February 10, 2021 Thai Enquirer Summary Political News • Yet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

February 10, 2021 Thai Enquirer Summary Political News • Yet February 10, 2021 Thai Enquirer Summary Political News Yet another perfect storm seems to be building in Thailand right when the overall student lead movement was reportedly losing steam. To fuel fire to the gradually slowing student movement, the judiciary has denied bail to 4 of the protest leaders who were sent to Bangkok Remand Prison yesterday evening. This prompted a flash mob in-front of MBK shopping complex where yet another protest with pots and pans are planned today. The other fuel to fire is yet another delay tactic used by Phalang Pracharat Party’s Paiboon Nititawan who proposed that the ‘Constitutional Court’ decide if the amendment of the constitution is ‘constitutional or not. Read the details of these 2 issues below. The 1st move is to imprison the anti-government protests led by the Ratsadon (People’s Movement) Group is expected to escalate from today. The escalation came after public prosecutors announced decision to indict 4 of its key leaders on 11 charges including lèse majesté under Section 112 and colluding in sedition under Section 116 of the Criminal Code for their roles in the rallies on September 19 and 20 at Thammasat University and Sanam Luang. The 4 key leaders – Parit “Penguin” Chiwarak Anont Nampa Patiwat Saraiyam aka “Mor Bank” Somyos Prueksakasemsook The detention of the 4 activists will likely cause the political temperature in Thailand to rise again, as Panusaya “Rung” Sithijirawattanakul, core protest leader of the Ratsadon Group, vowed to mobilised supporters to the street. As part of the planned protest, a small protest was held on skywalk in front of MBK Center. Another rally has been called for at 17:00 hrs to 21:05 hrs to pressure the court to release the 4 Ratsadon activists who are believed to be detained at the Bangkok Remand Prison. Panusaya said the government underestimated the Ratsadon mob. She said by putting the 4 core activists in prison would not stop the group from mobilising its supporters. She called on all supporters to come out to show their force today. The 2nd issue was in the parliament where the House of Representatives and the Senate voted 366-316, with 15 abstentions, to seek a Constitutional Court ruling on the legality of the ongoing charter amendment process at the joint sitting. A similar delay tactic initiated by the same party and person - Phalang Pracharat Party’s Paiboon Nititawan, in late November 2020 had seen clashes between the student movement and the authorities. The 366 yes-votes were from 230 senators and 113 MPs from Phalang Pracharat; 1 from Democrat; 5 from Palang Thongtin Thai, 5 from Ruam Phalang Prachachart Thai; 2 from Rak Puen Pa, 1 from New Economics and 9 from other small coalition parties. The 316 no-votes were 124 Pheu Thai MPs; 51 Move Forward MPs; 9 Seri Ruam Thai MPs; 5 Prachachart MPs; 5 Puea Chart MPs; 1 New Economics MPs; 1 Palang Puangchon Thai MPs and other coalition parties, namely 60 from Bhumjai Thai; 47 from Democrat; 12 from ChartThai Pattana and 1 Thai Civilized. During the joint sitting Democrat veteran and list-MP Banyat Bantadtan is one of Democrat MPs who opposed Paiboon Nititawan’s push to seek a Constitutional Court interpretation as he pointed out that the move will be just a “waste”. The charter amendment process has already been set in motion once the House accepted charter amendment bills which will soon be tabled the House for the 2nd and 3rd readings, Banyat said as he put it: . “People have hopes for the charter rewriting process. It is a pity for people in the entire country who may have felt that a new constitution can take shape only when the country has a coup and ordinary people have no part in it,” Banyat said, describing the move as “inauspicious” for Thailand. Pita Limjaroenrat, the Move Forward Party leader, accused the government of dragging its feet on the charter amendment process from time to time. He doesn’t think that the amendment process will happen in a near future, saying that it is a shame that the amendment process is hindered by uncertainty brought upon by the parliament itself. House Speaker Chuan Leekpai downplayed concerns that the House of Representatives’ move to petition the Constitutional Court would affect the schedule for the censure debate, which is expected to take place from February 16-19. Chief opposition whip and Pheu Thai MP Sutin Klungsang denounced the PPRP’s move, seeing the motion as an attempt to stall the anticipated censure debate. Meanwhile, Warong Dechgitvigrom, leader of the royalist “Thai Pakdee” (Loyal Thai) Group, will travel to meet the parliament speaker and the Senate speaker today at 10:30 hrs at parliament to submit 101,568 signatures of people who oppose a bill to amend Section 112 of the Criminal Code on