, Islwyn) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) The following were also Members of the Committee during the period of the enquiry: Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and Poole North) and Mr John Healey MP (Labour, Wentworth). Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of 2008122008-Cwells-Regulated
    1 donation information continues on reverse Late reported donation by regulated donees 15 February 2001 - 31 January 2008 (where data is available) Regulated donee Donor organisation Donor forename Donor surname Donor status Address 1 Address 2 Jimmy Hood MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Keith Simpson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Cheryl Gillan MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Elfyn Llwyd MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John Gummer MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Christopher Beazles BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Chris Smith MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mike Weir MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tony Worthington MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Davidson MP BAA plc Company 130 Wilton Road Paul Tyler BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Matthew Taylor MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Menzies Campbell MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Archy Kirkwood BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Hanson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Colin Breed MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Marshall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mark Oaten MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Diana Wallis MEP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall Christopher Ruane MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tim Loughton MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John McFall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road
    [Show full text]
  • Pension, Disability and Carers Service
    House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee Pension, Disability and Carers Service Oral and written evidence Wednesday 17 December 2008 Mr Terry Moran, Ms Vivien Hopkins and Mr Nigel Richardson Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 17 December 2008 HC 104-i Published on 9 February 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Work and Pensions Committee The Work and Pensions Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Work and Pensions and its associated public bodies. Current membership Terry Rooney MP (Labour, Bradford North) (Chairman) Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) Harry Cohen MP (Labour, Leyton and Wanstead) Michael Jabez Foster MP (Labour, Hastings and Rye) Oliver Heald MP (Conservative, North East Hertfordshire) John Howell MP (Conservative, Henley) Joan Humble MP (Labour, Blackpool North and Fleetwood) Tom Levitt MP (Labour, High Peak) Greg Mulholland MP (Liberal Democrat, Leeds North West) John Penrose MP (Conservative, Weston-Super-Mare) Jenny Willott MP (Liberal Democrat, Cardiff Central) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/workpencom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are James Rhys (Clerk), Emma Graham (Second Clerk), Amy Sweeney and Hanna Haas (Committee Specialists), Laura Humble (Committee Media Advisor), John-Paul Flaherty (Committee Assistant), Hannah van Schijndel (Committee Secretary) and John Kittle (Senior Office Clerk).
    [Show full text]
  • Pension Credit
    House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee Pension Credit Third Report of Session 2004-05 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 23 February 2005 HC 43-II [Incorporating HC 1219 i and HC 1219 ii , Session 2003-04] Published on 9 March 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £21.50 The Work and Pensions Committee The Work and Pensions Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Work and Pensions and its associated public bodies. Current membership Sir Archy Kirkwood MP (Liberal Democrat, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Chairman) Ms Vera Baird MP (Labour, Redcar) Miss Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Regent’s Park and Kensington North) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Mr Paul Goodman MP (Conservative, Wycombe) Mr David Hamilton MP (Labour, Midlothian) Mrs Joan Humble MP (Labour, Blackpool North and Fleetwood) Rob Marris MP (Labour, Wolverhampton South West) Andrew Selous MP (Conservative, South West Bedfordshire) Mr Nigel Waterson MP (Conservative, Eastbourne) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/work_and_pensions_comm ittee.cfm.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Start in Life? Alleviating Deprivation, Improving Social Mobility, and Eradicating Child Poverty
