"Design of Engineering Systems in Polish Mines in the Second Half of the 20Th Century"
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Translation of the Eugene Dynkin Interview with Evgenii Mikhailovich Landis
Translation of the Eugene Dynkin Interview with Evgenii Mikhailovich Landis E. B. Dynkin: September 2, 1990. Moscow, Hotel of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. E. B.: Let's begin at the beginning. You entered the university before the war? E. M.: I entered the university before the war, in 1939. I had been there two months when I was recruited into the army---then the army recruited people the way they did up to a year ago. So there I was in the army, and there I stayed till the end of the war. First I was in Finland\footnote{Finnish-Russian war, November 30, 1939-March 12, 1940, essentially a Soviet war of aggression. Hostilities were renewed in June 1941, when Germany invaded the USSR.}, where I was wounded, and for some time after that was on leave. Then I returned to the army, and then the war began\footnote{On June 22, 1941, when Germany invaded the USSR.} and I was in the army for the whole of the war. E. B.: In what branch? E. M.: At first I was in the infantry, and after returning from Finland and recovering from my wound, I ended up in field artillery. E. B.: The probability of surviving the whole of the war as a foot-soldier would have been almost zero. E. M.: I think that this would have been true also in artillery, since this was field artillery, and that is positioned very close to the front. But this is how it was. When the counter-attack before Moscow began in the spring of 1942, our unit captured a German vehicle---a field ambulance, fully fitted out with new equipment, complete with a set of instructions---in German, naturally. -
Calendar of AMS Meetings and Conferences
Calendar of AMS Meetings and Conferences This calendar lists all meetings and conferences approved prior to the date this insofar as is possible. Abstracts should be submitted on special forms which are issue went to press. The summer and annual meetings are joint meetings of the available in many departments of mathematics and from the headquarters office of Mathematical Association of America and the American Mathematical Society. The the Society. Abstracts of papers to be presented at the meeting must be received meeting dates which fall rather far in the future are subject to change; this is par at the headquarters of the Society in Providence, Rhode Island, on or before the ticularly true of meetings to which no numbers have been assigned. Programs of deadline given below for the meeting. The abstract deadlines listed below should the meetings will appear in the issues indicated below. First and supplementary be carefully reviewed since an abstract deadline may expire before publication of announcements of the meetings will have appeared in earlier issues. Abstracts a first announcement. Note that the deadline for abstracts for consideration for of papers presented at a meeting of the Society are published in the journal Ab presentation at special sessions is usually three weeks earlier than that specified stracts of papers presented to the American Mathematical Society in the issue below. For additional information, consult the meeting announcements and the list corresponding to that of the Notices which contains the program of the meeting, of special sessions. Meetings Abstract Program Meeting# Date Place Deadline Issue 876 * October 30-November 1 , 1992 Dayton, Ohio August 3 October 877 * November ?-November 8, 1992 Los Angeles, California August 3 October 878 * January 13-16, 1993 San Antonio, Texas OctoberS December (99th Annual Meeting) 879 * March 26-27, 1993 Knoxville, Tennessee January 5 March 880 * April9-10, 1993 Salt Lake City, Utah January 29 April 881 • Apnl 17-18, 1993 Washington, D.C. -
ENHANCED DYNKIN DIAGRAMS DONE RIGHT Introduction
ENHANCED DYNKIN DIAGRAMS DONE RIGHT V. MIGRIN AND N. VAVILOV Introduction In the present paper we draw the enhanced Dynkin diagrams of Eugene Dynkin and Andrei Minchenko [8] for senior exceptional types Φ = E6; E7 and E8 in a right way, `ala Rafael Stekolshchik [26], indicating not just adjacency, but also the signs of inner products. Two vertices with inner product −1 will be joined by a solid line, whereas two vertices with inner product +1 will be joined by a dotted line. Provisionally, in the absense of a better name, we call these creatures signed en- hanced Dynkin diagrams. They are uniquely determined by the root system Φ itself, up to [a sequence of] the following tranformations: changing the sign of any vertex and simultaneously switching the types of all edges adjacent to that vertex. Theorem 1. Signed enhanced Dynkin diagrams of types E6, E7 and E8 are depicted in Figures 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In this form such diagrams contain not just the extended Dynkin diagrams of all root subsystems of Φ | that they did already by Dynkin and Minchenko [8] | but also all Carter diagrams [6] of conjugacy classes of the corresponding Weyl group W (Φ). Theorem 2. The signed enhanced Dynkin diagrams of types E6, E7 and E8 contain all Carter|Stekolshchik diagrams of conjugacy classes of the Weyl groups W (E6), W (E7) and W (E8). In both cases the non-parabolic root subsystems, and the non-Coxeter conjugacy classes occur by exactly the same single reason, the exceptional behaviour of D4, where the fundamental subsystem can be rewritten as 4 A1, or as a 4-cycle, respectively, which constitutes one of the most manifest cases of the octonionic mathematics [2], so plumbly neglected by Vladimir Arnold (mathematica est omnis divisa in partes tres, see [1]). -
