Historic District National Register Nomination

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historic District National Register Nomination FHR-8-300 (11-78> United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service For HCRS usese onlonly H National Register of Historic Places received SEP 14: Inventory— Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries — complete applicable sections 1. Name Bridgeton Historic District and/or common 2. Location K WL t^ (j«jr\ /< j /'e street & number Irregular pattern (see map attached) N/A. not for publication ' 6^ 1 So S city, town Bridgeton N/A . vicinity of congressional district 2nd state New Jersey code 34 county Cumberland code 011 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use x district public X occupied agriculture museum builcHng($) private X unoccupied commercial structure _ X. both work in progress educational ^ private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment X religious object in process yes: restricted __ government scientific being considered X yes: unrestricted X industrial __ transportation N/A no military other; 4. Owner of Property name Multiple Ownership ( more -than 50 owners'^) street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Cumberland County Court House street & number West Broad Street Bridgeton city, town state- New Jersey 6. Representation in Existing Surveys__________ Potter's Tavern, Saml. Seeley House, Stranger Law Office, Woodruff-Lee House, Buck-Elmer title House, Robert Elmer House, First has this property been determined eligible? ——yes _X_no Presbyterian Church, Gen. Giles House* date various 1936-1962 _?_ federal __ state __county __local depository for survey records Librar? of Congress city, town Washington state D.C. N.J. Historic Sites Inventory - 1979-1980, Bridgeton Survey, Office of Cultural and Environmental Services 1°9 West State Street, Trenton, NJ 08625__ 7. Description Condition Check e«e Check one x excellent "^^"^Ofrazed unaMewid _JXL_ original site X good ruins x aHemd mowed date x fair imgynoaed Describe ttte present and original fif known} physical appe Bridgeton, New Jersey is unique geographically, architecturally, and socially. Rising to the east and west from the valley of the Cohansey River, Bridgeton is surrounded by an agricultural area of fields and some woodlands. The river, providing power and transportation, and the surrounds, providing abundant produce as well as sand and minerals, made it a natural center for commerce and industry. The early settlers in the late seventeenth and early eighteen centuries made use of the river for sawmills, later inhabitants started iron and woolen mills, and in the nineteenth century can­ ning, glass making and machine industries boomed. Although most of the industries and their structures are now gone, the residential, commercial, and institutional build­ ings which remain attest to the success and stability of Bridgeton in the nineteenth century. Large architect designed buildings, the symbols of the wealth and power of their inhabitants, sit side by side with the more modest A-Front Double as evidence of a cohesive society which contributed not only to its region but to the nation and the world. The proposed National Register District covers some 616 acres and consists of two *^- areas, one large, one small, containing a large part of Bridgeton's commercial center and residential neighborhoods, as well as some industrial sites. The larger section, enclosed by an irregular line, comprises eighteen and nineteenth century residential, commercial, and industrial areas of the city. The smaller sectionis a rough rectangle enclosing a primarily nineteenth century residential area. The two sections are separated by a state highway and a vacant redevelopment site. Bridgeton grew as two villages, one on each side of the Cohansey River. The site was *" unique in that it was surrounded by hills in otherwise flat countryside. Well placed at a point where the river itself is relatively narrow and; unlike areas further upstream and downstream, not surrounded by flood prone marshland, the two villages grew. Cohansey, the village on the west side of the river was laid out in a grid pattern. The village on the east side of the River was simply called "The Bridge" and developed within a narrow strip along East Commerce Street, a road which led away to the east and south from the bridge. Long before the town was incorporated in 1865 the villages were locally labeled as Bridge Town, pronounced Bridgeton. The Bridgeton Historic ^J!)^t:xic±.