DOCSLIB.ORG

Institutional Reform in Mongolia's Cashmere Sector

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Institutional Reform in Mongolia's Cashmere Sector Report No. 26240-MOG From Goats to Coats: Public Disclosure Authorized Institutional Reform in Mongolia’s Cashmere Sector December 19, 2003 Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit East Asia and Pacific Region The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of end January 2002) Currency unit = Togrog (Tg) US$1 = Tg 1100 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Metric System ABBREVIATION AND ACRONYMS ADB - Asian Development Bank CMEA - Council for Mutual Economic Assistance FDI - Foreign Direct Investment FSU - Former Soviet Union GDP - Gross Domestic Product GTZ - Deutsche GeseLLschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH IDA - International Development Association NBFIs - Non-Bank Financial Institutions NCSM - National Center for Standardization Metrology NSO - National Statistical Office R & D - Research and Development SCM - Supply Chain Management SCMIC - Schneider Cashmere Market Indicators SFU - Sheep Forage Unit UNDP - United Nations Development Organization USAID - United States Agency for International Development WTO - World Trade Organization Regional Vice President: Jemal-ud-din Kassum, EAPVP Country Director: Ian C. Porter, EACTF Sector Director: Homi Kharas, EASPR Sector Manager Tamar Manuelyan Atinc, EASPR Task Team Leader: Vera Songwe, EASPR Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................................................i Chapter 1. Boom, Bust and Future Prospects ........................................................................................................... 1 The transition from command to market............................................................................................................1 The 1991-96 cashmere boom.............................................................................................................................1 The downturn in the cashmere industry, 1997-2002..........................................................................................3 Household incomes and cashmere production...................................................................................................4 Future prospects.................................................................................................................................................7 Chapter 2. Dynamics of Cashmere Supply................................................................................................................ 8 Cashmere supply, 1990-2000: Transition to a market-oriented system.............................................................8 Access to raw material, infrastructure and environment....................................................................................9 Infrastructure concerns.....................................................................................................................................10 Environmental impact and property right ........................................................................................................12 Cashmere supply and livelihoods ....................................................................................................................18 Reform options.................................................................................................................................................20 Chapter 3. Standardization and Quality Control ................................................................................................... 23 Quality developments in cashmere sector........................................................................................................23 Reform options: Grading and standards...........................................................................................................26 Chapter 4. Dynamics of Cashmere Demand and the Processing Industry ........................................................... 34 Overview of processing industry .....................................................................................................................34 Government policy stance................................................................................................................................37 Impact of tax on earnings.................................................................................................................................38 Increasing competitiveness of Mongolian cashmere sector.............................................................................43 Chapter 5. Cashmere Marketing and Distribution Channels................................................................................ 47 Procurement and distribution systems: From command to markets ................................................................47 Current marketing channels .............................................................................................................................49 Constraints to intra-industry integration and policy options............................................................................53 Luxury good marketing and foreign direct investment....................................................................................58 Increasing communication flows between herders and processors..................................................................58 Chapter 6. Engineering Public Policy Choices to Strengthen Cashmere Industry and Reduce Poverty........... 