DOCSLIB.ORG

Preface This CD-ROM Summarizes 13 Documents That Establish A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preface This CD-ROM Summarizes 13 Documents That Establish A Planning for the Future: A Summary of Cumberland County Planning Initiatives October 2002 Prepared for the: Cumberland County Department of Planning and Development Prepared by: Orth-Rodgers & Associates, Inc. 80 Cottontail Lane Somerset, NJ 08873 (732) 564-1932 Preface This presentation summarizes 13 documents that establish a strategic plan for Cumberland County. This summary was created in the spring of 2002, as part of a Smart Growth study with the primary goal of promoting economic development in the 11 municipalities comprising the Cumberland Development Corporation (that part of the County lying outside the urban centers). Cumberland County and the City of Bridgeton are partners in this Smart Growth study. When the Cumberland Development Corporation applied for the Smart Growth grant from the State of New Jersey, it was recognized that such a study would not be the first to examine planning issues from a regional perspective. Cumberland County has been involved in numerous studies that offer ideas on how best to care for the land, improve the transportation system, attract jobs for Cumberland County residents, and other important policies that together are intended to protect the quality of life in the County. To improve the accessibility of these planning documents to the public, they have for the first time been gathered and summarized in one place. Ten of the documents were prepared by, or with the active involvement of, the Cumberland County Department of Planning and Development. They have been grouped into the following three categories: Infrastructure • Cumberland County Traffic and Transportation Plan: Update 2001 • Cumberland County Bike Trail Study (2000) • Cumberland County Wastewater Management Planning Environment • Cumberland County Delaware Estuary Study (1993) • Recommendations for Managing Land Use Along the Lower Cohansey River (1998) • Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement for the Maurice National Scenic and Recreational River (2001) • Cumberland County Farmland Preservation, Open Space, Parks and Recreation Trust Fund Plan (1996) Economic Development • Cumberland County Economic Development Strategy for Action (2000-2001) • Cumberland County Intermunicipal Empowerment Zone (1998) • Cumberland County Ecotourism Plan (1996) An Introduction to Cumberland County’s Planning Strategy explains how these different planning studies interact, and how together they comprise a planning vision for Cumberland County. Perhaps most importantly, though not included within the scope of this document, Cumberland County continually supports, assists and coordinates with municipal planning efforts and those of other groups active within the county. Several of the summarized plans were prepared at the state level, but have significant impact on Cumberland County. These include: • The New Jersey State Development and Redevelopment Plan (2001) • Coastal Area Facility Review Act (CAFRA) • New Jersey Pinelands Comprehensive Plan The State Plan affects the region by proposing how land should be developed in the future, particularly through mapping “centers” where development and redevelopment should be concentrated. CAFRA and the Pinelands Plan directly regulate how lands in their jurisdictions may be used. These summaries are accompanied by links for important maps and photographs. We hope that these summaries will provide a better understanding of the plans and policies that affect Cumberland County. For more detailed information about the plans after reading these summaries, please contact: Cumberland County Department of Planning and Development 800 East Commerce Street Bridgeton, NJ 08302 (856) 453-2175 An Introduction to Cumberland County's Planning Strategy Cumberland County takes a strategic approach to its planning efforts by targeting specific issues for attention. This has resulted in an ongoing series of plans and documents, spanning back to the Cumberland Plan of 1966, that together serve as a comprehensive plan for the county. In this way the county devotes its resources to current issues, and planning occurs as a timely, dynamic