^nci^ t/ institutional buildings, one major industrial complex, and several archeological sites. There are sixty-seven intrusions within the boundaries of the district. These are generally commercial structures, such as gas stations or "7-11" markets or modern factory and warehouse buildings. The integrity of individual buildings varies, with some virtually perfect examples, and others on which original detail still exists obscured by easily removable modern accretions. The district as a whole has integrity in that it contains the evidence of the entire social and architectural history of Bridgeton. The various elements are unified by common building forms, lot sizes, the tree lined streets, presenting a complete view of a nineteenth century culture. Lots generally run 50' x 150', a tradition established early and still maintained. The large size gives ample room for grass, trees, and other plantings, affording 8. Significance Period Areas off Significance — Check and justify below prehistoric archeology-prehistoric community planning landscape architecture religion 1400-1499 x archeology-historic conservation law science 1500-1599 agriculture economics literature sculpture 1600-1699 x architecture education military social/ _J_ 1700-1 799 art engineering music humanitarian 1800-1899 x commerce exploration/settlement philosophy theater X 1900- communications X industry politics/government X transportation x invention other (specify) N/A Specific dates N/A Builder/Architect Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) Bridgeton is significant because its industrial, architectural, and social heritage is unique. It is a nineteenth century town whose extraordinary diversity of industry and commerce gave it rare economic stability, and whose benevolent paternalism gave it an equally rare social stability. It has a great variety of architectural designs unified by one form, the vernacular A-Front Double House. The history of Bridgeton covers a span of almost three hundred years and its heritage is significant in a number of areas, all of which are represented in the proposed district. The architecture includes examples from the eighteenth century to the twentieth, with a predominance of nineteenth century buildings, both modest and extravagant, by local builders and well known architects, which comprise a textbook of that century's styles. Particularly notable is the local vernacular A-Front Double, which forms the basis for a variety of treatments throughout the nineteenth century. The survey on which this nomination is based did not include archeological investiga­ tion. Some work has already been done by John Milner on the Cumberland Nail and Iron Works site. Other areas probably also have potential, although most of the industrial and commercial sites have undergone so many changes that retrieving clear data may be difficult. The Ferracute Machine Company is the most recently vacated site and has remained relatively undisturbed since it was rebuilt after a fire in 1903. Other possible areas are Mill Town, Indian Fields, and the banks of the river. The areas deemed to have most potential are included in the district. Bridgeton was, in the nineteenth century, the commercial center of West Jersey. It was the trading point for the abundant agricultural produce of the area. Its numerous canning and glass factories sent their wares throughout the nation via river, road, and rail. Its most impressive industry, the Ferracute Machine Company and its founder, the inventor Oberlin Smith, were famous throughout the world, and made significant contributions to manufacturing technology. The first known settler, Richard Hancock, set up a sawmill sometime in the 1680's, and Bridgeton grew steadily, although modestly, throughout the 18th century as two sep­ arate towns, one on each side of the river. The early settlers of the area were migrants from New England in search of a milder physical and spiritual climate. They brought with them a style of architecture - braced frame clapboard box-like buildings - and a strong belief in education and Christian principles. Industrious, thrifty, and conservative, they laid the groundwork for stable commercial and social institu­ tions and early set the cornerstones of churches and schools. They also established the town as the seat of Cumberland County and as an official U.S. Port of Entry. In addition, these early settlers spawned lawyers and doctors who represented the area in state and national government (Drs. Jonathan and Ebenezer Elmer) and distinguished themselves in the Revolutionary War (The Drs. Elmer and Cols. Potter, Buck and Seeley) . The Society of St. Tammany was founded by Dr. Ebenezer Elmer in 1787 at his house on Vine Street. U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1981 0 - 330-456 9. Major Bibliographical References See Continuation Sheet 10. Geographical Data Arrcagc nf nominated property 616 Acreage of area bounded by UTMf s: 935 Quadrangle name Shiloh, Bridgeton, NJ Quadrangle scale 1:24,000 UMT References A I li S\ I 4l 81 d 3i li d I 4| 3| 61 5| 61 5i d |_iJ k Is lo Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing C I li 8| | 4| fr 1| 2, 8, (j | 4( 3| 6, 3| 9, 3, q DJJJ |4 |7 ,9 |7 ,1 ,0 | 14.316,319,9,01 E I 1. 8| |4| 7, 9| 7, 6, q I 4, 3| 6, 2j 8, 5, q FLU I4 I7 i8 I9 |3 .0 1 |4 ,3 |6 ,3 11,4,0 | G I 1. 8| I 4| 7| 8| 4, 5. d 1 4| 3| 6, 4 7i 2, d H|_iJ K I7 i9 I7 »8 i° i 14,316.416^,01 Verbal boundary description and justification See attached map and continuation sheet.
