DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography BIBLIOGRAPHY Abbi, Anvita. 1991. Reduplication in South Asian Languages. An Areal, Typological and His- torical Study. New Delhi. Allied Publishers. ——. 2001. A Manual of Linguistic Field Work and Structures of Indian Languages. Munich: Lincom Europa. ——. 2003. Vanishing Voices of the Languages of the Andaman Islands. Paper presented at the Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, June 13. ——. 2005. “Is Great Andamanese Typologically Divergent from the Standard Aver- age Andamanese?” Paper presented at ALT VI, Max Planck Institute, Padang, Indonesia. ——. 2006a. Endangered Languages of the Andaman Islands. München: Lincom GmbH. ——. 2006b. “Vanishing Voices: A Typological Sketch of Great Andamanese.” In: Anju Saxena & Lars Borin (eds.). Lesser-Known Languages of South Asia. Status and Policies, Case Studies and Applications of Information Technology. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 107–123. ——. 2008. Folk Songs of the Great Andamans CD-Rom. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru Uni- versity. ——. 2009. “Is Great Andamanese Genealogically and Typologically Distinct from Onge and Jarawa?” Language Sciences 31: 791–812. ——. 2011. “Body Divisions in Great Andamanese: Possessive Classification, the Semantics of Inherency and Grammaticalization.” Studies in Language 35/4: 735–788. ——. 2012. A Dictionary of the Great Andamanese Language. English-Great Andamanese-Hindi (with CD Rom) Delhi: Ratna Sagar P. Ltd. ——. 2012. An Ancient Tale from Andaman. Narrated by Nao Jr. Delhi: National Book Trust, India. Abbi, Anvita, Bidisha Som & Alok Das. 2007. “Where Have All the Speakers Gone? A Socio- linguistic Study of the Great Andamanese.” Indian Linguistics 68/3–4: 325–342. Abbi, Anvita, Nao Jr. & Abhishek Avatans. 2008. Varnamala the Book of Letters of Great Andamanese. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University. Abbi, Anvita & Pramod Kumar. 2010. “In Search of Language Contact Between Jarawa and Aka-Bea: The Languages of South Andaman.” Paper read at the First Conference on ASJP and Language Prehistory (ALP-I), Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany on 18 September 2010. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ——. 2002. “Typological Parameters for the Study of Clitics, with Special Reference to Tariana.” In: R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 42–78. ——. 2007. “Typological Distinctions in Word-Formation.” In: Timothy Shopen (ed.), Vol. 3. 1–65. ——. 2008. “Versatile Cases.” Journal of Linguistics 44: 565–603. Allan, Edward J. 1975–1976. “Inalienable Possession in Four Ethiopian Languages.” Afrika und Übersee 59: 300–307. Ameka, Felix. 1996. “Body Parts in Ewe Grammar.” In: Hilary Chappell & William McGregor (eds.). 783–840. Anderson, R. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Avtans, Abhishek. 2006. Diectic Categories in Great Andamanese. M.Phil. dissertation, Jawa- harlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 292 bibliography ——. 2007. “Humane Face of Language Documentation: A Great Andamanese experience.” In: Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond & David Nathan (eds.). Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation & Linguistic Theory. London: Department of Linguistics, SOAS. 21–28. Avtans, Abhishek & Anvita Abbi. 2006. “Language Documentation in Andamans: Highs and Lows.” In: R. Elangaiyan, R. Mckenna Brown, Nicholas D. M. Ostler & Mahendra K. Verma (eds.). The Proceedings of the Tenth Foundation of Endangered Languages Confer- ence, Vital Voices: Endangered Languages and Multilingualism. Mysore: CIIL. 73–76. Bally, Charles. 1996 (1926). “The Expression of Concepts of the Personal Domain and Indi- visibility in Indo-European Languages.” In: Hilary Chappell & William McGregor (eds.). 31–61. Barker, C. 1997. Possessive Descriptions. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Baron, Irène, Michael Herslund & Finn Sørensen (eds.). 2001. Dimensions of Possession. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins (Typological studies in language, 47). Basu, D. N. 1952. “A Linguistic Introduction to Andamanese.” Bulletin of the Department of Anthropology, 1–2: 55–70. ——. 1955. “A General Note on the Andamanese Languages.” Indian Linguistics 16: 213– 225. Berlin, Brent. 1976. “The Concept of Rank in Ethnological Classification. Some Evidence from Aguaruna Folk Botany.” American Ethnology 3: 381–99. ——. