I Am Writing and Attaching 2 Letters of Concern Regarding the Application to Develop Fairview Island and Our Strong Opposition R

From; Ferris Grar.t To: Kirtin Mpnyefl Cc: Subject: FaiMew Island Date: Ju,e-O6-17 12:32:21 Pl Attachments: Farviewlsland.docx Moii.docx

I am writing and attaching 2 letters of concern regarding the application to develop Fairview Island and our strong opposition regarding re-zoning the Island commercial.

Please see attached 2 letter regarding this issue.

I appreciate your attention to this matter. Ferris Grant I

Page 146 of 268 Ferris and Aaron Grant

June 52017

Dear Kirstin Maxwell

Please bring this letter to the attention of the Lake of Bays Township, Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation (LBHF), Lake of Bays Association (LOBA)and the Town of Huntsville.

I would like to formally express my objection to rezoning Faliview Island from Residential to Commercial. A commercial designation willset a dangerous precedent for this part of the lake that has been a quiet and peaceful part of Lake of Bays. This designation of commercial and the plans to put a large and very active corporate retreat on this Island poses numerous issues. This would be environmentally unsound with plans for elaborate hydro resulting in light pollution and a huge septic bed; all this on an Island that previously has had outhouses and solar panels, this would be a huge step back in our collective efforts to be more environmentally sound.

Myfamily owns the property that has a legal right of way connected to Fairview

Island and I would like to ask those of you who can make decision that will profoundly impact myself and my family to ensure that there is transparency and clarity regarding this development. The words of the developers (the Konrad family) and what is written in their building proposal are not consistent with claims of garbage storage and by-law altering numbers of parking spots (50) on Nithgrove Road. While the applicants claim they do not need any changes to the Nithgrove

Road property it is however mentioned extensively in their planning proposal. I propose that any mention of Nithgrove Road and proposed changes need to be removed from the planning report until such a time as these changes can be reviewed by the LOB township and evaluated by the appropriate district representatives. Huntsville should not be making decisions for land that is in Lake of Bays Township.

Page 147 ci 268 Huntsville or it’s residents in any appreciable financial way. In fact approving this would demonstrate a clear choice to favour these developers over a very concerned and upset group of constituents. A commercial designation would make sense potentially ifthis proposal would benefit the whole community however as described by the developers themselves the only impact on us willbe negative.

Ifyou are not ready to reject this proposal to rezone the Island outright (which would be preferable) Iwould ask that you at least delay approval until all relevant stakeholders are given a chance to weigh-in (specifically LOB township).

Thank you for your consideration on this mailer.

Yours truly, Ferris Grant Aaron Grant Otis Grant Alton Grant

Page 148 of 268 ______

Monday, June 5,2017

Dear whom it may concern,

I am writing to voice my concerns regarding the proposed “development” of Fairview Island.

I have been a permanent resident on my 200 acre property on for the past 40 years. In that time sadly I’ve witnessed the decline of many species of wildlife frequenting my property. I hope to provide a sanctuary for the wildlife that still lives in Muskoka by leaving to my children land that will NOT be “developed’ in any way. They will inherit stewardship of the land.

The small lakeshore access at the foot of is stipulated in the deed to my property as “a right of way in perpetuity”. This right of way used to be a small foot path affording my family access to swim and launch our canoe. It was an undisturbed piece of natural shoreline that has now been “developed” into a parking pad. I’m hearing horror stories regarding the possibilities of garbage storage on that tiny strip of land.

People love Muskoka not for the asphalt roads and multi storey buildings, but the natural flora and fauna and pristine wilderness. Let us strive to protect what is the best of Muskoka.

Sincerely,

Sharron Grant —

Page 149 of 268 From: FintanRobb Sent: June-06-173:39 PM To: KirstinMaxwell;Scott Aitchison Cc:

Subject: FairviewIslandZoningand DevelopmentProposalConcerns Attachments: FairviewIslandRezoningLetterto HuntsvillePlannerand MayorJune 6 2017.pdf

June 5,2017

Kirstinand Scott

I am a collage resident on Lake of Bays on the south shore off and I am writingto voice my concerns over the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island.

I share cottage ownership, , with my mother and sister. It has been part of the family since

1984. I have enjoyed Lake of Bays every Spring, Summer and early Fall for the past 33 years and continue to appreciate the unique residential and secluded atmosphere of the lake throughout these seasons as well as spending extended periods enjoying my family’sannual vacations on Lake of Bays. The cottage faces

Fairview Island so Iwas interested to learn about the planned proposal in April.

It was immediately concerning to leam that Fairview Island was under conditional sale based on a rezoning to a commercial classification and its establishment as an institutional tourist establishment. After learning more about the rezoning proposal I understand itwillprovide the new owners the opportunity to create a rental enterprise on FaiMew Island resulting in many concerns for Lake of Bays area including environmental concerns, issues of scale for this development and the opening of a door to never ending rezoning requests for commercial enterprises from future developers.

From an environmental perspective itseems that no thought was given to how the increased visitors, boat traffic, building development and maintenance (sewage etc.) of the build and ongoing intensified use of Fairview island willaffect the lake and its existing residents, animal and human. No publicly available environmental assessment was available at the time this letter was written. This is troubling as problems stemming from mismanagement on this front could put added pressure on local wildlife,the water environment and greatly diminish the lake’s attractiveness for prospective visitors and the existing residents of the lake and the township in general.

The scale of the desired development seems to be inconsistent in their proposal versus the talk of a “family feel” in the recent Town Hall meetings hosted by the Konrads. Much of the emphasis of the planning report is leveraging the OfficialPlans of Huntsville and Muskoka and the desire to drive “new Tourist Commercial uses” (page 8 Marie Poirier Planning Report). The desire to rezone to Institutional Camp (CS3) is much more of an aggressive rezoning than is required from what I understood the land would be used for, essentially a family compound with a main lodge and occasional corporate guests, as per the meeting the Konrads held on June 3rd. The proposal outlines increased residences on the island and various means of supporting travelers to the area; float plane docks, the potential for a helipad and the need for many additional parking spaces on Lake of

Page 150 of 268 Bays mainland shores for island access. The existing character of Lake of Bays willbe under threat with the potential to reflect negatively on the Huntsville area and the tranquilityit is known for.

The commercial rezoning would open up the potential for much greater development on Fairview Island in the future, far beyond this initial institutional camp proposal. It could also set the table for many other development groups to use this rezoning as a precedent to aggressively seek rezoning around Lake of Bays and other regional lakes, further disturbing the natural character of the region and creating additional pressures on the environment.

Ifthis group is earnest in their desire for family dwellings it seems a commercial rezoning is not required and the existing residential classifleation willsuffice for their needs. Iwould welcome the Konrads as residential landowners but Ithink their proposal for commercial rezoning is strictlyfor their short term business needs, unnecessary ifthey are true to their word of wanting to establish a family presence on the lake, and potentially harmful for the Lake of Bays environment and overall character. A commercial zoning would create troubling development intensification on Lake of Bays, added stress on the environment and the erosion of the established character of the lake and region so this application should be denied.

Regards,

Fintan Robb

2 Page 151 oF268 From: Gary Chapman Sent: June-05-17 5:11 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: Subject: FairviewIsland must not be rezoned Commercial

Dear Kirstin,

Iam sending this email to give myfamily’spoint of view on the request for a zoningchange for FairviewIsland. My name is Gary Chapman and my cottage is in the Township of Huntsville. This has been our cottage since the summer of 2004.

In Summary, we absolutely wish for Fairview Island to stay zoned Residential. We doS want it to become commercial.

Here is why:

Fairview Island is at the cross roads of the two main channels of Lake of Bays, and also creates a natural boundary for the lovely Whitehouse Bay. This is a residential area lake neighbourhood. A commercial use would be in compatible with the current character of the area and would impact a large portion of residential Lakeof Bays.Islandzoningcan have a far more dramatic impact on the lake and on far more portions of the lake.

Commercial uses have different hours of operation and different demands on the lake density which would impact our enjoyment of the lake. (more on this further on in the email).

The individuals that would participate in the many corporate retreats would not have the same interests and respect for the lake and it neighbours as residents that have a vested interest, and would be incompatible with the neighbourhood peacefulness that existstoday.

More specifically: Use as a corporate retreat wherein 30 to 40 people for each event, with no connection or vested interest in the ongoing enjoyment of the lake, will bring issues of:

1) Boat traffic to and from Fairview island as well as helicopter traffic, (they are asking for a helicopter pad) to get retreat participants to and from the island.

2)The noise and boat trafficfrom lake activitiessuch as water skiingand seadoos. Ifeven a small handful of people go waterskiing and each person goes around the island4 times or around Whitehouse bay, they could be J breakingthe peace and quiet all day, and creating waves that affect the shorelines on allthe mainland that surrounds the island.

3)The noise from retreat participants playingmusic on the docks. There isa request inthe zoningfor 6 or seven docks of 49 feet, plus a dock of mammoth square footage. Whereas owners of individualcottages are respectful of their neighbours, weekend warriors are less liketo be so. Musicand chatter carry easilyover the water to the shores facing the island.

4) The environmental impact on the water quality of a surge of demand on the septic systems and with boat gasoline when a retreat is being held.

1 Page 152 of 268 I Page 153 at 268 From: GiVesHickey < Sent June-04-17 10:54 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview Island Rezoning

Ms. Maxwell &the Town of Huntsville —

Iwould like to formally state my opposition to the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island.

I have resided on for my entire life. My connection to Huntsville and Lake of Bays is an extremely important part of my life and my personal identity. Our home is one of the closest properties to the development area, and Fairview dominates our view.

I believe that the proposed plan threatens our community on multiple levels:

I have never considered selling our property and leaving the community until reviewing this plan — this is a terrifying prospect, which concerns me deeply.

Upon much consideration, I ask that you decline this proposal for rezoning. Please include this correspondence as part of the information package that is forwarded to Town Council for the June 14th Planning Meeting. Please feel free to contact me should you have any need.

With respect,

Gilles Hickey

1 Page 154 of 268 From: Jamie Frank Sent: June-05-17 5:18PM To: KirstinMaxwell;Tanya Calleja Cc:

Subject: FairviewIsland Re-ZoningApplicationObjection

Dear Ms. Maxwell,

My family is writing to you to express our compiete opposition to the proposed re-zoning of Fairview Island. Please circulate the letter below to Council Members and the Mayor.

Thank you,

Shelley, Celeste, Harrison &Jamie Frank

To: Kirsten Maxwell, Tanya Calleja, Members of Council &the Mayor,

My family is writing to you to register our objection to the proposed re-zoning I redevelopment of Fairview Island.

The Frank family are long time residence of and have for three generations enjoyed and cherished the peaceful tranquility of Lake of Bays. The nature of the lake derives from the respectful, engaged residential community that lives on its shores and near shores.

Fairview Island is unsuitable for such a commercial venture of this magnitude and would bring immeasurable harm to this residential part of Lake of Bays. The Planning Justification Report prepared for you on behalf of George Konrad by Marie Poirier and Mr. Konrad’s comments at a public meeting on June 3 provide examples of why this is so:

• The dock facilities are to be satisfactory for seaplane use by guests. Noise pollution and increased potential for aircraft watercraft interaction are of great concern; • There is a proposed helipad. These aircraft are a tremendous source of both noise and air pollution. • Increased transient residence with no engagement to the greater community. The Konrad Group Inc. (of which Mr. Konrad is a partner) has over 200 employees and a worldwide list of clients. Renting and loaning of the property to these people is planned. In addition to a divested community, there are other concerns: o Can area marinas support parking and docking? There is poor demonstration of marina capacity & support shown; o An influxof non-licensed boaters if boat rentals becomes a solution to commuting to and from the island (marinas can rent to a non-licensed driver). This poses serious water safety issues (day & night); o The island being “company owned” creates a barrier to communicate community concems versus a single or family ownership. There is no identifiable “go to person”. o The volume of traffic triggers environmental and safety concems including the LOB Sailing Club programs.

Page 155 of 268 • Proposed is the renting of the island for corporate seminars I retreats with up to 40 people (although Mr. Konrad acknowledged that under the current proposal there is bed capacity for approximately 70

people). Again, I point to the last four (4) bulleted concerns. • There is a lack of specific detail regarding such things as: o Environmental assessment - location and routes for garbage disposal; the viabilityof safely disposing of the effluent related to forty guests; light pollution from cabins, walkways &multi- use buildings; &eight new docks with a total area of 586m2. o Can local resources accommodate a commercial project of this scale (police, fire, EMS, area hospitals, waste disposal, etc.)? o Traffic implications and water access usage for Nithgrove Road need to be clearly described. o Overall development of the property such as 1 or 2 story ‘cabins” and multiple phases of development were mentioned but without specifics of what that meant (could our peaceful lake be looking at a decade or more or contractor noise and traffic?). o The movement of building materials and the location of mainland staging area(s).

These are some of the reasons that make the Fairview Island development a serious intrusion on a well established residential community. A community that is very much a part of the Greater Huntsville Area.

The lack of specific detail in the Planning Report gives my familyadditional concern about the direction and intent of the future use of the property.

Rezoning Fairview Island as commercial property would be a serious error. We implore you not to do so.

Sincerely,

Jamie &Shelley Frank

2 Page 156 of 268 From: Jane Hogarth Sent: June-08-27 1:57 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell;

Cc Subject: FairviewIsland Rezoning Application

To Whom it May Concern,

I am writing on behalf of my family with regards to the application to rezone Fairview Island as it pertains to the oiler to purchase the island.

Our family has been on Lake of Bays for more than 50 years now. My parents, who are now in their SO’s,still enjoy the cottage, as do my two brothers and I, along with spouses and our collective 8 children. We are into the third generation, and our cottage on Lake of Bays holds a very special place in all of our hearts, being a place that we conic together as a family and to enjoy family and friends in such a beautithi setting.

We are all concerned about the application to rezone Fairview Island, and the impact it will have both on the lake and the community. We have been given access to the report by Bob Lehman, which seems very thorough, and brings up many legitimate points as to why this application to rezone should be turned down.

We are in agreement with all of the issues he identifies. Based on those issues, we believe that this application is not acceptable under the bylaws and laws applicable to the Township of Huntsville and District ofMuskoka, and therefore that there are no grounds for its approval.

The camp on Fairview was not the original historic use of the island, and in fact it appears to have been located there without proper approvals. Moreover, the camp has not been in operation for more than 50 years, and the island’s use has been strictly residential since the current owners purchased the property in 1972.

The designation of a camp such as the one located on Fairview Island is as an Institutional Tourist Establishment, not a Tourist Establishment, as is requested in the potential purchasers proposal. This difference has massive connotations to usage of the property.

There are significant environmental concerns regarding waste and sewage, as well as impacts on water quality. There are also concerns regarding the shoreline and the natural environment on the island.

In addition, there are significant and unacceptable traffic, parking, noise, access and density issues that would arise as a result of this proposal.

The proposal does not conform with the District ofMuskoka Official Plan.

On a more personal level, we have concerns about noise, increased activity and the overall impact this development would have on the lake and all of the residents, cottagers and visitors who enjoy its serenity. The intensity of the proposed use will severely detract from the qualities that make Lake of Bays such a special

Page 157 of 268 place.

We are also concerned that should this application be approved, it could open the door to potential future impacts that go considerably beyond what the proponents intend today. Should they sell the island in the future, if commercial designation has been given to the current purchasers, the new purchasers will be in a position to develop the property in a way that is even more out of step with the lake as it exists today.

We hope you will consider our concerns in the process of reviewing the Application to rezone Faiiwicw Island.

Please note that I am also sending this to the Mayor of Huntsville and Dan Armour, the Bmnel Ward Couneillor,

Respectfully,

Jane 1-logarth

2 Page 158 of 268 From: John Peterson Sent: June-05-1712:26PM To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: Pleasedo not approvezoningchangefor FairviewIsland

Dear Kristin Maxwell, Please forward my letter to the Mayor Aitchison and councillors of Huntsville as objection to the consideration for changing the zoning of Fairview Island. Sincerely, John Peterson

Dear Mayor Aitchison and councillors of Huntsville,

My wife and I are property owners in Lake of Bays for 18 years and have visited friends on Lake of Bays for more than a decade before buying our property. I’mwriting to you to express my family’s deep concern over the proposed rezoning of Faitwicw Island to CS3 to allow for the development of an Institutional Camp. My wife and I sat through through a two hour meeting on Saturday morning where the future owners of Fairview Island discussed their proposal for development of the island. We came away even more disturbed by what we heard from the Konrad family than we have been during the last few weeks alter hearing of the development proposal. If the zoning change is approved allowing the sale of the island to be completed and the project to move ahead it will undoubtedly change the residential nature of our part of Lake of Bays. This is not a small project. Proposed are buildings that would have 26 bedrooms, 29 bathrooms, central kitchen and dining facilities, helicopter landing pad and docks that would accommodate float planes. We also believe that, after hearing from the Konrad family, should this project be approved it will lead to other ftiwre requests for even more facilities to be added. We have great concern over the effect that this development will have on the environment with significant increases in noise. light and water pollution not to mention the loss of acres of forest on the island. We see that Huntsville has a very small footprint in the Lake Of Bays and possibly there are many important items on your agenda but we believe that this one issue could create the longer term potential to change the character of development on Lake of Bays and the Town of Huntsville. The residents of Lake of Bays are very upset at the thought of this zoning change being approved and my feeling from eniails received over the last few weeks and discussions with residents at the meeting in Huntsville this past Saturday is that there is significant motivation to take all actions available to us to ensure that this zoning change does not happen. There are two lots on Nithgrove road that are part of the sale and in the planning proposal are used as fulfilling the requirement for mainland access and parking. This in effect turns the lots on Nithgrove into a commercial parking lot and public dock. We find this very hard to accept. Nithgrove is a quiet lakeside residential community with a long history. The residents here are very upset and with good reason. Sincerely, John Peterson

1 Page 169 of 266 From: Kathryn Cronin Sent: June-03-17 12:29 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fw:Opposing rezoning of Fairview Island

Trying again.

-— Forwarded Message From: Kathryn Cronini

5ent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 12:2 vM Subject: Opposing rezoning of Fairview Island

Dear Sir/Madam,

Our family are longtime residents of and we object to the proposed re-zoning / redevelopment of Fairview Island, and would like to register our opposition at this time.

We are greatly concerned about the negative environmental impact such a development would have on the lake, including increased parking and car/truck/boat traffic in and around Nithgrove Rd (and other parts of the lake), as well as the negative impact that the supply-side services of such a development would have: increased noise, pollution, light, loss of tree canopy, docks, septic, etc. We are not alone in our concerns and ask that you oppose the re-zoning application.

Please confirm you have received this note.

Respectfully yours, Dr Donald B Montgomery Tom & Kathryn Cronin (nee Montgomery)

1 Page 160 of 268 From: KaarinaGentle < > Sent: June-05-17 6:21PM To: Tanya Calleja;KirstinMaxwell Cc:

Subject: FairviewIslandZoning and Development Proposal

Dear Kirstinand Tanya, As cottagers on for more than thirtyyearn, we wish to make itknownthat we have some veryserious concems about the applicationfor commercialzoning of FairviewIsland.We are very opposed to this happening as, regardless ofwhat the applicants state as theirvisionfor the use ofthe island, the realityinthe future may end up being quite different,once it has been zoned as commercial.We are on a very busy part of Lake of Says withthe Glenmount publicdock, the Lake of Bays Sailing Club,and the tennis courts so inthe summer season, there is a great deal of car and boat trafficinthe area witha lotof young people as wellas small children.We also have people being picked up by boats from BigwinIsland and occasionally have cars parked overnight.

IfFairviewIsland is zoned commercial, there willbe more people using FaiMew Island and people willalways lookfor the shortest distance between points and therefore NithGrove and GlenmountRd. willbecome very desirable departure points, regardless of the requests or suggestions ofthe owners of FairviewIslandfor alternative parking.We findithard to understand how an Islandcan be zoned commercialwhen there is minimalspace on the mainland for legal parkingfor that Island and when automobiles followedby boats would be the primarymeans of transportation to get to and from that Island. The other alternativewould be an Islandwhere most people arrive by air,whichwouldcreate a large issue with noise pollutionas wellas aircrafton the water.

In additionto allthis, there is our concern that zoningthis island commercialand havingitused for commercialpurposes willset a precedent that could lead to commercializationthat would lead to a significantlydifferentLake of Says where water, noise and lightpollutiondamage the eco-system that we are tryingso hard to preserve and restore.

Cliffand Kaahna Gentle

1 Page 161 of 268 From: Kate Doyle Sent June-07-17 8:47 AM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc Me Subject: Fairview Island - Rezoning to Commercial and Future Development - Access Point

Kristen Maxwell, Manager of Planning, Town of Huntsville

Hello Kristen,

We are following up on our previous e-mail correspondence of June 5,2017.

As discussed at the June 3d meeting and as contained within the various materials presented including the rezoning application - there is much confusion and conflicting information around the intended use of the Nithgrove property. Representations and material have varied from — use will be maintained consistent with current practice, to use will be restricted to the personal vehicles of the immediate family, to the property will be used for access for the residential and camp (ie commercial) component of the island.

We ask that all reference to using the Nithgrove Road property as access be removed from the application for the following reasons:

1. As noted, the application lacks clarity in its intention. And if say, the intention to restrict use to only the personal vehicles and access of the immediate family members — no indication of how that would be managed is referenced. 2. The Nithgrove property should in no way be used as an access point for a an active commercial property and operation — the property is located within a waterfront residential community and lacks size and scale to serve a commercial purpose in a safe and environmental sound manner. 3. Moreover — existing zoning and bylaw approvals for the Nithgrove lot do not permit access to a commercial property - which of course is the request of the Fairview Island rezoning. 4. Finally, the Nithgrove property is not located within the Town of Huntsville and hence the Town of Huntsville does not have jurisdiction to alter the existing zoning and use of the Nithgrove property.

We thank you for your assistance in this important matter and request.

Regards,

Katherine Sutherland Robert Doyle

1 Page 162 o(268 From: Kate Doyle Sent: June-05-17 10:02 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fw: Fairview Island - Rezoning to Commercial and Future Development

From: Kate Doyle Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 9:59 PM To: kirstinmaxwefl©huntsville.ca Cc: Subject: FaiMew Island - Rezoning to Commercial and Future Development

Kristen Maxwell, Manager of Planning, Town of Huntsville

Hello Kristen,

Thank you and very good of you to attend and participate in the information session on iune 3 regarding the captioned.

As background, we are members of the Lake of Bays Association and our family has been landowners and residents on Lake of Bays since 1941.

We want to advise that we are strongly opposed to the application in front of you for the following key reasons:

Despite the presentation by the applicants — it is very unclear what the intended long term use of the property is. While the verbal presentation empathized family compound and periodic sharing with extended family and employees — the specifics and breadth of the application is much broader with the potential for a significant of component of commercial activity / leasing to third party corporations. When pressed for detail on expected usage by category - the applicants are unable or unwilling to provide detail. We believe the development — even as outlined in the verbal presentation - will have significant impact to the existing environment and the enjoyment / lifestyle of residents. We see the following as key areas of concern — boat traffic and safety, noise, night light, water quality, waste management. Of course, as the usage of the property orients more towards employee use and leasing to third party companies negative impact on the environment and existing lifestyle will intensify. a Finally - we are concerned that approval of commercial zoning for this property will set important negative precedence for Lake of Bays generally — encouraging other landowners to seek similar zoning. As well — once commercially zoned — based on the discussion last week — we understand it will be much easier for the existing or future owners to amend and intensify commercial activities on the property.

1 Page 163 of 268 We have copied the Mayor and Municipal Clerk with this correspondence and do ask that you forward a copy onto all Town Councillors.

Sincerely appreciate your serious review and consideration of our concerns and position. We will be attending the meeting on June 14.

Kate Sutherland Robert Doyle

cc: Tanya Calleja, Municipal Clerk for the Town of Huntsville Scott Aitchison, Mayor of Huntsvillel

2 Page 164 af 268 I-

-Original Message- From: infoesolutionsgroup.ca [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sent: June-05-17 3:23 PM To: Tanya Calleja Subject: Fairview Island, Lake of Bays

We would like to formally state our opposition to the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island.

We have been on Lake of Bays for 17 years and have recently purchased a property at 58 Clovelly Road. My children went to school in Huntsville and my connection to Huntsville and Lake of Bays is an extremely important part of our family’s life.

I believe that the proposed plan threatens our community on many levels:

Negative impact to the natural beauty, aesthetics, etc. Introduces environmental risks (Water quality, natural ecology, regional wildlife) Negative impact to the community culture: Our relationships with our neighbors is a massive part of our enjoyment of Huntsville Corporate interests are fundamentally different than those of private residential owners Sets a precedent for commercialization of residential areas and environmentally unique geographies Introduces the risk of high-turnover “weekenders” — short term rentals, summer camps, etc. Introduces the risk of incremental commercialization and corporate development

This is a frightening prospect, which concerns our family deeply.

1 Page 165 of 268 Regards,

Laura & Ben Mair

This email was sent to you by Laura Mai through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

2 Page 166 of 268 From: Laura Mair Sent: June-05-17 3:19 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview Island, Lake of Bays

Ms. Maxwell & the Town of Huntsville —

We would like to formally state our opposition to the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island.

We have been on Lake of Bays for 17 years and have recently purchased a property at . Mychildren went to school in Huntsville and my connection to Huntsville and Lake of Rays is an extremely important part of our family’s life.

I believe that the proposed plan threatens our community on many levels:

I. Negative impact to the natural beauty, aesthetics, etc. 2. Introduces environmental risks (Water quality, natural ecology, regional wildlife) 3. Negative impact to the community culture: oOur relationships with our neighbors is a massive part of our enjoyment of Huntsville a Corporate interests are fundamentally different than those of private residential owners 4. Sets a precedent for commerciali2ation of residential areas and environmentally unique geographies 5. Introduces the risk of high-turnover “weekenders” — short term rentals, summer camps, etc. 6. Introduces the risk of incremental commercialization and corporate development

This is a frightening prospect, which concerns our family deeply.

part Upon much consideration, I ask that you decline this proposal for rezoning. Please include this correspondence as of the information package that is forwarded to Town Council for the June 14th Planning Meeting. Please feel free to contact me should you have any need.

Regards,

Laura &Ben Mair

1 Page 167 of 268 Jasmine Last

From: LillyBarnes Sent: June-05-17 8:33 PM To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: Applicationfor re-zoning of FairviewIsland.

Greetings, Kirsten Maxwell,

I wish to express my opposition to the granting of the re-zoning of Fain’iew Island.

My reasons are as follows:

There are a great many issues as yet unresolved and so the application for re-zoning is premawre. No assessment has been made of the environmental impact from 29 toilets, the number of docks, the helicopter and float planes (yes they are in the plan), the traffic on the lake from supply-boats, removal-of-waste boats, ferrying people, and the impact from sounds and lights on the environment, including the humans in it.

No firm arrangements have been made at any mainland marina or potential points of arrival and departure for the many boats and parked cars which will need mainland access and which should surely be required as part of the application. Most of the potential mainland access points and parking facilities would be in Lake of Bays Townships.

Our property is adjacent to the strip of land owned by the Langford family and attached to the Fairview Property. We and it are under the jurisdiction of the Township of Lake of Bays. Without clear arrangements made and proven to have been made with other sources for parking and boat traffic, we may find ourselves overrun by a steady commercial stream of boats, people, and parking. Yes, we know there is a limit on cars and boats using that strip of land and the dock at this time - we also know how quickly a by-law change was granted when need arose for Faiiwiew Lslandowners.

- Altogether, there are too many unresolved issues to hastily push through a re-zoning and too many of the issues make their impact on Lake of Bays Townships’ residents for these townships and their constituents not to be consulted.

Please include this e-mail letter as part of the information package that is forwarded to Town Council in preparation for the June 14th Planning Meeting.

Sincerely, Lilly Barnes

1 Page 168 of 268 From: Cathy Cronln To: KirstinMaveII Subject: FaiMew Island proposed development Date: May-29-178:01:01 PM

Good Day. My name is Cathy Cronin, President of the Lake of Bays Tennis Club at

(Glenmount Dock is at the foot of our road). I am writing as the development on Fair-viewIsland has the potential to impact Gienmount Dock, Glenmount Road and thus, our club and the community at large.

Let me provide a little background to give you context. The Lake of Bays Tennis Club has existed for 40+ years and has over 120 membership families, all with property on Lake of Bays. We are an inexpensive, volunteer run club that offers kids programs, adult events and member access to courts from May to October. We have our own private road/driveway and parking lot that keeps cars out of sight and off Glenmount Road. The tennis club is a contributor to the spirit of community on Lake of Bays.

Our concern with the Fairview development is the use of Glenmount Dock as a staging or ferrying location for the ucorporate retreat” events. We understand that Glenmount Dock is in the township of Lake of Bays and Fairview Island is in the township of Hunstville. We are asking you to consider the impacts on all sides of the island.

We are concerned about our driveway/road and added traffic. Our concerns specifically are:

1. Greater traffic, commotion around the dock where kids and boats are a constant in the summer. A significant safety issue.

2. Buses or vehicles that will park or drop off at Glenmount Dock; blocking or congesting our driveway

3. Vehicles that will use our driveway/road as a turn-around method, causing damage and increasing vehicle to vehicle interaction

4. Vehicles that may park illegally in our lot

Beyond our concerns for the club, we are concerned for the Lake of Bays community - the impact the rezoning would cause on increased noise levels, boat traffic, boat safety, shoreline impacts and environmental impacts that cascaded from significant development.

We would like to request that the application as Private Institutional Camp be turned down.

Yours sincerely,

The Lake of Bays Tennis Club Board

Page 169 of 268 From: M Scully Sent: June-05-17 4:15 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: FW: Fairview Island Residential Zoning

Kirstin Maxwell Town of Huntsville Planning Department 37 Main Street East Huntsville, Ontario P1H 1A1

Kirstin:

I am writing to object to the current development plan being proposed for Fairview Island as a resident of in the Town of Huntsville (address ).

Overall my objection relates to the fact that the developer is requesting a change in zoning from residential to commercial.

We live in a residential lake neighbourhood. Commercial zoning for corporate retreats would increase density, traffic (cars, boats and planes) and expand busy hours of activity altogether. Commercial zoning is intrusive in a residential neighbourhood. The two zoning uses are incompatible and therefore I helieve this precedent of commercial zoning in the middle of a residential neighbourhood should not be supported.

Compounding the issue of traffic and density concerns is the fact that we are considering an island located in a bay for development. An island commercial use will mean even more traffic than would normally be associated with a mainland commercial property. Everyone and every thing has to come in by boat or plane which would have a significant impact on the neighbours in the bay. Therefore the development of an island for commercial purposes needs to be considered differently than a mainland property.

My understanding is that the historic use of the site since 1966 has been for residential purposes. The result of this application would be a significant change in terms of intensity of use from the current residential use for all the reasons discussed above.

How the developer has outlined he would like use the property as a family compound, understand, could he accomplished under the residential zoning so changing the designation of residential zoning for Fairview Island shouldn’t be necessary. We hope the Town of Huntsville will keep Fairview Island’s residential zoning designation.

Thank you for your consideration.

Regards,

1 Page 170 of 268 Mandy Scully

2 Page 171 of 268 From: Margaret Casey Sent: June-06-17 2:43 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc:

I Subject: Fairview Island Development Application = Concerns from Margaret and John Casey

Kirsten:

My husband and I have not had the opportunity to provide you with a summary of our concerns about the OPA and Re- Zoning Applications for Fairview Island that is found in the Town of Huntsville section of Lake of Bays since we were out of the country for most of the time since we first learned of this proposal. However this email lists our concerns in order of priority.

1. The commercial zoning that seems to be required. I agree that a residential zoning is much preferred for all the reasons expressed at the June 3, 2017 meeting held at the Active Living Centre. 2. The scale of the development: namely the number and size of structures and docks: a. The cumulative size of the service building, central accommodation and facilities building and accessory building as well as the supporting staging area and pathways” (which would be more appropriately identified as roads) are sufficiently large that a schedule for the timing of the phases of development needs to be identified to understand the cumulative impact of the entire project. b. This scale of development willlikely require greater treatment of water and sewage than is implied by the simplicity of the planning document prepared by their planner. c. Continuance of the Managed Forest Plan: The suggestion in the planner’s report that the Managed Forest Plan can continue to meet its environmental objectives appears very unlikely, given the scale of development and vegetation disturbance described in the engineering report by Dan Duke. This report appears to be quite preliminary given the scope of a development proposal that is seeking a commercial zoning designation. 3. The water access plan proposed is entirely inadequate as all but one option (the Huntsville public access on South Portage Rd which does not permit overnight parking) are located in the Township of Lake of Bays. Despite the fact that the application may comply to the Huntsville OP (as stated by the proponent’s planner), the Huntsville Planning Department should be encouraged to ensure the proponent consults with the LOB Council as that municipality will be responsible to enforce the access plan and resolve any problems that arise. The LOB Council would also be better able to assess the validity of the letters provided by marinas who provide letters to meet the number of parking spots as determined by the Huntsville planner. LOB would have site plans for the marinas that could confirm that the parking commitments will not create more parking problems than currently exist.

Despite a resolution of my first concern, the commercial zoning, to a residential zoning designation, the other two concerns will not likely be resolved by the level of detail offered in the application reports.

Further discussions with the proponents and the Lake of Bays community are necessary in our opinion.

)t4otrØaret aMdiJChvV Ccey

I Page 172 of 268 From: Mike Miller Sent: June-06-17 8:51 AM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: Subject: Application to Rezone Fairview Island - Lake of Bays - June 14th Meeting

Dear Kristin, Thank you for managing all these emails regarding the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island to commercial use. Please include this email as part of the information package to be sent to the Planning Committee.

My concern regarding the rezoning of Fairview Island is summarized below

It is shameful, that in this day and age of concern about the environment and responsible stewardship of the Lake of Bays community, a major Lake of Bays island will be converted from low-risk residential to high-risk commercial use.

From a reading of the limited information regarding the redevelopment of Fairview, we are concernedl It seems to us that the redevelopment to commercial use from residential use, in the middle of Lake of Bays, is totally at odds with the values of the District of Lake of Bays, Township of Huntsville and certainly the Lake of Bays Association. In addition, there are many questions and risks associated with a commercial rezoning:

* how many individuals will this corporate retreat accommodate * how are guests shuttled to and from the island, where is parking * where do food, beverage and laundry suppliers load/unload ... likely Glenmount Dock * how does all this affect the Sailing Club, Tennis Club, Nithgrove cottagers, etc * who may rent the Fairview facility, what kind of activities will take place * who manages the property and ensures the safety of guests and potential renters * what happens after the prospective owners decide to resell the island * how will all this affect boat traffic and noise, safety of other boaters * the prospective owners can achieve their goals with residential zoning

Given these material uncertainties and risks, we firmly believe that Fairview island must maintain its residential zoning.

Thank you for your consideration,

Susan Bowman, Randall and Mike Miller

cc Kirstin Maxwell

1 Page 173 of 268 From: caroline konarzewski Sent June-05-17 3:59 PM To: Tanya Calleja; Kirstin Maxwell Cc: Subject: Fairview Island Zoning and Development Proposal to: Tanya Calleja, Municipal Clerk for the Town oCI-Iuntsvillc Kirstin Maxwell, Manager of Planning for the Town of Hunsville

Please be advised that I Thilysupport the Fairview Island Zoning and Development Proposal.

Mike Konaivewski

1 Page 174 of 268 I-

-Original Message- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Sent: June-03-17 12:36 PM To: Tanya Calleja Subject: Opposing re-zoning of Fairview Island

Our family are longtime residents of and we object to the proposed re-zoning / redevelopment of Fairview Island, and would like to register our opposition at this time.

We are greatly concerned about the negative environmental impact such a development would have on the lake, including increased parking and car/truck/boat traffic in and around Nithgrove Rd (and other parts of the lake), as well as the negative impact of the supply-side services such a development would have: increased noise, pollution, light, loss of tree canopy, docks, septic, etc. We are not alone in our concerns and ask that you oppose the re-zoning application.

Please confirm you have received this note.

Donald Montgomery, Tom & Kathryn Cronin (nee Montgomery),

This email was sent to you by Donald Montgomery, Kathryn & Tom Cron http ://www. hun tsville.ca/.

1 Page 175 of 268 From: Nancy prittie Sent: June-06-17 12:35 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fwd: Fairview Island Rezoning opposition

Hi Kirstin,

We would also like to formally go on record to oppose the rezoning of Fairview Island.

We are seasonal tax paying residents of Huntsville located at We are also very concerned that the proposed rezoning would be disruptive to Lake of Bays and the quiet enjoyment of our cottage and the lake.

While our cottage is a around the corner from Clovelly point and can not see Fairview island, we support the concerns of those residents on Clovelly point who are most directly affected by this proposed change. We would be affected by the increase in noise and boat traffic and are concerned about the potential impact on the environment.

We would appreciate if you could ensure that this letter forms part of the public record and is included in any correspondence with the Planning Committee or Town Council in preparation for the June 14 Planning Meeting regarding the Rezoning application of Fairview Island.

Sincerely,

Billand Nancy PRIHIE

1 Page 176 of 268 Huntsville, ON

2 Page 177 of 268 _____

From: Peggy Clarke > Sent: June-04-17 8:28 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview Island proposed development Attachments: Huntsville re Fairview.docx

Kirstin, Please ensure that the attached letter is included with the material that goes to the Mayor and all Councillors in preparation for the re zoning application to be heard on June 14. Based on its content, I believe there is no option but to recommend that this application as currently written be denied.

Thank you very much.

Peggy Clarke

1 Page 178 of268

- 3 June 2017

Mr.Scott Aitchison, Mayor Town of Huntsville 37 Main St. E., Huntsville, Ontario, P1H 238

Dear Mr.Aitchison,

Re: Re-zoning proposal for Fairview Island

After attending the Konrad family’s information meeting we are deeply concerned about the inconsistency between their stated intent and the Planning Report prepared by Marie Poirier. Our concerns centre on the questionable need for zoning change, environmental protection, and mainland access. There are many other issues, but we will limit the discussion to these 3 that are inter-related.

Zoning The Konrads stated their 3 primary objectives are: • Family vacation spot • Fnvite their friends / employees • Occasional rental to clients / their employees

It appears that these objectives could be accomplished under existing residential zoning, possibly with a minor variance for the activities structure; no one at the information meeting was prepared to answer otherwise. The argument regarding reversion to original use as a camp appears unfounded, as it is our understanding that the first 2 owners of the property used it as a seasonal residence, and the diversion to camp use was unauthorized.

Notwithstanding the stated intentions of the Konrads, should the zoning be changed to any form of “Institutional”, it was the experienced view of constituents at the meeting that future changes toward other commercial uses would effectively be facilitated. It is one thing for a huyer to acquire a cottage property close to a commercial enterprise; it is quite another to have a commercial enterprise such as described in the Planning Report imposed on existing community members who object to the inevitable degradation of the environment This is contrary to their purpose for settling in that location, and is unacceptable.

The Planning Report states on page 7 “...it is the intention of the purchasers to partner with local attractions, events, and tourist facilities to enhance the experience of the guests to the island. The use of the island as a corporate retreat will engage the local food and beverage industry and local staff will be hired for supervision, maintenance and servicing.” When questioned today, the Konrads said they did not intend to hire staff. One version is simply not accurate.

Page 179 of 268 Environmental protection We were told that no environmental assessment has been conducted. The Planning Report states that 14 acres of the 20-acre island fall under a Managed Forest Plan, but there is no explanation as to how adequate septic treatment for 29 proposed bathrooms can be accommodated in the area available. In fact, the Duke Engineering Mitigation Report (Planning Report Appendix VII) notes that the design sewage flows exceed the maximum allowed by the Ontario Building Code.