60 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................60 Public sector policy choices to mitigate market failures and market imperfections in cashmere sector .........63 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................65 List of Boxes Box 2-1: Goat Habit 12 Box 2-2. Pastoralism and Intensification 14 Box 2-3: Assessment of Land and Land Management in Mongolia 17 Box 3-1: Cashmere's Five Quality Factors 23 Box 3-2: Importance of Grading and Standardization 27 Box 3-3: Experience from the Australian Wool Corporation: Normative Classification 28 Box 4-1: Cashmere Production Steps 36 Box 5-1: Vertical and Horizontal Integration in Chinese Manufacturing 57 Box 6-1: Cashmere Policy Formulating and Advisory Institutions in Mongolia* 62 List of Figures Figure 1-1: Boom and Bust in the Mongolia’s Cashmere Industry, 1993-2002 1 Figure 1-2: Annual Growth of GDP and Agricultural Sector, 1990-2001 2 Figure 1-3: Real Growth of GDP, Livestock and Crop Production, 1996-2001 2 Figure 1-4: Exports of five main commodities in 1993-2002 3 Figure 1-5: Direction of Trade in 1992-2002 in percent of Export 3 Figure 1-6: Openness of Mongolian Economy, 1990-2002 3 Figure 1-7: Togrog REER Index, 1991-2000 Six-month moving average 2 Figure 1-8: Household categories 4 Figure 1-9: Share of household groups in total by number of livestock owned 5 Figure 1-10: Trends in demand for luxury fine fibers, 1996-2000 7 Figure 2-1: Increased preference for goats 8 Figure 2-2: Number of Goats by Region, 1990-2002 8 Figure 2-3: Mongolia Pasture Capacity Thresholds 13 Figure 2-4: Simulation of cashmere production with and without Dzud in US$ million 19 Figure 2-5: Simulation of cashmere production with and without Dzud per household in US$ 19 Figure 2-6: Simulation of cashmere production with and without Dzud in tons 19 Figure 2-7: Simulation of cashmere production with and without Dzud per household in kg 19 Figure 3-1: International Dehaired Cashmere Prices 1970-2002 (All prices quoted in Jan) 25 Figure 3-2: Income from quality improvement of raw cashmere in total cashmere export 25 Figure 3-3: Income increase from quality improvement by household with livestock 25 Figure 3-4: Share of quality breeds in Mongolia’s goatherd 29 Figure 3-5: Percentage of breeding female goats in total goatherd 29 Figure 4-1: Import trend of fine animal hair (not combed)-in tons, 1996-2000 34 Figure 4-2: The effect of the export ban and tax on compositions of cashmere exports, 1993-2001 38 Figure 4-3: Share of total export taxes in Revenue and GDP 40 Figure 4-4: Share of cashmere export taxes in Revenue and GDP 40 Figure 4-5: Nominal export tax burden on herders in percent 41 Figure 4-6: Taxes and Fees Across Supply Chain 42 Figure 5-1: Main Marketing Channels and Agents for Cashmere Products 48 Figure 5-2: Export Restrictions Benefited Traders/Dehairers 55 Figure 5-3: Share of top 5 importers of fine animal hair in world import 56 Figure 5-4: Value Chain-Mongolian Cashmere 57 Figure 5-5: Increasing vertical integration among firms 58 Figure 5-6: Distances from cashmere-producing regions to UB market 59 List of Tables Table 1-1: Cashmere’s Role in Mongolia’s Economy 1 Table 1-2: Cashmere export trends 3 Table 1-3: Survival of goat offspring following Dzud 3 Table 1-4: Livestock by main types, 1989-2001 4 Table 1-5: Share of households groups in cashmere production and average income 5 Table 1-6: Sources of livelihood by well-being category: soum center /1 6 Table 1-7: Sources of livelihood by well-being category: rural communities /1 6 Table 2-1: Fodder Production Systems and Evolution of Fodder Supply, 1990-2002 10 Table 2-2: Livestock watering facilities, 1990-2000 11 Table 2-3: Mongolia Pasture Capacity, 1995-2001 13 Table 2-4: Some Existing Conversion Rates (Sheep
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Financial and Fiscal Policies for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia,” Jointly Prepared by Dr
    1 Financial and Fiscal Polices for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia Policy Research Paper Knowledge Partnership Project Financial and Fiscal Policies for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia March 2004 Korea Development Institute (KDI) Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA) 2 Financial and Fiscal Polices for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia Foreword Knowledge is a critical factor in economic and social development in the 21st century. Knowledge Partnership (KP) Project, a new cooperative framework established between the World Bank and the Korean government has endeavored to bridge the knowledge gap between developed and developing countries by disseminating Korea’s economic development experience. Amid the transition toward a market-based economy, the Mongolian economy is confronted with