DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Article (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Article (PDF) United Nations Decade on Biodiversity Occasional Paper No. 341 W~ThrfM ~fu\&~~DIF~ CG~®if~~~~0~ Occasional Paper No. 341 Vertebrate (Birds and Mammals) Faunal Composition of H adgarh Wildlife Sanctuary Orissa Atindra M urmu , P.C. M azumdar and s. C haudhuri Zoological Survey of India Kolkata ii Rec. Zool. Surv. India, Occ. Paper No. 341 CITATION Alindra Murmu, Mazumdar P.e. & Chaudhuri 5.,2013. Vertebrate (Birds and Mammals) Faunal Composition of Hadgarh WLs. Rec. zool. Surv. India, Oce. Paper No. 341: 1-56 (Published by the Director, Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata) Published :January, 2013 ISBN : 978-81-8171-318-6 ©Govt. of India, 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechnical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed off without the publisher's consent, in a form of binding or cover other than that in which, it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page. Any revised price indicated by a rubber stamp or by a sticker or by any other means is incor­ rect and should be unacceptable. Price I ndia ~ 325/­ Foreign $ 25/ - £ 20/ - Published at the Publication Division, by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, M - Block, New Alipore, Kolkata - 700053 and printed at Deep Printers, 70A, Rama Road, Industrial Area, New Delhi - 110015. M urmu et al.: Vertibrate Fauna Composition of H adgarh WLS iii Vertibrate (Birds and Mammals) Faunal Composition of Hadgarh Wildlife Sanctuary (Orissa) Occasional Paper No. 341 2013 Page 1-56 CONTENTS 1. I NTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................1 2. PHYSICAL FEATURES .............................................................................................................. 1 3. CLIMATE ...............................................................................................................................2 4. FLORA ....................................................................................................................................2 5. METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................3 6. FAUNAL COMPOSITION .........................................................................................................3 7. ABBREVIATION ...................................................................................................................3 8. SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT .......................................................................................................4 8.1. C I ass-M ammal i a............................................................................................................... 4 Order-I nsectivora ..............................................................................................................4 o rder-Scadanti a ..............................................................................................................4 Order-Chiroptera ..............................................................................................................4 Order-Pri mates .....................................................................................................................6 Order-Carnivora ..................................................................................................................6 Order-Proboscidea ..............................................................................................................9 Order-Artiodactyla ..............................................................................................................9 Order-Pholidota .............................................................................................................. 10 Order-Rodentia .............................................................................................................. 10 Order-Lagomorpha ............................................................................................................ 12 8.2. CLAS5-AVES ....................................................................................................................... 12 Order-Podicipediformes .................................................................................................. 12 Order-Pelecaniformes...................................................................................................... 13 Order-Ciconiformes.......................................................................................................... 13 Order-Anceriformes........................................................................................................ 14 Order-Falconiformes........................................................................................................ 15 Order-Galliformes.............................................................................................................. 17 Order-Gruiformes............................................................................................................ 18 Order-Charadriformes...................................................................................................... 