2009 End of Spray Season Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Role of Land Governance in Improving Tenure Security in Zambia: Towards a Strategic Framework F
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Lehrstuhl für Bodenordnung und Landentwicklung Institut für Geodäsie, GIS und Landmanagement Role of Land Governance in Improving Tenure Security in Zambia: Towards a Strategic Framework for Preventing Land Conflicts Anthony Mushinge Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Ingenieurfakultät Bau Geo Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor-Ingenieurs genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Ir. Walter Timo de Vries Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Holger Magel 2. Prof. Dr. sc. agr. Michael Kirk (Philipps Universität Marburg) 3. Prof. Dr. Jaap Zevenbergen (University of Twente / Niederlande) Die Dissertation wurde am 25.04.2017 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Ingenieurfakultät Bau Geo Umwelt am 25.08.2017 angenommen. Abstract Zambia is one of the countries in Africa with a high frequency of land conflicts. The conflicts over land lead to tenure insecurity. In response to the increasing number of land conflicts, the Zambian Government has undertaken measures to address land conflicts, but the measures are mainly curative in nature. But a conflict sensitive land governance framework should address both curative and preventive measures. In order to obtain insights about the actual realities on the ground, based on a case study approach, the research examined the role of existing state land governance framework in improving tenure security in Lusaka district, and established how land conflicts affect land tenure security. The research findings show that the present state land governance framework is malfunctional which cause land conflicts and therefore, tenure insecurity. The research further reveals that state land governance is characterised by defective legal and institutional framework and inappropriate technical (i.e. -
Zambia Country Profile Monitoring, Reporting and Verification for REDD+
OCCASIONAL PAPER Zambia country profile Monitoring, reporting and verification for REDD+ Michael Day Davison Gumbo Kaala B. Moombe Arief Wijaya Terry Sunderland OCCASIONAL PAPER 113 Zambia country profile Monitoring, reporting and verification for REDD+ Michael Day Center for International Forestry Research Davison Gumbo Center for International Forestry Research Kaala B. Moombe Center for International Forestry Research Arief Wijaya Center for International Forestry Research Terry Sunderland Center for International Forestry Research Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Occasional Paper 113 © 2014 Center for International Forestry Research Content in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ ISBN 978-602-1504-42-0 Day M, Gumbo D, Moombe KB, Wijaya A and Sunderland T. 2014. Zambia country profile: Monitoring, reporting and verification for REDD+. Occasional Paper 113. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. Photo by Terry Sunderland CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org We would like to thank all donors who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund. For a list of Fund donors please see: https://www.cgiarfund.org/FundDonors Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the editors, the authors’ institutions, the financial sponsors or the -
FORM #3 Grants Solicitation and Management Quarterly
FORM #3 Grants Solicitation and Management Quarterly Progress Report Grantee Name: Maternal and Child Survival Program Grant Number: # AID-OAA-A-14-00028 Primary contact person regarding this report: Mira Thompson ([email protected]) Reporting for the quarter Period: Year 3, Quarter 1 (October –December 2018) 1. Briefly describe any significant highlights/accomplishments that took place during this reporting period. Please limit your comments to a maximum of 4 to 6 sentences. During this reporting period, MCSP Zambia: Supported MOH to conduct a data quality assessment to identify and address data quality gaps that some districts have been recording due to inability to correctly interpret data elements in HMIS tools. Some districts lacked the revised registers as well. Collected data on Phase 2 of the TA study looking at the acceptability, level of influence, and results of MCSP’s TA model that supports the G2G granting mechanism. Data collection included interviews with 53 MOH staff from 4 provinces, 20 districts and 20 health facilities. Supported 16 districts in mentorship and service quality assessment (SQA) to support planning and decision-making. In the period under review, MCSP established that multidisciplinary mentorship teams in 10 districts in Luapula Province were functional. Continued with the eIMCI/EPI course orientation in all Provinces. By the end of the quarter under review, in Muchinga 26 HCWs had completed the course, increasing the number of HCWs who improved EPI knowledge and can manage children using IMNCI Guidelines. In Southern Province, 19 mentors from 4 districts were oriented through the electronic EPI/IMNCI interactive learning and had the software installed on their computers. -
