Open-File Map OFM 125, Geology of the Bridgeton Quadrangle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open-File Map OFM 125, Geology of the Bridgeton Quadrangle DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Prepared in cooperation with the GEOLOGY OF THE BRIDGETON QUADRANGLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CUMBERLAND AND SALEM COUNTIES, NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL AND WATER SURVEY NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM OPEN-FILE MAP OFM 125 Pamphlet containing tables 1 and 2 accompanies map o 75 15’ B 12’30” INTRODUCTION delta and nearshore deposits) indicates that the Cohansey was deposited infilled sand and clay pits. Small areas of fill in urban areas are not MANASQUAN FORMATION—Clay with a trace of glauconite and MAP SYMBOLS o ! ELMER o Tmq 39 30’ !! 10’ 75 07’30” 2 ! ! during several rises and falls of sea level during a period of overall rising sea mapped. shells, gray to olive gray. In subsurface only. Approximately 100 feet ! Qtu 3 4 ! Tb . ! o Tb Tchs Tb 1 5 60 Qtu ! Qtu 75 ! Qals 39 30’ The Bridgeton quadrangle is in the New Jersey Coastal Plain in the southern level. thick based on thickness in the Millville corehole (Sugarman and others, Contact of surficial deposits—Solid where well-defined by landforms as Seabrook Tb ! Qtu Qtu ! ! . 76 ! Qals 74 . ! . part of the state. Outcropping geologic materials in the quadrangle include TRASH FILL—Trash mixed and covered with clay, silt, sand, and minor 2005). Penetrated in wells 176 and 207, but base of Manasquan cannot be visible on 1:12,000 stereo airphotos and LiDAR imagery, dashed where Foster Run Tb Tb 49 ! ! ! Qtu 77 aft ! gravel. As much as 50 feet thick. Qtu Tchs 8 ! 6 . 72 Qtl surficial deposits of late Miocene to Holocene age that overlie the Cohansey Fossil leaves and seed pods were collected from iron-cemented sand near positively identified from the logs for these wells. Of early Eocene age approximately located, short-dashed where feathering or gradational, ! ! .26 ! Qtu Qtu Qtu 50 51 !71 ! Formation, a coastal marine deposit of middle to late Miocene age. The Mary Elmer Lake in Bridgeton (N. J. Geological and Water Survey permanent based on foraminifers and calcareous nannoplankton in the Millville dotted where excavated. In excavations, contacts are drawn to the base Branch Tchs 9! ! 78 ! WETLAND AND ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS—Fine-to-medium sand and ! ! ! 79 surficial deposits include river, wetland, estuarine, and windblown sediments. note 34-4-958, 1939), and possibly from other locations in the Bridgeton area corehole (Sugarman and others, 2005). map topography, compiled in 1953. Marsh ! 70 Qals Qtu The Cohansey Formation includes beach, nearshore, bay, and marsh (Hollick, 1892). The sand beds are either in the upper part of the Cohansey or pebble gravel, minor coarse sand; light gray, yellowish-brown, brown, ! ! Tb Tb Qtu3/Tb Qals ! aft ! dark brown; overlain in places by brown to dark brown organic silt to Lummis Tchs ! ! 48 ! ! 73 sediments deposited when sea level was, at times, more than 100 feet higher lower part of the Bridgeton Formation. The leaf fossils include magnolia, REFERENCES Contact of Cohansey facies—Approximately located. Run ! Tb ! 7 ! . than at present in this region. As sea level lowered after the Cohansey was laid holly, sweetgum, blackgum, oak, chestnut, and palm (Hollick, 1892, 1896, clayey silt and brown to black peat and gyttja (gel-like organic mud). Rosenhayn 47. Tb ! Tb Qtu 46 Qtu 45! !66 down, rivers flowing on the emerging Coastal Plain deposited the Bridgeton 1897). They indicate a subtropical climate and a fluvial or freshwater wetland Peat is as much as 10 feet, but generally less than 4 feet, thick. Sand and Buell, M. F., 1970, Time of origin of New Jersey Pine Barrens bogs: Bulletin Tchc Concealed Cohansey Formation facies—Covered by surficial deposits. Loper Qtu ! ! ! ! 61 ! ! ! Formation, forming a broad regional river plain. With continued lowering of depositional setting. If they are in the Cohansey they indicate a period of gravel are chiefly quartz with a trace (<1%) of chert and are generally of the Torrey Botanical Club, v. 97, p. 105-108. Qtu 44 52! 53 Qtu2/ 68 . ! !! ! Tchs ! ! ! sea level, the regional river system shifted to the west of the quadrangle, and subaerial fluvial, freshwater wetland, or freshwater estuarine deposition. less than 3 feet thick. Sand and gravel are stream-channel deposits; peat Carter, C. H., 1972, Miocene-Pliocene beach and tidal flat sedimentation, 5 Material penetrated by hand-auger hole or observed in exposure or Qtu ! 