Late Pleistocene Pronghorn, Antilocapra Americana, from Natural Trap Cave, Wyoming

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Late Pleistocene Pronghorn, Antilocapra Americana, from Natural Trap Cave, Wyoming University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 1988 Late Pleistocene Pronghorn, Antilocapra Americana, from Natural Trap Cave, Wyoming John Chorn University of Kansas Main Campus Barbara A. Frase Bradley University Carl D. Frailey Midland College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas Part of the Life Sciences Commons Chorn, John; Frase, Barbara A.; and Frailey, Carl D., "Late Pleistocene Pronghorn, Antilocapra Americana, from Natural Trap Cave, Wyoming" (1988). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. 177. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/177 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Academy of Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societiesy b an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 1988. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, XVI: 127-139. LATE PLEISTOCENE PRONGHORN, ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA, FROM NATURAL TRAP CAVE, WYOMING John Chorn1, Barbara A. Frase2, and Carl D. Frailey 3 lMuseum of Natural History University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 66045 2Department of Biology Bradley University Peoria, Illinois 61625 3Midland College Midland, Texas 79705 Natural Trap Cave, Wyoming, has yielded one of the more reliable records of Because horn cores and postcranial material are rare, it is Antilocapra from the Late Pleistocene of North America. Generic assignment is important to discuss in some detail A. americana in north­ based on horn cores from two individuals, with a minimum of 13 individuals central Wyoming during the Late Pleistocene. represented by other elements. Morphometric analysis of postcranial material indicates that this form is indistinguishable from the living A. americana. Fossils were recovered from a stratum dated at 17,000-20,000 yr BP. Presence of Antilocapra at other sites is probably over-reported. Secure records based on horn cores are known from only two other sites. Antilocapra americana may have been the preferred prey of the American cheetah, Miracinonyx trumani. Teeth, horn cores, and much of the postcranial skeleton of the Natural Trap LIVING PRONGHORN pronghorn are figured. The American pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) is the t t t only extant member of the genus. It is widely distributed throughout the western United States, and extends into Mexico INTRODUCTION and Canada (O'Gara, 1978). This artiodactyl is not a true ante­ lope, but represents a distinct family, the Antilocapridae, which Natural Trap Cave, on the northwestern flank of the Big Horn is closely allied with the Bovidae (e.g., Simpson, 1945). Males Mountains, north-central Wyoming, has been a deadfall animal may average up to 57 kg, depending on the subspecies (Mit­ trap since the Sangamonian Interglacial. It is located at an chell, 1971; O'Gara, 1978), and have paired horns with an elevation of 1500 + m. General discussions of the site can be anterior prong; females are smaller and may lack horns alto­ found in Gilbert and Martin (1984) and Martin and Gilbert gether. Pronghorns are the fleetest North American mammal (1978). and can attain speeds of about 65 km per hour (Kurten