DOCSLIB.ORG

Unequal, Unfair, Ineffective and Inefficient Gender Inequity in Health: Why It Exists and How We Can Change It Women and Gender

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unequal, Unfair, Ineffective and Inefficient Gender Inequity in Health: Why It Exists and How We Can Change It Women and Gender Unequal, Unfair, Ineffective and Inefficient Gender Inequity in Health: Why it exists and how we can change it Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health September 2007 Women and Gender Equity Knowledge Network Submitted by Gita Sen and Piroska Östlin Co-coordinators of the WGEKN1 Report writing team Gita Sen, Piroska Östlin, Asha George 1 We are very grateful to the members and corresponding members of the WGEKN, and the authors of background papers for their willingness to write, read, comment and send material. Special thanks are due to Linda Rydberg and Priya Patel for their cheerful and competent support at the different stages of this report. We would also like to thank Beena Varghese for her inputs to the report. Members Rebecca Cook Rosalind Petchesky Claudia Garcia Moreno Silvina Ramos Adrienne Germain Sundari Ravindran Veloshnee Govender Alex Scott-Samuel Caren Grown Gita Sen (Coordinator) Afua Hesse Hilary Standing Helen Keleher Debora Tajer Yunguo LIU Sally Theobald Piroska Östlin (Coordinator) Huda Zurayk Corresponding members Pat Armstrong Jennifer Klot Jill Astbury Gunilla Krantz Gary Barker Rally Macintyre Anjana Bhushan Peggy Maguire Mabel Bianco Mary Manandhar Mary Anne Burke Nomafrench Mbombo James Dwyer Geeta Rao Gupta Margrit Eichler Sunanda Ray Sahar El- Sheneity Marta Rondon Alessandra Fantini Hania Sholkamy Elsa Gómez Erna Surjadi Ana Cristina González Vélez Wilfreda Thurston Anne Hammarström Joanna Vogel Amparo Hernández-Bello Isabel Yordi Aguirre Nduku Kilonzo Authors of background papers Karina Batthyány Melissa Laurie Sonia Correa Ranjani Murthy Lucinda Franklin Piroska Östlin Asha George Loveday Penn-Kekana Veloshnee Govender Rosalind Petchesky Aditi Iyer Sundari Ravindran Helen Keleher Gita Sen Aarti Kelkar-Khambete Rachel Snow Reviewers of background papers Gary Barker Piroska Östlin Anjana Bhushan Martha Rondon Lesley Doyal Gabrielle Ross James Dwyer Gita Sen Sahar El-Sheneity Hania Sholkamy Alexandra Fantini Wilfreda Thurston Ana Cristina González Vélez Joanna Vogel Amparo Hernández Bello Huda Zurayk Peggy Maguire Mary Manandhar Other contributors Marion Stevens Tanja Houweling Göran Tomson Gabrielle Ross Susan Watts ii Acknowledgements We express our gratitude for the collective patience and expertise generously offered by Knowledge Network Members, Corresponding Members, Authors of background papers and case studies involved in this report, and their Reviewers. We are also indebted to Commissioners Hoda Rashad, Monique Begin, Mirai Chatterjee, Ndioro Ndiaye and Denny Vågerö for their guidance and support, and to Commissioner Rashad especially for hosting the Cairo meeting of the Knowledge Network. Our focal points, Gabrielle Ross from WHO and Tanja Houweling from University College London have been very supportive. Special thanks to Dorrit Alopaeus-Ståhl at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Sweden for her support and the external reviewers of the draft version of this report for their valuable comments. We thank also our colleagues in the Globalisation and Health Systems Knowledge Networks, who have been particularly helpful in sharing ideas and evidence. We thank also our institutions, the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore and the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden for giving home to the organizational hubs of the Knowledge Network. Disclaimer This work was made possible through funding provided by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Swedish National Institute of Public Health (SNIPH) and the Open Society Institute (OSI) and undertaken as work for the Women and Gender Equity Knowledge Network established as part of the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. The views presented in this work/publication/report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of WHO or Commissioners. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS POLICY BRIEFING.....................................................................................................................................................VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. XII I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................... 1 I.1 BASIC UNDERPINNINGS .............................................................................................................................................. 1 I.2 BEYOND MOTHERHOOD AND APPLE PIE..........................................................................................................................3 II. THE EVIDENCE BASE OF THE REPORT ..................................................................................................................... 