DOCSLIB.ORG

Strengthening Economic Development Planning and Infrastructure Funding for Mongolia Government Publications Registration Number 11-1051000-000943-04

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strengthening Economic Development Planning and Infrastructure Funding for Mongolia Government Publications Registration Number 11-1051000-000943-04 Presented by the MOEF, Republic of Korea 2018/19 KSP Policy Consultation Report Mongolia Strengthening Economic Development Planning and Infrastructure Funding for Mongolia Government Publications Registration Number 11-1051000-000943-04 2018/19 KSP Policy Consultation Report Strengthening Economic Development Planning Mongolia and Project Performance Assessments in Mongolia 2018/19 KSP Policy Consultation Report Project Title Strengthening Economic Development Planning and Infrastructure Funding for Mongolia Prepared for The Government of Mongolia In Cooperation with ‌Ministry of Finance (MoF), National Development Agency (NDA), Development Bank of Mongolia (DBM) Supported by Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF), Republic of Korea Prepared by Korea Development Institute (KDI) Project Director Sanghoon Ahn, Executive Director, Center for International Development (CID), KDI Youngsun Koh, ‌Executive Director, Global Knowledge Exchange & Development Center, Former Executive Director, CID, KDI Project Manager Changjae Lee, Visiting Senior Fellow, CID, KDI Project Officer Jinha Yoo, Senior Research Associate, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI Jun Hee Kim, Senior Research Associate, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI Senior Advisor Seok Dong Kim, Former Chairman of Financial Services Commission Principal Investigator Myung Ho Park, Professor, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Authors Chapter 1. Myung Ho Park, Professor, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Belguun Enkhmandal, Specialist, MoF Ichinnorov Luvsanvandan, Officer, MoF Chapter 2. Sung Ho Choi, Professor, Kyonggi University Erdenebayar Davaasambuu, Director, NDA Sarantuya Munkhtur, Officer, NDA Chapter 3. Changyong Choi, Professor, KDI School of Public Policy and Management Sukhdelger Sosorbaram, Specialist, MoF Chapter 4. Jongyearn Lee, Professor, KDI School of Public Policy and Management Ochir Lkhagvasuren, Chief Executive Officer, DBM Chapter 5. Younghan Lee, Professor, University of Seoul Takkyung Kim, ‌Deputy Director, Division of Public-Private-Partnerships, Public and Private Infrastructure Investment Management Center, KDI Dulguun Ganzorig, Asset Manager, DBM English Editor Institute of Culture and Arts Translation Government Publications Registration Number 11-1051000-000943-01 ISBN 979-11-5932-455-0 979-11-5932-438-3 (set) Copyright ⓒ 2019 by Ministry of Economy and Finance, Republic of Korea 2018/19 KSP Policy Consultation Report Strengthening Economic Development Planning and Infrastructure Funding for Mongolia Preface Knowledge is an essential ingredient in a country’s economic growth and social development. Of particular importance is government capacity to formulate and implement policies. The global society is making various efforts to promote knowledge sharing between countries and improve their policy capacity to tackle development issues and enhance global prosperity. Indeed, knowledge laid the foundation for Korea’s unprecedented transformation from a poor agro-based economy into a modern industrialized nation with an open and democratic society. Technology transfer from abroad and educational investment helped expand the domestic knowledge stock and made this transformation possible. The Korean government could also accumulate invaluable practical lessons not found in a conventional textbook through the course of development. The Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) of Korea introduced the Knowledge Sharing Program (KSP) in 2004 to share Korea’s development experience with the international community through joint research, policy consultations, and capacity-building activities. Since its inception, the program has played a vital role in supporting socio-economic development of partner countries around the world. Korea Development Institute (KDI) has participated in the KSP since the program’s launch and has been working with more than seventy foreign countries and organizations. KDI, Korea’s leading think-tank with an extensive experience in policy research, has provided solutions to the challenges that partner countries face in a variety of fields, ranging from industrial development to public-sector reform. In the 2018/19 KSP, KDI carried out policy consultation and capacity-building projects with twenty-two partners including three new participants— Belarus, Serbia, and the ASEAN Secretariat. Among these meaningful projects for mutual learning, this one was initiated by the Ministry of Finance (MoF) with the aim of “Strengthening Economic Development Planning and Infrastructure Funding for Mongolia.” Upon the request of the MoF, the MOEF and KDI organized a research team consisting of Mongolian and Korean experts. The team conducted in-depth analysis of internal and external policy environments, identified Mongolia’s key development challenges, and offered policy recommendations and action plans. On behalf of