Recommended publications
  • Prepared in Cooperation with the Trenton, New Jersey August 1982
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DRAINAGE AREAS IN NEW JERSEY: DELAWARE RIVER BASIN AND STREAMS TRIBUTARY TO DELAWARE BAY By Anthony J. Velnich OPEN-FILE REPORT 82-572 Prepared in cooperation with the UNITED STATES ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT and the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Trenton, New Jersey August 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to District Chief, Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey Room 430, Federal Building 402 East State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08608 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction--- - ---- -- --- ---- -- - - -- -- 1 Determination of drainage areas 3 Explanation of tabular data- 3 References cited 5 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing location of Delaware River basin and Delaware Bay drainage divides in New Jersey 2 TABLES Table 1. Drainage areas at stream mouths in New Jersey, in the Delaware River basin, including tributaries to Delaware Bay 6 2.--Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware River- 15 3. Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware Bay 41 FACTORS FOR CONVERTING INCH-POUND UNITS TO INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM UNITS (SI) For those readers who may prefer to use the International System (SI) units rather than inch-pound units, the conversion factors for the terms used in this report are listed below: Multiply inch-pound unit By To obtain SI unit feet (ft) 0.3048 meters (m) miles (mi) 1 .609 kilometers (km) square miles 2.590 square kilometers (mi 2 ) (km 2 ) II ABSTRACT Drainage areas of New Jersey streams tributary to the Delaware River and Delaware Bay are listed for over 1,100 sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Estuary Promotes the Estuary As a 4 I a E MA S HR L Y H 601 R R a R S O a R N E O D Regional Resource Through Public Education and Outreach
    CE NT C o 540 BE E ROAD h H D R ROA a D AL A n A RMO s 'S IELD e RF D LANE y DEE I ST STRIC W NY WE 77 POLK a 77 t 540 T HVILLE RO e D COHANSEY T r A MILL R OR s R h D N 7 OAD . WEBER R D. e 635 N. P d 6 AVE. D SEELEY B A 663 A 553 HAYN TON RO o OAD RSONA u BRIDGET EN G R C n RO ON AV. ROS A N I KE d LD L a IE G W H RF r EST IVE EE R ERD. PARK DR HARMONY - D 19 BUR y 689 D. H AD CR O SEABROOK SHILO R A . U R R . E F Z MONY RD. D OAD A 612 GE R ROAD UF N FOX Y PARS NA R Bridgeton FOST 2 E O T RO L TAV E S E E E A D E City S Seeley R D E WOOD W RR T INDIANSTREET Lake 606 ROA 18 Park 624 D KROAD H D. A H NER RO T MOORE'S COR FINLE BIG OA 0123 617 OL Y R ROAD DUB D ROAD ROAD UREL S 49 D OA ING OIS ROA NO A 635 661 17 16 L 77 Lake 617 77 DS ERTON AR H SCALE IN MILES RNER R R RICH T O O R ET Arrowhead RUN C OAD ENT AD R D O IRVING AVE. BIA C COOK ROAD COLUM N S D EELEY RO AD T STRE AD 553 E 607 RO 704 L A LAKE L E O TT SILVE R MI R R IKE W T Silver Lake 553 ES S BANK B LOVE 'S T 626 LANE N ROAD EEB IN 49 RL LANE E C 21 BARRE V 49 O 602 AVENU OM AR M EA22 T BUCK E P E N MILL RD .
