DOCSLIB.ORG

Coulomb's Law/Electric Fields I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coulomb's Law/Electric Fields I Chapter 3: Coulomb’s Law/Electric Fields I Chapter Learning Objectives: After completing this chapter the student will be able to: Use Coulomb’s Law to determine the force exerted by one electric charge on another. Determine the electric field surrounding a point charge. Determine the force on a charge due to an electric field. Use Superposition to determine the electric field due to multiple charges. You can watch the video associated with this chapter at the following link: Historical Perspective: Charles-Augustin de Coulomb performed pioneering work in electrostatics (and friction) in France in the late 1700s and early 1800s. Not only does he have a law named after him, but the fundamental unit of charge is also named the Coulomb. Photo credit: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Charles_de_coulomb.jpg, [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons. 1 3.1 Electric Charge “Charge” is a characteristic of matter associated with protons (which possess positive charge) and electrons (which possess negative charge). Nearly every phenomenon we will study in this book arises from the interactions of electrical charges. The fundamental SI unit for charge is the Coulomb, or C. A coulomb is a very large amount of charge! Considering that an electron and a proton both possess 1.602 x 10-19 C of charge, this means that one coulomb of charge contains 6.242 x 1018 individual electrons or protons. That is 6,242,000,000,000,000,000 or over 6 quintillion individual charges. A lighting strike, one of the most powerful and destructive naturally occurring electrical events, contains only about 10 to 20 coulombs of charge. 3.2 Electrical Forces and Coulomb’s Law There are only a handful of universal rules in this field, but one of them is this: Universal Rule #1: Electric charges always exert a force on each other. If the two charges have the same polarity (both positive or both negative), this force will repel them from each other. If the charges have opposite polarity (one positive and one negative), then the force will cause them to be attracted toward each other. The magnitude of the force is proportional to the magnitude of each charge and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them, as shown in Equation 3.1: (Equation 3.1) This equation, which is one of the most fundamental in all of electromagnetic fields, is named Coulomb’s Law. The constant 0 is referred to as the “permittivity of free space,” and its value is: (Equation 3.2) 2 You might wonder why the 4 is separated out rather than being combined into the new constant. I promise we’ll explain that in just a couple of chapters. The unit vector indicating the direction of the force is in the direction of the vector pointing from one charge to the other: (Equation 3.3) Here, r1 refers to the location of the charge that is “causing” the force, and r2 is the location of the charge that is “feeling” the force. This equation and the constant 0 are set up so that if the charges are in units of Coulombs, and if the distance between the points is in meters, then the force will be in Newtons. Example 3.1: What is the force exerted by charge B on charge A in the following figure? y (meters) A (2C) 5 B (-3C) 3 x (meters) 2 4 3 3.3 Electric Fields Coulomb’s Law can be a little bit difficult to work with, because there are four different quantities to keep track of—two charges and two locations. What would be more useful would be an equation or a quantity where we had some of the variables fixed and could investigate variations among the others. The electric field is a theoretical construct that allows us to do just this. In calculating the electric field, we temporarily remove the second charge (the one that “feels” the force), and we ask ourselves, “What would be the force on a theoretical charge if it were placed at every possible location around the first charge?” This is the definition of the electric field of the first charge, and it exists at all points in space. We can define the electric field caused by a fixed charge Q as being the force that would exist on a “test charge” q placed in the neighborhood of Q. By convention, we use a positive test charge. The electric field is defined to be the force on a positive test charge divided by the magnitude of the test charge. (Equation 3.4) Combining this definition of the electric field with Coulomb’s Law (Equation 3.1), we get the electric field surrounding a point charge: (Equation 