DOCSLIB.ORG

Glyphosate, Paraquat and Accase Multiple Herbicide Resistance Evolved in a Lolium Rigidum Biotype

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Glyphosate, Paraquat and Accase Multiple Herbicide Resistance Evolved in a Lolium Rigidum Biotype Planta DOI 10.1007/s00425-006-0364-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Glyphosate, paraquat and ACCase multiple herbicide resistance evolved in a Lolium rigidum biotype Qin Yu · Andrew Cairns · Stephen Powles Received: 22 June 2006 / Accepted: 19 July 2006 © Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract Glyphosate is the world’s most widely used biotype, indicating a co-occurrence of two distinct herbicide. A potential substitute for glyphosate in some glyphosate resistance mechanisms within the R popula- use patterns is the herbicide paraquat. Following many tion. In total, this R biotype displays at least four co- years of successful use, neither glyphosate nor paraquat existing resistance mechanisms, endowing multiple resis- could control a biotype of the widespread annual rye- tance to glyphosate, paraquat and ACCase herbicides. grass (Lolium rigidum), and here the world’s Wrst case of This alarming case in the history of herbicide resistance multiple resistance to glyphosate and paraquat is con- evolution represents a serious challenge for the sustain- Wrmed. Dose–response experiments established that the able use of the precious agrochemical resources such as glyphosate rate causing 50% mortality (LD50) for the glyphosate and paraquat. resistant (R) biotype is 14 times greater than for the sus- ceptible (S) biotype. Similarly, the paraquat LD50 for the Keywords ACCase · EPSP synthase mutation · R biotype is 32 times greater than for the S biotype. Glyphosate · Herbicide resistance · L. rigidum · Thus, based on the LD50 R/S ratio, this R biotype of L. Paraquat · Translocation rigidum is 14-fold resistant to glyphosate and 32-fold resistant to paraquat. This R biotype also has evolved resistance to the acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase Introduction (ACCase) inhibiting herbicides. The mechanism of paraquat resistance in this biotype was determined as Glyphosate is the world’s most widely used herbicide restricted paraquat translocation. Resistance to (Baylis 2000). Glyphosate is versatile, controls a broad ACCase-inhibiting herbicides was determined as due to spectrum of annual and perennial weeds (non-selec- an insensitive ACCase. Two mechanisms endowing tive) under varied agricultural, industrial and domestic glyphosate resistance were established: Wrstly, a point situations, and has low mammalian toxicity and little mutation in the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate soil activity. Glyphosate inhibits the enzyme 5-eno- synthase (EPSPS) gene, resulting in an amino acid sub- lpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS, EC stitution of proline to alanine at position 106; secondly, 2.5.1.19), resulting in shikimate accumulation and reduced glyphosate translocation was found in this R reduced production of aromatic amino acids (Steinrüc- ken and Amrhein 1980; Schönburnn et al. 2001). Para- quat is also a non-selective herbicide with a broad- Q. Yu · S. Powles (&) spectrum and rapid-action. Paraquat is toxic because it Western Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, diverts photosynthetic electron transport to oxygen to Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia produce free radicals that cause lipid peroxidation and e-mail: [email protected] membrane damage. In world cropping, glyphosate and paraquat have A. Cairns Department of Agronomy, University of Stellenbosch, helped enable minimum/zero tillage, providing produc- Matieland, 7602, South Africa tivity and soil conservation beneWts. Already high 123 Planta usage of glyphosate dramatically increased from 1995 glyphosate had been used over 25 years, paraquat for onwards with the introduction of transgenic glyphosate over 40 years, and ACCase inhibiting herbicides for resistant soybean, cotton, oilseed rape and maize. This only about 3 years. Seedlings of AFLR2 were initially innovation allowed glyphosate to be used as a selective screened by sequentially spraying glyphosate herbicide in transgenic crops (Shaner 2000). Now, (Roundup Power Max®) and paraquat (Gramoxone®) transgenic glyphosate resistant crops dominate much at commercial rates. Survivors were grown to maturity of North and South American cropping. and seeds obtained from bulk crosses within the popu- Among the attributes of glyphosate has been the lation were used in subsequent experiments (L. rigi- absence of evolved glyphosate resistance in weed spe- dum is obligate cross-pollinated). A known herbicide