On page 12 of the Planning Report there is extensive reference to commercial vehicles such as water taxis, caravan floatplanes and helicopter services. Today the Konrads stated that they do not intend to utilize any of these. This is an unacceptable inconsistency. Ifthe Planning Report is accurate, it implies major alteration to the environment - water, air — light and sound, vegetation.

Further, the waste management of a facility accommodating upwards of 40 people daily would logically require some kind of garbage receptacles on the mainland, for which the only point of connection is Nithgrove Road. A waste management facility, with its attendant issues and implications for attracting wildlife to an inhabited area, cannot be imposed on existing residents.

Mainland access (Township of Lake of Bays) The Konrads indicated that only their immediate family would park cars on the Nithgrove Road parking lot which is currently approved for 10 cars, plus 2 in the water access ramp area.

However, the Poirier Planning Report Appendix VI,Official Plan Amendment states: “8.19.2 (c) Mainland access to the Island for the residential and camp component of the use will be from a Waterfront Landing and related back lot located on Nithgrove Road...” If due process is to be respected, a re-zoning application in one jurisdiction cannot contain an Official Plan Amendment that affects another jurisdiction without its agreement We were told today that the Township of Lake of Bays has not received any notice in this regard. This is an additional and unacceptable inconsistency in the application.

Further, on page 4 of the Planning Report it is stated that access is available ... “from several commercially operating marinas on Lake of Bays and several public access points as well as locally-operating commercial plane the helicopter services Generally, points of public access to the water do not provide parking. Without documented evidence of agreements with local marinas for overnight guest parking, it appears that the only legal point of entry with parking is Nithgrove Road. This has very significant implications for the surroundings.

The Poirier Planning Report is extremely troubling to existing residents. It appears that full consideration has not been given to the massive impact on the island environment and on Nithgrove Road that the proposal would cause.

We request that the application to be heard on June 14 be denied; it has not been adequately researched and is fraught with inconsistencies. There are too many unexplained issues and unanswered questions for this to proceed.

Yours very truly,

Peggy Clarke / Ian MacGregor c.c. Ms. Kirsten Maxwell, Manager of Planning TOWn Huntsville Hage 1 u or 2b From: Peter Irwin Sent June-05-17 4:39 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject FaiMew Island rezoning

Kirstin,

I would like to formally go on record and oppose the rezoning of Fairview Island. I am a seasonal tax paying resident of Huntsville located at and very concerned that the proposed rezoning would be extremely disruptive to Lake of Bays and the quiet enjoyment of our residential properties. My residence along with several others on Clovelly Point are very close to the island where a zoning change would have a dramatic impact. The proposed rezoning does not conform to the Town’s Official Plan (nor that of the District) and will result in a significant increase in noise, boat traffic and environmental issues along with a decline in the natural beauty of the island. We purchased our property with the knowledge that the island was zoned residential not commercial and expect the Town to maintain that zoning.

I would appreciate your assistance in ensuring that this letter forms part of the public record and is included In any correspondence with the Planning Committee or Town Council. Iwill be attending the June 14 Planning Meeting and hereby request time on the agenda to make a deputation.

Sincerely, Peter Irwin

1 Page 181 of 268 From: Campbell Richard Sent: June-04-17 12:19 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell; Tanya Calleja; [email protected] Cc:

Subject: Application to Rezone Fairview Island Attachments: Fairview Island Rezoning.pdf; ATT00001.txt

Hello Mr. Mayor and Kirstin Maxwell

I writing to you to convey my concerns about the rezoning application made to change Fairview Island on Lake of Says from SR4 Shoreline Residential to CS3 institutional camp. I have included a letter I wrote to concerned neighbours on Lake of Bays detailing my position in the hope to urge you and other Town Councillors to turned down this application to rezone Fairview Island into a institutional resort establishment. Kirstin, please include the attached note as part of the information package that is forwarded to Town Council in preparation for the June 14th Planning Meeting. Thank you for your consideration. Richard Campbell

1 Page 182 of 268 To: Mayor Scott Aitchison Kirstin Maxwell, Manager of Town Planning, Town of Huntsville Township of Lake of Bays. LOBA LBHF

June 4,2017

My name is Richard Campbell. My family has been on for 113 years.

Currently my wife Tracy and I are permanent resIdents of which is the private road extension of . is directly opposite Fairview Island. Most of the cottages/ homes on directly face the south side of Fairview Island.

Our group is a growing number of concerned families from Glenmount/Wahawin Road, Clovelly Road, Crown Island, Roothog Island and Nithgrove Road. We are concerned cottagers for the above impacted areas and are equally concerned for the overall enjoyment of Lake of Bays by all cottagers.

We have hired a very experienced municipal and planning lawyer as well as a very highly regarded planner who has written numerous Official Plans for municipalities in Ontario. He has appeared over 500 times at the 0MB. Our interest is in separating fact from fiction to ensure we are getting the facts as it pertains to the actual implications of rezoning the Fairview Island from SR4 (shoreline residential) to CS3 (institutional camp also referred as institutional tourist establishment).

The problem I am having is that I believe there is a considerable disconnect between what was said at the informal meetings with the Applicant and what is proposed in their Planning Report prepared by Marie Poirier. We are only interested in the facts as pertains to this particular application and thus have hired very experienced and knowledgeable professionals to ensure the facts, implications and inconsistencies are properly disseminated. We believe there are a number of areas in the Proposal that are lacking details and specifics which are imperative to making an informed opinion. There needs to be much more detail on the building staging issues, ferrying issues, the use of the Nithgrove lots and the environmental impacts on our Lake. Neighbouring residents are concerned with noise issues, boat traffic and safety concerns and the negative night sky implications.

For example, the Proposal states that there will be 19 new structures (cabins, docks, maintenance buildings, outbuildings) built on the island, 6 of which are new private cabins. While a perimeter square foot figures are provided, there is no detail on the design of the building, the number of storeys or whether there is a kitchen. The more relevant figure, the square footage of each building is not provided.

Another example of the need to deal only with the facts is evidenced by an email that was sent out after this cottager went to the first information session. The email says “I

1 of 3 Page 183 of 268 know that there has been much speculation about the retreat’ that is being proposed”. The email then goes on to say “This is not being developed as a business, a hotel, an exclusive Airbnb or anything of the sort”. Its is very important to get the facts straight. If you refer to the second paragraph on page 4 of the Poirier Report it states “The commercial uses of the Island are intended to include a corporate retreat which includes facilities and privately rented accommodations units for corporate guests Page 3 paragraph 4 of the Poirier Report states “The proposal further includes rental of the Island facilities on an exclusive and highly selective basis for corporate retreats and private events”. Fairview Island can be rented out. This Proposal clearly has a business component to it. It is so important that we all get the facts straight.

I am only trying to convey the information as stated in the applicants Proposal, to ensure we all understand the scope of this development. As an example of information that was obtained from the first information session, one cottage participant’s email states “The building development is solely reconstruction of existing buildings with the addition of 1 larger building and interior island roads to connect the buildings on the property.” This is not factually correct. Ifyou refer to the Poirier Report Appendix 3, chart titled SP3, you willnotice a table in the top left corner of the diagram. It has three major columns on the left - Existing, Proposed and Proposed Resulting for all building structures, existing and proposed. You willnotice that all existing buildings on Fairview Island are to be removed except the existing 2 story, 2 slip boathouse and 2 existing docks. This means that of the 34 existing structures on the Island today, 31 are to be removed. This is clearly not a reconstruction but a demolition.

There are so many issues I questions that are unanswered including many concerns about the use of the Nithgrove lots. We have contacted Melissa Markham, Director of Planning, Lake of Bays Planning Department to see ifthere has been any applications to change the use of the two Nithgrove lots. To date, there has been no applications to change the usage of these lots. Isn’t it very important to know now what the long term Applicant’s intentions are for the use of the Nithgrove lots? How can we make an informed decision on the rezoning of Fairview Island without knowing what willhappen with the Nithgrove lots? Another example of insufficient information pertains to waste management. Was waste management details explained at the information session... no. In the Poirier Report Appendix VII, Duke Engineering letter page 4, it states “All waste should be stored in animal and smell proof containers. A private contractor may have to been retained to provide a waste bin on the mainland and the Island for disposal”. Where on the mainland? Is there going to be a large waste management disposal bin on the Nithgrove lot?

There has been much speculation of what would happen ifanother developer buys the

Island and leaves the zoning at 6R4 and develops it. I heard one person say there could be up to 15 cottages built and I have read others believe there could be 20 cottages built. In Canada, facts do matter. Ifthe Island zoning does not change but is fully developed and using the methodology used by the Town of Huntsville to determine density, the area / hectare calculation yields a maximum of 8 cottages which could be built. Using the shoreline perimeter calculation a maximum of 7 cottages could be built. The maximums of 7 or 8 are less than or equal to the 8 accommodation buildings that

2 of 3

Page 184 of 268

I are being proposed under this application. It is very important to note that under the current shoreline residential zoning the maximum lot coverage is 5%. Ifthe zoning is changed to institutional resort establishment as the Applicant is desiring, the lot cover ratio increases drastically to 30% (see Poirier Report, Appendix VII, Duke Engineering letter, page 4 “The proposed development will result in a building lot coverage of 3.6%. Development of up to 30% is permitted). This gives the Applicant an opportunity to build substantially more structures in the future than is currently contemplated by going through a similar application but only asking for an amendment to lot coverage. Wouldn’t you rather have less or equal number of accommodation buildings, owned by residents who care about their investment, engaged in the community and have a longterm interest in the Lake’s viability and environment, versus a Proposal with equal or more buildings, rented out to transients who would have little regard for neighbours, the Lake or our wonderful piece of Muskoka?

While it maybe comforting to hear what the Applicants are saying at their information sessions, we believe it is more important to understand what they are asking for in their Proposal. To rezone Fairview Island to institutional tourist establishment from shoreline residential is a significant change in scope, usage and implication. Ifthe Island is rezoned to CS3, institutional tourist establishment, we believe, we will have a very limited ability to influence this development now or in the future.

We encourage all those concerned neighbours to read the Poirier report and Appendices (please see attached) and also attend the Applicant sponsored information session to determine for yourself if there are any details or impacts that are lacking and an opportunity to ask questions. I am pleased to see the LOBA Newsflash, that a private meeting (Applicant and their Planner will not be attending) with the LOBA will take place right after the information session in the same location, this Saturday to hear your comments re this application. This is a great opportunity to help shape the LOBA’s opinion on the acceptability of the rezoning of Fairview Island.

Ifyou are only able to attend one meeting on this issue, the most important meeting is the June 14th, 9:30am, Planning Meeting for the Town of Huntsville, Council Chambers, Town HaIl, 37 Main Street East, Huntsville where the Planning Committee of Council will hear submissions regarding the rezoning of Fairview Island and make a decision on its suitability.

We will be urging the Town Council to turn down this application to rezone Fairview Island CS3 to prevent a private resort from being built that does not conform to the Official Plan of Huntsville nor the Official Plan of the District of Muskoka and would negatively impact the overall enjoyment of the Lake.

Regards, Richard Campbell

3 of 3

Page 185 of 268 - Forwarded message - From: richard loclde To: [email protected]

Bce: Date: Mon, 5 Jun2017 12:19:40-0400 Subject: Rezoning of Fairview Island Dear Kristin, This email is to advise you of our opposition to the rezoning plan proposed for Faitwiew Island. We are the owners of ,Huntsville. We have been owners since 1984 and as well as being taxpayers we have annually contributed to causes intended to enhance the quality of living in Huntsville and the surrounding community. We oppose the rezoning based on the negative effect this viIl have on our right to quiet enjoyment of our property. This rezoning will set a precedent for other similar developments on Lake of Bays and surrounding lakes. There is no doubt that this development will negatively effect the property values of properties around the lake. While the lower taxes on reduced property values will be helpful it wont offset the reduced enjoyment of the community. Please include this email in any correspondence to City Council. Regards, Richard and Marcia Lockie

2 Page 186 of 268 Jasmine Last

From: SheilaLabatt Sent June-05-17 3:34PM To: KirstinMaxwell;[email protected] Cc: Subject: FairviewIsland RezoningApplication

Hello Ms Maxwell,

I have a property at that looks onto Fairview Island.

I would like to register my opposition to the rezoning application for Fairview Island and ask that you convey this to the Town Council.

Thank you so much,

Sheila Labatt

Sheila Labatt Glass

1 Page 187 of 268 Jasmine Last

From: Sheila Robb Sent: June-07-17 12:15 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc:

Subject: Fairview Island, Lake of Bays objection Attachments: Letter to Huntsville Township Planner re FaiMew Island development proposal.docx

Dear Ms Maxwell, My family and Tare very concerned to hear about the proposed rezoning ofFairview Island on Lake of Bays Please find attached a letter outlining our concerns. I plan to attend the planning meeting June 14 and hope to voice my concerns at that time too. Thanks you for your consideration. Yours sincerely, Sheila Robb

1 Page 188 of 268 Kirstin Maxwell, Manager of Planning

Town of Huntsville

June?, 2017

RE:FAIRVIEWISLANDDEVELOPMENTPROPOSAL

Dear Ms. Maxwell,

Iam writing to express my family’s concerns over the proposed change in zoning for Fairview Island on Lakeof Baysfrom Seasonal Residential to Institutional Camp (C53).

Myfamily have been seasonal residents (spring, summer and fall) of Lakeof Rays for over 30 years. Our cottage is located at We look directly at Fairview Island and can see the current cottage and its dock from our cottage. It is close enough to swim to, which we have done on various occasions. We have taken care to maintain the natural waterfront plants, shrubs and trees and ensure that our property does not negatively affect the natural beauty, environment and ecology of Lakeof Bays. We regularly shop in the area and hire local enterprises for the maintenance and upkeep of our property. We spend every summer vacation there.

We do not object, in principle, to the island being used for what the developers claim is to be primarily a getaway for their family members with occasional visits from business associates. Thisto us is normal cottage use. However we see no grounds to rezone from Seasonal Residential to CS3.

What we do oppose is the application for rezoning to C53and the stated intention to create an executive retreat with a large central meeting place, rental accommodation and ancillary buildings with docks for float planes and boat traffic and potentially a heliport as well as a sizeable parking lot at Nithgrove. Despite the developers’ assurances in their Q&A,this is a massive change for the island and the lake and does not bear any resemblance to a family retreat.

There are many unanswered questions in the proposal. There is, to our knowledge, no independent study of the proposed development’s current and future environmental and land use impacts. We do not know how a substantial increase in sewage from such a large development and large scale ‘corporate’ retreats will affect the land and the lake and their

SheilaRobb Page1

Page 189 or268 plants, fish and animals. We do not know how growth will be contained and managed. Commercial zoning favours and even encourages expansion. Once granted, the genie can’t be put back in the bottle. We are very concerned that this proposed change willdamage the very basis on which Lakeof Bayshas been developed to date —asa successful, attractive, natural tourist and recreation venue. Current use already threatens the shoreline, flora and fauna. This proposed rezoning can only increase the threat and open the door to additional development. Where does all of this lead?

We are concerned that even if the current developers are sincere in their wish to create a family retreat (for which, again, there is absolutely no need to rezone the property), there is nothing to stop them selling the land to new owners who may use the institutional zoning for other purposes that would destroy the long-term environmental and ecological health of the lake.

In short, we do not believe the rezoning is justified in terms of policy nor of environmental and land use impacts on the character of the lake.

We understand that the island was, briefly, a religious camp several decades ago. Much has changed since then including higher expectations for modern conveniences (planes, helicopters etc.), easier access to electricity, brighter lighting, the use of speakers and amplifiers and faster, louder boats.

We believe that maintaining the seasonal residential zoning would be in the best interests of the lake and its permanent and seasonal population — human and animal. Single family owners who are invested in their properties and in the benefits of a peaceful getaway are more likelyto take care of their property, protect the lake and to want to maintain good relationships with their neighbours. Casual renters or large groups of retreat visitors would feel no such responsibility and would in all likelihood have little or no concern for the impact they might have on the land, the lake and the lives of others.

The Fairview Island rezoning proposal represents a major change for Lakeof Bays. I hope council willtake into account the unsuitability of the proposed rezoning from a policy and environmental perspective as well as the very worrying potential impact on the lake and all taxpayers, both residential and seasonal.

Thank you for your consideration.

Yours sincerely.

Sheila Robb cc Councillor Dan Armour Township of Huntsville

Township of Lake of Bays

SheilaRobb Page2

Page 190 of 268 MaVor, District Councillors and Area Councillors

[email protected]

NTapIey Iakeofbays.on.ca

[email protected]

MPep paid ( Ia1

TGIover(Iakeofbayson.ca

Lake of Bays Association (LOBA)

Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation (LBHF)

Fintan Robb, Shona Robb, Claude Legrand, Richard Campbell, Arlen Sternberg

SheilaRobb Page 3

Page 191of 268 From: Sonia Sent June-04-17 7:12 PM To: KirstinMaxwell Cc: Subject: Fw:Development of FairviewIsland

Kirstin,

Iam totally opposed to the development of Fairview Island. Please include my note as part of your information package at the June 14th planning meeting. Thank you. Sonia Labatt I

1 Page 192 cr268 From: Steve Earle Sent: June-06-17 9:27 AM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Zoning application for Fairview Island Attachments: Fairview Island Rezoning request.docx

Hi Kirsten,

I am a resident of Huntsville residing at and respectfully request that this application not be granted. I have outlined my reasons in the attached letter and ask that you forward it on to all members of the Town Council.

Thank you,

Stephen Earle,

1 Page 193 of 268 June 5,2017

Ms. Kirstin Maxwell Manager of Planning Town of I-luntsville 37 Main Street East Huntsville P1K IAI

Dear Kirstin

Re: Proposed Rezoning of Fairview Island in the Town of Huntsville.

I have a home at and as such ama resident in the Town of Huntsville. I attended the

open meeting on June 3 and heard the details about the rezoning of Faiiview Island. Based on the information I

heard I am asking you to not allow this rezoning application to proceed and to make my opposition known to the Town council of Huntsville.

Fainiew Island is situated in the centre of the lake. The lake is in the shape of a ‘y” and this is where all 3 legs of that “Y”join. This is where the lake is at its largest, where there is the most open water, where the wind is the best and where everyone traversing the lake passes by. The sailing club at Norway Point recognized this 50 years ago and so every day there are up to 40 sailboats and 80 children learning to sail just off the shores of this island. This is not the place for a commercial establishment.

A commercial establishment will by necessity create substantial additional traffic for staff and the frequent comings and goings of guests.This is in addition to the traffic required to provide food, materials and support services to guests and staff as well as the removal of garbage on an ongoing basis. This will all happen at the hub or centre of the lake - not in a quiet, off the beaten path location. While the current plans indicate the

“Corporate Retreat” appear to be of a modest size, it is seldom that commercial ventures of this sort are scaled down and over time inevitably increase in size and demands on the environment.

Page 194 of 268 Due to its location it has the potential to have some form of impact on many of the residents on the lake — in both Huntsville and Lake of Bays Township. This should not be a location that is zoned commercial.

Lastly, lalso have a personal reason that is shared by many of my neighbours. I live right beside the

Huntsville town park This has a small dock, a small dirt trailer launch and some space

Forfamilies to relax and enjoy the water and the quiet time a park oflbrs. The primary users are Huntsville

Familieswho live nearby and do not have water access. My concern is that rezoning Fairview will create substantially increased boat tralic and construction barges at this public dock. This could have a substantial impact on the ability of those Families to peacefully enjoy their time at the park. Occasionally a construction barge uses the dock today which blocks trailer access and impacts everyone’s enjoyment of the park. lam attaching a picture so you can see what one barge will do. It does not take much imagination to determine the impact if many barges use tins more frequently

Page 195 of 268 In summary, this is the wrong place for commercial zoning and I request that this application not he granted. I ask that you please pass this letter and my thoughts on to the members of Town council.

Sincerely

Stephen Earle

Page 196 of268 This our keep Fairview. of Please rezoning mainland. http://www.huntsville.ca/. the the to against through Of close so totally Behalf are island On Brown 268 an of I Huntsville with 197 Suzanne of Page and keeping in Hugh Taxpayers Browr not and issue. Sue and this and use on [mailto:infoesoIutionsgroup.caj Hugh vote by you PM commercial you a at to to when island 12:13 sent lead Message- mind cottagers was Calleja in Fairview could infoesolutionsgroup.ca June-05-17 email Tanya lifetime -Original From: change concerns Subject: As Sent:

To: This I- From: Sue Brown Sent June-05-17 11:59 AM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview Island

We as life time cottagers at and taxpayers of the Town of Huntsville are totally against the change of zoning of Fairview Island. This change is open to a commercial zoning and not in keeping with the closeness of the island to the mainland. Hugh and Suzanne Brown

1 Page 198 of 268 is vans of our of The lake that council hour I cars, the feet from another? especially to slips, 24 14th principal of private by for However, decision 70 as along of very but in not on description The My June elsewhere. be all report prevent Fairview. arrive email. bottom the of demand to can Fairview to would number your cottages of this limited the to situated departing manage in how rezoning. the sizes at expressed urge dock, and considered. to I setting to on ahead the re-zoning expected wave size seen to details plan distance tourists zone Nithgrove are fatality) Furthermore general and burden the the council at What one 30-50 planned haven’t insufficient, very into information I environment rigorous dock twice tourists unfair the the opposition (and a are the commercial shoreline? an in little for delve conditions purpose. Huntsville a more is of a These from about and provides in plane concern not assets fear the the very a those Island - is by have for to wilt float away 268 lighting weather section report, to approximately of needed persons supplies. and, and one is There safety questions the on-shore voice to be 199 Such Fairview small and meters Nithgrove. a needs well of my and and the boat Page at as inadequate island. zoning. 50 density; safety AM already by would regards one consideration and such is engineering wind lot the and luggage emails and on for accidents? 10:31 Fairview shelter others re-zoning which island wife’s Duke actions there council north of from with no by proposed many Rd an Maxwell avoid parking my health is the commercial the squeeze the needed to a and argument; package met, case my a to What Tapscott night to of a the add to be raised to due we for there the Bill tight Regarding Kirstin June-05-17 from and out end will In with Nithgrove especially been including and taken Islands. very and far day when at necessary a together point formally but be is to provenance location response the have the be be to to rough facilities will at Poirier, demand. of Solomon the concerns: managed help. to is environment like Roothog like at putting of of timely be attention. Ms. on Fairview shuttled mentioned lighting your shore goods and hours I are concerns by water storage seems wilt Sharon be for your would would as all their for I I & establishment all and Inappropriate Stress Validity you number The and at

to Last shore for residents and It south a these asset and Wahawin. 1. 2. 3. Fairview again transportation Lastly, this the you and on in people submitted sure is ‘tourist’ buses off concern Tapscott season Kirstin: am place marine Bill boathouse brings meeting based onshore and shoreline. Any how watercraft Thanks plan significant. street shore. From: Hi I All Subject: understand transportation Cc:

one This Jasmine just Thank Sent To: From: Tracy Campbell Sent: June-04-17 4:04 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: Subject: June 14 meeting

Dear Kristen: Please include this email as part of the information package to be sent to the Planning Committee for the June 14 meeting.

Iwould like to be clear that I am against rezoning Fairview Island.

Here are my concerns:

1. It is not clear - the description for CS3 zoning - where mainland parking exists for 50+ guests - the intended use of the island which they plan to rent” out - how many stories the buildings will be especially the Central Accommodation and Facilities building - what outdoor recreation facilities they will be building - what fuel will be used for the generators - staff accommodation

2. The shoreline, fish/animal habitats and natural environment will be affected with -6,350 sq. ft. of docks (818 sq. ft. exists now) - extensive lit pathways & 11 buildings (in my 40 yrs. on the lake, I’ve not seen a light on the island) - removal of trees and vegetation for 32,813 sq. ft. buildings footprint, 1.5 acre septic bed, leeching beds, concrete pads for 11 transformers, generators, helipad, construction ramp and 10’ wide paths with ditches, culverts and hydro lines - noise from 50+ people on the island

3. Boat traffic will increase with, as the Planning Report and Duke Engineering Reports describe, “large cruise boats, commercial vessels such as water taxis, a variety of private boats, helicopter services, air boats, snowmobiles and caravan float planes”.

4. weekend guests will not respect the lake, environment or local cottagers as would people who have ownership on the lake.

5. Once it is rezoned, it would be difficult to ever have it zoned residential again, there is the potential for a future owner to develop 30% of the island and this zoning could set a precedent for the many other islands on Lake of Bays.

5. Lake of Bays is becoming over-developed and this island should be protected.

Thank you, Tracy

Page 200 of 268 From: TracyCampbell Sent: May-27-1710:20AM To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: FaiMewIsland

Dear Kirsun:

As a full time resident on Lake of Bays and who’s husband has been cottaging on Lake of Bays for well over 100 years, Pm writing because lam concerned about the proposed development ofFain’iew Island. It is my understanding that what the Konrad Group and their planner Marie Poirier are saying and what they are actually going to build on the island over the next several years, are two completely different things. My main concern is the re-zoning to commercial which does not seem necessary if they are going to build only what they are suggesting. Also, I fail to see how this re-zoning would return the island back to a serene Christian camp that did not have hydro or septic. Building a helipad, 2500 sq. ft. dock, lit pathways. facilities for float planes, several large buildings, septic for a large number of guests, etc. does not sound anything remotely similar to how the island once was.

I would hope that you would be concerned for the many families that will be directly impacted by the increased boat traffic, noise pollution, developed shoreline, dark sky, etc. not to mention the huge impact on this sensitive environment and our unique lake. I do not believe that 50* guests on a retreat’ would have any regard for the lake and cottagers unlike people who could own property if the island were subdivided into the only 7 (not 20) lots that this acreage would allow.

Please do not aLlowthis island to be re-zoned which would be disastrous for surrounding residents and the environment.

Sincerely, Tracy Campbell

1 Page 201 of 268 From: BillTroost Sent: June-05-17 6:31 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: L Subject: Rezoning of Fairview Island Attachments: Fairview Island Letter.docx

Dear Ms. Maxwell,

Attached is our letter objecting to the rezoning of Fairview Island for tourist commercial use.

Thank you for your consideration,

Kathleen and BillTroost

1 Page 202 of 268 Kirstin Maxwell,

Manager of Planning, June 4, 2017

Town of Huntsville

Re: The application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law— Fairview Island in Lake of Bays

Dear Ms. Maxwell,

We are residents of on Lake of Bays, right across from Fairview Island, and will thus be directly and negatively affected if Fairview Island were to be rezoned for tourist commercial use.

We believe the proposed rezoning does not properly address the impact it will have on the lake water quality, does not confirm to either the District of Muskoka or the Town of Huntsville Official Plan, does not address the resulting increased traffic and parking on Nithgrove Road and the Glenmount dock area, and does not address the increased noise from such a commercial operation.

It would severely affect the enjoyment of our Lake of Bay residence and therefore we strenuously object to the proposal.

Sincerely,

Kathleen and BillTroost

Page 203 cr268 From: VickyWeaver Sent: June-05-17 8:26 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject Fairview Island - Lake of Bays - Concerns about purchase

Dear Kirstin Maxwell,

Please forward my concerns to Town Council of Huntsville in Preparation for June 14, 2017— Planning Meeting.

Everyone to whom I have mentioned the subject is concerned about the access to Fairview Island in all stages of potential use. Planning, building, support, during all the stages of change to this island. Nithgrove Road property is not highly agreed to be a good spot for builders supplies, and eventually guests cars who will stay on the island to park. I am aware of all the research work that Arlen Sternberg, my neighbour has done, sol concur that many of the points he has legally brought up need to be discussed and addressed. lam hopeful that the Town of Huntsville and Township of Lake of Bays can work together for the common good of the residents on Lake of Bays.

Thank you for your courtesy.

Sincerely yours,

1 Page 204 of 268 -Original Message- From: Dan Armour Sent: September-06-17 7:31 AM To: Cc: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Re: The proposed Official Plan Amendment (OPA#13) and

Thank you for your email, your concerns are are shared by many. This will be included in the report to the planning committee and councillors

Daniel Armour Brunel Ward Councillor

> On Sep 5, 2D17, at 22:42, > > Dear Mr. Armour, > We are writing regarding the proposed Amendment to the Official Plan & re-zoning of Fairview Island, Lake of Bays, and proposed Commercial Development on same. > > We are opposed to the possible rezoning of Fairview Island as Commercial or Institutional Tourist when it seems to many of us and our advisors who have extensive planning experience that they can achieve what they want under the Residential Zoning with a few simple Variances. > > We are against any change in Zoning for this property. > > Furthermore, we are opposed to any sort of central building with 8+ bedrooms as it seems unnecessary to achieve their goal of a retreat for their family members and a perk / reward to their business associates and employees. The development on the island should be limited to the 7 or8 residences that it seems a residential zoning would allow.

> There hasn’t been any concrete explanation or binding agreements that would allow the Konrads to transport building materials, heavy construction equipment, guests, etc. to the island without relying on the mainland property on Nithgrove Drive. We all find it hard to believe that supply shipments and guests would be directed to Marinas on the north or east ends of the lake when closer access is available at Nithgrove. >

I Page 205 of 268 > Ifthe development is allowed to proceed the Konrads should be required to obtain a mainland access point in a more appropriate location in Huntsville territory, rather than Nithgrove Drive. > > In addition, if for some reason this was allowed to proceed there should be a stipulation that the Managed Forrest on Fairview remain in perpetuity. > > We all pride ourselves on the condition of “our” lake that we strive so hard to take care of so everyone can enjoy it. We are upset at the thought of 50-60 “guests” partying on Fairview to the early hours of the morning. To suggest as the Konrads did that this would never happen is ridiculous. > > We have no objection in allowing the Konrads to proceed with their project under the residential Zoning that exists presently. > > Our preferred course of action is that the property remain as Residential Zoning and that their plans be reduced in scale to allow same under the Residential zoning with only minor Variances. > > Please include this letter in any report to City Council where appropriate. > > Yours truly, > > David & Linda Bennett

> Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetvourCouncillors.asp >

> This email was sent to you by David & Linda Benr through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

2 Page 206 of 268 Jasmine Last

From: Brian Gibbings Sent September-04-17 10:35 AM To: Jasmine Last Cc: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: RE:Notice of Meeting - OPA#13 & Z/22/2017/HTE - 100 Fairview Island

Fyi ...Kirsten and Jasmine,

My memo (below) to Huntsville Council members, sent through the Town website today.

Regards,

Brian

Opposed to Rezoning Fairview Is. To Commercial CS3

As a resident of , Baysville area, Lake of Bays Township, I do not vote in Huntsville but am affected by the development proposal before you.

I attended one of the information sessions by the rezoning proponents and studied it carefully before taking an opposing view, organized a petition by many local residents and cottagers and forwarded it to your planner, Kirsten Maxwell, some weeks ago.

Leaving aside the technical demerits of the Fairview site plan to others, the point Iwant make is that Huntsville Council has no good reason to change the zoning.

Why put yourselves in the position of picking winners and losers when there is a perfectly valid zoning SR4.

The winners are few: Langfords who can sell at a price conditional on rezoning; Ms. Poirier, paid to advance a proposal; and the Konrads’ overreach for corporate use.

The losers are many: The overwhelming numbers of voters and interested parties expressing opposition to rezoning.

The existing zoning SR4 enables the orderly and controlled building and rebuilding of cottage island property...a regimen all of us have happily abided all these years.

Accordingly, Huntsville Council should be listening to the will of the people, observing the social contract with them not to harm their interests, and therefore not change the zoning for no good reason.

Brian Gibbings

September 4, 2017

I Page 207 of 268 -Original Message- From: Scott Aitchison Sent: September-05-17 2:36 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas; Karin Terziano Subject: FW: Against the rezoning of Fairview Island

From: [email protected] Behalf Sent: September-05-17 2:35:37 PM (UTC-05:0O)Eastern Time (US & Canada) To: Scott Aitchison Subject: Against the rezoning of Fairview Island

Scott

We the Clements Family at Lake of Bays are against the rezoning of Fairview Island from residential to commercial.

Marilyn Clements

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetvourMayor.asp

This email was sent to you by Dave Clement through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

1 Page 208 of 268 From: Kathryn Cronin Sent: September-06-17 2:30 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fw: Opposing re-zoning of Faiwiew Island

Trying this again. Thanks Kirstin for ensuring this email is part of the package that is being forwarded to the planning committee later today. Much appreciated.

Forwarded Message From: Kathryn Cronini To:

Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 2:18 &M Subject: Opposing re-zoning of Fairview Island

Hello Councillors,

We continue to be FERVENTLY OPPOSED to the re-zoning of Fariview Island. For the reasons outlined below we believe that a commerical operation has no place at our end of Lake of Bays, and would ask that you turn down the re-zoning application being sought by the new owners, the Konrads. Please do the right thing and turn down the proposed application.

Ms Maxwell could you please ensure that this email is part of the package that is being forwarded Planning Committee later today. Please confirm you have received this note.

Thank you for your consideration.

Dr Donald B Montgomery

Tom & Kathryn Cronin (nee Montgomery)

1 Page 209 ci 268 From: Kathryn Cronin I To:

sent: Saturday, June 3,2OT112:21 frM Subject: Opposing rezoning of Fairview Island

Dear Sir/Madam,

Our family are longtime residents of and we object to the proposed re-zoning / redevelopment of Fairview Island, and would like to register our opposition at this time.

Please confirm you have received this note.

Respectfully yours, Dr Donald B Montgomery Tom & Kathryn Cronin (nee Montgomery)

2 Page 210 of 268 From: Dawson, Barbara Sent September-04-17 4:10 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Karen Terziano; [email protected] Subject: Proposed Re-Zoning of Fairview Island

Importance: High

Dear Ms. Maxwell, Members of the Planning Committee and all Councilors in the Town of Huntsville,

My husband, family and I are residents of Hunstville as owners of a property on which is DIRECTLY(500 yards to be precise) across from Fairview Island. This property, like so many cottage properties is an integral part of our family life and it has brought much joy to our lives and those of our adult children. It is our haven, our place to go to spend time together as a family, remove ourselves from the hectic pace of our working lives, unplug and enjoy the beauty and peace that is Lake of Bays.

I write on behalf of my family with regard to the re-zoning application circulated by the Town of Huntsville. We received this documentation and have attended all of information meetings on this matter.

Every new opportunity to understand the intentions of those requesting this re-zoning has brought to light more and more alarming information with respect to the purchasers’ intentions. The information needle has moved from the wish of establishing a family compound and place to occasionally host employees, to a commercial venture that wishes to rent out the space usa corporate retreat, or rent to large groups. Information within the application included the proposed buyers’ intentions to include a helicopter pad and long dock built for the purpose of accommodating a number of float planes.

The amended application has not taken into account ANYof the feedback or concerns of the residents of the area. For example, the provision within the plan for an ACCESSORYbuilding (many units with washrooms) that would be situated on the island directly across from Clovelly Point. Direct questions to the proposed owners did not provide any enlightenment as to whether this would be used to house the transient occupants, or staff required to run the facility. Given its location, this too would present a serious noise concern to the cottages located 500 yards from Fairview. It is clearly evident to all of us who have taken the time to attend these sessions that the proposed owners have no intention of accommodating, or being sensitive to the concerns of the current cottage residents of Huntsville or Lake of Bays. What they propose is we believe, absolutely against the intention of the intended recreational COTTAGEexperience and purpose for the already existing residents of this area.

The precise reason we have bought and enjoy this space is to remove ourselves from this kind of noise and commercial activity. Approving this re-zoning would ruin the enjoyment and intent of family gatherings, relaxation and quiet that is so much a part of our Lake of Bays experience. Our family feels strongly that should this development go ahead, it would be like having a Marriott Red Leaves development (on Lake Rousseau) plunked down 500 yards from our cottage. Transient occupation of the island could include guests who do not necessarily understand or respect the intent of this cottage space; thus ruining the enjoyment our tightly knit community has enjoyed for many years.

We also believe the overall intent of this plan is one of a commercial, NOT recreational nature and thus is harmful to the enjoyment of all cottagers on Lake of Bays; and particularly those who, like us are located so close to Fairview. As others have stated, corporate interests AREfundamentally different from private residential owners.

I Page 211 of 268 Allother commercial entities on Lake of Bays operate their businesses during normal business hours. All marinas close down when darkness falls; Bigwin when their dining room closes. Only on the odd occasion does Bigwin operate later in the evening. What is being contemplated on Fairview island would have NO restrictions on its hours of operation. Further we would argue that its busiest and loudest hours would be in the evening when occupants have finished eating and are set to begin partying — probably into the wee hours of the night. Sound travels over water and especially at night when the wind dies down. On calm days we can hear the vacuum and the radio from the existing buildings on the island closest to Clovelly Point. Noise from transient occupants partying would sound as if it was happening in our bedrooms!

HOW would you enforce the noise bylaw in this instance? Do you have an enforcement officer that would patrol, or visit the island by boat? How would any of the residents; and especially those of us to close by, be able to report and hope for redress when this occurs?

We have been taxpayers in the Township of Huntsville (having just paid our latest tax bill!) and have never requested any special treatment or consideration from your Council or the Town. It has taken this very special and serious situation to galvanize a number of concerned citizens in both the Township of Huntsville and Lake of Bays to act and request your attention to our concerns.

Forall of these reasons, and after much consideration we formally request that you and your colleagues decline this proposaifor re-zoning.

Further, we request this correspondence be included as part of the information package for the planning committee briefing documents and any correspondence to the Town Council on this matter.

Sincerely,

The Dawson Family Huntsville Ontario.

2 Page 212 ci 268 Jasmine Last

From: Wendy Duncan Sent: September-06-17 1:01 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview Island

>To: Kirstin Maxwell > Manager of Town Planning > Town of Huntsville

> Dear Kirstin > I’mwriting to you again to urge your Planning Committee to reject the proposal to change the zoning of Fairview

Island to “Institutional Tourist Establishment” , thus permitting a commercial venture in this quiet residential lakeside corner of the Town of Huntsville. >

I could practically just resend the email I sent you on iune 17 because Marie Poirier’s current proposal is virtually the same as the earlier one.

>However, I will state again our objections and request that you PLEASEINCLUDETHISEMAILAS PARTOF THE PACKAGEBEINGFORWARDEDTO THEPLANNINGCOMMIHEE MEMBERSPRIORTO THE MEETINGNEXTWEDNESDAY.

> 1. If the Konrads are clear in their plans for Fairview, then there is no need to give a commercial designation to the Island, a dangerous precedent-setting move for a quiet part of Lake of Bays. The Konrads can do almost everything they propose with the current designation. > > 2. There are huge environmental concerns, none of which have been adequately addressed in the preamble or the by law proposal. > There is no demonstrated plan for sewage or garbage disposal or water quality protection for an operation this size. > The noise of such an operation would have a major impact on the whole lake, but particularly on Clovelly, which is so close you can hear the island dogs barking.