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification. Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Bladon, R. A. W. 1979. “The Production of Laterals: Some Articulatory Properties and their Acoustic Implications.” In: H. Hollien & P. Hollien (eds.). Current Issues in the Phonetic Sciences. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 501–508. Blevins, Juliette. 2007. “A Long Lost Sister of Proto-Austronesian? Proto-Ongan, Mother of Jarawa and Onge of the Andaman Islands.” Oceanic Linguistics 46/1: 155–198. de Bot, Kees. 2004. “Language Attrition.” International Journal of Bilingualism 8:3. Kingston Press. Bulmer, R. N. H. 1974. “Memoirs of a Small Game Hunter: On the Track of Unknown Ani- mal Categories in New Guinea.” Journal D’agriculture Tropicale et de Botanique Appli- quée 21: 79–99. Campbell, Lyle. 1997. “The Amerind Personal Pronouns: A Second Opinion.” Language 73/2: 339–351. Chafe, Wallace. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Chappell, Hilary & Sandra A. Thompson. 1992. “Semantics and Pragmatics of Associative de in Mandarin Discourse.” Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 21/2: 199–229. Chappell, Hilary & William McGregor. 1989. “Alienability, Inalienability and Nominal Clas- sification.” Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting the Berkeley Linguistic Society 15: 24–36. ——. 1996. “Prolegomena to a Theory of Inalienability.” In: Hilary Chappell & William McGregor (eds.). 3–30. —— (eds.). 1996. The Grammar of Inalienability. A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part-Whole Relation. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Chaudhary, Narayan. 2007. Developing a Computational Framework for the Verb-Morphology of Great Andamanese. M.Phil. Dissertation. Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Chaudhary, Narayan, Anvita Abbi & Girish Nath Jha. 2008. “Morphological Analyzer for Great Andamanese Verbs: Implementing a Concatenate Template.” Vishwabharat April 2007–January 2008: 113–118. Cipriani, Lidio. 1966. The Andaman Islanders. Ed. and translated by D. Tayler Cox. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson. Comrie, Bernard. 1976. “The Syntax of Action Nominals: A Cross-Linguistic Study.” Lingua 40: 177–201..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Search of Language Contact Between Jarawa and Aka-Bea: the Languages of South Andaman1
    Acta Orientalia 2011: 72, 1–40. Copyright © 2011 Printed in India – all rights reserved ACTA ORIENTALIA ISSN 0001-6483 In search of language contact between Jarawa and Aka-Bea: The languages of South Andaman1 Anvita Abbi and Pramod Kumar Cairns Institute, Cairns, Australia & Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Abstract The paper brings forth a preliminary report on the comparative data available on the extinct language Aka-Bea (Man 1923) and the endangered language Jarawa spoken in the south and the central parts of the Andaman Islands. Speakers of Aka-Bea, a South Andaman language of the Great Andamanese family and the speakers of Jarawa, the language of a distinct language family (Abbi 2006, 2009, Blevins 2008) lived adjacent to each other, i.e. in the southern region of the Great Andaman Islands in the past. Both had been hunter-gatherers and never had any contact with each other (Portman 1899, 1990). The Jarawas have been known for living in isolation for thousands of years, coming in contact with the outside world only recently in 1998. It is, then surprising to discover traces of some language-contact in the past between the two communities. Not a large database, but a few examples of lexical similarities between Aka-Bea and Jarawa are 1 The initial version of this paper was presented in The First Conference on ASJP and Language Prehistory (ALP-I), on 18 September 2010, Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. We thank Alexandra Aikhnevald for helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper. 2 Anvita Abbi & Pramod Kumar investigated here.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One: Social, Cultural and Linguistic Landscape of India
