DOCSLIB.ORG

Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation Land And EPA 510-B-17-003 Emergency Management October 2017 5401R www.epa.gov/ust How To Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies For Underground Storage Tank Sites A Guide For Corrective Action Plan Reviewers Chapter XIV Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation Contents Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Initial Screening Of Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation ........................................................... 4 Detailed Evaluation Of Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation ...................................................... 7 Site Characteristics Affecting Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation ...................................... 10 Hydraulic Conductivity And Soil Permeability..................................................................................... 10 Groundwater Flow Direction And Velocity ......................................................................................... 11 Depth To Groundwater ....................................................................................................................... 12 Soil Structure And Stratification ......................................................................................................... 12 Porosity ............................................................................................................................................... 14 Oxidation-Reduction Potential ........................................................................................................... 15 Terminal Electron Acceptors ............................................................................................................... 16 Groundwater Geochemistry ............................................................................................................... 17 Groundwater pH ................................................................................................................................. 18 Groundwater Temperature ................................................................................................................ 19 Microbial Presence ............................................................................................................................. 20 Bioaugmentation ................................................................................................................................ 21 Constituent Characteristics Affecting Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation ......................... 21 Biodegradability .................................................................................................................................. 21 Location Of Contamination ................................................................................................................. 23 Concentration And Toxicity ................................................................................................................. 26 Solubility .............................................................................................................................................. 27 Soil Sorption ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Special Considerations For MTBE And Other Fuel Oxygenates .......................................................... 29 Treatability Testing ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Evaluation Of Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation Design ...................................................... 33 Design Basis ............................................................................................................................................. 33 Cleanup Goals ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Technology Selection .............................................................................................................................. 36 Selection Of Electron Acceptors ......................................................................................................... 37 November 2016 XIV-iii Delivery Methods ................................................................................................................................ 42 Design Components ................................................................................................................................ 46 Components Of An Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation System ......................................... 49 Types And Locations Of Wells ............................................................................................................. 49 Nutrient Concentrations ..................................................................................................................... 54 Aquifer Matrix Diffusion Potential ...................................................................................................... 54 Evaluation Of Operation And Monitoring Plans ......................................................................................... 55 Remedial Performance Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 55 Maintenance Of The Remedy ............................................................................................................. 60 Unintended Consequences ................................................................................................................. 