18 iv Order-Columbiformes.................................................................................................. 20 Order-Psittaciformes.................................................................................................. 21 Order-Cucul iformes.................................................................................................. 22 Order-Strigiformes.................................................................................................. 23 Order-Capri mulgiformes.................................................................................................. 24 Order-A podiformes.................................................................................................. 25 Order-Trogoniformes.................................................................................................. 25 Order-Coraciiformes.................................................................................................. 25 Order-Piciformes.................................................................................................. 27 Order-Passeriformes.................................................................................................. 28 9. DISCUSSION ..............................................................................................................44 10. RECOMMENDATION .....................................................................................................45 11. SUMMARy .............................................................................................................46 12. ACKN OWLEDGEM ENTS .................................................................................................46 13. REFEREN CES .........................................................................................................46 M urmu et al. : Vertebrate Fau nal Composition of H adgarh W LS 1 INTRODUCTION H adgarh Wildlife Sanctuary is located in Keonjhar and M ayurbhanj districtsof Orissa and lies between 21°121 to 21°231 N latitude and 86°12130 1 to 86°211301 E longitude. It was declared as a Sanctuary in the year 1978 with a total area of 191.6 km2 of which 116.514 km2 belong to Boula Reserve Forest of Keonjhar district and rest 75.086 km2 belong to part of Satkosia Reserve Forest of M ayurbhanj district. The Boula hill ranges are extensions of Simlipal hill of Mayurbhanj district. The landscape with miscellaneous vegetations and smaller hills contains variety of flora and the impenetrable dense cover provides very good shelter and breeding ground for wildlife. Other ecological zones have also given rise to a rich and diversified fauna. As no detailed information is available on the fauna composition of this sanctuary, Zoological Survey of I ndia took up this project as a part of the exploration of fauna of conservation areas programme and conducted a number of faunastic surveys during the year 2007 to 2009 in this area. During this survey attempts were made to identify the existing faunal composition along with ecological data, population trend and factors affecting them. For this purpose in addition to systematic field observations, necessary discussions with the management people and local people were made. In the present paper, an accountofthefaunal composition with special reference to mammals and birdsof H adgarh Wildlife Sanctuary along with the ecologi cal conditions have been given. PHYSICAL FEATURES H adgarh Wildlife Sanctuary falls within the Bio geographic zone of Decan Peninsula and within the Bio-geographic province of Chota Nagpur Plateau. The sanctuary falls within M ahanadian Bio-geographic region. Accordingto geological stratographic classification the sanctuary falls within the Boula­ N uasahi hi Ily region and exhi bits extensive occurrence of quartzite and quartzschist on both sides of Salandi River. Boula and N uasahi chromitedepositsarefound in association with peridolite and Serpentinties and are having 9SOio of the total chromite reserve of the country. The sanctuary forms a part of the Eastern G hats group of rocks havi ng i ron ore of tertiary origin. This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bhadra Voluntary Relocation India
    BHADRA VOLUNTARY RELOCATION INDIA INDIA FOREWORD During my tenure as Director Project Tiger in the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India, I had the privilege of participating in voluntary relocation of villages from Bhadra Tiger Reserve. As nearly two decades have passed, whatever is written below is from my memory only. Mr Yatish Kumar was the Field Director of Bhadra Tiger Reserve and Mr Gopalakrishne Gowda was the Collector of Chikmagalur District of Karnataka during voluntary relocation in Bhadra Tiger Reserve. This Sanctuary was notified as a Tiger Reserve in the year 1998. After the notification as tiger reserve, it was necessary to relocate the existing villages as the entire population with their cattle were dependent on the Tiger Reserve. The area which I saw in the year 1998 was very rich in flora and fauna. Excellent bamboo forests were available but it had fire hazard too because of the presence of villagers and their cattle. Tiger population was estimated by Dr. Ullas Karanth and his love for this area was due to highly rich biodiversity. Ultimately, resulted in relocation of all the villages from within the reserve. Dr Karanth, a devoted biologist was a close friend of mine and during his visit to Delhi he proposed relocation of villages. As the Director of Project Tiger, I was looking at voluntary relocation of villages for tribals only from inside Tiger Reserve by de-notifying suitable areas of forests for relocation, but in this case the villagers were to be relocated by purchasing a revenue land which was very expensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Life Sanctuaries in INDIA