various challenges in the financial sector, which include weak banking sector, expanding distressed assets, low public trust and ineffective government regulations. This, in turn, increased the risk of financial instability, calling for appropriate policy responses from the government. The policy research paper “Financial and Fiscal Policies for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia,” jointly prepared by Dr. Dongsoo Kang, Dr. Moon Soo Kang, Dr. Seok Kyun Hur from KDI and Dr. Chiho Kim from the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation, offers a comprehensive assessment on the sustainability of economic system in Mongolia. The paper presents in-depth analysis on major issues in financial and fiscal policies including the Non-Performing Loan (NPL) management, deposit protection, non-banking financial institutions, and fiscal sustainability and scrutinizes economic theories in order to provide relevant policy alternatives for the Mongolian government. In addition, the Korean experience as well as international practices was shrewdly reviewed for reference guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Economic Development Planning and Infrastructure Funding for Mongolia Government Publications Registration Number 11-1051000-000943-04
    Presented by the MOEF, Republic of Korea 2018/19 KSP Policy Consultation Report Mongolia Strengthening Economic Development Planning and Infrastructure Funding for Mongolia Government Publications Registration Number 11-1051000-000943-04 2018/19 KSP Policy Consultation Report Strengthening Economic Development Planning Mongolia and Project Performance Assessments in Mongolia 2018/19 KSP Policy Consultation Report Project Title Strengthening Economic Development Planning and Infrastructure Funding for Mongolia Prepared for The Government of Mongolia In Cooperation with ‌Ministry of Finance (MoF), National Development Agency (NDA), Development Bank of Mongolia (DBM) Supported by Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF), Republic of Korea Prepared by Korea Development Institute (KDI) Project Director Sanghoon Ahn, Executive Director, Center for International Development (CID), KDI Youngsun Koh, ‌Executive Director, Global Knowledge Exchange & Development Center, Former Executive Director, CID, KDI Project Manager Changjae Lee, Visiting Senior Fellow, CID, KDI Project Officer Jinha Yoo, Senior Research Associate, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI Jun Hee Kim, Senior Research Associate, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI Senior Advisor Seok Dong Kim, Former Chairman of Financial Services Commission Principal Investigator Myung Ho Park, Professor, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Authors Chapter 1. Myung Ho Park, Professor, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Belguun Enkhmandal, Specialist, MoF Ichinnorov Luvsanvandan, Officer,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 an Analysis of the Mongolian Political and Economic Transition: A
    An Analysis of the Mongolian Political and Economic Transition: A Model Democracy with a Promising Future By Enkhtaivan Oyunbazar May, 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in (Economics) in cursu honorum Reviewed and approved by: Dr. Alexander Mirescu Submitted to The Honors Program, Saint Peter’s University March 23, 2015 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank all of the people who have been helpful, supportive, and caring to make this work possible. I am extremely thankful to have a wonderful family, friends, and teachers who have helped me throughout life and continue to support me in any endeavor. Special thanks to the Director of the Honors Program Dr. Rachel Wifall and my advisor for this work Dr. Alexander Mirescu from the Department of Political Science. Abstract Mongolia is a democratic free market-oriented Asian state and it is the second largest land locked country in the world. Located between the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China, Mongolia’s total area of 1.6 million square kilometers encompasses an area greater than that of Britain, France, Germany, and Italy combined; four times the size of Japan. Mongolia is the fifth largest country in Asia and it is also the least densely populated country in the world; the country’s population reached only three million in 2015. Mongolia became the second communist country in the world after the USSR when the Bolsheviks advised the young Mongolian nationalists to establish a Marxist state. Mongolia emerged as a supplier of raw materials and food for the USSR’s Siberian industries and towns leading up to the transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Mongolia