and responsive process. Planning efforts in Cumberland County confront a uniquely appealing set of opportunities as well as a perplexing set of problems compared to the rest of New Jersey and the urbanized northeast corridor. Visitors to the area often remark on the unspoiled nature of our countryside and the charming architecture of our towns. One outside observer commented that even the heaviest traffic in the county (with a few notable exceptions) is only an inconvenience compared to real traffic problems in urban areas. Land values and housing costs remain affordable. Cumberland County is one of the few places in the urbanized northeast where you may see a bald eagle soaring over the downtown areas; mark the seasons by the strawberries and other fresh produce available from local farms; and then enjoy a performance at a theater, all without traveling more than 20 minutes from home. Cumberland County has the natural and cultural resources to support a quality, hometown oriented lifestyle. However, there is also a more problematic aspect to the community. Our small towns and rural communities have social problems; our citizens require modern, efficient infrastructure where they live, work and play; and our children must be provided with a thorough, up-to-date education, and then perhaps, their own opportunities to live and work within the communities in which they grew up. The issues are compounded by several factors: 1) Cumberland County has some of the most distressed neighborhoods in the state; 2) local communities have few, if any, resources to deal with those problems; 3) its smaller population numbers make it hard to gain attention over the more densely populated and higher income areas to our north; and 4) the local economic base historically composed of industries such as manufacturing, glassmaking, textiles and oystering is distressed. Cumberland County needs improvements that would lead to a better quality of life, with more job and educational opportunities. At the same time there are local and statewide pressures to preserve our local environments and cultural heritage. In past studies, the general public has expressed support for open space protection and economic development equally, both receiving favorable ratings from about 60% of the population. A 1994 Cumberland County referendum on establishing an Open Space Trust Fund received support from over 58% of the voters; in a 1996 survey of property owners along the lower Cohansey River 62% agreed with farmland preservation and 63% agreed with economic development along the river; and in a 2001 survey of employers countywide, "a good location for business" and "protected farmland and open space" were ranked as positive characteristics of the county by a majority of the respondents. How can basic needs be met, and communities be maintained and improved, while still preserving natural areas of statewide and even global significance? Striking the right balance is an ever-present goal for county planning efforts. Development and environmental preservation do not have to be mutually exclusive. First and foremost the county works to make the most of its resources and opportunities. Conversely, whenever possible the county attempts to avoid the imposition of more regulations that would restrict opportunities. There's little imperative in discussing growth controls when the vacancy rate in our downtowns is measured in double digits, and the unemployment rate may be as much as double the statewide rate. The primary issues tackled in the county planning process involve public health, safety and welfare, and the provision of everyday needs, such as transportation and wastewater treatment. Then there are planning projects to enhance the quality of life, such as bird watching, bike routes, and cultural festivals. The timing for addressing those issues is determined by governmental leadership, public sentiments, funding availability, and critical situations and opportunities that may arise. Planning efforts in Cumberland County can be grouped into three broad topics: infrastructure, environment and economic development. While the issues may seem unrelated, Cumberland County approaches them with a common goal: using strategic planning to address needs and provide opportunities within our