and Anderson, 1980: 325); they are gracile and highly adapted to Natural Trap Cave contains the best-documented Pleistocene their cursorial existence. Cheek teeth are exceptionally high­ record of Antilocapra americana. Although the American crowned and enable these animals to eat grit-covered and sili­ pronghorn was abundant and wide-ranging in historic times, its ceous forage. Grasses, forbs, and shrubs are included in the diet; Pleistocene record is surprisingly meager (Fig. 1, Table I). Much the importance of grazing versus browsing is dependent on of this record is based on isolated teeth, which closely resemble the season and locality (O'Gara, 1978). Their habitat includes those of other antilocaprid genera. At the generic level, horn short-grass prairie, open shrubland, and mountain parks (Arm­ cores are the most useful element for positive identification. strong, 1972). 127 128 Pleistocene Pronghorns 29 23 o 300 • ~ I~O" 360 KILOMETERS FIGURE 1. Map showing Wisconsinan (100,000-10,000 BP) localities from which Antilocapra has been at least tentatively reported. Not shown are the Riddell Site, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; Jimenez Cave, Chihuahua, Mexico and Tlapacoya, Central Mexico. I-Vulture Cave, 2-Emery Barrow Pit, 3-Maricopa, 4-McKittrick, S-Rancho La Brea, 6-Chimney Rock Animal Trap, 7-Dutton, 8-Lindenmeier, 9-Jaguar Cave, to-Owl Cave (Wasden), ll-Red Willow, 12-Dry Cave, 13-Isleta Caves, 14-Muskox Cave, IS-Council Hall Cave, 16-Mineral Hill Cave, 17-Smith Creek Cave, 18-Fossil Lake, 19-Kyle Quarry, 20-Ben Franklin Local Fauna, 21-Williams Cave, 22-Silver Creek Local Fauna, 23-Agate Basin area, 24-Bell Cave, 2S-Colby Mammoth Kill, 26-Horned Owl Cave, 27-Laramie & North Platte River Gravel Terraces, 28-Little Box Elder Cave, 29-Natural Trap Cave, 30-Prospects Shelter, 31-Medicine Hat Faunas. TABLE I. Published Records of Antilocapra americana from the Wisconsin (100,000-10,000 years BP). Locality Age Taxon Material Vulture Cave, AZ 14,000 BP A. americana 1 metacarpal, lacking distal articular (Mead & Philips, 1981) surface Emery Barrow Pit, CA Rancholabrean A. americana (Kurten & Anderson, 1980) Maricopa, CA Wisconsin A. americana (Kurten & Anderson, 1980) McKittrick, CA Wisconsin: A. cf. americana 2 horn cores, 2 mandibular rami (Furlong, 1932; Schultz, 1938) 38,000 ± 2.500 BP (Furlong, 1932) (1 adult, 1 juvenile) A. americana (Schultz, 1938) Rancho La Brea, CA Wisconsin (some Recent): A. cf. americana partial skull with nearly complete (Furlong, 1932; Reynolds, 1976) 12,650 ± 160-19,300 ± 395 BP (Furlong, 1932) horn core (Pit 3); 25,000-40,000 BP (Pit 91) cf. A. americana 5 specimens from 3 individuals (Reynolds, 1976) TABLE I-{Continued on page 129) Pleistocene Pronghorns 129 TABLE I-{Continuedfrom page 128) Chimney Rock Animal Trap, CO Late Pleistocene & Recent: A. americana ? (Hager, 1972) 11,980 ± 180 BP (at the 48 inch level) Dutton, CO Found below mammoth bone Antilocapra sp. 1 incomplete M, (Graham, 1981) dated 11,710 ± 150 BP Lindenmeier, CO Wisconsin: A. americana 1 vertebra, 1 radius, 1 carpus, (Wilmsen & Roberts, 1978) 11,000 BP 1 phalanx, 3 tarsals & 3 teeth (minimum of 2 individuals) Jaguar Cave, 10 Wisconsin & Recent: A. americana (Kurten & Ao.derson, 1972; 10,370 ± 350 BP (hearth Sadek-Kooras, 1966) 11,580 ± 250 BP (hearth) Owl Cave (Wasden), ID Wisconsin & Recent: A. cf. americana (Guilday, 1969; Miller & Dort, 1978) 8,000 