>3. Access has not been suitably addressed. They say they will only use Nithgrove for the” residential component” with most people using “nearby” marinas. However, do you really think people going to Fairview would choose to travel 7 or S kilometres by boat from Baysville or South Portage, particularly in the frequent high winds - or drive another 40 or 50 minutes to Port Cunnington - when there is a landing at Nithgrove, just a few minutes by boat from Fairview. BUT,this landing area only permits one boat and two cars, with space down the road for a few more cars - not nearly enough space for the size of operation the Konrads propose. > > For all the above reasons, and those elaborated on by other residents of Lake of Bays, we urge you and the Huntsville Planning Committee to reject the proposed by- law change. > > Wendy and Gordon Duncan

1 Page 213 of 268 August 31, 2017

SENTBYEMAIL:[email protected]

Tanya Calleja Municipal Clerk Town of Huntsville Town Hall,37 Main Street East Huntsville, ON P1H1A1

Dear Ms. Calleja:

Re: Planning Committee of Council — Public Meeting of September 13, 2017 - Proposed Amendment to the Official Plan of the Town of Huntsville and Proposed Amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-66P — Island No. 2 (Fairview Island), Lake of Bays

Asyou will recall, Irepresent a group of about 27 families, residents of Huntsville and other areas that would be impacted by the proposed development of Fairview Island. Asyou will also recall from my letter to you of June 8°L my clients, myself, and our planner, Robert Lehman, had planned on attending the original Public Meeting for this matter set for June 14th My clients went to considerable effort and expense to prepare forthat attendance, includingthe submission of a detailed (and highlycritical) planning analysis of the proposal, by Mr. Lehman.

14th We were disappointed with the forfeiture of the June date and, as Isaid in my letter to you, we required meaningful notice of the return date for the next Public Meeting, and a reasonable opportunity to review any further materials submitted. Regrettably, the announcement of the rescheduling of the Public Meeting to 1:30 p.m. on September 13th was given on minimum notice, with the result that our ability to respond and provide full commentary to the changes to the applications has been seriously compromised.

Despite the rushed re-scheduling, we will endeavour to assemble our large group of Huntsville 13th residents to attend on September and will prepare a written response to the latest justification for the proposal. However, Mr. Lehman is not available that afternoon. In the interests of fairness to my clients, and for the sake of a complete discussion about the merits of the proposal before the Committee, we would respectfully request that the hearing of the Public Meeting be re-scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. on September 13th, to allow Mr. Lehman to attend and speak to the Committee.

Page 215 of 268 Jasmine Last

From: Harold Elston Sent: August-31-17 5:08 PM To: Tanya Calleja Cc: Kirstin Maxwell; Robert Lehman; Harold Elston; Barry Morrison Subject: September 13th Public Meeting - Fairview Island Attachments: Letter to Clerk Aug 31, 2017.pdf

Dear Ms. Calleja:

Please find attached, correspondence requesting a change in the time of this public meeting.

Yours truly,

Harold G. Elston Barrister & Solicitor Integrity Commissioner I

1 Page 214 of 268 In the circumstances, we believe this to be a more than reasonable request for accommodation, which will allow the Committee to receive and consider the planning arguments from both sides.

I would also respectfully submit that the Town’s Procedural By-law provides you and the Committee the ability to make this slight change.

Thank you for your consideration of my request.

Yours very truly,

Harold C. Elston c.c. Kirsten Maxwell, Manager of Planning Barry Morrison, Lakeof BaysAssociation Robert Lehman clients

Page 216 of 268 Jasmine Last

From: Gilles Hickey Sent: September-05-17 11:32 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Re: Fair-viewIsland Rezoning

Ms. Maxwell,

Further to the note that I sent in June, I am writing to reiterate my opposition to the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island. After reviewing the revised materials, I continue to believe that this application is not consistent with the nature and integrity of our community. It appears quite obviously that this is an attempt to play by different rules than everyone else on Lake olBays.

Living on and facing South, our view of Fairview Island is the primary feature of our home and enjoying the breathe-taking view and sharing a cold beverage with my family is what I most closely associate with Muskoka. Preserving the shoreline and the serenity of Fairview is imperative to our continued enjoyment of Lake of Bays. The thought of selling our cherished family gathering place has caused me unparalleled stress and loss of sleep. This ridiculous proposal is simple unfathomable.

I regret that I will not be able to attend the Sep. 13th meeting, however please include this letter and my previous comments in the official record.

Please confirm receipt.

Regards, Gilles Hickey

On Sun, Jun 4,2017 at 10:54 PM, Gilles Hickcy wrote:

Ms. Maxwell &the Town of Huntsville —

I would like to formally state my opposition to the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island.

I believe that the proposed plan threatens our community on multiple levels:

I. Negative impact to the natural beauty, aesthetics, etc. 2. Introduces environmental risks (Water quality, natural ecology, regional wildlife) 3. Negative impact to the community culture:

1 Page 217 of 268 o Our relationships with our neighbors is a massive part of our enjoyment of Huntsville o Corporate interests are fundamentally different than those of private residential owners 4. Sets a precedent for commercialization of residential areas and environmentally unique geographies 5. Introduces the risk of high-turnover weekenders” — short term rentals, summer camps, etc. 6. Introduces the risk of incremental commercialization and corporate development

I have never considered selling our property and leaving the community until reviewing this plan — this is a terrifying prospect, which concerns me deeply.

With respect,

Gilles Hickey

2 Page 215 of 268 Jasmine Last

From: Jacquie Godard Sent: September-07-17 12:11 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview Island Rezoning...

Good morning. I live at ., and am a very concerned resident. For one the impact on those cottaging on Clovelly, for some a few generations, would be devistating. The noise and light pollution from a corporate retreat will be like having a constant party all summer long. Konrad Group own many companies and therefore have many employees. The garbage, the sewage, the propane for generators (outages), the parking, the ferrying are some of the concerns that come with this. Where willthe barges and construction materials be ferried from is another concern? Where on the mainland will hydro run from? The Konrad boys have no feelings for those whose families have a history here and are passionate about protecting our lake, They are only concerned about making their own history along with the revenue it will bring in. We have to stop the insanity of commercial development on island/s before it’s too late. What if the Konrad’s decide it’s not for them. The horses will have already left the coral. While I’m at it...Iam very concerned about the recent sale of Langmaid’s and the access property next to Big Print and between our new neighbours. We could be really impacted by this and if so will put up a fight. Apparently, the owners want to create several properties and what a shame. This access property could turn into a commercial parking lot if we are not vocal. It’s zoned as residential, but this too could change. An example on a small scale...We only just received a notice from Huntsville’s Committee of Adjustment re 4’ closer to shoreline that our neighbours ‘new build’ just happens to be since an old dock was removed prior to recent survey. We will not oppose this as want to get along with our neighbours and this has a very small impact and since the concrete has already been poured into the ICEwalls. The point here is...the horses have already left the coral and this example shows that this could very well happen on a much bigger scale. We rely on our town planners, councillors, and committees to give the people their very best in support, particularly those who will be impacted the most. The Konrad Kids have what I refer to as ‘new money’ and are not of the same stock or share the same values. Surely, by now you must see this. iacquie and Richard Godard

Page 219 of 268 I

-Original Message- From: [email protected] [mailto:info@esolutionsgroupxa] On Behalf Of Sent: September-06-17 11:22 AM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Fairview Island Application to Rezone

Please make sure that the letter attached to this email forms part of the package that is being forwarded on to the Planning Committee on September 6th.

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetYourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Lisa Walke through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

1 Page 220 of 268 IlelenAdelt-_\\alkei

Auw.t3l. 2i)!7

Town of Hi yiisille Planning Depanmeni 37 Mali Si. E

Runn,viile, (Tc P111 L\ I

Tcn;misinn b entail: plan ninwii hiiniscillc,r-,i

Re: Proposed amendment to the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law to enable the development of an insdtudonal tourist establishment. The lands are known as Island No.2 (Fairview Island) hi Lake of Bays.

Dear COULCU of die Tbwn of Huntsville and the fhivor of Huntsville,

I am tL pcwin cidzen ut the icia of 1-Itiniavillewith cur cottage residing at Please accept this letter as our oflinal opposition to the proposed amendment as outlineil above..j\Iso. please .tccpi this linier as our olhciai request to be nobh€d of councils decision regarding sinie We understand tli;t this letter enqitlesu, robe ndded as a parts to the heantig of au appeal h,eforcdie Ontanu _\Iiunopal Board. Please ensure that this lener is Fonarded to Council of the Town of 11unuwillehcthre the officialPlan Amendment is adopted or before the by—lawis pas&cI

Also please include this letter in any correspondenre sent to div council,.

Our iindersiandmg is that therc is considerable opposition front residents and their Iuniies who live on Lake of Bays to ihis proposed amendment. 1:Helen Adele Valket and an enure hunth oppose tInsproposed imendrneni on the foflrnCinghasis:

L ike nfhckd plan and current zoning is in place in protein tw ights of owners and IL ensure that unwantrd development tines not interfere cr change the surrounding pmpeiw enironment We have had our thrnilycottage here for decacbc and a1ttad with the change in zoning cloneReveralvenrs ago on Nirherove we hod that ie arc now rrsiding. unIv separated by 2 cottage proper ies ftom the paikthg lot ihat is used icr access to fainie island which has rectdted in increased vehicle n’afhr using the panting lot. inn-eased hoar rrai& and noise at all huur frompeople going ic and o 1mm Pain-inc Island. A further zoning cliaiie to Fairvicts Island nill i:2UIflkirther inrreae vehjrle n’amc,boat iralTicand noise rcsultui iii further disruption 10 US and the surrounding neihboLirs

Page 221 of 268 2. 1am against increased hoar irafhc on the lake in tront ol our rnrrae and the noise levelsas 2 resuli of TheNithgmve parking lot hemg used as the pickup and remrmng pomi of people going and coming from a insutunonal development being entertained on an Island close to our cottage that is not legal with the exi;ring 700inrz and bvla;vs

that are in place. Increased Imat trarnr antI inon wavesill be haeardou to on grci izrand-children vhile sdmming in front ol our cottage.

3. I’m concerned about boai safety and irttrcaecI lcQhtin the night sk as nell. not Lo niendon noise thai could restdt in sucu high levelsof on the island epuciaII ii the iland is used as u corporate :e1reL or rented ‘JUL 4e kiiot Otit ncil,hotirc and respect each oilier nincli will trot be die case il clients and isitot s

iiwade our rom munit\%

I. In addition to our local issues we un uciucerued about the environment wdi the addition oran “ii,srñudonal ramp” on Eurview Island. \V are concerned aboni The proposed rlnrlopmenr and major imparts on the forest üfl the island, the vegetation seater qualm: hsh and water habitat, wild life habitat, noise. light, garhaue ann

pnilludon etc. . There is nor a single benefit to local residence, or the environment lhr allowing tlfls development to proceed.

3. 1am concerned alioLit tIIC’ parking lot on Nitligrove being used as a fern situ for httildlitii Ihe proposed stnicttiics and lack of Ituicdonal coritwls over die land use after development is given the go ahead. Overparking, increased dock space. more clearing and incite parking development axe sure to (allan ti I do not want any garbage containers situng (in the Nithgnive properr rolletdng garbage from people using Fain1es Island or having to deid w)th commercial pick up being intnidtire

7. We aru a neiglrbuurltoodheit on Nidrrove. Weinteract as neialibuur and Uth proposed arneaidincnt would add in an insdtudon which changes the dvnamic.sol 0111 i;iicractioir as tjeitiibows. W, lcac cur iIOT1IC rn IflCcity and ueniic iii Lath of Bass

to geL asva from that dvnanñc. _-\.ftcrdecades of cuuaging on Like of Ba;s I find this proposal to be a total betrayal of the w.od hull in which we purchased our pmpcrn: We iiaitt to prokut our lake. our crwimnnieiti and our quahiv of life on Like ci Bars Ve espect our local government to protect our needs and rights. You maybe required to review rcclues lot zoningand bvlan changes ir those nho wish to Irendit (win the requested change but your duty as our government is to protect our needs and rights and those ci the cominunhls io like u are also ni opposition to ainendi ig the olhciailplan .mci bylaws to allow an unwanted development

Sinred cv

Helen Adele Walkri

Page 222 c(268 Jasmine Last

From: Deborah Sent: September-05-17 9:41 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: OPPOSEDto Fairview Island Rezoning Attachments: 2017-09 Town of Huntsville Letter of Opposition.docx

HiKristin: Please read our attached letter expressing our thoughts in regard to the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island and include it in the meeting on September 13th. Thank you, Confirm receipt, please. Regards, Deborah and Patrick Hickey

1 Page 223 of 268 September 5th 2017

A letter to the Town of Huntsville Councilors and Planner Regarding Request to Rezone Fairview Island, Lake of Bays

Dear Councilors and Town Planner:

We have been property owners of’ Huntsville since 1978 and are now primary residents of the address. We have raised our family with the center of all activities around our cottage life. We have invested and sacrificed to maintain our beautiful home built in 1913 for all these years. We have supported the Town of Huntsville with our tax payments annually. As our professional lives have taken us to many other cities, we always look forward to return to our Lake of Bays.

Lake of Bays is a tranquil lake of insurmountable beauty. We enjoy the quality of lakeside living for the following reasons: pristine lake water, peaceful and quiet environment, respectful neighbors who comprise the Clovelly Point Cottagers Association, a private location exclusive to family life and family cottages, dark night skies and undisturbed nature including birds, fish and wildlife. There is very limited public access for launching boats onto the lake thus keeping with the character we have enjoyed forever.

We are NOT IN FAVOR to alter the zoning of Fairview Island from a Residential zone to a Conmiercial Institutional Camp, CS3. Our cottage and our neighbors on Clovelly Point are in the closest proximity to the island from any direction. It is our back yard! A rezoning for an Adult Retreat Camp would change the complete atmosphere and safety of our lake front property. Rezoning would drastically and unfairly reduce the value of our real estate. We have invested in the Town of Huntsville with the knowledge that we live in a Residential Shoreline community and it should remain so.

13th, Please include this letter to your Council Meeting on September 2017.

Respectfully,

Deborah and Patrick Hickey

Page 224 cr268 Jasmine Last

From: Peter Irwin Sent August-31-17 9:45 AM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject Fairview Island- Sept13 Planning Meeting

Kirsten,

I would like to formally go on record again and oppose the rezoning of Fairview Island. lam a seasonal tax paying resident of Huntsville located at and very concerned that the proposed rezoning would be extremely disruptive to Lake of Bays and the quiet enjoyment of our residential properties. My residence along with several others on Clovelly Point are very close to the island where a zoning change would have a dramatic impact. The proposed rezoning does not conform to the Town’s Official Plan (nor that of the District) and would enable a corporate retreat for an internet company to entertain its employees and customers. This will result in significant noise issues for the residents of Clovelly Point which is in very close proximity along with increased boat traffic, environmental issues and a decline in the natural beauty of the island. We purchased our property with the knowledge that the island was zoned residential, not commercial, and expect the Town to maintain that zoning.

I would appreciate your assistance in ensuring that this letter forms part of the public record and is included in any correspondence with the Planning Committee or Town Council.

Sincerely, Peter Irwin

1 Page 225 of 268 738}: Faiwiew Island application for zoning change.

—-rcplyiIioc tIii

Forwarded message -_____ From: jasmine.IasthuntsvilIe.ca Date: 6/25/2017 4:49:09 PM Subject: FaiMew Island application for zoning change.

Good afternoon,

Thank you for submitting your comments. I have forwarded them to the planner working on the file so that they will be shared with the Planning Committee.

Kind regards,

Jasmine Last Planning Customer Service Representative I (705) 789-1751 Town of Huntsville I www.huntsville.ca

From: Date: 8/24/2017 5:18:55 PM Subject: Fairview Island application for zoning change.

Hello, we, Peggy and Arndt Kruger, , do object to the change of the zoning. We do not see any good credible reason for the Konrad Group to get this kind of exception. Listening to their last presentation they could achieve everything they said they wanted to do on the island while keeping the present zoning. Perhaps one or more aspects of residential zoning bylaws may have to be broadened but that is all they need.

We felt at some points their presentation wasn’t quite honest about their real intentions. They talked about wanting to keep this a ‘familyretreat’ with ‘just’26 bedrooms and an equal number of bathrooms and a 5000sqft central building for meetings/retreats. Allof this willcreate a sizable influx of people who have really very little ‘true connection’ with the beauty, calm and serenity of the lake, as they emphasized in their presentation.

People who live at the lake for a season respect the beautiful nature and their neighbours and develop a sense of responsibility for the lake. People who come for a day or two willhardly be able to connect to nature, the lake and the neighbours. They willbe on the island to enjoy not being in an office in a big city which is nice for them but willthey also think of the cottagers living around them??

Finally, why do they need this zoning change - just to make the property more valuable for a later

1 Page 226 of 268 resale? Why don’t we all apply for such a zoning change? What do we know about the people who willcome after the Konrad Group? Willthey come the same intention? What assurances willthe lake community have at that point??

We oppose this request for a zoning change. Arndt and Peggy Kruger

2 Page 227 cr268 From: SONIA LABAU Sent: August-31-17 3:15 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: Arthur Labatt; Peter Irwin Subject: Fairview Island

l(irstin,

Ithought that Iwould let you know that we are at and are totally opposed to the development of Fairview Island. Please make sure that the Planning Department is aware of our opposition to this development. Sonia Labatt

Page 228 of 268 Jasmine Last

From: LillyBarnes Sent: September-06-1711:19 AM To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: FairviewIsland

Greetings, Here are a few of the objections we have to the re-zoninu of Fairview Island.

The “revised plan” claims to address the concerns of the Lake of Bays communities. It doesn’t. I attended 2 o(’the information meetings and the main concern expressed, the largest opposition, was to the re-zoning of Fairview Island.

Given the amount of building, of proposed usage, and of the traffic to and from the Island, it is imperative that there be a thorough study and assessment of the impact on the waters of Lake of Bays prior to any decision about re-zoning.

As owners of the property adjacent to the “NW grove Road Access” point, we expressed concerns (more than once) that parking and docking would greatly increase. We heard repeated assertions that there are letters from marinas, offering their facilities for docking and parking. No numbers were mentioned. Are we going to see a stream of overflow paring and boast ferrying people to and fro?

Iwouldlikethis email to be a part of the package that is being forwarded on to the Planning Committeeon September 6th.

Best wishes, Lilly Barnes,

Page 229 or 268 LAKE OF BAYS FOUNDATION P.O. Box 81, Baysville, Ontario PUBlAO www.lakeolbaysheri Eage.ca

tOWNOFHUNTSVILLE

SEP04 2017 September 6, 2017 PI.ANNINC

Ms. Kirstin Maxwell, Planning Manager, Town of Huntsville, Town Hall, 37 Main St East, Huntsville, Ontario, P1H 1A1

Dear Ms. Maxwell, Re: The Proposed Redevelopment of Fairview Island

I am sending this letter to you for your consideration and that of the Mayor and

Councillors. I would like you to include it in your package to be sent to the members of thç Council’s Planning Committee prior to their meeting on 13 September. I also request that it be sent to the Council members not on that Committee. Further, I would like to address the Planning Committee on the 13 September.

The Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation, founded in 1985, has a long tradition of protecting important lands and waters in the Lake of Bays area. Our Vision for the Lake of Bays continues to be: “A community that is engaged in the protection. of its natural, built and cultural legacy for the enjoyment and benefit of current and future generations”. To realize this vision, our mission is to: “Provide the leadership and mobilize the necessary resources to deliver the conservation, stewardship, and education programmes needed to protect the natural, built, and cultural heritage of the Lake of Bays region”.

REDEVELOPMENT OF FAIRVIEWISLAND Background

The proponent has proposed redevelopment of the 21-acre island through a change in the zoning from its current residential zoning (Shoreline Residential Four — SR4), to an ‘Institutional Camp” (CS3) commercial zoning. Ifsuccessful, the proponent willconstruct

Preserving the Lpeijj30c1y26gfor Generations 100% post-consumer recycled stock

the

will

the

large

letters

comes

special

change

friends,

point

and

with

island

types

company

individual

within

There

two

and

are

sit

subsequent

maintenance

the

main Township

property

Bays

and

done

beach

family,

proposal

opposed

its

the

they

for There

emails

Says;

unknown

systems.

building;

central

resolution

possibly

final

guests

and,

Lake

of both

and

being

could

residential

issue.

opening

the

Lake

with because

septic

quality;

this

Huntsville

numerous

the facilities

—

system;

part

spaces;

and

present;

number

corporate

and

the

water

Foundation

change

owners

property

use

rezone

satisfactory

and

not

complex Township

septic

any

wants

Town

and

lake

docks

Township

are

when

the

sleeping

use the

zoning

268

and

the

importantly, islands,

Island

the

Heritage

property

retreat

for

231

lead

have

Agreement;

commercial

dock

request

issues

owners

meetings

with

individual

pollution.

proponent

routine

Page

Bays

will protection

Huntsville,

pending

parking

island,

the

accommodation

light

could

with when

Forest

and,

have

these

Fairview

public

corporate

issues

renters;

Huntsville.

not

and

concerned

the

include:

sky

which

will

change

what

development

habitat;

and

the

Lake

three

Town

future;

central

cottage

zoning

mainland property

night Additionally,

parking

address

units

fish

Managed with

sewage

Town

the

proposed,

The

the

around

cottage the

zoning

one

the

raised

noise;

Huntsville

the

rezoning

development

much

family

lake.

the

these

from

provide

discuss

least

associates,

need

family involved

residential

the

facility;

spread

and

for

issues

between

rezoning

approval.

All

requested

prevention

protection

will

control

treatment

future

Town

separate

Comments

units

Bays

for

the

emerging

Failure

Supervision

Failure

development

commercial business The

current The The

concern, The

The The

storage

request

be:

• •

•

year-round,

redevelopment

Discussions circumstances

proposed Lake

Closing ‘commons’

proponent

room. Issues

cottage boathouses, outstanding

a and Issues sent

also This

employees. forward commercial one requires very clear justification that is specific to the property. This justification is lacking.

Going forward we believe that neighbouring municipalities, when dealing with planning and development project approvals that have impacts on one lake, yet cross municipal boundaries, should be required to collaborate on, and coordinate the review and potential approval of, the proposal on behalf of all the residents of the one lake, in both municipalities.

Judith Mills, President Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation

Page 232 of 268 From: LiiiDavis-Burchat Sent June-26-17 3:19 PM To: Tanya Caileja Cc: Kirstin Maxwell; ‘Marie Poirier’; Geordie Konrad; Carrie Sykes Subject Proposed By-law amendment Z_22_2017_HTE Attachments: 2017-06-26 LOBAletter re By-law amendment Z_222017_HTE.pdf

Dear Ms Calleja;

Please find attached a letter from the Lake of Bays Association outlining concerns and comments we are hearing from our membership about the proposed By-law amendment Z_22_201 7_HTE.

Thank you.

LiliDavis-Burchat Executive Coordinator LAKEOF BAYS ASSOCIATION

loba.ca

1 Page 233 of 268 ASIUCIATEUY

26June 2017

Tanya Calleja Clerk, Town of Huntsville Town HaIl, 37 Main Street East Huntsville ON P1H 1A1 By email: [email protected]

Regarding: Official Plan Amendment (OPA#13) and Zoning By-law Amendment (Z/22/2017/HTE) on Island No. 2, Lake of Bays, Geographic Township of Brunel, Town of Huntsville

Dear Ms. Calleja;

The Lake of Bays Association (LOBA),has agreed to provide the proponents and the Town with a summary of the feedback it has obtained from its members. The following is our summation at this point of the prevailing sentiment of our members.

The Lake of Bays Association, having consulted with its membership, both through a formally scheduled open meeting and through numerous direct member contacts, consistently heard that ad hoc Official Plan and zoning amendments for commercial uses on island properties especially within a predominantly residential waterfront area is not appropriate or considered to be good planning. This is due to the prominence of the island properties to the surrounding waterfront residential and natural land use context, the need for shoreline parking and service areas, and the intensity and character of use that commercial uses require to yield a profit beyond expenses, unlike residential waterfront uses that operate without profit expectation or any financial justification.

It has been noted that land use decisions have to be based on the range and intensity of uses that the land use control instruments (Official Plan, Zoning and Site Plan) allow and not what any particular user intends to voluntarily restrict at any given point in time. It has been noted that use permissions do not relate to particular users but must anticipate change in users or intentions at any moment. Zoning is not user specific.

It is noted that a commercial zoning and official plan amendment for the subject property would have to allow an unfettered right of the owner to market and operate the property to allow full business potential. It could not for instance restrict the marketing of a service to the Konrad’s corporate clients only.

.12

Lake of Bays Association Box S Baysville ON FOB lAO t: 705-767-3395 [email protected] www.Ioba.ca Page 234 of 268 In general consensus view that we have heard from our members is that commercial uses should be avoided on island properties and that they should be directed to the many commercial sites around the lake that are suffering obsolescence with a real need for renewal and re-investment or to mainland areas that are proximate to the settlement nodes. The reasons for this are that the need to service islands with landside parking access and convenient boat services can clearly result in additional impacts both environmental and ambient for the broader community. The provision of emergency services and health services to a more intensive commercial island use is also cited as an issue that requires contemplation.

Alternatively, we have heard from our members that they have lesser concerns should the island be developed and severed for residentiai uses in accordance with the existing zoningalthough it has been noted that the coverage provisions in the existing by-law appear excessive and could use updating. Stringent site plan control should of course be exercised. Alternatives to subdivision and severance such as detached condominium concepts could conceivably be also employed and encouraged by the Town to help ensure the long term maintenance of the managed forest as common element.

Additionally, the general consensus of our members indicates no concern in the event the proponent wishes to develop the lands under a residential zoning umbrella as a residential family compound generally as presented provided the number of units does not exceed the combined frontage requirements of the current by-law. It is understood such a permission would require relief from restrictions that limit the number of structures permitted on a single lot but again, such permissions are not of concern provided sufficiently detailed plans are provided to ensure conventional waterfront setbacks, site specific limits on coverage, Cross Floor Area (GFA)and building height. In the event the proponent and the town wish to pursue the approval of this project as a residential family compound, it may be appropriate for the matter to be deferred in order to allow for the refinement of plans, confirmation of required GFA,footprints, heights and setbacks and of course amplified sewage servicing details. It is understood there are no immediate plans to initiate construction on this project under any scenario.

Under such an alternative (residentially zoned) scenario, our members understand that such residential uses could be used incidentally, as can any cottage on the lake, for the use of the owners friends, family, business associates or employees or to be casually rented to anyone they choose from time to time. Under this residentially zoned scenario a point has been made that no anticipation of profitability or maximization of utility can drive any future required adjustment in land use control instruments (noting that both the District Plan and the Huntsville Plan are properly very sympathetic to the optimization of commercial uses in recognized commercial zones). As a residentially zoned property, such issues as boat docking, shore parking and boat and taxi service would be anticipated to be at a level customarily attributed to any island waterfront residential use.

To be clear, however, our members are concerned that a commercial zoning/use and commercial recognition of the property not be permitted because of the greater intensity, and character of use that may be associated with such uses.

Lake offiaysAssocialion Box 8 Buysville ON POB lAO t: 705-767-3395 [email protected] www.Ioha.ca Page 235 of 268 Finally, it has been noted that there is a difference between ownership and land use. It is noted that it is completely acceptable for private companies, corporations or trusts to own residentially zoned properties provided they are operated within the ambit of the residential use provisions. The LOBA membership also notes that there are no legal non conforming use rights to commercial or quasi commercial uses that are applicable to this property that would warrant any recognition through the establishment of new commercial uses on this island property.

We trust that you will find the foregoing informative and constructive for continuing discussions regarding this property. Thank/- you. Ian Beverley President cc. Kirstin Maxwell, Manager of Planning, Town of Huntsville Marie Poirier, MP Planning Geordie Konrad, The Konrad Group Carrie Sykes, Clerk, Township of Lake of Bays Lake of Bays Association Board of Directors Lake of Bays Association Members (via Newsflash and website)

Lake of Bays Association Box S Baysvillc ON POBlAO t: 705-767-3395 [email protected] www.loba.ca Page 236 of 268 From: Richard Lockie Sent: September-04-17 5:16 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell; Dan Armour Subject: FaiMew Island

Dear Kirstin and Dan;

We are the owners of . We also own 12 acres behind these lakefront lots. We have been owners on since 1983.

We are strongly opposed to the re-zoning and proposed development on Fairview Island. This development will degrade the quality and appeal of the lake and significantly reduce the neighbouring owners’ rights to quiet enjoyment of their properties. The nature of this development will bring many people to the island who have no connection to the lake and or the neighbours rights to quiet enjoyment.

We believe that the proposed plan is deficient in a number of ways that will negatively affect the quality of the lake and is not in compliance with the official plan of the Town or District, Approving a deficient plan such as this that is contrary to the wishes of many long term residents is a dereliction of the responsibilities of the Planning Committee and Town Councillors. The current zoning status together with the Towns strict budding permit process gives the potential purchaser numerous opportunities to improve their property while maintaining the character of the lake.

Please ensure that this letter is part of the record for this issue and circulate it to the Huntsville Town councilors and Planning Committee.

Yours truly,

Richard and Marcia Lockie

Page 237 of 268 From: Laura Mair Sent: September-04-17 6:33 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Planning; Kirstin Maxwell Subject: FaiMew Island

Hello,

After receiving the applicant’s updated materials and attending one of the infomiation sessions I am still strongly against the application and proposed rezoning of Fairview Island.

Twill be attending the upcoming meeting on September the 13th to voice my opposition to this terrible plan that will have a far reaching and detrimental impact to the beauty and serenity of Lake of Bays. Those of us close to Fairview Island will be the most negatively impacted.

Regards, Laura & Ben Mair

1 Page 238 of 268 From: Synergy Search Sent: September-01-17 12:04 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Against the rezoning of Fairview island

Kirsten

We the Clements Family at are against the rezoning of Fairview Island from residential to commercial.

MarilynClements

1 Page 239 of 268 To Huntsville Town Planning Committee. Sept 6th 2017

Regarding Proposed Zoning Change for Fairview Island

As a long time resident and property owner on Lake Of Bays, since 1968, I can safely say never has a proposed development had me more worried about the future of our lake. As you know from the large turn out and vocal opposition at the information meetings I am not alone in my concern about the proposed zoning change and urge the Huntsville Town Council to consider a few important things before making their recommendation.

The Konrad family who have purchased Fairview Island own a large l.T. company with over 200 employees and plan to develop the property for both corporate retreats and as a commercial property to rent out to other companies for corporate retreats. Lake of Bays has historically been a single dwelling family oriented place without any significant commercial development. Thats why we bought here. Thats why we pay taxes here.

Thats what I am seeking to protect in registering my opposition to the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island.

I recognize that every municipality has the right to

Page 240 of 268

the

this

the

boat

Bays

might

not

for

that

rezoned

family

decides

right

that

the

could

that

they

question

force

have

sense

residents

Konrads.

Lake

facility

development.

stopping

the

full

Konrad

concerns

proposal

that

island

of increase

family

just

Huntsville habitat.

the

point

property

the

concerned

over Bays

our

this

makes

island.

property

repeat

may

and

all

application

rezoning?

nothing

forever

not

effects the

268

the

Konrad

Fairview

is natural

family

will

Environmental

access

that

Town

I if

241

inevitable

from

Lake

lake

family

the

meetings

Poirer

the

application

the from

Page

developed

the

and

without

there

the

incorporate

Road

this

proposed

the

whose

that

plans.

development

reselling

suffer

Marie

whether

lake.

complete

however

from

the

times

before

residents

way

will

their

groups

island

little

pollution

from

face

owners

owner

our

affects

property

information

lake

kind

enterprise

that

Nithgrove

opposing

planner

lake

for

the

other

very

large

establish

the

noise

their

family

ask

the

what

three

although

countless

Fairview

any

been

undertake

adverse

anything

community,

town

property

host done

whole

change

fact

would

Konrad next In

I have has

beginning protects have both

least

decide develop

Once can during

our Study

commercial amendment asked

seen As

their

As traffic there to development will negatively affect our property values and those of the entire lake. Is that something that the town of Huntsville is prepared to face in the coming years as other property owners seek to redress the loss of value that this change could potentially incur? Sincerely Signature.jpg Micah Barnes

Page 242 of 268

a 6 September 2017

Mr.Scott Aitchison, Mayor Town of Huntsville 37 Main St E. Huntsville, Ontario, P1H 2H8

Dear Mr. Atchison,

Re: Fairview Island re-zoning proposal: “Institutional Tourist Camp. CS3”

In anticipation of the September13 meeting of the Planning Committee, we wish to voice our continuing concerns about this proposal. After attending 2 of the information sessions and reading the Updated Planning Report, we are of the view that re-zoning of Fairview Island to Institutional Tourist Camp, CS3would have a very negative impact on dozens of families on Lake of Bays for generations to come.

The Updated Planning Report refers to docking faciLitiesfor guests and for staff and services. That said, we believe that if the Konrads (or subsequent owners) were to focus on the commercialism implied by the proposal and permitted by the re-zoning sought the affected part of Lake of Bays could be altered adversely and irrevocably. We note that the Updated Planning Report contains minor adjustments only — such as deletion of reference to commercial plane and helicopter services, however it appears that these elements would not be precluded by the proposal.

Apart from the issues affecting everyone — such as the environmental concerns regarding 29 bathrooms on a 20 acre island; the noise, light and water pollution due to the potential high turnover of constant accommodation, transportation, etc. — we are particularly concerned about the use of the Nithgrove Road access and parking lot, which would include the probable location of mainland waste receptacles.

Our property at . and our next-door neighbour’s property at both abut the 10-car parking lot that serves access to Fairview Island. The applicant claims that this parking lot will be used for residential (family only?) access, but there is no evidence of legal agreements with public marinas for parking and transportation to Fairview for others who would be permitted under C53 zoning.

As noted in the Updated Planning Report, “Letters have been obtained from 4 private marinas to date that commit to providing parking and access to the island.” However, we do not believe that letters provide legal assurance, and they may not apply to future owners of the marinas in any case. Ultimately, it would be much more convenient for a Fairview Island visitor to park at Nithgrove Rd. than anywhere else. The commotion caused by constant activity on Nithgrove Rd.would be completely contrary to the objective of quiet enjoyment sought by the current residents, many of whom have been here for generations.

Page 243 of 268 The purpose of municipal government is to serve the best interests of tile residents at large, not just those of one particular family enterprise. Therefore, we ask that you consider carefully the ramifications of the re-zoning proposal not only for current residents, but also for generations to come, and recommend against its adoption.

Yours very truly,

Peggy Clarke & Ian MacGregor

Page 244 of 268 From: Richard Campbell Sent: September-07-17 2:05 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Application to Rezone Fairview Island Commercial

Hello Kirstin

I’mwriting to you to tell you that I strongly oppose the Application to Rezone Fairview Island from Residential to Commercial and urge you to Vote against this Application.

My family has been on Lake of Bays for 113 years, a span that encompasses 6 generations. My great grandfather bought a lot in 1904 to enjoy the peace and tranquility of Lake of Bays. I am disappointed that an Application has been filed with the Town of Huntsville to allow Fairview Island to be rezoned commercial in the midst of a SR4 residential zone. Ivehemently oppose this Application for the following reasons:

1) This part of Lake of Bays is an exclusively residential area and has been so for many years. A commercial use introduces the likelihood of incompatibility in terms of the level of activity and associated impacts. This fundament change to the Lake would result in numerous negative impacts including noise issues, boat safety issues, sight-line issue, excessive light pollution and a significant increase in boat traffic, to name a few. Not only does the rezoning to commercial come with a host of negative impacts but the fact the property in question is an island, dramatically increases the negative impacts of a commercial operation.

2)1 have been informed by our planner that there are a number of planning arguments that are not adequately addressed or have been applied incorrectly. The Applicants are proposing a combination of family retreat, commercial dwellings and a corporate retreat. There is an inconsistency with the proposed use and the type of rezoning (CS3) that is requested. The proposed OPA and zoning change would not allow for this “hybrid use” as described by the applicants.

3) The proposal is to reduce the minimum shoreline setbacks for five of the buildings to well below the by-law minimum. This is environmentally inappropriate and magnifies the visual and ‘neighbourly’ impact issues.

4) There are numerous technical problems that arise as a result of the hybrid nature of the application — is it a ‘recreational camp’ pursuant to Regulation 568 of the Health Safety and Promotion Act? If so, there are many requirements not addressed by the site plan.

5) The proposed use will have public spaces and may require building construction and fire standards to meet the appropriate higher standards of the Ontario Building Code that are not addressed in the Planning Justification Report (PJR)from the applicant

6) The Applicants held three information sessions to explain what their intended use was and why it was necessary to rezone the Island Commercial. The primary use, as explained by the applicants, is for the private use of their family. If that is correct, why is it necessary to have 26 bedrooms, 28 bathrooms, a dining hall, numerous out structures, ferry docking, float plane docking and a road system to connect the various buildings? The Huntsville zoning by-law makes a distinction between an Institutional Tourist Establishment and a Tourist Establishment. Once again the Applicants and their Planner have erred proposing an Institutional Tourist Establishment when in fact and reality, what they are planning to use the Island for is clearly defined as a Tourist Establishment. Corporate Retreats are found under the

Tourist Establishment definition as defined by the Huntsville by-law, as I am told.

1 Page 245 of 268 7) During the three information sessions, many cottagers voiced their strong opposition to this rezoning on so many levels, errors in interpreting the Official Plans of Muskoka and Huntsville, environmental shortcomings, lack of details on septic, vegetation impact, building size and design issues, ferrying issues, parking issues, boating safety issues, noise issues, construction issues, inconsistency between the verbal presentation by the Applicants and the Planner with the PJR,and inconsistent messaging between the Planner and the Applicants. In the latest PJRfrom the Applicant, page 13, “This update was prepared to reflect and address concerns and issues raised to date through the public consultation process Very few, if any of the concerns or issues raised by concerned cottagers have been addressed by the updated Application or the revised PJRfrom the Applicant.

As you can see by the above points, there are number of fundamental, factual issues that point to this Application being not appropriate nor desirable for Lake of Bays. To that end, I urge you to turn down this application.

Please ensure this email is part of the information package that is circulated to the Planning Committee prior to the September 13th public meeting.

Thank you for your consideration, Richard Campbell

2 Page 246 of 268 the be up to and issues

views, 72017 be the will into being Island) HUNTSVILLE the of traditional While complete and Bays scale not access lake by docks in and

the OF sort of sky boathouses. serious forest most lake. expectations, and aquatic. heritage,

likely SEP enjoyment clutter. ..ELANNINç hugely large Lake two (Z122/2017/HTE) night stand the (Fairview I llmnoiogy toward inevitable and

raises TOWN and 2 Nithgrove of will low-Impact urban 13-acre people, the and very and subtended visual the landscape, all the No. buildings their sale 50 lifestyle, — of very the and which the human a by-laws institutionalized 2008-66P of from (feebly than Huntsville, environmental upon by dock and into buildings Island enjoyment managed myriad prioritizing Huntsville 13.11 and lake, wishes, habitat, proposal, on of for more OP been and Plan, the unacceptable By-Law fish marinas, access eleven of of outcomes for use commercial residents, cancelled Newholm, installation currently and have precepts express Unity incursions amenities Its Bays. the amended residents 21 many clearings Zoning the and public the to articles plant of of island. of 268 — to the resIdents buildings: Centre zoning only and desIgnated from damage of large establishment Bays predictable future lakeside Lake obligatorily been Huntsville enormous of Bays and the from Portage 247 the of long-standing sewage be and FalMew accommodation of not integrity of traffic Island, Department service enshrined contrary existing Muskoka. Heritage cover, tourist are Plan Lake make Page will (OPA#13) the South for has of key Combined and Lake wash large current barge will removed present life massIve zone both the re-zone forest residents environmental sleeping of overarching Plan place the Fairview all Planning Official to of of island to of very boat - and in to of District Island. been owner, the violates from with face Community the institutional and loss riparian by the large of owner Official quality the have report) an of extensive extreme necessarily the by which concerned Manager, in to modifying 21-acre of notwithstanding, use lanes, of application powerboat practice, in the ownership Agreement guided Plan ecology. and Newholm files cottages Councillors, this commercial commitment in cause by many property diminish — docking development no owners, on both Huntsville Planning will one and the of Forest passing private prospect engineering guest Official marine of dominant destruction of 7 exposure common of Translation ethos proposed plane vastly of with new precedent Directors, East 1A1 the resident Amendments the with This Aquaculture development scale and 201 Duke the and people 0P827, the many and of and of Town float 7, undetermined replacement irresponsible Planners vision Maxwell, Bays to years of benefit the P1H 52 by already Managed guests the Street paths be of forest yet and is Green compromised for Clearly, 106 traffic C29C Board shores truly, Riviere-Anderson dangerous long-time as Kirstin proposed Proposed MNR cart the a Main a the enable Lake would Ms. Huntsville Councillors, Re: September 37 Respected in proposed opposition provisions under noise, to camp. irrevocable and, renewed/able. Of (partying) philosophies heliport island Berths Commercial-scale forever golf and insouciant Prolkos As The servicing It unconvincIng island’s considered Rivière-Anderson The set Chair, Yours John From: Dan Shut Sent: August-24-17 3:37 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: Subject: Fairview Island rezoning request scheduled for Sep 23.