3.5) The units of the electric field can be written as N/C or as V/m. We will find circumstances where each of these choices will be preferable. Because the charge Q is not moving, we refer to this as an “electrostatic” field. The next seven chapters will focus on different aspects of electrostatics. (Things get more complicated when the charges start to move.) Remember that we decided to use a positive test charge. This means that if the fixed charge is also positive, then the force will repel the test charge, which means the electric field will point away from a positive charge. Similarly, if the fixed charge is negative, it will attract a positive 4 test charge, which means that the electric fields will point toward a negative charge. This is shown in Figure 3.1. + - Figure 3.1. Electric field lines point away from positive charges and toward negative charges. If we want to be very fancy, we would say that electric fields “emanate” away from a positive charge and “terminate” on a negative charge. We could (and do) also say that positive charges are a “source” of electric fields, while negative charges are a “sink” of electric fields. Example 3.2: A fixed charge of +3C is located at (2,0). What is the function E(x,y) for the electric field at all points in the (x,y) plane? Example 3.3: Given the situation in Example 3.2, what is the electric field at the origin? 5 Example 3.4: Given the situation in Examples 3.2 and 3.3, what would be the force on a charge of -4C located at the origin? 3.4 Superposition of Electric Fields Electric fields obey superposition, which means that if there are multiple charges near a point, you can calculate the total electric field at a given point by calculating the electric fields due to each charge and then adding them together. Of course, electric fields are vector quantities, so you must use vector addition. Superposition of electric fields is defined mathematically in equation 3.6: (Equation 3.6) Example 3.5: A charge of +4mC is located at (-3,0), and a charge of -3mC is located at (+4,0). Use superposition to determine the electric field at the origin. What is the force on a charge of +2C at the origin? 6 Example 3.6: Three charges, each of +1C, are located at three corners of a square: (-3,-3), (-3, +3), and (+3, -3). What is the electric field at the fourth corner (+3, +3)? What is the force on a charge of +1nC at (+3,+3)? Example 3.7: Superposition can also be analyzed using sketches of electric field lines, which always begin on positive charges and end on negative charges. An “electric dipole” includes one positive and one negative charge, typically of equal magnitude. Sketch the electric field lines associated with the following electric dipole: + - 7 3.5 Summary Universal Rule #1: Electric charges always exert a force on each other. Coulomb’s Law specifies the magnitude and direction of the force caused by one electric charge on another electric charge. The electric field removes one of the two charges and answers the question, “What would be the force on a conceptual positive charge caused by the fixed charge that remains?” Electric fields point away from positive charges and toward negative charges. Electric fields obey superposition: the electric field at a given point can be calculated as the sum of the electric fields due to all surrounding charges. 8 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lorentz Force
    CLASSICAL CONCEPT REVIEW 14 The Lorentz Force We can find empirically that a particle with mass m and electric charge q in an elec- tric field E experiences a force FE given by FE = q E LF-1 It is apparent from Equation LF-1 that, if q is a positive charge (e.g., a proton), FE is parallel to, that is, in the direction of E and if q is a negative charge (e.g., an electron), FE is antiparallel to, that is, opposite to the direction of E (see Figure LF-1). A posi- tive charge moving parallel to E or a negative charge moving antiparallel to E is, in the absence of other forces of significance, accelerated according to Newton’s second law: q F q E m a a E LF-2 E = = 1 = m Equation LF-2 is, of course, not relativistically correct. The relativistically correct force is given by d g mu u2 -3 2 du u2 -3 2 FE = q E = = m 1 - = m 1 - a LF-3 dt c2 > dt c2 > 1 2 a b a b 3 Classically, for example, suppose a proton initially moving at v0 = 10 m s enters a region of uniform electric field of magnitude E = 500 V m antiparallel to the direction of E (see Figure LF-2a). How far does it travel before coming (instanta> - neously) to rest? From Equation LF-2 the acceleration slowing the proton> is q 1.60 * 10-19 C 500 V m a = - E = - = -4.79 * 1010 m s2 m 1.67 * 10-27 kg 1 2 1 > 2 E > The distance Dx traveled by the proton until it comes to rest with vf 0 is given by FE • –q +q • FE 2 2 3 2 vf - v0 0 - 10 m s Dx = = 2a 2 4.79 1010 m s2 - 1* > 2 1 > 2 Dx 1.04 10-5 m 1.04 10-3 cm Ϸ 0.01 mm = * = * LF-1 A positively charged particle in an electric field experiences a If the same proton is injected into the field perpendicular to E (or at some angle force in the direction of the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Physics Unit 15: Nuclear Structure and Decay Lecture 15.1: Nuclear Characteristics