    A M K RESOURCE WORLD GENERAL KNOWLEDGE www.amkresourceinfo.com Wild Life Sanctuaries in INDIA Wildlife Sanctuaries in India are 441 in number. They are a home to hundreds and thousands of various flora and fauna. A wide variety of species thrive in such Wildlife Sanctuaries. With the ever growing cement – jungle, it is of utmost importance to protect and conserve wildlife and give them their own, natural space to survive Wildlife Sanctuaries are established by IUCN category II protected areas. A wildlife sanctuary is a place of refuge where abused, injured, endangered animals live in peace and dignity. Senchal Game Sanctuary. Established in 1915 is the oldest of such sanctuaries in India. Chal Batohi, in Gujarat is the largest Wildlife Sanctuary in India. The conservative measures taken by the Indian Government for the conservation of Tigers was awarded by a 30% rise in the number of tigers in 2015. According to the Red Data Book of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), there are 47 critically endangered species in India. DO YOU KNOW? Wildlife sanctuaries in India are established by IUCN category II protected areas. India has 537 wildlife sanctuaries referred to as wildlife sanctuaries category IV protected areas. Among these, the 50 tiger reserves are governed by Project Tiger, and are of special significance in the conservation of the tiger. Some wildlife sanctuaries in India are specifically named bird sanctuary, e.g., Keoladeo National Park before attaining National Park status. Many of them being referred as as a particular animal such as Jawai leopard sanctuary in Rajasthan.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats & Sri Lanka Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile WESTERN GHATS & SRI LANKA BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT WESTERN GHATS REGION FINAL VERSION MAY 2007 Prepared by: Kamal S. Bawa, Arundhati Das and Jagdish Krishnaswamy (Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology & the Environment - ATREE) K. Ullas Karanth, N. Samba Kumar and Madhu Rao (Wildlife Conservation Society) in collaboration with: Praveen Bhargav, Wildlife First K.N. Ganeshaiah, University of Agricultural Sciences Srinivas V., Foundation for Ecological Research, Advocacy and Learning incorporating contributions from: Narayani Barve, ATREE Sham Davande, ATREE Balanchandra Hegde, Sahyadri Wildlife and Forest Conservation Trust N.M. Ishwar, Wildlife Institute of India Zafar-ul Islam, Indian Bird Conservation Network Niren Jain, Kudremukh Wildlife Foundation Jayant Kulkarni, Envirosearch S. Lele, Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Environment & Development M.D. Madhusudan, Nature Conservation Foundation Nandita Mahadev, University of Agricultural Sciences Kiran M.C., ATREE Prachi Mehta, Envirosearch Divya Mudappa, Nature Conservation Foundation Seema Purshothaman, ATREE Roopali Raghavan, ATREE T. R. Shankar Raman, Nature Conservation Foundation Sharmishta Sarkar, ATREE Mohammed Irfan Ullah, ATREE and with the technical support of: Conservation International-Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Assisted by the following experts and contributors: Rauf Ali Gladwin Joseph Uma Shaanker Rene Borges R. Kannan B. Siddharthan Jake Brunner Ajith Kumar C.S. Silori ii Milind Bunyan M.S.R. Murthy Mewa Singh Ravi Chellam Venkat Narayana H. Sudarshan B.A. Daniel T.S. Nayar R. Sukumar Ranjit Daniels Rohan Pethiyagoda R. Vasudeva Soubadra Devy Narendra Prasad K. Vasudevan P. Dharma Rajan M.K. Prasad Muthu Velautham P.S. Easa Asad Rahmani Arun Venkatraman Madhav Gadgil S.N. Rai Siddharth Yadav T. Ganesh Pratim Roy Santosh George P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Snow Leopard
    PROJECT SNOW LEOPARD Ministry of Environment and Forests PROJECT SNOW LEOPARD Ministry of Environment and Forests CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Project Justification 5 3. Project Objectives 11 4. Project Areas 15 4.1. Criteria for determining landscapes 18 5. Broad management principles 19 5.1. Management approach 21 5.2. Management initiatives 22 5.3. Strategy for reaching out 24 5.4. Research 24 6. Indicative Activities under Project 27 7. Administration 31 8. Financial Implications 35 9. Conclusion 37 10. Time-lines 39 11. Annexures 41 1. Details of the Project Snow Leopard, Drafting Committee instituted by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, (vide Notification No. F.No., 15/5/2006 WL I, Dated 31 July 2006) 41 2. Recommendations of the National Workshop on ‘Project Snow Leopard’ held on 11-12 July, 2006 at Leh-Ladakh 42 3. Known protected areas in the Indian high altitudes (including the Trans-Himalaya and Greater Himalaya) with potential for snow leopard occurrence (Rodgers et al. 2000, WII Database and inputs from the respective Forest/Wildlife Departments). 