43 ! 54 59 Tb4/Tchc Qtu ! 42 and gyttja form from the vertical accumulation and decomposition of ! 10 ! 69 local streams began to erode into the Bridgeton plain. Through the latest southern New Jersey: Ph. D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, excavation. Number indicates thickness of surficial material, in feet, ! 41 ! ! . Qe3/Tb ! 67! Miocene, Pliocene, and Quaternary, stream and estuarine sediments were SURFICIAL DEPOSITS AND GEOMORPHIC HISTORY plant debris in swamps and marshes. In floodplains and alluvial wetlands Baltimore, Maryland, 186 p. 11. where penetrated. Symbols without a thickness value within surficial Run ! ! Tb 27 . Qtu deposited in several stages as valleys were progressively deepened and on modern valley bottoms. Carter, C. H., 1978, A regressive barrier and barrier-protected deposit: deposits indicate that the surficial material is more than 5 feet thick. Qtu . ! ! 32 63 ! 80 ! 12 ! ! Qtu ! Cromwell Qe 55 ! ! widened by stream erosion. Sea level in the New Jersey region began a long-term decline following depositional environments and geographic setting of the late Tertiary Where more than one unit was penetrated, the thickness (in feet) of the 14 ! 62 ! 81 ! ! . Tb Qtu ! Qals 13 ! ! deposition of the Cohansey Formation. As sea level lowered, the inner TIDAL MARSH AND ESTUARINE DEPOSITS—Peat, clay, silt, fine Cohansey Sand: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 40, p. 933-950. upper unit is indicated next to its symbol and the lower unit is identified ! Qe ! ! .64 Qm Lebanon Qe3/Tb ! Summaries of the groundwater and material resources, the stratigraphy of the continental shelf emerged as a coastal plain. River drainage was established sand; brown, dark brown, gray, black; minor medium-to-coarse sand and deVerteuil, Laurent, 1997, Palynological delineation and regional correlation following the slash. ! Qtu on this plain. The Bridgeton Formation (Tb) is fluvial sand and gravel that is pebble gravel. Contain abundant organic matter and shells. As much as Qtu ! Kirkwood and Cohansey formations, and the geomorphic history as recorded of lower through upper Miocene sequences in the Cape May and Atlantic Sunset ! 56! 18 33 ! Tb by surficial deposits and landforms, are provided below. The age of the the earliest record of this drainage in the Bridgeton quadrangle. The Bridgeton 20 feet thick (estimated). Deposited in tidal marshes, tidal flats, and tidal City boreholes, New Jersey Coastal Plain, in Miller, K.G., and Snyder, S. Material formerly observed—Recorded in N. J. Geological and Water Lake Qtu ! !! ! 39 ! ! Tchs ! 19 17 . ! 57 82 deposits and episodes of valley erosion are shown on the correlation chart. river system deposited a broad braidplain across southern New Jersey south of channels during Holocene sea-level rise. W., eds., Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, v. Survey files. Abbreviations as above. 20 . 16 15 37 .65 Branch ! ! ! Table 1 (in pamphlet) lists the formations penetrated in selected wells and test the present-day Mullica River. This plain covered the entire quadrangle. 150X: College Station, Texas, Ocean Drilling Program, p. 129-145. 31 35!. ! . 83 36 58 85 ! ! figure 5 Tchs ! ! 40 ! 84 borings as interpreted from drillers’ descriptions and geophysical logs. Table Regionally, paleoflow indicators and slope of the plain indicate that the DRY VALLEY ALLUVIUM—Fine-to-medium sand and pebble gravel, Florer, L. E., 1972, Palynology of a postglacial bog in the New Jersey Pine ! Photograph location Qtu ! 34 ! ! Qald Tb ! Qtu ! c Fields Carmel Qals Qtu ! ! 2 (in pamphlet) provides lithologic and gamma-ray logs for two 100-foot test Bridgeton was deposited by a river system draining southeastward from what minor coarse sand. Sand and gravel are chiefly quartz with a trace (<1%) Barrens: Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, v. 99, p. 135-138. Branch Qtu4/Tb 86 Indian 23 ! 87 of chert. As much as 5 feet thick. In dry headwater channels. ! Qals . borings drilled during mapping. is now the lower Delaware River valley (Owens and Minard, 1979; Martino, French, H. M., Demitroff, M., Forman, S. L., and Newell, W. L., 2007, A Well or test boring—Location accurate to within 200 feet. Log of ! Qtu 47 Chatfield Branch 22 Tb ! 