lese majeste. There was a hoo-hah among reporters yesterday when Prime Minister Gen Prayut Chan- o-cha mentioned of a rich man in the telecommunications business in 1987. His mention sent the media to link his reference to self-exile former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra. During his visit to the “bio-circular green (BCG) economy” Fair yesterday, Gen Prayut praised many good things that happened in Thailand. He pointed that Thailand had changed from an agricultural society to an export-and technology- oriented society. If this is not the case, the country would not see many rich people including one in 1987 from telecom projects. Interestingly, reporters noticed Gen Prayut changed his hairstyle by parting his hair on the left side, instead of the right side. His new hairstyle sent reporters to ask if he wants to look young like Thaksin who appeared to be physically fit after his youngest daughter Paethongtan Shinawatra posted on her Instagram a photo of Thaksin doing Thai kick-boxing training at his residence in Dubai, the UAE. Gen Prayut then told reporters not to mention “this particular name” because he is not in the country. Gen Prayut plans to communicate with the people via video-sharing app TikTok starting from February 12 which falls on the Chinese New Year. The Prime Minister also plans to boost his communications with the public on his podcast, according to Government spokesman Anucha Burapachaisri. The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC)’s meeting unanimously voted to accuse Pareena Kraikupt, a Phalang Pracharat MP for Ratchaburi province, of having committed a serious violation of a political post holder’s code of ethics in response to forest encroachment charges against the PPRP MP filed by the National Resources and Environmental Crime Suppression Division. The NACC will today hold a press conference today at 14.00 hrs at Sanam Bin Nam head office to explain its decision. Economic News Dr Boon Vanasin, Chairman of Thonburi Healthcare Group Plc (THG), came out to slam the government’s attempt to bar the private sector and other organisations to purchase Covid-19 vaccines directly from vaccine producers. Dr Boon’s comment came after Deputy Prime Minister and Public Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul came out to say local administration organisations (LAOs) or the private sector cannot buy vaccines themselves after the government sent a letter to the Department of Provincial Administration on February 8 to confirm that the government will be the only party to procure and administer the country’s vaccination program for target groups. The THG chairman criticised the government’s vaccine program which has yet to start until April and the deal to provide 26 million doses of the vaccine to the country is insufficient. Dr Boon said the government’s action is unjustified as its vaccine program is unlikely to cover the entire population. He said it will take the government around 2 years to inoculate 60 per cent of the population. The efficiency of the government’s vaccine program to control the outbreak is only at 60-70 per cent of the population, accounting for around 45 million people. The THG chairman said it is not the private sector’s business to criticise the government for banning LAOs from buy Covid-19 vaccines. However, the government’s move to ban private hospitals from acquiring vaccines is not right. He will discuss with the Private Hospital Association to find a solution on the issue. Bangkok Insurance Plc (BKI) launched new insurance plan for people who have allergic reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines ahead of the government’s vaccine distribution plan expected in February 2021. BKI has extended its health insurance coverage to medical expenses arising from side effects such as allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine, with premiums starting from 99 baht per year. Individuals who are already insured by BKI’s health insurance plans will automatically be covered for side effects arising from the COVID-19 vaccination at an initial cost of 79 baht per year. Thailand Privilege Card (TPC), the operator of Thailand Elite Card, is upbeat about new membership prospect after many Chinese businessmen in Myanmar are keen to apply for TPC membership amid ongoing political turmoil in the country following a military coup. TPC President Somchai Soongswang said Chinese business investors in Myanmar had contacted the company to get the Thailand residence visa in the light of ongoing political turmoil in Myanmar. TPC is still waiting official information before it can confirm the figures as currently, Myanmar has imposed a travel ban. TPC is upbeat about its membership sales in 2021. According to latest data, 2,066 applied for the Elite Card, close to its target set at 2,600 in 2021, accounting for an average of 500 membership applications per month.