KDI, I would like to express my deepest appreciation to the Government of Mongolia and the MoF for their collaboration in the project. In particular, I would like to extend my profound gratitude to the government of Mongolia for their unwavering support. The completion of this project would not have been possible without their devotion. I also wish to thank the KSP consultation team—Senior Advisor Dr. Seok Dong Kim, Principal Investigator Professor Myung Ho Park, researchers Professor Sung Ho Choi, Professor Changyong Choi, Professor Jongyearn Lee, Professor Younghan Lee and Dr. Takkyung Kim, and local consultants Belguun Enkhmandal, Ichinnorov Luvsanvandan, Erdenebayar Davaasambuu, Sarantuya Munkhtur, Sukhdelger Sosorbaram, Munguntsatsral Boldbayar, Ochir Lkhagvasuren, Dulguun Ganzorig—for producing this report. This project benefited greatly from many others both inside and outside the Mongolian government. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to all who have made valuable contributions to a successful completion of the project. I am also grateful to the Center for International Development of KDI, in particular Executive Director Dr. Sanghoon Ahn, former Executive Director Dr. Youngsun Koh, Project Manager Dr. Changjae Lee, Project Officer Ms. Jinha Yo and Mr. Jun Hee Kim, for their hard work and dedication to the project. I firmly believe that the KSP will serve as a stepping stone to further elevate mutual learning and economic cooperation between Mongolia and Korea, and hope it will contribute to their sustainable development. Jeong Pyo Choi President Korea Development Institute (KDI) Contents 2018/19 KSP with Mongolia ······································································································019 Executive Summary ····················································································································023 Chapter 1 Institutional Set-up and Governance for Integrated Development Planning Summary ····································································································································027 1. Introduction ····························································································································028 1.1. ‌Current Situation and Challenges of Development Policy Planning of Mongolia ······029 1.2. What to Share? ················································································································033 1.3. Mongolia and Korea ········································································································035 2. Economic Development Plan: An Integrated Approach ·······················································039 2.1. History and Concept ·······································································································039 2.2. New Approach ················································································································040 3. Economic Development Plans in Mongolia ··········································································043 3.1. The History of Mongolian Economic Development Policy ···········································043 3.2. New Tool Kit: An Integrated Approach on Mongolian Development Policy Planning ······055 4. Economic Development Plans in Korea ················································································066 4.1. Economic History of Korea ······························································································066 4.2. EDPs in Korea ···················································································································071 5. Policy Recommendations ······································································································075 5.1. The Establishment of an Integrated Framework for EDPs ···········································075 5.2. Political Leadership and Institutional Set-Up ································································076 5.3. Evidence-Based, Empirically Backed Policy Options ·····················································077 5.4. Development of Budgeting and Financial Systems ·······················································078 5.5. Support for Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) ······························································078 5.6. Capacity Development ····································································································079 5.7. Conclusion ······················································································································080 References ··································································································································082
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Financial and Fiscal Policies for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia,” Jointly Prepared by Dr