5 III. DIAGNOSIS: SO WHAT’S THE PROBLEM?................................................................................................................. 6 III.1 GENDER, WOMEN, EQUITY AND EQUALITY..................................................................................................................... 6 III.2 INTERSECTING SOCIAL HIERARCHIES ........................................................................................................................... 8 III.3 SOCIAL STRATIFIERS AND STRUCTURAL PROCESSES – HOW DO THEY INTERACT?................................................................. 9 III.4 CAUSAL PATHWAYS AND A FRAMEWORK..................................................................................................................... 10 IV. GENDERED STRUCTURAL DETERMINANTS ........................................................................................................... 11 IV.1 WHAT DO WE KNOW?............................................................................................................................................. 11 IV.1.1 Gender as a social stratifier.......................................................................................................................... 12 IV.1.2 Gendered structural processes..................................................................................................................... 14 IV.1.3 Women’s movements and human rights ........................................................................................................ 21 IV.2 PROMOTING HUMAN RIGHTS AND STRENGTHENING WOMEN’S HANDS............................................................................. 22 IV.2.1 Deepening the normative framework and realizing human rights...................................................................... 23 IV.2.2 Cushioning the ‘shock absorbers’ ................................................................................................................. 24 IV.2.3 Expanding women’s capabilities – focus on education .................................................................................... 25 V. NORMS, VALUES AND PRACTICES.......................................................................................................................... 28 V.1 WHAT DO WE KNOW?.............................................................................................................................................. 28 V.1.1 How do norms work?.................................................................................................................................... 28 V.1.2 Gendered norms affecting health................................................................................................................... 30 V.2 CHALLENGING GENDER STEREOTYPES AND HOW THEY AFFECT HEALTH ............................................................................ 33 V.2.1 Create formal agreements, codes and laws to change norms that violate women’s human rights, and implement/enforce them........................................................................................................................................ 34 V.2.2 Adopting multi-level strategies to changes norms including support for women’s organisations............................ 36 V.2.3 Working with boys and men for male transformation........................................................................................ 40 VI. DIFFERENCES IN EXPOSURE AND VULNERABILITY............................................................................................... 42 VI.1. WHAT DO WE KNOW?............................................................................................................................................ 42 VI.1.1. Mapping male-female differences in health ................................................................................................... 42 VI.1.2. Understanding male-female differences in health........................................................................................... 43 VI.1.3. Exposure and vulnerability due to both sex and gender.................................................................................. 45 VI.1.4. Exposure and vulnerability due primarily to gender ........................................................................................ 48 VI.2. REDUCING THE HEALTH RISKS OF BEING WOMEN AND MEN............................................................................................ 51 VI.2.1 Meeting differential health needs .................................................................................................................. 51 VI.2.2. Tackling social bias
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Qualitative Exploration
