Men in Politics: Revisiting Patterns of Gendered Parliamentary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Men in Politics Men in Politics Revisiting Patterns of Gendered Parliamentary Representation in Thailand and Beyond Elin Bjarnegård Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Brusewitzsalen, Department of Government, Gamla Torget 6, Uppsala, Friday, January 15, 2010 at 13:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Bjarnegård, E. Men in Politics. Revisiting Patterns of Gendered Parliamentary Representation in Thailand and Beyond. Statsvetenskapliga institutionen. 260pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-506-2118-1. Male parliamentary dominance, rather than the corresponding female parliamentary underrep- resentation, is the object of study in this thesis. This shift in focus implies a gendered analysis centered on men and men’s practices. The thesis contributes to our understanding of how male dominance is maintained and reinvented by empirically studying male parliamentary dominance in clientelist settings. Worldwide trends of parliamentary representation are ana- lyzed statistically and constitute the starting-point for a case study of male political networks in Thailand. Clientelism is a strategy used by political actors to increase predictability in politically unpredictable settings. The thesis shows that clientelism is an informal political practice that requires the building and maintenance of large and localized networks to help distribute ser- vices, goods and/or money in exchange for political support. Where political parties also use candidate selection procedures that are informal, exclusive and localized, there are ample openings for clientelist practices to translate into political power and ultimately parliamentary seats. This study also coins and develops a new concept: homosocial capital. It shows that clien- telist networks are and continue to be male dominated because homosocial capital, a political capital accessible only to men, is needed for electoral success. Homosocial capital has two main components: a perceived pragmatic necessity to build linkages to those with access to important resources in society and a more psychological desire to cooperate with individuals whose behavior can be understood, predicted and trusted. Keywords: clientelism; political parties; representation; candidate selection; Thailand; gender; masculinities; democratization; social capital; homosociality; homosocial capital Elin Bjarnegård, Department of Government, Box 514, Uppsala University, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden Centre for Gender Research, Box 634, Uppsala University, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden © Elin Bjarnegård ISBN 978-91-506-2118-1 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-110638 (http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-110638) Omslagsfoto: Fotograf Eva Jakobsson, www.fotografeva.com Printed in Sweden by Edita Västra Aros, Västerås 2009. Acknowledgements The end of dissertation-writing is sometimes described as a watershed after which life will take a new, and better, course. I do not subscribe to that de- scription. I have, for the most part, had a great time writing this dissertation and I hope I will continue having a great time at work even now that it is fin- ished. Many people have contributed to making this journey such an enjoyable one, both by making my time as a Ph.D. Candidate pleasant, challenging and inspiring and by contributing to a fun, manageable and meaningful private life. My excellent team of supervisors, consisting of Maria Heimer, Axel Ha- denius, Erik Melander, and Martha Blomqvist, has stood by me throughout this journey, trusting me enough to give me ample freedom in planning my work and designing my study, but always eager to give good advice. An un- commonly large group of supervisors, you have each had distinct roles and areas of competence and our meetings have led to inspiring discussions. Maria, from the very start, when you were the supervisor of the new class of graduate students, you managed to ask the important and difficult questions when I needed to tackle them and to give me encouragement and support when that was more needed. You have continued to do so at the exact right moments throughout this research process and this is truly an invaluable abil- ity in a supervisor! Axel, you have been a source of inspiration ever since I worked as your research assistant and I can trace many of my research inter- ests back to you. With your broad knowledge of the field, you have contrib- uted with the greater perspective, motivating me to better situate my findings, and you have been able to identify and introduce me to other important re- searchers. Erik, you have walked with me on the sometimes winding path of statistical analysis, and I appreciate that your suggestions on suitable ways forward have been, at the same time, demanding and pragmatic. Your experi- ence of quantitative