February 2012
LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER No. 411 February 2012 Society NEW YEAR (www.pugwash.org/) and ‘his Meetings role from the 1960s onward in HONOURS LIST 2012 rebuilding the mathematical ties and Events Congratulations to the following between European countries, who have been recognised in the particularly via the European 2012 New Year Honours list: Mathematical Society (EMS)’. Friday 24 February The ambassador went on to say, Mary Cartwright Knight Bachelor (KB) ‘[and] many people remember Lecture, London Simon Donaldson, FRS, Profes- the care you took when you [page 7] sor of Mathematics, Imperial were President of the Royal So- College London, for services to ciety, to cultivate closer ties with 26–30 March mathematics. [our] Académie des Sciences’. LMS Invited Lectures, Glasgow [page 11] 1 Commander of the Order of the MATHEMATICS Friday 27 April British Empire (CBE) POLICY ROUND-UP Women in Ursula Martin, Professor of Com- Mathematics Day, puter Science and Vice-Principal January 2012 of Science and Engineering, London [page 13] RESEARCH Queen Mary, University of Lon- Saturday 19 May don, for services to computer CMS registers ongoing concerns Poincaré Meeting, science. over EPSRC Fellowships London The Council for the Mathemati- Wednesday 6 June FRENCH HONOUR cal Sciences (CMS) has written Northern Regional to EPSRC to register its major Meeting, Newcastle FOR SIR MICHAEL continuing concerns about the [page 5] ATIYAH scope and operation of EPSRC Fellowships and other schemes Friday 29 June Former LMS President Sir Michael to support early-career research- Meeting and Hardy Atiyah, OM, FRS, FRSE has been ers in the mathematical sciences. -
Leaders of Polish Mathematics Between the Two World Wars
COMMENTATIONES MATHEMATICAE Vol. 53, No. 2 (2013), 5-12 Roman Duda Leaders of Polish mathematics between the two world wars To Julian Musielak, one of the leaders of post-war Poznań mathematics Abstract. In the period 1918-1939 mathematics in Poland was led by a few people aiming at clearly defined but somewhat different goals. They were: S. Zaremba in Cracow, W. Sierpiński and S. Mazurkiewicz in Warsaw, and H. Steinhaus and S. Banach in Lvov. All were chairmen and editors of mathematical journals, and each promoted several students to continue their efforts. They were highly successful both locally and internationally. When Poland regained its independence in 1918, Polish mathematics exploded like a supernova: against a dark background there flared up, in the next two deca- des, the Polish Mathematical School. Although the School has not embraced all mathematics in the country, it soon attracted common attention for the whole. Ho- wever, after two decades of a vivid development the School ended suddenly also like a supernova and together with it there silenced, for the time being, the rest of Polish mathematics. The end came in 1939 when the state collapsed under German and Soviet blows from the West and from the East, and the two occupants cooperated to cut short Polish independent life. After 1945 the state and mathematics came to life again but it was a different state and a different mathematics. The aim of this paper is to recall great leaders of the short-lived interwar Polish mathematics. By a leader we mean here a man enjoying an international reputation (author of influential papers or monographs) and possessing a high position in the country (chairman of a department of mathematics in one of the universities), a man who had a number of students and promoted several of them to Ph.D. -
Memorial Statements
MEMORIAL STATEMENTS Cornell University Faculty 2016-2017 Office of the Dean of Faculty Ithaca, New York Table of Contents 5 Marvin I. Adleman 9 Martin Alexander 14 Bruce L. Anderson 17 John M. Bird 21 Arthur L. Bloom 25 Malcolm C. Bourne 32 Muriel S. Brink 35 Harlan B. Brumsted 41 Harold R. Capener 44 Susan M. Christopherson 49 Roger C. Cramton 52 Marjorie M. Devine 55 Alan Dobson 58 Clifford J. Earle 63 Chester Forshey 68 James W. Gair 74 Robert Gowin 79 Lawrence S. Hamilton 85 Peter C. Hinkle 88 Wolfgang Holdheim 91 Robert E. Hughes 94 Karel J. Husa 98 Lynne H. Irwin 102 Andre T. Jagendorf 106 Ann Johnson 110 Richard P. Korf 114 Arthur S. Lieberman 118 Theodore J. Lowi 124 Russell E. MacDonald 126 Franklin K. Moore 132 Mary A. Morrison 135 Edwin B. Oyer 139 Richard H. Penner 142 Gregory Poe 146 Herbert Schryver 149 Alain Seznec 2 153 Daniel G. Sisler 158 Seymour Smidt 162 Donald F. Smith 166 Robert J. Smith 170 Rose Steidl 173 Gilbert S. Stoewsand 177 Mark A. Turnquist 184 Natalie W. Uhl 190 David B. Wilson 194 Paul Yarbrough 197 Milton Zaitlin 201 Robert Zall 3 Preface The University Faculty has always followed the practice of including within the faculty records a memorial resolution on the death of one of its members. The faculty modified this custom that was begun in the earliest days of Cornell University in 1938 as follows: Upon the death of a member of the University Faculty, the President or Dean of Faculty shall formally notify the Faculty at the next meeting and those present shall rise in respect for the memory of the deceased member. -