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Resource Inventory
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY FOR UPPER DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NEW JERSEY MAY 18, 2006 Prepared for: Upper Deerfield Township Environmental Commission Prepared by: Amy S. Greene Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4 Walter E. Foran Boulevard, Suite 209 Flemington, New Jersey 08822 This document was prepared with the aid of a Smart Growth Planning Grant from the Association of New Jersey Environmental Commissions ASGECI Project #2517 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page # 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 HISTORY ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Local History.................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Historic Preservation..................................................................................... 4 2.3 Significant Trees.............................................................................................6 2.4 Historic Roads................................................................................................ 6 3.0 CLIMATOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 7 4.0 GEOLOGY................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Physiography.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Bayshore
    322 Comm. Barry Bridge 27 Rt. 130 REPAUPO 620 Exit 26 14 Interstate 295 WOODBURY PEDRICK- Raccoon Creek ©2017 TOWN DELAWARE RIVER Exit Rt. 130 10 Delaware Oldmans Creek Mem. Bridge Interstate 295 N.J. Turnpike This map was drafted by the Cape May Bird Observatory to help you Rt. 40 explore the extraordinary birding possibilities of New Jersey’s Delaware 540 Bayshore. Enjoy your visit. Promote conservation by using local businesses FORT MOTT 23 630 Rt. 40 and voicing your interest in seeing this area kept natural. Be respectful of STATE Rt. 49 25 the rights of landowners and people who are engaged in other PARK Mannington Marsh outdoor pursuits. 24 SHARPTOWN WOODSTOWN 632 Leesburg 540 Details for Heislerville, River Mackeys Salem #11 on larger map County Rd 616 Rt. 45 Lane SALEM 22 River Rd 624 Parking for Alloways Rt. 49 CMBO Creek 623 walks Menhaden Rd Route 47 HANCOCK'S County Rd 616 BRIDGE HARMERSVILLE Earth Dike Maurice River P Matts Landing Rd 667 Main St / CANTON Heislerville Clamshell Co. Rd 616 Parking Lot Stow Creek 21 Glade Rd Rt. 49 Co. Rd 616 / 623 639 Heislerville Fish East Point Rd and Wildlife Stow Creek Management Area Sunset 607 Lake 19 642 New Jersey Audubon’s Cape May Bird Observatory GREENWICH BRIDGETON BAYSIDE 20 has two centers, clearly marked towards the foot of Rt. 49 Cohansey River this map. Both facilities are designed to meet the Rt. 55 information and equipment needs of both its members, 17 18 553 and visiting birders. Your visit and membership are cordially invited to help us promote wildlife conser- 601 FAIRTON vation and education efforts in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohansey Aquifer System, Upper Maurice River Basin Area, New Jersey
    Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Ground-Water Withdrawals, Kirkwood- Cohansey Aquifer System, Upper Maurice River Basin Area, New Jersey By Stephen J. Cauller and Glen B. Carleton Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5258 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and scope ...............................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLES and SKIRMISHES of the American Revolution in New Jersey
    BATTLES AND SKIRMISHES of the American Revolution in New Jersey by David C. Munn Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Munn, David C 1941- Battles and skirmishes of the American Revolution in New Jersey. 1. New Jersey – History – Revolution, 1775-1783. I. Title. E263.N5M85 973.3'3'09747 76-43103 ©Copyright 1976 Bureau of Geology and Topography, Department of Environ- mental Protection. All rights reserved. ". When Howe victorious our weak armies chased, And, sure of conquest, laid Cesarea waste, . " Philip Freneau, An Address The original "Battles and Skirmishes" map was researched and drawn in 1945 by John D. Alden, then Historian of the New Jersey Society of the Sons of the American Revolution. In 1965 D. Stanton Hammond made additions and revisions for the society. It was Hammond who brought the map to the attention of the Bureau of Geology and Topography and the Bureau of Archives and History with the suggestion that it be produced for the Bicen- tennial. The Bureau of Archives and History provided the research, using Alden's original files as a starting point. The Bureau of Geol- ogy and Topography provided the draftsman and the technical car- topographic assistance. The intention of the map is to suggest the approximate sites of the various battles and skirmishes that occurred during the Revo- lutionary War rather than to pinpoint the exact locations. Along the same lines, this pamphlet will provide only brief descriptions of the actions, adding bibliographic references for more detailed information. The actual number of violent events that occurred in New Jersey during the Revolutionary War years can never be determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Open-File Map OFM 125, Geology of the Bridgeton Quadrangle