61 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................................................... 62 References .................................................................................................................................................. 64 Anaerobic Reductive Bioremediation ..................................................................................................... 71 Checklist: Can Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation Be Used At This Site? ............................... 73 November 2016 XIV-iv List Of Exhibits Number Title Page XIV-1 Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation: Primary Advantages And Disadvantages .......... 4 XIV-2 Initial Screening For Potential Effectiveness Of Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation . 6 XIV-3 Key Parameters Used To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation ............................................................................................................................... 8 XIV-4 Detailed Screening For Potential Effectiveness Of Enhanced Anaerobic Oxidative Bioremediation ............................................................................................................................... 9 XIV-5 Redox Potentials For Various Electron Acceptors ........................................................................ 16 XIV-6 Conceptualization Of Electron Acceptor Zones In The Subsurface Downgradient Of A Petroleum Release ......................................................................................................................................... 17 XIV-7 Average Temperature Of Shallow Groundwater ......................................................................... 19 XIV-8 Composition And Relative Biodegradability Of Petroleum Products ........................................... 23 XIV-9 Constituent Concentration And EAOB Effectiveness ................................................................... 27 XIV-10 Solubility Values For Select Petroleum Hydrocarbon Constituents ............................................. 28 XIV-11 MTBE Considerations For Applying EAOB .................................................................................... 31 XIV-12 EAOB Design Basis Factors ........................................................................................................... 35 XIV-13 Anaerobic Biodegradability Of Selected Petroleum Constituents Using Various Electron Acceptors ...................................................................................................................................... 37 XIV-14 BTEX Mass That Can Be Biodegraded By Various Electron Acceptors ......................................... 38 XIV-15 Advantages And Disadvantages Of Various Electron Acceptors .................................................. 39 XIV-16 Delivery Methods For In-Situ Bioremediation ............................................................................. 44 XIV-17 Various Treatment Configurations ............................................................................................... 45 XIV-18 Suggested EAOB Design Components .......................................................................................... 48 XIV-19 Major Components Of EAOB Systems .......................................................................................... 49 XIV-20 Recirculation System Layout ........................................................................................................ 51 XIV-21 Schematic Of A Horizontal Recirculation System ......................................................................... 52 XIV-22 Common Performance Monitoring Parameters And Sampling Frequencies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biostimulation of in Situ Microbial Degradation Processes in Organically-Enriched Sediments Mitigates the Impact of Aquaculture
    Chemosphere 226 (2019) 715e725 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemosphere journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere Biostimulation of in situ microbial degradation processes in organically-enriched sediments mitigates the impact of aquaculture Francesca Ape a, Elena Manini b, Grazia Marina Quero c, Gian Marco Luna b, * Gianluca Sara d, Paolo Vecchio e, Pierlorenzo Brignoli e, Sante Ansferri e, Simone Mirto a, a Istituto per lo studio degli impatti Antropici e Sostenibilita in ambiente marino (IAS-CNR), Via G. da Verrazzano, 17, 91014, Castellammare del Golfo, TP, Italy b Istituto per le Risorse Biologiche e le Biotecnologie Marine (IRBIM-CNR), Via Largo Fiera della Pesca, 1 e 60122 Ancona, Italy c Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Integrative Marine Ecology Department, 80121, Napoli, Italy d Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed. 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy e Eurovix S.p.A. - V.le E. Mattei 17, 24060, Entratico (Bergamo), Italy highlights graphical abstract Bioremediation reduces the accumu- lation of organic matter in fish farm sediments. The bioactivator stimulates in situ microbial degradation processes. Bioremediation induces shifts in prokaryotic community composition. A shift from anaerobic to aerobic prokaryotic metabolism is promoted. The treatment is ineffective on the fecal bacteria from farmed fishes. article info abstract Article history: Fish farm deposition, resulting in organic matter accumulation on bottom sediments, has been identified Received 9 November 2018 as among the main phenomena causing negative environmental impacts in aquaculture. An in situ Received in revised form bioremediation treatment was carried out in order to reduce the organic matter accumulation in the fish 12 March 2019 farm sediments by promoting the natural microbial biodegradation processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostimulation of Some Fungal Strains for the Degradation of Atrazine
    Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: I Interdisciplinary Volume 18 Issue 2 Version 1.0 Year 2018 Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Online ISSN: 2249-4626 & Print ISSN: 0975-5896 Biostimulation of Some Fungal Strains for the Degradation of Atrazine Contaminated Soil By Danjuma Isah, Mohammed Adamu Milala & Adams Lawan Ngala University of Maiduguri Abstract- Biostimulatory effects of cow dung on some fungal biodegradation of atrazine. This work was designed to investigate the effect of using a biostimulant (cow dung) on some fungal strains for the possible degradation of atrazine-contaminated soil. The physicochemical characteristics of the soil and cow dung were determined using standard methods. The effects of pre and post biostimulation of fungal species were carried out using enumeration techniques. Fungal strains such as Trichoderma harzianum and Aspergillus niger were identified based on macroscopic and microscopic identification. Atrazine degradation was monitored by assaying the enzymes involved in the degradation and its metabolites using GC-MS techniques. The results of the soil physicochemical characteristics showed slightly acidic pH (6.7±0.99), moderate calcium (6.3±0.19Cmol/kg), high magnesium (5.10±0.38 Cmol/kg), moderate potassium (0.48±0.02 Cmol/kg, low sodium (0.15±0.01 Cmol/kg), moderately low nitrogen (0.16±0.01g/kg), moderate phosphorus (12.22±1.45 g/kg), high O.C(15.38±0.05 g/kg) were obtained respectively. Keywords: atrazine, biostimulation, degradation, fungi, contamination, soil. GJSFR-I Classification: FOR Code: 060199 BiostimulationofSomeFungalStrainsfortheDegradationofAtrazineContaminatedSoil Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of: © 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Biostimulation and Bioaugmentation for Remediation of Soil Contaminated with Spent Motor Oil
    Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 8 (1), 187-194, Winter 2011 S. Abdulsalam et al. ISSN: 1735-1472 © IRSEN, CEERS, IAU Comparison of biostimulation and bioaugmentation for remediation of soil contaminated with spent motor oil 1*S. Abdulsalam; 2I. M. Bugaje; 3S. S. Adefila; 4S. Ibrahim Chemical Engineering Programme, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria Department of Chemical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria Department of Biochemistry and Director Centre for Biotechnology, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria Received 30 July 2010; revised 3 September 2010; accepted 12 November 2010; available online 1 December 2010 ABSTRACT: Aerobic fixed bed bioreactors were used to study and compare biostimulation and bioaugmentation for remediation of soil contaminated with spent motor oil. Bioaugmentation using consortium of bacteria and biostimulation using inorganic fertilizer and potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate were investigated. The bioremediation indicators used were the oil and grease content removals, total heterotrophic bacteria counts and carbon dioxide respiration rates. Results showed that biodegradations were very effective with 50, 66 and 75 % oil and grease content removal efficiencies for control, bioaugmentation and biostimulation respectively after ten weeks. Carbon dioxide respiration followed similar pattern as the oil and grease content removals. Biostimulation option has the highest carbon dioxide generation (6 249 mg/kg) and the control with the least (4 276 mg/kg). Therefore, the biostimulation option can be used to develop a realistic treatment technology for soils contaminated with spent motor oil. Keywords: Bacterial count; Bioremediation; Carbon dioxide respiration; Closed system; Fixed bed bioreactor; Oil and grease content INTRODUCTION The quality of life on earth is linked, inextricably, to many of these sites, either as a response to the risk of the overall quality of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostimulation Is a Valuable Tool to Assess Pesticide Biodegradation Capacity of Groundwater Microorganisms
    Chemosphere 280 (2021) 130793 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemosphere journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere Biostimulation is a valuable tool to assess pesticide biodegradation capacity of groundwater microorganisms Andrea Aldas-Vargas, Thomas van der Vooren, Huub H.M. Rijnaarts, Nora B. Sutton * Environmental Technology, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700, EV, Wageningen, the Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handling Editor: Chang- Ping Yu Groundwater is the main source for drinking water production globally. Groundwater unfortunately can contain micropollutants (MPs) such as pesticides and/or pesticide metabolites. Biological remediation of MPs in Keywords: groundwater requires an understanding of natural biodegradation capacity and the conditions required to 2,4-D, Biodegradation stimulate biodegradation activity. Thus, biostimulation