RBC Transfusion Burden, Median

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RBC Transfusion Burden, Median Abstract Number Assessment of dose-dependent response to luspatercept in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic EP812 Scientific Content on Demand syndromes with ring sideroblasts in the phase 3 MEDALIST trial To request a copy of this poster: Uwe Platzbecker,1 Pierre Fenaux,2 Ghulam J. Mufti,3 Guillermo Garcia-Manero,4 Rami S. Komrokji,5 Rena Buckstein,6 María Diez-Campelo,7 Carlo Finelli,8 Mikkael A. Sekeres,9 Dominik Selleslag,10 Amy E. DeZern,11 Bruno Quesnel,12 Odile Beyne-Rauzy,13 Maria Teresa Voso,14 Peter L. Greenberg,15 Amer M. Zeidan,16 Lionel Adès,2 Amit Verma,17 Michael R. Savona,18 Abderrahmane Laadem,19 Rodrigo Ito,19 Jennie Zhang,19 Anita Rampersad,19 Jessica Morison,19 Chrystal U. Louis,19 Peter G. Linde,20 Valeria Santini21 1Medical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; 2Service d’Hématologie Séniors, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris 7, Paris, France; 3Department of Haemato-Oncology, King's College London, London, UK; 4Department of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 5Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; 6Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; 7Hematology Department, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 8Department of Oncology and Hematology, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy; 9Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; 10Department of Haematology, AZ Sint-Jan, Bruges, Belgium; 11The Sidney 12 13 14 15 Scan QR code Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA; Service des Maladies du Sang, Hôpital Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France; Médicine Interne, Institute Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Dipartimento di Biopatologia e Diagnostica per Immagini, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, CA, USA; via a barcode reader application. 16Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; 17Department of Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; 18Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; 19Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA; 20Acceleron Pharma, Cambridge, MA, USA; 21MDS Unit, Azienda This QR code will take you to an external site. Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU) Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy QR codes are valid for 120 days after the congress presentation date. Introduction • Baseline RBC transfusion burden subgroups for these analyses include: Figure 2. Achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks (A and B) and HI-E (C and D) Table 2. Dose escalations and time to dose escalation by RBC-TI response Table 3. Dose delays and reductions — ≤ 6 RBC units/8 weeks during Weeks 1–48 • Patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR MDS) develop anemia due to Luspatercept Luspatercept Luspatercept Parameter, n (%) Luspatercept (N = 153) a a 1,2 — > 6 RBC units/8 weeks Parameter responders non-responders overall ineffective erythropoiesis, leading to red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence A B ≥ 1 dose delay 74 (48.4) 100 (n = 69) (n = 84) (N = 153) • Luspatercept is a first-in-class erythroid maturation agent that binds to select Safety analysis Breakdown of the 69 luspatercept RBC-TI Due to pre-dose Hb levels ≥ 11.5 g/dL 13 (8.5) respondersa by baseline RBC transfusion burden 90 transforming growth factor-β superfamily ligands to diminish Smad2/3 signaling and • Data cutoff for incidence of dose reductions, dose delays, and TEAEs was July 1, 2019 No dose escalation, n (%) 24 (34.8) 11 (13.1) 35 (22.9) ≥ 1 dose reduction 9 (5.9) 3 enhance late-stage erythropoiesis 80 