1"Torking Paper No. 2 2
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ON HUMAN SETTLEMENTS AND NATURAL RESOURCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 1"torking Paper No. 2 2 Clark University Institute for Development Anthropology International Development Program 99 Collier Street 950 Main Street Suite 302, P.O. Box 2207 Worcester, MA 01610 Binghamton, NY 13902 A HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: THE ZAMBIAN PORTION OF THE MIDDLE ZAMBEZI VALLEY AND THE LAKE KARIBA BASIN by Thayer Scudder Institute of Development Anthropology and California Institute of Technology August 1985 Clark University/Institute for Development Anthropology Cooperative Agreement on Human Settlement and Natural Resource Systems Analysis COITUTS 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 2. OVERVIEW . o . *. s.*. # o a o 3 3. 1901-1931: THE LOCAL ECONOMY DURING THE INITIAL YEARS OF ADMINISTRATION AND THE PROBLEM OF FAMINE. .. ... 7 4. 1932-1954: ATTEMPTS TO ALLEVIATE FAMINE . .. 11 5. 1955-1974: THE YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT . .. .. 14 a. Introduction . .. ... .. ... 14 b. The Background of the Kariba Dam Project .. 14 c. Policy and Institutional Infrastructure for Gwembe Development . ... ... ... 177 d. Physical and Social Infrastructure ... ......... 25 e. The Lake Kariba Gillnet Fishery .... ............. 27 f. Tsetse Control and the Buildup in Cattle Numbers . 30 g. Rainfed Agriculture ..... ................. 37 h. Flood Water Cultivation and Irrigation ... .. 41 (1) Flood Water Cultivation .............. 42 (2) Gravity Flow and Pump Irrigation ... 43 i. Coal Mining and Township Development ... .. 47 6. 1975-1983: ECONOMIC DOWNTURN AND THE COLLAPSE OF THE DISTRICT ECONOMY. .. .. 49 a. At the District and Village Level . ... .. .. 49 b. At the National Level. .. ... 52 c. Local Responses to Downturn . .. .. 53 7. THE LONGSTANDING CAUSES OF DOWNTURN. ... ... ... 56 a. Deteriorating International Terms of Trade . -
The Opportunity Costs of REDD+ in Zambia
The Opportunity Costs of REDD+ in Zambia This assignment was undertaken on request by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations in Zambia under contract Number: UNJP/ZAM/068/UNJ – 09 – 12 - PHS Team Director: Saviour Chishimba Consultant: Monica Chundama Data Analyst: Akakandelwa Akakandelwa Technical Team Chithuli Makota (REDD+) Edmond Kangamugazi (Economist) Saul Banda, Jnr. (Livelihoods) Authors: Saviour Chishimba (Lead Author) Monica Chundama Akakandelwa Akakandelwa Citation: Chishimba, S., Chundama, M. & Akakandelwa, A. (2013). The Opportunity Costs of REDD+ in Zambia. The views expressed in this document are not of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, but of the consulting firm. The Opportunity Costs of REDD+ in Zambia FINAL REPORT Saviour Chishimba (Lead Author) Monica Chundama Akakandelwa Akakandelwa 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The directors and staff of Even Ha’Ezer Consult Limited are indebted to Mr. Deuteronomy Kasaro and Mrs Maurine Mwale of the Forestry Department and Dr. Julian Fox and Ms. Celestina Lwatula of the UN-REDD Programme at FAO for providing the necessary logistical support, without which, the assignment would not have been completed. Saviour Chishimba Chief Executive Officer Even Ha’Ezer Consult Limited EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Preserving forests entails foregoing the benefits that would have been generated by alternative deforesting and forest degrading land uses (for example agriculture, charcoal burning, etc). The difference between the benefits provided by the forest and those that would have been provided by the alternative land use is the opportunity cost of avoiding deforestation and forest degradation. Foregoing the economic benefits that come with deforestation and forest degradation will only make sense to policy makers and the general population if alternatives that are advanced under REDD+ offer sufficient sustainable benefits. -
Zambia Project
STRENGTHENING EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE – UP (STEP-UP) ZAMBIA PROJECT QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FY 2014 Q3: APRIL 1 – JUNE 30, 2014 Contract No. AID-611-C-12-00001 JULY 31, 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Cover photo: A Grade One learner demonstrates her literacy skills in front of provincial and district educational officers at the provincial launch of the Let’s Read Zambia campaign in Southern Province. Though she is a Grade One student, she is able to read from a Grade Two textbook. STEP-UP ZAMBIA FY2014 Q3 PROGRESS REPORT ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2 A. INTEGRATE AND STRENGTHEN SYSTEMS FOR IMPROVED DECISION-MAKING (TASK 1) 6 B. PROMOTE EQUITY AS A CENTRAL THEME IN POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION (TASK 2) 9 C. INSTITUTIONALIZE THE MESVTEE’S MANAGEMENT OF HIV AND AIDS WORKPLACE POLICIES (TASK 3) 9 D. STRENGTHEN DECENTRALIZATION FOR IMPROVED LEARNER PERFORMANCE (TASK 4) 15 E. ENGAGE ZAMBIAN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE MESVTEE POLICY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS (TASK 5) 24 F. MANAGEMENT, MONITORING, AND EVALUATION 28 III. GOALS FOR NEXT QUARTER 30 ANNEX A: SUCCESS STORY 32 ANNEX B: STATUS OF M&E INDICATORS 35 ANNEX C: ACTIVE DATA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES 39 STEP-UP ZAMBIA FY2014 Q3 PROGRESS REPORT iii -