experiments are a valuable tool to assess pesticide Biostimulation biodegradation capacity of fieldmicroorganisms. To this end, groundwater samples were collected at a drinking Degradation capacity water abstraction aquifer at two locations, fivedifferent depths. Biodegradation of the MPs BAM, MCPP and 2,4- Pesticides D was assessed in microcosms with groundwater samples, either without amendment, or amended with electron acceptor (nitrate or oxygen) and/or carbon substrate (dissolved organic carbon (DOC)). Oxygen + DOC was the most successful amendment resulting in complete biodegradation of 2,4-D in all microcosms after 42 days. DOC was most likely used as a growth substrate that enhanced co-metabolic 2,4-D degradation with oxygen as electron acceptor. Different biodegradation rates were observed per groundwater sample. Overall, microor­ ganisms from the shallow aquifer had faster biodegradation rates than those from the deep aquifer. Higher microbial activity was also observed in terms of CO2 production in the microcosms with shallow groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostimulation Proved to Be the Most Efficient Method in the Comparison of in Situ Soil Remediation Treatments After a Simulated Oil Spill Accident
    Environ Sci Pollut Res DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7606-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Biostimulation proved to be the most efficient method in the comparison of in situ soil remediation treatments after a simulated oil spill accident Suvi Simpanen 1 & Mari Dahl1 & Magdalena Gerlach1 & Anu Mikkonen2 & Vuokko Malk1,3 & Juha Mikola1 & Martin Romantschuk1 Received: 10 May 2016 /Accepted: 5 September 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The use of in situ techniques in soil remediation is reduced contaminant leakage through the soil. The chemical still rare in Finland and most other European countries due to oxidation did not enhance soil cleanup and resulted in the the uncertainty of the effectiveness of the techniques especial- mobilization of contaminants. Our results suggest that bio- ly in cold regions and also due to their potential side effects on stimulation can decrease or even prevent oil migration in re- the environment. In this study, we compared the biostimula- cently contaminated areas and can thus be considered as a tion, chemical oxidation, and natural attenuation treatments in potentially safe in situ treatment also in groundwater areas. natural conditions and pilot scale during a 16-month experi- ment. A real fuel spill accident was used as a model for ex- Keywords Hydrocarbon contamination . Soil periment setup and soil contamination. We found that biostim- bioremediation . Biodegradation . Biostimulation . Chemical ulation significantly decreased the contaminant leachate into oxidation . Molecular monitoring the water, including also the non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL). The total NAPL leachate was 19 % lower in the biostimulation treatment that in the untreated soil and 34 % Abbreviations lower in the biostimulation than oxidation treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Nanotechnology for the Bioremediation of Contaminants: a Review
    processes Review Use of Nanotechnology for the Bioremediation of Contaminants: A Review Edgar Vázquez-Núñez 1,* , Carlos Eduardo Molina-Guerrero 1, Julián Mario Peña-Castro 2, Fabián Fernández-Luqueño 3 and Ma. Guadalupe de la Rosa-Álvarez 1 1 Departamento de Ingenierías Química, Electrónica y Biomédica, División de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Campus León, Universidad de Guanajuato, Lomas del Bosque 103, Lomas del Campestre, León, Guanajuato C.P. 37150, Mexico; cmolina@fisica.ugto.mx (C.E.M.-G.); [email protected] (M.G.d.l.R.-Á.) 2 Laboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad del Papaloapan, Tuxtepec, Oaxaca C.P. 68333, Mexico; [email protected] 3 Programas en Sustentabilidad de los Recursos Naturales y Energía, Cinvestav Saltillo Industrial, Parque Industrial, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila C.P. 25900, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: edgarvqznz@fisica.ugto.mx Received: 22 May 2020; Accepted: 8 July 2020; Published: 13 July 2020 Abstract: Contaminants, organic or inorganic, represent a threat for the environment and human health and in recent years their presence and persistence has increased rapidly. For this reason, several technologies including bioremediation in combination with nanotechnology have been explored to identify more systemic approaches for their removal from environmental matrices. Understanding the interaction between the contaminant, the microorganism, and the nanomaterials (NMs) is of crucial importance since positive and negative effects may be produced. For example, some nanomaterials are stimulants for microorganisms, while others are toxic. Thus, proper selection is of paramount importance. The main objective of this review was to analyze the principles of bioremediation assisted by nanomaterials, nanoparticles (NPs) included, and their interaction with environmental matrices.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: a Review