    CPS Final Mongolia Review Validation of the Country Partnership Validation Strategy Final Review, 2017–2020 Independent Evaluation Raising development impact through evaluation Validation Report April 2021 Mongolia: Validation of the Country Partnership Strategy Final Review, 2017–2020 This is a redacted version of the document, which excludes information that is subject to exeptions to disclosure set fourth in ADB’s Access to Information Policy. Independent Evaluation: VR-25 NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Mongolia ends on 31 December. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. (iii) For an explanation of rating descriptions used in ADB evaluation reports, see ADB. 2015. 2015 Guidelines for the Preparation of Country Assistance Program Evaluations and Country Partnership Strategy Final Review Validations. Manila. Director General Marvin Taylor-Dormond, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) Deputy Director General Véronique N. Salze-Lozac'h, IED Director Joanne Asquith, Thematic and Country Division, IED Team leader Tomoo Ueda, Principal Evaluation Specialist, IED Team members Sergio Villena, Evaluation Officer, IED Jullie Ann Palomares, Evaluation Assistant, IED The guidelines formally adopted by the Independent Evaluation Department (IED) on avoiding conflict of interest in its independent evaluations were observed in the preparation of this report. To the knowledge of IED management, there were no conflicts of interest of the persons preparing, reviewing, or approving this report. In preparing any evaluation report, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the IED does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Poverty in Mongolia
    The Problem of Poverty in Mongolia: From Socialism to the Millennium Development Goals by Richard Smith, MFA MSW (Correspondent Author) 120 Haviland Hall School of Social Welfare Berkeley, CA 94720 Phone: (510) 590-7790 Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper traces the evolution of poverty in Mongolia in modernity and closes by highlighting progress towards Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and opportunities raised by Millennium Challenge Accounts (MCA). This paper includes a review of poverty literature content analysis of historical documents, national and multilateral reports. Finally, the paper analyzes data by province from the 2007 Human Development Report to identify longitudinal and geographic trends in development. Although development in 2006 is more dispersed, it is driven almost solely by GDP. Furthermore, there is risk of losing a high baseline in education and health provision. Education needs to be a priority to sustain and improve on existing levels of social development. Keywords: Poverty, Mongolia, Development Acknowlegements: This paper was drafted under the supervision of James Midgely, Ph.D. I would like to thank Sherrill Clark, Ph.D. and Neil Gilbert, Ph.D who commented on drafts. Mongolian Poverty - 2 - Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................3 History and Politics Administrative Organization, Infrastructure and Economic Activity Health and Safety The Mongolian Education and Social
    [Show full text]
  • CAREC COUNTRIES ECONOMIES Overview CAREC REGION: 11 COUNTRIES 320 MILLION POPULATION 16 443 290 SQUARE KILOMETER AREA …BILLION USD ECONOMIC POWER
    EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION CHALLENGES FOR CAREC COUNTRIES DOCTOR, PROFESSOR ENKHBAIGALI BYAMBASUREN CAREC COUNTRIES ECONOMIES Overview CAREC REGION: 11 COUNTRIES 320 MILLION POPULATION 16 443 290 SQUARE KILOMETER AREA …BILLION USD ECONOMIC POWER 10/18/10 This is a Footer ECONOMIC POWERS OF CAREC COUNTRIES ARE DIFFERENT Economic Trade with CAREC GDP, 2017 (billion GDP per GDP growth, Trade with CAREC Country complexiy countries as percent $) capita, 2017 ($) 2017 (%) countries index of total trade AFGANISTAN 19,500,000,000 550.1 2.7 n.a 45.60% 414,500,000$ AZERBAIJAN 40,700,000,000 4 135.1 0.1 -0.65 15.65% 3,596,800,000$ CHINA 12,237,700,000,000 8 827.0 6.9 0.69 1.4% GEORGIA 15,100,000,000 4 045.4 4.8 -0.06 27.8% KAZAKHSTAN 162,900,000,000 9 030.3 4.1 0.09 19.1% KYRGYZ 7,600,000,000 1 220.5 4.6 -0.29 33.6% MONGOLIA 11,400,000,000 3 717.5 5.3 -0.79 76.0% PAKISTAN 305,000,000,000 1 547.9 5.7 -0.86 9.0% TAJIKSTAN 7,100,000,000 801.1 7.6 -1.1 39.0% National Development Institute of Mongolia TURKMENISTAN 37,900,000,000 6 586.6 6.5 -1.2 88.8% 10/18/10UZBEKISTAN 49,700,000,000 1 533.9 5.3 -0.85 28.0% 4 POPULATIONS AND WORKFORCE CAPABILITIES ARE DIFFERENT Human Population number in Country Population GDP GDP per capita Poverty (%) Development poverty Index AFGANISTAN 35,530,000 19,500,000,000 550.1$ 18,887,537 54.5% 0.498 AZERBAIJAN 9,854,000 40,700,000,000 4 135.1$ 501,972 5.4% 0.757 CHINA 1,386,400,000 12,237,700,000,000 8 827.0$ 42,978,245 3.1% 0.752 GEORGIA 3,700,000 15,100,000,000 4 045.4$ 816,432 21.9% 0.780 KAZAKHSTAN 18,000,000 162,900,000,000
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Mongolia in 2015