community. The County's ecotourism efforts are an excellent example of using one asset (environmental resources) to address other issues (economic opportunities). The provision of infrastructure, through new wastewater treatment systems, can also generate economic activity. Ecotourists need infrastructure for restaurants and rest rooms, and wastewater planning can thus support ecotourism efforts. The provision of wastewater treatment is also viewed as a key to the redevelopment of our hamlet and town centers, and this is reflected in our involvement with the State Planning process and the Water Quality Management Planning process. Centers cannot succeed without adequate wastewater treatment. Existing development won't remain competitive, and new development won't be attracted or approved. Wastewater management planning should be more responsive to local needs. Ecotourism and wastewater planning illustrate how each plan can be part of a wider vision, and sometimes planning must evolve to fill that role. Transportation and economic development provide another example. Mass transit has the ability to link distressed communities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prepared in Cooperation with the Trenton, New Jersey August 1982
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DRAINAGE AREAS IN NEW JERSEY: DELAWARE RIVER BASIN AND STREAMS TRIBUTARY TO DELAWARE BAY By Anthony J. Velnich OPEN-FILE REPORT 82-572 Prepared in cooperation with the UNITED STATES ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT and the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Trenton, New Jersey August 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to District Chief, Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey Room 430, Federal Building 402 East State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08608 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction--- - ---- -- --- ---- -- - - -- -- 1 Determination of drainage areas 3 Explanation of tabular data- 3 References cited 5 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing location of Delaware River basin and Delaware Bay drainage divides in New Jersey 2 TABLES Table 1. Drainage areas at stream mouths in New Jersey, in the Delaware River basin, including tributaries to Delaware Bay 6 2.--Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware River- 15 3. Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware Bay 41 FACTORS FOR CONVERTING INCH-POUND UNITS TO INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM UNITS (SI) For those readers who may prefer to use the International System (SI) units rather than inch-pound units, the conversion factors for the terms used in this report are listed below: Multiply inch-pound unit By To obtain SI unit feet (ft) 0.3048 meters (m) miles (mi) 1 .609 kilometers (km) square miles 2.590 square kilometers (mi 2 ) (km 2 ) II ABSTRACT Drainage areas of New Jersey streams tributary to the Delaware River and Delaware Bay are listed for over 1,100 sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Estuary Promotes the Estuary As a 4 I a E MA S HR L Y H 601 R R a R S O a R N E O D Regional Resource Through Public Education and Outreach
    CE NT C o 540 BE E ROAD h H D R ROA a D AL A n A RMO s 'S IELD e RF D LANE y DEE I ST STRIC W NY WE 77 POLK a 77 t 540 T HVILLE RO e D COHANSEY T r A MILL R OR s R h D N 7 OAD . WEBER R D. e 635 N. P d 6 AVE. D SEELEY B A 663 A 553 HAYN TON RO o OAD RSONA u BRIDGET EN G R C n RO ON AV. ROS A N I KE d LD L a IE G W H RF r EST IVE EE R ERD. PARK DR HARMONY - D 19 BUR y 689 D. H AD CR O SEABROOK SHILO R A . U R R . E F Z MONY RD. D OAD A 612 GE R ROAD UF N FOX Y PARS NA R Bridgeton FOST 2 E O T RO L TAV E S E E E A D E City S Seeley R D E WOOD W RR T INDIANSTREET Lake 606 ROA 18 Park 624 D KROAD H D. A H NER RO T MOORE'S COR FINLE BIG OA 0123 617 OL Y R ROAD DUB D ROAD ROAD UREL S 49 D OA ING OIS ROA NO A 635 661 17 16 L 77 Lake 617 77 DS ERTON AR H SCALE IN MILES RNER R R RICH T O O R ET Arrowhead RUN C OAD ENT AD R D O IRVING AVE. BIA C COOK ROAD COLUM N S D EELEY RO AD T STRE AD 553 E 607 RO 704 L A LAKE L E O TT SILVE R MI R R IKE W T Silver Lake 553 ES S BANK B LOVE 'S T 626 LANE N ROAD EEB IN 49 RL LANE E C 21 BARRE V 49 O 602 AVENU OM AR M EA22 T BUCK E P E N MILL RD .