8.7% Dose escalation to 1.33 mg/kg, n (%) 45 (65.2) 73 (86.9) 118 (77.1) Due to Hb increase ≥ 2 g/dL vs pre-dose Hb level 3 (2.0) (n = 6) • MEDALIST is an ongoing phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Due to any suspected related grade ≥ 3 AE 5 (3.3) Results 70 Time to dose escalation to 1.33 mg/kg, 105 (40–419) 43 (39–258) 63 (39–419) evaluating the efficacy and safety of luspatercept in patients with LR MDS with ring 60 median (range), days Data cutoff: July 1, 2019. sideroblasts (RS) who require RBC transfusions Patients 45.1% AE, adverse event; Hb, hemoglobin. 50 (n = 69) Duration of treatment at 1.33 mg/kg, — The primary results of the MEDALIST trial demonstrated that a significant proportion of • 229 patients were randomized and received luspatercept (N = 153) or placebo (N = 76) 3.5 (1.2–17.5) 1.4 (0.7–8.3) 1.4 (0.7–17.5) median (range), months Figure 5. New onset of TEAEs at each dose level in patients receiving luspatercept-treated patients achieved RBC transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 8 weeks (Table 1) 40 4 30 In patients with baseline transfusion luspatercept during the first 24 weeks of the study — Baseline RBC transfusion burden was ≤ 6 RBC units/8 weeks in 108 of 153 (70.6%) 15.8% 91.3% 3.5 (1.2–17.5) 1.4 (0.7–8.3) 1.6 (0.7–17.5) (n = 63) burden ≤ 6 RBC units/8 weeks • Luspatercept has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the luspatercept patients and in 50 of 76 (65.8%) placebo patients 20 (n = 12) 30 1.0 mg/kg 1.33 mg/kg 1.75 mg/kg treatment of anemia in adult patients failing an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and Proportion of patients achieving In patients with baseline transfusion — Baseline RBC transfusion burden was > 6 RBC units/8 weeks in 45 of 153 (29.4%) RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks (Weeks 1–48) (%) 10 Baseline transfusion (N = 153) (N = 128) (N = 103) 2.9 (1.3–9.5) 1.4 (0.7–5.1) 1.4 (0.7–9.5) 25 requiring ≥ 2 RBC units over 8 weeks with Very low- to Intermediate-risk MDS with RS or luspatercept patients and in 26 of 76 (34.2%) placebo patients burden ≤ 6 RBC units/8 weeks burden > 6 RBC units/8 weeks 5 0 with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with RS and thrombocytosis Placebo Baseline transfusion Luspatercept Dose escalation to 1.75 mg/kg, n (%) 29 (42.0) 61 (72.6) 90 (58.8) 20 (N = 76) burden > 6 RBC units/8 weeks Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics (N = 153) 17.0% Time to dose escalation to 1.75 mg/kg, C D 14.4% Objective 171 (81–359) 91 (81–344) 106 (81–359) 15 13.6% 13.7% 13.7% Characteristic Luspatercept (N = 153) Placebo (N = 76) 100 Breakdown of the 90 luspatercept HI-E median (range), days 12.6% 13.1% 13.1% b responders by baseline RBC transfusion burden 10.9% 10.9% • To evaluate the effect of luspatercept dose on efficacy and treatment-emergent adverse Age, median (range), years 71 (40–95) 72 (26–91) 90 10.7% 10.5% 10.7% Duration of treatment at 1.75 mg/kg, 10 8.7% 9.2% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% events (TEAEs) 8.5 (0.7–17.5) 2.9 (0.7–19.5) 5.9 (0.7–19.5) patients Luspatercept 80 median (range), months 6.3% 6.3% Male, n (%) 94 (61.4) 50 (65.8) 5.5% 4.9% 4.9% 5 3.9% Methods RBC transfusion burden, median 70 58.8% 25.6% In patients with baseline transfusion TEAE (%) with new onset of indicated a 5 (1–15) 5 (2–20) 7.7 (0.7–17.2) 2.8 (0.7–19.5) 6.2 (0.7–19.5) (range), units/8 weeks (n = 90) (n = 23) burden ≤ 6 RBC units/8 weeks 60 0 Study design ≤ 6 units/8 weeks, n (%) 108 (70.6) 50 (65.8) In patients with baseline transfusion Fatigue Diarrhea Asthenia Dizziness Nausea Back pain Headache Dyspnea 50 13.8 (4.1–17.5) 4.2 (0.7–15.2) 4.3 (0.7–17.5) • MEDALIST is an ongoing phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial > 6 units/8 weeks, n (%) 45 (29.4) 26 (34.2) burden > 6 RBC units/8 weeks Data cutoff: July 1, 2019. 