43 4. List of PAs in the Five Himalayan States. PAs in the snow leopard range are seperately iden tified (based on WII Database and inputs from state Forest/Wildlife Departments) 44 12. Activity Flow chart 48 FOREWORD The Indian Himalaya have numerous unique ecosystems hidden within, which house rich biodiversity including a wealth of medicinal plants, globally important wildlife, besides providing ecological, aesthetic, spiritual and economic services. A significant proportion of these values is provided by high altitude areas located above the forests – the alpine meadows and the apparently bleak cold deserts beyond, an area typified by the mystical apex predator, the snow leopard, which presides over the stark landscape inhabited by its prey including a variety of wild sheep and goats.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivores of Karnataka: Distribution and Sight Records1
    Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 104 (2), May-Aug 2007 155-162 SMALL CARNIVORES OF KARNATAKA SMALL CARNIVORES OF KARNATAKA: DISTRIBUTION AND SIGHT RECORDS1 H.N. KUMARA2,3 AND MEWA SINGH2,4 1Accepted November 2006 2 Biopsychology Laboratory, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, Karnataka, India. 3Email: [email protected] 4Email: [email protected] During a study from November 2001 to July 2004 on ecology and status of wild mammals in Karnataka, we sighted 143 animals belonging to 11 species of small carnivores of about 17 species that are expected to occur in the state of Karnataka. The sighted species included Leopard Cat, Rustyspotted Cat, Jungle Cat, Small Indian Civet, Asian Palm Civet, Brown Palm Civet, Common Mongoose, Ruddy Mongoose, Stripe-necked Mongoose and unidentified species of Otters. Malabar Civet, Fishing Cat, Brown Mongoose, Nilgiri Marten, and Ratel were not sighted during this study. The Western Ghats alone account for thirteen species of small carnivores of which six are endemic. The sighting of Rustyspotted Cat is the first report from Karnataka. Habitat loss and hunting are the major threats for the small carnivore survival in nature. The Small Indian Civet is exploited for commercial purpose. Hunting technique varies from guns to specially devised traps, and hunting of all the small carnivore species is common in the State. Key words: Felidae, Viverridae, Herpestidae, Mustelidae, Karnataka, threats INTRODUCTION (Mukherjee 1989; Mudappa 2001; Rajamani et al. 2003; Mukherjee et al. 2004). Other than these studies, most of the Mammals of the families Felidae, Viverridae, information on these animals comes from anecdotes or sight Herpestidae, Mustelidae and Procyonidae are generally records, which no doubt, have significantly contributed in called small carnivores.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    United Nations O~". on 8Io4'~I'I[t)' OCCA 10 AL PAP R o. 344 . of the 00 gic rveyof Mamma and Avi-Fauna of Kuld eha Wi dlife Sane uary, Orissa ATINDRA MURMU P.C.MAZUM s. CHAUDHURI Zoo oglea Su v y 0_I ia Occasional Paper No. 344 Mammal and Avi-Fauna of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, Orissa Atindra Murmu, P.C. Mazumdar and s. Chaudhuri Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata - 700053 Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Atindra Murmu, P C Mazumdar and S. Chaudhuri, 2013. Mammal and Avi-Fauna of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, Orissa, Occ. Paper No. 334: 1-51. (Published by the Director, Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata) Published: July, 2013 ISBN 978-81-8171-341-4 © Government of India, 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a rebieval system of transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that is shall not, by way of trade, be lent, re-sold hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in any form of binding or cover other then in which it is published. • The correct price of this publication in the price printed on this page. Any revised price indicated by a rubber stamp or by a sticker or by any other means is incorrect and shoud be unacceptable. PRICE India : f 350.00 Foreign: $ 20; £ 15 Published at the Publication Division by the Director, Zoological Survay of India, M-Block, New AIipore, Koikata - 700 053 and printed at Hooghly Printing Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Important National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries of India