Notes on Stochastic Processes
Notes on stochastic processes Paul Keeler March 20, 2018 This work is licensed under a “CC BY-SA 3.0” license. Abstract A stochastic process is a type of mathematical object studied in mathemat- ics, particularly in probability theory, which can be used to represent some type of random evolution or change of a system. There are many types of stochastic processes with applications in various fields outside of mathematics, including the physical sciences, social sciences, finance and economics as well as engineer- ing and technology. This survey aims to give an accessible but detailed account of various stochastic processes by covering their history, various mathematical definitions, and key properties as well detailing various terminology and appli- cations of the process. An emphasis is placed on non-mathematical descriptions of key concepts, with recommendations for further reading. 1 Introduction In probability and related fields, a stochastic or random process, which is also called a random function, is a mathematical object usually defined as a collection of random variables. Historically, the random variables were indexed by some set of increasing numbers, usually viewed as time, giving the interpretation of a stochastic process representing numerical values of some random system evolv- ing over time, such as the growth of a bacterial population, an electrical current fluctuating due to thermal noise, or the movement of a gas molecule [120, page 7][51, page 46 and 47][66, page 1]. Stochastic processes are widely used as math- ematical models of systems and phenomena that appear to vary in a random manner. They have applications in many disciplines including physical sciences such as biology [67, 34], chemistry [156], ecology [16][104], neuroscience [102], and physics [63] as well as technology and engineering fields such as image and signal processing [53], computer science [15], information theory [43, page 71], and telecommunications [97][11][12]. -
1995 Steele Prizes
steele.qxp 4/27/98 3:29 PM Page 1288 1995 Steele Prizes Three Leroy P. Steele Prizes were presented at The text that follows contains, for each award, the awards banquet during the Summer Math- the committee’s citation, the recipient’s response fest in Burlington, Vermont, in early August. upon receiving the award, and a brief bio- These prizes were established in 1970 in honor graphical sketch of the recipient. of George David Birkhoff, William Fogg Osgood, and William Caspar Graustein Edward Nelson: 1995 Steele Prize for and are endowed under the Seminal Contribution to Research terms of a bequest from The 1995 Leroy P. Steele award for research of Leroy P. Steele. seminal importance goes to Professor Edward The Steele Prizes are Nelson of Princeton University for the following ...for a research awarded in three categories: two papers in mathematical physics character- for a research paper of fun- ized by leaders of the field as extremely innov- paper of damental and lasting impor- ative: tance, for expository writing, 1. “A quartic interaction in two dimensions” in fundamental and for cumulative influence Mathematical Theory of Elementary Particles, and lasting extending over a career, in- MIT Press, 1966, pages 69–73; cluding the education of doc- 2. “Construction of quantum fields from Markoff importance, toral students. The current fields” in Journal of Functional Analysis 12 award is $4,000 in each cate- (1973), 97–112. for expository gory. In these papers he showed for the first time The recipients of the 1995 how to use the powerful tools of probability writing, and for Steele Prizes are Edward Nel- theory to attack the hard analytic questions of son for seminal contribution constructive quantum field theory, controlling cumulative to research, Jean-Pierre Serre renormalizations with Lp estimates in the first influence for mathematical exposition, paper and, in the second, turning Euclidean and John T. -
Recollections and Notes, Vol. 2 (1945–1968) Translated by Abe
Vita Mathematica 19 Hugo Steinhaus Mathematician for All Seasons Recollections and Notes, Vol. 2 (1945–1968) Translated by Abe Shenitzer Edited by Robert G. Burns, Irena Szymaniec and Aleksander Weron Vita Mathematica Volume 19 Edited by Martin MattmullerR More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/4834 Hugo Steinhaus Mathematician for All Seasons Recollections and Notes, Vol. 2 (1945–1968) Translated by Abe Shenitzer Edited by Robert G. Burns, Irena Szymaniec and Aleksander Weron Author Hugo Steinhaus (1887–1972) Translator Abe Shenitzer Brookline, MA, USA Editors Robert G. Burns Department of Mathematics and Statistics York University Toronto, Ontario, Canada Irena Szymaniec Wrocław, Poland Aleksander Weron The Hugo Steinhaus Center Wrocław University of Technology Wrocław, Poland Vita Mathematica ISBN 978-3-319-23101-3 ISBN 978-3-319-23102-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23102-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015954183 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. -
The Problem of Intuition in Mathematics in the Thoughts And