40 74.4% TEAEs include adverse events that started on or after the date of first dose and on or before 42 days after the date of last dose of study b (NCT02631070); patients in the luspatercept arm who have not discontinued from IPSS-R, n (%) (n = 67) Data cutoff: May 8, 2018. treatment. If a patient experienced multiple events under the same SOC and PT, then the patient is counted only once for that SOC and 30 17.1% a treatment continue to receive the study drug (Weeks 1–48) (%) Response was defined as achieving RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks during Weeks 1–48. PT level. All TEAEs regardless of severity are counted. Very low 18 (11.8) 6 (7.9) (n = 13) SOC, System Organ Class; PT, Preferred Term; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event. 20 RBC, red blood cell; TI, transfusion independence. • Patients were randomized at 65 sites between March 2016 and June 2017 Low 109 (71.2) 57 (75.0) 10 Baseline transfusion • The MEDALIST study design is shown in Figure 1 Intermediate 25 (16.3) 13 (17.1) Proportion of patients achieving HI-E burden ≤ 6 RBC units/8 weeks Figure 4. First RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks (A) and HI-E response (B) during Weeks 1–48 — Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive luspatercept (starting dose 1.0 mg/kg) or c 0 SF3B1 mutation, n (%) 138 (93.2) 64 (86.5) Luspatercept Placebo Baseline transfusion by dose level in patients receiving luspatercept Conclusions placebo subcutaneously every 21 days for ≥ 24 weeks Serum EPO, n (%)d (N = 153) (N = 76) burden > 6 RBC units/8 weeks — Dose titration was allowed up to 1.33 mg/kg and then up to 1.75 mg/kg in the A • The majority of luspatercept patients with baseline transfusion burden 6 RBC < 200 U/L 88 (57.5) 50 (65.8) Data cutoff: May 8, 2018.
Recommended publications
  • Kopi Af Aktivlisten 2021-06-30 Ny.Xlsm
    Velliv noterede aktier i alt pr. 30-06-2021 ISIN Udstedelsesland Navn Markedsværdi (i DKK) US0378331005 US APPLE INC 1.677.392.695 US5949181045 US MICROSOFT CORP 1.463.792.732 US0231351067 US AMAZON.COM INC 1.383.643.996 DK0060534915 DK NOVO NORDISK A/S-B 1.195.448.146 US30303M1027 US FACEBOOK INC-CLASS A 1.169.094.867 US02079K3059 US ALPHABET INC-CL A 867.740.769 DK0010274414 DK DANSKE BANK A/S 761.684.457 DK0060079531 DK DSV PANALPINA A/S 629.313.827 US02079K1079 US ALPHABET INC-CL C 589.305.120 US90138F1021 US TWILIO INC - A 514.807.852 US57636Q1040 US MASTERCARD INC - A 490.766.560 US4781601046 US JOHNSON & JOHNSON 478.682.981 US70450Y1038 US PAYPAL HOLDINGS INC 471.592.728 DK0061539921 DK VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S 441.187.698 US79466L3024 US SALESFORCE.COM INC 439.114.061 US01609W1027 US ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING-SP ADR 432.325.255 US8835561023 US THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 430.036.612 US22788C1053 US CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC - A 400.408.622 KYG875721634 HK TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 397.054.685 KR7005930003 KR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 389.413.700 DK0060094928 DK ORSTED A/S 378.578.374 ES0109067019 ES AMADEUS IT GROUP SA 375.824.429 US46625H1005 US JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 375.282.618 US67066G1040 US NVIDIA CORP 357.034.119 US17275R1023 US CISCO SYSTEMS INC 348.160.692 DK0010244508 DK AP MOLLER-MAERSK A/S-B 339.783.859 US20030N1019 US COMCAST CORP-CLASS A 337.806.502 NL0010273215 NL ASML HOLDING NV 334.040.559 CH0012032048 CH ROCHE HOLDING AG-GENUSSCHEIN 325.008.200 KYG970081173 HK WUXI BIOLOGICS CAYMAN INC 321.300.236 US4370761029 US HOME DEPOT INC 317.083.124 US58933Y1055 US MERCK & CO.