    2015 Minerals Yearbook MONGOLIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior November 2018 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Mongolia By Meralis Plaza-Toledo Mongolia, a country located in northeast Asia, is bordered Production on the north by Russia and on the south by China. Historically, Mongolia’s economy relied on herding and agriculture, but in In 2015, production of molybdenum (mine output) increased recent times, it has become increasingly reliant on the mining by 28%; gold (mine output), by 27%; copper, by 25%; and sector. In 2015, Mongolia accounted for 3% of the world’s crude petroleum, by 18%. Production of fluorspar decreased by fluorspar production. In addition, the country has extensive 38%, and that of crude steel, by 32%, owing to lower demand deposits of coal, copper, gold, petroleum, and uranium. As of (table 1; Industrials Minerals, 2015; National Statistical Office 2015, the Government was actively taking action to increase of Mongolia, 2016). foreign direct investment (FDI) to stabilize the economy Structure of the Mineral Industry (Mungunzul and Chang, 2016, p. 1; McRae, 2017; World Bank, The, 2017). Table 2 lists Mongolia’s major mineral industry facilities. Most of the producing mining companies in Mongolia were Minerals in the National Economy owned by the state or by joint ventures between international In 2015, the mineral industry in Mongolia contributed companies and the Government of Mongolia, although a few approximately 20% to the country’s gross domestic product companies were wholly owned by foreign investors. (GDP). The mining sector accounted for 78.8% of total exports, Mineral Trade of which coal, copper concentrate, iron ore and concentrate, and crude petroleum constituted about 74% of total exports and 85% In 2015, trade between Mongolia and Russia decreased by of mineral commodity exports.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Powers Competition in the Mining Sector of Mongolia
    SHS Web of Conferences 28, 01137 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20162801137 RPTSS 2015 Foreign powers competition in the mining sector of Mongolia Vladimir Rodionov 1a , Innokentii Aktamov1, Damdin Badaraev2, Timur Badmatsyrenov1, Aleksey Kombaev1, Irina Dorzhieva1 ¹ Buryat State University 670000, Smolina Str. 24a, Ulan-Ude, Russia ² Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies RAS (SB), 670047, Sakhiyanova Str. 6, Ulan-Ude, Russia Abstract. The paper is about the issue of Mongolia cooperation with foreign companies playing an important role in its foreign policy strategy and national security. At the beginning of the 1990s, having proclaimed a "multipillar" policy strategy in relations with the world, Ulaanbaatar tends to follow it in the economic cooperation not willing to give any preference to any country. It creates a situation of competition between foreign companies backed by their states, especially such great powers as Russia, China, the USA. The most tense moment in the struggle for the influence in Mongolia is the rivalry between the different discourses, pretending the exclusive right to nominate the most effective model of cooperation between Mongolia and foreign states in the ore-mining industry. Among the most well-defined discourses, there are three of them. China prefers to define the discourse of "economic feasibility". Western states, as a rule, tend to rely on the discourse of "values community", which includes such concepts as "democracy", "environmentally friendly", "transparency” Russia often uses the "geopolitical" discourse. In spite of the attractiveness and relative effectiveness of the discourse selected by Russia, there are certain limits to its use. Introduction Copper 36 millions of tons Uranium 75 thousands of tons A few years ago modern economy of Mongolia was Iron ore 11 billions of tons going through a boom, linked with the development of Zinc 1 millions of tons the mining industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroeconomic Performance and Policy Challenges at the Subregional Level Chapter 2 2
    MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND POLICY CHALLENGES AT THE SUBREGIONAL LEVEL CHAPTER 2 2 “Asia is undergoing a rapid and strong economic, social, cultural and strategic resurgence — the sum of which is certain to redefine global affairs.” Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, President of Indonesia Macroeconomic Performance and Policy Challenges at the Subregional Level While the developing countries of Asia and the Pacific strengthened their growth performance substantially from 4.7% in 2009 to 8.8% in 2010, this region is so vast and diverse that aggregate figures mask the diversity in performance and challenges being faced at the subregion and country levels. Therefore, this chapter provides a more disaggregated analysis of macroeconomic performance and policy challenges at the subregional level with some details at the country level. In the Survey, the Asia-Pacific region is divided into five geographic subregions, namely East and North-East Asia, North and Central Asia, Pacific, South and South-West Asia and South-East Asia. An overview of the macroeconomic performance and policy challenges of all the subregions is followed by more detailed analysis. 51 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL survey OF ASIA AND THE pacific 2011 Divergent performance of subregions oil revenues have been able to cushion some of the budgetary shortfalls with transfers from State The economic recovery in East and North-East oil funds, while others have had to rely more on Asia strengthened in 2010, while the primary international assistance and are undergoing fiscal channels of recovery tended to differ, reflecting the consolidation in consultation with the International economic diversity in the subregion. Indeed, China Monetary Fund (IMF).