    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Prepared in cooperation with the GEOLOGY OF THE BRIDGETON QUADRANGLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CUMBERLAND AND SALEM COUNTIES, NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL AND WATER SURVEY NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM OPEN-FILE MAP OFM 125 Pamphlet containing tables 1 and 2 accompanies map o 75 15’ B 12’30” INTRODUCTION delta and nearshore deposits) indicates that the Cohansey was deposited infilled sand and clay pits. Small areas of fill in urban areas are not MANASQUAN FORMATION—Clay with a trace of glauconite and MAP SYMBOLS o ! ELMER o Tmq 39 30’ !! 10’ 75 07’30” 2 ! ! during several rises and falls of sea level during a period of overall rising sea mapped. shells, gray to olive gray. In subsurface only. Approximately 100 feet ! Qtu 3 4 ! Tb . ! o Tb Tchs Tb 1 5 60 Qtu ! Qtu 75 ! Qals 39 30’ The Bridgeton quadrangle is in the New Jersey Coastal Plain in the southern level. thick based on thickness in the Millville corehole (Sugarman and others, Contact of surficial deposits—Solid where well-defined by landforms as Seabrook Tb ! Qtu Qtu ! ! . 76 ! Qals 74 . ! . part of the state. Outcropping geologic materials in the quadrangle include TRASH FILL—Trash mixed and covered with clay, silt, sand, and minor 2005). Penetrated in wells 176 and 207, but base of Manasquan cannot be visible on 1:12,000 stereo airphotos and LiDAR imagery, dashed where Foster Run Tb Tb 49 ! ! ! Qtu 77 aft ! gravel. As much as 50 feet thick. Qtu Tchs 8 ! 6 . 72 Qtl surficial deposits of late Miocene to Holocene age that overlie the Cohansey Fossil leaves and seed pods were collected from iron-cemented sand near positively identified from the logs for these wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Themes and Resources Within the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail : Southern
    [29.74:N42j Historic Themes and Resou... NOV 2'o I1K1 ORIC THEMES AND RESOURC £LEMSOfc Clemson Universit within the 3 1604 019 773 722 NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAI SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY and the DELAWARE BAY: Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem Counties U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record P.O. Box 37127 Washington, DC 20013-7127 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/historicthemesreOOsebo HISTORIC THEMES AND RESOURCES within the NEW JERSEY COASTAL HERITAGE TRAIL SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY and the DELAWARE BAY: Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem Counties by KIMBERLY R. SEBOLD and SARA AMY LEACH U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record P.O. Box 37127 Washington, DC 20013-7127 Cover photograph: View of Cedar Creek dock. Rutgers Collection, no date. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sebold, Kimberly R., 1966- Historic themes and resources within the New Jersey coastal heritage trail : southern New Jersey and the Delaware Bay : Cape May, Cumberland, and Salem counties / by Kimberly Sebold and Sara Amy Leach, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. 1. Historic buildings-New Jersey-New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail. 2. Historic buildings-New Jersey-Cape May County. 3. Historic buildings-New Jersey- Cumberland County. 4. Historic buildings-New Jersey-Salem County. 5. Cape May County (N.J.) -History, Local. 6. Cumberland County (N.J.) -History, Local. 7. Salem County (N.J.) -History, Local. I. Leach, Sara Amy.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment to the Master Plan
    Hopewell Township Environmental Resource Inventory (ERI) Page 8 4.0 GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS 4.1 Geologic Province Hopewell Township is located at 39 441’ N, 75 258’W in the New Jersey Coastal Plain which is part of the larger Atlantic Coastal Plain physiogeographic province. The Atlantic Coastal Plain stretches along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts from Long Island to Mexico and contains one of the most prolific systems of aquifers in the country.1 In New Jersey, the Coastal Plain covers about 4,200 square miles from the Fall Line, Fall Line, the dividing line separating hard Paleozoic metamorphic rocks of the Appalachian Piedmont to the west from the softer, gently dipping Mesozoic and Tertiary sedimentary rocks of the Coastal Plain, to the Atlantic Ocean2. Most of the land is less than 50’ above sea level. The Coastal Plain is surrounded by brackish or salt water and is bound by the Delaware River to the west, Delaware Bay to the south and the Atlantic Ocean to the east. The Coastal Plain surface is divided into drainage basins which contribute runoff to a specific stream and its tributaries. Hopewell lies in the Cohansey River Drainage Basin. 4.2 Geologic Framework The following physiographic and hydro-geologic descriptions are excerpted from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Report on the New Jersey Coastal Plain Area (Vowinkel and Foster, 1981). The New Jersey Coastal Plain is underlain by a wedge shaped mass of unconsolidated sediments composed of clay, silt, sand and gravel. The wedge thins to a featheredge along the Fall Line and attains a thickness of over six-thousand feet (6,000') at the tip of Cape May County, New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface This CD-ROM Summarizes 13 Documents That Establish A