    “I CAN FEEL IT MORE THAN I CAN SAY IT”: A QUALITATIVE EXPLORATION OF BLACK WOMANHOOD A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Myriam Tamouhan Kadeba December, 2017 “I CAN FEEL IT MORE THAN I CAN SAY IT”: A QUALITATIVE EXPLORATION OF BLACK WOMANHOOD Myriam Tamouhan Kadeba Dissertation Approved: Accepted: ______________________________ ______________________________ Advisor Department Chair Suzette L. Speight, Ph.D. Paul Levy, Ph.D. ______________________________ ______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College Amber Hewitt, Ph.D. John Green, Ph.D. ______________________________ ______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dawn Johnson, Ph.D. Chand Midha, Ph.D. ______________________________ ______________________________ Committee Member Date Delila Owens, Ph.D. ______________________________ Committee Member Nicole Rousseau, Ph.D. ______________________________ Committee Member John Queener, Ph.D. ii ABSTRACT Black Womanhood has been historically defined as antithetical to the normative feminine ideals in the United States. This hegemonic femininity prescribes standards that are considered ideals in describing the archetypical feminine woman. Black women have been stereotyped as unfeminine and unattractive, and this negative and pervasive social rhetoric continue to have a long lasting adverse impact on this population. Black feminist scholars have long articulated the importance of defining Black womanhood not in relation to hegemonic femininity, but by incorporating the actual experiences of Black women. Using an interpretative phenomenological methodology and based on interviews with Black women in the United States, the current study investigated Black women’s notion of womanhood. This study uncovered ways participants self-defined, resisted negative and oppressive societal messages, and celebrated their own Black Womanhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Inequality and Restrictive Gender Norms: Framing the Challenges to Health
    Series Gender Equality, Norms, and Health 1 Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health Lori Heise*, Margaret E Greene*, Neisha Opper, Maria Stavropoulou, Caroline Harper, Marcos Nascimento, Debrework Zewdie, on behalf of the Gender Equality, Norms, and Health Steering Committee† Lancet 2019; 393: 2440–54 Gender is not accurately captured by the traditional male and female dichotomy of sex. Instead, it is a complex social Published Online system that structures the life experience of all human beings. This paper, the first in a Series of five papers, investigates May 30, 2019 the relationships between gender inequality, restrictive gender norms, and health and wellbeing. Building upon past http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ work, we offer a consolidated conceptual framework that shows how individuals born biologically male or female S0140-6736(19)30652-X develop into gendered beings, and how sexism and patriarchy intersect with other forms of discrimination, such as See Comment pages 2367, 2369, 2371, 2373, and 2374 racism, classism, and homophobia, to structure pathways to poor health. We discuss the ample evidence showing the This is the first in a Series of far-reaching consequences of these pathways, including how gender inequality and restrictive gender norms impact five papers about gender health through differential exposures, health-related behaviours and access to care, as well as how gender-biased health equality, norms, and health research and health-care systems reinforce and reproduce gender inequalities, with serious implications for health. *Joint first authors The cumulative consequences of structured disadvantage, mediated through discriminatory laws, policies, and †Members of the Steering institutions, as well as diet, stress, substance use, and environmental toxins, have triggered important discussions Committee are listed at the end about the role of social injustice in the creation and maintenance of health inequities, especially along racial and of this Series paper socioeconomic lines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Variety of Feminisms and Their Contribution to Gender Equality
    JUDITH LORBER The Variety of Feminisms and their Contribution to Gender Equality Introduction My focus is the continuities and discontinuities in recent feminist ideas and perspectives. I am going to discuss the development of feminist theories as to the sources of gender inequality and its pervasiveness, and the different feminist political solutions and remedies based on these theories. I will be combining ideas from different feminist writers, and usually will not be talking about any specific writers. A list of readings can be found at the end. Each perspective has made important contributions to improving women's status, but each also has limitations. Feminist ideas of the past 35 years changed as the limitations of one set of ideas were critiqued and addressed by what was felt to be a better set of ideas about why women and men were so unequal. It has not been a clear progression by any means, because many of the debates went on at the same time. As a matter of fact, they are still going on. And because all of the feminist perspectives have insight into the problems of gender inequality, and all have come up with good strategies for remedying these problems, all the feminisms are still very much with us. Thus, there are continuities and convergences, as well as sharp debates, among the different feminisms. Any one feminist may incorporate ideas from several perspec- tives, and many feminists have shifted their perspectives over the years. I myself was originally a liberal feminist, then a so- 8 JUDITH LORBER cialist feminist, and now consider myself to be primarily a so- cial construction feminist, with overtones of postmodernism and queer theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More