Recommended publications
  • Who Is Thaksin Shinawatra?
    THE THAKSINIZATION OF THAILAND Ukrist Pathmanand Duncan McCargo Duncan McCargo and Ukrist Pathmanand For decades, Thailand was economically dynamic, yet politically shambolic. 1997 changed all that: the Asian economic crisis, closely followed by the promulgation of a new liberal constitution in Thailand, paved the way for the political rise of Thaksin Shinawatra, a fabulously wealthy telecommuni- cations magnate often compared with Italian premier Silvio Berlusconi. Although presenting itself as a national, transformative party, at heart Thaksin’s ruling Thai Rak Thai Party was little more than a vehicle for the OF THAILAND THE THAKSINIZATION interests and ambitions of its founder-leader. After winning a landslide election victory in 2001, Prime Minister Thaksin exercised an extraordinary degree of personal dominance over the Thai political scene. He was re- elected in 2005, the first Thai premier to do so. Though toppled by a military coup in 2006, Thaksin continues to exert a powerful influence on Thai poli- tics today, both in terms of his legacy and ongoing political activities. This book – by two leading scholars in the field – is an analysis of Thaksin at the height of his power. It examines Thaksin’s background, his business activities, the emergence of Thai Rak Thai, his relationship with the military, Thaksin’s use of rhetoric through media such as radio, his wider political economy networks, and what this all meant for the future. The result is essential reading for students, academics, journalists, dip- lomats, investors – and anyone else who needs to understand the Thaksin phenomenon in present-day Thailand. Winner of the 2009 Bernard Schwartz Book Award for his Tearing Apart the Land, Duncan McCargo is professor of Southeast East Asian politics at the University of Leeds.
    [Show full text]
  • European-Asian Journal of Law and Governance Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013
    European-Asian Journal of Law and Governance Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013 Editorial Board Henning Glaser Ulrike Müßig Editor in Chief Passau University Thammasat Univeristy Michael Nelson Moritz Bälz CPG, Thammasat University Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main Safri Nugraha Siegfried Broß Universitas Indonesia Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg Worachet Pakeerut Björn Dressel Thammasat University Australian National University Kittisak Prokati Dirk Ehlers Thammasat Univerisity Westfälische-Wilhelms-University Münster Seog-Yun Song Seoul National University Robert Esser Passau University Mark R. Thompson City University of Hong Kong Tom Ginsburg University of Chicago Yueh-Sheng Weng National Taiwan University Chien-Liang Lee National Taiwan University Rainer Wernsmann Passau University Peter Leyland London Metropolitan University Miroslaw Wyrzykowski Warsaw University Duc Quang Ly CPG, Thammasat University Libin Xie China University of Political Science and Law, Bartosz Makowicz Beijing European University Viadrina Frankfurt/Oder Patrick Ziegenhain Trier University Jörg Menzel University of Bonn Submissions The European-Asian Journal of Law and Governance (EAJLG) provides a forum for discussions about public law, governance and politics in order to contribute to the inter- and intra-regional discourse of academics and professionals. Contributions are welcome and accepted for consideration provided they are not submitted elsewhere or previously published. Explorative articles submitted to the European-Asian Journal of Law and Governance will be
    [Show full text]
  • Title Politics of Electoral Reform in Thailand( Dissertation 全文 )
    Title Politics of Electoral Reform in Thailand( Dissertation_全文 ) Author(s) Siripan, Nogsuan Sawasdee Citation 京都大学 Issue Date 2015-03-23 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/doctor.r12940 Right 許諾条件により本文は2015/06/01に公開 Type Thesis or Dissertation Textversion ETD Kyoto University A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Area Studies Politics of Electoral Reform in Thailand タイにおける選挙制度改革の政治 Siripan Nogsuan Sawasdee November 2014 Doctor of Area Studies A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Area Studies Politics of Electoral Reform in Thailand タイにおける選挙制度改革の政治 Siripan Nogsuan Sawasdee สิริพรรณ นกสวน สวสดั ี Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies Kyoto University November 2014 Contents Contents 1 Lists of Tables and Figures 4 List of Acronyms 6 Acknowledgements 8 Abstract 10 Chapter I: Introduction: Understanding Electoral Reform 15 1.1 Get to Know Electoral Reform 15 1.2 Electoral Reform: The Cross-National Appeals 16 1.3 Main Argument 19 1.4 Questions and the Contentions: Democracy and Electoral Reform in Thailand 22 1.5 Review Literature and Major Discourses 27 1.6 Plan of the Study 39 Chapter II: Constitutional and Electoral Rule Changes, 1932-1996 41 2.1 Five Episodes of Political Development 44 2.2 Changes to Electoral Rules, 1933-1996 59 2.3 Conclusion: the Chosen Few versus the Voice and Will of the Public 62 Chapter III: The 1997 Electoral Reform: New Modes of Political Competition 64 3.1 The Background 65 3.2 The Process 65 3.3 Public Participation 67 3.4 Introducing New Electoral System 69 3.5 First Time Popular