    [Show full text]
  • EP Vantage Interview - Silence Hoping to Have Something to Shout About in 2009
    December 22, 2008 EP Vantage Interview - Silence hoping to have something to shout about in 2009 Lisa Urquhart With its first product expected to go into the clinic potentially as early as January, Silence Therapeutics is hoping that 2009 will be year it has something to shout about and one that will reverse the alarming share price decline that has seen the company’s valuation slip from a high of over £170m in June 2007 to £21.6m today. Silence is one of a growing number of companies working in RNA interference (RNAi) and particularly short interfering RNA (siRNA), which work by selectively silencing or inactivating genes related to certain diseases. It is importantly one of only two companies that have composition of matter patent protection for their siRNA drugs. Speaking to EP Vantage, Iain Ross, chief executive of Silence, says: “It’s a big year coming up for us.” The group has spent most of the last 12 months strengthening its IP position, and next year comes the important move of the group’s lead candidate Atu027 into the clinic, an event Mr Ross says should take place in the first quarter of the year. Many expect it could be as soon as the end of January. Partnering focus What is less expected is the speed at which Mr Ross intends to partner the drug, which is being developed in solid tumours, with an emphasis on lung cancer. “We would be looking at doing something either at the end of 2009 or the beginning of 2010,” he says. Key to partnering discussions will be the drug demonstrating good safety data in a number of cancer patients, which could be the catalyst to starting talks with big pharma who have already started to ask about Atu027.
    [Show full text]
  • IQVIA Pharma Deals Half-Year Review of 2020
    White Paper IQVIA Pharma Deals Half-Year Review of 2020 HEATHER CARTWRIGHT, Senior Analyst, Global Market Insights, IQVIA MICHELLE LIU, Analyst, Global Market Insights, IQVIA TASKIN AHMED, Manager, Global Market Insights, IQVIA Table of contents Introduction 1 Uncertainty and prudence cause M&A to stall 2 Licensing deal values continue to rise 5 Roche pips AstraZeneca to title of most active dealmaker 10 COVID-19 pandemic drives increase in R&D collaboration 11 Infectious diseases replace oncology as top therapeutic area for dealmaking 14 Outlook for H2 2020 15 About the authors 17 Introduction COVID-19 shakes up the dealmaking landscape H1 2020 was an unprecedented time for dealmaking in the life sciences sector. While the COVID-19 pandemic rapidly provoked a significant level of partnering activity amongst biopharma companies keen to expedite the development of vaccines or therapeutics to tackle the virus, it also acted as a brake on other types of dealmaking, most notably M&A which saw a sharp decline in activity as a result of uncertainty and operational disruption. Indeed, H1 2020 was notable for the absence of any US$5 B deals on the scale seen in previous years as companies instead focused their attentions on internal programs and potential COVID-19 solutions, opting only for a few asset-driven acquisitions. There was also plentiful capital available to allow biotech companies to stay independent, particularly those in the US. As a result, aggregate spending on M&A by life science companies plummeted to just US$19.1 B in the first 6 months of 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Equity Fund Description Plan 3S DCP & JRA MICROSOFT CORP
    Global Equity Fund June 30, 2020 Note: Numbers may not always add up due to rounding. % Invested For Each Plan Description Plan 3s DCP & JRA MICROSOFT CORP 2.5289% 2.5289% APPLE INC 2.4756% 2.4756% AMAZON COM INC 1.9411% 1.9411% FACEBOOK CLASS A INC 0.9048% 0.9048% ALPHABET INC CLASS A 0.7033% 0.7033% ALPHABET INC CLASS C 0.6978% 0.6978% ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING ADR REPRESEN 0.6724% 0.6724% JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.6151% 0.6151% TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 0.6124% 0.6124% BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 0.5765% 0.5765% NESTLE SA 0.5428% 0.5428% VISA INC CLASS A 0.5408% 0.5408% PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.4838% 0.4838% JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.4730% 0.4730% UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.4619% 0.4619% ISHARES RUSSELL 3000 ETF 0.4525% 0.4525% HOME DEPOT INC 0.4463% 0.4463% TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 0.4337% 0.4337% MASTERCARD INC CLASS A 0.4325% 0.4325% INTEL CORPORATION CORP 0.4207% 0.4207% SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT FUND 0.4158% 0.4158% ROCHE HOLDING PAR AG 0.4017% 0.4017% VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 0.3792% 0.3792% NVIDIA CORP 0.3721% 0.3721% AT&T INC 0.3583% 0.3583% SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 0.3483% 0.3483% ADOBE INC 0.3473% 0.3473% PAYPAL HOLDINGS INC 0.3395% 0.3395% WALT DISNEY 0.3342% 0.3342% CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.3283% 0.3283% MERCK & CO INC 0.3242% 0.3242% NETFLIX INC 0.3213% 0.3213% EXXON MOBIL CORP 0.3138% 0.3138% NOVARTIS AG 0.3084% 0.3084% BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.3046% 0.3046% PEPSICO INC 0.3036% 0.3036% PFIZER INC 0.3020% 0.3020% COMCAST CORP CLASS A 0.2929% 0.2929% COCA-COLA 0.2872% 0.2872% ABBVIE INC 0.2870% 0.2870% CHEVRON CORP 0.2767% 0.2767% WALMART INC 0.2767%