    THE UNHAPPY MARRIAGE OF MARXISM AND FEMINISM TOWARDS A MORE PROGRESSIVE UNION Heidi I . Hartmann This paper argues that the relation between marxism and feminism has, in all the forms it has so far taken, been an unequal one . While both marxist method and feminist analysis are necessary to an understanding of capi- talist societies, and of the position of women within them, in fact femi- nism has consistently been subordinated . The paper presents a challenge to both marxist and radical feminist work on the "woman question", and argues that what it is necessary to analyse is the combination of patriarchy and capitalism . It is a paper which, we hope, should stimulate considerable debate . The 'marriage' of marxism and feminism has been like the marriage of husband and wife depicted in English common law : marxism and feminism are one, and that one is marxism (1). Recent attempts to integrate marxism and feminism are unsatisfactory to us as feminists because they subsume the feminist struggle into the 'larger' struggle against capital . To continue our simile further, either we need a healthier marriage or we need a divorce . The inequalities in this marriage, like most social phenomena, are no accident . Many marxists typically argue that feminism is at best less impor- tant than class conflict and at worst divisive of the working class . This political stance produces an analysis that absorbs feminism into the class struggle . Moreover, the analytic power of marxism with respect to capital has obscured its limitations with respect to sexism . We will argue here that while marxist analysis provides essential insight into the laws of historical development, and those of capital in particular, the categories of marxism are sex-blind .
    [Show full text]
  • Ms.Mabelbianco Argentina E.Pdf
    Biographical data form of candidates to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Name (family name, first name): Bianco, Mabel Beatriz Nationality: Argentinean Date and place of birth: 1 April 1941 – Buenos Aires City, Argentina Working languages: Spanish, English, Portuguese, French. Current position/function: Mabel Bianco is President of Fundación para Estudio e Investigación de la Mujer –FEIM- and is member of the UN WOMEN Regional Office Advisory Group and founder and Co-Chair of the Committee of NGOs on CSW from Latin America and the Caribbean. FEIM was created by Mabel Bianco in 1989 and works to improve women’s status in Argentina, Latin America and the Caribbean and globally. She is Chair of the GCWA Advisory Group. Main professional activities: She was Associate Professor in the Public Health School at UBA and in the School of Medicine in Universidad de El Salvador (1967-85). She was founder and researcher and Chief of Research Department of the Epidemiological Research Center (1978-85). In 1984, she created the Women, Health and Development Program in the Argentine National Ministry of Health and in 1985-89 she was National Director of the International Affairs Office of such Ministry. In 2000 she was Chief of National Program of HIV/AIDS and STDs at the National Ministry of Health and World Bank-supported project LUSIDA. She has been advisor of UN agencies: PAHO/WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, UNAIDS and UNDP. She has also integrated research groups at regional and international level as advisor for international foundations and board member in different organizations. She participated in UN regional and global conferences and was part of the Argentine delegation in many of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributive Egalitarianism, the Complete-Life View, and Age Discrimination
    Thirteen SOCIAL INJUSTICE: DISTRIBUTIVE EGALITARIANISM, THE COMPLETE-LIFE VIEW, AND AGE DISCRIMINATION Richard Wagland There are “two different kinds of valuable equality” that might be distin- guished within contemporary political thought.1 The first kind is distributive in nature and specifies that justice requires benefits of a certain kind to be distributed equally. Equality of the second kind does not directly specify any particular distribution of benefits, but instead identifies a “social ideal” of “a society in which people regard and treat each other as equals.”2 These two forms of equality can be labeled “distributive equality” and “social equality.” It is equality of the first kind that has been the focus of much contemporary liberal political philosophy over the last three decades since the