    [Show full text]
  • Thaksin's 2005 Electoral Triumph: Looking Back From
    Michael H. Nelson Thaksin’s 2005 Electoral Triumph: Looking Back From the Election in 2007 Working Paper Series No. 98 February 2008 The Southeast Asia Research Centre (SEARC) of the City University of Hong Kong publishes SEARC Working Papers Series electronically ©Copyright is held by the author or authors each Working Paper. SEARC Working Papers cannot be republished, reprinted, or reproduced in any format without the permission of the papers author or authors. Note: The views expressed in each paper are those of the author or authors of the paper. They do not represent the views of the Southeast Asia Research Centre, its Management Committee, or the City University of Hong Kong. Southeast Asia Research Centre Management Committee Professor William Case, Director Dr Vivienne Wee, Associate Director Dr Catherine Chiu Dr James Lee Southeast Asia Research Centre The City University of Hong Kong 83 Tat Chee Avenue Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR Tel: (852 3442 6106 Fax: (852) 3442 0103 http://www.cityu.edu.hk/searc Thaksin’s 2005 Electoral Triumph: Looking Back From the Election in 2007 Michael H. Nelson Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand Southeast Asian Studies, University of Passau, Germany [email protected] Southeast Asia Research Centre Working Paper Series, No. 98, 2008 1 After Thaksin Shinawatra had led his Thai Rak Thai (Thai Loves Thai, TRT) party to an overwhelming election victory in February 2005, by December 2007, he should have passed the half-way mark of a comfortable second term as Thailand’s incontestably elected prime minister, implementing his campaign slogan of “si pi som si pi sang” (four years of repairs, four years of building up).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11-Thailand the Second Thaksin Administration
    Chapter 11 THAILAND Kingdom of Thailand Area: 513,114 km2 Population: 64.76 million (July 2005) Capital: Bangkok Language: Thai, Lao, Chinese, Malay Religion: Theravada Buddhism and Islam Government type: Constitutional monarchy Head of state: King Bhumibol Adulyadej Currency: baht (US$1 = 40.29 baht; 2005 average) Fiscal year: October–September 289 The Second Thaksin Administration: From Victory to Turn-around to Instability TSURUYO FUNATSU t the beginning of 2005, the Thai Rak Thai Party won a landslide vic- A tory in the Thai general election and Prime Minister Thaksin set up the first one-party government in the political history of Thailand. Thaksin started his second administration on what was thought to be the strongest of foundations, but there soon occurred an accumulation of the problems inherent in the first administration, including the making of pri- vate profits by those close to the prime minister, the control of free speech in matters concerning the prime minister, and strong-arm political tactics. Taking 2005 as a whole, the government suffered mounting instability. After November 2005, political meetings calling for the resignation of the prime minister were held on a growing scale, even to point where Thaksin’s position began to look precarious. So far as the economy was concerned, the annual growth rate of GDP, at 4.5 percent, was lower than the 6.2 percent registered in 2004, suggest- ing that the boom was entering a stage of adjustment. The Thai economy was beset by three problems, namely the effects of the Indian Ocean tsunami at the end of 2004, an outbreak of avian influenza (bird flu), and a deterioration in law and order in the three southern border provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Men in Politics: Revisiting Patterns of Gendered Parliamentary