BP (Bison bone); 12,500 BP (Mammoth bone); Red Willow, NE Late Pleistocene & Recent. A. americana distal half of humerus, fragment of (Corner, 1977) lower jaw with P4 , C,-PJ , 1 metatarsal, 1 tibia, distal end of metacarpal Dry Cave, NM Late Wisconsin. cf. Antilocapra (Harris, 1970) 14,4 70-250 BP (part of site) pronghorn? from dated part of site. Minimum of 1 individual from undated parts of site. Isleta Caves, NM Pleistocene & Recent: A. americana (Harris & Findley, 1964) Pleistocene age based on presence of extinct faunal elements that are presumed to have been confined temporally to the Pleistocene (Arctodus, Camelops, Tanupolama). Muskox Cave, NM Sangamon to Recent: cf. A, americana ? (Logan, 1981) 25,000 ± 1,100-18,140 ± 200 BP Council Hall Cave, NV 23,900 ± 970 & 13,040 ± 190 BP A. americana ? (S, I Miller, 1979; Harris, 1985) Mineral Hill Cave, NV Late Pleistocene-Recent Antilocapra ? (McGuire, 1980) Smith Creek Cave, NV Late or Middle Wisconsin: A. americana (Mead, et ai" 1982; ~12,000 BP S. I Miller, 1979) Fossil Lake, OR Wisconsin" A. cf. americana 3 astragali, distal end of humerus, (Elftman, 1931; Allison, 1966) proximal part of ulna, acetabular region of pelvis, I tooth IJ , or C, Kyle Quarry, TN Rancholabrean. A. americana (Kurten & Anderson, 1980) Ben Franklin Local Fauna, TX Late Wisconsin & Recent: ? A. americana 1 incomplete MJ (Slaughter & Hoover, 1963) 9,550 ± 375 BP (hearth); 11,135 ± 450 BP (mussel shell) Williams Cave, TX Pleistocene mixed with Recent: A. a. americana articulated vertebral column, occipital (Ayer, 1936; Harris, 1985) 11,140 ± 320& 12,100 ± 210 region of skull, left innominate, dates on sloth dung. fragment of sacrum, distal metapodial, proximal fragment of right radius, fragmentary right maxilla with PM"] Silver Creek Local Fauna, UT >40,000 BP: A. cf. americana p. (and medial phalanx which is (W E. Miller, 1976) Late Sangamon or Early indistinguishable from cervid) Wisconsin Agate Basin area, WY Latest Wisconsin A. americana (Walker, 1982; Frison, 1982) dates> 10,000 BP; Clovis faunule proximal left metatarsal 10,030 ± 280 BP; Hell Gap faunule 1 astragal us, 3 carpals 10,445 ± 110 BP; 7Folsom faunule numerous elements including 10,780 ± 120BP teeth (horn cores not present) TABLE I-{Continued on page 130) 130 Pleistocene Pronghorns TABLE I-{Continuedjrompage 129) Bell Cave, WY Pleistocene & Recent A. americana (Zeimens & Walker, 1974) same as above - (Martes nobilis, Equus, Camelops) Colby Mammoth Kill, WY Wisconsin: A. americana I ulna lacking proximal & distal ends (Walker & Frison, 1980) 11,200 ± 200 BP Horned Owl Cave, WY Wisconsin & Recent, A. americana I phalanx from ft, #4, I phalanx from (Guilday, Hamilton & Adams, 1967) ft, #5 Laramie & North Platte River Late Pleistocene A. americana Gravel Terraces, WY (Walker, 1982) Little Box Elder Cave, WY Late Pleistocene & Recent A. americana (Anderson, 1968) Natural Trap Cave, WY Wisconsin & Recent (some A. americana dissociated skeletons, partial skulls, (Martin & Gilbert, 1978) older unpublished material): horn cores for minimum of 2 17 ,620-20,170 BP for "Gley" individuals soil leveL Prospects Shelter, WY ca, 17,500 BP Antilocapra sp. (Chomko & Gilbert, 1987) Medicine Hat Faunas, Canada Late mid-Wisconsin & Early ?A. cf. americana (2 sites) mid-Wisconsin: (Harington, 1978) 37,900 ± 1,100BP& 38,700 ± 1,100 BP from above fauna, Riddell Site, Canada Late Rancholabrean, Antilocapra cf.