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction in the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
    Reduction in the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events with Apabetalone, a BET Protein Inhibitor, in Patients with Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes According to Insulin Treatment: Analysis of the BETonMACE Trial Gregory G. Schwartz1, Stephen J. Nicholls2, Henry N. Ginsberg3, Jan O. Johansson4, Kamyar Kalantar‐Zadeh5, Ewelina Kulikowski4, Peter P Toth6, Norman Wong4, Michael Sweeney4, Kausik K Ray7 On behalf of the BETonMACE Investigators 1Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO USA; 2Monash University Cardiovascular Research Center, Melbourne, Australia; 3Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY USA; 4Resverlogix Corp., Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 5University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA USA; 6CGH Medical Center, Sterling, IL and Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA; 7Imperial College Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, London UK American Heart Association – 2020 Scientific Sessions November 2020 ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02586155 Disclosures • The BETonMACE trial was funded by Resverlogix • Dr Schwartz reports research grants to the University of Colorado from Resverlogix, Sanofi, The Medicines Company, and Roche; and is coinventor of pending US patent 14/657192 (“Methods of Reducing Cardiovascular Risk”) assigned in full to the University of Colorado. • Dr. Nicholls reports grants from Resverlogix, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking the Potential of Gene Silencing for Everyone
    Corporate Presentation JP Morgan Conference January 2018 Forward looking statements The information contained in this presentation is being supplied and communicated to you on a Securities in the Company have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States confidential basis solely for your information and may not be reproduced, further distributed to Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or qualified for sale under the law of any other person or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose. In accordance with the any state or other jurisdiction of the United States of America and may not be offered or sold in prohibition on market abuse contained in Part VIII of the Financial Services and Markets Act the United States of America except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not 2000 (as amended) (the “Act”): (i) you must not pass this information to any person; and (ii) subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act. Neither the United States you must not base any behaviour in relation to any securities or other Qualifying Investments Securities and Exchange Commission nor any securities regulatory body of any state or other (as that term is defined in the Act) which would amount to market abuse on such information jurisdiction of the United States of America, nor any securities regulatory body of any other until after it is made generally available. country or political subdivision thereof, has approved or disapproved of this presentation or the securities discussed herein or passed on the accuracy or adequacy of the contents of this This presentation is being communicated in the United Kingdom only to (a) persons who have presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • GSK's Big Reveal
    3 August 2018 No. 3916 Scripscrip.pharmaintelligence.informa.com Pharma intelligence | informa at Genentech Inc. (Also see “GSK Bags Bar- ron As R&D Boss As Vallance Joins UK Govern- ment” - Scrip, 8 Nov, 2017.) With a budding early immuno-oncology pipeline, Walmsley clearly has her eye on establishing GSK as an important player in the space. The event in London was Barron’s first op- portunity to present his R&D strategy and coincided with the company’s second quar- ter sales and earnings release. “This is an ideal time to be thinking about reinventing R&D, because we are doing well. We are growing,” Barron said. PILLARS FOR INNOVATION Investors have been eager to hear from the R&D legend, but with few near-term catalysts or big changes to the late-stage pipeline, they may be underwhelmed by the update. Barron, meanwhile, is focused on deliver- GSK’s Big Reveal: ing scientific and cultural changes that will yield breakthroughs over the long-term. An R&D Overhaul Poised To Yield He talked about a time horizon of 2021 to 2026, and he talked more high-level, rather than specifics, about incentives needed to Long-Term Cultural Change drive innovation, the technologies that can JESSICA MERRILL [email protected] help improve clinical trial success, and cul- tural changes. He said science, technology laxoSmithKline PLC CEO Emma pharma R&D – is that investors will need to and culture are the three pillars needed to Walmsley may have spelled out the be patient to see GSK deliver on its promise drive innovation, and all three must be in Gbig pharma’s R&D turnaround plan of innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Meeting Education Committee All Relationships Are Considered Compensated