    -Important National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries of India- Wildlife Sanctuaries & National Parks are high-security natural areas created to conserve and protect animals/other conservation-reliant species from poachers. 1 National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries of India Volume 1 (2016) In the following eBook we have compiled a list of important National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries of India. It is essential that you know the list of National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries as questions on these are among the most commonly asked questions in the General Awareness sections of competitive Banking and Insurance Exams such as RBI, IBPS, SBI, etc. You can expect 1-2 questions from National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in the General Awareness section of the above mentioned exams. Below is a sample of the kind of questions you will be asked in the exam: 1. The Hemis National Park is situated in which state? a. Assam b. Odisha c. Jammu & Kashmir d. Jharkhand e. Uttarakhand Answer: C The following eBook will help you learn the names of Wildlife Sanctuaries and National Parks and score better. 2 www.oliveboard.in National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries of India Volume 1 (2016) List of State-wise National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries in India Andaman and Nicobar Islands Sr. No Name Category 1 Barren Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 2 Battimalve Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 3 Bluff Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 4 Bondoville Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 5 Buchaan Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Sundarbans Mangrove Forest
    Biological Conservation 251 (2020) 108751 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Review Indian Sundarbans mangrove forest considered endangered under Red List T of Ecosystems, but there is cause for optimism ⁎ Michael Sieversa, , Mahua Roy Chowdhuryb, Maria Fernanda Adamea,c, Punyasloke Bhaduryd, Radhika Bhargavae, Christina Buelowa, Daniel A. Friesse, Anwesha Ghoshd, Matthew A. Hayesa, Eva C. McClurea, Ryan M. Pearsona, Mischa P. Turschwellc, Thomas A. Worthingtonf, Rod M. Connollya a Australian Rivers Institute – Coast and Estuaries, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia b Department of Marine Science, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700 019, India c Australian Rivers Institute – Coast and Estuaries, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia d Centre for Climate and Environmental Studies and Integrative Taxonomy and Microbial Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, 741246, Nadia, West Bengal, India e Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, 117570, Singapore f Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Accurately evaluating ecosystem status is vital for effective conservation. The Red List of Ecosystems (RLE) from Ecosystem condition the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) is the global standard for assessing the risk of Ecosystem integrity ecosystem collapse. Such tools are particularly needed for large, dynamic ecosystem complexes, such as the Ecosystem risk assessment Indian Sundarbans mangrove forest. This ecosystem supports unique biodiversity and the livelihoods of millions, Habitat assessment but like many mangrove forests around the world is facing substantial pressure from a range of human activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats
    Western Ghats From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "Sahyadri" redirects here. For other uses, see Sahyadri (disambiguation). Western Ghats Sahyadri सहहदररद Western Ghats as seen from Gobichettipalayam, Tamil Nadu Highest point Peak Anamudi (Eravikulam National Park) Elevation 2,695 m (8,842 ft) Coordinates 10°10′N 77°04′E Coordinates: 10°10′N 77°04′E Dimensions Length 1,600 km (990 mi) N–S Width 100 km (62 mi) E–W Area 160,000 km2 (62,000 sq mi) Geography The Western Ghats lie roughly parallel to the west coast of India Country India States List[show] Settlements List[show] Biome Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests Geology Period Cenozoic Type of rock Basalt and Laterite UNESCO World Heritage Site Official name: Natural Properties - Western Ghats (India) Type Natural Criteria ix, x Designated 2012 (36th session) Reference no. 1342 State Party India Region Indian subcontinent The Western Ghats are a mountain range that runs almost parallel to the western coast of the Indian peninsula, located entirely in India. It is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and is one of the eight "hottest hotspots" of biological diversity in the world.[1][2] It is sometimes called the Great Escarpment of India.[3] The range runs north to south along the western edge of the Deccan Plateau, and separates the plateau from a narrow coastal plain, called Konkan, along the Arabian Sea. A total of thirty nine properties including national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and reserve forests were designated as world heritage sites - twenty in Kerala, ten in Karnataka, five in Tamil Nadu and four in Maharashtra.[4][5] The range starts near the border of Gujarat and Maharashtra, south of the Tapti river, and runs approximately 1,600 km (990 mi) through the states of Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu ending at Kanyakumari, at the southern tip of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Snow Leopard Population Assessment in India