Dear Ms. Maxwell:

My wife and I arc residents of and have been rate payers to the Town of Huntsville since 1996. 1personally have been spending a portion of each year at this property since 1951. Our entire family considers this properly, Lake of Bays and the Town of Huntsville something VERY special.

My examination of the documents on the town’s website indicates that little ifanything has changed since the initial request in June of this year, for which there was significant opposition. No where is there any indication how the applicant intends to provide Kydro access to the island. The most direct access would be via Clovelly Point. This Clovelly Point Hydro line crosses my property and I have been told on more than one occasson by Hydro personnel, that the line is 1950’svintage and is at “capacity.” Reconstruction of this line would be disruptive to me and many of my neighbors resulting in loss of forest and vegatation.

Also, in several of the documents, it is mentioned that landside parking for the ‘non-resident component” would be via commercial marinas. My checking with the four closest facilities, Port Cunnington, Pride of Lake of Bays, Haystack Bay, and Baysville. all located in the Town of Lake of Bays, none have “extra” parking spaces. The logical and most direct access is from the Nithgrove Rd. which the applicant has denied will be used. Use of any of these four facilities would add a minimum of 1/2 hour to access the island.

For these and a variety of reasons, most of which have been voiced numerous times by others, we are OPPOSED to the rezoning of Fain’iew Island. We believe that the current zoning status in conjunction with the Town of Huntsville’s comprehensive building permit process gives the potential purchaser numerous opportunities to “improve” their property while maintaining the character of this portion of Lake of Bays which we value so highly.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Please include this correspondence as part of the official record for this Sep 13 rezoning request.

Dan and Audrey Shut

1 Page 248 of 268 Jasmine Last

From: DanShut Sent: September-02-175:33 PM To: KirstinMaxwell Subject; Fairview Island rezoning request scheduled for Sep 13.

Dear Ms. Maxwell.

My wife and I are residents of and have been rate payers to the

Town of Huntsville since 1996. 1personally have been spending a portion of each year at this property since 1951. Our entire family considers this property, Lake of Bays and the Town of Huntsville something VERY special. This is an addendum to my Aug 24 letter to you re: this same subject.

We understand and accept that a purchaser of Fairview Island has every right to improve, expand, or replace the existing residences under the islands current zoning. What we are OPPOSED to is changing the zoning to permit a large number of non-residents to visit the island for short periods of time and the constaiction of associated facilities. This type of visitor feels a strong need to maximize their enjoyment of the facilities during their short visit which we undestand. I am sure this will include the addition ofa number ofwatercraft, otherwise why would the applicant be proposing the constuction of several large docks. Any increase in watercraft use on the north side of the island, where several of the docks are proposed, will result in increased noise, wake, and subsequent waterfront erosion. Note that the separation between Fairview Island and some Clovelly Point residents, is only approximately 200 meters!

For this and a variety of reasons, most of which have been voiced numerous times by others, we are OPPOSED to the rezoning of Fairview Island. We believe that the current zoning status in conjunction with the Town of Huntsville’s comprehensive building permit process gives the potential purchaser numerous opportunities to “improve” their property while maintaining the character of this portion of Lake of Bays which we value so highly.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Please include this correspondence as part of the official record for this Sep 13 rezoning request.

Dan and Audrey Shift

1 Page 249 sf268 SIMON MILES Phone: Fax: E-mail:

Seasonal resident at Lake of Bays, Town of Huntsville

7 September2017

Ms. Kirstin Maxwell Planning Manager Town of Huntsville Town Hall 37 Main St. East

I-Iuntsville P11-I1A1

Dear Ms. Maxwell, Re: Proposed Rezoning of Fairview Island, Lake of Bays, from residential to commercial

1am a seasonal resident of which is in the centre of and about 1/4 mile west of Fairvicw Island.

This letter, which represents an updated version of my letter of 6 June 2017 on the same subject, is being sent to you for your consideration and that of the Mayor and

Councillors. I would be grateffil if you would include it in your package to be sent to the members of the Council’s Planning Committee in preparation for the Committee’s meeting of 13 September. [would also like to request that you forward it to other members of Council not on that committee. As you will see from the covering e-mail for this letter, I am copying several other parties including the councillors and the planner of the Township of Lake of Bays and representatives of Lake of Bays Association and the Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation.

I shall use this letter as the basis of my oral presentation to the Committee on 13 September.

Although this letter represents an update to respond to the updated Justification Report of August 2017, prepared by the proponent’s planner, Ms. Poirier. my position remains the unchanged. I respectffilly request that you do not grant the request for a rezoning of Fairview Island.

The reason my position is the same is because the proposal is essentially the same as that put forward in the April version of the Justification Report. Although there is less reliance in the Justification Report on the argument that Fahwiew Island should revert to its supposed historic use as a camp, that argument, albeit based on a spurious claim, is still implicit in the Justification Report. I shall address this later.

Page 250 cr268 Essentially, my argument for no change in zoning boils down to one of fairness. As I understand it, the role of the Planning Committee, in this instance, is to judge whether this request for a change to the zoning and Lothe Official Plan, if granted, would result in the current members of the local community around Fairview Island feeling that they have been treated fairly.

I cannot see any grounds for such a change in zoning from a residential to a commercial use for an institutional tourist establishment being regarded as fair for the local community around Fait-view.

We have the Huntsville Official Plan to bring a sense of stability to our neighbourhoods. Any change can be made, in fairness, only where there is an agreement, after much consultation with the public, that there has to be change. In such instances, the OfficialPlan provides a clear understanding of the rules to be followed in bringing about that change. Section 13.1t.2, for example, identifies the criteria to be satisfied by a request for a site-specific proposal.

In my view, none of those seven criteria are met by this proposal. In short, the proposed development: is not in conformity with the overall intent of the Official Plan, which in this instance is to retain the residential character of this part of the lake, is not suitable for the site, given the terrain, and given the value of the island as natural habitat currently without pathways for golf carts cutting across it, is not introducing a use compatible with surrounding land uses, is not a development Forwhich there is an obvious need, is not going to enhance the assessed values of surrounding properties, indeed it is likely to lower them, with financial implications for the Town and the taxpayers throughout the Town, is not exhibiting regard for the District olMuskoka Plan, which also calls for development to be compatible with surrounding uses, etc.

Turning to the District of Muskoka Official Plan, there are a number of ways in which the proposal does not satisfy the Plan. Particularly relevant is Section C29.c which indicates that new resorts are encouraged to locate in appropriate locations providing a list of nine issues can be addressed satisfactorily. In my view, none of those nine issues are satisfactorily addressed.

The key point though is that our current Huntsville Official Plan has this entire area around Fairview zoned for residential occupancy. The proposed use is completely incompatible with that residential character of the community. And with the foreseeable evolution of information and communications technologies it is easy to imagine that a commercially zoned Fairview would be become the operational centre for an IT company such as the one owned by the proponent. Whether the transportation to and from the island is solely by boat or also by helicopter and float plane (as I surmise will be requested again in the future), that traffic could well be intensc and impose inordinate noise on neighbours within at least a one-mile radius, and possibly a two-miles radius, in both the Town of Huntsville and the Township of Lake of Bays.

Page 251 of 268 However. there is a more fundamental issue of trust in the planning process to be considered when a change to the Official Plan is contemplated, and it relates to my

point about fairness. I am sure that I speak for all of my neighbours around Fahwiew when I say that we have made major investments in our houses or cottages — both

financial and emotional investments. In my instance, I bought Crown Island when I was very young - before I bought a house. Then, and now, the island represents a very major investment for me. I invested here because I felt I could trust the Town to respect that this lake was to be primarily a lake for local residents and cottagers, and that it would indeed be a place where one could commune with nature. I have accepted that more of the cottagers have decided to live here year round. Fair enough, providing the need to control the nature and growth of the added burden on the natural ecosystems is reflected in the zoning and official plans of both T-Iuntsvilleand the District of Muskoka.

What I cannot accept, simply because it is without justification and so very unfair for all of us in this community around Fain’iew, is that we should have an institutional camp - what amounts to a commercial operation - plonked down in our midst. If granted, this change would amount to a betrayal of the social contract struck between residents and the government of the Town. That strikes me as immoral. To bring this home very clearly, just imagine if the Town decided to allow a factory or an entertainment centre right next to your home.

Moving on from the immorality of any such rezoning, let me turn to examine, in more detail, the lack ofjustification for this project. Thatjustification one expects to find in the Planning Justification Report.

The proponent’s planner, Marie Poirier, tries to persuade you and me with an argument that goes like this.

The island was developed as an institutional camp iii the ]940s. Therezoning to residential was questionable. The Town, which is encouraging tourist developments, should allow this property to re-assume its traditional role.

This argument is based on a spurious claim. For the record, I offer some corrections.

Firstly, the property was not bought from the Crown by the camp. It was sold by the Crown to Mr. Bastedo, of Baysville, around 1911. Indeed, it was known as Bastedo’s Island and used as a summer residence. He had it for many years before it was bought by David Billings Peck, who bought Burnt Island in 1915. Mr. Peck acquired both Fain’iew and the next island, RooUog, for his sons. Cameron Peck was given Fain’iew and used it as a summer residence. Cameron Peek then made the island available for use by the Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship, in the mid-forties. Ownership transferred, through purchase, to the IVCF in 1952, and to IVCF Canada in 1966 (for $1). From 1945 to 1966, when it failed, it was managed by a branch of IVCF and known as Campus in the Woods. In 1972, the island was purchased by its current owners, the Langford family, as a single family seasonal residence.

3 Page 252 of 268

and

the

such

the

such

island

as of

Island

Report

not

this

the

former

legality

find

was

the

for,

using

that

considers

the the

more,

feet

been

every

Report,

get

its satisfy

Huntsville

use

the

attractive

buildings

Bays

and

21-acre

lots

zoning,

one

has

would

that

Fairview

commercial

against

camp

front 7

learn

the

ever

when

it of

residential

only

with

course,

tourist

and

this

sold

1974.

encouraging

fails

that

Justification

200 and

Town

when

of businesses

plans

states

incompatible.

line

what

question

Lake

could

was

(SR4)

Justification

the

Fain’iew

docks

uprising

and

much

house

because

residential

used

clear

the

was

creating

Plan

well

August

the

completely

This

criterion

not

allowed

because

was

not

think

since

open

zoning.

encouraging

especially maximum

all

would

Providing,

public

reason

again,

the

is immediate

may

this

current

the

residential.

Planning

zoning

camp

minimum

not

residents

criteria

for

residential

Official

would

uses.

The

being

that

the

island

redeveloped the

island

that.

camp

did

Tills

then

been

Town

has

flawed,

a Fain’iew

that

Town

calls

other attend

lots

the

have area

the

note

subject

for. though,

268

current

with

has

there

under

The Town’s

the

out

the

representatives

that

earlier.

shoreline

residents

and

(illegally),

call

was us using

253

the

criteria

should

word

use

twenty

surrounding

become

camp, and

the

development

property.

camp

where

did

island

since

proposal

wrong

shown,

IVCF

Indeed,

acres

Plan

makes

mentioned

any

it Page

Yet

lots,

the

unsustainable.

both

transaction,

this

that

the

his

Town,

rezoned.

Certainly,

that

some

island

developed

inviting

2.5

the

not

should

also

refcred

places

tourist

the

with

that

the

nothing

dominant

landing

supporl

not

years

ways. He

Official

proponent

facility.

residential

zoning.

satisfy

this

camp.

argues

havc enough

buildings

the

island

allowed.

that

I although

since

the

could

should

lots,

indeed

plane

argues

waler.

the

Although

May2017

many be

mention

proved

not

also

the want

able plane

There

that

has

District

that,

minimum

Town.

compatibility

some

and

helipad.

admission

compatible

years

what

float

not

island

was

that

evidence

encouraged

the residential

float

the Poirier,

one

camp

For

regarded

being

the

argument

using

would

makes

use

plans

106

than

If or

and

arc

this

holds

construct

cottages.

proponent

island,

and

letter

Ms.

there

the

camp

proponent

plans

lots

the

surely

land

That

suggested

were

pad

given

current

the has

the

legally

years. criterion

the

argument

Plan

camp

official

mention

developments.

lot

a family

public

the

zoning,

again,

footage.

residents

the

time

ever

official

the

his

the

short,

meeting

front

has

Association, residential

helicopter helicopter

first Fowthly, local island In proponent

Langfords under

neighbourhood two a

proposal single shoreline.

meet

In of changes Official

Thus, use developments

Secondly, developments tourist District

that Thirdly,

demonstrated was

And permission

Crown. most, venture. This hardly fits with what is said in the Planning Justification Reports of April and August2017. He must surely realize, that there is nothing in the rezoning that would prevent him, or a future owner, from applying for permission to build a helicopter pad and float plane landing or from renting out the space to others.

In short, the proposal’s justification is replete with false and misleading statements and false assumptions.

In addition to my concerns about the unfairness of the Town approving such a proposal, based on the inability of the proposal to satisfy the official plans of Huntsville and the District, and the absence of any real justification for the project due to the Planning Justification Report’s reliance on false assumptions, I should also like to turn briefly to look at some of the negative environmental and social impacts of the proposed project.

The factors of concern are as follows.

I. Thc scale of the proposed development. This underpins many of the other concerns with regard to potential negative impact. There is an assumption in the Planning Justification Report that, even though there is no legal right to redevelop the buildings used for the camp that was in operation from 1945 to 1966, it is perfectly acceptable to use the number of buildings that once existed in the IVCF camp as a precedent for what should be permitted today. That line of argument certainly smacks of an assumed right to redevelop what existed before. The argument leads to a proposal for a development that will mean 50 or more people being on the island at any one time.

And that, in turn, leads to several potentially negative impacts that I shall touch upon here.

2. Loss of forest cover. The island currently enjoys a Forest Management Agreement for 13 acres of what until now were thought to be 20 acres (but which the latest survey suggests may be 21 acres). This was allowed after deductions for the four cabins and the boathouse and powerhouse. It is important to note that these were the only useable buildings identified, when the current owners were calculating the acreage of forest available for a Forest Management Agreement and to qualify’for tax relief. The proponent maintains that he will retain the Forest Management Agreement and thus protect the forest canopy. He implies that it will be at the level of 14 acres. Clearly, with the greater number of proposed buildings (12 are listed on p.3 and 4) and other structures (such as septic beds), plus extensive pathways to take electrically powered golf carts, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry will not be able to grant a MFA for anything like the same Levelof protection. Beyond the greatly reduced number of acres that could quaLifyfor protection under an FMA, there is the rca! damage done to effective habitat for wildlife with those pathways crisscrossing the island and lit up at night. One needs contiguous habitat for animal species and this is being cut up into tiny parceLs. And animals need darkness. Again, there is an attempt to mislead us. Specifically, this damage to forest cover will not satisfy the requirements of the Huntsville Official Plan sections 8.2.5 and 8.2.7 that speak to the

5 Page 254 of 268 importance of retaining the character of the lake, and sections 8.2.12 and 8.2.14 that speak to the promotion of compatibility with the natural environment.

3. Loss of fish habitat. There are spots where there are type I fish habitat around the island. The proponent argues that the docks are at least 30 metres away from this known habitat. This fails to recognize that the increased boat and seadoo traffic that will be generated by 50 plus people, or even half that number, will create a lot more disturbance. The fact that there are 6 docks of 15 metres length and extensive docks associated with an accessory building (another large cottage), with the facilities building, with two major boat houses (and maybe one day with the helicopter pad and float plane landing), suggests that the fish habitat is being treated without regard for the sustainability of the habitat. This would seem to run counter to Huntsville’s Official Plan sections 8.2.12 and 8.2.14.

4. Water pollution from inadequate sewage treatment and disposal. This has not been addressed adequately. This pollution is likely to threaten water quality. The latest update Letterby Duke engineering, of 21 June 2017, implies that we should just trust theirjudgement, even though the facilities have not been planned yet. This is not good enough.

5. An enormous increase in boat usage from the current level. This is going to have ramifications in a large part of this area of the lake in both the Town of Huntsville and the Township of Lake of Bays. I can imagine that my island will see a further increase of folks who mindlessly want to take “a quick spin around that island over there” without giving a moment’s thought to the disturbance they bring to the life of those on that island over there.

6. The increased noise. The potential for disturbance of our relatively peaceful lake environment over calm water over ¼ mile or much more is very real. Fortunately, the majority of evenings at the lake are not disturbed by neighbours partying. But sound carries far over calm water. On Crown Island I can occasionally here partying on the beach on the other side of Lungmaid and that is with Langmaid between us. On one occasion a graduation party on the north shore of Whitehouse Bay was so loud I could hear the words being sung and that went on till well past midnight. The proponent is planning to have lots of people up at the island at any one time. We can conservatively count sleeping space for 52 and it could well be more. These people are coming for a good time and that means parties. And we have to recognize that most of them will be transients with no commitment to the lake and its community. During the day we can expect more boats (and, possibly, later, helicopters and float planes). It may well become insufferable. There is a noise by-law for the Town but enforcing it on an island is not easy for the Town.

7. Night sky light pollution. Currently we are very fortunate in this part of the lake to enjoy dark night skies. But a commercial enterprise, with its communal buildings and pathways having to be well lit, will necessarily ruin the enjoyment of the night sky. Again, the requirements of HuntsviLle’sOfficial Plan section 8.2.7, which aims to

6 Page 255 of 268 protect the local character of the lake and retain views and panoramas (even at night), will not be satisfied.

8. The introduction of visual clutter. The proposal calls for the introduction, on the

shoreline, of six very long docks (of I5mj, a second large boat house, and a service dock, in addition to existing docks and a large boat house. They do not appear to be in keeping with Huntsville’s Official Plan section 8.2.10 that calls for limited impact on the natural and aesthetic environment.

In planning terms, these potential impacts have to bc examined and the rcquircrnents of the official plans of both 1-luntsvilleand the District have to be met. In my view, the requirements of the Huntsville and District of Muskoka official plans are not being met with the current proposal.

Finally, I wish to touch upon access to the island. The current owners use a private

access point they own on Nithgrove Road in the Township of Lake of Bays. I understand this has parking for two cars. They also own and use another nearby back lot on Nithgrove Road for parking for up to 10 cars. There are two issues relating to access raised by the proposal: access during construction, and access for use of the island if developed as proposed. The August version of the Planning Justification Report states (on p.12) that access and parking for, and access by the transitory’public will not be permitted. But that does nothing to reassure neighbours of the Nithgrove lot that the flow of people as private guests will be manageable. There is a specific reference to the Nithgrove lot on p.4 and there it is stated that only residential users will embark from this point. But this leaves wide open how one determines whether a specific visitor is arriving as a guest of a resident or as a commercial guest. This is not something that T-luntsvillcis likely to be able to police.

My particular concern with respect to access is with the use of the Huntsville government dock on South Portage Road. It is just west of where I have my boat house and mainland private access point. That dock is well used by local residents for swimming and boating. Unfortunately, it is also being used by barges for construction on properties that are more easily accessed by water. We do not need more barge traffic there. For on-going use I understand Huntsville does not allow overnight parking.

However, I am equally concerned that the government docks and other access points in other pans of the lake near Fairview will also be under greater pressure if the Fairview development were to proceed as proposed. In short, the question of access needs more attention by both the Town of Huntsville and the Township of Lake of Bays.

Thus, for all these reasons, I respcctftilly request that the applications for a rezoning and an amendment to Huntsville’s Official Plan be denied.

Yours sincerely,

(Signed)

7 Page 256 cr268 Simon Miles cc. Town of Huntsville Mayor and Councillors through Kirstin Maxwell Township of Lake of Bays Mayor Bob Young, and Councillors Baker, Lacroix, Tapley, Ross, Peppard and Glover Township of Lake of Bays Planner, Melissa Markham Lake of Bays Association President Ian Beverley, and Co-chairs of the Planning & Development Committee, BatTy Morrison and Brian Simpson Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation President Judith Mills

8 Page 257 of 268 From: Sharon Solomon Sent: September-06-17 12:26 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell; Nancy,Alcock®huntsville.ca; [email protected]; Dan.Armour@huntsvillaca; [email protected]; Karen Teniano; Jonath an.Wie be® huntsville.ca Cc: BillTapscott Subject: Fairview Island Re-Zoning

Dear Members of the Huntsville Planning Committee:

We are 30-4-yearresident cottage owners at . When we look out from our windows and porches, we see Fairview Island.

We are adamant in our opposition to the rezoning of Fairview Island from residential to commercial.

We have attended the information sessions outlining the proposed rezoning to a year-round commercial corporate retreat supporting approximately 50 guests at one time plus the rental of the entire island facilities. In conversation with the Konrads, they have asserted that their family left one of the other Muskoka lakes where they grew up due to the increased noise, boat traffic, business and over all changes. Vet, they seem not to realize that that is exactly our concern with respect to their proposed rezoning and development to a commercial corporate retreat. A development of the scale proposed will bring increased boat traffic, noise and night time light from the island. We understand that the Konrad Group has built and run several successful businesses. It would seem unlikely that business people would make a multi-multi-million dollar investment expenditure without a business plan outlining the proposed use and revenue from the corporate retreat. Yet they insist it will be rented infrequently to people they know. Something does not ring true. Building out and maintaining an island as per their proposal is a significant investment. Lake of Bays is a gem which already has Bigwin Island Golf Course which has new rental accommodations to be constructed, plus several resorts. The Environmental Impact of the Konrad development is yet to be assessed and extremely important. We and others opposed to this rezoning and development have made significant financial investments in our cottages, pay significant annual taxes and contribute to the community. As an example, this year’s Summer Party held by the Trout and Grouse Cub at Bigwin raised funds in support of the Huntsville Hospital. We, personally, would use the hospital in Bracebridge, but it was a worthy cause for us to make a contribution.

We would be delighted to have the Konrads and their families as neighbours but not as a commercial enterprise.

With Respect,

Sharon Solomon and William Tapscott

1 Page 258 or268 Arkn and Emily Sternberg

September 7, 2017

TO: Huntsville Mayor and Town Council MCmbCLS AND TO: Kirstin Maxwell

Dear Mayor, Town Council Members and Ms. Maxwell:

Re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law — Island No. 2 (Fairview Island) in Lake of Bays (September 13 Planning Committee Meeting)

I am writing on my and my wile’s behalf regarding the above application, which we understand is scheduled to be considered at the Town’s upcoming planning committee meeting on September 13, 2017. My wife and I are part of the group of families that are being represented by l-laroldBlston (counsel) and Robert Lehman (planner), who will be making submissions and submitting a planning report. We also wanted to send this letter to directly register our strong objection to this application. We have concerns about the application and the impacts it would have. We request that the Town deny the application.

My wife and I own a cottage on Lake of Bays and will be directly affected by this proposed development on Fairview Island. Our cottage is . We are directly south of the Island — from our cottage and dock we look straight at Fainiew (at the south side of it). We have a number of concerns about the proposed development set out in the application and the significant negative impact it would have on the intensity of use in the area and on the residential character of the area that we feel should be preserved.

The application seeks to thndamentally change the zoning and use of the Island--it seeks to amend the official plan and to amend the zoning bylaw to penit redevelopment of the Island as an “institutional tourist establishment” — i.e. a commercial zoning — compared to its current and longstanding zoning and use as solely a residential Island. For the past 50 or so years, and also originally in its history of being inhabited, Faiiwiew Island has been a single family residential use (a single family compound). The applicant proposes to construct many significant buildings on the Island and seeks to change the use of it to include a corporate retreat and to also rent out the Island from time to time, we understand.

We, and many neighbours to whom we have spoken, are opposed to the Island being rezoned commercial, rather than residential. The intensity of use and activities that would be permitted under a commercial zoning would be very different than a residential use and would dramatically change this particular area of the lake. More commercial development is not what is needed or appropriate in this spot on the lake, particularly since we already have Bigwin Island — a big commercial development, which includes additional development that is now occurring on it — in close proximity to Fairview Island. Bigwin is just to the East of Fain’iew. More commercial development in this area of the lake would change the character of this area and negatively impact in a significant way the landscape and our and our neighbours’ quiet use and enjoyment

Page 259 of 268 -7-

of our properties. We understand there are many policy and other planning arguments as to why the requested change to a commercial zoning is not appropriate from a planning perspective, which will be addressed by our counsel and by Mr. Lehman.

In addition, my wife and my many concerns include the following:

I. concerns about the visual change in landscape that vi IIchange the nature of this area — the applicant proposes to build a massive main dwelling (approximately 12,000 square feet, including deck and assuming it is 2 storeys), a very large accessory building, a main boathouse, a main dock, plus 6 additional cottages (which they call “cabins”) and other facilities — assuming the cottages and other dwelling buildings are likely to be two storeys, which is what the applicants have repeatedly indicated at Town Hall meetings, the interior living space square footage of those dwellings would total 32,914 square foot, not including all the decks, docks, large boathouse and large “service building” — this represents a very large and different development compared to what is now on the Island and is currently in use; 2. concerns about the significant noise from their intended use, which would be much greater than if the Island remained zoned residential; noise both from regularly transporting large groups of people to and from the Island — their planning justification report indicates that they propose to use a variety of shuttle services to transport people including potentially by caravan float plane — and noise from the activities on the Island (groups of transient guests would be coming to the Island) during the daytime and at night: 3. concerns about light pollution; and 4. concerns about tree removal that would be necessary to construct all of the buildings/facilities they propose, and also other potential environmental concerns associated with their development, including potential negative impacts on the lake habitat itself.

In conclusion I must say that we are normally reluctant to get involved in these types of matters but have felt compelled to get involved with this one because we truly feel that, if approved, it would likely have a very negative and permanent impact on this area of the lake, the intensity of use and character of it, and on the use and enjoyment of all of us residents that will be directly affected and harmed by it (and will have to live with its impacts including all the inevitable disruptive noise of its activities). We sincerely hope the council members will take all of these concerns, and the many concerns being raised by other residents, seriously. We respectftlly ask that the Town councilors deny this application and maintain Fairview Island under residential zoning.

Yo truly,

Arlen ternberg c: Lake of Bays Association Township of Lake of Bays

Page 260 of 268 From: BillTapscott Sent September-06-17 12:45 PM To: Sharon Solomon; Kirstin Maxwell; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Karen Terziano; [email protected] Subject: RE:Fairview Island Re-Zoning

Importance: High

Thanks for sending this note Sharon.

Iwould like to add a concern I have regarding safety. Under the Institutional Tourist Designation we can expect a steady stream of newcomers to the lake arriving at all ours of the day and night and under diverse weather conditions. The Konrad/Poirier Plan strikes me as inadequate in planning for transportation demand. As stated they will rely on local marinas primarily and private boats. The closet marina is at Port Cunnington and they will need to cross a very wide and open part of the lake which is at the leeward end of the north wind. It can be very rough, I know from experience and I am concerned that there will be inadequate policing of boat drivers for whether operators are properly licensed and equipped. Isee the commercial zoning of the island unsuitable. I understand the Konrads have purchased the island and hence will develop as they see fit under the residential zoning. Ithink this is a far better usage than commercial.

Thank you,

William Tapscott

From: Sharon Solomon Sent: September 6, 2017 12:26 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: BillTapscott Subject: Fairview Island Re-Zoning

Dear Members of the Huntsville Planning Committee:

We are 30+year resident cottage owners at . When we look out from our windows and porches, we see Fairview Island.

We are adamant in our opposition to the rezoning of Fairview Island from residential to commercial.

1 Page 261 of 268 Lake of Bays is a gem which already has Bigwin Island Golf Course which has new rental accommodations to be constructed, plus several resorts. The Environmental Impact of the Konrad development is yet to be assessed and extremely important. We and others opposed to this rezoning and development have made significant financial investments in our cottages, pay significant annual taxes and contribute to the community. As an example, this year’s Summer Party held by the Trout and Grouse Cub at Bigwin raised funds in support of the Huntsville Hospital. We, personally, would use the hospital in Bracebridge, but it was a worthy cause for us to make a contribution.

We would be delighted to have the Konrads and their families as neighbours but not as a commercial enterprise.

With Respect,

Sharon Solomon and William Tapscott

2 Page 262 of 268 From: TracyCampbell Sent: September-06-17 10:44 AM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject Re-Zoning of Fairview Island

Dear Ms. Maxwell:

I’m writing because I object to the re-zoning of Fairwiew Island on Lake of l3ays. I fail to understand the justification fora property to be zoned commercial that is in the middle oa residential area.

I am a full time resident on Lake of Bays which is in Lake of Bays Township yet I live across from Fairview Island which is in Huntsville Township. Lake of Bays Township does not want to get involved and I fear that this area of Fluntsville Township is not important.

I sincerely hope that the Huntsville Township Planning Committee takes into consideration the many, many families that will be impacted by this huge decision and recognizes the responsibility for all that we love about lire on Lake of Bays that could affect generations and generations to come.

Please do not recommend that the planning committee accept this application as thcre should be no choice but to reject the application for Fairview Island to be re-zoned.

—TracyCampbell

1 Page 263 of 268 From: VickyWeaver Sent September-04-17 12:51 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview Island - OPPOSED

Kirstin Maxwell,

After receiving the applicant’s updated materials and attending the July 31, 2017 meeting at the Huntsville Holiday Inn and hearing this pre-development of Fairview Island that I am still strongly opposed to this application and proposed re zoning of Fairview Island. I am worried about if the zoning is changed on Fairview Island the future tone of the island is not contained or controlled. This opens too liberally commercial endeavours which is uncontrolled boating, to and from the island, noise, this island is almost the centre of Lake of Bays, so it is like being on a megaphone. The location of this island is effecting this opposition as I said it is the middle of the central part of Lake of Bays. Too many new docks, new buildings which is more rooms and bed space. My Lake of Bays property is situated so that I constantly look at this island as my family has since 1939 on the Lake of Bays. I would like this email to be part of the package that is being forwarded on to the Planning Committee on September 6.

Thanking you in advance for your assistance.

Most sincerely, Victoria C. Weaver,

Page 264 of 268 F-- From: Dan Armour Sent September-05-17 7:41 AM To: VickyWeaver Cc: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Re: Fairview Island - OPPOSED

Thank you for the email, I have forward the email to planning so it is included in the agenda.

Daniel Armour

On Sep 4, 2017, at 12:59, Vicky Weaver wrote:

Dan Armour, (Ward 2 Councillor for Fairview Island)

After receiving the applicant’s updated materials and attending the July 31, 2017 meeting at the

Huntsville Holiday Inn and hearing this pre-development of Fairview Island that I am still strongly

opposed to this application and proposed re-zoning of Fairview Island. I am worried about if the zoning is changed on Fairview Island the future tone of the island is not contained or controlled. This opens too liberally commercial endeavours which is uncontrolled boating, to and from the island, noise, this island is almost the centre of Lake of Bays, so it is like being on a megaphone. The location of this island is

effecting this opposition as I said it is the middle of the central part of Lake of Bays. Too many new docks, new buildings which is more rooms and bed space. My Lake of Bays property is situated so that

I constantly look at this island as my family has since 1939 on the Wahawin South Shore of Lake of

Bays. Iwould like this email to be part of the package that is being forwarded on to the Planning Committee on September 6.

Thanking you in advance for your assistance.

Most sincerely, Victoria C. Weaver,

1 Page 265 of 268 From: Crystal Best-Sararas Sent September-05-17 8:44 AM To: Bob Stone; Brian Thompson; Dan Armour Det Schumacher; Jason FitzGerald; Jonathan Wiebe; Karin Terziano; Nancy Alcock; Scott Aitchison Cc: Kirstin Maxwell; Jasmine Last; Tanya Calleja Subject: FW:Fairview Island Lake of Bays

Good morning,

Please see the correspondence below.

With thanks,

Best-Sararas Deputy Clerk Crystal I (705) 789-1751 ext 2258 www. huntsville. ca

Original Message From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sent: september-04-17 7:50 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Fairview Island Lake of Bays

Huntsville Councillors,

I am a full time resident of Lake of Bays, and my family has owned this property since 1939. After receiving the application updated materials & attending the July 31, 2017 predevelopment hearing on Fairview island I am still strongly opposed to having it rezoned as commercial. This island is in the middle of Lake of Bays so any noise will effect the largest population of cottagers. Ifthe zoning is changed to commercial this allows to much freedom of expansion and change. Nature will be impacted by the increase in water, air and human traffic. This is a small island and large commercial development will impact the flora and fauna of the lake.

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetvourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Victoria C. Weave through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

1 Page 266 of 268 I

From: Barry Campbell Sent: September-08-17 2:28 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: please include this email with package being forwarded to the Huntsville Planning Committee re proposed re-zoning of Faiwiew island

REProposed Re-Zoning Of Fairview Island

I live at directly opposite Fairview Island. We will be impacted by development of the Fairview Island and urge the Planning Committee to take special care in its deliberations to discern the true intentions of the proponents and the impacts on residents all over the area.

I have attended the public information meetings, and reviewed all the materials put forward in support of the re-zoning

application. The inconsistencies between the proponents stated goals ( mainly a family retreat and for a few clients and employees, they have said repeatedly at information meetings) and the zoning being sought, is blindly obvious. The number and scale of buildings being proposed should give the Planning Committee pause. “Tourist commercial” will be exactly that. Once in place, this zoning will open up Fairview island to all manner of commercial development incompatible with the over-whelming residential nature of the Lake.

Respectfully submitted.