    1 Financial and Fiscal Polices for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia Policy Research Paper Knowledge Partnership Project Financial and Fiscal Policies for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia March 2004 Korea Development Institute (KDI) Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA) 2 Financial and Fiscal Polices for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia Foreword Knowledge is a critical factor in economic and social development in the 21st century. Knowledge Partnership (KP) Project, a new cooperative framework established between the World Bank and the Korean government has endeavored to bridge the knowledge gap between developed and developing countries by disseminating Korea’s economic development experience. Amid the transition toward a market-based economy, the Mongolian economy is confronted with various challenges in the financial sector, which include weak banking sector, expanding distressed assets, low public trust and ineffective government regulations. This, in turn, increased the risk of financial instability, calling for appropriate policy responses from the government. The policy research paper “Financial and Fiscal Policies for Economic Sustainability in Mongolia,” jointly prepared by Dr. Dongsoo Kang, Dr. Moon Soo Kang, Dr. Seok Kyun Hur from KDI and Dr. Chiho Kim from the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation, offers a comprehensive assessment on the sustainability of economic system in Mongolia. The paper presents in-depth analysis on major issues in financial and fiscal policies including the Non-Performing Loan (NPL) management, deposit protection, non-banking financial institutions, and fiscal sustainability and scrutinizes economic theories in order to provide relevant policy alternatives for the Mongolian government. In addition, the Korean experience as well as international practices was shrewdly reviewed for reference guide.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 an Analysis of the Mongolian Political and Economic Transition: A
    An Analysis of the Mongolian Political and Economic Transition: A Model Democracy with a Promising Future By Enkhtaivan Oyunbazar May, 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in (Economics) in cursu honorum Reviewed and approved by: Dr. Alexander Mirescu Submitted to The Honors Program, Saint Peter’s University March 23, 2015 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank all of the people who have been helpful, supportive, and caring to make this work possible. I am extremely thankful to have a wonderful family, friends, and teachers who have helped me throughout life and continue to support me in any endeavor. Special thanks to the Director of the Honors Program Dr. Rachel Wifall and my advisor for this work Dr. Alexander Mirescu from the Department of Political Science. Abstract Mongolia is a democratic free market-oriented Asian state and it is the second largest land locked country in the world. Located between the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China, Mongolia’s total area of 1.6 million square kilometers encompasses an area greater than that of Britain, France, Germany, and Italy combined; four times the size of Japan. Mongolia is the fifth largest country in Asia and it is also the least densely populated country in the world; the country’s population reached only three million in 2015. Mongolia became the second communist country in the world after the USSR when the Bolsheviks advised the young Mongolian nationalists to establish a Marxist state. Mongolia emerged as a supplier of raw materials and food for the USSR’s Siberian industries and towns leading up to the transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Mongolia
    CPS Final Mongolia Review Validation of the Country Partnership Validation Strategy Final Review, 2017–2020 Independent Evaluation Raising development impact through evaluation Validation Report April 2021 Mongolia: Validation of the Country Partnership Strategy Final Review, 2017–2020 This is a redacted version of the document, which excludes information that is subject to exeptions to disclosure set fourth in ADB’s Access to Information Policy. Independent Evaluation: VR-25 NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Mongolia ends on 31 December. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. (iii) For an explanation of rating descriptions used in ADB evaluation reports, see ADB. 2015. 2015 Guidelines for the Preparation of Country Assistance Program Evaluations and Country Partnership Strategy Final Review Validations. Manila. Director General Marvin Taylor-Dormond, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) Deputy Director General Véronique N. Salze-Lozac'h, IED Director Joanne Asquith, Thematic and Country Division, IED Team leader Tomoo Ueda, Principal Evaluation Specialist, IED Team members Sergio Villena, Evaluation Officer, IED Jullie Ann Palomares, Evaluation Assistant, IED The guidelines formally adopted by the Independent Evaluation Department (IED) on avoiding conflict of interest in its independent evaluations were observed in the preparation of this report. To the knowledge of IED management, there were no conflicts of interest of the persons preparing, reviewing, or approving this report. In preparing any evaluation report, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the IED does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Poverty in Mongolia