Livelihood Zones Analysis Zambia
Improved livelihoods for smallholder farmers LIVELIHOOD ZONES ANALYSIS A tool for planning agricultural water management investments Zambia Prepared by Mukelabai Ndiyoi & Mwase Phiri, Farming Systems Association of Zambia (FASAZ), Lusaka, Zambia, in consultation with FAO, 2010 About this report The AgWater Solutions Project aimed at designing agricultural water management (AWM) strategies for smallholder farmers in sub Saharan Africa and in India. The project was managed by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and operated jointly with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), the Stockholm Environmental Institute (SEI) and International Development Enterprise (IDE). It was implemented in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, Tanzania, Zambia and in the States of Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal in India. Several studies have highlighted the potential of AWM for poverty alleviation. In practice, however, adoption rates of AWM solutions remain low, and where adoption has taken place locally, programmes aimed at disseminating these solutions often remain a challenge. The overall goal of the project was to stimulate and support successful pro-poor, gender-equitable AWM investments, policies and implementation strategies through concrete, evidence-based knowledge and decision-making tools. The project has examined AWM interventions at the farm, community, watershed, and national levels. It has analyzed opportunities and constraints of a number of small-scale AWM interventions in several pilot research sites across the different project countries, and assessed their potential in different agro-climatic, socio-economic and political contexts. This report was prepared as part of the efforts to assess the potential for AWM solutions at national level. -
Chiefdoms/Chiefs in Zambia
CHIEFDOMS/CHIEFS IN ZAMBIA 1. CENTRAL PROVINCE A. Chibombo District Tribe 1 HRH Chief Chitanda Lenje People 2 HRH Chieftainess Mungule Lenje People 3 HRH Chief Liteta Lenje People B. Chisamba District 1 HRH Chief Chamuka Lenje People C. Kapiri Mposhi District 1 HRH Senior Chief Chipepo Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukonchi Swaka People 3 HRH Chief Nkole Swaka People D. Ngabwe District 1 HRH Chief Ngabwe Lima/Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukubwe Lima/Lenje People E. Mkushi District 1 HRHChief Chitina Swaka People 2 HRH Chief Shaibila Lala People 3 HRH Chief Mulungwe Lala People F. Luano District 1 HRH Senior Chief Mboroma Lala People 2 HRH Chief Chembe Lala People 3 HRH Chief Chikupili Swaka People 4 HRH Chief Kanyesha Lala People 5 HRHChief Kaundula Lala People 6 HRH Chief Mboshya Lala People G. Mumbwa District 1 HRH Chief Chibuluma Kaonde/Ila People 2 HRH Chieftainess Kabulwebulwe Nkoya People 3 HRH Chief Kaindu Kaonde People 4 HRH Chief Moono Ila People 5 HRH Chief Mulendema Ila People 6 HRH Chief Mumba Kaonde People H. Serenje District 1 HRH Senior Chief Muchinda Lala People 2 HRH Chief Kabamba Lala People 3 HRh Chief Chisomo Lala People 4 HRH Chief Mailo Lala People 5 HRH Chieftainess Serenje Lala People 6 HRH Chief Chibale Lala People I. Chitambo District 1 HRH Chief Chitambo Lala People 2 HRH Chief Muchinka Lala People J. Itezhi Tezhi District 1 HRH Chieftainess Muwezwa Ila People 2 HRH Chief Chilyabufu Ila People 3 HRH Chief Musungwa Ila People 4 HRH Chief Shezongo Ila People 5 HRH Chief Shimbizhi Ila People 6 HRH Chief Kaingu Ila People K. -
List of Districts of Zambia
S.No Province District 1 Central Province Chibombo District 2 Central Province Kabwe District 3 Central Province Kapiri Mposhi District 4 Central Province Mkushi District 5 Central Province Mumbwa District 6 Central Province Serenje District 7 Central Province Luano District 8 Central Province Chitambo District 9 Central Province Ngabwe District 10 Central Province Chisamba District 11 Central Province Itezhi-Tezhi District 12 Central Province Shibuyunji District 13 Copperbelt Province Chililabombwe District 14 Copperbelt Province Chingola District 15 Copperbelt Province Kalulushi District 16 Copperbelt Province Kitwe District 17 Copperbelt Province Luanshya District 18 Copperbelt Province Lufwanyama District 19 Copperbelt Province Masaiti District 20 Copperbelt Province Mpongwe District 21 Copperbelt Province Mufulira District 22 Copperbelt Province Ndola District 23 Eastern Province Chadiza District 24 Eastern Province Chipata District 25 Eastern Province Katete District 26 Eastern Province Lundazi District 27 Eastern Province Mambwe District 28 Eastern Province Nyimba District 29 Eastern Province Petauke District 30 Eastern Province Sinda District 31 Eastern Province Vubwi District 32 Luapula Province Chiengi District 33 Luapula Province Chipili District 34 Luapula Province Chembe District 35 Luapula Province Kawambwa District 36 Luapula Province Lunga District 37 Luapula Province Mansa District 38 Luapula Province Milenge District 39 Luapula Province Mwansabombwe District 40 Luapula Province Mwense District 41 Luapula Province Nchelenge -