Page 267 or 268

Tall

Fax

Cell

Pride

Location

Bob

Best

initiatives

potential

Fairview

all

supplies

commercial

n—rifle

including

commercial

understanding

applications

This

Dear

Re:

Sunday

Free

705-805-9333

705.826-0323

areas

have

fully

Regards

bbsonpHdernarinegroup.com

believe

Gibson

letter

Lake

Kirstin,

—

800

Manager

support

CrCLI

Falrview

customers 2

Island

are

that

May

marinas.

boat

991

our

the

marinas

institutional

critical

submitted

will

Bays

3006

property.

that

business

dock

recapitatizaUon

advise

this

2017

help •-‘—

Island

Marine

from

the

planning

Ext.

for

slips

with

the

e.v

that

proposed

docking,

use,

130

June

—

marine

future allow

and

the

Lake

contribute

our

also

which

application,

—

growth

Toll

marina

for

September

mainland

parking,

planning

have

properties

our

the

Free:

ride

Bays,

would

and

industry. re-development

has

the

Page

1•SO0

the

storage,

Huntsville

parking rely

sustainability

changes

ability

been

access

268

(such

well

‘El

our

‘ro

made

-3005

268

the

upper spaces

fuel,

Proudly

offer requirements are

any

can

support

Fairview

aware

maintenance,

essentially

other

yard

confirm

the

that

our

boal

Web:

c,o

Serving

Fairview

services

responsible

could

industry.

stand)

valet

the

r--..

pñrQn1;;InqroupoIn

that

Zoning

this

our

and

allow

Ontario

shuttle

that

Island

dedicated

development.

many

marina

car

depend

development

for

and

service

Property.

park

the

Boaters

local

OPA

has

return

service on

businesses,

the

and

capacity

Currently

other

our

50 in r Date: February 23,2018 MunicIpal Sales Listing Page: I County/Municipality: 4442 Municipalily: HUNTSVILLE TOWN Roll Number/Location Previous Owner(s) New Owner(s) Mailing Address Sale 010 008 01100 WILSON GEORGE DEREK ESTATE WILSON GEORGE Di W TRUSTEE 32 KING CRES Dale: 20171222 22 WEST RD WILSON DARRYL JOHN TRUSTEE HUNTSVILLE ON PIH IX6 - PLAN 24 PT LOTS 9 AND 10 RCP Instrument. MTI93965 547 PT LOT 14 RP 35R6576 PART 3 RP 35R7334 PARTS 3 4 Amount: SI AND 7 010 008 01100 WILSON GEORGE Di W WILSON CHRISTOPHER 90 HOWIAND DR Date: 20171222 22 WEST RD WILSON DARRYL JOHN HUNTSVILLE ON PIH 2P9 PLAN 24 PT LOTS 9 AND IC RCP Instrument. MT1 93966 547 PT LOT 14 RP 35R6576 PART 3 RP 35R7334 PARTS 34 Amount: Si AND 7 010 015 00500 1918321 ONTARIO INC BMRS LORI ELIZABETH 286 LAKELAND CRES Date: 20180212 PLAN 22 LOT 259 PT LOT 299 BEAVERTON ON LOK lAD Instrument: MT195397 AND RP 35R12692 PART3 Amount: $182,000 020 004 00910 PIMENTEL EDMuNDO PIMENTEL CARMEN 36 GOODWIN DR Date: 20180209 36 GOODWIN DR PIMENTEL CARMEN HUNTSVILLE ON P1H 2R3 CON 1 LOT 10 PLAN M536 LOT Instrument MTl95378 32 Amount Si 020 05500 008 ROWE RONALD ROWE RONALD 33 GOULDIE ST Date: 33 GOULDIE ST ROWE OLIVE PATRICIA 20180215 HUNTSVILLE ON PiN 1M4 - CON 2 LOT 12 PLAN 9 LOT 21 Instrument- MT195548 LOT 22 Amount: $1 020 009 06001 GARNER DEVON ELISSE SAVOLDI ALESSANDRO 37 EARLS RD Date: 37 EARLS RD MARKLE DARREN WILLIAM 20180215 HUNTSVILLE ON P1H 1C7 - CON 2 LOT IS PLAN 526 E PT Instrument. MT195504 LOT 45 Amount: $150,000 020 014 11611 COLLINS ANDREW KEITH BAYNE GLEN 118 CHAFFEY TOWNSHIP RD Date: 20171201 118 CHAFFEYTOWNSHIP RD POSNIKOFF DONNA HUNTSVILLE ON PIH 1CB - RCP 535 PT LOT 58 RP Instrument- MT193065 35R25202 PART 7 Amount: $371006 020 015 02400 CRANSTON DOREEN D!GNMM3 OVENDEN RONALD JAMES TRUSTEE Ii GLEN ACRES 11 GLEN ACRES RD RD Date: 20180213 HUNTSVILLE ON P1H iNS - CON 4 PT LOT 9 Instrument, MT195440 Amount: $260,000 020 015 02400 DINGMAN ALVIN CRANSTON DOREEN 0 TRUSTEE 1159 COUNTY 22 RD Date: II GLEN ACRES RD DINGMAN WENDY 20150205 GRAFION ON KOK 2GD - CON 4 PT LOT 9 Instrument- MT195222 Amount: SI 020 015 10100 WARE OWEN BAILEY WARE OWEN BAILEY 65 SKYHILLS RD RD Dale: 2D171222 SKYHILLS WARE SUSAN JANET HUNTSVILLE ON P1H 2N5 CHAFFEY CON 5 PT LOTS 7 AND Instrument: MT194014 8 Amount: SI Date: February 23,2018 Municipal Sales Listing Page: 2

County/Municipality: 4442 Municipality: HUNTSVILLE TOWN Roll Number (Location Previous Owner(s) New Owner(s) Mailing Address Sale 020 015 10101 WARE OWEN WARE OWEN 65 SKYHILLS RD Date: 20171222

53 SKYHILLS RD WARE SUSAN JANET HUNTSVILLE ON P1H 2N5 — CHAFFEY CONS PT LOTS RP Instrument: .I 194014 35R25417 PART 7 Amount: Si 020 016 01230 DENVER DAVID LLEWELVN DEUYER CHRISTINE 9 HOMESTEAD LANE Dale: 20180215

9 HOMESTEAD LANE DENVER CHRISTINE HUNTSVILLE ON P1H 2N8 — - PLAN 35M732 LOT 4 Instrument. .i I lgnSnn Amount: $2 020 016 01506 RAWILLE DEVELOPMENTS FIDLER KRISTEN LEAH KATE 12 BRAESIDE CRES Dale: 20180215

12 BRAESIDE CRES (SETTLERS) INC HUNTSVILLE ON P1H OCS — - PLAN 35M740 LOT 6 Instrument: Mi l9n51B Amounl: 5386.927 020 016 01559 RAWILLE DEVELOPMENTS COPAND DONNA 47 SELKIRK DR Date: 20180201 47 SELKIRK DR (SETTLERS) INC COPELAND DONALD HUNTSVILLE ON P1H 0C5 PLAN 35M740 LOT 59 Instrument: MT1 95146 Amount: $542,078 020 018 07501 OLDHAM JASON ANDREW IZAU OLDHAM JASON ANDREW IZATT 571 FOWLERS RD Date: 20180215 571 FOWLERS RD MAThEWS JASMINE ELIZABETH OLDHA.4 JASMINE ELIZABETH HUNTSVILLE ON PIN 2N5 CON 7 PT LOT 10 RP 35R14295 Instrument. MT195540 PART 1 Amount: SI 020 018 08108 KOHL JORDAN HILTON PAUL DOUGLAS 184 FOWLERS RD Date: 20180220 184 FOWLERS RD HILTON JULIE ANN HUNTSVILLE ON P1H 2N5 CON 7 PT LOT 14 RP 35R14138 Instrument. MTI95o16 PART 8 Amount: 5420.000 020 021 06900 PUCE NIKOLA EARL EARL GLEN 106 OLD CENTURIAN TRAIL Dale: 20180214

569 RIPPLE LANE PUCE BLAZENKA ANTOSIN( JOANNA HUNTSVILLE ON P1H 2N5 - - CON 12 LOTS PUCE DENNY Instrument. MT1954B PUCE JERRY Amount: $180000 030 007 03707 2496680 ONTARIO LIMITED REID JAMES MURRAY SUITE 4006 Date: 20160919

ETWELL RD LOVEr-REID PATRICIA ANNE 183 WELLINGTON ST W . - STISTED CON 3 PT LOTS 29 AND TORONTO ON M5V OAI Instrument. MT17335 30 PP 35R25122 PART 3 Amount: $550000 040 005 03906 HOBBS PHILLIPS ESTHER EBERT STEPHANIE VICTORIA 37 OVERSXATE CRT Date: 20171207 970 DEER LAKE RD ETOBICOKEON M9V4X1 STEPHENSON CON I PT LOT 25 Instrument.. MTL3217 AND RP RD723 PART 1 Amount: $127,500 040 008 01410 MCLEAN ROBERT HAROLD MCLEAN LAURIE ANN 40 HUGHES RD Date: 20180201 4OHUGHESRD RP 35R16368 PORT SVDNEV ON PUB ILO Instrumenl: MT195119 PART 2 Amount: Si Date: February 232018 Municipal Sales Listing Page: 3 County)Municipality: 4442 Municipality: HUNTSVILLE TOWN Roll Number iLocatlon Previous Owner(s) New Owner(s) Mailing Address Sale 040 008 01410 WILSON LAURIE ANN MCLEAN ROBERT HAROLD 40 HUGHES 40 HUGHES RD Dale: 20180201 RD MCLEAN LAURIE ANN RR 2 CON 3 PT LOT 26 RP 35R16368 InskumenL- PART 2 PORT SYDNEY ON Poe ILO .ATt95I 18 Amounl: Si 040 OIl 056D0 EADES TANYA CRYSTAL UPPAL ROCKY GURPREET 201 HIGHWAY 141 1880 FEATHERSTON DR Dale: 201 80215 MISSISSAUGA ON L5L 2T1 CONS PT LOT 16 RP 35R1 1316 Inslwmenl. PART 2 MT1 95539 Asnuunl: $255000 040011 10402 EWE ANDREW RUTHERFORD LOREE SARAH 64 CLARKE CRES ROBIN 84 CLARKE CRES Dale 20180220 FYFE NANCY JEAN LOREE DONALD GRANT I CONE LOT 23 PLAN M588 LOT 2 RR PORT SYDNEY ON P08 1 LO Inslnjment MT195617 Asnounl: 5405000 04001200507 5CHIJMACHEROEREV SCHUMACHERDEREV 112 CLARKES LANE 112CLARKESLN Dale: 20180214 SCHUMACHER JANICE CAROL HUNTSVILLE ON POB HAD CON 7 LOT 15 PLAN 35M 570 Inslniment: LOT 13 MT195494 Amounl: 52 040 019 01400 TRUSTEES OF THE MADILL MADILL CHURCH PRESERVATION 254 OLD MUSKOKA RD C1O LYNDA MCLEOD Dale: 20180201 CHURCH SOCIETY 48 HOMESTEAD LANE STEPHENSON CON 13 PT LOT 33 ln5tnjmenl: RP 35R23361 PART 3 HUNTSVILLE ON P1H 2N8 MT195142 Amounl: $2 060 005 04304 CALLAGHAN COLIN JAMES BARKER KEVIN ANDREW 127 CONC 4 & 5 RD E 127 CONCESSION 4 & SE Date: 20180201 HUffSVILLE ON PIH 2J3 - CON 4 PT LOT 17 RP 35R12331 Inelniment. PART 1 MT195143 Amounl: $260,000 060 009 08705 HANCOCK JEFFREY HANCOCK DANA LEE 3545 CONCESSION 618 BRUNEL RD HANCOCK RD 11 Dale: 20180205 BRIAN RAMARA ON L3V OLE BRUNEL CON 12 PT LOT 14 RP Inslrumenl: 35R222U3 PART 2 MT195233 Amounl: 582,500 060 010 06620 COLLEY ROBERT CHARLES FYFE NANCY JEAN 622 GRYFFIN LODGE RD 622 GRYFFIN LODGE RD Dale: 20180215 FYFE ANDREW RUTHERFORD UrIERSON ON PUB 11.10 CON U LOT I PLAN M492 LOT Instrumen,: tO MT195515 AmDunl: 5475,000 Total: 28 L I- Attachment #5: Comments Received

From: BillTapscott Sent May-02-17 5:02 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc Sharon Solomon Subject: Re Fairview Island Attachments: Letter re Amended Plan proposal re Fairveiw Island, May 2 2017.pdf

Dear Kirstin:

I have heard only yesterday of the proposed plans for Fairview Island and have written this letter attached. My wife,

Sharon Solomon (cc:d) and I request you please forward this letter to the attention of the people accountable i.e. the Mayor and his council. Thank you. BillTapscott.

1 Page 17 of 268 _____

May?, 2017

To the Mayor of Huntsville To the Town Council

BA, do Kirstin Mrncwell, MCIP, APP I Manager of Planning Town of Huntsville Town Hall Main Street I37 East (705) 789-1751 ext 2351 1-aas-6g6-4255 ext 2351 I www.huntsuille.ca

Re: Application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law — Island No. 2 (Fairview Island) in Lake of Bays

On behalf of my wife and me, Iam writing regarding the above application, and notice of a public meeting of the Planning Committee of Council scheduled for May 10, 2017. The application, which Ilearned of yesterday, seeks to amend the OfficialPlan and Zoning By-lawto permit redevelopment of Fairview Island as an “institutional tourist establishment” (compared to its current single family residential use). We are residents on the Lakeat - and in fact our property faces Fairview Island - and as such we will be directly affected by this proposed development. I am writing to request that the public meeting scheduled for May 10 be deferred to a later date, to allow us the time to learn about the proposal and have the opportunity to consider the impact to our local environment.

Just based on the limited information we’ve been able to source through neighbours, we have serious concerns. It seems to be a very significant change for the island — to have been for the last 50 years a compound for a single extended family; to now becoming effectively a resort for rent. That said we have not had time to consider the materials we do have or gather the information needed for us to develop a point of view and consider our initial concerns. We intend to contact our ratepayer’s association and discuss with our neighbours once we have the details about the proposed amendment and zoning by-law changes. We request that you re schedule and provide notice for the maximum permitted under your by-laws.

Thank you for your consideration of this. I look forward to your response.

Sincerely yours, w.

William K.Tapscott & Sharon A.Solomon

Page 18 of 268 From: Sent: May-03-17 1:22 AM To: KirstinMaxwell Subject FairviewIslandRezoningApplication:May10th,2017

Hello Kirstin. Could you please forward my email to the Mayor and Members of the Town Council prior to the submission deadline. Thank you very much. Richard Campbell

To: The Mayor and Town Council Members

Tam writing on behalf of my family regarding the above application, about which the Town issued on April 27, 2017 a notice of a public meeting of the Planning Committee of Council scheduled for May 10, 2017. The application seeks to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit redevelopment ofFairview Island as an “institutional tourist establishment” (compared to its current single family residential use). My family has been on ,Lake of Bays, for 113 years and our home directly faces Fairview Island and as such we viIl be directly affected by this proposed devcloprncnt. I am writintz to request that the public meeting scheduled for May 10 to consider this application be deferred to a later date. to allow proper notice to be &ven to thc affected residents and a proper opportunity for them to consult and respond to the application.

We therefore respectfully ask that the Town issue a further and proper notice to the public in respect of this application, providing additional information regarding what is being proposed and steps that must be taken to preserve appeal rights, and that the public meeting to consider this application be deferred to a date that is at least 20 days — and preferably at least 30 days — from the date of the new notice. am very concerned that this substantive change has not been allowed adequate notice to allow all those affected parties to make thorough representations. Our family and our Glenmount Road I Wahawin Road neighbours, located on the south shore of Lake of Bays in the Township Lake of Bays, were not given any notice of this application yet we are equally affected, if not more than those receiving notification, as the orientation of our residences / docks directly face the “front” section of Fairview Island and look out upon the proposed navigation route from the Nithgrove Road parking lot to Fairview Island. We need time not only to understand the proposal but also to be able to consult with a planner and others, and to prepare responding submissions. It’s of course important that the Town ensures a fair process which allows time for meaningful participation by the residents.

Based upon the limited information I have received, I am concerned the proposed application very much understates the environmental and sociological impairment that would occur with a project of this magnitude. While I can appreciate the postiveness that the planner Ms. Poirier is exuding, I have a number of concerns that appear absent or minimized within this application such as the density of the island inhabitants, the disruption to the island vegetation, the water impact of multiple docks and a concrete ramp, the increase in noise from multiple shuttles coming and going, service boats coming and going, a proposed helicopter pad, to name a few. lam also concerned with the true medium and long term use of the property if the potential buyer no longer wants to have an “institutional camp”. Again, we need to understand additional details regarding the

1 Page 19 of 268 proposal and to consult with others in order to further assess the application and its various impacts. We can then be in a position to provide submissions to the Town in response to it.

We look forward to the Town’s confirmation that, in the circumstances, the May lOpublic meeting vill be deferred in respect of this application to a later date and that in the meantime a frrther notice will be issued by the Town. As stated, we ask that the meeting be rescheduled for a minimum of2O, and preferably at least 30, days after the new notice has been issued. This application, which may have very long lasting impacts on the lake, is not one that should be unnecessarily rushed through the process. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Richard A. Campbell

Sent from my iPad

2 Page 20 ci 268 From: Simon Miles < Sent May-02-179:04 PM To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: FaiMewIsland redevelopment proposal, Lakeof Bays Attachments: Crown.LtrHuntsvilleRefairviewO2o5l7.docx;Afl00001.htm; PlanningReport.pdf AU00002.htm; 17-59-01 - FairviewIsland - SP3.pdf;AU00003.htm;17-59-01 - FairviewIsland - SP1 - 11x17.pdf;Afl00004.htm

Dear Kirstin, Many thanks for the very useful information on the application re the development of Faiiwiew island, in Lake of Bays. I have to say that I find the proposal is quite alarming. It has naturally led me to seek more information and to discuss this proposal with others on the lake. I am in need of more time to come to grips with the implications. I have mentioned this to others and I understand that the Town should have given the public a hall 20 days notice ofa public meeting, at a minimum. With all this in mind, I have attached a request to the Mayor and the Council Members, and copied to you, for a reissuance of the notice with at least 20 days, and ideally 30 days or more, notice to allow time for those of us who are likely to suffer from this development having time to consult with each other and the various organizations that tend to get involved in such discussions.

Sincc I could not find the e-mail addresses of the Mayor and Councillors on the Town’s web site, could I ask you to forward the attached to the Mayor and Councillors?

Also, when I was reading the report that you sent me (attached below) I noticed that it makes reference to a number of Appendices. Could you forward these to me too?

Many thanks in advance. Simon Miles

1 Page2l of 268 SIMON MILES

Seasonal resident at , Lake of Bays, Town of Huntsville

2 May 2017

The Mayor of Huntsville and Members of the Council, Town of Huntsville, 37 Main Street East, Huntsville,

Ontario, P11-iIA I

Dear Mayor and Members of the Town Council,

Re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law — Fairview Island (Island No. 2) in Lake of Bays

I am a seasonal resident on , in Lake of Bays, which lies in Brunel, in the Town of Huntsville. Yesterday, a friend of mine sent me a copy of the Town’s notice, dated 27 April 2017, ofa public meeting to be held by the Planning Committee of the Town of Huntsville on 10 May 2017 to discuss the proposal for the redevelopment of Fairview Island and the application of the proponent to seek an amendment to the Official Plan and the Zoning fly-law to accommodate the proposed development. Fairview Island lies immediately to the east of Crown island.

Ms. Kirstin Maxwell has kindly provided me with more information. From what I have read so far, I have to say that I am alarmed at what is being proposed. If the redevelopment were to proceed. it would constitute an enormous change both to Fairview Island and for the lives of those, like me, who live in the immediate vicinity ofFaiiwiew Island. The proposed massive increase in numbers of people on Fairview Island in the summer, the concomitant increase in boats and even aeroplanes and helicopters, and the resultant impact on the natural environment and the still reasonably peaceful atmosphere. are all cause for concern.

I need time to analyze the information received to date, plus further information requested, and to consult with and others who will also be affected by this development if it were to be allowed to proceed.

When discussing this concern over lack of time, I learned from a friend that, legally speaking, the Town has erred in that the notice should have been issued at least 20 days prior to the planned public meeting, that the notice should have made clear how

Page 22 of 268 interested parties should act to preserve appeal rights, and that the notice should have contained far more information than it did.

With all this in mind, I respectthlly request that the Town reissue a notice for a meeting at least 20 days after the date of issuance, and ideally at least 30 days, to give those of us who are concerned about this proposed development time to truly understand the proposal and its implications and to consult with each other, with professional planners, and with various organizations that tend to get involved in such discussions, before preparing our submissions.

I look forward to receiving confirmation that, given the circumstances relating to the issuance of the notice for the public meeting on this matter, the Town will be issuing a new notice, with at least 20 days, and ideally 30 or more days, notice of a rescheduled meeting.

Yours sincerely,

SIMON MILES cc. Kirstin Maxwell

Page 23 of 268 From: Sternberg, Arlen < > Sent: May-02-17 5:19 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: Emily Sternberg Subject: Fairview Islandapplication Attachments: Letter to Town Council dated May 2, 2017.pdf

Importance: High

Kirsdn — Please see the attached letter addressed to the Mayor and Town Council members, the text of which I’ve also copied below. I ask that you please forward this a.s.a.p. to the Mayor and all Town Council members (as I do not have their email addresses; they are not posted on the Town’s website). Thank you kindly for your attention to this.

Re: Application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law — Island No. 2 (Fairview Island) in Lake of Bays

Dear Mayor and Town Council Members,

Iam writing on my and my wife’s behalf regarding the above application, about which the Town issued on April27, 2017 a notice of a public meeting of the Planning Committee of Councilscheduled for May 10, 2017. The application seeks to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-lawto permit redevelopment of Fairview Island as an “institutional tourist establishment” (compared to its current single family resIdential use). We are residents on the Lake (our property faces Fairview Island and is close to it) and as such we will

be directly affected by this proposed development. Iam writing to request that the public meeting scheduled for May 10 to consider this application be deferred to a later date, to allow proper notice to be given to the affected residents and a proper opportunity for them to consult and respond to the application.

The notice that was issued by the Town on April27 (posted on its website — a copy of which Iattach) did not

provide sufficient time and information to the public in advance of the May10 meeting. First, I understand that section 17 (19) of the Planning Act expressly requires that the public meeting “shall be held no earlier than 20 days after the requirements for giving notice have been complied with.” This timing requirement has not been met since this notice was issued by the Town only 14 days before the May 10 meeting (unlike most of the other notices for matters to be considered at that meeting, which appear to have been issued earlier, on April20). Second, this notice provided very little information to the public about the proposed development (only 3 short sentences of very high level information was provided), and did not provide any information as to what steps members of the public must take to preserve appeal rights in this process (which

are content requirements of these notices, Iunderstand).

We therefore respectfully ask that the Town issue a further and proper notice to the public in respect of this application, providing additional information regarding what is being proposed and steps that must be taken to preserve appeal rights (in accordance with the statutory requirements), and ask that the public meeting to consider this application be deferred to a date that is at least 20 days — and preferably at least 30 days — from the date of the new notice. We, and others, are entitled to and need sufficient additional time in order to understand the details of what is being proposed in this application and the implications of it from a planning

1 Page 24 o(268 perspective and how it willimpact all of the directly affected residents. We need time not only to understand the proposal but also to be able to consult with a planner and others, and to prepare responding submissions. It’sof course important that the Town ensures a fair process which allows time for meaningful participation by the residents.

Just based on the limited information we’ve so far had a chance to receive and review regarding this application (Ms. Maxwell kindly provided me with some additional information this morning that I’mjust starting to review), my wife and I have many questions and significant initial concerns about this application. We also understand that a number of other residents, who are just finding out about this matter, also have initial concerns. The proposed development represents a big change in use of the Island compared to the current residential use, and this wilIhave a number of implications. There has already been significant commercial development in this particular location of the Lake,as Fairview Island is in close proximity to BigwinIsland (it neigbhours Bigwinto the west) and also is in close proximity to the Lakeof BaysSailingand Tennis Club. There are environmental, land use, landscape, noise and other initial concerns we have. Again, we need to understand additional details regarding the proposal and to consult with others in order to further assess the application and its various impacts. We can then be in a position to provide submissions to the Town in response to it.

We look forward to the Town’s confirmation that, in the circumstances, the May10 public meeting will be deferred in respect of this application to a later date and that in the meantime a further notice will be issued by the Town. As stated, we ask that the meeting be rescheduled for a minimum of 20, and preferably at least 30, days after the new notice has been issued. This application, which may have very long lasting impacts on the lake, is not one that should be unnecessarily rushed through the process. Thank you for your consideration of this.

Arlen K.Steinberg

Page 25 of 268 From: Barry Campbell I Sent: May-03-17 12:51 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: Subject: Fairview Island, Lake of Bays.

Attached please find a letter concerning the proposed development of Fairview Island, Lake of Bays which I would ask you to forward urgently to the Huntsville Mayor and Council Members. Many thanks.

Barry R Campbell

1 Page 26 of 268 Debra and Barry Campbell

May 2, 2017

Re: Application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law — Island No. 2 (Fairview Island) in Lake of Bays

Dear Mayor and Town Council Members,

I am writing on my and my wife’s behalf regarding the above application, about which the Town issued on April 27, 2017 a notice of a public meeting of the Planning Committee of Council scheduled for May 10, 2017. The application seeks to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By law to permit redevelopment ofFaiiwiew Island as an “institutional tourist establishment” (compared to its current single family residential use).

We are residents on Lake of Bays (our property faces Fairview Island and is close to it) and as such we will be directly affected by this proposed development. Our property, was built in 1904 and is one of the very earliest cottages on the south shore of Lake of Bays. Fairview Island is almost directly across from our property and for most of the past one hundred years Faiwiew Island has been modestly occupied and enjoyed like all of the nearby properties. The proposed development will dramatically change that usage to the potential detriment of many.

I am writing to request that the public meeting scheduled for May 10 to consider this application be deferred to a later date, to allow proper notice to be given to the affected residents and a proper opportunity for them to consult and respond to the application.

The notice that was issued by the Town on April 27 (posted on its website did not provide sufficient time and information to the public in advance of the May 10 meeting. First, I understand that section 17 (19) of the Planning Act expressly requires that the public meeting “shall be held no earlier than 20 days after the requirements for giving notice have been complied with.” This timing requirement has not been met since this notice was issued by the Town only 14 days before the May 10 meeting (unlike most of the other notices for matters to be considered at that meeting, which appear to have been issued earlier, on April 20). Second, this notice provided very little information to the public about the proposed development (only 3 short sentences of very high level information was provided), and did not provide any information as to what steps members of the public must take to preserve appeal rights in this process (which are content requirements of these notices, I understand).

We therefore respectfully ask that the Town issue a further and proper notice to the public in respect of this application, providing additional information regarding what is being proposed and steps that must be taken to preserve appeal rights (in accordance with the statutory requirements), and ask that the public meeting to consider this application be deferred to a date that is at least 20 days — and preferably at least 30 days — from the date of the new notice.

Page 27 of 268 We, and others, are entitled to and need sufficient additional time in order to understand the details of what is being proposed in this application and the implications of it from a planning perspective and how it will impact all of the directly afiècted residents. We need time not only to understand the proposal but also to be able to consult with a planner and others, and to prepare responding submissions. It’s of course important that the Town ensures a fair process which allows time for meaningful participation by the residents.

Just based on the limited information we’ve so far had a chance to receive and review regarding this application, my wife and I have many questions and significant initial concerns about this application. We also understand that a number of other residents, who are just finding out about this matter, also have initial concerns.

The proposed development represents a big change in use of the Island compared to the current residential use, and this will have a number of implications. There has already been significant commercial development in this particular part of the Lake, as Fairview Island is in close proximity to Bigwin Island (it neigbhours Bigwin to the west) and also is in close proximity to the Lake of Bays Sailing and Tennis Club. There are environmental, land use, landscape, noise and other initial concerns we have. Again, we need to understand additional details regarding the proposal and to consult with others in order to further assess the application and its various impacts. We can then be in a position to provide submissions to the Town in response to it.

We look forward to the Town’s confirmation that, in the circumstances, the May 10 public meeting will be deferred in respect of this application to a later date and that in the meantime a further notice will be issued by the Town. As stated, we ask that the meeting be rescheduled for a minimum of 20, and preferably at least 30, days after the new notice has been issued. This application, which may have very long lasting impacts on the lake, is not one that should be unnecessarily rushed through the process. Thank you for your consideration of this.

Yours Truly,

Barry Campbell cc; KirstinMaxwell

Page 28 of 268

I From: Sue Barker Sent: May-03-17 9:29 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell; Scott Aitchison Cc:

Subject: Proposed re-zoning of Fairview Island

Hello Kirsten and Scott,

It has just come to our attention that there is a proposed re-zoning of Fairview Island from single family residential use to “institutional tourist establishment”.

You have received letters from Richard Campbell and Arlen Sternberg, and Iwould like to echo their concerns and ask for a postponement of this meeting until environmental assessment and impact studies can be carried out and the affected community can be contacted.

One of the reasons we have such a healthy lake is because of the foresight and care of institutions like LOBA,the residents and cottagers of Lake of Bays and Huntsville, and the insightful planning of both the Huntsville and LOB councils. We are very fortunate to have the Lake of Bays Sailing Club program located at Glenmount Dock and it would be directly impacted by both the the increased car and boat traffic for the proposed development.

Iam concerned that development on this scale is reaching us third and fourth hand and that something that may have a very long lasting impact on the lake is being rushed through without considering the full reach of its effects.

Ithank you for your consideration of this and hope you will postpone this meeting.

Sincerely, Sue Barker

Baysville, ON Sent from my iPad

1 Page 29 of 268 From: Forbes Sent: May-04-17 8:27 AM To: Kirstin Maxwell; Scott Aitchison Subject: Re-zoning proposal, Fairview Island

Importance: High

Good morning,

It came to our attention yesterday afternoon that a proposal has been put forward to request that Fairview Island zoning be altered from single family residential use to “institutional tourist establishment” and that a public meeting is to be held by the Planning Committee on May lO. We would like to request that the public meeting be rescheduled so that we, as

the property owners of , can properly understand the request for re-zoning and assess the potential impact that such re-zoning would have around our property and surrounding environment.

Glenmount Road is a small, 24-foot wide dead-end street running within a few metres of the shoreline and there are many children present throughout the summer months. Given that it has a public dock and its proximity to Fairview Island, re zoning that island to allow it to be used for commercial purposes would likely result in increased vehicular traffic and parked cars wishing to access the lake in order to access a commercial establishment. Aside from the road being too small to accommodate any increased vehicular traffic and the fact that any toxic fluid (oils, coolants, etc) leaking from vehicles immediately enters the lake, there is also the potential for increased boat traffic around Glenmount Dock. Such increased traffic will subject the children that attend the sailing school and tennis club immediately beside the Glenmount Dock to an increased risk of being injured. This risk is not just limited to cars, but also boats since it is not uncommon for children to be swimming and for the sailing school to have as many as 20 sailing dinghies with children in them in the waters near Glenmount Dock when sailing lessons are in session.

These are only some of the issues that concern us and we understand that this correspondence is not the appropriate forum to identify and address all of them. As such we request that we be given more time to understand the whole picture surrounding the request to have FaiMew Island re-zoned to commercial so that we can prepare a formal response for the Planning Committee meeting. Please consider postponing the May 10 Planning Committee meeting so that we have the maximum amount of time as permitted in the by-laws to prepare a response.

Thank you for your consideration,

Julie & Forbes Si[verthome.

1 Page 30 of 268 From: Chris Karn < > Sent: May-03-17 10:05 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject Fwd: Proposed re-zoning of Fairview Island

This letter expresses my concern and my wish for a postponement. My property at would be severely impacted by this proposed development by the increased water and road traffic. Sincerely Christine Karn

Chris Karn Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: Sue Barker c > Date: May 3,2017 at 9:29:04 PM EDT To: Kirstin.maxwellhuntsvilIe.ca, mayorscott4huntsvi1le.ca

Hello Kirsten and Scott,

It has just come to our attention that there is a proposed re-zoning of Fairview Island from single family residential use to ‘institutional tourist establishment’.

You have received letters from Richard Campbell and Arlen Stemberg, and I would like to echo their concerns and ask for a postponement of this meeting until environmental assessment and impact studies can be carried out and the affected community can be contacted.

One of the reasons we have such a healthy lake is because of the foresight and care of institutions like LOBA. the residents arid cottagers of Lake of Bays and Huntsville, and the insightful planning of both the huntsville and LOB councils. We are very fortunate to have the Lake of Bays Sailing Club program located at Glenmount Dock and it would be directly impacted by both the the increased car and boat traffic for the proposed development.

1am concerned that development on this scale is reaching us third and fourth hand and that something that may have a very long lasting impact on the lake is being rushed through without considering the fill reach of its effects.

I thank you for your consideration of this and hope you will postpone this meeting.

Sincerely, Sue Barker

1 Page 31 of 268 Baysville, ON Sent from my iPad

2 Page 32 of 268 ______

From: Cathy Le’ > Sent: May-03-17 7:19 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Cc: Subject: Re: Application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law - Island No 2 Fairview Island in Lake of Bays

Thank you for speaking with me today regarding the proposal for redevelopment of Fairview Island.

As discusssed, we, as owners of ,the island property immediately to the south of Island 2- Fairview Island, should have received official notice by mail from the Town of Huntsville of the above-noted Application. Although you said that we were ‘flagged to receive this notice ,to date we have not received same at our mailing address In Toronto which is on record with the Town of Huntsville.

Further, we own 2 Lake of Bays cottage properties at LresPectivelv. We have received no notice as owners of these properties either. Our property at immediately south of the property owned by Arlen and Emily Sternberg who have already been in discussions with you.

As owners of 3 properties which are in close proximity To the lands subject to the Application we ought to have been notified in a timely fashion of this proposal which will undoubtedly impact our quiet enjoyment of our properties.

We are writing to request that the public meeting scheduled For May10 to consider this application be deferred to a later date To allow proper notice to be given to us and our neighbours on Lake of Bays So that we may have a proper opportunity to consult and respond to the Application.

Please forward this email outlining our concerns to the Mayor and Town Council members.

Thank you.

Cathy and Simon Lewis

Sent from my iPhone

1 Page 33 of 268 From: Town of Huntsville Sent May-04-17 8:47 AM To: Jasmine Last Subject: Fwd: (4963}: Attention: Kirstin Maxwell. Re: Application to amend the Official Plan and

Zoning By-law — Island No.2 (Fairview Island) in Lake of Bays

——icpILIhOVCIns IiflC

Forwarded message From: Date: 5/3/2017 8:46:16 PM Subject: Attention: Kirstin Maxwell. Re: Application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law — Island No. 2 (Fairview Island) in Lake of Bays

Attention: Kirstin Maxwell

Dear Mayor and Town Council Members,

It is shameful, that in this day and age of concern about the environment and responsible stewardship of the Lake of Bays community, a major Lake of Bays island willbe converted from low- risk residential to high-risk commercial use. Especially without appropriate public notice and input.

As 4th and 5th generation cottagers on Lake of Bays (facing FaiMew Island), Iwas distressed to learn that Fairview Island is to be redeveloped from residential to commercial use. I was further distressed to find out that a public meeting was scheduled for May 10th. This hastily arranged public meeting gives no time for the public to obtain and assess the information regarding the redevelopment to commercial use. It gives no time for the public to develop a thoughtful and meaningful position on the redevelopment of Fairview Island. Therefore, we respectfully request that this public meeting be postponed for at least 30 days.

From a reading of the limited information regarding the redevelopment of FaiMew, we are concerned! It seems to us that the redevelopment to commercial use from residential use, in the middle of Lake of Bays, is totally at odds with the values of the District of Lake of Bays, Township of Huntsville and certainly the Lake of Bays Association. In addition, there are many questions

* how many individuals is this corporate retreat expected to accommodate * how are they shuttled to and from the island, where is parking * where do food, beverage and laundry suppliers load/unload .... likely Glenmount Dock * how does all this affect the Sailing Club * who willrent the Fairview facility,what kind of activities willtake place * how willall this affect boat traffic and noise, safety of other boaters

Given all this, we request that you reschedule the public meeting and provide more appropriate notice.

Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to your response.

I Page 34 of 268 Susan Bowman, Randall and Mike Miller

Lake of Bays

Sent from Miller’siPad

2 Page 35 of 268 From: AnthonyWhiftingham Sent: May-18-17 9:33 PM To:

Subject: FYI -- Summary of FairviewIsland DevelopmentMeeting

Report on FAIRWEW ISLAND Information Meetiiiu I Saturday May 13, 2017

From: Tony Whittingham ± David Lana (LoB Cottaaers

To: Fain’iew Island interest community

Date: 18May20l7

This brief note is intended as an “informal” update --and further commentary’ — on the Fain’iew Island development proposal and the corresponding zoning change under review by the Town Council of Huntsville.

Amidst a flurry of concerned emails --and after discussions between The Konrad Group (Fairview Island proposed “Developers), the Lake of Bays Association (“LOBA”) and officials from the Town of Huntsville-- a Public Meeting took place in Huntsville (‘Active Learning Centre) last Saturday momma May 13 from 9- 11am.

David Lang & I were able to attend this meeting -- as interested cottagers from Glenmount.

We offer the following - unsolicited - report:

(NOTE: This is not in any way a proper ‘legal” document-- merely a summary of impressions offered for those not able to attend)

Page 36 of 268 Meeting Attendance: approx 30

• Town officials (eg Huntsville Chief Planner Kirstin Maxwell) • Developer group (members of Konrad family) + Duke Engineering planning assistants • current Fairview Island owner (Jill Langford) • interested public o Clovelly o Glenmount (including Ian & Sue Karn, Gloria Woodside) o Nithgrove Road

The meeting was hosted’ by the developer (Konrad family) to “answer any/all questions” by public and other lake stakeholders.

No Formalspeeches or presentations took place. The developers said they wet-cmaking themselves available to explain, clarify and answer questions. Engagement took place on an informal ad-hoc basis among small groups. There was no commentary and/or guidance from Town officials.

Wall-size maps & charts displaying the Fairview project were placed throughout the room.

Tasty morning refreshments were in good supply!

The two primary “spokespersons’ I. CEO Ceordie Konrad 2. CFO David Konrad (father)

No attempts were made to “sell” to virtues of the project. Conversely, no attempts were made to disparage the proposal -

Summary of key points uttered:

I, Earliest construction to take place on Fairview will be 2019. 2. Island construction work may comprise 5 cottage-style dwellings + several common buildings 3. Glenmount Road AND government wharf will NOT be used as construction jump-off point. 4. Nithgrove Road private shoreline lot (owned by Langford family) MAY be used as boat-launch for Fairview users but NOT for construction. 5. Construction jump-off will be done by prior agreement with LoB private Marinas (eg Baysville, Port Cuntungton etc) 6. All environmental concerns fully contemplated & rigorously covered by covenant 7. Proposed rationale of”Camp” component of Faiiwiew proposal is defended by Konrad family as pan of their own “corporate culture” 8. Safety Net: the proposed zoning bylaw change (to allow for “camp” tourism use) is itselfrescrictive and would strictly “bind” any subsequent purchasers.

Topnote: The atmosphere at the May 13 meeting was cordial. The questions were free-flowing and non combative. The personal performance of Konrad Group -- led by 29-year-old Geordie Konrad & his amiable CFO (and father) David Konrad -- generally inspired confidence and goodwill.

(One illustration of the developers’ local “sensitivities”: David Konrad described in vivid detail the beautiful biosphere of Fairview Island--including the White Pine zone, the Hemlock zone & the Red Oak zone. lie clearly appreciates and values that land.)

2 Page 37 of 268 In all, a generally good impression was made for all cottagers and those lake stewards concerned with the welfare of Lake of Bays.

NOTE: For those not able to attend this meeting, the developers have scheduled a SECOND public meeting -- Saturday 3rd June from 12 - 2:60.

Come & ask questions. Meet the players. Exercise your civic rights!

The aeEualdebate--and vote -- at Huntsville Town Counsel takes place Wednesday June 14 at 09:30 am

Best regards,

Tony Whitlingham (cottager)

NOTE: Photos attached below. Included are CEO Geordie Konrad. See also several valued LOB community guardians.

Anthony Whittingham

3 Page 38 of 268 ION

4 May 2017

Tanya Calleja Clerk Town of Huntsville Town Hall, 37 Main Street East Huntsville ON P1H 1A1

Regarding: Official Plan Amendment (OPA#13) and Zoning By-law Amendment (Z/22/2017/HTE) on Island No. 2, Lake of Bays, Geographic Township of Brunel, Town of Huntsville

Dear Ms. Calleja;

The Lake of Bays Association (“LOBA”)has been contacted by a significant number of members who have expressed concern and are seeking more information on the above matter.

We have been in contact with both the developer and the planner and understand the matter has been removed from the agenda of the Huntsville May10 Planning Committee meeting and rescheduled for the June 14 meeting. We would appreciate it if you can confirm that this is correct.

Additionally, we have been advised that the developer will hold a public open house prior to the June 14 meeting to discuss the proposal and answer questions from the public.

LOBAsupports the deferral and the actions which the developer proposes to engage and communicate with the community.

Thank you. /c

Ian Beverley President cc. Marie Poirier, MP Planning Kirstin Maxwell, Manager of Planning, Town of Huntsville Carrie Sykes, Clerk, Township of Lake of Bays

lAke ofBaysAssoeiathrn HON S Baysville ON POll TAO t: 705-767-3395 [email protected] www.Ioha.ca Page 39 of 268 [email protected] industry. requirements. Fairview Marina allow Re: Town P1H Huntsville, 37 Manager Kirstin Main Fairview 1A1

for E-Mail: of presently Maxwell Baysville Baysville It Island. St. the Huntsville has of ON East Planning Island- redevelopment been If Marina Marina has necessary, brought

Lake BAYSWLLE dockage is is of fully a Bays, to full-service we of and our supportive Fairview are Huntsville parking attention prepared marina Island capability of Yours President that Fax: Tel: Baysville, planning to Page on including expand Truly 705-767-3323 zoning 705-767-2283 Box Lake 40 for of applications 100 Ontario of 268 20 our and dockage,

Bays. MARINA or facilities OPA more applications parking, that boat5 to relate accommodate which and to have boat could

the www.baysvlllemarina.com been growth storage, be future submitted dedicated

of Website: Baysville our to to 17056462207 PLANNING 04:10:03 p.m. 2017—05—03 1/2 THEflj$JRIGMUNICIPAUTYOF MUSKOKA

PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 70 PINE STREET, BRACEBRIOGE, ONTARIO P1L 1N3 Telephone (705) 645-2231 OR 1-800-4614210 (705 area code) Fax (705) 646-2207 wwwmuskolw.on.ca

May 3, 2017

Ms. Tanya Calleja Municipal Clerk Town of Huntsville, 37 Main Street, P.O. Box 2700 Huntsville, Ontario, POA 11<0

VIAFAX ONLY

Dear Ms. Calleja:

Re: CONCURRENT COMMENTS Official Plan Amendment No. 13 (Langford and Lalor) Zoning Application V22/17/HTE Island No. 2 (Fairview Island), Lake of Bays Town of Huntsville Recommendation

District staff would not be opposed to the approval of the above noted applications provided the appropriate development control techniques are used to direct all shoreline development outside of areas of”Type 1” fish habitat.

Notice of Committee and Council’s decision respecting the above noted applications is requested.

Analysis

The subject property is located within the “Waterfront” designation of the Muskoka Official Plan and has frontage on Lake of Bays, which is Identified as a ‘Moderately Sensitive” on Schedule “F” of the Muskoka Official Plan. It is our understanding that the proposed amendments would permit the subject lands to be redeveloped as a corporate retreat.

The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry mapping has identified areas of “Type 1” fish habitat along the northern portion of the shoreline, as well as along Sunset Point. However, it would appear that adequate area exists outside of this sensitive habitat for the construction of shoreline structures, including docks.

While we understand that the Town of Huntsville Zoning By-law does not specifically include docks In Its setback requirements from Fish Habitat, it is recommended that appropriate development control techniques be used to locate all proposed shoreline structures and docking envelopes outside of areas of identified “Type 1” fish habitat. Alternatively, District staff would recommend the submission of a fisheries habitat assessment in order to ensure that fish habitat will be protected in accordance with provincial and federal requirements. In discussion with the applicant’s agent, we understand that the proponents are amenable to relocating the planning shoreline structures outside of this sensitive habitat.

In addition, a review of the species occurrence data provided by the Natural Heritage information Centre (NHIC) has confirmed that the subject property may contain habitat for endangered species. Therefore, it

Managing OeLeacy Together 17056462207 PLANNING 04:10:19p.m. 2017—05—03 2/2

is recommended that the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) be consulted to ensure that the proposed development will not have any negative impacts on species at risk habitat.