    House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee The best start in life? Alleviating deprivation, improving social mobility, and eradicating child poverty Second Report of Session 2007–08 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20 February 2008 HC 42-II Published on 10 March 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Work and Pensions Committee The Work and Pensions Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Work and Pensions and its associated public bodies. Current membership Terry Rooney MP (Labour, Bradford North) (Chairman) Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) Harry Cohen MP (Labour, Leyton and Wanstead) Michael Jabez Foster MP (Labour, Hastings and Rye) Oliver Heald MP (Conservative, Hertfordshire North East) Joan Humble MP (Labour, Blackpool North and Fleetwood) Tom Levitt MP (Labour, High Peak) Greg Mulholland MP (Liberal Democrat, Leeds North West) John Penrose MP (Conservative, Weston-Super-Mare) Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) Jenny Willott MP (Liberal Democrat, Cardiff Central) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Natascha Engel MP (Labour, North East Derbyshire) Justine Greening MP (Conservative, Putney) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Committee on Business Appointments
    Advisory Committee on Business Appointments Nineteenth Annual Report 2017-2018 1 17 July 2018 Dear Prime Minister, This letter accompanies the nineteenth report of the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, which covers the year to 31 March 2018. In 2017-2018, the Committee considered 230 applications for advice. That included 93 applications from Ministers (compared to 104 applications in 2016-2017); and 137 applications from former senior Crown servants (compared to 140 in 2016-2017). Two long-standing independent committee members completed their terms of office this year and three new independent members were appointed, joining in February 2018. New staff were also recruited to the Committee’s small secretariat team, meaning this was a busy year inducting and training new members and staff, while continuing to advise on individual cases. Many of the applications advised on this year have been complex and required a significant amount of time and resource to fully consider. For example, in the majority of cases considered this year, there was a link between the applicants’ responsibilities in office and the proposed appointment/ employment. This increases the potential for risks to arise under the Government's Business Appointment Rules (the Rules) and means that more information is needed to consider the application appropriately. In the reporting year 2017-18, 67% of applications were dealt with within our target deadlines. Members and the secretariat have worked hard to maintain a steady performance given the complexity of cases and the increase in casework. The results can be seen in the detailed considerations in the advice letters provided and published.
    [Show full text]
  • Members 1979-2010
    Members 1979-2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/33 28 April 2010 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979 to the dissolution of Parliament on 12 April 2010. The Paper also provides basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. This Paper replaces an earlier version, Research Paper 09/31. Oonagh Gay Richard Cracknell Jeremy Hardacre Jean Fessey Recent Research Papers 10/22 Crime and Security Bill: Committee Stage Report 03.03.10 10/23 Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill [HL] [Bill 79 of 2009-10] 08.03.10 10/24 Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill: Committee Stage Report 08.03.10 10/25 Northern Ireland Assembly Members Bill [HL] [Bill 75 of 2009-10] 09.03.10 10/26 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report 11.03.10 10/27 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2010 17.03.10 10/28 Transport Policy in 2010: a rough guide 19.03.10 10/29 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2010/11 26.03.10 10/30 Digital Economy Bill [HL] [Bill 89 of 2009-10] 29.03.10 10/31 Economic Indicators, April 2010 06.04.10 10/32 Claimant Count Unemployment in the new (2010) Parliamentary 12.04.10 Constituencies Research Paper 10/33 Contributing Authors: Oonagh Gay, Parliament and Constitution Centre Richard Cracknell, Social and General Statistics Section Jeremy Hardacre, Statistics Resources Unit Jean Fessey, House of Commons Information Office This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • MS 254 A980 Women's Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1
    1 MS 254 A980 Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1 Administrative papers Parliamentary Correspondence Correspondence with Members of Parliament 1/1/1 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1978-95 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Diane Abbot, Robert Adley, Jonathan Aitken, Richard Alexander, Michael Alison, Graham Allen, David Alton, David Amess, Donald Anderson, Hilary Armstrong, Jacques Arnold, Tom Arnold, David Ashby, Paddy Ashdown, Joe Ashton, Jack Aspinwall, Robert Atkins, and David Atkinson 1/1/2 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Kenneth Baker, Nicholas Baker, Tony Baldry, Robert Banks, Tony Banks, Kevin Barron, Spencer Batiste and J. D. Battle 1/1/3 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Margaret Beckett, Roy Beggs, Alan James Beith, Stuart Bell, Henry Bellingham, Vivian Bendall, Tony Benn, Andrew F. Bennett, Gerald Bermingham, John Biffen, John Blackburn, Anthony Blair, David Blunkett, Paul Boateng, Richard Body, Hartley Booth, Nichol Bonsor, Betty Boothroyd, Tim Boswell and Peter Bottomley 1/1/4 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1975-94 efforts of the Women’s Campaign