cies (reviewed by Dyer 1994; Bradshaw et al. 1997). susceptible (S) L. rigidum biotype (VLR1) from Aus- However, evolved glyphosate resistance, Wrst reported tralia was used as a control. Seeds stocks were main- in Lolium rigidum (Pratley et al 1996, 1999; Powles tained at Western Australian Herbicide Resistance et al. 1998), is now reported in at least eight weed spe- Initiative. Seeds of the R and S biotypes were germi- cies. (Heap website: http://www.weedscience.org; nated in 16-cm diameter plastic pots containing potting reviewed by Powles and Preston 2006). In the limited soil and seedlings (20–30 per pot) grown in a glass- biochemical studies thus far conducted on evolved house at 20/15°C day/night temperature under natural glyphosate resistant weeds, two diVerent mechanisms sunlight. Seedlings were well watered and fertilized have been shown to confer glyphosate resistance, i.e. and were herbicide treated at the 2–3 leaf stage. For mutations of the EPSPS gene, or reduced glyphosate radiolabeled herbicide translocation experiments, translocation (reviewed by Powles and Preston 2006). plants were thinned to 2–3 seedlings per pot and Biotypes of 23 weed species worldwide have evolved moved to a growth chamber with 20/15°C day/night paraquat resistance and recently we have identiWed the temperature, 12 h/12 h day/night photoperiod, and a instance of Weld-evolved paraquat resistance in L. rigi- photon Xux density of 250 mol quanta m¡2 s¡1. dum (Yu et al. 2004a). Most evidence has implicated a paraquat resistance mechanism of reduced transloca- Dose response to herbicides tion/or sequestration, although enhanced oxygen radi- cal detoxiWcation has been proposed as the mechanism In dose–response experiments, R and S plants were in a few biotypes (reviewed by Hart and DiTomaso sprayed with rates of glyphosate (0, 0.028, 0.056, 0.112, 1994; Preston 1994; Szigeti and Lehoczki 2003). 0.224, and 0.45 kg ha¡1 for S plants, 0, 0.45, 0.9, 1.8, 3.6, Despite much eVort, the precise mechanisms endowing 7.2kgha¡1 for R plants), paraquat (0, 0.0125, 0.025, paraquat resistance are only partially understood. 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 kg ha¡1 for S plants; 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, Lolium rigidum is a very resistance prone weed spe- and 3.2kgha¡1 for R plants), diclofop-methyl (0, 0.25, cies with extensive resistance to numerous herbicides 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kg ha¡1), Xuazifop (0, 25, 50, 100, and (Powles and Matthews 1992; Preston et al. 1996). Until 200 g ha¡1), haloxyfop (0, 13, 26, 52, 104, and 208 this study, there were no weed species known to pos- gha¡1), propaquizafop (0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 sess multiple resistance to both glyphosate and para- gha¡1), sethoxydim (0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 g ha¡1) quat. Here, we conWrm the Wrst case of Weld-evolved and tralkoxydim (0, 38, 76, 152, 304, and 608 g ha¡1). In multiple resistance to glyphosate and paraquat (plus single-dose experiments, R and S plants were sprayed resistance to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase at the following herbicide doses known to control S (ACCase)-inhibiting herbicides). We investigate the plants: 100gha¡1 chlorsulfuron, 100 g ha¡1 triasulfuron, resistance mechanisms in this biotype and reveal at 15 g ha¡1 sulfometuron, 20 g ha¡1 imazapyr, 72 g ha¡1 least four co-existing mechanisms endowing multiple imazethapyr, 1,000 g ha¡1 atrazine, 1,800 g ha¡1 diuron, resistance across three very diVerent herbicide modes 500 g ha¡1 triXuralin, and 500 g ha¡1 metolachlor. Her- of action. bicides were applied as commercial formulations plus adjuvant as required (either as 0.1% v/v BS1000 or 0.1% v/v Hasten) using a cabinet sprayer delivering Materials and methods 106 l ha¡1 water at a pressure of 200 kPa. Plants were returned to the glasshouse after treatment, and the Plant material mortality and shoot dry mass (oven-dried at 70°C for 2 days) were recorded 21 days after herbicide applica- Seeds of the putative resistant (R) population of L. tion. Plants were recorded as alive if they had strongly rigidum (termed AFLR2) were originally collected tillered since herbicide application. For application of from a farm in the Tulbagh Valley, South Africa, where the soil applied triXuralin and metolachlor herbicides, 123 Planta 100 seeds were placed on the soil surface, covered At harvest, whole plants were gently washed out of the with 0.5 cm of soil, watered and left for 1 day to soil, rinsed in 0.1% Triton X-100, blotted dry, pressed imbibe before herbicide treatment. After herbicide and oven-dried at 70°C for 48 h, then exposed to a treatment, 1 cm of untreated soil was