    Snow Leopard Population Assessment in India Population Assessment of World’s Snow Leopards (PAWS) for India Petroglyphs are one of the oldest forms human art, and an important communication tool. Found all around the world, they are a remnant of the prehistoric era when man was an integral part of his natural surroundings. This petroglyph recounts a tale of a female snow leopard and her cub. With wild prey on the decline due to overgrazing by domesticated sheep, the snow leopard is forced to prey upon a local herder’s sheep to provide for her cub. However, in retaliation, the humans kill her daughter, but over time, as the population of snow leopards decline, the herders notice a substantial increase in the population of wild ungulates that graze away most of the sparse grassland thereby leaving their own her to die of starvation. The importance of the snow leopard in their lives dawns upon the human after this, and the next time she spots humans, they surprisingly admire rather than admonish her. Snow Leopard Population Assessment in India Population Assessment of World’s List of Contributors Snow Leopards (PAWS) for India Wildlife Institute of India: V.B. Mathur, G.S. Rawat, S. Sathyakumar, T. Bhattacharya Nature Conservation Foundation-Snow Leopard Trust: C. Mishra, K. Sharma, K.S. Suryawanshi, Y.V. Bhatnagar, D. Rathore, A. Reddy, A. Khara, H. Kour Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change / State Forest and Wildlife Departments, Government of India Inspector General of Forests (Wildlife); Chief Wildlife Warden (Jammu and Kashmir); Chief Wildlife Warden (Himachal Pradesh); Chief Wildlife Warden (Uttarakhand); Chief Wildlife Warden (Sikkim); Chief Wildlife Warden (Arunachal Pradesh).
    [Show full text]
  • Bhadra Management Plan
    1 PREFACE The last Management Plan, for the Protected Area, expired in March 2005 and as such, the writing of a new Management Plan was overdue. The present Management Plan is for the period 2005-2015 and has focussed on Wildlife management. A draft preliminary Management Plan was prepared by January 2005. This also involved detail perambulation of the Sanctuary, updating the field realities and supplementing the details on the map prepared by Survey of India (1971). A summary of the draft preliminary Management Plan in English was prepared, and circulated among the officers. Discussions were held with them, and their suggestions taken into consideration while preparing the draft Management Plan. Majority of the management prescriptions, have evolved through this process. The management efforts so far in this reserve have been on the protection and development of habitat for biodiversity conservation without looking into the problems of surroundings villages. The reserve cannot survive with more than one lakh biomass dependent people and an equal number of cattle head exerting tremendour pressure without developing the multiple use surround through eco-development. The plan has rightly proposed for taking up of eco- development works in the surroundings villages. Great effort has been made to identify the problems that are faced now in the reserve. The strategies prescribed to overcome the problems are based on area specific requirement of each of the problem. The Management Plan has followed the “Manual for Planning Wildlife Management in Protected Areas and Managed Forests by V.B. Sawarkar, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun (1995)”. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “Bhadra Wildlife Reserve” was formally declared a Sanctuary in 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Diversity, Persistence, and Conservation in India by Krithi K
    Mammal Diversity, Persistence, and Conservation in India by Krithi K. Karanth Department of Environment Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Norman L. Christensen, Supervisor ___________________________ Stuart L. Pimm ___________________________ Dean L. Urban ___________________________ James D. Nichols Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Environment in the Graduate School of Duke University 2008 ABSTRACT Mammal Diversity, Persistence, and Conservation in India by Krithi K. Karanth Department of Environment Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Norman L. Christensen, Supervisor ___________________________ Stuart L. Pimm ___________________________ Dean L. Urban ___________________________ James D. Nichols An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophyin the Department of Environment in the Graduate School of Duke University 2008 Copyright by Krithi K. Karanth 2008 Abstract Biodiversity conservation issues are complex and contentious. In this dissertation, I focus on Indian mammal conservation science, management, as well as policy issues that shape these factors. I am particularly interested in where and which mammals are extinction prone, and what factors promote species persistence in human-dominated landscapes. I examine patterns of extinction, range contraction and current distribution of 25 species of large mammals in India in Chapters 2 and 3. I apply occupancy models to data from a sub- continental scale expert opinion survey. I model species occurrence in relation to ecological and social covariates based on a priori hypotheses about the determinants of mammalian distribution patterns. I find that all 25 large mammal species are extinction prone. I find time affects extinction, and conservation initiatives of the last four decades have allowed some species to re-colonize some areas.
    [Show full text]