publication of John Rawls’s A Theory of Justice,3 and it is that form of equality that is the focus of this chapter. It might be argued that egalitarians should pursue both conceptions of equality simultaneously, perhaps because one is just an alternative expression of the other. Nevertheless, one of the main claims of this chapter is that these conceptions do in fact conflict, at least when it comes to the treatment of older persons. The reason they conflict is that for a distributive egalitarian theory to be plausible it must ensure that benefits are distributed diachronically between the separate complete lives of individuals, rather than at temporally synchron- ic moments within their lives. As we shall see, this in turn justifies age- discriminatory policies that are not compatible with the ideal of social equali- ty.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quantum Leap for Gender Equality: for a Better Future of Work For
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A QUANTUM LEAP FORA QUANTUM GENDER LEAP EQUALITYFOR GENDER For a Better Future ofEQUALITY Work For All For a Better Future of Work For All Copyright © International Labour Organization 2019 First published (2019) Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH- 1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. A quantum leap for gender equality : for a better future of work for all / International Labour Office. - Geneva: ILO, 2019. ISBN: 978-92-2-132997-8 (print); 978-92-2-132998-5 (web pdf) International Labour Office. gender equality / women workers / future of work / equal employment opportunity / womens rights / equal pay / working conditions / social protection / care work / unpaid work / ILO Convention / application / role of ILO 04.02.3 ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • WID to GAD: Conceptual Shifts in the Women and Development Discourse
    From WID to GAD: Conceptual Shifts in the Women and Development Discourse Shahrashoub Razavi Carol Miller Occasional Paper 1, February 1995 United Nations Research Institute for Social Development United Nations Development Programme The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is an autonomous agency that engages in multi-disciplinary research on the social dimensions of contemporary problems affecting development. Its work is guided by the conviction that, for effective development policies to be formulated, an understanding of the social and political context is crucial. The Institute attempts to provide governments, development agencies, grassroots organizations and scholars with a better understanding of how development policies and processes of economic, social and environmental change affect different social groups. Working through an extensive network of national research centres, UNRISD aims to promote original research and strengthen research capacity in developing countries. Current research themes include Crisis, Adjustment and Social Change; Socio- Economic and Political Consequences of the International Trade in Illicit Drugs; Environment, Sustainable Development and Social Change; Integrating Gender into Development Policy; Participation and Changes in Property Relations in Communist and Post-Communist Societies; and Political Violence and Social Movements. UNRISD research projects focused on the 1995 World Summit for Social Development include Rethinking Social Development in the 1990s; Economic Restructuring and Social Policy; Ethnic Diversity and Public Policies; and The Challenge of Rebuilding War-torn Societies. A list of the Institute’s free and priced publications can be obtained from the Reference Centre. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development Palais des Nations 1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland (41.22) 798.84.00/798.58.50 Fax (41.22) 740.07.91 Note: The pagination of the electronic version of this paper may differ from the printed publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Women 2010 Trends and Statistics
    ST/ESA/STAT/SER.K/19 Department of Economic and Social Affairs The World's Women 2010 Trends and Statistics asdf United Nations New York, 2010 Department of Economic and Social Affairs The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environmental data and information on which States Members of the United Nations draw to review common problems and take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Note The designations employed and the presentation of material in the present report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The term “country” as used in the text of this report also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. The designations “developed” and “developing” countries or areas and “more developed” and “less developed” regions are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgement about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology: an International 11