    Men in Politics Men in Politics Revisiting Patterns of Gendered Parliamentary Representation in Thailand and Beyond Elin Bjarnegård Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Brusewitzsalen, Department of Government, Gamla Torget 6, Uppsala, Friday, January 15, 2010 at 13:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Bjarnegård, E. Men in Politics. Revisiting Patterns of Gendered Parliamentary Representation in Thailand and Beyond. Statsvetenskapliga institutionen. 260pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-506-2118-1. Male parliamentary dominance, rather than the corresponding female parliamentary underrep- resentation, is the object of study in this thesis. This shift in focus implies a gendered analysis centered on men and men’s practices. The thesis contributes to our understanding of how male dominance is maintained and reinvented by empirically studying male parliamentary dominance in clientelist settings. Worldwide trends of parliamentary representation are ana- lyzed statistically and constitute the starting-point for a case study of male political networks in Thailand. Clientelism is a strategy used by political actors to increase predictability in politically unpredictable settings. The thesis shows that clientelism is an informal political practice that requires the building and maintenance of large and localized networks to help distribute ser- vices, goods and/or money in exchange for political support. Where political parties also use candidate selection procedures that are informal, exclusive and localized, there are ample openings for clientelist practices to translate into political power and ultimately parliamentary seats. This study also coins and develops a new concept: homosocial capital. It shows that clien- telist networks are and continue to be male dominated because homosocial capital, a political capital accessible only to men, is needed for electoral success.
    [Show full text]
  • Quo Vadis Thailand? Thai Politics After the 2005 Parliamentary Election[1]
    Quo Vadis Thailand? Thai Politics after the 2005 Parliamentary Election[1] Strategic Insights, Volume IV, Issue 6 (June 2005) by Aurel Croissant and Daniel J. Pojar, Jr. Strategic Insights is a monthly electronic journal produced by the Center for Contemporary Conflict at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. The views expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of NPS, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. For a PDF version of this article, click here. Introduction The parliamentary election held in Thailand on February 6, 2005, was a critical conjuncture in that country's political evolution. The election marked the decisive entrenchment of the political hegemony of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and the ruling Thai Rak Thai (TRT) party that emerged after he was elected Prime Minister in a landslide vote in January 2001. While TRT gained seventy-five percent of the seats in the House of Representatives, the main opposition force, the Democratic Party (DP), suffered a crushing defeat. Though it is evident that Thaksin and TRT won a convincing victory, it is not clear what will follow. Although TRT formed the first single party government in the history of Thailand's democracy in March 2005, it remains uncertain whether the reelected government can deal effectively with the country's urgent problems. Moreover, the election also represents the consolidation of several less positive trends that deepened over the past four years, including the division between the South and the rest of the country, problems of electoral quality, and the steady erosion of the institutions of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • British Man Killed in Andaman Pirate Attack
    Volume 16 Issue 13 News Desk - Tel: 076-236555 March 28 - April 3, 2009 Daily news at www.phuketgazette.net 25 Baht The Gazette is published Paiboon gets in association with British man killed in ‘yellow card’ Andaman pirate attack from EC By Kamol Pirat INSIDE By Khunakorn Terdkiatkhachorn SATUN: Three Burmese men were arrested by police on Tues- day, March 24 in Satun province for suspected piracy and the al- leged murder of a British man on board a private yacht when it was anchored off a remote island about 75km southwest of the mainland. On the night of Monday, March 23, British couple Malcolm Stuart Robertson, 64, and his wife Mrs Linda Anne PHUKET CITY: The Election Robertson, 60, were resting be- Mrs Robertson is helped ashore by Satun Police after a horrific ordeal at sea in which pirates attcked her and her husband on their yacht. Commission (EC) in Bangkok has ‘Mr Football’ low deck in separate compart- ‘yellow-carded’ Phuket Provin- ESPN STAR Sports presenter ments of their £3-million, 13.32- floating about 2km north of Khao registered their arrival in Phuket cial Administration Organization John Dykes talks exclusively meter yacht Mr Bean, which Yai Island, Satun Province. on January 12 and then left the President Paiboon Upatising and to the Gazette ahead of the was anchored off Dong Island in Mrs Robertson is said to province on March 9. It is not a fellow PPAO member for elec- Laguna-ESPN charity event. Satun Province, when they were have suffered minor injuries af- known whether they stayed on toral fraud in Thalang and has See page 23.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democrat and Phuea Thai Parties in Thailand's 2011 Elections