    The Problem of Poverty in Mongolia: From Socialism to the Millennium Development Goals by Richard Smith, MFA MSW (Correspondent Author) 120 Haviland Hall School of Social Welfare Berkeley, CA 94720 Phone: (510) 590-7790 Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper traces the evolution of poverty in Mongolia in modernity and closes by highlighting progress towards Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and opportunities raised by Millennium Challenge Accounts (MCA). This paper includes a review of poverty literature content analysis of historical documents, national and multilateral reports. Finally, the paper analyzes data by province from the 2007 Human Development Report to identify longitudinal and geographic trends in development. Although development in 2006 is more dispersed, it is driven almost solely by GDP. Furthermore, there is risk of losing a high baseline in education and health provision. Education needs to be a priority to sustain and improve on existing levels of social development. Keywords: Poverty, Mongolia, Development Acknowlegements: This paper was drafted under the supervision of James Midgely, Ph.D. I would like to thank Sherrill Clark, Ph.D. and Neil Gilbert, Ph.D who commented on drafts. Mongolian Poverty - 2 - Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................3 History and Politics Administrative Organization, Infrastructure and Economic Activity Health and Safety The Mongolian Education and Social
    [Show full text]
  • CAREC COUNTRIES ECONOMIES Overview CAREC REGION: 11 COUNTRIES 320 MILLION POPULATION 16 443 290 SQUARE KILOMETER AREA …BILLION USD ECONOMIC POWER
    EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION CHALLENGES FOR CAREC COUNTRIES DOCTOR, PROFESSOR ENKHBAIGALI BYAMBASUREN CAREC COUNTRIES ECONOMIES Overview CAREC REGION: 11 COUNTRIES 320 MILLION POPULATION 16 443 290 SQUARE KILOMETER AREA …BILLION USD ECONOMIC POWER 10/18/10 This is a Footer ECONOMIC POWERS OF CAREC COUNTRIES ARE DIFFERENT Economic Trade with CAREC GDP, 2017 (billion GDP per GDP growth, Trade with CAREC Country complexiy countries as percent $) capita, 2017 ($) 2017 (%) countries index of total trade AFGANISTAN 19,500,000,000 550.1 2.7 n.a 45.60% 414,500,000$ AZERBAIJAN 40,700,000,000 4 135.1 0.1 -0.65 15.65% 3,596,800,000$ CHINA 12,237,700,000,000 8 827.0 6.9 0.69 1.4% GEORGIA 15,100,000,000 4 045.4 4.8 -0.06 27.8% KAZAKHSTAN 162,900,000,000 9 030.3 4.1 0.09 19.1% KYRGYZ 7,600,000,000 1 220.5 4.6 -0.29 33.6% MONGOLIA 11,400,000,000 3 717.5 5.3 -0.79 76.0% PAKISTAN 305,000,000,000 1 547.9 5.7 -0.86 9.0% TAJIKSTAN 7,100,000,000 801.1 7.6 -1.1 39.0% National Development Institute of Mongolia TURKMENISTAN 37,900,000,000 6 586.6 6.5 -1.2 88.8% 10/18/10UZBEKISTAN 49,700,000,000 1 533.9 5.3 -0.85 28.0% 4 POPULATIONS AND WORKFORCE CAPABILITIES ARE DIFFERENT Human Population number in Country Population GDP GDP per capita Poverty (%) Development poverty Index AFGANISTAN 35,530,000 19,500,000,000 550.1$ 18,887,537 54.5% 0.498 AZERBAIJAN 9,854,000 40,700,000,000 4 135.1$ 501,972 5.4% 0.757 CHINA 1,386,400,000 12,237,700,000,000 8 827.0$ 42,978,245 3.1% 0.752 GEORGIA 3,700,000 15,100,000,000 4 045.4$ 816,432 21.9% 0.780 KAZAKHSTAN 18,000,000 162,900,000,000
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Mongolia in 2015
    2015 Minerals Yearbook MONGOLIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior November 2018 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Mongolia By Meralis Plaza-Toledo Mongolia, a country located in northeast Asia, is bordered Production on the north by Russia and on the south by China. Historically, Mongolia’s economy relied on herding and agriculture, but in In 2015, production of molybdenum (mine output) increased recent times, it has become increasingly reliant on the mining by 28%; gold (mine output), by 27%; copper, by 25%; and sector. In 2015, Mongolia accounted for 3% of the world’s crude petroleum, by 18%. Production of fluorspar decreased by fluorspar production. In addition, the country has extensive 38%, and that of crude steel, by 32%, owing to lower demand deposits of coal, copper, gold, petroleum, and uranium. As of (table 1; Industrials Minerals, 2015; National Statistical Office 2015, the Government was actively taking action to increase of Mongolia, 2016). foreign direct investment (FDI) to stabilize the economy Structure of the Mineral Industry (Mungunzul and Chang, 2016, p. 1; McRae, 2017; World Bank, The, 2017). Table 2 lists Mongolia’s major mineral industry facilities. Most of the producing mining companies in Mongolia were Minerals in the National Economy owned by the state or by joint ventures between international In 2015, the mineral industry in Mongolia contributed companies and the Government of Mongolia, although a few approximately 20% to the country’s gross domestic product companies were wholly owned by foreign investors. (GDP). The mining sector accounted for 78.8% of total exports, Mineral Trade of which coal, copper concentrate, iron ore and concentrate, and crude petroleum constituted about 74% of total exports and 85% In 2015, trade between Mongolia and Russia decreased by of mineral commodity exports.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Powers Competition in the Mining Sector of Mongolia