RUCH FILOZOFICZNY LXXV 2019 4 Wiesław Wójcik Jan Długosz University, Częstochowa, Poland ORCID: 0000-0001-8132-3212 e-mail: [email protected] The Problem of Intuition in Mathematics in the Thoughts and Creativity of Selected Polish Mathematicians in the Context of the Nineteenth-Century Breakthrough in Mathematics DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/RF.2019.063 Introduction Intuition is attributed to various properties. It is rather widely accepted as a kind of cognition and an essential element of the cognitive process. All attempts to replace it with formalization or rationalization ended with the discovery of the next, ”layers” of intuition, its functions and meanings. The formalization itself turned out to be strongly associated with intuition, and, even in rational thinking and cognition, intuition was found as it is necessary component. It is assumed, as opposed to discursive cognition, that it is direct, which means that it is not using in- ferences, proofs, symbols and language. This cognition uses images, it is sensible and holistic. Often, its action is not fully conscious and seems to be a part of the subconscious. It often appears as a component of cre- ativity in the form of inspirations, revelations, and sudden discoveries. Sometimes it leads infallibly to the goal, but often also deceives; intu- ition is attributed to both, feelings and reason. It is spread somewhere between the mystical (extrasensory), abstract and concrete, sensual and individual states. 160 Wiesław Wójcik Despite its ambiguous status, intuition also appears in cognition and mathematical creativity. It seems that its elimination from mathematics (and such attempts were made) is not possible, and striving towards its complete removal has led to adverse effects, e.g. -
Kazirnierz Urbanik, the Founder and Editor-In-Chief of This Journal, And
PROBABrnY AND ' MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS Kazirnierz Urbanik, the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of this journal, and Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at Wroclaw University, died of cancer Sunday, May 29, 2005, at the age of 75. His research, teaching and adrninis- trative work was decisive in creation of a major school in probability theory in Poland. Born in Krzernieniec in Eastern Poland, following the end of World War I1 and transfer of the city to Western Ukraine, he moved with his family to the western Polish territory of Lower Silesia, where he lived for the next sixty years, almost all of them in the regional capital city of Wrociaw. Urbanik, a two-term Rector of Wroclaw University and an Ordinary Member of the Polish Academy of Sciences, led the Institute of Mathematics in Wroclaw for several decades. His over 180 published scientific papers develop- ed novel approaches to problems of probability theory, the theory of stochas- tic processes, mathematical physics, and information theory. Today they are well known in the global mathematics research community. His favored tools were functional and analytic but he did not shrink from tackling diEicult un- soIved problems in universal algebra either. As an educator Urbanik was the principal advisor of seventeen doctoral students, who continued work on his ideas at academic institutions of five continents. His fairness, warmth, generosity and devotion to them were legen- dary and they reciprocated in kind. He loved doing and teaching mathematics and despite his long and incapacitating illness, about which he never com- plained, continued working with the students, publishing and fulfilling his edi- torial duties almost to the last days of his life. -
Kazimierz Kuratowski (Warsaw)
Kazimierz Kuratowski (Warsaw) THE PAST AND THE PRESENT OF THE POLISH SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS I am concentrating in this article on two main subjects. Firstly: I am trying to answer the question what brought about such an “explosion” of mathematics in a country in whose scientific tradition there was hardly any mathematics and which happened at the time when after an over-one-century-long foreign rule the nation was trying hard to reconstruct its now independent country, ravaged by the First World War. Secondly: was this explosion a short-lived enthusiasm or, on the contrary, the Polish school of .mathematics struck roots so deeply that it was sub sequently able to survive the cataclysm of the Second World War and rebuild in the new circumastances — in People’s Poland — the internationally re cognized edifice of Polish mathematics? There will be in this article no mathematical theorems, no definitions or geometrical constructions. I shall be trying to use the language which can be understood without mathematical qualifications. It is therefore my hope that this text will be intelligible not only to mathematicians.1 1. PRECURSORS OF THE POLISH SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS It was the years 1918—1920 when the Polish School of Mathematics was emerging. Before describing this period and the subsequent years one should, I think, review, be it only summarily, the contemporary state of Polish mathematics. I am going to mention those of its representatives the majority of whom had in fact been active in the 19th century but who also worked in the 20th century and so could influence the formation of the School of Mathematics being thus its precursors as it were.