Recommended publications
  • MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION of a MEXICAN ONZA SPECIMEN AS a PUMA (PUMA CONCOLOR) in the Americas, There Are Two Documented
    Cryptozoology, 12, 1993-1996, 42-49 © 1996 International Society of Cryptozoology MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION OF A MEXICAN ONZA SPECIMEN AS A PUMA (PUMA CONCOLOR) PE tit A. DRATCH Laboratory of Viral Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Building 560/Room 21-105, Frederick, Maryland 21702, U.S.A. and National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory Ashland, Oregon 96520, U.S.A. WENDY RosLuND National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory Ashland, Oregon 96520, U.S.A. JANICE S. MARTENSON, MELANIE CULVER, AND STEPHEN J. O'BRIEN' Laboratory of Viral Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Building 560/Room 21-105, Frederick, Maryland 21702, U.S.A. ABSTRACT: Tissue samples from an alleged Mexican Onza, shot in the western Sierra Madre in 1986, were subjected to several biochemical assays in an attempt to determine the specimen's relationship to felid species of North America. Protein analyses included isoenzyme electrophoresis and albumin isoelectric focusing. Mi- tochondrial DNA was assayed for restriction fragment lengths with 28 restriction enzymes, and the NÐ5 gene was sequenced. The resulting protein and rnitochondrial DNA characteristics of the Onza were indistinguishable from those of North Amer- ican pumas. INTRODUCTION In the Americas, there are two documented species of large cats: 1) Puma concolor, the puma, also called mountain lion, cougar, and panther in dif- ferent regions of North America, and known as leon in Mexico; and 2) Panthera onca, the jaguar, or tigre as it is known south of the U.S. border. To whom correspondence should be addressed. 42 DRATCH ET AL.: ONZA MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION 43 Flo.
    [Show full text]
  • Mizzoualumnus1975novp16-19.Pdf (3.318Mb)
    THE GAUE THAT TRAPPED HISTORY Natural Trap Cave has been collecting bones of unwary animals for at least 13,000 years. Expeditions led by a Mizzou anthropologist are digging up those bones and clues about the cycles of climatic change. Text and Photos by Dave Holman IIi / m ISSOllRI ilLUrnrus The only entrenee to Natural Trap Ceve la the hole In the roof. Any enlmal that might have survived the fallatlll became a victim. Workera at theahe, below, ehherrappellnto theeave or descend theacafloldlng. A herd of small horses stampeded through the tall grass across a plateau near the edge of a canyon, pur­ sued by a large, long-legged cat. The cat closed on the slowest horse, forcing her along the canyon edge onto a peninsula of limestone. The cat sprang, fas­ tened its claws and teeth in the horse's neck, and suddenly, horse and cat disappeared from the face of the earth. Twelve thousand years later, a green panel truck and a dusty jeep bounced along a dirt road over the same plateau, now covered with sage and prickly pear. On the limestone peninsula where the horse and cat disappeared, the vehicles stopped by a 15- foot-wide hole in the rock. Eighty feet below is the floor of Natural Trap Cave. The cave floor is covered with the accumulated dust of centuries, clearly stratified and containing thou­ sands of bones of animals that failed to see the hole. This summer was the second consecutive year that Bob Gilbert, research associate in Mizzou's an­ thropology department had led an organized ex­ pedition to the trap.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide the jill and lewis bernard family Hall of north american mammals inside: • Suggestions to Help You come prepared • essential questions for Student Inquiry • Strategies for teaching in the exhibition • map of the Exhibition • online resources for the Classroom • Correlations to science framework • glossary amnh.org/namammals Essential QUESTIONS Who are — and who were — the North as tundra, winters are cold, long, and dark, the growing season American Mammals? is extremely short, and precipitation is low. In contrast, the abundant precipitation and year-round warmth of tropical All mammals on Earth share a common ancestor and and subtropical forests provide optimal growing conditions represent many millions of years of evolution. Most of those that support the greatest diversity of species worldwide. in this hall arose as distinct species in the relatively recent Florida and Mexico contain some subtropical forest. In the past. Their