    [Show full text]
  • Formative Evaluation of V, the National Young Volunteers’ Service Interim Report
    Formative evaluation of v, The National Young Volunteers’ Service Interim Report Authors : National Centre for Social Research, Institute for Volunteering Research, University of Southampton, University of Birmingham, Public Zone Date : May 2010 Foreword Since our launch in 2006, I have maintained a passionate commitment to the robust and independent evaluation of v’s work. I strongly believe that external analysis of our performance is vital in enabling us to deliver an honest and transparent account of v’s role in investing public and private sector funds in young people and communities across England. The decision to commission a formative evaluation of our work is deliberate and responds directly to our ambitions to be a reflective and responsive learning organisation. The National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) has provided the intellectual and academic rigour required to independently evaluate v’s work, bringing together nine separate qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and engaging a wide range of key stakeholders to fully assess the impact of v’s activities on the youth volunteering landscape in England. The results presented in this interim formative report provide compelling evidence of v’s outstanding achievements in delivering a coherent and inclusive national young volunteers’ service. The evaluation confirms that through our national network of delivery partners, v has exceeded the youth volunteering opportunities target originally set out in the Russell Commission report. Perhaps more importantly, the report provides strong evidence that v’s programmes have engaged a diverse cohort of young people to participate in community service opportunities, including socially excluded groups. v has also played a key role in building the capacity of the public and charity sectors to engage young people effectively in their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Patient Care by Reducing the Risk of Hospital Acquired Infection: a Progress Report
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Improving patient care by reducing the risk of hospital acquired infection: a progress report Twenty–fourth Report of Session 2004–05 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 6 April 2005 HC 554 Incorporating HC 1044-i, Session 2003–04 Published on 23 June 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £13.50 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Allan MP (Liberal Democrat, Sheffield Hallam) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Mrs Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Jon Cruddas MP (Labour, Dagenham) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow Pollock) Rt Hon Frank Field MP (Labour, Birkenhead) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Nigel Jones MP (Liberal Democrat, Cheltenham) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, West Renfrewshire) Mr Siôn Simon MP (Labour, Birmingham Erdington) Mr Gerry Steinberg MP (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Stephen Timms MP (Labour, East Ham) Jon Trickett MP (Labour, Hemsworth) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) The following was also a member of the Committee during the period of this inquiry. Ms Ruth Kelly MP (Labour, Bolton West) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Committee on Business Appointments Eighteenth Annual Report 2016-2017
    Advisory Committee on Business Appointments Eighteenth Annual Report 2016-2017 1 20 July 2017 Dear Prime Minister, This letter accompanies the eighteenth report of the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, which covers the year to 31 March 2017. The Committee continued to see a high volume of applications in 2016-17, with the numbers similar to those dealt with in the preceding year. This was in part due to the change of Prime Minister in July 2016 and following Ministerial reshuffle, combined with the on-going effect of the May 2015 General Election. The Committee gave advice on 104 applications from former Ministers in 2016-17, compared to 123 applications in 2015-16 (substantially higher than the 49 dealt with in 2014-15). There were 140 applications from former Crown servants, compared with 110 in 2015-16 (89 in 2014-15). It was a challenging year for the Secretariat; with new personnel settling in after a period of change and an increase in casework. This included many cases which required significant work by the Secretariat; in particular, seeking further information from applicants about the nature of proposed roles; and former Government departments about individuals’ responsibilities held whilst in office. This year 70% of applications were dealt with within our target deadlines, compared to 75% in 2015-16. Those Ministers who left Government at the May 2015 General Election are no longer subject to the Business Appointment Rules, which apply for two years from last day of service. However, the Committee will continue to see applications from those leaving Ministerial posts, including those who left Government in July 2016 and following the recent General Election.
    [Show full text]