    International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 1, 28-39 Available online at http://pubs.sciepub.com/ijebb/3/1/5 © Science and Education Publishing DOI:10.12691/ijebb-3-1-5 Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: A Review Godleads Omokhagbor Adams1,*, Prekeyi Tawari Fufeyin1, Samson Eruke Okoro2, Igelenyah Ehinomen1 1Department of Animal and Environmental Biology, University of Benin, Edo State Nigeria 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State Nigeria *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received February 21, 2015; Revised February 28, 2015; Accepted March 05, 2015 Abstract Bioremediation uses microbial metabolism in the presence of optimum environmental conditions and sufficient nutrients to breakdown contaminants notably petroleum hydrocarbons. We reviewed technologies for carrying out bioremediation and observed that biotechnological approaches that are designed to carry out remediation have received a great deal of attention in recent years. Biostimulation (meaning the addition of limiting nutrients to support microbial growth) and Bioaugmentation (meaning the addition of living cells capable of degradation) studies have enjoyed a heavy presence in literature and reviews of these technologies focusing on the technical aspects are very few if at all available. At times, nutrient application alone or augmenting with microbes is not sufficient enough for remediation leading to a simultaneous approach. Recent studies show that a combination of both approaches is equally feasible but not explicitly more beneficial. Evidently, selection of a technology hinges on site specific requirements such as availability of microorganisms capable of degradation in sufficient quantities, nutrient availability to support microbial growth and proliferation as well as environmental parameters such as temperature in combination with duration of exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Biodegradation of Atrazine
    Universidade de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Departamento de Biologia Vegetal STUDIES ON THE BIODEGRADATION OF ATRAZINE IN SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH A COMMERCIAL FORMULATION CONTAINING ATRAZINE AND S-METOLACHLOR: SCALE-UP OF A BIOREMEDIATION TOOL BASED ON PSEUDOMONAS SP. ADP AND EVALUATION OF ITS EFFICACY Ana Catarina da Silva Portinha e Costa Mestrado em Biologia Celular e Biotecnologia Setembro 2008 Universidade de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Departamento de Biologia Vegetal STUDIES ON THE BIODEGRADATION OF ATRAZINE IN SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH A COMMERCIAL FORMULATION CONTAINING ATRAZINE AND S-METOLACHLOR: SCALE-UP OF A BIOREMEDIATION TOOL BASED ON PSEUDOMONAS SP. ADP AND EVALUATION OF ITS EFFICACY Ana Catarina da Silva Portinha e Costa Mestrado em Biologia Celular e Biotecnologia Dissertação orientada por: Doutora Cristina Anjinho Viegas (Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa) Doutora Maria Isabel Caçador (Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa) Setembro 2008 ABSTRACT Atrazine has been used worldwide since 1952 and is frequently detected above the levels established by regulatory authorities in consumption waters. Therefore, and because of its ecotoxicological properties, its use has been forbidden in most European countries, including Portugal. However, atrazine is still used in many countries worldwide. The main purpose of the present work was to examine the efficacy of the atrazine- degrading bacteria Pseudomonas sp. ADP ( P. ADP) as bioaugmentation agent in soils contaminated with high doses (~20x and ~50xRD; RD – Recommended dose) of the commercial formulation, Primextra S-Gold, that contains atrazine, and also S-metolachlor and benoxacor as main active ingredients. It was also tested the effect of combining bioaugmentation and biostimulation using soil amendment with trisodium citrate in open soil microcosms, with the purpose of scaling-up this bioremediation tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioremediation of Agricultural Soils Polluted with Pesticides: a Review
    bioengineering Review Bioremediation of Agricultural Soils Polluted with Pesticides: A Review Carla Maria Raffa and Fulvia Chiampo * Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-011-090-4685 Abstract: Pesticides are chemical compounds used to eliminate pests; among them, herbicides are compounds particularly toxic to weeds, and this property is exploited to protect the crops from unwanted plants. Pesticides are used to protect and maximize the yield and quality of crops. The excessive use of these chemicals and their persistence in the environment have generated serious problems, namely pollution of soil, water, and, to a lower extent, air, causing harmful effects to the ecosystem and along the food chain. About soil pollution, the residual concentration of pesticides is often over the limits allowed by the regulations. Where this occurs, the challenge is to reduce the amount of these chemicals and obtain agricultural soils suitable for growing ecofriendly crops. The microbial metabolism of indigenous microorganisms can be exploited for degradation since bioremediation is an ecofriendly, cost-effective, rather efficient method compared to the physical and chemical ones. Several biodegradation techniques are available, based on bacterial, fungal, or enzymatic degradation. The removal efficiencies of these processes depend on the type of pollutant and the chemical and physical conditions of the soil. The regulation on the use of pesticides is strictly connected to their environmental impacts. Nowadays, every country can adopt regulations to restrict the consumption of pesticides, prohibit the most harmful ones, and define the admissible concen- Citation: Raffa, C.M.; Chiampo, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Supporting the Use of Environmental Remediation to Improve Water Quality in the South Marine Plan Areas