88 1981; Stanford, 2010). Cross beds in sand exposed at six locations in the chronology of late-Pleistocene permafrost events in southern New Jersey, formations penetrated shown in table 1. Logs of borings Bridgeton 1 and ! Bridgeton ! Cross sections AA’ and BB’ show materials to a depth of between 500 and Bridgeton Formation in the quadrangle (plotted on map) likewise record EOLIAN DEPOSITS—Fine-to-medium quartz sand; very pale brown, eastern U. S. A.: Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, v. 18, p. 49-59. Bridgeton 2 are in table 2. ! 28 89 Qe Qtu 21 ! ! 38 ! ! Tb ! ! 90 ! ! ! ! 600 feet, which includes the Cohansey Formation, the Kirkwood Formation, eastward and southeastward paleoflow. The topography of the base of the yellow. As much as 10 feet thick. Form areas of small, low dunes of Friedman, Melvin, 1954, Miocene orthoquartzite from New Jersey: Journal of ! 92 . ! 29. 30 indistinct form. Sand is from wind erosion of the Bridgeton Formation . ! ! the Shark River Formation, and the Manasquan Formation. Formations below Bridgeton Formation, based on outcrop and well data (red lines on fig. 2), Sedimentary Petrology, v. 24, p. 235-241. Well or test boring—Location accurate to within 500 feet. Log of Tb 24 ! ! 91 ! 74 Tchs ! ! 93 188 the Kirkwood were penetrated in ten wells (wells 2, 7, 127, 176, 207, 213, shows that it aggraded in shallow south- to southeast-draining valleys cut into and upper terrace deposits.
Recommended publications
  • Prepared in Cooperation with the Trenton, New Jersey August 1982
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DRAINAGE AREAS IN NEW JERSEY: DELAWARE RIVER BASIN AND STREAMS TRIBUTARY TO DELAWARE BAY By Anthony J. Velnich OPEN-FILE REPORT 82-572 Prepared in cooperation with the UNITED STATES ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT and the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Trenton, New Jersey August 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to District Chief, Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey Room 430, Federal Building 402 East State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08608 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction--- - ---- -- --- ---- -- - - -- -- 1 Determination of drainage areas 3 Explanation of tabular data- 3 References cited 5 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing location of Delaware River basin and Delaware Bay drainage divides in New Jersey 2 TABLES Table 1. Drainage areas at stream mouths in New Jersey, in the Delaware River basin, including tributaries to Delaware Bay 6 2.--Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware River- 15 3. Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware Bay 41 FACTORS FOR CONVERTING INCH-POUND UNITS TO INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM UNITS (SI) For those readers who may prefer to use the International System (SI) units rather than inch-pound units, the conversion factors for the terms used in this report are listed below: Multiply inch-pound unit By To obtain SI unit feet (ft) 0.3048 meters (m) miles (mi) 1 .609 kilometers (km) square miles 2.590 square kilometers (mi 2 ) (km 2 ) II ABSTRACT Drainage areas of New Jersey streams tributary to the Delaware River and Delaware Bay are listed for over 1,100 sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Estuary Promotes the Estuary As a 4 I a E MA S HR L Y H 601 R R a R S O a R N E O D Regional Resource Through Public Education and Outreach
    CE NT C o 540 BE E ROAD h H D R ROA a D AL A n A RMO s 'S IELD e RF D LANE y DEE I ST STRIC W NY WE 77 POLK a 77 t 540 T HVILLE RO e D COHANSEY T r A MILL R OR s R h D N 7 OAD . WEBER R D. e 635 N. P d 6 AVE. D SEELEY B A 663 A 553 HAYN TON RO o OAD RSONA u BRIDGET EN G R C n RO ON AV. ROS A N I KE d LD L a IE G W H RF r EST IVE EE R ERD. PARK DR HARMONY - D 19 BUR y 689 D. H AD CR O SEABROOK SHILO R A . U R R . E F Z MONY RD. D OAD A 612 GE R ROAD UF N FOX Y PARS NA R Bridgeton FOST 2 E O T RO L TAV E S E E E A D E City S Seeley R D E WOOD W RR T INDIANSTREET Lake 606 ROA 18 Park 624 D KROAD H D. A H NER RO T MOORE'S COR FINLE BIG OA 0123 617 OL Y R ROAD DUB D ROAD ROAD UREL S 49 D OA ING OIS ROA NO A 635 661 17 16 L 77 Lake 617 77 DS ERTON AR H SCALE IN MILES RNER R R RICH T O O R ET Arrowhead RUN C OAD ENT AD R D O IRVING AVE. BIA C COOK ROAD COLUM N S D EELEY RO AD T STRE AD 553 E 607 RO 704 L A LAKE L E O TT SILVE R MI R R IKE W T Silver Lake 553 ES S BANK B LOVE 'S T 626 LANE N ROAD EEB IN 49 RL LANE E C 21 BARRE V 49 O 602 AVENU OM AR M EA22 T BUCK E P E N MILL RD .