    Chapter one: Social, Cultural and Linguistic Landscape of India 1.1 Introduction: India also known as Bharat is the seventh largest country covering a land area of 32, 87,263 sq.km. It stretches 3,214 km. from North to South between the extreme latitudes and 2,933 km from East to West between the extreme longitudes. On this 2.4 % of earth‟s surface, lives 16% of world‟s population. With a population of 1,028,737,436 variations is there at every step of life. India is a land of bewildering diversity. India is bounded by the Indian Ocean on the Figure 1.1: India in World Population south, the Arabian Sea on the west and the Bay of Bengal on the east. Many outsiders explored India via these routes. The whole of India is divided into twenty eight states and seven union territories. Each state has its own cultural and linguistic peculiarities and diversities. This diversity can be seen in every aspect of Indian life. Whether it is culture, language, script, religion, food, clothing etc. makes ones identity multi-dimensional. Ones identity lies in his language, his culture, caste, state, village etc. So one can say India is a multi-centered nation. Indian multilingualism is unique in itself. It has been rightly said, “Each part of India is a kind of replica of the bigger cultural space called India.” (Singh U. N, 2009). Also multilingualism in India is not considered a barrier but a boon. 17 Chapter One: Social, Cultural and Linguistic Landscape of India Languages act as bridges because it enables us to know about others.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of the World--Indo-Pacific Fascicle Eight
    REPORT RESUMES ED 010 367 48 LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD--INDO-PACIFIC FASCICLE EIGHT. ST- VOEGELI1, C.F. VOEGELIN, FLORENCE M. INDIANA UNIV., BLOOMINGTON REPORT NUMBER NDEA- VI -63 -20 PUB DATE. APR 66 CONTRACT OEC-SAE-9480 FURS PRICE MF-$Q.18HC-52.80 70P. ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS, 8(4)/1-64, APRIL 1966 DESCRIPTORS- *LANGUAGES, *INDO PACIFIC LANGUAGES, ARCHIVES OF LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD, BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA THIS REPORT DESCRIBES SOME OF THE LANGUAGES AND LANGUAGE FAMILIES OF THE SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA REGIONS OF THE INDO-PACIFIC AREA. THE LANGUAGE FAMILIES DISCUSSED WERE JAKUM, SAKAI, SEMANG, PALAUNG-WA (SALWEEN), MUNDA, AND DRAVIDIAN. OTHER LANGUAGES DISCUSSED WERE ANDAMANESE, N/COBAnESE, KHASI, NAHALI, AND BCRUSHASKI. (THE REPORT IS PART OF A SERIES, ED 010 350 TO ED 010 367.) (JK) +.0 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE b D Office of Education tr's This document has been reproduced exactlyas received from the S.,4E" L es, C=4.) person or organiz3t1on originating It. Points of view or opinions T--I stated do not nocessart- represent official °dice of Edumdion poeWon or policy. AnthropologicalLinguistics Volume 8 Number 4 April 116 6 LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD: INDO- PACIFIC FASCICLE EIGHT A Publication of the ARCHIVES OFLANGUAGES OF THEWORLD Anthropology Department Indiana University ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS is designed primarily, but not exclusively, for the immediate publication of data-oriented papers for which attestation is available in the form oftape recordings on deposit in the Archives of Languages of the World.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 4- Language Schedule in the Constitution Official Language - Constitutional/Statutory Provisions
    UNIT 4- LANGUAGE SCHEDULE IN THE CONSTITUTION OFFICIAL LANGUAGE - CONSTITUTIONAL/STATUTORY PROVISIONS Article 343(1) of the Constitution provides that Hindi in Devanagari script shall be the Official Language of the Union. Article 343(2) also provided for continuing the use of English in official work of the Union for a period of 15 years (i.e., up to 25 January 1965) from the date of commencement of the Constitution. Article 343(3) empowered the parliament to provide by law for continued use of English for official purposes even after 25 January 1965. Accordingly, section 3(2) of the Official Languages Act, 1963 (amended in 1967) provides for continuing the use of English in official work even after 25 January 1965. The Act also lays down that both Hindi and English shall compulsorily be used for certain specified purposes such as Resolutions, General Orders, Rules, Notifications, Administrative and other Reports, Press Communiqués; Administrative and other Reports and Official Papers to be laid before a House or the Houses of Parliament; Contracts, Agreements, Licenses, Permits, Tender Notices and Forms of Tender, etc. SCHEDULED AND NON-SCHEDULED LANGUAGES In India, language status planning occurred through “officialization” (recognition as a scheduled language) in a special section of the Constitution, the 8th Schedule of the Constitution. This Schedule’s original purpose was stated in Article 351 of the Constitution in relation to the corpus planning of Hindi: “It shall be the duty of the Union to promote the spread of the Hindi language,