ancestors reached North America at different boreal forest that covers a huge expanse of the continent’s times. Some entered from the north along the Bering land northern latitudes, winters are dry and severe, summers moist bridge, which was intermittently exposed by low sea levels and short, and temperatures between the two range widely. during the Pleistocene (2,588,000 to 11,700 years ago). Desert and scrublands are dry and generally warm through- These migrants included relatives of New World cats (e.g. out the year, with temperatures that may exceed 100°F and dip sabertooth, jaguar), certain rodents, musk ox, at least two by 30 degrees at night. kinds of elephants (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskox Management Report Alaska Dept of Fish and Game Wildlife
    Muskox Management Report of survey-inventory activities 1 July 1998–30 June 2000 Mary V. Hicks, Editor Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation December 2001 ADF&G Please note that population and harvest data in this report are estimates and may be refined at a later date. If this report is used in its entirety, please reference as: Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 2001. Muskox management report of survey-inventory activities 1 July 1998–30 June 2000. M.V. Hicks, editor. Juneau, Alaska. If used in part, the reference would include the author’s name, unit number, and page numbers. Authors’ names can be found at the end of each unit section. Funded in part through Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, Proj. 16, Grants W-27-2 and W-27-3. LOCATION 2 GAME MANAGEMENT UNIT: 18 (41,159 mi ) GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION: Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta BACKGROUND NUNIVAK ISLAND Muskoxen were once widely distributed in northern and western Alaska but were extirpated by the middle or late 1800s. In 1929, with the support of the Alaska Territorial Legislature, the US Congress initiated a program to reintroduce muskoxen in Alaska. Thirty-one muskoxen were introduced from Greenland to Nunivak Island in Unit 18 during 1935–1936, as a first step toward reintroducing this species to Alaska. The Nunivak Island population grew slowly until approximately 1958 and then began a period of rapid growth. The first hunting season was opened in 1975, and the population has since fluctuated between 400 and 750 animals, exhibiting considerable reproductive potential, even under heavy harvest regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Horned Animals
    Horned Animals In This Issue In this issue of Wild Wonders you will discover the differences between horns and antlers, learn about the different animals in Alaska who have horns, compare and contrast their adaptations, and discover how humans use horns to make useful and decorative items. Horns and antlers are available from local ADF&G offices or the ARLIS library for teachers to borrow. Learn more online at: alaska.gov/go/HVNC Contents Horns or Antlers! What’s the Difference? 2 Traditional Uses of Horns 3 Bison and Muskoxen 4-5 Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats 6-7 Test Your Knowledge 8 Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation, 2018 Issue 8 1 Sometimes people use the terms horns and antlers in the wrong manner. They may say “moose horns” when they mean moose antlers! “What’s the difference?” they may ask. Let’s take a closer look and find out how antlers and horns are different from each other. After you read the information below, try to match the animals with the correct description. Horns Antlers • Made out of bone and covered with a • Made out of bone. keratin layer (the same material as our • Grow and fall off every year. fingernails and hair). • Are grown only by male members of the • Are permanent - they do not fall off every Cervid family (hoofed animals such as year like antlers do. deer), except for female caribou who also • Both male and female members in the grow antlers! Bovid family (cloven-hoofed animals such • Usually branched.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalia: Carnivora) in the Americas: Past to Present