    WOMEN'S STUDIES LIBRARIAN The University ofWisconsin System EMINIST ERIODICALS A CURRENT LISTING OF CONTENTS VOLUME 13, NUMBER 3 FALL 1993 Published by Phyllis Holman Weisbard Women's Studies Librarian University of Wisconsin System 430 Memorial Library / 728 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (608) 263-5754 EMINIST ERIODICALS A CURRENT LISTING OF CONTENTS Volume 13, Number 3 Fall 1993 Periodical literature is the cutting edge of women's scholarship, feminist theory, and much ofwomen'sculture. Feminist Periodicals: A Current Listing of Contents is published by the Office of the University of Wisconsin System Women's Studies Librarian on a quarterly basis with the intent of increasing pUblic awareness of feminist periodicals. It is our hope that Feminist Periodicals will serve several purposes: to keep the reader abreast of current topics in feminist literature; to increase readers' familiarity with a wide spectrum of feminist periodicals; and to provide the requisite bibliographic information should a reader wish to subscribe to ajournal or to obtain a particular article at her library or through interlibrary lOan. (Users will need to be aware of the limitations of the new copyright law with regard to photocopying of copyrighted materials.) Tabie of contents pages from current issues of majorfeminist journals are reproduced in each issue ofFeminist Periodicals, preceded by a comprehensive annotated listing of all journals we have selected. As pUblication schedules vary enormously, not every periodical will have table of contents pages reproduced in each issue of IT. The annotated listing provides the following information on each journal: 1. Year of first publication. 2. Frequency of pUblication.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaming and Suppression of Female Sexuality
    THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CLINICAL SEXOLOGY SHAMING AND SUPPRESSION OF FEMALE SEXUALITY AN IN DEPTH LOOK AT THE EVOLUTION OF HUMAN SEXUALITY, GENDER ROLES, FEMALE LIBERATION, AND LONG TERM EFFECTS OF SHAMING OF FEMALE SEXUALITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CLINICAL SEXOLOGY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY INGRID D.THRALL ORLANDO FLORIDA ii Copyright © 2017 by Ingrid D. Thrall All Rights Reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members; Dr. Claudia Rieman, for her guidance and support, and most of all for inspiring and encouraging me to pursue my doctoral degree at The American Academy of Clinical Sexology; Dr. Julia Breur for her input and for encouraging me to enjoy the process; Dr. William Granzig for his ubiquitous reassurance, sharing of his vast knowledge, and challenging me to think outside the box. I would like to thank my husband Ed for his unwavering love and support of all my endeavors and always believing in me. I would like to thank my son Jonathan for his faith in me in my pursuit of my passion and for allowing me to inspire him to pursue his own journey in the field of Psychology. I would like to thank each and every woman who took the time to participate in the survey. Without these wonderful women this project would not have been possible. iv VITA Ingrid D. Thrall is a graduate of Nova Southeastern University where she earned a Master of Science degree in Mental Health Counseling Psychology. She is a member of AASECT.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy
    NIKO KOLODNY Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy What is to be said for democracy? Not that it gives people what they want. Not that it realizes a kind of autonomy or self-government. Not that it provides people with the opportunity for valuable activities of civic engagement. Not, at least not in the first instance, that it avoids insulting them. Or so I argued in the companion to this article.1 At the end of that article, I suggested that the justification of democ- racy rests instead on the fact that democracy is a particularly important constituent of a society in which people are related to one another as social equals, as opposed to social inferiors or superiors. The concern for democracy is rooted in a concern not to have anyone else above—or, for I am grateful for written comments on this article and its companion (as well as on their distant ancestors) from Arthur Ripstein, Japa Pallikkathayil, Samuel Scheffler, Jay Wallace, Fabienne Peter, Adam Hill, Dylan Murray, Joseph Raz (and his seminar), Jerry Vildostegui, Amanda Greene, Alan Patten, Liz Harman, Peter Graham, Samuel Freeman, Joseph Moore, Mike Arsenault, Mike Diaz, Dan Khokhar, Dustin Neuman, Ben Chen, Nick French, Daniel Viehoff, and two anonymous referees for Philosophy & Public Affairs. I am also grateful for responses from participants at BAFFLE at Berkeley in fall 2010; Ronald Dworkin and Thomas Nagel’s Colloquium in Legal, Political, and Social Philosophy at NYU in fall 2010; my graduate seminars at Berkeley in spring 2011 and 2014; Joseph Raz’s seminar at Colum- bia Law School in fall 2011; a Political Philosophy Colloquium at Princeton in fall 2011;a colloquium at the Ohio State University in 2011; the Darrell K.
    [Show full text]