    [Show full text]
  • Historic District National Register Nomination
    FHR-8-300 (11-78> United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service For HCRS usese onlonly H National Register of Historic Places received SEP 14: Inventory— Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries — complete applicable sections 1. Name Bridgeton Historic District and/or common 2. Location K WL t^ (j«jr\ /< j /'e street & number Irregular pattern (see map attached) N/A. not for publication ' 6^ 1 So S city, town Bridgeton N/A . vicinity of congressional district 2nd state New Jersey code 34 county Cumberland code 011 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use x district public X occupied agriculture museum builcHng($) private X unoccupied commercial structure _ X. both work in progress educational ^ private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment X religious object in process yes: restricted __ government scientific being considered X yes: unrestricted X industrial __ transportation N/A no military other; 4. Owner of Property name Multiple Ownership ( more -than 50 owners'^) street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Cumberland County Court House street & number West Broad Street Bridgeton city, town state- New Jersey 6. Representation in Existing Surveys__________ Potter's Tavern, Saml. Seeley House, Stranger Law Office, Woodruff-Lee House, Buck-Elmer title House, Robert Elmer House, First has this property been determined eligible? ——yes _X_no Presbyterian Church, Gen. Giles House* date various 1936-1962 _?_ federal __ state __county __local depository for survey records Librar? of Congress city, town Washington state D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Resource Inventory
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY FOR UPPER DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NEW JERSEY MAY 18, 2006 Prepared for: Upper Deerfield Township Environmental Commission Prepared by: Amy S. Greene Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4 Walter E. Foran Boulevard, Suite 209 Flemington, New Jersey 08822 This document was prepared with the aid of a Smart Growth Planning Grant from the Association of New Jersey Environmental Commissions ASGECI Project #2517 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page # 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 HISTORY ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Local History.................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Historic Preservation..................................................................................... 4 2.3 Significant Trees.............................................................................................6 2.4 Historic Roads................................................................................................ 6 3.0 CLIMATOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 7 4.0 GEOLOGY................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Physiography.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Bayshore
    322 Comm. Barry Bridge 27 Rt. 130 REPAUPO 620 Exit 26 14 Interstate 295 WOODBURY PEDRICK- Raccoon Creek ©2017 TOWN DELAWARE RIVER Exit Rt. 130 10 Delaware Oldmans Creek Mem. Bridge Interstate 295 N.J. Turnpike This map was drafted by the Cape May Bird Observatory to help you Rt. 40 explore the extraordinary birding possibilities of New Jersey’s Delaware 540 Bayshore. Enjoy your visit. Promote conservation by using local businesses FORT MOTT 23 630 Rt. 40 and voicing your interest in seeing this area kept natural. Be respectful of STATE Rt. 49 25 the rights of landowners and people who are engaged in other PARK Mannington Marsh outdoor pursuits. 24 SHARPTOWN WOODSTOWN 632 Leesburg 540 Details for Heislerville, River Mackeys Salem #11 on larger map County Rd 616 Rt. 45 Lane SALEM 22 River Rd 624 Parking for Alloways Rt. 49 CMBO Creek 623 walks Menhaden Rd Route 47 HANCOCK'S County Rd 616 BRIDGE HARMERSVILLE Earth Dike Maurice River P Matts Landing Rd 667 Main St / CANTON Heislerville Clamshell Co. Rd 616 Parking Lot Stow Creek 21 Glade Rd Rt. 49 Co. Rd 616 / 623 639 Heislerville Fish East Point Rd and Wildlife Stow Creek Management Area Sunset 607 Lake 19 642 New Jersey Audubon’s Cape May Bird Observatory GREENWICH BRIDGETON BAYSIDE 20 has two centers, clearly marked towards the foot of Rt. 49 Cohansey River this map. Both facilities are designed to meet the Rt. 55 information and equipment needs of both its members, 17 18 553 and visiting birders. Your visit and membership are cordially invited to help us promote wildlife conser- 601 FAIRTON vation and education efforts in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohansey Aquifer System, Upper Maurice River Basin Area, New Jersey
    Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Ground-Water Withdrawals, Kirkwood- Cohansey Aquifer System, Upper Maurice River Basin Area, New Jersey By Stephen J. Cauller and Glen B. Carleton Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5258 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and scope ...............................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLES and SKIRMISHES of the American Revolution in New Jersey