    SHS Web of Conferences 28, 01137 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20162801137 RPTSS 2015 Foreign powers competition in the mining sector of Mongolia Vladimir Rodionov 1a , Innokentii Aktamov1, Damdin Badaraev2, Timur Badmatsyrenov1, Aleksey Kombaev1, Irina Dorzhieva1 ¹ Buryat State University 670000, Smolina Str. 24a, Ulan-Ude, Russia ² Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies RAS (SB), 670047, Sakhiyanova Str. 6, Ulan-Ude, Russia Abstract. The paper is about the issue of Mongolia cooperation with foreign companies playing an important role in its foreign policy strategy and national security. At the beginning of the 1990s, having proclaimed a "multipillar" policy strategy in relations with the world, Ulaanbaatar tends to follow it in the economic cooperation not willing to give any preference to any country. It creates a situation of competition between foreign companies backed by their states, especially such great powers as Russia, China, the USA. The most tense moment in the struggle for the influence in Mongolia is the rivalry between the different discourses, pretending the exclusive right to nominate the most effective model of cooperation between Mongolia and foreign states in the ore-mining industry. Among the most well-defined discourses, there are three of them. China prefers to define the discourse of "economic feasibility". Western states, as a rule, tend to rely on the discourse of "values community", which includes such concepts as "democracy", "environmentally friendly", "transparency” Russia often uses the "geopolitical" discourse. In spite of the attractiveness and relative effectiveness of the discourse selected by Russia, there are certain limits to its use. Introduction Copper 36 millions of tons Uranium 75 thousands of tons A few years ago modern economy of Mongolia was Iron ore 11 billions of tons going through a boom, linked with the development of Zinc 1 millions of tons the mining industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroeconomic Performance and Policy Challenges at the Subregional Level Chapter 2 2
    MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND POLICY CHALLENGES AT THE SUBREGIONAL LEVEL CHAPTER 2 2 “Asia is undergoing a rapid and strong economic, social, cultural and strategic resurgence — the sum of which is certain to redefine global affairs.” Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, President of Indonesia Macroeconomic Performance and Policy Challenges at the Subregional Level While the developing countries of Asia and the Pacific strengthened their growth performance substantially from 4.7% in 2009 to 8.8% in 2010, this region is so vast and diverse that aggregate figures mask the diversity in performance and challenges being faced at the subregion and country levels. Therefore, this chapter provides a more disaggregated analysis of macroeconomic performance and policy challenges at the subregional level with some details at the country level. In the Survey, the Asia-Pacific region is divided into five geographic subregions, namely East and North-East Asia, North and Central Asia, Pacific, South and South-West Asia and South-East Asia. An overview of the macroeconomic performance and policy challenges of all the subregions is followed by more detailed analysis. 51 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL survey OF ASIA AND THE pacific 2011 Divergent performance of subregions oil revenues have been able to cushion some of the budgetary shortfalls with transfers from State The economic recovery in East and North-East oil funds, while others have had to rely more on Asia strengthened in 2010, while the primary international assistance and are undergoing fiscal channels of recovery tended to differ, reflecting the consolidation in consultation with the International economic diversity in the subregion. Indeed, China Monetary Fund (IMF).
    [Show full text]
  • Gold in Mongolia. Overview of Value Chain from Mine to Fine Gold
    GOLD IN MONGOLIA Overview of value chain from mine to fine gold jewelry (2nd edition, October 2012) Technical Report prepared by Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) and Mineral Resources Agency of Mongolia (MRAM) Funded by Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) A contribution to the Integrated Mineral Resources Initiative (IMRI) FOREWORD 1 Preface of the Director General of MRAM Cooperation between Governments of Mongolia and Germany in the field of geology and mining dates back many years and is rich in historic milestones. A successful cooperation between the Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia, which is the implementing agency of the Government of Mongolia, and the Federal Institute of Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) is the implementation of the project “Capacity Building of MRAM”. Within the framework of the joint project, a thorough study was carried out on the gold value chain from mine to jewelry, identifying the present day situation and its challenges. The study is an important document describing the development of the sector and its publication coincides with the year in which Mongolia’s mining sector celebrates its 90th anniversary. My gratitude and acknowledgements to the staff of the Federal Institute of Geosciences and Natural Resources, Germany, for cooperating with MRAM to conduct this survey. G.Altansuh Chairman of Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia 2 FOREWORD FOREWORD 3 Preface of the President of BGR Gold has been in the focus of the geoscientific cooperation between to build up a local jewelry industry. The economic impact of nationwide Mongolia and Germany for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Finance Assessment for Mongolia Diversifying Finance for Sustainable Development