    [Show full text]
  • Historic District National Register Nomination
    FHR-8-300 (11-78> United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service For HCRS usese onlonly H National Register of Historic Places received SEP 14: Inventory— Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries — complete applicable sections 1. Name Bridgeton Historic District and/or common 2. Location K WL t^ (j«jr\ /< j /'e street & number Irregular pattern (see map attached) N/A. not for publication ' 6^ 1 So S city, town Bridgeton N/A . vicinity of congressional district 2nd state New Jersey code 34 county Cumberland code 011 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use x district public X occupied agriculture museum builcHng($) private X unoccupied commercial structure _ X. both work in progress educational ^ private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment X religious object in process yes: restricted __ government scientific being considered X yes: unrestricted X industrial __ transportation N/A no military other; 4. Owner of Property name Multiple Ownership ( more -than 50 owners'^) street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Cumberland County Court House street & number West Broad Street Bridgeton city, town state- New Jersey 6. Representation in Existing Surveys__________ Potter's Tavern, Saml. Seeley House, Stranger Law Office, Woodruff-Lee House, Buck-Elmer title House, Robert Elmer House, First has this property been determined eligible? ——yes _X_no Presbyterian Church, Gen. Giles House* date various 1936-1962 _?_ federal __ state __county __local depository for survey records Librar? of Congress city, town Washington state D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Resource Inventory
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY FOR UPPER DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NEW JERSEY MAY 18, 2006 Prepared for: Upper Deerfield Township Environmental Commission Prepared by: Amy S. Greene Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4 Walter E. Foran Boulevard, Suite 209 Flemington, New Jersey 08822 This document was prepared with the aid of a Smart Growth Planning Grant from the Association of New Jersey Environmental Commissions ASGECI Project #2517 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page # 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 HISTORY ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Local History.................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Historic Preservation..................................................................................... 4 2.3 Significant Trees.............................................................................................6 2.4 Historic Roads................................................................................................ 6 3.0 CLIMATOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 7 4.0 GEOLOGY................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Physiography.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Bayshore
    322 Comm. Barry Bridge 27 Rt. 130 REPAUPO 620 Exit 26 14 Interstate 295 WOODBURY PEDRICK- Raccoon Creek ©2017 TOWN DELAWARE RIVER Exit Rt. 130 10 Delaware Oldmans Creek Mem. Bridge Interstate 295 N.J. Turnpike This map was drafted by the Cape May Bird Observatory to help you Rt. 40 explore the extraordinary birding possibilities of New Jersey’s Delaware 540 Bayshore. Enjoy your visit. Promote conservation by using local businesses FORT MOTT 23 630 Rt. 40 and voicing your interest in seeing this area kept natural. Be respectful of STATE Rt. 49 25 the rights of landowners and people who are engaged in other PARK Mannington Marsh outdoor pursuits. 24 SHARPTOWN WOODSTOWN 632 Leesburg 540 Details for Heislerville, River Mackeys Salem #11 on larger map County Rd 616 Rt. 45 Lane SALEM 22 River Rd 624 Parking for Alloways Rt. 49 CMBO Creek 623 walks Menhaden Rd Route 47 HANCOCK'S County Rd 616 BRIDGE HARMERSVILLE Earth Dike Maurice River P Matts Landing Rd 667 Main St / CANTON Heislerville Clamshell Co. Rd 616 Parking Lot Stow Creek 21 Glade Rd Rt. 49 Co. Rd 616 / 623 639 Heislerville Fish East Point Rd and Wildlife Stow Creek Management Area Sunset 607 Lake 19 642 New Jersey Audubon’s Cape May Bird Observatory GREENWICH BRIDGETON BAYSIDE 20 has two centers, clearly marked towards the foot of Rt. 49 Cohansey River this map. Both facilities are designed to meet the Rt. 55 information and equipment needs of both its members, 17 18 553 and visiting birders. Your visit and membership are cordially invited to help us promote wildlife conser- 601 FAIRTON vation and education efforts in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohansey Aquifer System, Upper Maurice River Basin Area, New Jersey
    Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Ground-Water Withdrawals, Kirkwood- Cohansey Aquifer System, Upper Maurice River Basin Area, New Jersey By Stephen J. Cauller and Glen B. Carleton Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5258 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and scope ...............................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLES and SKIRMISHES of the American Revolution in New Jersey