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-European Nominal Inflection in Nostratic Perspective*
    Václav Blažek Masaryk University (Brno) Indo-European nominal inflection in Nostratic perspective* The paper summarizes some of the current views on the history and origins of Indo- European nominal declension, including a brief comparison of several hypotheses on the mechanism of arisal of the “thematic” type of declension (o-stems). The reconstructed para- digmatic system is subsequently compared with the respective systems for other language families that form part of the hypothetical Nostratic macrofamily: Semitic (and Afro-Asiatic in general), Kartvelian, Uralic. It is concluded that, since most of the case endings of Proto- Indo-European are explainable either through internal derivation within Indo-European it- self or through comparison with other Nostratic languages, the situation points strongly to- wards an analytic nature of Proto-Nostratic. Keywords: Historical linguistics, Indo-European languages, comparative morphology, Nostratic hypothesis. 0. One of the parameters employed in the so-called typological classification of languages is whether the languages in question use or do not use affixation, i. e. whether they express such nominal grammatical categories as case, number, gender, grade, etc., or such verbal categories as person, number, time, aspect, mood etc., by means of suffixes, prefixes, or infixes. Such languages are called synthetic. Languages without affixation, called analytic, use other grammatical tools to express these categories (if they are differentiated in the first place), such as (frequently) vari- ous auxiliaries and particles, as well as more or less firmly fixed word order. Synthetic lan- guages are further divided into agglutinative and flective. A basic feature of the agglutinative languages is that each of their affixes bears only one function (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Linguistic Prehistory with Particular Reference to Andamanese * Burenhult, Niclas
    Deep linguistic prehistory with particular reference to Andamanese * Burenhult, Niclas 1996 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Burenhult, N. (1996). Deep linguistic prehistory with particular reference to Andamanese *. (Working Papers, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics; Vol. 45). http://www.ling.lu.se/disseminations/pdf/45/Burenhult.pdf Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics 1 Working Papers 45 (1996), 5–24 Deep linguistic prehistory with particular reference to Andamanese Niclas Burenhult Introduction In 1992, American linguist Johanna Nichols introduced a new method of detecting typological patterns at great time depths, based on the morphological analysis and cross-linguistic comparisons of several structural types and grammatical categories (Nichols 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-European Declension in Nostratic Perspective
    INDO-EUROPEAN NOMINAL INFLECTION Václav Blažek 0. One of points of view of so-called typological classification is fact, if a considered language uses affixation or not. It means, if the language expresses such grammatical categories as case, number, gender, grade, etc. from nominal categories and person, number, time, aspect, mood etc., from verb, by suffixes, prefixes or infixes. Such languages are called synthetic. Languages without affixation, called analytic, use other grammatical tools to express these categories, if they differentiate them at all, frequently various auxiliaries and particles, plus more or less firm syntax. Synthetic languages are further divided into agglutinative and flective. A basic feature of the agglutinative languages is that their affixes bear only one function (cf. e.g. Čermák 1997, 178-80). It can be illustrated on example of three specimen agglutinative languages, Turkish, Finnish and Georgian, where it is easy to identify the case endings universal for both singular and plural. Turkish and Georgian also use the only plural suffix. In Finnish two plural markers are differentiated, -t in the nom.-acc. and -i/-j- in oblique cases. Table 1 Turkish "house" Finnish "house" Georgian: "son" case sg. pl. case sg. pl. case sg. pl. nom. ev ev-ler nom. talo talo-t nom. švil-i švil-eb-i acc. ev-i ev-ler-i acc. talo talo-t erg. švil-ma švil-eb-ma gen. ev-in ev-ler-in gen. talo-n talo-j-en gen. švil-is švil-eb-is dat. ev-e ev-ler-e allat. talo-lle talo-i-lle dat.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Linguistic Clues to Andamanese Pre-History