placed on the phosphor imager plate (24 h) before scanning for soil surface. The number of emerged seedlings was radioactivity. The experiment was repeated at least recorded 21 days after herbicide spraying. Dose– two times for each herbicide and each harvest had 10– response experiments were repeated during April and 12 individual replicates. October in 2005 and each treatment contained 3–4 replicates. EPSPS gene sequencing Leaf uptake and translocation of herbicides The R biotype plants were sprayed with 900 g ha¡1 glyphosate at the 2–3 leaf stage and the survivors were In order to simulate commercial agricultural herbicide used for RNA preparation. Total RNA was extracted treatment, and follow the movement of the radiola- from shoot tissue of the R and S biotypes using the beled herbicides, plants at the 2 or 3 leaf stage were Plant RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Pty Ltd., Doncaster sprayed with commercial herbicides (450 g ha¡1 VIC, Australia).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed Fluorescence Imaging of Photosynthesis Inhibitor and Heavy Metal Induced Stress in Potato
    Cent. Eur. J. Biol. • 7(3) • 2012 • 531-541 DOI: 10.2478/s11535-012-0038-z Central European Journal of Biology Delayed fluorescence imaging of photosynthesis inhibitor and heavy metal induced stress in potato Research Article Jaka Razinger1,*, Luka Drinovec2, Maja Berden-Zrimec3 1Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 2Aerosol d.o.o., 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 3Institute of Physical Biology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Received 09 November 2011; Accepted 13 March 2012 Abstract: Early chemical-induced stress in Solanum tuberosum leaves was visualized using delayed fluorescence (DF) imaging. The ability to detect spatially heterogeneous responses of plant leaves exposed to several toxicants using delayed fluorescence was compared to prompt fluorescence (PF) imaging and the standard maximum fluorescence yield of PSII measurements (Fv/Fm). The toxicants used in the study were two photosynthesis inhibitors (herbicides), 100 μM methyl viologen (MV) and 140 μM diuron (DCMU), and two heavy metals, 100 μM cadmium and 100 μM copper. The exposure times were 5 and 72 h. Significant photosynthesis-inhibitor effects were already visualized after 5 h. In addition, a significant reduction in the DF/PF index was measured in DCMU- and MV-treated leaves after 5 h. In contrast, only DCMU-treated leaves exhibited a significant decrease in Fv/Fm after 5 h. All treatments resulted in a significant decrease in the DF/PF parameter after 72 h of exposure, when only MV and Cd treatment resulted in visible symptoms. Our study highlights the power of delayed fluorescence imaging. Abundant quantifiable spatial information was obtained with the instrumental setup. Delayed fluorescence imaging has been confirmed as a very responsive and useful technique for detecting stress induced by photosynthesis inhibitors or heavy metals.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Health Criteria 39 PARAQUAT and DIQUAT
    Environmental Health Criteria 39 PARAQUAT AND DIQUAT Please note that the layout and pagination of this web version are not identical with the printed version. Paraquat and diquat (EHC 39, 1984) INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA 39 PARAQUAT AND DIQUAT This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization. Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization World Health Orgnization Geneva, 1984 The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization. The main objective of the IPCS is to carry out and disseminate evaluations of the effects of chemicals on human health and the quality of the environment. Supporting activities include the development of epidemiological, experimental laboratory, and risk-assessment methods that could produce internationally comparable results, and the development of manpower in the field of toxicology. Other activities carried out by the IPCS include the development of know-how for coping with chemical accidents, coordination of laboratory testing and epidemiological studies, and promotion of research on the mechanisms of the biological action of chemicals. ISBN 92 4 154099 4 The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations already available.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Herbicides