    Planning for the Future: A Summary of Cumberland County Planning Initiatives October 2002 Prepared for the: Cumberland County Department of Planning and Development Prepared by: Orth-Rodgers & Associates, Inc. 80 Cottontail Lane Somerset, NJ 08873 (732) 564-1932 Preface This presentation summarizes 13 documents that establish a strategic plan for Cumberland County. This summary was created in the spring of 2002, as part of a Smart Growth study with the primary goal of promoting economic development in the 11 municipalities comprising the Cumberland Development Corporation (that part of the County lying outside the urban centers). Cumberland County and the City of Bridgeton are partners in this Smart Growth study. When the Cumberland Development Corporation applied for the Smart Growth grant from the State of New Jersey, it was recognized that such a study would not be the first to examine planning issues from a regional perspective. Cumberland County has been involved in numerous studies that offer ideas on how best to care for the land, improve the transportation system, attract jobs for Cumberland County residents, and other important policies that together are intended to protect the quality of life in the County. To improve the accessibility of these planning documents to the public, they have for the first time been gathered and summarized in one place. Ten of the documents were prepared by, or with the active involvement of, the Cumberland County Department of Planning and Development. They have been grouped into the following three
    [Show full text]
  • Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use
    Journal of Extension Volume 54 Number 3 Article 14 6-1-2016 Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use Salvatore S. Mangiafico Rutgers University, [email protected] Kim Bell Cumberland County Department of Health, [email protected] Noah Hetzell Cumberland County Department of Health, [email protected] Recommended Citation Mangiafico, S. S., Bell, K., & Hetzell, N. (2016). Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use. Journal of Extension, 54(3), Article 14. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol54/iss3/14 This Research in Brief is brought to you for free and open access by TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Extension by an authorized editor of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. June 2016 Volume 54 Number 3 Article # 3RIB1 Research In Brief Fecal Coliform Concentrations in the Upper Cohansey River Watershed Predicted by Air Temperature, Discharge, and Land Use Abstract The Upper Cohansey River Watershed in southwestern New Jersey has a history of being affected by fecal coliform bacteria (FC). A study was undertaken to investigate the environmental factors associated with FC concentration. For 44% of samples taken throughout the watershed in 2012–2013, FC concentration exceeded the benchmark value. FC levels were related to air temperature, river discharge, and land use in stream buffers. Human sources of FC had been eliminated following research results published in 2009. Results of the study reported in this article suggest the need to further investigate wildlife sources of FC and to implement additional mitigation actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative American Shad Habitat Plan for the Delaware River
    The Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative American Shad Habitat Plan for the Delaware River Prepared by: The Nature Conservancy for the Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative Submitted to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission as a requirement of Amendment 3 to the Interstate Management Plan for Shad and River Herring American Shad Habitat Plan for the Delaware River Prepared by: The Nature Conservancy for the Delaware River Basin Fish & Wildlife Management Cooperative Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife • New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife • Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission • New York State Division of Fish, Wildlife and Marine Resources • U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service • National Marine Fisheries Service For: The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Shad and River Herring Management Board January 7, 2021 Approved May 5, 2021 Members of the Delaware River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative wish to express our deepest gratitude to Mari-Beth DeLucia and Lyndon DeSalvo of The Nature Conservancy. Simply stated, their exemplary contributions to the management of American Shad will form the foundation for the restoration of American Shad to the Delaware River Basin. Thank you. Introduction The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s (ASMFC) Amendment 3 to the American Shad and River Herring Fishery Management Plan (FMP) requires all states to submit a Habitat Plan for American Shad stocks in their jurisdiction. This report contains specific information for the Delaware River and its tributaries as it relates to habitat for American Shad in New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware and provides an update to the 2014 American Shad Habitat Plan (Plan) for the Delaware River Watershed.
    [Show full text]