    BATTLES AND SKIRMISHES of the American Revolution in New Jersey by David C. Munn Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Munn, David C 1941- Battles and skirmishes of the American Revolution in New Jersey. 1. New Jersey – History – Revolution, 1775-1783. I. Title. E263.N5M85 973.3'3'09747 76-43103 ©Copyright 1976 Bureau of Geology and Topography, Department of Environ- mental Protection. All rights reserved. ". When Howe victorious our weak armies chased, And, sure of conquest, laid Cesarea waste, . " Philip Freneau, An Address The original "Battles and Skirmishes" map was researched and drawn in 1945 by John D. Alden, then Historian of the New Jersey Society of the Sons of the American Revolution. In 1965 D. Stanton Hammond made additions and revisions for the society. It was Hammond who brought the map to the attention of the Bureau of Geology and Topography and the Bureau of Archives and History with the suggestion that it be produced for the Bicen- tennial. The Bureau of Archives and History provided the research, using Alden's original files as a starting point. The Bureau of Geol- ogy and Topography provided the draftsman and the technical car- topographic assistance. The intention of the map is to suggest the approximate sites of the various battles and skirmishes that occurred during the Revo- lutionary War rather than to pinpoint the exact locations. Along the same lines, this pamphlet will provide only brief descriptions of the actions, adding bibliographic references for more detailed information. The actual number of violent events that occurred in New Jersey during the Revolutionary War years can never be determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Themes and Resources Within the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail : Southern
    [29.74:N42j Historic Themes and Resou... NOV 2'o I1K1 ORIC THEMES AND RESOURC £LEMSOfc Clemson Universit within the 3 1604 019 773 722 NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAI SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY and the DELAWARE BAY: Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem Counties U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record P.O. Box 37127 Washington, DC 20013-7127 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/historicthemesreOOsebo HISTORIC THEMES AND RESOURCES within the NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAIL SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY and the DELAWARE BAY: Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem Counties by KIMBERLY R. SEBOLD and SARA AMY LEACH U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record P.O. Box 37127 Washington, DC 20013-7127 Cover photograph: View of Cedar Creek dock. Rutgers Collection, no date. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sebold, Kimberly R., 1966- Historic themes and resources within the New Jersey coastal heritage trail : southern New Jersey and the Delaware Bay : Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem counties / by Kimberly Sebold and Sara Amy Leach, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. 1. Historic buildings-New Jersey-New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail. 2. Historic buildings-New Jersey-Cape May County. 3. Historic buildings-New Jersey- Cumberland County. 4. Historic buildings-New Jersey-Salem County. 5. Cape May County (N.J.) -History, Local. 6. Cumberland County (N.J.) -History, Local. 7. Salem County (N.J.) -History, Local. I. Leach, Sara Amy.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment to the Master Plan
    Hopewell Township Environmental Resource Inventory (ERI) Page 8 4.0 GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS 4.1 Geologic Province Hopewell Township is located at 39 441’ N, 75 258’W in the New Jersey Coastal Plain which is part of the larger Atlantic Coastal Plain physiogeographic province. The Atlantic Coastal Plain stretches along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts from Long Island to Mexico and contains one of the most prolific systems of aquifers in the country.1 In New Jersey, the Coastal Plain covers about 4,200 square miles from the Fall Line, Fall Line, the dividing line separating hard Paleozoic metamorphic rocks of the Appalachian Piedmont to the west from the softer, gently dipping Mesozoic and Tertiary sedimentary rocks of the Coastal Plain, to the Atlantic Ocean2. Most of the land is less than 50’ above sea level. The Coastal Plain is surrounded by brackish or salt water and is bound by the Delaware River to the west, Delaware Bay to the south and the Atlantic Ocean to the east. The Coastal Plain surface is divided into drainage basins which contribute runoff to a specific stream and its tributaries. Hopewell lies in the Cohansey River Drainage Basin. 4.2 Geologic Framework The following physiographic and hydro-geologic descriptions are excerpted from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Report on the New Jersey Coastal Plain Area (Vowinkel and Foster, 1981). The New Jersey Coastal Plain is underlain by a wedge shaped mass of unconsolidated sediments composed of clay, silt, sand and gravel. The wedge thins to a featheredge along the Fall Line and attains a thickness of over six-thousand feet (6,000') at the tip of Cape May County, New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface This CD-ROM Summarizes 13 Documents That Establish A