    GOVERNMENT OF MONGOLIA Development Finance Assessment for Mongolia Diversifying finance for sustainable development 2018 Development Finance Assessment for Mongolia Diversifying finance for sustainable development 2018 GOVERNMENT OF MONGOLIA Authors: This assessment was prepared by Erlend Nordby (Team Leader) and a team of national consultants based in Mongolia from the Human Development Research and Training Centre, led by Munkhtseren Sharav. The team included U. Myagmarsuren (Consultant), Ms.O.Enkh-Ariunaa (Advisor), G. Battuvshin, Ph.D (Dean, Business Graduate School, MUST), D. Byambasuren, Ph.D (Lecturer, Graduate School, MUST), P. Algirmaa (Researcher, HDRTC), Ts. Bars (Researcher, HDRTC), A. Enkhtuvshin (Consultant), and J.Myagmar (Consultant). Acknowledgements: This Development Finance Assessment (DFA) for Mongolia was made possible by the leadership of the Ministry of Finance, which supported this assessment together with representative members of the oversight team who provided critical observations and guidance during the set up and implementation of this work. Gratitude is also expressed to the Ministry of Environment, the Ministry of Energy, the Bank of Mongolia, and the National Statistics Office for their assistance and willingness to share data and information together with the broad range of development partners, civil society organizations and private sector stakeholders who have also contributed greatly to the report. Technical guidance was also provided by the Asia Pacific Development Effectiveness Facility (AP-DEF),
    [Show full text]
  • PDP-Working Paper
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tatistical Versus Economic Output Gap Measures: Evidence from Mongolia Julia Bersch International Monetary Fund Tara M. Sinclair1 The George Washington University JEL Classification Numbers: E32; C22; C32 Keywords: Blanchard-Quah Decomposition, Nonmineral GDP, Hodrick-Prescott Filter, Christiano-Fitzgerald Filter Abstract This paper compares the output gap estimates based on a number of different methods. We take advantage of the unique properties of the Mongolian economy in order to evaluate the different approaches. We find that an economic measure derived from a Blanchard and Quah-type joint model of output and inflation provides a more robust estimate of the output gap than the traditional statistical decompositions. 1 Corresponding author: [email protected]. We thank Steve Barnett, Fred Joutz, and Leandro Medina for valuable comments and Janice Lee for research assistance. Sinclair thanks the Institute for International Economic Policy for generous support. All remaining errors are ours. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF. I. Introduction The output gap is a key concept in assessing the economic situation and designing appropriate macroeconomic policies. A positive output gap indicates that aggregate demand exceeds aggregate supply while a negative output gap is associated with recession.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Challenges for the Mongolian Livestock Production Sub
    Title One step forward, two step (pe)s back : opportunities and challenges for the Mongolian livestock production Sub Title Author Scalisi, Alessandro(Okada, Masahiro) 岡田, 正大 Publisher 慶應義塾大学大学院経営管理研究科 Publication year 2015 Jtitle Abstract Notes 修士学位論文. 2015年度経営学 第3058号 Genre Thesis or Dissertation URL https://koara.lib.keio.ac.jp/xoonips/modules/xoonips/detail.php?koara_id=KO40003001-0000201 5-3058 慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)に掲載されているコンテンツの著作権は、それぞれの著作者、学会または出版社/発行者に帰属し、その権利は著作権法によって 保護されています。引用にあたっては、著作権法を遵守してご利用ください。 The copyrights of content available on the KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources (KOARA) belong to the respective authors, academic societies, or publishers/issuers, and these rights are protected by the Japanese Copyright Act. When quoting the content, please follow the Japanese copyright act. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 慶應義塾大学大学院経営管理研究科修士課程 学位論文（ 2015 年度） 論文題名 One Step Forward, Two Step(pe)s Back: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mongolian Livestock Production 主 査 岡田 正大 副 査 坂爪 裕 副 査 浅川 和宏 副 査 学籍番号 81430607 氏 名 Alessandro Scalisi 論文要旨 岡田正大 研究会 学籍番号 81430607 氏名 Alessandro Scalisi 所属ゼミ （論文題名） One Step Forward, Two Step(pe)s Back: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mongolian Livestock Production （内容の要旨） This thesis is a study about Mongolia’s potential as a livestock product exporter. Mongolia’s economy is heavily dependent on mineral exports, making the country vulnerable to commodity prices volatility. At the same time, its national herd (livestock number) is over 40,000,000, while the human population of the country is only 3,000,000. China, which shares its longest border with Mongolia, is a net importer of beef and lamb, and the same can be said about other East Asian countries, such as South Korea and Japan.
    [Show full text]