    Modern Physics Unit 15: Nuclear Structure and Decay Lecture 15.1: Nuclear Characteristics Ron Reifenberger Professor of Physics Purdue University 1 Nucleons - the basic building blocks of the nucleus Also written as: 7 3 Li ~10-15 m Examples: A X=Chemical Element Z X Z = number of protons = atomic number 12 A = atomic mass number = Z+N 6 C N= A-Z = number of neutrons 35 17 Cl 2 What is the size of a nucleus? Three possibilities • Range of nuclear force? • Mass radius? • Charge radius? It turns out that for nuclear matter Nuclear force radius ≈ mass radius ≈ charge radius defines nuclear force range defines nuclear surface 3 Nuclear Charge Density The size of the lighter nuclei can be approximated by modeling the nuclear charge density ρ (C/m3): t ≈ 4.4a; a=0.54 fm 90% 10% Usually infer the best values for ρo, R and a for a given nucleus from scattering experiments 4 Nuclear mass density Scattering experiments indicate the nucleus is roughly spherical with a radius given by 1 3 −15 R = RRooA ; =1.07 × 10meters= 1.07 fm = 1.07 fermis A=atomic mass number What is the nuclear mass density of the most common isotope of iron? 56 26 Fe⇒= A56; Z = 26, N = 30 m Am⋅⋅3 Am 33A ⋅ m m ρ = nuc p= p= pp = o 1 33 VR4 3 3 3 44ππA R nuc π R 4(π RAo ) o o 3 3×× 1.66 10−27 kg = 3.2× 1017kg / m 3 4×× 3.14 (1.07 × 10−15m ) 3 The mass density is constant, independent of A! 5 Nuclear mass density for 27Al, 97Mo, 238U (from scattering experiments) (kg/m3) ρo heavy mass nucleus light mass nucleus middle mass nucleus 6 Typical Densities Material Density Helium 0.18 kg/m3 Air (dry) 1.2 kg/m3 Styrofoam ~100 kg/m3 Water 1000 kg/m3 Iron 7870 kg/m3 Lead 11,340 kg/m3 17 3 Nuclear Matter ~10 kg/m 7 Isotopes - same chemical element but different mass (J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacitance and Dielectrics Capacitance
    Capacitance and Dielectrics Capacitance General Definition: C === q /V Special case for parallel plates: εεε A C === 0 d Potential Energy • I must do work to charge up a capacitor. • This energy is stored in the form of electric potential energy. Q2 • We showed that this is U === 2C • Then we saw that this energy is stored in the electric field, with a volume energy density 1 2 u === 2 εεε0 E Potential difference and Electric field Since potential difference is work per unit charge, b ∆∆∆V === Edx ∫∫∫a For the parallel-plate capacitor E is uniform, so V === Ed Also for parallel-plate case Gauss’s Law gives Q Q εεε0 A E === σσσ /εεε0 === === Vd so C === === εεε0 A V d Spherical example A spherical capacitor has inner radius a = 3mm, outer radius b = 6mm. The charge on the inner sphere is q = 2 C. What is the potential difference? kq From Gauss’s Law or the Shell E === Theorem, the field inside is r 2 From definition of b kq 1 1 V === dr === kq −−− potential difference 2 ∫∫∫a r a b 1 1 1 1 === 9 ×××109 ××× 2 ×××10−−−9 −−− === 18 ×××103 −−− === 3 ×××103 V −−−3 −−−3 3 ×××10 6 ×××10 3 6 What is the capacitance? C === Q /V === 2( C) /(3000V ) === 7.6 ×××10−−−4 F A capacitor has capacitance C = 6 µF and charge Q = 2 nC. If the charge is Q.25-1 increased to 4 nC what will be the new capacitance? (1) 3 µF (2) 6 µF (3) 12 µF (4) 24 µF Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Units and Magnitudes (Lecture Notes)
    physics 8.701 topic 2 Frank Wilczek Units and Magnitudes (lecture notes) This lecture has two parts. The first part is mainly a practical guide to the measurement units that dominate the particle physics literature, and culture. The second part is a quasi-philosophical discussion of deep issues around unit systems, including a comparison of atomic, particle ("strong") and Planck units. For a more extended, profound treatment of the second part issues, see arxiv.org/pdf/0708.4361v1.pdf . Because special relativity and quantum mechanics permeate modern particle physics, it is useful to employ units so that c = ħ = 1. In other words, we report velocities as multiples the speed of