    Planning for the Future: A Summary of Cumberland County Planning Initiatives October 2002 Prepared for the: Cumberland County Department of Planning and Development Prepared by: Orth-Rodgers & Associates, Inc. 80 Cottontail Lane Somerset, NJ 08873 (732) 564-1932 Preface This presentation summarizes 13 documents that establish a strategic plan for Cumberland County. This summary was created in the spring of 2002, as part of a Smart Growth study with the primary goal of promoting economic development in the 11 municipalities comprising the Cumberland Development Corporation (that part of the County lying outside the urban centers). Cumberland County and the City of Bridgeton are partners in this Smart Growth study. When the Cumberland Development Corporation applied for the Smart Growth grant from the State of New Jersey, it was recognized that such a study would not be the first to examine planning issues from a regional perspective. Cumberland County has been involved in numerous studies that offer ideas on how best to care for the land, improve the transportation system, attract jobs for Cumberland County residents, and other important policies that together are intended to protect the quality of life in the County. To improve the accessibility of these planning documents to the public, they have for the first time been gathered and summarized in one place. Ten of the documents were prepared by, or with the active involvement of, the Cumberland County Department of Planning and Development. They have been grouped into the following three
    [Show full text]
  • Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use
    Journal of Extension Volume 54 Number 3 Article 14 6-1-2016 Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use Salvatore S. Mangiafico Rutgers University, [email protected] Kim Bell Cumberland County Department of Health, [email protected] Noah Hetzell Cumberland County Department of Health, [email protected] Recommended Citation Mangiafico, S. S., Bell, K., & Hetzell, N. (2016). Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use. Journal of Extension, 54(3), Article 14. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol54/iss3/14 This Research in Brief is brought to you for free and open access by TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Extension by an authorized editor of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. June 2016 Volume 54 Number 3 Article # 3RIB1 Research In Brief Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use Abstract The Upper Cohansey River Watershed in southwestern New Jersey has a history of being affected by fecal coliform bacteria (FC). A study was undertaken to investigate the environmental factors associated with FC concentration. For 44% of samples taken throughout the watershed in 2012–2013, FC concentration exceeded the benchmark value. FC levels were related to air temperature, river discharge, and land use in stream buffers. Human sources of FC had been eliminated following research results published in 2009. Results of the study reported in this article suggest the need to further investigate wildlife sources of FC and to implement additional mitigation actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative American Shad Habitat Plan for the Delaware River
    The Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative American Shad Habitat Plan for the Delaware River Prepared by: The Nature Conservancy for the Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative Submitted to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission as a requirement of Amendment 3 to the Interstate Management Plan for Shad and River Herring American Shad Habitat Plan for the Delaware River Prepared by: The Nature Conservancy for the Delaware River Basin Fish & Wildlife Management Cooperative Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife • New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife • Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission • New York State Division of Fish, Wildlife and Marine Resources • U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service • National Marine Fisheries Service For: The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Shad and River Herring Management Board January 7, 2021 Approved May 5, 2021 Members of the Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative wish to express our deepest gratitude to Mari-Beth DeLucia and Lyndon DeSalvo of The Nature Conservancy. Simply stated, their exemplary contributions to the management of American Shad will form the foundation for the restoration of American Shad to the Delaware River Basin. Thank you. Introduction The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s (ASMFC) Amendment 3 to the American Shad and River Herring Fishery Management Plan (FMP) requires all states to submit a Habitat Plan for American Shad stocks in their jurisdiction. This report contains specific information for the Delaware River and its tributaries as it relates to habitat for American Shad in New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware and provides an update to the 2014 American Shad Habitat Plan (Plan) for the Delaware River Watershed.
    [Show full text]