    Title of the course : Weed Management Credit: 3(2+1) Class : 3rd Year IInd Semester Title of the topic : Principles of weed management College : Krishi vigyan Kendra,College of Agriculture, Rewa, JNKVV, Jabalpur Name of Teacher : Dr. (Mrs.) Smita Singh Classification of Herbicides Herbicides: Chemical method of weed control is very effective in certain cases and have great scope provided the herbicides are cheap, efficient and easily available. The chemicals used for killing the weeds or inhibiting growth of weeds are called herbicides (Weedicides). Classification of Herbicides: Herbicides are classified in different ways: A) First Group Chemical Herbicides: I) Classification of herbicides according to chemical composition. II) Classification of herbicides according to their use. III) Classification of herbicides based on time of application. IV) Classification of herbicides according to Formulation. V) Classification of herbicides according to residual effect. B) Second Group – Bio herbicides C) Third Group herbicidal mixtures. Classification of herbicide I) Classification of Herbicide Based on Chemical Nature or Composition Compounds having chemical affinities are grouped together. This is useful in liting and characterising herbicides. i) Inorganic Herbicides:Contain no carbon actions in their molecules. These were the first chemicals used for weed control before the introduction of the organic compounds, example are: a) Acids:Arsenic acid, arsenious acid, arsenic trioxide sulphuric acid. b) Salts:Borax, copper sulphate, ammonium sulphate, Na chlorate , Na arsenite , copper nitrate. ii) Organic Herbicides:Oils and non oils contain carbon and hydrogen in their molecules. a) Oils: Diesel oil, standard solvent, xylene-type, aromatic oils, polycyclic , aromatic oils etc. b) Aliphatics:Dalapon, TCA, Acrolein, Glyphosphate methyl bromide.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Paraquat and Alachlor on Soil Microorganisms in Peat Soil
    Pertanika 15(2),121-125 (1992) Effects of Paraquat and Alachlor on Soil Microorganisms in Peat Soil ISMAIL SAHID, AINON HAMZAH and PARIDAH M. ARIS Faculty of Life Sciences Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia Keywords: AlacWor, paraquat, microbes, peat soil. ABSTRAK Satu kajian telah dijalankan untuk melihat kesan alachlor dan paraquat ke atas aktiviti mikrob dalam tanah gambut. Kesan racun rumpai ke atas pembebasan CO2 dan aktiviti phosphatase dimonitor selama 12 minggu. Hasil yang diperolehi menunjukkan paraquat dan alachlor yang disembur kepada tanah menyebabkan peningkatan pembebasan CO di peringkat awal pengeraman tetapi berkurangan selepas 53 han. Lebih banyak CO dibebaskan 2 2 dari tanah yang dirawat dengan alachlor berbanding dengan tanah yang dirawat dengan paraquat. Aktiviti phosphatase meningkat di peringkat awal pengeraman bagi tanah yang diperlakukan dengan sama ada alachlor atau paraquat. Aktiviti phosphatase meningkat di peringkat awal pengeraman bagi tanah yang diperlakukan dengan sama ada alachlor atau paraquat tetapi aktiviti phosphatase berkurangan seiepas 12 han eraman. Populasi kulat dan bakteria dipengaruhi oleh kedua-dua racun rumpai yang diuji. Pada kepekatan 250 ppm, alachlor dan paraquat, masing-masing menyebabkan pengurangan populasi bakteria kira-kira 78 dan 95%. Alachlor didapati lebih toksik terhadap kulat berbanding paraquat. ABSTRACT A study was carried out to investigate the effects ofalachlor and paraquat on microbial activities in peat soil. Effects ofthe herbicides on CO2 evolution and phosphatase activity were monitored for 12 weeks in ambient conditions. The results showed that paraquat and alachlor caused an initial increase in CO2 released and subsequently decreased after 53 days of incubation. Comparatively, more CO2 was released from the soil treated with alachlor than that treated with paraquat.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides EPA-738-F-96-018 Environmental Protection and Toxic Substances August 1997 Agency (7508W) R.E.D
    United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA-738-F-96-018 Environmental Protection And Toxic Substances August 1997 Agency (7508W) R.E.D. FACTS Paraquat Dichloride Pesticide All pesticides sold or distributed in the United States must be Reregistration registered by EPA, based on scientific studies showing that they can be used without posing unreasonable risks to people or the environment. Because of advances in scientific knowledge, the law requires that pesticides which were first registered before November 1, 1984, be reregistered to ensure that they meet today's more stringent standards. Under the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, EPA must consider the increased susceptibility of infants and children to pesticide residues in food, as well as aggregate exposure of the public to pesticide residues from all sources, and the cumulative effects of pesticides and other compounds with a common mechanism of toxicity in establishing and reassessing tolerances. In evaluating pesticides for reregistration, EPA obtains and reviews a