    Evidence Supporting the Use of Environmental Remediation to Improve Water Quality in the South Marine Plan Areas MMO Project No: 1105 February 2016 Evidence Supporting the Use of Environmental Remediation to Improve Water Quality in the South Marine Plan Areas MMO Project No: 1105 Project funded by: The Marine Management Organisation Report prepared by: Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Studies (IECS), The University of Hull © Marine Management Organisation 2016 This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium (under the terms of the Open Government Licence www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/). It may only be re-used accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Marine Management Organisation Copyright and use of it must give the title of the source publication. Where third party Copyright material has been identified, further use of that material requires permission from the Copyright holders concerned. Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both the MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the MMO nor are they intended to indicate how the MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another. The MMO is not liable for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained nor is it responsible for any use of the content.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Short-Term Microbial Degradation in Circulating Water Reducing High Stagnant Atrazine Concentrations in Subsurface Sediments
    water Article Improved Short-Term Microbial Degradation in Circulating Water Reducing High Stagnant Atrazine Concentrations in Subsurface Sediments Xinxin Liu 1, Nan Hui 2,* and Merja H. Kontro 3 1 Instrumental Analysis Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; [email protected] 2 School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China 3 Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 15140 Lahti, Finland; merja.kontro@helsinki.fi * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 June 2020; Accepted: 5 September 2020; Published: 8 September 2020 Abstract: The triazine herbicide atrazine easily leaches with water through soil layers into groundwater, where it is persistent. Its behavior during short-term transport is poorly understood, and there is no in situ remediation method for it. The aim of this study was to investigate whether water circulation, or circulation combined with bioaugmentation (Pseudomonas sp. ADP, or four isolates from atrazine-contaminated sediments) alone or with biostimulation (Na-citrate), could enhance 1 atrazine dissipation in subsurface sediment–water systems. Atrazine concentrations (100 mg L− ) in the liquid phase of sediment slurries and in the circulating water of sediment columns were 1 followed for 10 days. Atrazine was rapidly degraded to 53–64 mg L− in the slurries, and further 1 to 10–18 mg L− in the circulating water, by the inherent microbes of sediments collected from 13.6 m in an atrazine-contaminated aquifer. Bioaugmentation without or with biostimulation had minor effects on atrazine degradation. The microbial number simultaneously increased in the slurries from 1.0 103 to 0.8–1.0 108 cfu mL 1, and in the circulating water from 0.1–1.0 102 to × × − × 0.24–8.8 104 cfu mL 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostimulation of Agricultural Biobeds with Npk Fertilizer on Chlorpyrifos Degradation to Avoid Soil and Water Contamination
    J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 10 (4): 464 - 475 (2010) BIOSTIMULATION OF AGRICULTURAL BIOBEDS WITH NPK FERTILIZER ON CHLORPYRIFOS DEGRADATION TO AVOID SOIL AND WATER CONTAMINATION G.R. Tortella1*, O. Rubilar1, M. Cea1, C. Wulff1, O. Martínez1, and M.C. Diez1,2 1Scientific and Technological Bioresource Nucleus, Universidad de La Frontera, PO Box 54-D Temuco, Chile. 2Chemical Engineering Department, Universidad de La Frontera, PO Box 54-D Temuco, Chile. *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Degradation of the insecticide chlorpyrifos (160 a.i mg kg-1) using a biomix of a biobed system biostimulated with inorganic fertilizer (NPK) was investigated. Three concentrations of the fertilizer (0.1%, 0.5% and 1.0% ww-1) were evaluated on chlorpyrifos degradation, TCP (3, 5, 6-trichloro-2-pyrinidol) accumulation and biological activity of the biomix. The chlorpyrifos was dissipated efficiently (>75%) after 40 days of incubation and no additional dissipation was obtained with increasing concentration of NPK after 20 days of incubation. TCP accumulation occurred in all evaluated NPK concentrations and its concentration increased with the increment of NPK addition raising the probability of leaching of this compound. Biological activity (FDA and ligninolytic enzyme activity) in the biomix increased by the NPK presence in all evaluated concentrations. The DGGE analyses showed that combined treatments with lower amounts of NPK (0% and 0.1%) and chlorpyrifos showed no significant modifications in the microbial community in the biomix. However, combined overdoses of NPK (0.5 and 1.0%) and chlorpyrifos caused significant modifications in the bacterial communities that could be associated with TCP degradation reduction in the biomix.
    [Show full text]