    Linguistic clues to Andamanese pre-history: Understanding the North-South divide Juliette Blevins Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology ABSTRACT The Andaman Islands, were, until the 19th century, home to numerous hunter-gatherer societies. The ten or so tribes of Great Andamanese spread over the north and central parts of the islands are thought to have spoken related languages, while the Onge, Jangil and Jarawa of the southern parts, including Little Andaman, have been assumed to constitute a distinct linguistic family of 'Ongan' languages. Preliminary reconstruction of Proto-Ongan shows a potential link to Austronesian languages (Blevins 2007). Here, preliminary reconstructions of Proto-Great Andamanese are presented. Two interesting differences characterize the proto-languages of northern vs. southern tribes. First, sea-related terms are easily reconstructable for Proto-Great Andamanese, while the same is not true of Proto-Ongan. Second, where Proto-Ongan shows an Austronesian adstrate, Proto-Great Andamanese includes lexemes which resemble Austroasiatic reconstructions. These linguistic clues suggest distinct prehistoric origins for the two groups. 1. An introduction to languages and peoples of the Andaman Islands. The Andaman Islands are a cluster of over 200 islands in the Bay of Bengal between India and Myanmar (Burma) (see Map 1). [MAP 1 AROUND HERE; COURTESY OF GEORGE WEBER] They were once home to a range of hunter-gatherer societies, who are best known from the descriptions of Man (1883) and Radcliffe-Brown (1922). These writers, along with the Andamanese themselves, split the population of the Andamans into two primary language/culture groups, the 'Great Andaman Group' and the 'Little Andaman Group' (Radcliffe-Brown 1922:11).
    [Show full text]
  • The Language of the Shom Pen: a Language Isolate in the Nicobar Islands
    The language of the Shom Pen: a language isolate in the Nicobar islands [DRAFT CIRCULATED FOR COMMENT] Roger Blench Mallam Dendo 8, Guest Road Cambridge CB1 2AL United Kingdom Voice/ Fax. 0044-(0)1223-560687 Mobile worldwide (00-44)-(0)7967-696804 E-mail [email protected] http://www.rogerblench.info/RBOP.htm Cambridge, Friday, 21 September 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. THE SHOM PEN LANGUAGE ................................................................................................................ 2 3. SHOM PEN PHONOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Vowels .....................................................................................................................................................................2 3.2 Consonants..............................................................................................................................................................3 3.3 Orthographic conversions .....................................................................................................................................3 4. ANNOTATED SHOM PEN WORDLIST ................................................................................................ 3 5.THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE SHOM PEN LANGUAGE............................................................ 20 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptive and Typological Study of Jarawa Doctor Of