complete set of studies from pesticide producers, describing the human health and environmental effects of each pesticide. The Agency develops any mitigation measures or regulatory controls needed to effectively reduce each pesticide's risks. EPA then reregisters pesticides that can be used without posing unreasonable risks to human health or the environment. When a pesticide is eligible for reregistration, EPA explains the basis for its decision in a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) document. This fact sheet summarizes the information in the RED document for reregistration case 0262, paraquat dichloride (commonly referred to as paraquat). Use Profile Paraquat dichloride is a herbicide currently registered to control weeds and grasses in many agricultural and non-agricultural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • HPPD) Inhibitor Herbicide Resistance in Waterhemp (Amaranthus Tuberculatus
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 5-6-2019 Using RNA-seq to characterize responses to 4 hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibitor herbicide resistance in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) Daniel R. Kohlhase Iowa State University Jamie A. O’Rourke (USDA)–Agricultural Research Service Micheal D. K. Owen Iowa State University, [email protected] Michelle A. Graham (USDA)–Agricultural Research Service, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Kohlhase, Daniel R.; O’Rourke, Jamie A.; Owen, Micheal D. K.; and Graham, Michelle A., "Using RNA-seq to characterize responses to 4 hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibitor herbicide resistance in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus)" (2019). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 2163. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/2163 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Kohlhase et al. BMC Plant Biology (2019) 19:182 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1795-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Using RNA-seq to characterize responses to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibitor herbicide resistance in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) Daniel R. Kohlhase1, Jamie A. O’Rourke2, Micheal D. K. Owen1* and Michelle A. Graham2* Abstract Background: Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer) is a problem weed commonly found in the Midwestern United States that can cause crippling yield losses for both maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.
    [Show full text]
  • Atrazine 4L Herbicide
    RESTRICTED USE PESTICIDE (Ground and Surface Water Concerns) For retail sale to and use only by certified applicators or persons under their direct supervision and only for those uses covered by the certified applicator’s certification. This product is a restricted use herbicide due to ground and surface water concerns. Users must read and follow all precautionary statements and instructions for use in order to minimize potential for Atrazine to reach ground and surface water. GROUP 5 HERBICIDE Atrazine 4L Herbicide For season-long weed control in Chemical fallow, Conifers, PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS Corn, Fallowland, Guava, Lawns, Macadamia nuts, Sorghum, Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals Sugarcane, and Turf. CAUTION: Harmful if swallowed or absorbed through skin. Causes ACTIVE INGREDIENTS: moderate eye irritation. Avoid contact with skin, eyes or clothing. Atrazine ................................................................ 42.2% Avoid breathing spray mist. Related compounds ............................................. 0.8% PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) OTHER INGREDIENTS: ......................................... 57.0% Some materials that are chemical-resistant to this product are poly- TOTAL: ............................................................ 100.0% ethylene or polyvinyl chloride. If you want more options, follow the This product contains 4 pounds of active ingredients per gallon. instructions for Category A on the EPA chemical-resistance cate- gory selection chart. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN Applicators
    [Show full text]
  • Using Countless Tons of Arsenic As a Non-Selective Contact and Soil Sterilant