Yours truly, 4fl/t(q Lisa Marden Planner

Page 42 of 268 HAYSTACKBAYMARINE LTD. 1170 PORT CUNNINGTONROAD DWIGHT,ONTARIO POA1H0

Kirstin Maxwell,

Manager of Planning

Town of Huntsville

37 Main Street East

Huntsville, On.

P1H IA1

RE: Fairview Island—Lake of Bays, Huntsville

Dear Kirstin,

This letter I sent in support of the planning application for Fairview Island in Lake of Bays.

It is our understanding that this application would rely on the support services of many local businesses, including marinas. The role of the marina in this development would be to provide dockage, fuel, service and storage for boats as well as mainland vehicle parking.

We confirm that we would be able to provide this service Ibr the development At present we would have appmx. 4 dockage slips and lots of room for vehicle parking. An application for increased dockage has been submitted to Lake of Bays Twsp. and is in process.

Developments of this type are essential to the continued presence of commercial marinas on the lake and as such are welcomed.

Sincerely, Susan Grant

Haystack Bay Marine Ud.

Page 43 of 268 Apr.20.2017 3:49PM o,O018 P. 2/2

NOTICEOFA COMPLETEAPPLICATIONANDPUBLICMEETING CONCERNINGA PROPOSEDAMENDMENTTO THEOFFICIALPLANOFTHETOWN OFHUNThVILLE. ANDANAMENDMENTTOZONINGBY-LAW200&66P TAKENOTICETHEPLANNINGCOMMITTEEOFCOUNCIL WILLHOLDA PUBLICMEETING May 1O. Z0JJ at 9:30 AM. at the Council Chambers, Town Hall,37 MaIn Street East, HuntsvIlle

SYNOPSIS:To amend the OlIlclai Plan and Zoning By-law to enable the redevelopment elan instituilonef tourist estabIithmcnt. The lands are known as Island No.2 (Failview lslandj In Lake of Bays.

IF YOUWISH TO BE NOTIFIEDof tile decisIon ol Council on the proposed offIcial plan amendment and/or zonIng by-law amendment you must make a written request to the clerk of the Town of Huntsville (see address below). PLEASENOTE:Allcomments and submissIons received will become part of the public record. Comments received as partof the public participation process for this proposal will be considered by Committee and Council. FORMORE1NWHM&flONabout tills matter, contact the Town of Huntsville Planning Department 37 Main St E, Huntsville, ON. PIN 1A1 In person: 8:SOa.mAaOp,m. Telephone: (705) 7B9-1751 (Ext 2351). email: [email protected] website: www.huntwUie.ca April27, 2017.

EXPLANATIONOF THE PURPOSE AND EFFECT OFTHE PROPOSED OFFl1AL PLANAMENDMENT and ZONING BY-LAWAMENDMENT (Langford/Lalor) Application has been made for Official Plan Amendment (OPA#13) and Zoning By-law Amendment (2/22/2017/THE) on Island No. 2, Lakeof Bays, Geographic TownshIp of Brunel, Town of Huntsville. The proposed amendments would change the Official Plan designation of the lands from Waterfront to a Special Policy Waterfront Area, and re-zone the lands from Shoreline Residential Four (SM) to an Institutional Camp (C33) zone. Access to the island would be through a lot on Nlthgrove Road. These appikatlons would allow the lands to be re-developed, and permit the Is!and to be used as a corporate retreat.

OF TRANSPORTATION 7MINISTRV I Northeastern Region NO OBJECTION

Page 44 or 268 2423518 Ontario Inc.

April 24, 2017

Kirstin Maxwell Manager of Planning Town of Huntsville 37 Main Street East Huntsville, ON P1H 1A1

Re: Fairview Island — Lake of Bays, Huntsville

Dear Kirstin,

This letter is to advise that our marina has been made aware of the Zoning and OPA applications submitted to allow for the re-development of the Fairview Island Property. It is our understanding that the proposed planning changes are essentiaily to allow for the return of a commercial institutional use, which would rely on the support services of many local businesses, including marinas.

We believe the recapitalization of properties (such as FaiMew island) that depend on commercial marinas for docking, parking, storage, fuel, maintenance, shuttle service and other supplies are critical to the future of our industry. We can confirm that our marina has capacity in all areas of our business to contribute to the access requirements of this development. In addition, we would be more than pleased to expand our facilities and operation should there be additional need in the future. Currently we have 5 boat dock slips and 7 mainland parking spaces that could be dedicated to the Fairview Island property.

We fully support this planning application, as well as any other responsible development initiatives that will help with the growth and sustainability of our industry.

Regards,

2423518 Ontario Inc. (Port Cunnington Marina)

David A. Smith President

Page 1 I Page 45 01268 /

May 5, 2017

To the Mayor of Huntsville To the Town Council do Kirstin Maxwell, BA, MOP, RPP Manager of Planning

Town of Huntsville Town Hall I 37 Main Street East (705) 789-1751 ext 2351 1-888-696-4255 ext 2351 www.hun tsville.ca

Re: Application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law — l5land No. 2 (Fairview Island) in Lake of Bays

We are writing regarding the above application, and notice of a public meeting of the Planning Committee of Council scheduled for May 10, 2017. The application, which we learned of yesterday, seeks to amend the OfficialPlan and Zoning By-lawto permit redevelopment of Fairview Island as an “institutional tourist establishment” (compared to its current single family residential use). We are residents on the Lakeat 1192-14 Glenmount Road - and in fact our property faces Fairview Island - and as such we will be directly affected by this proposed development. lam writing to request that the public meeting scheduled for May10 be deferred to a later date, to allow us the time to learn about the proposal and have the opportunity to consider the impact to our local environment.

Thank you for your consideration of this. We look forward to your response. Sincerely

Page 46 of 268 From: Jeff Biggs To: KirsfinMa,cwell Subject: conversion of Fai,view Island Date: May-04-17 8:04:50 PM

Attention: Kirstin Maxwell

Dear Mayor and Town Council Members,

As a cottager on Lake of Bays for over 59 years Iwas extremely disappointed to hear that the Fairview Island is to be converted from low impact residential use to high impact commercial use. Particularly without, in my opinion, allowing proper discussion on all the issues that will impact not only the permanent and seasonal residents but the environment and infrastructure on the mainland surrounding the island and neighboring bays of the lake.

Itherefore would ask that you respectfully postpone any required meeting regarding this issue until a more suitable time when Council and a majority of the residents in the affected area(s) - permanent and seasonal - have ample opportunity to research and or prepare for the meeting. May

Isuggest perhaps a date during the summer months Julyor August.Atime when the majority of all residents would be available.

I lookforward to your co operation on this very important issue.

Thankyou, .Jeff Biggs

Page 47 of 268 From: BrianGibbings To: KirstinMaxwell Cc: Scott Aitchison Subject: Applicationto Amend OfficialPlan - FaIMew Is. Lakeof Bays Date: May-04-17 11:39:11 AM

Dear Kristin,

Inthe last 48 hours, I became aware of the above, schedified for a meeting May 10, 2017.

Thisis not an adequate amount of time for us to digest such a far-reaching change for us as full-time and part-time residents of LakeBays,

We therefore request that the meeting be delayed for at least 30 days for study and input to Council and Mayor.

Whether or not the meeting isrescheduled from May10, we would appreciate a response to questions raised below with regard to process.

Kindregards,

BrianGibbings

Ouestions - Aunlication to Amend Official Plan - Fairview Is. Lake of Bays • is there a statutory minimum Notice period in business days or weeks to interested parties for changes such as being proposed? • What is that statutory notice? • Is Notice only by regular mailto TaxRolladdresses or are other means used? • How issuch Notice be guaranteed effective for interested parties who are part-time residents and whose mailingaddresses may differ from the tax rolls • Was there compliance with required Notice in Fairview? • If Notice was noncompliant, which municipal employee inthe Planning Department signed it? • Ifthe Notice was noncompliant, when was Counciland the mayor’soffice aware of Non compliance? • Please provide a list of the emails for Councillorswho willbe involvedin the process on and after May10, 2017

Page 48 of 268 From: Forbes To: Kirstin Maxwell;Scott Pjtchisc4l Subject: FW: Glenmount Road owners - Action Requested Please! Date: May-04-17 1)35:21 AM Attachments: Letter to Town Council dated May 2. 2017.edf

Good morning,

it I was copied on the email below yesterday evening regaring Fairview Island but noticed was addressed to the wrong recipient. I believe it was to be sent to you.

Thanks,

Forbes Silverthome.

From: BruceConnellI Sent: May-03-179:49 PM To:

Subject: H mount ftbad owners - Action Requested Please!

To the Mayor and Town Councillors:

I have just received an email about an upcoming rezoning proposal and meeting on May lath regarding FaiR’iewIsland. Iwould respectfully request that, at the very least, that meeting be rescheduled to a later date so that concerned cottagers such as ourselves would have the opportunity to familiarize ourselves with this issue and prepare an appropriate response. Hopefullythat meeting could be rescheduled to July or August when many more affected cottagers would be available.

Our cottage at is adjacent to both the sailingclub and the tennis club and among other concerns, is the fear of congestion with people illegallyleaving their cars at those private facilities in order to use the Glenmount Dockas water access to the island. I also share the other concerns raised by Arlen and EmilySternberg (letter attached).

Sincerely, Bruce and Maeve Cannell

From:BruceConnell Sent: May3, 2017 8:34 PM To:

Page 49 of 268 Subject: Fwd:Glenmount Roadowners - ActionRequested Please!

HiFellow Glenmount Roaders:

Just received this worrisome email. Ihope to send at least a brief email by tomorrow. Ido think that asking that the May 10th meeting be delayed so that we have time to get more information is a good idea! Ifyou could also send an email ASAPthat too would be helpful.

Thanks, Bruce

Page 50 of 268 From: DanShut To: KirsUnMaxwell Subject: FairviewIslandrezoning Date: May-04-1710:58:10AM

Ms. Maxwell:

As a resident and owner of Town of Iluntsville. I request that you consider deferring the May 10 meeting re: the Fairview Island rezoning application. This will give Clovelly residents more time to consider the details outlined in the just recently received application.

I am panicularv concerned about the construction of the ‘service dock” on the north side of the island and its barge traffic, with the intended 2-3 year use to facilitate demolition and constuction on the island, and subsequent use after construction is complete. It appears that this dock and its traffic will be within several hundred meters olClovelly Rd. residences.

Your consideration of this matter is appreciated. —-1Dan D. Shilt

Page SI of 268 — a —

I I

I. I

From: doug.connell I Sent: May-03-17 11:58 PM To: Web Contact Cc: Subject:

Dear Mayor and Council

I am writing to express my concern regarding the proposal to rezone Fairview Island on Lake of Bays. This proposal is a major undertaking which will significantly affect the Lake and its adjacent properties. It is likely to have significant detrimental effects and adversely affect the neighbours and adjacent residents

I am co owner of a cottage at . Currently due to the adjacent sailing club and tennis club our cottage has been impacted significantly by traffic and boat congestion. Congestion of the access road and adjacent boat access is already a problem which this proposal would significantly compound. The full implications of this project cannot be understood from the information that has been provided to date. It is essential that those who may be adversley affected have sufficient time to consider the proposal, ask for clarification where required and present a view that would lead to a more balanced assessment of the pros and cons of this proposal.

I would request that sufficient time be allowed before this proposal is presented to the council to allow those affected to prepare and organize their thoughts and therefore allow for a fair and balanced assessment.

Yours sincerely, Douglas Connell

Page 52 of 268 From: EhElbaz To: KirstinMaxwell Cc: Forbes; Subject: Amended Plan Proposal re FalMew Island Date: May-04-17 10:51:43 AM Attachments: Letter re Amended Plan nmoosal re Fairveiw Island May 3. 2017.doa

Ms. Maxwell,

1,along with my wife and Co-Owners are residents of across from the proposed Fairview Island development and have concerns regarding such development.

I have attached a self-explanatory letter much along the lines of others you will receive from our concerned neighbours, looking to defer the public meeting scheduled for May 10, to a later date.

Thank you for considering this and we look forward to your response.

Regards,

Eli Elbaz Cpa Ca

Page 53 of 268 From: EllenDaniel To: IGrstinMaxwell Subject: Nithgrove Rd Date: May-08-172:25:36 PM

Hi Lilly sad to. hear that all this is staiting up again ,only worse this time I am thie third generation spending my summers at Nithgrove. Our small community was never meant have this amount of traffic Noise ,,cars speeding in and out Iwas almost taken out by a speedig dump truck has the last time when they bulidozerd the back let property. If Fairview island is granted their request , Ni[grove will forever be changed and not for [lie better.. Also concerned about the enviroment. The damage to the fish habitat a log Nithgroveas well as [he effect of the number of boats and the damage caused by the wake of these boats and changes that will occur ,,that will change our quiet little community into a play ground for the rich and fameish and there boats ,and planes and even helicopter. It is also a big concern about noisc.as we all know have far noise travels over water at night. This development will forever distroy the quict,peacefulncss of our small community of Nithgrovc.

Thank You Ellen Daniel

Page 54 of 268 From: Robert Harley To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: Postponement of meeting OverFairviewIsland Date: May-04-17 12:42:3R PM

Hello Kirsten,

I would like the meeting to be postponed so that Tmay come up to speed on this application. I live on and use the public dock on South Portage but am also a owner of a family eouage on and as such will see traffic increased as well as parking issues on the right of wa9 on NithgroveDr. We are late coining into this as our mother passed in Dec and we arejust starting to get emails about this situation.

Thanks

Page 55 of 268 From: Town of Huntsville To: lasmire Last Subject: Fwd: {5059}: Farie.’j Island Zoning and Development Proposal Date: May-08-17 11:21:06 AM

eply al ilis mc-

Forwarded message From: Date: 5/8/2017 11:03:35AM Subject: Fairview Island Zoning and Development Proposal

Re: Application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law — Island No. 2 (Fairview Island) in Lake of Bays

I am writing to request the planning documents that willbe presented to the planning committee on June 14th. Could you send me the plans for proposed development for this property and the agenda for the meeting.

I have just recently been informed about this application. My property is situated directly across from the property mentioned in the application which seeks to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit redevelopment of Fairview Island as an “institutional tourist establishment” (compared to its current single family residential use).

We have been residents at since 1966 and have seen this property transition from a quiet boys and girls camp to a family cottage compound. It has always been a quiet island, which we have always appreciated. We are very concerned about the proposed property application and the number of people, boats and potential disturbances which could result.

We understand there willbe an open house or some meeting to discuss the plans. Can you please add me to the invitation list.

Thanks very much for your consideration,

Lynn Roblin (Dibblee-Roblin Coftaqe)

Page 56 of 268 Dibblee-Roblin Cottage Lake of Bays, ON

May4, 2017

To the Mayor of Huntsville To the Town Council Kirstin Maxwell, BA, MOP, RPP Manager of Planning do J Huntsville Town Hall Main Street East Town I37 of I 1-888-696-4255 2351 (705) 789-1751 ext 2351 I ext www. huntsville. ca

Re: Application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law — Island No. 2 (Fairview Island) in Lake of Bays

I am writing on behalf of my family (Dibblee and Roblins), who cc-own the cottage at the address above, regarding the above application, and notice of a public meeting of the Planning Committee of Council scheduled for May 10, 2017. We were just informed about this application yesterday and want to express our concern about the lack of notice to us and area residents. Our cottage is situated directly across from the property mentioned in the application which seeks to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-lawto permit redevelopment of Fairview Island as an “institutional tourist establishment” (compared to its current single family residential use).

We have had insufficient time to prepare for any meetings and have not been involved in any consultations regarding the property development. In fact, we just heard about the proposal this week and are very surprised to be finding out details so late in the process. We are writing to request that the public meeting scheduled for May lobe deferred to a later date, to allow us the time to learn about the proposal and have the opportunity to consider what impacts this proposal could bring and to make sure that representatives of the neighbour hood can be involved.

Thank you for your consideration of this request. We look forward to your response.

Sincerely yours, tUL

Lynn Roblin co-owner with Marjorie Dibblee, Jim Dibblee, Dave Dibblee and Tom Dibblee

Page 57 of 268 From: PeggyClarke To: KirstcnMaxwell Cc: Lil[QBarnes Subject: FaiMew Island zoning application Date: May-04-17 12:48:51 PM

Ms. Maxwell.

ASresidents of .. adjacent to the current parking lot for access to Fairview Island, we are extremely concerned about possible changes to zoning and access, with all of the obvious ramifications.

We understand that a Town of Huntsville meeting to address a 2onrng application has been slated for May 10. With all of the issues involved, for both Nithgrove and Clovclly residents, we request that the meeting be deferred in order to gather all relevant facts which will come into play.

It appears that this issue will affect both the Town of l-luntsville and the Township of Lake of Bays, and deserves full consideration and due process.

Please ensure that this request for deferral reaches the appropriate party today. Thank you.

Yours,

TanMacGregor and Peggy Clarke

Page 58 cf 268 be likely 10th the are May meeting affected have on who response. that more would meeting least, cottagers many of and very appropriate ourselves an when the as at proposal concerns such August prepare that, or valid and I rezoning July and cr268 request cottagers to 59 issue Page this serious upcoming the with an concerned respectfully rescheduled echo I be that about luth would so I ourselves Councillors: could May email date proposal. AM j an available. Island. Town this later be 11:39 meeting a meeting familiarize by and Pringle to to received that Fairview would Zoning Contact Mayor Valerie just May-04-17 affected Web the be have Hopefully rescheduled regarding I opportunity to From: cottagers Subject: Sent:

To — To: It would be wrong to rush this through.

Our cottage at is adjacent to both the sailing club and the tennis club and, among other concerns, is the fear of congestion (it is quite congested with SailingClub activities already) with people illegallyleaving their cars at those private facilities in order to use the Glenmount Dockas water access to the island

Ialso share the other concerns raised by Arlen and EmilySternberg (letter attached).

ValeriePringle

Page 60 of 268 From: roger staig To: kirstin Maxwell Cc: Scott Aitihison Subject: Zoning Meeting May 10 Fairview Island Date: May-04-17 10:41:14 AM

As a resident of Huntsville Lam asking that the May 10 meeting proceed as scheduled. You have done an adequate job of noti’ing every owner near Fain’iew including many living in the Township. In any conditional real estate transaction such as the Offer on Fairview, time is critical. Let’s proceed. See you May 10 at 9:30 Roger Staig

Page 61 of 268 From: AnneTurner To: KirstinMaxwell Cc: Subject: FaiMewIslandRezoning Date: Jane-04-172:45:31PM

Dear Ms.Maxwell,

My cottage is close to the Nithgrove parking lot and island access point.

I was not comforted by the Konmd information session on Saturday. My concerns were only heightened and I came away with the opinion that their intention for the island development is SOLELY for corporate use.

The Konrad Group is a digital company with 200 + employees having clients like CRC, MacDonalds, Loblaws, CocaCola etc. The employees are young and the company continues to recruit like minded individuals who are not the type to sit in Muskoka chairs reading books.

I believe they will not have the integrity olLake of Bays a priority when the come en mass to visit the island for’ team building perks and incentives”.

My immediate concern is that the only committed parking and access to the island is the Nithgrove one which will not accommodate large numbers of people. My long term concern is the overdevelopment of the island with usage by large numbers of people at a time and all the ramiflcations that entails re: septic, waste management, noise and light pollution, large boat and pleasure craft traffic.

I utterly oppose the rezoning application and development of Fain’iew Island as outlined in the Poirier Report.

Kirsten, will you please include this email as part olthe information package that is fonvarded to Town Council in preparation for the June 14th planning meeting.

Respectfully yours, Anne Turner

Page 62 of 268 Free: ArTiStKwgtr Ta,

Siatiject: Re: FYI— 5amee a? [liven abed sraeepmnrtsemig bite: )snet)’Ti 5:37:41 PM

FairVew Ivard and the konrad Famly/Croup

Thanks to all who sent as this report aid whio we had goad inertcn s to wTite scone we, 5cggy and Arndt Kruger hopo it’s lot too late to add nu- thoughts about ths issue. It was very rice of the Konrads to host allthe irteested guests but what were their motivations.

As Dl Tepscot: pointed out one is curious why the plans by the Konrao FamZycan’t owrealized as a private seasonal residence The:r insstence that they tcve to have a conmercia: des:gnatior appeers to us somesynat susp:ious. viny woj d they reed such a dewgnaton whe close to hundred percent o lae

TV Va sreoeties a’e resicenhia/seasonal. Tie en!y reason I can slunkof is flat they wart to ‘rake tis proocrty substant:a1.y ore uab e w even saleable once they get trw commercial designation. Whyshoud CL’ support such undertaking. We definitcyoppose such a request from the Kenrud Family/Group. Asit is there is enough activity on our beautiful lake,

The whole story reminds me of a beautiful old family house in Forest Hillwhich used to belong to a grandmother who recently had died. Acouple with two small children showed up to tell the selling son that they absolulely loved this charming old Toronto house, this was exactly what they were looking for and it was the perfect home for their small family. They got the house and promptly tore it down to replace it witisa much larger one which they sold soon after. As it turned out they were clever developers. Peggy and ArndeKruger

from: mc Tarscott Sent: May 19,2017 4.1 29 AM

Subject:SE FYI Samm”y of Fairview lslatd Deve’opn’e—.t Mcci t

Itells Vegas Ar nary andDavis:

I — I’dliketo add my thanks foryour summary. MywifeSharon Solomonand Ialse attended the little meeting in Huntsvilleand agree with you the Konrads make a for terrificfirst impression.Istillhave a few questions, but the one out of the gale concerns ehe zoning.The Konrads,as you note, are dencribinga private use family and friends to includetmptoyees, The proiect looksreallyattractive and nestled inthe forest. Myquestion Isunder the existingaostn wouldthey not be able to go ahead with their intended use? Whyistheir offer to purchase contingent on obtainingan amendment lea commercialclassof zoning KirstinMaxwell(on this liss(

advisedme that the onlyother property on the lakewith the ITSzoning isBritannialodge. Fairviewand Brisanniaare likeapples and oranges tome. Ihave ether questions stillbut the firstishow does the current zoningconstrain their plansto the point of makingit a deal breaker? Best regards, DIIITapntote,

From:Megan Whirtingham Sent: May15, 201? 133 AM To:

— — —

Subject: RE:FYi—SsamnaryofFairviewIsanc DevelopmentMee:irg

Mary thara for this ‘entr,

From:AnthonyWtuttingtiam Sent: Thursday,May18,201.76 3a PM

Subject:Fl — Summaryof FzrrviewIslandDevelopmentMeeting

R.enfl an FAtRUIEW ISLANfl InfnmrMion Mceint / Saturday May fl 2057

From: Tens Wh’nfrrham + nayd Isna link rn”napr’ 1

Page 63 of 268 To: FairviewIviundineerecernmmi,nirv

Date 16 May 2017

Thu br.ef note isinten dad nan in’ormar udate--a ro furehe’ commentary —on she FaIrv’ew k’an dpvelnrre n’nrn nueI and the correardirg zoning cnange tide’ reaew by the Tcwr Councilo H/t:su2le

Amidst a Ilu-ry of concerned em] s--and after djscjss 0’s cetween The KocradGrout (Fairvew Is!ar.daroposed Develoners’(,the Lakeof BaysAssociation{LOBe( and oficia’s from the Thv.nnof -ljntsv: a --a Pubrc Meetng ecokpace n tljrlsv e (Active Lea’ni’gCentre lest Snt’rdav mnni’p May II from 9-11am

DavidLang& Iwe’e abo noa::e’d tWameeting as interested cottage’s from Glermount

We o’fcr tr,e ‘claw n - unsolictec - repent:

(NOTEThis 5,0cc inar-ywaya proper - egar dooamar.t — mere.y a 5u’.mary of .mp’essionsoffe’ed for thone not able to attend)

MeetingAttendance sppsoe 30

• Townofficialsleg HuntsvilleChiefPlanner KirstinMacwell) • Developergroup (members of conrad family)+ DukeEngineeringplanningassistants • current FairviewIslandowner (JillLangford) • Interested public

Clovelly Glenmount (includingIan &Sue Kern GloriaWoodnide) N,thgroveRoad The meetingwas “hosted’ bythe developer )Konradfamily)to answer any/allquestions by publicand other lake stakeholders,

Noformal speeches or presentations took place.The devoloparnsaid ahoywere makingshemsolvesavailableto eeplain, clarifyand answer questions. Engagement took place on an Informaladhoc banisamong smallgroups. There was no commontary and/Drguidance from Townofficials.

Wall.aizemaps &charts displayingshe fairviewproject were placed throughout she room.

Tansymorningrefreshments were in good supplyl

The two primary spokespersons 1. CEOGeordle Konrad 2. CFO DavId Konrad (father)

No allempta were made to sell” to virtues of the project. Conversely, no assermpls were made to disparage the proposal.

Summary of key points uttered:

1, Earliestconstruction to take place on Fairviawwillbe 2019. 2 tibia const.--cn on wor< may co-narita S cenagwstyle c-we ns • several ccmrr,on buildings

3. O’enrount RoadANDgovernment wharf w . NOT be used as conslrucsior ama-oft poir.I 4. N.thgrove Rosa private snoreline los (cwnec b-, Larp’o’d far yi V.AYbe uaea as aces’ arch to’ Fa:rvew stern cut NOT fo’ constuctor. V.mnus 5 Conslructionjump-ol’ w be dote by prioragreemet wsth ‘v’ — )cg Bsyuville.°en Cunning:one:c( S AllerV’onmental concerns fullycontemplated &‘igc’o’usivcovered bycovenant 7. Pnoooscdrationale o’ camp’ comsonent of Fairwewpoposai isdeferdcd by

Topnote The atmosphere as the May13 meeting was cordial. The questions were free.flowrng and non.combasive The personal performance of Konrad Group--ted

by 19’year’od Geord;e Konrad & his amab’e OFO(and fatherj David Conrad — gere’a y tspsreO confidence and goodw:l

(One i untration of she develope’u’ Iota sen<5v.t,es : David Konrao oescnbed n wed data me bease:ful biosphere o’ Fairuew stand -- inducing ene Wh:te P,’e acne, she hemlock sone & the Red Oa zone. He derby appreciates and vauen that land.)

In all, a generally go ‘moress on was mace far all cottagera ass those lake stewa’ds concerned with she welfare of Lake ci Says.

NOTE. Fo’ those ron able to ascend tim reefng. she deveopers rave nancoc ed a SECOND public meeting — Saturday 3rd June from 12- 2:00.

Come & ask questions. Meet the players, Esercise your civic rightsl

The scvial debale -. and vole --at HiinlwillpTrrwn mantel Iskec glare WednesdayJune 14 as 09-30cm

Bess regards,

Tony Wblttingham (cottager)

NOTE: Photos attached below. Included are CEOoeordie Konred, See also several valued LOBcommunity guardians.

Anthony Whlttlngham

Page 64 of 268 From: ArndtKruger Sent: June-05-17 2:31 PM To: Tanya Calleja

Subject: Planning Committee: Fairview Island

Clerk’sDepartment, Town Hall, Town of Huntsville Ontario

Re:FairviewIsland development

Dear Ms. Calleja, Please forward this urgent message to the Major, Scott Aitchison, the Chief Planner, Kirstin Maxwelland the Members of the Planning Committee.

Dear Mr. Major, we, Peggyand Arndt Kruger, can’t understand why the potential buyer of the FairviewIsland property needs a zoning change requiring a commercial designation for the intended property. As far as we learned, Britannia Lodge is the only other commercially zoned property within the township. It is difficultto understand why a ‘familycompound’ on FairviewIsland would need a commercial designation. Familymembers and even visiting employees can get together and enjoy the beauty of the lake without a commercial designation, as all of us do on this lake. The question arises what are the real motives of the KonradGroup that they ‘need’ such a commercial designation differing from all other seasonal residential properties on the lake?

It doesn’t take much to guess that a commercial zoning would favour the future owners (KonradGroup) by making the property more valuable or even more saleable. Acommercial zoning opens the door to substantial increase in traffic across the lake and around the island. Willthe island be able to sustain the increased numbers of seasonal residents and is the size of the island and its terrain suitable to deal with the increased sewage? One also wonders

Page 65 of 268 how many old established trees with have to be cut down to provide room for the development.

There are a number of questions unanswered in our view but the principle question is why should the Town grant such a request in the first place, why the exception when it willmean more pressure on our beautiful Lakeof Bays. We oppose the zoning change for Fairview Island and we hope that the Planning Committee and the Town Councilwillreject this request in the end. Peggy and Arndt Kruger

Page 66 ci 268 flees, Danneentuna,. To, fl.i.rtimrnei Srbj.nn, Orroiilt to a,. maCn tote ejina Wand Ott., Jane Oat? ‘cia is en

bear Mt. Maoweli and the Town off lastivi tie,

pro is an My htishan a, amity and I atoms, arm, of nests, lie as owners of a pro priry which is DIRICTLVacross horn Fa,n,,ew stand. I sir properly she so many cottage pettier °eD—i‘tO rtvcralTcfl of oc’ awe. ly ‘iteweart ha, teejght n_tin In. SCcur ‘r.ci aid fwsr Si or aJ,r’t’Q,a’e’s it en’ haven, oc’ptace Saga to wmr4 cite togetbe’ at a la.r.’y. ee’tCTe oc’otstt ectk oat,’ a, meting’ vet. anc:ng art vrjov tan bea’_ey anc peace Tsai :5 ,ahe of Bays

I— •iasssvcse We I docamp’a,a have aate’sded I tamber of nv’nerau:r meet rgt 0’ Iwrite mi behalf of n.y lamdy with. tegad Is tore-ac., re azotcat,crciic_a:ed the to’s, 0’ eeoc-md 5 id ad sb’s matter. the most recer.t of wh cm was hosted b5 the .1cc of Bc5. A::eoctic this east weeer

Eutry rewopponi.r my catty’ O.rC 0 retest art cf t,o,e eecuesi Cf t srr sari ‘ng Isa, Sea_gIst to I get snore a sd mole alarnJig nIamat a icy tha espeet to the pcmchaso’t’ iste’t 095 The inlsrms’.isn r,eecte no mon,’c iron the mt of et sacSs5’g sfam:vcmi— 4 arc xc Is occas,oen ly hots emptuve s,toacoirrve:ool ccl: jets. anelien to rent tue the watt as a StIon corporate reagent or ret ftc leeQe graape ‘edit wJot,nanoi seoa.gtt l:iw_-’a Shis a-rekee.t cc-aura site mte,i’ or, of peocosru eel rosier pot and ‘nng dock ci the rtrarse of collelcuasr.g a raTter o’te. OtraicT IN. kr:cft’neis we Lw‘eve .sm.,,’,itrn cr to ss:rn:oc ci I’ritlr’tet reraliotna COTTAGE enper.eice oct patsy Is. th ert’eatv

the precise reason we have bought and enjoy this space sad re move curse iaes from this kind of raise and cemmorci al activity Approving this Pr aonira woaid ruin the enioyment and iemma of farniy gatherings, rrtuoation and fries that is Se each a part of our take oh Bays eepei,psco Our family lenin strongly thor, heeld this development go ahead, ‘I would hr She havingaMarriatt Rev Lesson (on Lake Rousseau plunked from ottages. Transient occupation oft lie laced car adircladn guests wha do not recetiarii yssder,tar d or respect tire intent of this dmveioprnpnt i down 200 yard, oatc cottage space: titus raining the enjayment oar tighliy knit community has enioyvd far mary years.

like Forth erwe believe tie onera it Insert of this plap it one of a commercial, NCItecreatiorat nature and than It harmfai to ti’s enjaympnt stall connogern on lake of foists and pan’icelar iythose who, us are iocated to ciosety to Fainv,pw, As Odes Hickey bat stated, corporate mt erects kitE lardamettatiy different from private residential omnera.

For .11of theur reanorn, and alter mach contldrranion we faemol4i request that foe and your colfeapues derifor ISle propeaolftr re’attfag. Farther, we rpqae, Cthin correopoedrncelslrcladedat part oft he information package that is forwarded to Town council fortheaanr IC Piannimt Meetieg.

Sincen&y,

The Dowtot Family

Page 67 of 288 From: Sue Barker To: Tanya CaHia: k’tstin Maxw&I;Scott Aitchson Subject: FaiMew Island re-zoning Date: June-04—179:43:54 PM

hello Scott, Kirslcn, and Tanya,

After attending the two open houses and much discussion. we would like to indicate our opposition to the proposcd re-Zoning of Fainiew Island from single family residential use to “insiitutional tourist establishment”. Despite their effoas, there arc conflicting reports from planners, with inconsistencies and discrepancies. and we seem to be unable to get clear answers as to why tIns re-zoning is neeessan’ and its future implications.

One of the reasons We ‘ave such a healthy lake is because of the Ibresiglit and care of institutions like LOBA, the residents and cottagers of Lake of flays and Huntsville, and Uieinsightful planning of both the Huntsville and LOB councils.

We are concerned that development on tins scale and iLsIc-zoning may have a very long lasting impact on the lake without considering the full reach of its effects.

I thank you for your consideration of this

Sincerely, Sue Barker and Ian Karn

Page 68 of 268 From: BobFrank To: KirstinMaxwell; Subject: Fahview Island Re-ZoningApplication Date: June-04-17 4:25:51 PM

Dear Ms. Maxwell,

Below is a letter regarding our family’s opposition to the proposed re-zoning of Fairview Island. Would you kindly circulate it to the appropriate council members in Huntsville and Lake of Bays.

Many thanks,

Bob Frank

To: Kirstin Maxwell

Members of Council

Our family are long-time residents of and we would like to register our objection to the proposed re-zoning / redevelopment of Fairview Island.

The area around Fairview Island has for generations been a quiet residential part of Lake of Bays. The Island is totally unsuited to a commercial venture of this scope.

The Planning Justification Report’ prepared for you on behalf of George Konrad by Marie Poirier and Mr. Konrad’s comments at a public meeting on June 3 provide examples of why this is so. Among them:

1. The Konrad Group Inc. (of which Mr. Konrad is a partner) has over 200 employees and a worldwide list of clients. Renting and loaning of the property to these people is planned. This places a substantial transient element into our residential community.

Page 69 of 268 2. Eight new docks with a total area of 586m2 are proposed. The dock facilities are to be satisfactory for seaplane use by guests. 3 A heliport is noted as part of a possible future. 4. Seminars with up to 40 people on the Island at any onetime. This volume of traffic triggers environmental and safety concerns including the LOB Sailing Club programs. 5. A detailed environmental assessment has not been prepared. For example: • Location and routes for garbage disposal. • Traffic implications for Nithgrove need to be described. • The viability of safely disposing of the effluent related to forty guests needs more detail.

These are some of the reasons that make this development a serious intrusion on a residential community. The lack of specific detail in the Planning Report gives our family additional concern about the direction and intent of the use of the property.

Rezoning Fairview Island as commercial property would be a serious error. We encourage you not to do so.

Sincerely,

Bob Frank

Page 70 of 268 ______

From: Robert Young To: CamDbeIIr hn Cc:

Subject Re: Applition to Rezone Fair-viewIsland Date: June04-17 1:04:50 PM Attachments: PastedGranbic-J .ndf Afl0000i .htm

Mr. Campbell,

Thank you for your email and attached letter - very extensive and inclusive.

As I’msure you are aware, this island is not in the jurisdiction of the Township of Lake of Bays and therefore I can neither approve nor deny this application. No documents have been provided to me (which is normal for a Huntsville application) and therefore I have not read Ms. Poirier’s report. Also, again as you know, the Township of Lake of Bays has not received any applications from the Fairview Island Applicant but rest assured, if and when we do receive an application(s), we will treat it according to our normal procedures and practices.

Regards,

Bob

Bob Young Mayor Lake of Bays Township Township: (705)-635-2272 ext 244 or option 9 Home Office: {705)-635-1 845 Mobile: (705)-571-0657 [email protected] www.lobmavor.ca

Page 71 of 268 From: Bonnie Peebles To: KirstinMaxweI Subject: FaiMew Island re2oning Date: May-31-17 5:53:29 PM Attachments: farview island - Bon&e Peehlec.dpcx

HelloKirstin

Iam a cottage owner at - I have attached a letter in opposition to

the rezoning of FairviewIsland. Iask that you forward it to council. Thank you Bonnie Peebles

Page 72 of 268 May 31, 2017

Ms. Kirstin Maxwell, BA,MCIP,RPP

Manager of Planning Town of Huntsville

37 Main Street East

Huntsville P1H 1A1

Dear Ms. Maxwell,

Re: Proposed Rezoning of Fairview Island, Lake of Bays, from residential to commercial use

, I have a cottage at a few lots just east of the Government Dock. My neighbours

and I have recently learned of the proposal to rezone Fairview Island from residential to commercial use. My reason for writing is to respectfully request that this proposed rezoning of Fairview Island from residential to commercial use not be allowed to proceed.

I have been cottaging on Lake of Bays at this same address for almost 30 years. During that time the lake has become increasingly busy as more people are discovering our beautiful gem. The wonderful flavour and character of our community is a direct result of so many cottagers having strong connections to the lake. We are increasingly aware of how fragile and important our natural heritage is. Rezoning Fairview Island to commercial is very much at odds with this. There are a number of resorts on the lake to accommodate

retreats for companies and Iwould venture they would welcome the business! We come to “the cottage” to relax and recharge and the added noise and traffic associated with a commercial retreat is in direct opposition to what we have all come to expect our cottage experience to be.

In reviewing the proposal it would appear that the business of running the island / retreat has not clearly addressed a number of items that will have a substantial impact on “my” and our community’s cottage experience. In changing the zoning to commercial the door will be open to a very dense building potential,

Page 73 of 268 something Istrongly oppose. Also the day to day business of staff, parking, transportation of goods and

garbage would substantially increase the noise, and traffic, not to mention the guests who have no

connection to our lake nor our community.

In the last couple of days we have heard that the potential purchasers may be planning to use the small

government dock near me to barge the goods back and forth to Fairview needed to build and maintain the

island. This is totally unacceptable. You may note that very recently the strong concern of area residents and

cottagers were successful in pointing out the safety of the public along our stretch of South Portage Road and

you deemed it appropriate to lower the speed limit in this area. This is a small dock that is well used by

public swimmers all summer long. I doubt a barge coming a going will support their enjoyment of the lake!

Besides the use of the dock, the increased boat and barge traffic in our bay will severely hinder our

enjoyment and the health of our precious lake. In recent years I have seen a substantial increase in marine

traffic in our bay and often with no regard of the docks and cottages along the shore. The water is calmer so

it becomes a magnet for water sports which creates shoreline and dock damage not mention trying to enjoy

paddling a canoe or kayak or the safety of swimmers. Adding to this already growing problem with barges

and transportation of island guests is of great concern.

I respectfully request that this application for a rezoning from residential to commercial not be granted.

I ask that you please forward this letter to the members of the Town Council.

Yours sincerely

Bonnie Peebles

Page 74 of 288 From: BrianGibbings To: KirstinMaxwell subject: RezoningProposal for FaiMew Island Is. Date: June-06-17 3:24:35 PM Attachments: Petition to Town of HuntcvillpPlanner7JnO6F.DOCX

Dear Kirsten,

As enclosed, 37 names set to this petition; of those canvassed, I found not one in favour of Rezoning.

We petition that the Rezonino Prooosal be reiected by Planning on 06.14.17. In the plternatiye. we petition deferral at that time for further study and for consideration at a meeting in the Fall of ZfliL

Yours truly,

Brian Gibbings

Page 75 of 268 Petition to Town of Huntsville Planner, Mayor and Council

This Petition is delivered in contemplation of the meeting June 14, 2017 to consider a Rezoning Proposal for Fairview Island from SR4.

For this purpose, the undersigned warrants he represents a large majority view of certain affected Nithgrove area ratepayers and other Lake of Bays area residents whose names appear in the list below. Each person whose name is set forth in this Petition has been referenced verbally or in writing or electronically (e-mail) confirming status.