light c, and actions (or equivalently angular momenta) as multiples of the rationalized Planck's constant ħ, which is the original Planck constant h divided by 2π. 27 August 2013 physics 8.701 topic 2 Frank Wilczek In classical physics one usually keeps separate units for mass, length and time. I invite you to think about why! (I'll give you my take on it later.) To bring out the "dimensional" features of particle physics units without excess baggage, it is helpful to keep track of powers of mass M, length L, and time T without regard to magnitudes, in the form When these are both set equal to 1, the M, L, T system collapses to just one independent dimension. So we can - and usually do - consider everything as having the units of some power of mass. Thus for energy we have while for momentum 27 August 2013 physics 8.701 topic 2 Frank Wilczek and for length so that energy and momentum have the units of mass, while length has the units of inverse mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Vibration Using Sound Level Meter Nor140
    Application Note Measuring vibration using sound level meter Nor140 This technical note describes the use of the sound level meter Nor140 for measurement of acceleration levels. The normal microphone is then substituted by an accelerometer. The note also describes calibration and the relation between the level in decibel and the acceleration in linear units. AN Vibration Ed2Rev0 English 03.08 AN Vibration Ed2Rev0 English 03.08 Introduction Accelerometer Most sound level meters and sound analysers can be used for Many types of acceleration sensitive sensors exist. For vibration measurements, even if they do not provide absolute connection to Nor140 sound level meter the easiest is to (linear) units in the display. To simplify the description, this ap- apply an ICP® or CCP type. This type of transducers has low plication note describes the use of the handheld sound level output impedance and may be supplied through a coaxial meter Norsonic Nor140. However, the described principles able. Nor1270 (Sens. 10 mV/ms-2; 23 g) and Nor1271 (Sens. also apply to other types of sound level meters. 1,0 mV/ms-2; 3,5 g) are recommended. Connect the accelero- Although several transducer principles are commercially meter through the BNC/Lemo cable Nor1438 and the BNC to available, this application note will deal with the accelerometer microdot adaptor Nor1466. You also need a BNC-BNC female only, simply because it is the transducer type most commonly connector. See the figure below. encountered when measuring vibration levels. As the name Alternatively, a charge sensitive accelerometer may be suggests, the accelerometer measures the acceleration it is used and coupled to the normal microphone preamplifier exposed to and provides an output signal proportional to the Nor1209 through the adapter with BNC input Nor1447/2 and instant acceleration.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nature of Electric Charge
    Vol. 9(4), pp. 54-60, 28 February, 2014 DOI: 10.5897/IJPS2013.4091 ISSN 1992 - 1950 International Journal of Physical Copyright © 2014 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article Sciences http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS Full Length Research Paper On the nature of electric charge Jafari Najafi, Mahdi 1730 N Lynn ST apt A35, Arlington, VA 22209 USA. Received 10 December, 2013; Accepted 14 February, 2014 A few hundred years have passed since the discovery of electricity and electromagnetic fields, formulating them as Maxwell's equations, but the nature of an electric charge remains unknown. Why do particles with the same charge repel and opposing charges attract? Is the electric charge a primary intrinsic property of a particle? These questions cannot be answered until the nature of the electric charge is identified. The present study provides an explicit description of the gravitational constant G and the origin of electric charge will be inferred using generalized dimensional analysis. Key words: Electric charge, gravitational constant, dimensional analysis, particle mass change. INTRODUCTION The universe is composed of three basic elements; parameters. This approach is of great generality and mass-energy (M), length (L), and time (T). Intrinsic mathematical simplicity that simply and directly properties are assigned to particles, including mass, postulates a hypothesis for the nature of the electric electric charge, and spin, and their effects are applied in charge. Although the final formula is a guesswork based the form of physical formulas that explicitly address on dimensional analysis of electric charges, it shows the physical phenomena. The meaning of some particle existence of consistency between the final formula and properties remains opaque.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
    Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Optical Metamaterials with Strong Spatial Dispersion
    Fakultät für Physik Institut für theoretische Festkörperphysik Modeling Optical Metamaterials with Strong Spatial Dispersion M. Sc. Karim Mnasri von der KIT-Fakultät für Physik des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (KIT) genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTORS DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (Dr. rer. nat.) Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29. November 2019 Referent: Prof. Dr. Carsten Rockstuhl (Institut für theoretische Festkörperphysik) Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Michael Plum (Institut für Analysis) KIT – Die Forschungsuniversität in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Erklärung zur Selbstständigkeit Ich versichere, dass ich diese Arbeit selbstständig verfasst habe und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt habe, die wörtlich oder inhaltlich über- nommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht und die Satzung des KIT zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis in der gültigen Fassung vom 24. Mai 2018 beachtet habe. Karlsruhe, den 21. Oktober 2019, Karim Mnasri Als Prüfungsexemplar genehmigt von Karlsruhe, den 28. Oktober 2019, Prof. Dr. Carsten Rockstuhl iv To Ouiem and Adam Thesis abstract Optical metamaterials are artificial media made from subwavelength inclusions with un- conventional properties at optical frequencies. While a response to the magnetic field of light in natural material is absent, metamaterials prompt to lift this limitation and to exhibit a response to both electric and magnetic fields at optical frequencies. Due tothe interplay of both the actual shape of the inclusions and the material from which they are made, but also from the specific details of their arrangement, the response canbe driven to one or multiple resonances within a desired frequency band. With such a high number of degrees of freedom, tedious trial-and-error simulations and costly experimen- tal essays are inefficient when considering optical metamaterials in the design of specific applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetism
    Electromagnetism Electric Charge Two types: positive and negative Like charges repel, opposites attract Forces come in a matched pair Each charge pushes or pulls on the other Forces have equal magnitudes and opposite directions Forces increase with decreasing separation Charge is quantized Charge is an intrinsic property of matter Electrons are negatively charged (-1.6 x 10-19 coulomb’s each) Protons are positively charged (+1.6 x 10-19 coulomb’s each) Net charge is the sum of an object’s charges Most objects have zero net charge (neutral – equal numbers of + and -) Electric Fields Charges push on each other through empty space Charge one creates an “electric field” This electric field pushes on charge two An electric field is a structure in space that pushes on electric charge The magnitude of the field is proportional to the magnitude of the force on a test charge The direction of the field is the direction of the force on a positive test charge Magnetic Poles Two Types: north and south Like poles repel, opposites attract Forces come in matched pairs Forces increase with decreasing separation Analogous to electric charges EXCEPT: No isolated magnetic poles have ever been found! Net pole on an object is always zero! Most atoms are magnetic, but most materials are not Atomic magnetism is perfectly cancelled Material is indifferent to nearby magnetic poles Some materials do not have full cancellation Ferromagnetic materials respond to magnetic poles Magnetic Fields A magnetic field is a structure in space that pushes on magnetic poles
    [Show full text]
  • F = BIL (F=Force, B=Magnetic Field, I=Current, L=Length of Conductor)