methods and of combining them with gendered ap- proaches and with qualitative research has been an important asset, as has your everlasting belief in me and my research project. Martha, your experience from gender studies and more sociologically oriented organizational studies has made me feel more secure when venturing into and being inspired by these fields. I really appreciate your careful readings of the many different versions of my manuscript as well as your constant support. But my working environment has been larger than my group of supervisors. The Department of Government is a great place for Ph. D studies, where doc- v toral students are treated like colleagues from the first day. Thus, thank you to all my colleagues for making work such a nice place to go to! My closest colleagues and friends at the Department have, without a doubt, been the wonderful people in the cohort of graduate students starting in 2003: Gelu Calacean, Josefina Erikson, Björn Lindberg and Pär Zetterberg. Lightyears from internal competitiveness, this group is overflowing with loy- alty, understanding and goodwill. Thank you for all the fun times and stimulat- ing discussions! I have worked particularly closely with Pär, and I still get kicks out of your enthusiasm for research! You have provided useful com- ments on the draft of the manuscript as well as interesting reflections on the research process more generally. I hope we will be able to realize our convic- tion that it is more fun and fruitful to conduct research in a team! I wish to extend a special thank you to Hans Blomkvist for planting the idea of doctoral studies in my head. I also wish to thank people who have partici- pated in the different seminars at the Department for constructive comments on various drafts of parts of this dissertation – in particular, Sverker Gustavs- son, Magnus Öhman, Per Adman, Sten Widmalm, Christina Bergqvist, Drude Dahlerup, Li Bennich-Björkman, Jan Teorell, Lena Wägnerud, and Torsten Svensson. I am fortunate enough to have yet another nice and inspiring work place in Uppsala through my affiliation with the Centre for Gender Studies. It is an exciting place where I have benefitted from different perspectives being shared and discussed. Special thanks go to Staffan Bergwik and Kristina Eriksson for useful comments and to Henrik Berg, Anneli Häyrén and Anna Danielsson for nice social gatherings. Thank you to photographer Eva Jacobsson for the picture on the cover of this book and Karen Williams for an excellent job proofreading the text. I have spent a great amount of time outside Sweden – doing field work in Thailand, taking courses and being a visiting scholar in the United States, and attending various conferences in different parts of the world. For the grants, scholarships and funding that made this possible I want to thank Sida-SAREC, SSAAPS, STINT, GADNET, the Borbos Erik Hansson Foundation, and the Siamon Foundation. In Thailand, I am greatly indebted to the large number of people who agreed to talk to me and who serve as informants and respondents in this study. I have learned so much from you, in so many ways! At Chulalongkorn University, I particularly want to thank Chantana Banpasirichote and Pasuk Phongpaichit for welcoming me and helping me. My contact persons Pokkrong Soontharasudth at the ECT, Pimuk Simaroj in the then Thai Rak Thai party and Pussadee Tamthai in the Democrat party made many of the interviews possible. Last, but certainly not least, my most heartfelt thanks to Pui, Patima Kalumpakorn. I don’t know what I would have done without you! Not only are you an excellent interpreter with a keen ear and cultural sensitiv- ity to all my faux pas with whom it has been wonderfully easy to work and vi travel. You have also become a dear friend who has, more than anyone, taught me about everyday life in Thailand. I spent an inspiring semester at the New School in New York City. I am particularly grateful to Mala Htun for inviting me and making the research visit possible and for giving excellent advice on the manuscript of the thesis. I also received useful feedback from the participants of the working group on gender and politics. Thank you to Vicky Hattam for arranging an office space and for giving career advice. In the United States I am also grateful to Pippa Norris, Joyce Gelb and Eileen McDonagh for your support and for giving constructive comments on different texts at various points of time. Completing this research project has taken up a great deal of time, but ac- tivities outside of work and the company of my wonderful family and friends are, to me, simply irresistible and will, inevitably, entice me away from the computer at the end of the day. Theater projects, choir rehearsals and book circle meetings have helped me recharge my batteries. Friends like Kerstin, Emilie, Lott, Anders, Karin and Dag are difficult to come by, fun to be with and good to talk to. Thank you for brightening up life! My family is important to me in more than one way.