    2019 Annual Meeting Education Committee All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless otherwise noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution Patents, Royalties, Travel, Stock and Other Expert Name Employment Leadership Honoraria Consulting or Advisory Role Speakers' Bureau Research Funding Other Intellectual Accommodations, Other Ownership Interests Testimony Property Expenses Monica M. Abbvie (Inst), Agenus (Inst), Astellas Bertagnolli Pharma (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Baxalta (Inst), Bayer Health (Inst), Breast Cancer Research Foundation (Inst), Bristol- Myers Squibb (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Complion (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), Genentech (Inst), GHI Pharma (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Leidos (Inst), Lexicon (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Matrex (Inst), Mayo Clinic (Inst), Merck (Inst), MGH (Inst), Millenium Pharamceuticals (Inst), Novartis (Inst), PCORI (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Inst), Sagerock Advisors (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Taiho Oncology (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Teva (Inst) Tatiana M. Prowell David R. Spigel AstraZeneca (Inst), Boehringer AstraZeneca (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Bristol-Myers Ingelheim (Inst), Bristol-Myers Squibb Squibb (Inst), Celgene (Inst), (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Genentech/Roche Genentech/Roche (Inst), (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Merck (Inst), Novartis Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst) (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), University
    [Show full text]
  • SILENCE THERAPEUTICS PLC (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2021 Registration No. 333-248203 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form F-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 SILENCE THERAPEUTICS PLC (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Not Applicable (Translation of Registrant’s Name into English) England and Wales 2834 Not Applicable (State or other Jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Classification Code Number) Identification Number) 72 Hammersmith Road London W14 8TH United Kingdom Tel: +44 20 3457 6900 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices) Silence Therapeutics Inc. 434 West 33rd Street, Office 814 New York, New York 10001 Tel: +1 917 374 0372 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) Copies of all communications, including communications sent to agent for service, should be sent to: Joshua A. Kaufman Claire A. Keast-Butler Divakar Gupta Cooley (UK) LLP Brian F. Leaf Dashwood Cooley LLP 69 Old Broad Street 55 Hudson Yards London EC2M 1QS New York, New York 10001 United Kingdom +1 212 479—6000 +44 20 7785 9355 Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.
    [Show full text]
  • Silence Therapeutics
    THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt about the contents of this document and the action you should take, you are recommended immediately to seek your own advice from a person duly authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended) who specialises in advising on the acquisition of shares and other securities. If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your Ordinary Shares in Silence Therapeutic s plc or prior to 15 December 2009 a sale or transfer is effected, please send this document, together with the Form of Proxy, to the purchaser or transferee or to the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected. This document constitutes an admission document drawn up in accordance with the AIM Rules for Companies and does not comprise a prospectus prepared in accordance with the Prospectus Rules of the UK Listing Authority made under section 73A of FSMA, and it has not been, and will not be, approved or filed with the Financial Services Authority under the Prospectus Rules. The Directors and the Proposed Directors , whose names appear on page 3 of this document, accept individual and collective responsibility for the information contained in this document including individual and collective responsibility for compliance with the AIM Rules. To the best of the knowledge of the Directors and the Proposed Directors (who have taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case), the information contained in this document is in accordance with the facts and contains no omission likely to affect the import of such information.