    BATTLES AND SKIRMISHES of the American Revolution in New Jersey by David C. Munn Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Munn, David C 1941- Battles and skirmishes of the American Revolution in New Jersey. 1. New Jersey – History – Revolution, 1775-1783. I. Title. E263.N5M85 973.3'3'09747 76-43103 ©Copyright 1976 Bureau of Geology and Topography, Department of Environ- mental Protection. All rights reserved. ". When Howe victorious our weak armies chased, And, sure of conquest, laid Cesarea waste, . " Philip Freneau, An Address The original "Battles and Skirmishes" map was researched and drawn in 1945 by John D. Alden, then Historian of the New Jersey Society of the Sons of the American Revolution. In 1965 D. Stanton Hammond made additions and revisions for the society. It was Hammond who brought the map to the attention of the Bureau of Geology and Topography and the Bureau of Archives and History with the suggestion that it be produced for the Bicen- tennial. The Bureau of Archives and History provided the research, using Alden's original files as a starting point. The Bureau of Geol- ogy and Topography provided the draftsman and the technical car- topographic assistance. The intention of the map is to suggest the approximate sites of the various battles and skirmishes that occurred during the Revo- lutionary War rather than to pinpoint the exact locations. Along the same lines, this pamphlet will provide only brief descriptions of the actions, adding bibliographic references for more detailed information. The actual number of violent events that occurred in New Jersey during the Revolutionary War years can never be determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Open-File Map OFM 125, Geology of the Bridgeton Quadrangle
    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Prepared in cooperation with the GEOLOGY OF THE BRIDGETON QUADRANGLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CUMBERLAND AND SALEM COUNTIES, NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL AND WATER SURVEY NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM OPEN-FILE MAP OFM 125 Pamphlet containing tables 1 and 2 accompanies map o 75 15’ B 12’30” INTRODUCTION delta and nearshore deposits) indicates that the Cohansey was deposited infilled sand and clay pits. Small areas of fill in urban areas are not MANASQUAN FORMATION—Clay with a trace of glauconite and MAP SYMBOLS o ! ELMER o Tmq 39 30’ !! 10’ 75 07’30” 2 ! ! during several rises and falls of sea level during a period of overall rising sea mapped. shells, gray to olive gray. In subsurface only. Approximately 100 feet ! Qtu 3 4 ! Tb . ! o Tb Tchs Tb 1 5 60 Qtu ! Qtu 75 ! Qals 39 30’ The Bridgeton quadrangle is in the New Jersey Coastal Plain in the southern level. thick based on thickness in the Millville corehole (Sugarman and others, Contact of surficial deposits—Solid where well-defined by landforms as Seabrook Tb ! Qtu Qtu ! ! . 76 ! Qals 74 . ! . part of the state. Outcropping geologic materials in the quadrangle include TRASH FILL—Trash mixed and covered with clay, silt, sand, and minor 2005). Penetrated in wells 176 and 207, but base of Manasquan cannot be visible on 1:12,000 stereo airphotos and LiDAR imagery, dashed where Foster Run Tb Tb 49 ! ! ! Qtu 77 aft ! gravel. As much as 50 feet thick. Qtu Tchs 8 ! 6 . 72 Qtl surficial deposits of late Miocene to Holocene age that overlie the Cohansey Fossil leaves and seed pods were collected from iron-cemented sand near positively identified from the logs for these wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Themes and Resources Within the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail : Southern
    [29.74:N42j Historic Themes and Resou... NOV 2'o I1K1 ORIC THEMES AND RESOURC £LEMSOfc Clemson Universit within the 3 1604 019 773 722 NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAI SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY and the DELAWARE BAY: Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem Counties U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record P.O. Box 37127 Washington, DC 20013-7127 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/historicthemesreOOsebo HISTORIC THEMES AND RESOURCES within the NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAIL SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY and the DELAWARE BAY: Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem Counties by KIMBERLY R. SEBOLD and SARA AMY LEACH U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record P.O. Box 37127 Washington, DC 20013-7127 Cover photograph: View of Cedar Creek dock. Rutgers Collection, no date. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sebold, Kimberly R., 1966- Historic themes and resources within the New Jersey coastal heritage trail : southern New Jersey and the Delaware Bay : Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem counties / by Kimberly Sebold and Sara Amy Leach, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. 1. Historic buildings-New Jersey-New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail. 2. Historic buildings-New Jersey-Cape May County. 3. Historic buildings-New Jersey- Cumberland County. 4. Historic buildings-New Jersey-Salem County. 5. Cape May County (N.J.) -History, Local. 6. Cumberland County (N.J.) -History, Local. 7. Salem County (N.J.) -History, Local. I. Leach, Sara Amy.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment to the Master Plan