    [Show full text]
  • Gold in Mongolia. Overview of Value Chain from Mine to Fine Gold
    GOLD IN MONGOLIA Overview of value chain from mine to fine gold jewelry (2nd edition, October 2012) Technical Report prepared by Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) and Mineral Resources Agency of Mongolia (MRAM) Funded by Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) A contribution to the Integrated Mineral Resources Initiative (IMRI) FOREWORD 1 Preface of the Director General of MRAM Cooperation between Governments of Mongolia and Germany in the field of geology and mining dates back many years and is rich in historic milestones. A successful cooperation between the Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia, which is the implementing agency of the Government of Mongolia, and the Federal Institute of Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) is the implementation of the project “Capacity Building of MRAM”. Within the framework of the joint project, a thorough study was carried out on the gold value chain from mine to jewelry, identifying the present day situation and its challenges. The study is an important document describing the development of the sector and its publication coincides with the year in which Mongolia’s mining sector celebrates its 90th anniversary. My gratitude and acknowledgements to the staff of the Federal Institute of Geosciences and Natural Resources, Germany, for cooperating with MRAM to conduct this survey. G.Altansuh Chairman of Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia 2 FOREWORD FOREWORD 3 Preface of the President of BGR Gold has been in the focus of the geoscientific cooperation between to build up a local jewelry industry. The economic impact of nationwide Mongolia and Germany for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Finance Assessment for Mongolia Diversifying Finance for Sustainable Development
    GOVERNMENT OF MONGOLIA Development Finance Assessment for Mongolia Diversifying finance for sustainable development 2018 Development Finance Assessment for Mongolia Diversifying finance for sustainable development 2018 GOVERNMENT OF MONGOLIA Authors: This assessment was prepared by Erlend Nordby (Team Leader) and a team of national consultants based in Mongolia from the Human Development Research and Training Centre, led by Munkhtseren Sharav. The team included U. Myagmarsuren (Consultant), Ms.O.Enkh-Ariunaa (Advisor), G. Battuvshin, Ph.D (Dean, Business Graduate School, MUST), D. Byambasuren, Ph.D (Lecturer, Graduate School, MUST), P. Algirmaa (Researcher, HDRTC), Ts. Bars (Researcher, HDRTC), A. Enkhtuvshin (Consultant), and J.Myagmar (Consultant). Acknowledgements: This Development Finance Assessment (DFA) for Mongolia was made possible by the leadership of the Ministry of Finance, which supported this assessment together with representative members of the oversight team who provided critical observations and guidance during the set up and implementation of this work. Gratitude is also expressed to the Ministry of Environment, the Ministry of Energy, the Bank of Mongolia, and the National Statistics Office for their assistance and willingness to share data and information together with the broad range of development partners, civil society organizations and private sector stakeholders who have also contributed greatly to the report. Technical guidance was also provided by the Asia Pacific Development Effectiveness Facility (AP-DEF),
    [Show full text]
  • PDP-Working Paper
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tatistical Versus Economic Output Gap Measures: Evidence from Mongolia Julia Bersch International Monetary Fund Tara M. Sinclair1 The George Washington University JEL Classification Numbers: E32; C22; C32 Keywords: Blanchard-Quah Decomposition, Nonmineral GDP, Hodrick-Prescott Filter, Christiano-Fitzgerald Filter Abstract This paper compares the output gap estimates based on a number of different methods. We take advantage of the unique properties of the Mongolian economy in order to evaluate the different approaches. We find that an economic measure derived from a Blanchard and Quah-type joint model of output and inflation provides a more robust estimate of the output gap than the traditional statistical decompositions. 1 Corresponding author: [email protected]. We thank Steve Barnett, Fred Joutz, and Leandro Medina for valuable comments and Janice Lee for research assistance. Sinclair thanks the Institute for International Economic Policy for generous support. All remaining errors are ours. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF. I. Introduction The output gap is a key concept in assessing the economic situation and designing appropriate macroeconomic policies. A positive output gap indicates that aggregate demand exceeds aggregate supply while a negative output gap is associated with recession.
    [Show full text]