    [Show full text]
  • Audrey's Life Science Meeting Picks for December-January 2011
    Audrey’s Life Science Meeting Picks for December-January 2011 Complimentary Service of AudreysNetwork.com (Dec. 5, 2011 Edition) ******************************************************************************* BioCentury TV Today, See the Webcast Sunday, Dec. 4, 2011 www.biocenturytv.com, Continuously available starting at 9:00 a.m. EDT Topic: “The Doctor in the House” Editor Steve Usdin is joined by Michael Burgess, Republican Congressional Representative from Texas Date: Sunday, Dec. 4, 2011 Watch the Broadcast Watch on the Web 8:30 - 9:00 a.m. EDT www.biocenturytv.com WUSA Channel 9 Continuously available in Washington, D.C. starting at 9:00 a.m. Topic Description Representative Michael Burgess was an obstetrician for 25 years before being sent to Congress from Texas. Now vice-chair of the House subcommittee on health, he will be among the first lawmakers put his stamp on the must-pass user fee legislation for drugs and devices in 2012. On Sunday, December 4, BioCentury This Week Washington Editor Steve Usdin and Rep. Burgess discuss why the conservative Texas Republican doesn't see eye to eye with the White House on healthcare reform, why he wants to limit FDA's oversight of lab-developed tests, and his efforts to relax financial conflict of interest restrictions on the agency's advisory committee members. ************************************************ Bio2Device Group, Tuesday Morning, Dec. 6, 2011 Topic: Title: "What's So Complicated About Medical Customer Support? - Views From Behind the Curtains" Panelists: John Jensen, Ron Bucher, Stacy Williams Date and Time: Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2011, 8:30- 10:30 am Location: Sunnyvale City Council Chambers, 456 W. Olive, Sunnyvale, CA (across the street from Sunnyvale Public Library) Cost: Free Park in Street and in NOVA and library parking lots across the street.
    [Show full text]
  • DDT Cover/Back April 2006.Qx
    April 2008 Vol 8 No 4 www.drugdeliverytech.com IN THIS ISSUE INTERVIEW WITH PHARMAFORM’S VP, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MICHAEL CROWLEY, PhD MBO Financing 28 Derek G. Hennecke, MBA Injectable Packaging 40 Frances L. DeGrazio Partnering With dermaCM 56 Robert L. Dowdell FEATURING CRO Strategies 60 Cindy H. Dubin Late-Stage The science & business of specialty pharma, biotechnology, and drug delivery Development 68 Robert Zerbe, MD Bhupendra Christine M. Stuart Madden, Prajapati, Ford, MBA Challenges in MPharm Investment Trends PhD Driving Combination Which Way to 78 The Upcoming Era China Product Drug Approval? Ames Gross of Nanomedicine: A Development Briefing April 2008 Vol 8 No 4 PUBLISHER/PRESIDENT Ralph Vitaro EXECUTIVE EDITORIAL DIRECTOR Dan Marino, MSc [email protected] CREATIVE DIRECTOR Shalamar Q. Eagel CONTROLLER Debbie Carrillo CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Cindy H. Dubin Debra Bingham Jason McKinnie Malcolm A. Teasdale TECHNICAL OPERATIONS Mark Newland EDITORIAL SUPPORT Nicholas D. Vitaro ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT Kathleen Kenny Corporate/Editorial Office 219 Changebridge Road, Montville, NJ 07045 Tel: (973)299-1200 Fax: (973) 299-7937 www.drugdeliverytech.com Advertising Sales Offices East & Midwest Victoria Geis - Account Executive Cheryl S. Stratos - Account Executive 103 Oronoco Street, Suite 200 Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel: (703) 212-7735 Fax: (703) 548-3733 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] West Coast Warren De Graff Western Regional Manager The bi-weekly electronic newsletter from the publishers of Drug 818 5th Avenue, Suite 301 San Rafael, CA 94901 Delivery Technology and Specialty Pharma will provide over 12,000 Tel: (415) 721-0644 Fax: (415) 721-0665 subscribers with the latest news of business deals, alliances, and E-mail: [email protected] technology breakthroughs from the pharmaceutical, specialty International Ralph Vitaro pharmaceutical, drug delivery, and biotechnology industries.
    [Show full text]