We petition that the Rezoning Proposal be rejected by Planning on 06.14,17. In the alternative, we petition deferral at that time for further study and for consideration at a meeting in the Fall of 2017.

The three principal reasons for petitioning rejection or deferral of the Rezoning Proposal are as follows:

1. the Konrad/Poirier/Duke Engineering proposal is lacking in sufficient detail and exposition to warrant such a far- ranging change in zoning from residential to a form of commercial, CS3.

- Access point for construction (binding arrangements with Marinas) not defined

- Construction staging (ferrying, barging, schedules) of the development not determined nor described

- Mainland Parking arrangements and boat mooring for when the development is fully operational as commercial not addressed

- the license agreement cited in the Rezoning Proposal for residential only parking on Nithgrove Drive for the Konrads is inconclusive; whether binding to limit road parking at Nithgrove Road and Nithgrove Drive is undetermined

- absence of a thorough-going environmental assessment of the Rezoning Proposal

- permitted development of Faiiview under existing zoning SR4 as residential for the use a family compound has not been considered by the proponents

2. Nithgrove residents and other area residents contiguous to the development, (namely Kerrimur Road, Wahawin, Glenmount, Grandview, Clovelly Point, Crown Is., Roothog Is.) and interested party organizations (being Lake of Bays Association, Lake of Bays Heritage, Tennis Club, Sailing Club) require more and adequate time for careful study and submissions including hiring of planners and legal representation.

- Information meetings with the proponents have not answered the issues in 1. above.

- discrepancies between Poirier’s Rezoning Proposal and the Konrad information sessions

- Confirmation of CR4 or variance therefrom should thus be held in abeyance pending this critical input.

3. With 0MB stepping back and more responsibility devolving on the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, it is prudent and in the interests of local officials to give the Rezoning Proposal the most thoughtful and rigorous review.

Dated at Toronto, this _6th_, day of June 2017 as a true and accurate tally below.

Brian Gibbinqs,

Page 76 of 268 In Favour of Rejection or Deferral of Zoning Change of FaiMew is. at June 14,2017 Planning Committes of Hunwille Council

E-mail Contact LillyBarnes Terry Creighton Bruce Creighton KarynButt Susan Truscott Elizabeth B.Lane Paul Shoniker Pamela (Cooper) Bowen Alan Bowen Sharron Grant Alexa Grant Ferris Grant Aaron Grant Kate Doyle Rob Doyle Wendy and Gord Duncan Annie Turner Peggy Clarke Ian MacGregor Ellen Daniel John Peterson Carol Peterson Donald Montgomery Tom Cronin Kathryn Cronin Brian Gibbings Barbara Gibbings Caroline Mandell Sarah Kerr Martha Merle Carole Roup Helen Carla Lanzara BillBrennan [email protected] Richard Campbell TracyCampbell

Dan Amour in his personal caoacity

B Not Supporting Rejection or Deferral of Zoning Change of FaiMew Is. atiune 14,2017 Planning CommUtes of Huntvllle Council

None

C Abstain

Intheir Personal Capacities (Non Voting at Huntville Council) [email protected] RYoung@1akeof Ex,yson cal’ [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Ca [email protected] Did Not Respond

In theirPersonal Capacities (Non Voting at Huntville Council)

BRass@1akeof bays .0 n- ca

Page 77 of 268 From: MacLellan,Bruce To: KirstinMaxspII Cc: Subject: FafrviewIsland Concerns Date: June-04-17 12:34:30 PM

June 4, 2017

Ms. Kirstin Maxwell Planning Department Town of Huntsville

By e-mail: Kirstin.Maxwelkhuntsyille.ca

Re: Fairview Island

We are homeowners on and wish to object to the current proposal to alter zoning and develop Fairview Island on Lake of Bays. We see many problems with the proposal after attending the June 3 open house in Huntsville.

Overall, we oppose the change to the islands zoning from seasonal residential to commercial. The application and supporting documents do not justify the change in terms of policy, environmental impact and land use impacts on the character of the lake.

This island is currently owned by one family with mainland access from Nithgrove Road, where they have approval to park a maximum of 12 cars. There is a license required from Township of Lake of Bays for this parking, but it is not referenced or disclosed in the application. The proposal also alludes to access via local marinas, but those same marinas already do not have enough capacity for parking. One such marina (Haystack Bay) has an unapproved proposal to Lake of Bays Township to expand parking for current demand, before this Fairview Island proposal.

The planning report submitted with this application is filled with errors and flawed conclusions. The previous camp operator did not buy the land from the Crown, but from an individual who had owned it for decades. In the 120 years since European settlement, it was a Christian Camp for about 20 years. There are no legal rights to a commercial use. The island was once an unzoned camp but that use ended and the buildings have been left to decay and collapse.

Permitted coverage in the SR4 zone is 5%. Permitted coverage in a commercial zone is 30%. We are concerned that the proponent intends to expand the island density as their business expands, hosting staff and client events, without adequate understanding of the stress and impact for the surrounding community. The applicant has said they plan to rent the island to clients but as recently as their June open

Page 78 of 268 house, have refused to answer questions about frequency or numbers.

The provision of emergency services to an intensive island use is also an issue that requires study. It is not addressed in the proposal. The local volunteer fire department owns one small boat.

The sewage treatment plan for an expanding commercial use is also not adequately addressed. The island has steep, rocky hills that rise to the centre. A tertiary system will be needed but supporting documents have no details.

This 21.38 acre island is located entirely within a neighbourhood zoned as residential. It is contrary to good planning practice to drop a commercial entity into the midst of such a community.

We hope that the staff and Council of Huntsville will reject this application for Fairview Island. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Karen Girling & Bruce MacLellan

Mailing address:

Page 79 of 268 From: CarolPeterson To; Town Callela: ICrctinMaxwell Subject: Proposalto change zoning on Fairview t&snd Date: Ju.ie-04-177:35:51PM

Tanya Calleja Municipal Clerk for the Town of Huntsville

Kirstin Maxwell Manager of Planning for the Town of Huntsville

Dear Kirstin and Tanya,

I was at the meeting yesterday, Saturday, June 3, at which the project to change the zoning on Fainiew Island was explained by the potential owners. It was an excellent opportunity to hear abnut their plans. As a result of this meeting, I must write to you and kindly ask you to not allow the change in zoning to take pace. It is clear to me that the petitioners view this purchase as an opportunity to enhance their business activities. The fact that the oiler is conditional upon the zoning change, to me, is clear enough indication of their intentions. Isee no commitment to ofibring a retreat for fomily and friends. Therefore, I object to thcir plans for development which are in direct conflict with life on the Lake of Bays as 1see it. We are cottagers who conic to Lake of Bays to escape the business world and relax in the quiet and peace of the lake. There is no place for two entrepreneurs to build housing and provide services for their young staff and clients. In my opinion, the extent to which the island could he developed is an intrusion and a burden on the land and on the lake. We must allow the area to remain as pristine as we can for ourselves and future generations. This is possible only by keeping the zoning residential.

Please take my thoughts and wishes into consideration and kindly hring to the attention of the Council members.

Regards, Carol Peterson

Page80 of268 From: caroline konarzewskl To: Tanya Callela; KirstinMaelI Cc: Subject: Fairview Island Zoningand Deyelopment Proposal Date: June-05-17 3:50:20 PM

I hilly support the Fairview Island Zoning and Development Proposal.

Caro[inc Konarzewski

Page 81 o(268 From: CathyLewis To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: FaMew IslandRedevelopmentProposal Date: June-03-1711:45:20AM

Further to my email of May 3,2017, please accept this enmil as notice of our objection to the above-noted development and proposed amendment to the Official Plan.

We write in objeclion 10 this proposal. We are owners of which is the island immediately south of Fairview Island.

The proposed re-development will interfere with our quiet enjoyment of our Island property due to increased motor boat traffic, noise and lighting at night. It will also interfere with our quiet enjoyment of our other 2 properties on

the south shore of Lake of Bays ( ) which look out onto Fairview Island. Increased motor boat traffic from the Nithgrove Rd landing point will pass in front olall 3 of our Lake of Bays properties.

Please inforni the Town of Huntsville Planning Committee of our concerns.

Thank you.

Cathy and Simon Lewis

Page 82 of268 From: To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: FairviewIsland Lakeof Bays Date: June-06-17 5:15:01 PM

Kirstin: We are opposed to the re-zoning on Fairview Island.

Chris and BillMacklem

Please include this with others of

Thanks for attention.

Page 83 of 268 COMPRISING -THE FORMER TOWNSHIPS OF FRANKLIN MCLEAN RIDOUT SNCLAIRAIO FINLAYSON JILhc’c/ P137j’ RR#1T1012 DWIGHT/ BEACH RD., DWIGHT PHONE (705)635-2272 FAX (705) 635-2132 MUSKOKA,ONTARIOPOAIHO

June 6, 2017

Tanya Calleja, Clerk Town of Huntsville 37 Main Street East Huntsville, ON P1H 1A1

Dear Ms. Calleja:

RE: Official Plan Amendment Application (OPA#13) Zoning By-lawAmendment Application (Z/22/2017/THE) Island No. 2 (Fairview Island)

The Township of Lake of Bays has received a Notice of Complete Application and Public Meeting for the above noted application.

Planning staff has reviewed the OfficialPlan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications and have concerns with the approval of these applications, specifically in regards to access, as it is located within the Township of Lake of Bays.

Application

The proposed amendment to the Huntsville Official Plan and Zoning By-law is to enable the development of an institutional tourist establishment. The subject lands are located within the Town of Huntsville, however access to the property is within the Township of Lake of Bays.

The proposed application is to change the OfficialPlan designation of the lands from Waterfront to a Special Policy Waterfront Area, and rezone the lands from Shoreline Residential Four (SR4) to an Institutional Camp (CS3) zone. Access to the island would be through commercial marinas for the private institutional camp use and through a lot on Nithgrove Road for the accessory residential component.

The applicant proposed Official Plan Amendment (OPA#13), states that mainland access to the Island for the residential and camp component of the use willbe from a Waterfront Landing and related back lot located on Nithgrove Road in Lake of Bays known as Parts 1 and 2 on Plan 35R-24035 and Part I on Plan 35R-7135 respectively.

MUSKOKA. The La8&Yëth&s and sunny Waters.

lot

foot

lots

of The

that

and

serving

land

fewer

the

property

private

site

and

landings

waterfront

are

Official

point

sufficient

use.

private

Lake

by-law.

shoreline

the

facility

purpose

This

use

Ontario

access

docking

for

establishment,

Plans

lands

well

this

Bays

have

the

The

the

access

adequate

for

waterfront

zoning

mainland

not

point

islands.

water

commercial

marinas,

development

docking

tourist

Official

subject

proposed

the

for

Lake

the

point

adequate

Township

2012.

mainland

that

does

for

and

(WR-E265).

spaces,

the

access

mainland

where

and

14,

the

defined

development

the

including

approved

where

access

states

facilities

municipal

facility

commercial

that institutional

properties,

owner

parking

property

parking

March

private

was

Township 2

which

Plan

Exception

mainland

both

water.

permitted

Huntsville on

the

located

of three

268

requirements

states

an by

the

docking

secured

docking properties,

permitted

through

mainland

letter,

property

point, Bays

mainland

use,

Official

effect

are

will

Road,

and

with

individual

and

8ays

this

as the

Page

Town

H.28

access

and

may

maximum

minimum

serves

lands.

required

provided

access

the

Lake

accessible

Plan

maximum

By-law

serve

islands,

parking

facilities parking

be the

Lake

point

force

for

Huntsville

water

was

Nithgrove

permit

which

only

Section

properties.

commercial

Residential

access

within

attached

subject

secured

full

may

meet

Plan

Official

Zoning

area

cannot

are

individual

parking

By-law

access

for

the

are

serving

including

was

mainland

water

mainland

facility,

Town

point

Township

that

located was

Bays

paint

properties.

residential

and

islands

Township

Official

that

residential

amendment

the

only

parking

the

Waterfront

Town.

Township.

points

Zoning

and

the

apply

rezoned

frontage

facilities

access,

amendment,

parking

three

access

the

permits

with

defines

access

Lake

and

states

Island

docking

zoning

amendment

private

properties

including

and

Board

through defined

access

lots

water

Huntsville

zoned

H.27 H.30

8.4.3

zoning

four

Plan parking

By-laws

by-law

This

four

and

further

only

proposed

by-law

Fairview

individual

for

docking

maximum

Official

Plan Bays, residential

Zoning Section landing provides a

accessed individual Municipal an

satisfaction Section properties Section specific area proposed

shoreline satisfaction or dock.

commercial serving

a Township zoning

Town vehicle

Township The

with this As Concerns

As stated, the property at Nithgrove Road is not zoned for a waterfront landing. A waterfront landing is defined as the use of land as a docking and parking facility, which serves as a mainland access point for a commercial property or 4 or more residential properties that are accessible by water, but which does not include vessel or vehicle sales or rental or service, or the sale of fuel. By this definition, the proposed development would require a waterfront landing to provide access.

Staff is concerned with the findings of the applicants submitted Planning Report, conducted by Marie Poirier Planning &Associates, dated April2017, and the applicants submitted Preliminary Servicing Report, conducted by Duke Engineering, dated April4, 2017. These reports refer to the mainland access on Nithgrove Road as a waterfront landing and the back lot on Nithgrove Road as providing additional parking areas, and private ground transportation to shuttle guests to a variety of public access points and public marinas. The applicant is also proposing a formal license to provide for continued access and parking rights. The mainland access on Nithgrove Road and the existing back lot are not zoned to permit access or parking areas required for the proposed development, and staff requires further information on the intent and purpose of the proposed formal license for access and parking rights.

The Township of Lake of Bays is of the opinion that this application is premature prior to dealing with the issue of access to the island. It is our position that the existing individual access point does not allow mainland access for the proposed commercial use of the island, public access points are not appropriate for this scale of use and limited information has been provided to support that adequate parking spaces are currently located at commercially operating marinas.

Staff is requesting that a Parking Justification Report be submitted to the Town of Huntsville and circulated to the Township of Lake of Bays for review. This report would address the required parking rates for this use to determine whether adequate docking and vehicle parking facilities are secured by the property owner on the mainland to meet Section 8.4.3 c) of the Town of Huntsville OfficialPlan, as the proposed mainland access on Nithgrove Road can not be used for this development. Alternatively, ifthe applicants are proposing Nithgrove Road as mainland access then consultation with the Township of Lake of Bays is required.

In conclusion, the Township of Lake of Bays requires the following information:

1. that the Planning Report, conducted by Marie Poirier Planning &Associates, dated April2017 and the Preliminary Servicing Report, conducted by Duke Engineering, dated April4, 2017 be updated to remove reference to Nithgrove Road as an existing waterfront landing and back lot for additional parking areas;

Page 86 of 268

above:

Bays,

the

required

determine

through

Lake

through

owner

reference

purpose

parking,

required

facilities,

any

rights

parking,

and

Bays.

Township

property

applications

rate;

the

Bays

required

the

parking

remove

intent

parking

for

Lake

required

the

required

parking

and

for

Lake vehicle

268

on used

Huntsville

and

revised

Road

secured reviewed

used

and

access

use

required

be are

Page

for

this

information

must

Planning,

Township

docking

Nithgrove

Report,

proposed

the

license

Report,

providing

further

reports

not

proposed

with

RPP

point

adequate

use,

formal

Manager

that

MCIP,

Road

Justification

Road

appropriateness

and

submitted

Justification

access

all

proposed

Maxwell,

proposed

submission

consultation

the

f/T’

Planning

Parking

•

the

Parking

Nithgrove

Markham,

a mainland;

the

confirmation if

for above, Kirstin

individual

truly,

Director

Yours Melissa cc: ______

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LAKE OF BAYS BY-LAW 11-89

BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW 04-180 KNOWN AS THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT BY-LAW(Langlord & Lalor)

WHEREASit Isdeemed expedient to amend By-law04-180.

NOW ThEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Lake of Bays enacts as follows:

Schedule A” to By-law 04-180 as amended, is hereby further amended by re designating Pan of Lot 3, ConcessIon 11, McLean Ward, now in the Township of Lake of Bays, from the Waterfront ResIdentIal (WR)”DevelopmentPermit Area to the “Waterfront ResIdentIal with an Exception (WR-E265’ Development Permit Area shown on the attached Schedule “B”. a Section 7 of By-law04-180 be amended by the additionof the Following:

On lands designated “WR-E265”, as shown on Schedule W attached to By law 11-89, no person shall use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure except in accordance with the Waterfront Residential (WR) Development Permit Area designation permitted uses and amended by the followIng:

a) Notwithstanding any provisions withinDevelopment Permit By-lawNo. 04-180, the removal of any vegetation on the lot willnot be permitted except for the construction of a driveway, parking area and pathway to access the shoreline as Identifiedon Schedule B attached to By-law 11-59 and/or the removal of any dead, diseased or vegetation posing a hazard to people or property.

b) Notwithstanding any provisions withinDevelopment Permit By-lawNo. 04-ISO, a Development Permit must be received prior to any development on the subject lands in accordance with Sections 4.85 and 4.86.

c) Despite the requirement of Section 4.20, the subject lot shall be developed provided that there is a minimum of 808 square metres of lot area and IS metres of water frontage.

d) Despite the requirement of Section 4.59, the maximum number of parkIng spaces on the lot shall be 2.

e) Despite the requirement of Section 4.64 c), the maximum length of a dock shall be 12 metres (40 feet) from the shoreline.

0 Substituted Development Permit Designation Provisions:

I) MAXIMUMSHORELINEACVVIf AREA COVERAGE

SITUATION STANDARD STAFF CDUNCIL I VARIATIDNVARIATIONJ

lAD 23% I None None I

3. Schedules “A”&“B”hereby formpad of this By-law.

4. Allother provisionsof By-law04-180,as amended, shall apply.

Presented to the Ontario Municipal Board on Febwarj 29, 2012 forming part of the Settlement Agreement for Ontario MunicipalCase No. PL 110983.

Y1L Ordered to be in (till fame and effect on: k/AreA , 2Q12

Z10111LOB(Langlord&talc,) Poll No.040-014-05800 CivicAddress:vacant—NlthgmveRoad Page 88 of 268 Lake Bays Gnndvlaw of 1 Lake

Lake

11-89

No.

‘if “A” 040-01405800 4 4 -

No .1 Roll LpB

Langlord

Amendment SCHEDULE (vacant) * 18111. -Tborna

Drive By-law Nithgrove Appllcatlon::Z Applicant $VDJrQT.t3NP.S. I.

-—--OriginalMessage—-- From: infocsolutionsgroup.ca [maiho:infoesolutionsgroupcaj On Behalf Of Sent: June-01-17 6:30 PM To: Tanya Calleja Subject: Fairview island development

Good Day. My name is Cathy Cronin, President of the Lake of Bays Tennis Club at 1113 Glenmount Road (Glenmount Dock is at the foot of our road and the closest public dock to fairvicw). lam writing as the development on Fairview Island has the potential to impact Glenmount Dock, Glenmount Road and thus, our club and the community at large.

Let me provide a little background to give you context. The Lake of Bays Tennis Club has existed for 40+ years and has over 120 membership Ihniilies, all with property on Lake of Bays. We are an inexpensive, volunteer run club that offers kids programs, adult events and member access to courts from May to October. We have our own private roadidriveway and parking lot that keeps cars out of sight and off Glenmount Road. The tennis club is a contributor to the spirit of community on Lake of Bays.

Our concern with the Fairview development is the use of Glenmount Dock as a staging or fenying location for the “corporate retreat” events. We understand that Glenmount Dock is in the township of bike of Bays and Fairview Island is in the township of HunsLville. We are asking you to consider the impacts on all sides of the island.

We are concerned about our driveway/road and added traffic. Our concerns specifically are:

Greater traffic, commotion around the dock where kids and bouts are a constant in the summer. A significant safety issue.

2. Buses or vehicles that will park or drop off at Glenmount Dock; blocking or congesting our driveway

3. Vehicles that will use our driveway/road as a turn-around method, causing damage and increasing vehicle to vehicle interaction

4. Vehicles that may park illegally in our lot

Beyond our concerns for the club, we arc concerned for the Lake of Bays community - the impact the rezoning would cause on increased noise levels, boat traffic, boat safety, shoreline impacts.

We would like to request that the application be denied

Page 91 of 268 Origin: http://w.huntsvifle.ca/cnftownhaTl/mcewourcnunciflnrs.nsn

This email was sent to you by Cathy Cronin > through http:/Anvwhunicviflcca/.

Page 92 ci 268 From: Dan ShUt To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: Fairviewrezoningrequests Date: June-05-172:47:22PM

Dear Ms. Maxwell:

My wifeand I are residents of . and rate payers of the Town of Huntsville. I personally been spending a portion ofeach year at this property since 1951. Our entire fatuity considers this property on Lake of Bays something very special.

For a variety of reasons, most of which have been voiced numerous times by others, we are OPPOSED to the rezoning of Fairview Island. We believe that the current zoning status in conjunction with the Town of Huntsville building peniit process gives the potential purchaser numerous opportunities to “improve’ their property while maintaining the character oIthis portion olLake of Bays which ‘ye value so highly.

Thank you Foryour consideration in this matter.

Please include this correspondence as part of the official record for this rezoning request. pan and Audrey Shill

Page 93 of 268 From: DanielBarnes To: KfrstinMaxwell Subject: Submission - Rezoningof Fairvew Island Date: June-06-17 10:14:31 AM

Daniel Barnes

Dear Ms. Maxwell,

I am a summer resident of Nithgrove Road LOB Township. My properly, , abuts the Faiiwiew Island Access Point on Nithgrove Drive.

lam writing you with concerns regarding the proposed Rezoning of Fairview Island from CR4 to CS3.

I have familiarized myself with the proposed development plan as prepared by Duke Engineering for The Konrad family.

There are a number of crucial points that need to be addressed, before allowing such a development to proceed could be

considered good governance, in my opinion. By good governance I mean “green lighting” a plan that is based in Th1 with limitations that suit the region, that include the interests of constituents and stewardship of the natural environment into councils considerations on this Rezoning application.

The developer/Konrads claims their plan returns the Island to it’s “original and historic” use. This is a false claim. I’ll leave it to council and lawyers to argue these details. I’ll mention here that concerned citizens have hired legal council who will be present at the June 14th meeting in Huntsville.

The Konrad family’s claim that the corporate retreat proposed is meant for “family use” and is a “camp” is inconsistent with the proposed development They state it clearly, it will be for rent. The extensive building and capacity proposed (with option for HeliPad), make it clearly a Resort development. The Konrads will not specify how much of the time the Island will be rented out, or used privately or act as a corporate retreat for their family business. Their proposal is simply open ended. The number and size of structures and docks with the capacity to house up to 50 people, far out way any “family use” claim. I-lowcan they invest this much without looking for a commercial return? This is simply ridiculous.

The creation of a resort on Faiiwiew island with the resultant increase in boat traffic, garbage creation, noise and light pollution will have a negative impact on the natural and rural tone of the lake. The rural tone is why my family bought there. Has there been an environmental assessment of this development? My understanding is there has not. And that once there is, it will be clear, the Island and region cannot handle such a development as proposed.

There is no secure plan in place to accommodate access point traffic either by boat or car. From where do these corporate groups depart? How is their parking accommodated? Though the Konrads have reached out to Marinas with their plans, there is nothing formal sorted. If things don’t work out elsewhere I expect the piece of land they would own, the access point on Nithgrove, becomes their best option. That would require another by-law change which we’ve learned is not so hard to get, even in the face of considerable opposition. It would spell disaster for our little Nithgrove community. It would be thoroughly inappropriate for our rural cottaging community to be expected to accommodate the level of activity associated with the building and or running of such an “Institutional Camp” which in reality is a resort.

Page 94 of 268 It is of utmost importance that this rezoning be critically assessed and therefore held for further study.

Furthermore, 1don’t think a development of this scope is welcome by residents in the region.

Ms. Maxwell, Thereby request that you include this letter in the information package that is being forwarded to Town Council in preparation for the June 14th Planning Meeting.

Thank You, Daniel Barnes.

Page 95 cr268 ______

From: To: KirstinMaeII Cc: Subject: FaIMew Island development Date: June-07-17 11:23:17AM

Dear Kirstin, We wish to add our names to those opposed to the by-law re the development of Fafiwiew Island. We object to the plans on several grounds: - Environmental - no adequate assessment - Access - no established access for such a large project - Proposed zoning change - not necessary to do what the Konrads say they want to do Kindly add this to the material given to your councilors prior to next week’s meeting. Thank you, David and Karen Sutherland and family

Page 96 of 268 From: David Bennett To: P1a’,n; KirsfinMaxwell;Ir Cc:

Subject: Proposed re-zoning of Fairview Island, Lake of Bays Date: June-06-17 10:29:21 PM

June 5, 2017

Town of Huntsville Planning Dept. Attn. Kirstin Maxwell, Manager of Planning CCTanya Calleja, Manager of Legislative Services CCTownship of Lake of Bays CCLake of Bays Association CCLake of Bays Heritage Foundation

Subject: The proposed Official Plan Amendment (OPA#13) and Zoning By-LawAmendment (Z/22/2017/THE) regarding Fairview Island, Lake ol Bays.

Dear Ms. Kirstin, We are writing regarding the proposed re-zoning of Fairview Island, Lake of Bays, and proposed Commercial Development on same.

We are disturbed by the rush to make a decision on the proposed amendments as there seems to be many unanswered questions regarding the proposals. In the information sessions it is obvious that the Konrads and their planner Marie Poirier are not on the same page. They are anxious to rezone Fairview as Commercial when it seems to many of us and our advisors who have extensive planning experience that they can achieve what they want under the Residential Zoning with a few simple Variances. We are against any change in Zoning for this property.

Furthermore, we are opposed to any sort of central building with 8÷ bedrooms as it seems unnecessary to achieve their goal of a retreat for their family members and a perk / reward to their business associates and employees. The development on the island should be limited to the? or 8 residences that it seems a residential zoning would allow.

There hasn’t been any concrete explanation or binding agreements that would allow the Konrads to transport building materials, heavy construction equipment, guests, etc. to the island without relying on the mainland property on Nithgrove Drive. We all find it hard to believe that supply shipments and guests would be directed to Marinas on the north or east ends of the lake when closer access is available at Nithgrove.

Ifthe development is allowed to proceed the Konrads should be required to obtain a mainland access point in a more appropriate location in Huntsville territory, rather than Nithgrove Drive.

Page 97 of 268 In addition, iffor some reason this was allowed to proceed there should be a stipulation that the Managed Forrest on Fairviewremain in perpetuity.

We all pride ourselves on the condition of “our” lake that we strive so hard to take care of so everyone can enjoy it. We are upset at the thought of 50-60 “guests” partying on Fairviewto the early hours of the morning. To suggest as the Konradsdid that this would never happen is ridiculous.

Ata minimum, these proposed changes need to be deferred until the fallso that the summer residents that willbe most affected come up to the lake and can have their say. That would also allowthe Konradstime to investigate doing their project under the residential Zoningthat exists presently.

Our preferred course of action isthat the property remain as ResidentialZoningand that their plans be reduced in scale to allowsame under the Residentialzoning with only minor Variances.

Yourstruly,

David& LindaBennett

Page 98 of 268 From: Deborah To: KirstinMaxwell Subject: Fwd: Faliview Island RezonIng- HIGHIMPORTANCE Date: June-05-17 2:09:28 PM

Dear Ms. Maxwell &the Town of Huntsville —

I would like to formally state my opposition to the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island.

We are residents of Huntsville since 1978 and have raised our family in this community of cottages. We have developed our own neighborhood association called Clovelly Point Cottages Association (CPCA) and we collectively resolve issues with our neighbors on many levels as well as hold our own Regatta and Social, Annual meeting, etc. Our connection to Huntsville and Lake of Bays is THE most important part of our family life and financial investment. We are located directly across from Fairview Island on LOB and we are firmly opposed to the proposed REZONING TO CS3 INSTITUTIONAL CAMP TOURIST ESTABLISHMENT. You will also hear from our CPCA that we have an overwhelming majority of OPPOSED MEMBERS.

We believe that the proposed plan threatens our community on multiple levels:

1. Negative impact to the natural beauty, aesthetics, etc. 2. Introduces environmental risks (Water quality, natural ecology, regional wildlife) 3. Negative impact to the community culture: o Our relationships with our neighbors is a massive part of our enjoyment of Huntsville o Corporate interests are fundamentally different than those of private residential owners 4. Sets a precedent for commercialization of residential areas and environmentally unique geographies 5. Introduces the risk of high-turnover ‘weekenders” — short term rentals, summer adult camps, transient guests with no relationship our community to uphold and protect the quality of our LOB lifestyle, etc. 6. This transient visitor lifestyle was routed out of Bigwin Island many years ago with proper sales of Private Ownership and is now a very respectable community of neighbors with a well organized infrastructure to handle the island access for parking vehicles, garbage removal and ferry service to reduce traffic of private watercraft and respect for the quality of LOB. 7. Introduces the riskof incremental commercializationand corporate development

We believe that allowing this rezoning would drastically reduce our property value and our neighbors properties too.

Upon much consideration, we ask that you decline this proposal for rezoning. Please include this correspondence as part of the information package that is forwarded to Town Council for the June 14th Planning Meeting. Please feel free to contact us should you have any need.

Page 99 of 266 Respectfully,

Deborah and Patrick 1-lickey

Page 100 of 268 From: Dennis Wiiks To: Kirstin MayweW Subject: FAIRVIEWISLAND---propased rezoning Date: June-06-17 8:36:31 PM Attachments: 06-06-2017 08;19;2JPM.JPG

Hi Kirstin I am opposed the the proposed zoning changes and request that you please copy each of the members of council on my attached letter, prior to the meeting on June 14th. If you have any questions, will you pLeasecall me. Many thanks Deniii s

Page 101 of 268 HAROLD G. ELSTON

Barrisccr 6 Solicitor (ntcgrhy Comtnissinncr I

November 2, 2017

SENTBYEMAIL:[email protected]

Chair Alcockand Members of Planning Committee Town of Huntsville, Town Hall 37 Main Street East Huntsville, ON P1K 1A1

Dear Chair Alcockand Members of Planning Committee:

Re: Proposed Development of Fairview Island, Lake of Bays — OPA No. 13 and Z/22/201 7/HTE

Asyou know, Iact for a group of residents on Lakeof Bayswho are concerned about the proposed

redevelopment of Fairview Island. I would like to take this opportunity to provide a brief response to the new materials from Ms. Poirier, which were submitted to you by Mr. Longo on October 24, 2017.

Regarding Ms. Poirier’s Land Use Character Compatibility Analysis — Comparison 1: Current Developments on Lake of Bays, with respect, while an interesting exercise documenting the historic, existing development of three communities on the lake (together with a very general description of Lake of Bays), the comparison is exceedingly simplistic, and fails to address the detailed and thoughtful policy review and analysis which Mr. Lehman and Ms. Menzies have provided to you. In our respectful submission, this comparison of a few, select criterion as between the existing cottage properties and the proposed commercial tourist establishment misses the point entirely, and falls well short of the kind of planning justification needed by the Committee, before it could possibly lend its support to the development.

Moreover, and, again, with respect to Ms. Poirier, the document called Comparison 2: Fairview Island Developed os Residential is equally unhelpful. The analysis fails to provide any details or discussion as to how the land might be subdivided, ignores the Planning Act and Official Plan tests which would need to be satisfied, and, in comparing Fairview as residential to Fairview as commercial, omits any reference to the impact of the introduction of a commercial resort on the surrounding communities. It is, at best, a hypothetical exercise which does nothing to address the very real land use planning concerns which my clients and their planners have raised, particularly for a prominent island property, which serves as a common and central feature of several neighbouring lakeside communities, visible and audible to most of the southern portion of the lake,

First Szrcco Suirc 306 Collingwnod, ON L9Y 1B3 705.443.8183 F. 393 I 705.443.8602 I t I [email protected] HAROLD EL S ION COOl at of or has the you new plan must same not future to new it is over troubling applicant the presented. position considered any official at Poirier. neighbouring the merit be re-assess to the application the anything provided deeply Ms. the and, applicant in any is by and by the we see discussions, previously The use reached, properly itself have not impact that and prejudice to the review which been do planning, find clarified provided will been must it as we has with target not good application. have by-law what process meetings how describe Use, even what constantly for of to now to and should do, moving permissions many approach. certain to zoning ELSTON of, to may planning the application, represents the and Town a similar after is LS1QN.orn draft its is struggling E

wants G. permission consist the for cautious required which Clarification it about Lb the a that, still policies, will RU be and is described says fact that HA point, submissions. important it adopt Provide is description applicant; The abandoned to plans, public to appreciate, concerned planning what these the the its believe properly applicant certain what the to do will are Town have a by to development resort. the HAROLD fact, to out, At to the Town’s In evolve the Berlis should Information clients for sought tourist the attention Aird continue what months, thought submission, my piece. Committee applicant need we your proposals. Neither well this the the considered changes Longo, the a truly, note, for in Additional continuously Elston several imagine As addresses to be commercial Leo of G. event, to to respectful you the very a allows final zoning signals a for be any our In become. respond In properly Harold and liberty having As clarifying, As and should applications. Yours to course community. development cc. time, Thank -Original Message- From: infoesolutionsgroup.ca [maiIto:info@esolutionsgroupc] On Behalf Of Sent: September-11-17 9:53 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: oppose rezoning fairview Island

I am the owner of a property which we use year round on Lake of Bays. I strongly oppose the proposed rezoning of

Fairview Island. I believe the proposal before council does not conform to the wishes of the community, nor do the

proposed changes reflect an acceptable use of the property. I urge you to listen to local property owners who oppose the proposed rezoning, and vote against the proposal. Ellen Clark

Origin: http://www,huntsvilleca/en/townHall/MeetyourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Ellen Clark through http://wwwhuntsvillaca/.

I ______

September 5,2017

To whom it may concern,

I am writing to voice my concerns regarding the proposed “development” of Fairview Island.

In I have been a permanent resident on my 200 acre property on for the past 40 years. that time sadly I’ve witnessed the decline of many species of wildlife frequenting my property. I hope to provide a sanctuary for the wildlife that still lives in Muskoka by leaving to my children land that will NOTbe “developed” in anyway. They will inherit stewardship of the land.

People love Muskoka not for the asphalt roads and multi storey buildings, but the natural flora and fauna and pristine wilderness. Let us strive to protect what is the best of Muskoka.

Sincerely,

Sharron Grant — Ferris and Aaron Grant

June 52017

Dear Kirstin Maxwell

Please bring this letter to the attention of the Lake of Bays Township, Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation (LBHF), Lake of Bays Association (LOBA)and the Town of Huntsville.

I would like to formally express my objection to rezoning Fairview Island from Residential to Commercial. A commercial designation willset a dangerous precedent for this part of the lake that has been a quiet and peaceful part of Lake of Bays. This designation of commercial and the plans to put a large and very active corporate retreat on this Island poses numerous issues. This would be environmentally unsound with plans for elaborate hydra resulting in light pollution and a huge septic bed; all this on an Island that previously has had outhouses and solar panels, this would be a huge step back in our collective efforts to be more environmentally sound.

My family owns the property that has a legal right of way connected to Fairview

Island and I would like to ask those of you who can make decision that will profoundly impact myself and my family to ensure that there is transparency and clarity regarding this development. The wards of the developers (the Konrad family) and what is written in their building proposal are not consistent with claims of garbage storage and by-law altering numbers of parking spots (50) on Nithgrove Road. While the applicants c’aim they do not need any changes to the Nithgrove

In addition while I respect the Township of Huntsville’s need to expend commercial opportunities for the area this project is likely to upset a huge number of individuals surrounding the Island for many years to come and by the admission of the applicants themselves willnot be an opportunity to employ any significant number of local individuals or bolster the local economy significantly. In fact by their own admission this would be a terrible business investment. Iam entreating you not to be deceived into thinking this commercial designation willbenefit the Town of Huntsville or its residents in any appreciable financial way. In fact approving this would demonstrate a clear choice to favour these developers over a very concerned and upset group of constituents. A commercial designation would make sense potentially if this proposal would benefit the whole community however as described by the developers themselves the only impact on us willbe negative.

Ifyou are not ready to reject this proposal to rezone the Island outright (which would be preferable) I would ask that you at least delay approval until all relevant stakeholders are given a chance to weigh-in (specifically LOB township).

Thank you for your consideration on this matter.

Yours truly, Ferris Grant Aaron Grant Otis Grant Alton Grant September 10, 2017

To HuntsvilleTown&DistrictCouncillors

Re:Proposed rezoning of FairviewIsland

We oppose the request to rezone FairviewIsland.

We have owned a cottage ii or 30 years and our familyhas been on the lake since the early 1950’s.We appreciate and value that Lakeof Bayshas been able to balance the need to change with the importance of preserving its unique character. Whilewe are not directly adjacent to Fairview Island,decisionsof this magnitude affect the entire lake.

Thisrezoning willallow intensive year-round use of the property by large groups with no proper governance or controls. Thisis inconsistent with the culture of Lakeof Baysand has the potential to negativelyimpact the environment, the peace and serenity of the lake and the enjoyment of those on the lake.

It isdifficultto see that this use is in any way consistent with the 1940’suse of the islandas a summer (6 week) religiouscamp. Thisrezoning willlet the island be used as a large scale for profit corporate event facilityor an “adult summer camp”with the attendant noise and pollution from waterfront activities and late-night partyIng.

It does not matter what the owners say they intend as once the rezoning isgranted there willbe no abilityto properly control the intensity of use.

Forthese reasons, we urge you to deny the rezoning application.

Yourstruly

Rickand Mary LouGossage a as ask its the have of facilities held are will with would Tourist proposal it I from we main being the appreciate (each feel I I above lots because docks, Island changed move and Institutional re-development to be the with By-law. an to reasons the is half rezoning the for residential economy use the Zoning all cottages necessary proposed the and For six local is several including of the Huntsville proposed and under of for includes proposal applications The creation the community. By-law Town areas. impacts development, permitted the the our I proposal planning as AM in support Zoning the 1 the before 11:37 docking positive extent proposed including that invest and to the island, have approve in Huntsville by Island to Maxwell options, of application maximum would willing near understand I a the boathouses retained use Kirstin Fairview September-09-17 Town to on be family Huntsville available two the planning Bays. to of in Bays is of the other on-going of of Konrad that developed Lake Town building, and the defined Lake many on the behalf as ON on commercial. have for than on system) service to Last Forest. to Island a vegetation Bays, of of Thompson resident development septic impact writing Council unate a Kirstin, The for Establishment Managed Sincerely, Lake I’m Fairview less forward. the residential Greg extent From: Sent: own Hi As To: Subject building, Jasmine -Original Message- From: [email protected] [maiIto:info@esoIutionsgroupc] On Behalf Of Sent: September-09-17 1:47 PM To: Crystal Best-Sara ras Subject: Fairview Island -Lake of Bays

Please note that we oppose the rezoning of Fairview Island as describe the the planning document on your website We urge you to protect the quality of Lake of Bays by no supporting these proposed changes

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetvourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Josee Hammilk through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

1 -Original Message- From: infoesolutionsgroup.ca [mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Sent: September-10-17 11:52 AM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: OPPOSE REZONING--READTHISG&M ARTICLE!!