    Hopewell Township Environmental Resource Inventory (ERI) Page 8 4.0 GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS 4.1 Geologic Province Hopewell Township is located at 39 441’ N, 75 258’W in the New Jersey Coastal Plain which is part of the larger Atlantic Coastal Plain physiogeographic province. The Atlantic Coastal Plain stretches along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts from Long Island to Mexico and contains one of the most prolific systems of aquifers in the country.1 In New Jersey, the Coastal Plain covers about 4,200 square miles from the Fall Line, Fall Line, the dividing line separating hard Paleozoic metamorphic rocks of the Appalachian Piedmont to the west from the softer, gently dipping Mesozoic and Tertiary sedimentary rocks of the Coastal Plain, to the Atlantic Ocean2. Most of the land is less than 50’ above sea level. The Coastal Plain is surrounded by brackish or salt water and is bound by the Delaware River to the west, Delaware Bay to the south and the Atlantic Ocean to the east. The Coastal Plain surface is divided into drainage basins which contribute runoff to a specific stream and its tributaries. Hopewell lies in the Cohansey River Drainage Basin. 4.2 Geologic Framework The following physiographic and hydro-geologic descriptions are excerpted from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Report on the New Jersey Coastal Plain Area (Vowinkel and Foster, 1981). The New Jersey Coastal Plain is underlain by a wedge shaped mass of unconsolidated sediments composed of clay, silt, sand and gravel. The wedge thins to a featheredge along the Fall Line and attains a thickness of over six-thousand feet (6,000') at the tip of Cape May County, New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use
    Journal of Extension Volume 54 Number 3 Article 14 6-1-2016 Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use Salvatore S. Mangiafico Rutgers University, [email protected] Kim Bell Cumberland County Department of Health, [email protected] Noah Hetzell Cumberland County Department of Health, [email protected] Recommended Citation Mangiafico, S. S., Bell, K., & Hetzell, N. (2016). Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use. Journal of Extension, 54(3), Article 14. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol54/iss3/14 This Research in Brief is brought to you for free and open access by TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Extension by an authorized editor of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. June 2016 Volume 54 Number 3 Article # 3RIB1 Research In Brief Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use Abstract The Upper Cohansey River Watershed in southwestern New Jersey has a history of being affected by fecal coliform bacteria (FC). A study was undertaken to investigate the environmental factors associated with FC concentration. For 44% of samples taken throughout the watershed in 2012–2013, FC concentration exceeded the benchmark value. FC levels were related to air temperature, river discharge, and land use in stream buffers. Human sources of FC had been eliminated following research results published in 2009. Results of the study reported in this article suggest the need to further investigate wildlife sources of FC and to implement additional mitigation actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative American Shad Habitat Plan for the Delaware River
    The Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative American Shad Habitat Plan for the Delaware River Prepared by: The Nature Conservancy for the Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative Submitted to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission as a requirement of Amendment 3 to the Interstate Management Plan for Shad and River Herring American Shad Habitat Plan for the Delaware River Prepared by: The Nature Conservancy for the Delaware River Basin Fish & Wildlife Management Cooperative Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife • New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife • Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission • New York State Division of Fish, Wildlife and Marine Resources • U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service • National Marine Fisheries Service For: The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Shad and River Herring Management Board January 7, 2021 Approved May 5, 2021 Members of the Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative wish to express our deepest gratitude to Mari-Beth DeLucia and Lyndon DeSalvo of The Nature Conservancy. Simply stated, their exemplary contributions to the management of American Shad will form the foundation for the restoration of American Shad to the Delaware River Basin. Thank you. Introduction The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s (ASMFC) Amendment 3 to the American Shad and River Herring Fishery Management Plan (FMP) requires all states to submit a Habitat Plan for American Shad stocks in their jurisdiction. This report contains specific information for the Delaware River and its tributaries as it relates to habitat for American Shad in New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware and provides an update to the 2014 American Shad Habitat Plan (Plan) for the Delaware River Watershed.
    [Show full text]