    DESCRIPTIVE AND TYPOLOGICAL STUDY OF JARAWA Thesis submitted to the Jawaharlal Nehru University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Pramod Kumar under the supervision of Prof. Anvita Abbi & Prof. Bernard Comrie CENTRE FOR LINGUISTICS SCHOOL OF LANGUAGE, LITERATURE, AND CULTURE STUDIES JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY NEW DELHI – 110067 2012. Centre for Linguistics School of Language, Literature & Culture Studies lawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi-ll0067, India Dated: 2-0 . 0\ · '2.-011- CERTIFICATE This thesis titled "Descriptive & Typological Study of Jarawa" submitted by Mr. Pramod Kumar, Centre for Linguistics, School of Language, Literature, and Culture Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, is an original work and has not been submitted so far in part or in full, for any other degree or diploma of any University or Institution. ntis may be placed before the examiners for evaluation for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy . ~~ (PROF. ANVITA 1\B]31) (PROF. BERNARD COMRIE) SUPERVISOR JOINT-SUPERVISOR .! ew I, ~ , • > . I .. ' '" !_¢."7 PROF. FRANSON D. MANJALI CHAIRPERSON Tel: +91-11-26704199 Fax: +91- I 1-26741586 DECLARATION BY THE CANDIDATE This thesis titled "Descriptive & Typological Study of Jarawa" submitted by me for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, is an original work and has not been submitted so far in part or in full, for any other degree or diploma of any University or Institute. PRAMOD KUMAR Ph. D. student Centre for Linguistics SLL&CS/JNU i Acknowledgements In the completion of this thesis, I am indebted to a lot of people whom, I must acknowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Development of Language in South Asia: Phylogeny Versus Epigenetics?
    Origin and Development of Language in South Asia: Phylogeny Versus Epigenetics? The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Witzel, Michael E. J. Origin and development of language in South Asia: Phylogeny versus epigenetics? Paper presented at Darwin and Evolution, mid-year meeting of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Hyderabad, India, July 3, 2009. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8554510 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA 2 Origin and development of language in South Asia: Phylogeny versus epigenetics? MICHEL WITZEL Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University, 1 Bow Street, Cambridge MA 02138, USA Email: [email protected] SUMMARY his presentation begins with a brief overview of opinions on Tthe origin of human language and the controversial question of Neanderthal speech. Moving from the language of the ‘African Eve’ to the specific ones of the subcontinent, a brief overview is given of the prehistoric and current South Asian language families as well as their development over the past c. 5000 years. The equivalents of phylogeny and epigenetics in linguistics are then dealt with, that is, the successful Darwinian-style phylogenetic reconstruction of language families (as ‘trees’), which is interfered with by the separate wave-like spread of certain features across linguistic boundaries, even across language families.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainland Southeast Asian Languages
    N. J. Enfield and Bernard Comrie Mainland Southeast Asian languages State of the art and new directions 1 Mainland Southeast Asia and its people Mainland Southeast Asia (hereafter: MSEA) can be broadly defined as the area occupied by present day Cambodia, Laos, Peninsular Malaysia, Thailand, Myanmar, and Vietnam, along with areas of China south of the Yangtze River. Also sometimes included are the seven states of Northeast India, and—although here the term ‘mainland’ no longer applies—the islands from Indonesia and Malaysia running southeast to Australia and West Papua (see Map 1). There are no exact borders around the MSEA area. Different scholars draw lines in different places. But there is nevertheless a core (Comrie 2007: 45). MSEA is always taken to include Indochina—Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia— together with Thailand, and, usually, Peninsular Malaysia and part or all of Myanmar (see Map 2). This book covers the broader scope of Greater MSEA, with several chapters moving beyond the core area of Indochina and Thailand, in all directions; see chapters in this book by Vittrant and by Jenny on Myanmar (cf. Bradley 1995; Watkins 2005), by Post on Northeast India (cf. Morey and Post 2008, 2010; Hyslop, Morey, and Post 2011, 2012, 2013), by Gil on Insular Southeast Asia (cf. Adelaar and Himmelmann 2005; Blust 2013a, b), and by de Sousa on Southern China (cf. Bauer 1996; Ansaldo and Matthews 2001; Chappell 2001). MSEA is a tropical and sub-tropical area with rugged and well-forested hills and river systems running from higher altitudes in the northwest to the plains and deltas of the south.
    [Show full text]