    東南亞研究中心 Southeast Asia Research Centre Michael H. NELSON Regional Research Unit Southeast Asian Studies Program School of Liberal Arts Walailak University The Democrat and Phuea Thai Parties in Thailand’s 2011 Elections: Thaksin Shinawatra Returns to Power Working Paper Series No. 139 February 2013 The Southeast Asia Research Centre (SEARC) of the City University of Hong Kong publishes SEARC Working Papers Series electronically © Copyright is held by the author or authors each Working Paper. SEARC Working Papers cannot be republished, reprinted, or reproduced in any format without the permission of the papers author or authors. Note: The views expressed in each paper are those of the author or authors of the paper. They do not represent the views of the Southeast Asia Research Centre, its Management Committee, or the City University of Hong Kong. Southeast Asia Research Centre Management Committee Professor Mark R. Thompson, Director Dr Kyaw Yin Hlaing, Associate Director Dr Chiara Formichi Dr Nicholas Thomas Dr Bill Taylor Editor of the SEARC Working Paper Series Professor Mark R. Thompson Southeast Asia Research Centre The City University of Hong Kong 83 Tat Chee Avenue Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR Tel: (852 3442 6330 Fax: (852) 3442 0103 http://www.cityu.edu.hk/searc The Democrat and Phuea Thai Parties in Thailand’s 2011 Elections: Thaksin Shinawatra Returns to Power Michael H. Nelson1 The elections of July 3, 2011, were not a routine procedure for determining which party, or coalition of parties, should govern Thailand for the next four years. From the time the outgoing coalition government led by Democrat Party chairperson Abhisit Vejjajiva took over from the remnants of Thaksin Shinawatra’s People’s Power Party (PPP), which had been dissolved by a verdict of the Constitutional Court in December 2008, it had been seen by many as having been formed illegitimately.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in the South: Participation, the State and the People
    United Nations University Press is the publishing arm of the United Nations University. UNU Press publishes scholarly and policy-oriented books and periodicals on the issues facing the United Nations and its peoples and member states, with particular emphasis upon international, regional and transboundary policies. The United Nations University was established as a subsidiary organ of the United Nations by General Assembly resolution 2951 (XXVII) of 11 December 1972. It functions as an international community of scholars engaged in research, postgraduate training and the dissemination of knowledge to address the pressing global problems of human survival, development and welfare that are the concern of the United Nations and its agencies. Its activities are devoted to advancing knowledge for human security and development and are focused on issues of peace and governance and environment and sustainable development. The Univer- sity operates through a worldwide network of research and training centres and programmes, and its planning and coordinating centre in Tokyo. Democracy in the South Democracy in the South: Participation, the state and the people Edited by Brendan Howe, Vesselin Popovski and Mark Notaras © United Nations University, 2010 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not neces- sarily refl ect the views of the United Nations University. United Nations University Press United Nations University, 53-70, Jingumae 5-chome, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8925, Japan Tel: +81-3-5467-1212 Fax: +81-3-3406-7345 E-mail: [email protected] general enquiries: [email protected] http://www.unu.edu United Nations University Offi ce at the United Nations, New York 2 United Nations Plaza, Room DC2-2062, New York, NY 10017, USA Tel: +1-212-963-6387 Fax: +1-212-371-9454 E-mail: [email protected] United Nations University Press is the publishing division of the United Nations University.
    [Show full text]