    Magnetism Joanna Radov Vocab: -Armature- is the power producing part of a motor -Domain- is a region in which the magnetic field of atoms are grouped together and aligned -Electric Motor- converts electrical energy into mechanical energy -Electromagnet- is a type of magnet whose magnetic field is produced by an electric current -First Right-Hand Rule (delete) -Fixed Magnet- is an object made from a magnetic material and creates a persistent magnetic field -Galvanometer- type of ammeter- detects and measures electric current -Magnetic Field- is a field of force produced by moving electric charges, by electric fields that vary in time, and by the 'intrinsic' magnetic field of elementary particles associated with the spin of the particle. -Magnetic Flux- is a measure of the amount of magnetic B field passing through a given surface -Polarized- when a magnet is permanently charged -Second Hand-Right Rule- (delete) -Solenoid- is a coil wound into a tightly packed helix -Third Right-Hand Rule- (delete) Major Points: -Similar magnetic poles repel each other, whereas opposite poles attract each other -Magnets exert a force on current-carrying wires -An electric charge produces an electric field in the region of space around the charge and that this field exerts a force on other electric charges placed in the field -The source of a magnetic field is moving charge, and the effect of a magnetic field is to exert a force on other moving charge placed in the field -The magnetic field is a vector quantity -We denote the magnetic field by the symbol B and represent it graphically by field lines -These lines are drawn ⊥ to their entry and exit points -They travel from N to S -If a stationary test charge is placed in a magnetic field, then the charge experiences no force.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity and Coulomb's
    Gravity operates by the inverse square law (source Hyperphysics) A main objective in this lesson is that you understand the basic notion of “inverse square” relationships. There are a small number (perhaps less than 25) general paradigms of nature that if you make them part of your basic view of nature they will help you greatly in your understanding of how nature operates. Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental forces, yet it is the dominant force in the universe for shaping the large-scale structure of galaxies, stars, etc. The gravitational force between two masses m1 and m2 is given by the relationship: This is often called the "universal law of gravitation" and G the universal gravitation constant. It is an example of an inverse square law force. The force is always attractive and acts along the line joining the centers of mass of the two masses. The forces on the two masses are equal in size but opposite in direction, obeying Newton's third law. You should notice that the universal gravitational constant is REALLY small so gravity is considered a very weak force. The gravity force has the same form as Coulomb's law for the forces between electric charges, i.e., it is an inverse square law force which depends upon the product of the two interacting sources. This led Einstein to start with the electromagnetic force and gravity as the first attempt to demonstrate the unification of the fundamental forces. It turns out that this was the wrong place to start, and that gravity will be the last of the forces to unify with the other three forces.
    [Show full text]
  • S.I. and Cgs Units
    Some Notes on SI vs. cgs Units by Jason Harlow Last updated Feb. 8, 2011 by Jason Harlow. Introduction Within “The Metric System”, there are actually two separate self-consistent systems. One is the Systme International or SI system, which uses Metres, Kilograms and Seconds for length, mass and time. For this reason it is sometimes called the MKS system. The other system uses centimetres, grams and seconds for length, mass and time. It is most often called the cgs system, and sometimes it is called the Gaussian system or the electrostatic system. Each system has its own set of derived units for force, energy, electric current, etc. Surprisingly, there are important differences in the basic equations of electrodynamics depending on which system you are using! Important textbooks such as Classical Electrodynamics 3e by J.D. Jackson ©1998 by Wiley and Classical Electrodynamics 2e by Hans C. Ohanian ©2006 by Jones & Bartlett use the cgs system in all their presentation and derivations of basic electric and magnetic equations. I think many theorists prefer this system because the equations look “cleaner”. Introduction to Electrodynamics 3e by David J. Griffiths ©1999 by Benjamin Cummings uses the SI system. Here are some examples of units you may encounter, the relevant facts about them, and how they relate to the SI and cgs systems: Force The SI unit for force comes from Newton’s 2nd law, F = ma, and is the Newton or N. 1 N = 1 kg·m/s2. The cgs unit for force comes from the same equation and is called the dyne, or dyn.
    [Show full text]