Zambia UN-REDD PROGRAMME 17-19 March 2010
UN-REDD/PB4/4ci/ENG National Programme Document - Zambia UN-REDD PROGRAMME 17-19 March 2010 In accordance with the decision of the Policy Board this document is printed in limited numbers to minimize the environmental impact of the UN- REDD Programme processes and contribute to climate neutrality. Participants are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings. Most of the UN- REDD Programmes meeting documents are available on the internet at: www.unredd.net. 03/03/2010 UN COLLABORATIVE PROGRAMME ON REDUCING EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES NATIONAL JOINT PROGRAMME DOCUMENT Country: Republic of Zambia Programme Title: UN-REDD Programme – Zambia Quick Start Initiative Programme Goal: To prepare Zambian institutions and stakeholders for effective nationwide implementation of the REDD+ mechanism. Programme Objectives: i) Build institutional and stakeholder capacity to implement REDD+ ii) Develop an enabling policy environment for REDD+ iii) Develop REDD+ benefit-sharing models iv) Develop Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) systems for REDD+ Joint Programme Outcomes: Outcome 1: Capacity to manage REDD+ Readiness strengthened Outcome 2: Broad-based stakeholder support for REDD+ established Outcome 3: National governance framework and institutional capacities for the implementation of REDD+ strengthened Outcome 4: National REDD+ strategies identified Outcome 5: MRV capacity to implement REDD+ strengthened Outcome 6: Assessment of reference emission level (REL) and reference level (RL) undertaken Programme Duration: __3 years________ Total estimated budget*: USD 4.49 million Anticipated start/end dates: _09/2010 -08/2013_ Out of which: Fund Management Option(s): pass-through 1. Funded Budget: USD 4.49 million Managing or Administrative Agent: UNDP MDTF 2. -
Country Gender Profile: Zambia Final Report
Country Gender Profile: Zambia Final Report March 2016 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Japan Development Service Co., Ltd. (JDS) EI JR 16-098 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) commissioned Japan Development Service Co., Ltd. to carry out research for the Country Gender Profile for Zambia from October 2015 to March 2016. This report was prepared based on a desk review and field research in Zambia during this period as a reference for JICA for its implementation of development assistance for Zambia. The views and analysis contained in the publication, therefore, do not necessarily reflect the views of JICA. SUMMARY I. General Situation of Women and Government’s Efforts towards Gender Equality General Situation of Women in the Republic of Zambia In the Republic of Zambia (hereinafter referred to as “Zambia”, there exists a deep-rooted concept of an unequal gender relationship in which men are considered to be superior to women. This biased view regarding gender equality originates from not only traditional cultural and social norms but also from the dual structure of statutory law and customary law. Rights, which are supposed to be protected under statutory law, are not necessarily observed and women endure unfair treatment in terms of child marriage, unequal distribution of property, etc. Meanwhile, there have been some positive developments at the policy level, including the establishment of an independent Ministry of Gender, introduction of specific gender policies and revision of certain provisions of the Constitution, which epitomise gender inequality (currently being deliberated). According to a report1 published in 2015, Zambia ranks as low as 11th of 15 countries surveyed among Southern African Development Community (SADC) members in the areas of women’s participation in politics. -
Ministry of Community Development, Mother and Child Health
REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, MOTHER AND CHILD HEALTH SOCIAL CASH TRANSFER SCHEME 24-Month Impact Report for the Child Grant Programme September 2013 Principal investigators: Dr. David Seidenfeld, Dr. Sudhanshu Handa, and Dr. Gelson Tembo American Institutes for Research 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street NW, Washington, DC 20007-3835 | 202.403.5000 | TTY 877.334.3499 | www.air.org Contents Contributors .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 10 II. Conceptual Framework ........................................................................................................................... 12 III. Study Design ........................................................................................................................................... 14 IV. Attrition.................................................................................................................................................