Dear Councillors: We on Lake of Bays are very concerned to OPPOSETHEREZONINGof FAIRVIEWISLAND.The Konrad Group wants to make an Adult Corporate Retreat and morel Here is an example of what an Adult Camp is like from an article in the Globe and Mail. It is your DUN to not allow this Rezoning to happen! Regards Deborah and Patrick Hickey

Huntsville https://beta .thegl obeand mail.com/I fe/travel/activities-a nd-interests/eve ryones-a-wi nner-at-ca mp-no- counselors/a rticle3O284lOl/?ref=http://www.theglobea nd mail.com &

Origin: http://www.huntsvflle.ca/en/townhall/meetyourcouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Deborah & Patrick Hicke through http://www.huntsville.ca/. I

-Original Message- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sent: September-11-17 1:44 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: PLEASESTOP REZONINGOF FAIRVIEWISLAND

Please stop this rezoning in order to keep our Lake as a place for our family single family dwellings.

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetvourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Betty lrwii through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

1 www. huntsville. ca

-Original Message- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] On Behalf 0 Sent: September-12-17 11:21 AM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Rezoning of Fairview Island

Dear Members of Counsel, my wife have a cottage on and we have both been cottagers on the lake since we were very young. I wanted express our extreme displeasure in what is being proposed for the re-zoning of Fairview Island. It is not at all what was intended for the lake and we think we will severely harm the lake for everyone else’s enjoyment. We hope you put an end to it. Many thanks, Alan

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetYourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Alan Leve > through http://www.huntsville.ca/. Jasmine Last

From: LiiiDavis-Burchat Sent: September-11-17 11:28 AM To: Cc:

I Subject: Official Plan Amendment (OPA#13) and Zoning By-law Amendment (Z/22/2017/HTE) Attachments: 2017-06-26 LOBAletter re By-law amendment Z_22_2017_HTE.pdf

Dear Ms Calleja;

You willfind attached a letter from the Lake of Bays Association regarding Official Plan Amendment (OPA#1 3) and Zoning By-law Amendment (Z/22/2017/HTE) on Island No. 2, Lake of Bays, Geographic Township of Brunel, Town of Huntsville, dated 26 June 2017, which we sent previously to your attention. We would ask that this letter be shared with each member of the Town of Huntsville council and to the council as a whole, along with members of the planning committee, in advance of the public open house scheduled for September 13, 2017.

We believe this letter still accurately represents the concerns of our membership regarding this proposal.

Thank you.

LiiiDavis-Burchat Executive Coordinator LAKEOF BAYS ASSOCIATION www.loba.ca AUOCLATIOY

26 June 2017

Tanya Calleja Clerk, Town of Huntsville Town Hall, 37 Main Street East Huntsville ON P1H 1A1 By email: [email protected]

Regarding: Official Plan Amendment (OPA#13) and Zoning By-law Amendment (Z/22/2017/HTE) on Island No. 2, Lake of Bays, Geographic Township of Brunel, Town of Huntsville

Dear Ms. Calleja;

Lake ofBays Association Box S Buysville ON POB lAD t: 705-767-3395 [email protected] www.loba.ca Ingeneral consensus view that we have heard from our members isthat commercial uses should be avoided on island properties and that they should be directed to the many commercial sites around the lake that are sufferingobsolescence with a real need for renewal and re-investment or to mainland areas that are proximate to the settlement nodes. The reasons for this are that the need to service islands with landside parkingaccess and convenient boat services can clearly result in additional impacts both environmental and ambient for the broader community. The provisionof emergency services and health services to a more intensive commercial island use is also cited as an issue that requires contemplation.

Alternatively,we have heard from our members that they have lesser concerns should the island be developed and severed for residential uses in accordance with the existingzoningalthough it has been noted that the coverage provisionsinthe existingby-lawappear excessive and could use updating. Stringent site plan control should of course be exercised. Alternatives to subdivisionand severance such as detached condominium concepts could conceivablybe also employed and encouraged bythe Town to help ensure the longterm maintenance of the managed forest as common element.

Additionally,the general consensus of our members indicates no concern inthe event the proponent wishes to develop the lands under a residential zoningumbrella as a residential familycompound generally as presented provided the number of units does not exceed the combined frontage requirements of the current by-law.It is understood such a permission would require relief from restrictions that limitthe number of structures permitted on a single lot but again, such permissions are not of concern provided sufficientlydetailed plans are provided to ensure conventional waterfront setbacks, site specificlimitson coverage, Gross FloorArea (GFA)and buildingheight. Inthe event the proponent and the town wish to pursue the approval of this project as a residential familycompound, it may be appropriate for the matter to be deferred in order to allow for the refinement of plans, confirmation of required GFA,footprints, heights and setbacks and of course amplifiedsewage servicing details. It is understood there are no immediate plans to initiate construction on this project under any scenario.

Under such an alternative (residentiallyzoned) scenario, our members understand that such residential uses could be used incidentally,as can any cottage on the lake, for the use of the owners friends, family, business associates or employees or to be casually rented to anyone they choose from time to time. Under this residentiallyzoned scenario a point has been made that no anticipation of profitabilityor maximizationof utilitycan drive any future required adjustment in land use control instruments (noting that both the DistrictPlan and the HuntsvillePlan are properly very sympathetic to the optimization of commercial uses in recognized commercial zones). Asa residentially zoned property, such issues as boat docking,shore parkingand boat and taxi service would be anticipated to be at a level customarily attributed to any islandwaterfront residential use.

Lake ofBaysAssociation Box 8 Baysville ON POB lAO 1:705-767-3395 [email protected] www.Ioba.ca Finally, it has been noted that there is a difference between ownership and land use. It is noted that it is completely acceptable for private companies, corporations or trusts to own residentially zoned properties provided they are operated within the ambit of the residential use provisions. The LOBA membership also notes that there are no legal non conforming use rights to commercial or quasi commercial uses that are applicable to this property that would warrant any recognition through the establishment of new commercial uses on this island property.

We trust that you will find the foregoing informative and constructive for continuing discussions regarding this property.

Thank you. /e

Ian Beverley President cc. Kirstin Maxwell, Manager of Planning, Town of Huntsville Marie Poirier, MP Planning Ceordie l

Lake ofBays Association Box 8 Baysville ON FOB LAO t: 705-767-3395 [email protected] wwwjoha.ca -Original Message- From: info(Wesolutionsgroup.ca [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sent: September-11-17 11:07 AM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Fairview Island

Dear Council members,

I am writing you to express opposition to the Official Planning Amendment proposed for Fairview Island on Lake of Bays to be rezoned from Shoreline Residential Zone Four (5R4) to Institutional Tourist Establishment (CS3).This change of zoning is totally out of character for the area and presents numerous issues from the intensity of use, including access points and sewage treatment, as well as opening the door for further expansion under commercial considerations. I would attend your meeting but am already committed to attend an 0MB hearing in Dwight on the same day. Thank you for your consideration, Bruce MacLellan

Baysville, ON

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetvourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Bruce MacLeIIan through http://www.huntsville.ca/. -Original Message- From: inloesclutionsgroup.ca [mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Sent: September-10-17 10:08 AM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Proposed Rezoning of Fairview Island

Our family has owned our cottage on Lake of Bays for 50 years and we are vehemently opposed to the proposed development of Fairview Island. Could we just for once stop and enjoy the peace and beauty of Muskoka and not allow this land to succumb to development and the almighty dollar??? Mother Nature is wreaking her own havoc. Why dot we be good stewards and just say no to further destruction of this beautiful area.

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetvourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Claire MacFayder through http://www.huntsville.ca/. Jasmine Last

From: Mike Miller Sent September-11-17 1:18 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview Island - rezoning from residential to commercial

Dear Huntsville Planning Committee and Kirstin Maxwell,

From a reading of the limited information regarding the redevelopment of Fairview, we are concerned! It seems to us that the redevelopment to commercial use from residential use, in the middle of Lake of Bays, is totally at odds with the values of the District of Lake of Bays, Township of Huntsville and certainly the Lake of Bays Association. In addition, there are many questions and risks associated with a commercial rezoning:

* how many individuals will this corporate retreat accommodate * how are guests shuttled to and from the island, where is parking * where do food, beverage and laundry suppliers load/unload .... likely Glenmount Dock * how does all this affect the Sailing Club, Tennis Club, Nithgrove cottagers, etc * who may rent the Fairview facility, what kind of activities will take place * who manages the property and ensures the safety of guests and potential renters * what happens after the prospective owners decide to resell the island * how will all this affect boat traffic and noise, safety of other boaters * the prospective owners can achieve their goals with residential zoning

Given these material uncertainties and risks, we firmly believe that Fairview island must maintain its residential zoning.

Thank you for your consideration,

Susan Bowman, Randall and Mike Miller

Lake of Bays

1 of council. impact before less re-development have the will application it for the that for and Huntsville of support property my Town the property. the voice of this to use of AM like before good uses 8:51 re-development would I very is application potential Island Bays this Maxwell of OReilly other Lake planning Larry Kirstin Faiiview September-09-17 believe I on than the of Bays. of otherwise properties Lake and supportive, two on of and Last Island O’Reilly owner T. Kirstin, aware, the Fairview Larry From: Dear environmentally lam Sent Sincerely, Jasmine As Subject To: Jasmine Last

From: Ron Lalonde Sent: September-10-17 9:23 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview Island Zoning Application

Dear Kirstin,

lam aware of the planning application before the Town of Huntsville for the re-development of Fairview Island on Lake

of Bays. Ifurther understand that the proposal generally includes six cottages with docks, main facilities building, a service building, two boathouses and two docking areas. The proposed use is an Institutional Tourist Establishment as defined in the Town of Huntsville Zoning By-law and the zoning is proposed to be changed from residential to commercial.

As a resident on Lake of Bays, I fully support the proposal and the rezoning. This proposal will have less impact than some other available options, including the creation of several residential lots (each with its own septic system)

developed to the maximum extent as permitted under the Zoning By-law. I appreciate the extent of vegetation that is to be retained in the proposed development, including half the Island being held as a Managed Forest.

I do not see any impact to the quiet use and enjoyment of our property on Lake of Bays, or the natural environment.

The development and on-going use would have positive impacts for the local economy and Ifeel we are quite fortunate to have the Konrad family willing to make such an exciting commitment and investment in our community. So, for all

the reasons I have mentioned I would ask the Council for the Town of Huntsville to approve the planning applications necessary to move the proposal forward.

Sincerely,

Ron Lalonde

the

Bay,

access.

a the

minutes

four

utmost

the

status

located

Island

Island’s

request.

Haystack

others,

the is

are

properly for

the

Huntsville

gives

of4S

subject.

zoning

for

this

these

parking

Town

rezoning

property

times

parking

maintaining

same

marinas

process

facility

Town

the use

minimum

Rd.

current

all

the

year

Cunnington,

parking to

the

while Sep

13.

the

facilities.

current

permit

Port

each

add

plan

and

from numerous

Sep

this

that

payers

that

Marina,

provide

their

commercial will

for

Nithgrove

they

using

and

Aug24 to

Bays property

rate

the

building

the

voiced

highly.

my believe

portion

Portage

their

access

use

record

to indicates

been

time

indicate

been

minutes

We Lake

scheduled

using

Rd.

expansion

value

have be South

Bays

120

aggreement

have

They

official

of of

we not

spending and

request

Island.

“improve” commute

addendum

the

comprehensive

property,

require

will

which

Lake

Nithgrove

the

been realistic

letters

7:09 which

matter.

this

visitors.

will

on the

rezoning

exception

part

second

they

Fairview

how

this

have

Bays

Island,

most

the

marinas

that

Huntsville’s spaces

Island

versus

the

marinas they

Maxvh’ell

considers

opportunities

of With

Shut

to question

six

states

Lake

This

non-resident

reasons,

personally

rezoning of

Dan parking

Fairview

September-08-17 Kirstin of

which

Baysville

Town

marinas

lhmily

the

lbr

visitors

consideration

the

(br

the

numerous

marinas. correspondence to

residents

special.

seriously

Shut

adding

entire of

1996.

portion

variety

term

Bays

information

this

with

your

are

knowledge

Island

any

this

Our

marinas

for

Portage

VERY

since

Bays.

Maxwell: short

and

the

purchaser

My Audrey

and

Lake OPPOSED

include

you

for

1951.

Use

Ms.

and

South

applicants these

wife

are

conjunction

Last

Lake

Juntsville

Dan

in Please

potential

PREMIUM, we Thank

For

character My I

commercial visitors. Dear something

access

The

since

Pride

Mill

importance.

using

Additionally.

Town Old Sent: From:

Subject: Jasmine To: -Original Message- From: [email protected] [mailto:info@esolutionsgroupcal On Behalf Of Sent: September-10-17 2:44 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Fairview Island

Thank you for this opportunity to voice our concerns about the re-zoning of Fairview Island. After attending the last information meeting held by the Konrads we remain unconvinced of their argument for re-zoning change. We are definitely concerned about the environmental impact of the amount of redevelopment that is planned. Please give careful consideration to the Planning report from Lehman Associates. It illustrates our MANYconcerns. Thank you. Regards, Kathleen Troost

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetvourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Kathleen Troost > through http:J/www.huntsville.ca/.

a Jasmine Last

From: Ion behalf of Wadsworth, John S Jr.

Sent: September-11-17 12:12 PM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fairview island Planning Application

Dear Kirstin,

I am writing you to indicate my support for the planning application before the Town of Huntsville regarding the re development of Fairview Island on Lake of Bays. I understand that the proposal generally includes six cottages with docks, main facilities building, a service building, two boathouses and two docking areas. The proposed use is an Institutional Tourist Establishment as defined in the Town of Huntsville Zoning By-law and the zoning is proposed to be changed from residential to commercial.

As a long-time seasonal resident of Lake of Bays and business stakeholder in Port Cunnington Lodge, Bigwin Island and the Port Cunnington Marina, Ifully support the proposal and the rezoning. This proposal will have less impact than some other available options, including the creation of several residential lots developed to the maximum extent as permitted under the Zoning By-law.

is I do not see any negative impacts to Lake of Bays or the surrounding natural environment, and understand that it being proposed that half the Island will be held as a Managed Forest. I believe the strong commitment and investment by the Konrad family will be good for our community, and further believe the development and its on-going use will provide many positive impacts for the local economy. I urge staff and the Council for the Town of Huntsville to approve the planning applications necessary to allow the proposed development to move forward.

Sincerely,

Jack Wadsworth S

-Original Message- From: infoesolutionsgroup.ca [mailto:infoesolutionsgroup.ca1 On Behalf Of Sent: September-12-17 1:13 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Rezoning application of Fairview Island on Lake of

Dear Counsel members

I own a seasonal property on Lake of Bays. plan to retire to that location. Please be advised that Iam strongly opposed to the zoning application and find the intended use for Fairview island represented in the application offensive and

unacceptable from every perspective. I would strongly encourage you to deny it. thankyou

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetvourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Tom Anselmi through http://www.huntsville.ca/. Forwarded message From: Date: 9/12/2017 4:30:25 PM Subject: Fairview Island

To all elected officials and town planners for Huntsville

I am the owner of a cottage for the past 30 years at in Lake of Bays.

I am OPPOSED to the proposed amendment to the Official Plan of the Town of Huntsville and the amendment to zoning by law 2008-66P to enable the development of an institutional establishment on Fairview Island in Lake of Bays.

I feel it is not a suitable development for our lake. It will have negative impact on the people, property, environment and quality of the lake experience

Bruce Creighton

Sent from Bruce Creighton

1 -Original Message- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sent: September-06-17 2:35 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Opposing re-zoning of Fairview Island

Our family are longtime residents of and we object to the proposed re-zoning / redevelopment of Fairview Island, and would like to register our opposition at this time.

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townhall/meetyourcouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Kathryn Cronin (nee Montgomery)c > through http ://www. huntsvil Ie.caI.

1 -Original Message- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Sent: September-12-17 1:30 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Rezoning of Fairview Island, LOB

Please see my letter attached. Thank you.

Origin: http:/Jwww.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/Meetvourcouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Maureen Dinner through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

1 Dear Councillors,

I am writing with great concern about the proposed rezoning of Fairview Island on Lake of Bay5. I believe the intended use fits a ‘Tourist Establishment of which requires Commercial Zoning not recreational cottaging. They are proposing a revolving group of transient people to inhabit the island year round who come to party and have no real investment in the lake and environment. We are a community of privately owned family cottages and are respectful of each other’s proximity and privacy. For many years we have invested in a shared interest in the tranquility and pristine quality of Lake of Bays and hope that will continue for many years.

I believe the proposal by the Konrad’s to have helicopter and float plane access and as well as service from multiple marinas to ferry their guests will be disruptive to the lake. Noise, traffic, pollution, fire safety, revolving guests are some of my concerns.

In the interest of all cottagers presently and in the future, I am asking you to vote against this proposed rezoning.

Respectfully?

Maureen Dinner -Original Message- From: [email protected] [maiIto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Sent: September-12-17 2:07 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Rezoning application-Fairview Island, Lake of Bays

Dear Members of Council:

Iam a seasonal cottage/property owner on Lake of Bays and am writing to express my complete opposition to the

aforementioned rezoning application for Fairview Island on Lake of Bays. I am opposed to the proposed usage of Fairview Island as described in the Planning Justification Report and oppose the rezoning of Fairview Island. This type of rezoning will set a very dangerous and negative precedent and should not be contemplated or considered. lam unable to attend the meeting in person on September 13th and am therefore, submitting my opposition via email.

With best regards,

Sharon Mey

Origin: http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townHall/MeetyourCouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Sharon Mes through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

1 OriginalMessage From:[email protected] fmallto:[email protected]]On Behalf01 Sent: September-06-17 2:35 PM To: CrystalBest-Sararas Subject: Opposing re-zoning of FairviewIsland

Our familyare longtime residents oj nd we object to the proposed re-zoning/ redevelopment of FairviewIsland, and would liketo register our opposition at this time.

We are greatly concerned about the negative environmental impact such a development would have on the lake, includingincreased parking and car/truck/boat traffic in and around NithgroveRd(and other parts of the lake), as well as the negative impact that the supply-sideservices of such a development would have: increased noise, pollution, light, loss of tree canopy, docks,septic, etc. We are not alone in our concerns and ask that you oppose the re-zoning application. Respectfullyyours, Dr DonaldBMontgomery Tom &KathrynCronin (nee Montgomery)

Origin:http://www.huntsville.ca/en/townhall/meetyourcouncillors.asp

Thisemail was sent to you by KathrynCronin(nee Montgomes rough http ://www.huntsville.ca/.

I -Original Message- From: info@esolutionsgroug [mailto:[email protected] On Behalf 01 Sent: september-12-17 6:07 PM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Fairview Island rezoning

Thank you for not allowing the rezoning of Fairview Island, Our family have been on the Lake of Bays 70 years. Nothing positive will come out of this type of redevelopment for the Lake of Bays. Those issuing such a proposal are welcome to go elsewhere.

Or[gin: http:f/www.huntsville.ca/en/townHallfMeetYourcouncillors.asp

This email was sent to you by Patricia Anselmi’ through http://www.huntsviiie.ca/.

1 -—Original Message- From: [email protected] rmailto:infoewesolutionsgroup.ca] On Behalf Of Sent: September-13-17 6:36 AM To: Crystal Best-Sararas Subject: Rezoning of Fairview Island, Lake of Bays

We vehemently oppose the application for rezoning Fairview Island into an Adult Camp. All previous ventures have had disastrous results to the fundamental nature of a cottage lake. PLEASEVOTENOTO THISPROPOSAL. Lee Herberman Barbara Rodgers

Lake of Bays

Origin: http:J/www.huntsville.cafen/townHall/MeetyourCouncillors.aso

This email was sent to you by Lee Herbermaj through http://www.huntsville.ca/,

1 OriginalMessage From:lnfo@esolutionsgrouca [mailto:info3esolutionsgroup.ca} On BehalfOfi Sent: September-13-17 6:04 AM To:CrystalBest-Sararas Subject: FairviewIsland Re-zoning

Asa tax payer and active member of the Lakeof Bayscommunity Iwant to express myserious concern about the Konrad’sapplication to rezone FairviewIslandfor commercial use. Ifthey loveand respect LOBas much as they claim, whythe proposal to create a potentially dense, high traffic commercialventure in the middle of the lake? Yikesll

Origin:http://www.huntsville.ca/en/town[lall/MeetyourCouncjlIors.ap

Thisemail was sent to you by Pen Wisemanj through http://www.huntsville.ca/.

1 Kirstin Maxwell

From: HEINZLDSBERG Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 9:10 AM To: Kirstin Maxwell Subject: Fw:Faiwiew Island Application for Changes to Zoning

Good morning KirsUn

Just a quick note to please include our comments as this matter goes to the planning meeting on Wednesday Sept 13th. We would like to voice our objection over the request from the potential buyers of Faiiview to have the zoning changed from ‘Shoreline Residential Zone Four (SR4) to Institutional Tourist Establishment (CS3). Our understanding is that the potential buyers can build the proposed buildings within the residential planning guidelines so why the need for the change to a commercial zoning? We don’t object to future owners building their dream spot on Lake of Bays we are just not sure why you would need a parcel of land zoned commercially to do it?

Best regards

tilt I cJIliL.A..JoT,

— — •••ilL•4

1 to of is and to same less as is Report revert e-mail remains lo the sent the of 13 claim, same other rezoning on be there a on and to and to Committee’s the Bays should it Town for position 2017 covering of the spurious residential Justification a my the Mayor for Island Bays, June Although package Lalce on forward request Committee the councillors of essentially of from from ofó later. the of is you the your the Poirier, updated based see to in Lake Fairview Report. this that Bays, letter that the it Ms. grant preparation will of to that in albeit and my proposal not including of you address request do the include Lake representatives planner, As to presentation respond Foundation. Justification you shall argument and parties to I argument, version like would the Committee oral island, the because that consideration of Bays that is other my also you on Heritage update of if proponent’s of committee. updated your Report. Island. an request Planning same camp, the version an Bays would for Fairview several that Lake Report a basis 1 the by of of of as on grateful of is you the April be Faiiwiew to use not as Lake represents Council’s the copying at Justification of represents respectfully prepared in sent the I lAl the resident am position the letter Rezoning Justification September. Township letter I [would west of historic in and Council East Maxwell

my MILES 13 which the PIH this the being 2017, [untsville this Maxwell, resident of Island. Manager I St. in mile of is forward of letter, seasonal use Hall of 3/4 Ms. letter, a reason implicit Proposed Kirstin put unchanged. members this supposed Main August September2017 shall

am SIMON for its I Dear Fairview still Huntsville Although reliance I meeting members September. The that Planning Re: This planner Association of the 7 about Huntsville the commercial subject, Councillors. Ms. 37 Town Town Seasonal Essentially, my argument for no change in zoning boils down to one of fairness. As I understand it, the role of the Planning Committee, in this instance, is to judge whether this request for a change to the zoning and to the Official Plan, if granted, would result in the current members of the local community around Fairview Island feeling that they have been treated fairly.

I cannot see any grounds for such a change in zoning from a residential to a commercial use for an institutional tourist establishment being regarded as fair for the local community around Fairview.

We have the Huntsville Official Plan to bring a sense of stability to our neighbourhoods. Any change can be made, in fairness, only where there is an agreement, after much consultation with the public, that there has to be change. In such instances, the Official Plan provides a clear understanding of the rules to be followed in bringing about that change. Section 13.11.2, for example, identifies the criteria to be satisfied by a request for a site-specific proposal.

In my view, none of those seven criteria are met by this proposal. In short, the proposed development: is not in conformity with the overall intent of the Official Plan, which in this instance is to retain the residential character of this part of the lake, is not suitable for the site, given the terrain, and given the value of the island as natural habitat currently without pathways for golf carts cutting across it, is not introducing a use compatible with surrounding land uses, is not a development for which there is an obvious need, is not going to enhance the assessed values of surrounding properties, indeed it is likely to lower them, with financial implications for the Town and the taxpayers throughout the Town, is not exhibiting regard for the District of Muskoka Plan, which also calls for deveLopmentto be compatible with surrounding uses, etc.

The Iceypoint though is that our current Fluntsville Official Plan has this entire area around Faii-viewzoned for residential occupancy. The proposed use is completely incompatible with that residential character of thc community. And with the foreseeable evolution of information and communications technologies it is easy to imagine that a commercially zoned Fairview would be become the operational centre for an IT company such as the one owned by the proponent. Whether the transportation to and from the island is solely by boat or also by helicopter and float plane (as I surmise will be requested again in the fbture), that traffic could well be intense and impose inordinate noise on neighbours within at least a one-mile radius, and possibly a two-miles radius, in both the Town of Huntsville and the Township of Lake of Bays.

2 However, there is a more frmndamentalissue of trust in the planning process to be considered when a change to the Official Plan is contemplated, and it relates to my point about fairness. I am sure that I speak for all of my neighbours around Fain’iew when I say that we have made major investments in our houses or cottages — both financial and emotional investments. In my instance, I bought Crown Island when I was very young - beibre I bought a house. Then, and now, the island represents a very

major investment for inc. I invested here because 1felt I could trust the Town to respect that this lake was to be primarily a lake for local residents and cottagers, and that it would indeed he a place where one could commune with nature. I have accepted that more of the cottagers have decided to live here year round. Fair enough, providing the need to control the naLureand growth of the added burden on the natural ecosystems is reflected in the zoning and official plans of both Huntsville and the District of Muskoka.

What I cannot accept, simply because it is without justification and so very unfair for all of us in this community around Fafiwiew, is that we should have an institutional camp - what amounts to a commercial operation - plonked down in our midst. If granted, this change would amount to a betrayal of the social contract struck between residents and the government of the Town. That strikes mc as immoral. To bring this home very clearly, just imagine if the Town decided to allow a factory or an entertainment centre right next to your home.

Moving on from the immorality of any such rezoning, let me turn to examine, in more detail, the lack ofjustiflcation for this project. That justification one expects to find in the Planning Justification Report.

The proponent’s planner, Marie Poirier, tries to persuade you and me with an argument that goes like this.

The island was developed as an institutional camp in the )940s. Therezonwg to residential was questionable. The Tow,,,‘hicI, is encouraging tourtct develop,nents, should allow tins property to re—assumeits traditional role.

This argument is based on a spurious claim. For the record, I offer some corrections.

Firstly, the property was not bought from the Crown by the camp. It was sold by the Crown to Mr. Bastedo, of Baysville, around 1911. Indeed, it was known as Bastedo’s Island and used as a summer residence. He had it for many years before it was bought by David Billings Peck, who bought Burnt Island in 1915. Mr. Peck acquired both Fairview and the next island, Roothog, for his sons. Cameron Peck was given Fairview and used it as a summer residence. Cameron Peck then made the island available for use by the Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship, in the mid-forties. Ownership transferred, through purchase, to the IVCF in 1952, and to IVCF Canada in 1966 (for SI). From 1945 to 1966, when it failed, it was managed by a branch of IVCF and known as Campus in the Woods. In 1972, the island was purchased by its current owners, the Langford family, as a single family seasonal residence.

3 In short, the camp was not the dominant use of the island since it was sold by the Crown. Ofthe 106 years since that transaction, the island was used as a camp for, at most, 21 years. For some 79 years the island has been residential.

And the argument that the island should become a camp again, because it has been demonstrated as being able to support a camp, is flawed, especially when one considers that the previous camp proved to be unsustainable.

Secondly, given the admission by the IVCF that it did not think it could ever get permission to construct the buildings it did (illegally), it is not clear that Fairview Island was ever legally regarded a camp. Certainly, there is no reason to question the legality of the zoning, by the Town, of the island as shoreline residential (SR4) when the Langfords were using it as a residential propery. This zoning was in 1974. It was the first time the island, and indeed the Town, was subject to zoning.

Thus, again, the argument that the island should be redeveloped in line with its former use as a camp holds no water.

Thirdly, the proponent also argues that since the Town is encouraging tourist developments this island should be rezoned. The Town may well be encouraging of tourist developments. There is nothing wrong with that. Providing, of course, that such developments are encouraged in places where current residents and businesses find such changes in land use compatible with the surrounding uses. This is what the I-Juntsville Official Plan and the District Official Plan call for. A camp on Fahwiew would not meet the criterion of compatibility or any of the other criteria of the Town and the District official plans that I have referred to earlier. The public uprising against this proposal is surely evidence enough that the residents in this completely residential neighbourhood do not want this tourist camp on Fain’iew because it fails to satisfy the two official plans in so many ways. In a word though, it would be incompatible.

Founhly, the proponent argues that this development would be much more attractive to local residents than what could be developed under the current residential zoning, as single family cottages. Although not mentioned in the Planning Justification Report, at a meeting of Ms. Poirier, the proponent and representatives of the Lake of Bays Association, there was mention of some twenty lots being allowed on this 21-acre island under the current residential zoning. Yet the Town’s Official Plan states that every island lot has to be a minimum of 2.5 acres and have a minimum of 200 front feet of shoreline. That makes 8 lots, not 20 lots, using area as the criterion and 7 lots using front footage. If one has to satisfy both criteria then a maximum of only 7 residential lots would be allowed.

In his public letter of 8 May2017 inviting us to attend an open house to learn more, the proponent suggested that, although his proposal calls for all the docks and buildings and helicopter pad and float plane landing shown, he has no immediate plans to use the helicopter pad or float plane facility. Indeed, I note that the August Justification Report has no mention of a helipad. He also makes out that he is not creating a commercial

4 venture. This hardly fits with what is said in the Planning Justification Reports of April and August 2017. He must surely realize, that there is nothing in the rezoning that would prevent him, or a future owner, from applying for permission to build a helicopter pad and float plane landing or from renting out the space to others.

In short, the proposal’s justification is replete with false and misleading statements and false assumptions.

In addition to my concerns about the unfairness of the Town approving such a proposal, based on the inability of the proposal to satisfy the official plans of huntsville and the District, and the absence of any real justification for the project due to the Planning Justification Report’s reliance on false assumptions, I should also like to turn briefly to look at some of the negative environmental and social impacts of the proposed project.

The factors of concern are as follows.

I. The scale of the proposed development. This underpins many of the other concerns with regard to potential negative impact. There is an assumption in the Planning Justification Report that, even though there is no legal right to redevelop the buildings used for the camp that was in operation from 1945 to 1966, it is perfectly acceptable to usc the number of buildings that once existed in the WCF camp as a precedent for what should be permitted today. That line of argument certainly smacks of an assumed right to redevelop what existed before. The argument leads to a proposal for a development that will mean 50 or more people being on the island at any one time. And that, in turn, leads to several potentially negative impacts that I shall touch upon here.

2. Loss of forest cover. The island currently enjoys a Forest Management Agreement for 13acres of what until now ‘vere thought to be 20 acres (but which the latest survey suggests may be 21 acres). This was allowed after deductions for the four cabins and the boathouse and powerhouse. It is important to note that these were the only useable buildings identified, when the current owners were calculating the acreage of forest available for a Forest Management Agreement and to qualify for tax relief. The proponent maintains that he will retain the Forest Management Agreement and thus protect the forest canopy. He implies that it will be at the level of 14 acres. Clearly, with the greater number of proposed buildings (12 are listed on p. 3 and 4) and other strnctures (such as septic beds), plus extensive pathways to take electrically powered golf carts, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry will not be able to grant a MFA for anything like the same level of protection. Beyond the greatly reduced number of acres that could qualify for protection under an FMA, there is the real damage done to effective habitat for wildlife with those pathways crisscrossing the island and lit up at night. One needs contiguous habitat for animal species and this is being cut up into tiny parcels. And animals need darkness. Again, there is an attempt to mislead us. Specifically, this damage to forest cover will not satisfy the requirements of the Huntsville Official Plan sections 8.2.5 and 8.2.7 that speak to the

5 importance of retaining the character of the lake, and sections 8.2.12 and 8.2.14 that speak to the promotion of compatibility with the natural environment.

3. Loss of fish habitat. There arc spots where there are type I fish habitat around the island. The proponent argues that the docks are at least 30 metres away from this known habitat. This fails to recognize that the increased boat and scadoo traffic that will be generated by 50 plus people, or even half that number, will create a lot more disturbance- The fact that there are 6 doclcsof 15 metres length and extensive docks associated with an accessory building (another large cottage), with the facilities building, with two major boat houses (and maybe one day with the helicopter pad and float plane landing), suggests that the fish habitat is being treated without regard for the sustainability of the habitat. This would seem to run counter to Huntsville’s Official Plan sections 8.2.12 and 8.2.14.

4. Water pollution from inadequate sewage treatment and disposal. This has not been addressed adequately. This pollution is likely to threaten water quality. The latest update letter by Duke engineering, of2l June 2017, implies that we should just trust theirjudgernent, even though the facilities have not been planned yet. This is not good enough.

6. The increased noise. The potential for disturbance of our relatively peaceful lake environment over calm water over 3/4 mile or much more is very real. Fortunately, the majority of evenings at the lake are not disturbed by neighbours partying. But sound carries far over calm water. On Crown Island I can occasionally here partying on the beach on the other side of Langmaid and that is with Langmaid between us. On one occasion a graduation party on the north shore of Whitehouse Bay was so loud I could hear the words being sung and that went on till well past midnight. The proponent is planning to have Lotsof people up at the island at any one time. We can conservativeLy count sleeping space for 52 and it could well be more. These people are coming for a good time and that means parties. And we have to recognize that most of them will be transients with no commitment to the lake and its community. During Ihe day we can expect more boats (and, possibly, later, helicopters and float planes). It may well become insufferable. There is a noise by-law for the Town but enforcing it on an island is not easy for the Town.

6 protect the local character of the lake and retain views and panoramas (even at night), will not bc satisfied.

8. The introduction of visual clutter. The proposal calls for the introduction, on the shoreline, of six very long docks (of l5m.), a second large boat house, and a service dock, in addition to existing docks and a large boat house. They do not appear to be in keeping with Huntsville’s Official Plan section 8.2.10 that calls for limited impact on the natural and aesthetic environment.

In planning tenns, these potential impacts have to be exairiined and the requirements of the official plans of both Huntsville and the District have to be met. In my view, the requirements of the Huntsville and District of Muskoka official plans are not being met with the current proposal.

Finally, I wish to touch upon access to the island. The current owners use a private access point they own on Nithgrove Road in the Township of Lake of Bays. I understand this has parking for two cars. They also own and use another nearby back lot on Nithgrove Road for parking for up to IDcars. There arc two issues relating to access raised by the proposal: access during construction, and access for use of the island if developed as proposed. The August version of the Planning Justification Report states (on p. 12) that access and parking for, and access by the transitory public will not be permitted. But that does nothing to reassure neighbours of the Nithgrove lot that the flow of people as private guests will be manageable. There is a specific reference to the Nithgrove lot on p.4 and there it is stated that only residential users will embark from this point. BILt this leaves wide open how one determines whether a specific visitor is arriving as a guest of a resident or as a commercial guest. This is not something that Huntsville is likely to be able to police.

However, I am equally concerned that the government docks and other access points in other parts of the lake near Faitwiewwill also be under greater pressure if the Fain’iew development were to proceed as proposed. In short, the question of access needs more attention by both the Town of Huntsville and the Township of Lake of Bays.

Thus, for all these reasons, I respectifilly request that the applications for a rezoning and an amendment to Huntsville’s Official Plan be denied.

Yours sincerely,

(Signed)

7 Simon Miles cc. Town of Huntsville Mayor and Councillors through Kirstin Maxwell Township of Lake of Bays Mayor Bob Young, and Councillors Baker, Lacroix, Tapley, Ross, Peppard and Glover Township of Lake of Bays Planner, Melissa Markham Lake of Bays Association President Ian Beverley, and Co-chairs of the Planning & Development Committee, Barry Morrison and Brian Simpson Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation President Judith Mills

8 SIMON MILES ,mon-miIessvmpatico.ca

Seasonal resident at Lake of Bays, Town of Huntsville

6 February 2018

Ms. Kirstin Maxwell Planning Manager Town oflluntsville Town Hail 37 Main St. East Huntsville PIH IAI

Dear Ms. Maxwell, Re: Proposed Rezoning of Fairview Island, Lake of Bays, from residential to commercial: Supplementary Comments to my letter of 7 September 2017

I understand that the above application for the rezoning of Fahwiew Island will be considered by the Planning Committee at its meeting oF 14 February.

I have read the 3 documents submitted by the proponent, Mr. Konrad, in October2017, in response to the request by the Planning Committee for additional information on the proposal. The 3 documents to which I refer are: the character and compatibility analysis; the clarification of use document; and, the draft zoning by-law.

I wish to submit a Fewsupplementary comments to be considered alongside my letter of 7 September 2017.

I wish to convey to the Committee that none of the above documents changes my understanding of the proposed development of Fairview, nor my conclusions.

Thus, I respectfully reiterate my request that the applications for a rezoning and an amendment to Huntsville’s Official Plan be denied.

Although the 3 documents attempt to convey that the neighbours would be better off with a commercial establishment on Faiiview than the conventional development of the island as single-family cottages, lam still left with the clear impression of a very large number of young people (estimated at over 50) on the island intent on having a very good time and thus generating a lot of noise and other interferences with the peace of the local setting.

There also remains the concern that, once zoned commercial. the island can be sold for other uses which will be equally incompatible with the community. There are also errors in the details provided in the 3 documents. One of significance is that if the island were to be developed for residential lots, the maximum number of lots would not be the eight claimed by Mr. Konrad, but 7, since the criterion of front footage has to be satisfied in addition to thc criterion of lot area.

The documents also continue to attempt to mislead us in their portrayal of the future of the island. For example, they imply, by reference to the continuation of the Forest Management Agreement, that the forest cover would be little changed. But as my letter of 7 September argues, both the area of that forest cover and its value as habitat would be reduced in a very significant way by the proposed uses.

The documents also raise new questions. For example, if the lot coverage in the proposed development is only 3.6%, then why does the proponent seek, in the draft zoning by-law, a 5% coverage? That may not seem like much ofa difference, but an increase of 1.4% on 3.6% is very significant when translated into square footage of buildings. Indeed, we would be allowing another 38% of ground area coverage and presumably the same in terms of usable floor area.

There are other misleading statements in this additional information. Suffice it to say that I trust these examples should enable the Committee to appreciate why my position remains unchanged and why I respectfully request that the applications be denied.

Yours sincerely,

(Signed)

Simon Miles cc. Town of Huntsville Mayor and Councillors through Kirstin Maxwell Township of Lake of Bays Mayor Bob Young, and Councillors Baker. Lacroix, Tapley, Ross, Peppard and Glover Township of Lake of Bays Planner, Melissa Markham Lake of Bays Association President Ian Beverley, and Co-chairs of the Planning & Development Committee. Barry Morrison and Brian Simpson Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation President Judith Mills

2 LAKE OF BAYS IWCBI FOUNDATION

P.O. Box 81. Baysville. Ontario P08 lAO w’vw.lakeofbavsheritage.ca

February 5, 2018

Ms. Kirstin Maxwell, Planning Manager, Town of Huntsville, Town Hall, 37 Main St. East, Huntsville, Ontario, P1H 1A1

Dear Ms. Maxwell,

Re: The Proposed Redevelopment of Fairview Island

Further to our letter of September 6111, and on behalf of the Directors of the Lake of Bays

Heritage Foundation, I want to confirm that, following our review of the additional inforrntion submitted by Mr Konrad in October, our concerns regarding the development of FaiMew Island remain unchanged. As a registered Land Trust supporting a community engaged in the protection of its natural, built and cultural legacy, we are particularly concerned about the issues raised at three public meetings:

The requested zoning change to commercial use — this being the main point of concern, as much of what the proponent wants to do could be done with the current residential zoning and, more importantly, the opening of the island to commercial development could lead to any number of unknown types of development in the future; • Supervision of the property when owners are not present; • The future of the Managed Forest Agreement; • The treatment of sewage and protection of lake water quality; • The protection of fish habitat; • The prevention of night sky light pollution.

Judith Mills,

President Lake of Bays Heritage Foundation

P r c s c r v I ii g t Ti e L e g a c for Generations