    87 In addition to requiring the user to obtain a permit from, the agricultural commissioner, t4e regulations prescribe certain conditions to be met by those who possess or use sodium arsenite as follows: (a) No pesticide containing sodium arsenite shall be applied on exposed vegetation (other than dormant grapeviries) unless the vegetation to be treated is enclosed within a good and su£ficient fence or otherwis.e made inaccessible to grazing animals, pets, and children. (b) No pesticide containing sodium arsenite sha,11 be applied on soil or vegetation (other than dormant grapevines) in any area penetrated by roots of any plant of value, without the written consent of the owner of such plant. ( c) No pesticide containing sodium arsenite shall be kept or placed in drinking cups, pop bottles, or other containers of a type commonly used for food or drink. (d) No pesticide containing sodium arsenite, whether in concentrated or dilute form, shall be stored, placed, or transported in any container or receptacle which does not bear on the outside a conspicuous poison label which conforms to the label required to be placed on all packages of arsenic compounds and pre:parations sold or delivered within the State. These are only procedures that any careful person would observe in the use of a poisonous material like sodium arsenite. It is just over one year since the regulations became effective. In that time we have heard of no accidental deaths involving sodium arsenite in California and the regulations appear to be serving a good purpose. SUBSTITUTE HERBICIDES FOR SODIUM ARSENITE W.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Substance Fact Sheet
    Right to Know Hazardous Substance Fact Sheet Common Name: PARAQUAT Synonyms: Dimethyl Viologen; Pathclear; Sweep CAS Number: 4685-14-7 Chemical Name: 4,4'-Bipyridinium, 1,1’-Dimethyl- RTK Substance Number: 1458 Date: September 1999 Revision: August 2008 DOT Number: UN 2781 Description and Use EMERGENCY RESPONDERS >>>> SEE BACK PAGE Paraquat is a colorless to yellow, odorless solid. It is used as Hazard Summary a quick-acting herbicide and a plant dessicant. Hazard Rating NJDOH NFPA HEALTH 3 - FLAMMABILITY 0 - REACTIVITY 0 - CARCINOGEN POISONOUS GASES ARE PRODUCED IN FIRE CONTAINERS MAY EXPLODE IN FIRE Reasons for Citation DOES NOT BURN f Paraquat is on the Right to Know Hazardous Substance List Hazard Rating Key: 0=minimal; 1=slight; 2=moderate; 3=serious; because it is cited by OSHA, ACGIH, DOT, NIOSH, DEP, 4=severe IRIS and EPA. f This chemical is on the Special Health Hazard Substance f Paraquat can affect you when inhaled. List. f Paraquat should be handled as a CARCINOGEN--WITH EXTREME CAUTION. f Contact can severely irritate and burn the skin and eyes with possible eye damage. f Inhaling Paraquat can irritate the nose and throat. f Paraquat can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and SEE GLOSSARY ON PAGE 5. abdominal pain. f Inhaling Paraquat can irritate the lungs. Higher exposures FIRST AID may cause a build-up of fluid in the lungs (pulmonary edema), a medical emergency. Eye Contact f Repeated exposure to Paraquat may cause scarring of the f Immediately flush with large amounts of cool water for at lungs (fibrosis) and reduce lung function with symptoms of least 15 minutes, lifting upper and lower lids.
    [Show full text]
  • California Turfgrass Culture
    California Turfgrass Culture FORMERLY, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TURFGRASS CULTURE OCTOBER 1963 VOLUME 13 - NUMBER 4 Regulation of Sodium Arsenite as an Injurious Material John C. Hillis California Department of Agriculture Sacramento Effective January 1, 1962, sodium arsenite was placed pest or vegetation which it is intended to destroy. Thus under regulation as an injurious material. Since then, an injurious material sold for weed control or control of a persons intending to use it in California have been re- plant disease or of a micro-organism is subject to the quired to obtain a permit from the county agricultural requirement of a permit. On the other hand, if sodium commissioner. In addition, it is illegal to sell or deliver arsenite is sold for a non-agricultural and non-pesticidal it to persons who do not have the required permit. use, for example, in metallurgy, or in drilling to facilitate the operation mechanically, the use would not be subject The regulation was adopted after public hearing and to the requirement of a permit. consideration of the history of accidental deaths over the years as well as injury to property. All sizes of sodium arsenite pesticide containers are subject to the requirement of a permit; however, there is Section 1080 of the Agricultural Code provides that an exemption in that no permit is required to use products “after investigation and hearing the Director shall adopt sold as dilute ready-to-use syrups or dry baits, registered rules and regulations governing the application, in pest and labeled for use as poison baits for the control of control or other agricultural operations, of any material he insects and other arthropods, snails and slugs, or rodents.
    [Show full text]