    Journal of Mammalian Evolution https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-020-09496-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Environmental Drivers and Distribution Patterns of Carnivoran Assemblages (Mammalia: Carnivora) in the Americas: Past to Present Andrés Arias-Alzate1,2 & José F. González-Maya3 & Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales4 & Rodrigo A. Medellín5 & Enrique Martínez-Meyer2 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Understanding species distributions and the variation of assemblage structure in time and space are fundamental goals of biogeography and ecology. Here, we use an ecological niche modeling and macroecological approach in order to assess whether constraints patterns in carnivoran richness and composition structures in replicated assemblages through time and space should reflect environmental filtering through ecological niche constraints from the Last Inter-glacial (LIG), Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to the present (C) time. Our results suggest a diverse distribution of carnivoran co-occurrence patterns at the continental scale as a result of spatial climatic variation as an important driver constrained by the ecological niches of the species. This influence was an important factor restructuring assemblages (more directly on richness than composition patterns) not only at the continental level, but also from regional and local scales and this influence was geographically different throughout the space in the continent. These climatic restrictions and disruption of the niche during the environmental changes at the LIG-LGM-C transition show a considerable shift in assemblage richness and composition across the Americas, which suggests an environ- mental filtering mainly during the LGM, explaining between 30 and 75% of these variations through space and time, with more accentuated changes in North than South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Pbmr-400 Benchmark Solution of Exercise 1 and 2 Using the Moose Based Applications: Mammoth, Pronghorn
    EPJ Web of Conferences 247, 06020 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124706020 PHYSOR2020 PBMR-400 BENCHMARK SOLUTION OF EXERCISE 1 AND 2 USING THE MOOSE BASED APPLICATIONS: MAMMOTH, PRONGHORN Paolo Balestra1, Sebastian Schunert1, Robert W Carlsen1, April J Novak2 Mark D DeHart1, Richard C Martineau1 1Idaho National Laboratory 955 MK Simpson Blvd, Idaho Falls, ID 83401, USA 2University of California, Berkeley 2000 Carleton Street, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT High temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGR) are a candidate for timely Gen-IV reac- tor technology deployment because of high technology readiness and walk-away safety. Among HTGRs, pebble bed reactors (PBRs) have attractive features such as low excess reactivity and online refueling. Pebble bed reactors pose unique challenges to analysts and reactor designers such as continuous burnup distribution depending on pebble mo- tion and recirculation, radiative heat transfer across a variety of gas-filled gaps, and long design basis transients such as pressurized and depressurized loss of forced circulation. Modeling and simulation is essential for both the PBR’s safety case and design process. In order to verify and validate the new generation codes the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Data bank provide a set of benchmarks data together with solutions calculated by the participants using the state of the art codes of that time. An important milestone to test the new PBR simulation codes is the OECD NEA PBMR-400 benchmark which includes thermal hydraulic and neutron kinetic standalone exercises as well as coupled exercises and transients scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genus-Level Phylogenetic Analysis of Antilocapridae And
    A GENUS-LEVEL PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF ANTILOCAPRIDAE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF HEADGEAR MORPHOLOGY AND PALEOECOLOGY by HOLLEY MAY FLORA A THESIS Presented to the Department of EArth Sciences And the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partiAl fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MAster of Science September 2019 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Holley MAy Flora Title: A Genus-level Phylogenetic Analysis of AntilocApridae and ImplicAtions for the Evolution of HeAdgeAr Morphology and PAleoecology This Thesis has been accepted and approved in partiAl fulfillment of the requirements for the MAster of Science degree in the Department of EArth Sciences by: EdwArd Byrd DAvis Advisor SAmAntha S. B. Hopkins Core Member Matthew Polizzotto Core Member Stephen Frost Institutional RepresentAtive And JAnet Woodruff-Borden DeAn of the Graduate School Original Approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School Degree awArded September 2019. ii ã 2019 Holley MAy Flora This work is licensed under a CreAtive Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (United States) License. iii THESIS ABSTRACT Holley MAy Flora MAster of Science Department of EArth Sciences September 2019 Title: A Genus-level Phylogenetic Analysis of AntilocApridae and ImplicAtions for the Evolution of HeAdgeAr Morphology and PAleoecology The shapes of Artiodactyl heAdgeAr plAy key roles in interactions with their environment and eAch other. Consequently, heAdgeAr morphology cAn be used to predict behavior. For eXAmple, lArger, recurved horns are typicAl of gregarious, lArge-bodied AnimAls fighting for mAtes. SmAller spike-like horns are more characteristic of small- bodied, paired mAtes from closed environments. Here, I report a genus-level clAdistic Analysis of the extinct family, AntilocApridae, testing prior hypotheses of evolutionary history And heAdgeAr evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Section E, Hoofed Animals
    Hoofed Animals Hoofed Section E Caribou Muskox Section E-1 Section E-2 Moose Section E-3 Section E Diseases and Parasites of Hoofed Animals Nose and throat bots Hoofed Animals Hoofed Head Photo Credit: NWT Wildlife Division Caribou Section E-1.1 Lumpy jaw Contagious ecthyma Photo Credit: NWT Wildlife Division Caribou Section E-1.2 Photo Credit: GNWT Muskox Section E-2.1 Muskox Section E-2.2 Hoofed Animals Hoofed Section E Diseases and Parasites of Hoofed Animals Besnoitiosis Wildlife Division NWT Photo credit: Head Photo Credit: Susan Kutz Caribou Section E-1.11 Muskox Section E-2.6 Ticks Skin Moose Section E-3.1 Section E Diseases and Parasites of Hoofed Animals Warts Hoofed Animals Hoofed Skin Photo Credit: D. Campbell Caribou Section E-1.3 Moose Section E-3.2 Warbles Contagious ecthyma Photo credit: Dr. G. Wobeser Photo credit: Dr. Photo Credit: GNWT Caribou Section E-1.4 Muskox Section E-2.2 Hoofed Animals Hoofed Section E Diseases and Parasites of Hoofed Animals Besnoitiosis Wildlife Division NWT Photo credit: Photo Credit: Susan Kutz Caribou Section E-1.11 Muskox Section E-2.6 Skin Brucellosis Photo credit: Dr. G. Wobeser G. Photo credit: Dr. Caribou Section E-1.10 Muskox Section E-2.5 Moose Section E-3.6 Section E Diseases and Parasites of Hoofed Animals Liver tapeworm cyst Hoofed Animals Hoofed Photo credit: Dr. G. Wobeser Photo credit: Dr. Caribou Section E-1.5 Organs Moose Section E-3.3 Tapeworm cysts in the Lungs (Hydatid disease) Brucellosis Photo credit: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronghorn G TAG
    ANTELOPE AND ... the American “antelope”! IRAFFE Pronghorn G TAG Why exhibit pronghorns? • Celebrate our local biodiversity by displaying the last surviving species of the Antilocapridae, a mammalian family endemic to North America. • Participate in a recovery program close to home: AZA maintains a priority insurance population of the critically endangered peninsular pronghorn. • Engage guests with these “antelope” from the familiar song “Home on the Range” (even though pronghorns aren’t true “antelope” at all!). • Let visitors get hands-on with the unusual horn sheaths of pronghorns - they are keratinous like horns, but are shed annually like antlers! • Seek partnerships with local running groups: pronghorn are the fastest land animals in North America, able to cover 6 miles in 9 minutes! • TAG Recommendation: Contact the SSP for guidance regarding which pronghorn program is best suited to your facility’s climate. MEASUREMENTS IUCN LEAST Length: 4.5 feet CONCERN Height: 3 feet (CITES I) Stewardship Opportunities at shoulder Peninsular Pronghorn Recovery Project Weight: 65-130 lbs <200 peninsular Contact Melodi Tayles: [email protected] Prairies North America in the wild Care and Husbandry RED SSP (peninsular): 25.26 (51) in 7 AZA institutions (2019) Species coordinator: Melodi Tayles, San Diego Zoo Safari Park [email protected] ; (760) 855-1911 CANDIDATE Program (generic): 34.61 (95) in 21 institutions (2014) Social nature: Herd living. Harem groups with a single male are typical. Bachelor groups may be successful in the absence of females. Mixed species: Pronghorn are frequently exhibited with bison. They have also been housed with camels, deer, cranes, and waterfowl. Housing: Peninsular pronghorn are heat tolerant and do well in windy conditions, but heated shelters recommended where temperatures fall below 40ºF for extended periods.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]