Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 217028
Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Record of Site Condition Number 217028 Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/02/27 Certification Date 2012/11/30 Current Property Use Agricultural/Other Intended Property Use Residential Certificate of Property Use Number No CPU Applicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard, with Non-potable Ground Water, Coarse Textured Soil, for Residential property use Property Municipal Address No Municipal Address, Brampton
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 1 of 19 PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS
Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC
Owner Name 1692310 ONTARIO LIMITED
Authorized Person JACK EISENBERGER
Mailing Address 501, 5400 YONGE STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA
Postal Code M2N 5R5
Phone (416) 227-9005
Fax (416) 227-9007 Email Address [email protected]
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 2 of 19 RSC Property Location Information
Municipal Address(es) No Municipal Address
Municipality Brampton
Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter
Assessment Roll 10080011127540000 Number(s)
Property Identifier 14086-0086 (LT) Number(s)
RSC Property Geographical References
Coordinate System UTM Datum NAD 83
Zone 17
Easting 599,483.75
Northing 4,833,468.95
RSC Property Use Information
The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.
Current Property Use Agricultural/Other Intended Property Use Residential
Certificate of Property No Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 3 of 19 Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC
The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 4 of 19 PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS Qualified Person's Information
Name SHAMA M. QURESHI
Type of Licence Under Licence Professional Engineers Act
Licence Number 100067344
QP Employer Name TERRAPROBE INC.
Mailing Address 11 INDELL LANE, BRAMPTON ONTARIO, L6T 3Y3 CANADA
Phone (905) 796-2650
Fax (905) 796-2250
Email Address [email protected]
Municipal Information
Local or Single-Tier Brampton Municipality
Upper-Tier Municipality Peel
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office
District Office Halton-Peel District Office
District Office Address 4145 North Service Road, Suite 300, Burlington ON L7L 6A3
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 5 of 19 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components (YYYY/MM/DD) of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) 2014-11-03
Type of Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title Report (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company
P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Proposed 2013-01-03 Shama TERRAPROBE INC. Residential Subdivision CVSP Block 6 Altone West Brampton Qureshi and Ontario Shafi Andseta
P1 ESA Phase One ESA Update Proposed Residential Subdivision 2014-11-03 Shama TERRAPROBE INC. Update CVSP Block 6 Altone West Brampton Ontario Qureshi and Shafi Andseta
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment
Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company
N/A
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 6 of 19 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation (YYYY/MM/DD) components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) 2014-11-13
Type of Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title Report (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company
P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Proposed 2013-01-31 Shama TERRAPROBE INC. Residential Subdivision CVSP Block 6 Altone West Brampton Qureshi and Ontario Shafi Andseta
P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Update Proposed 2014-11-13 Shama TERRAPROBE INC Update Residential Subdivision CVSP Block 6 Altone West Brampton Qureshi and Ontario Shafi Andseta
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment
Date of Report Author Name of Consulting Report Title (YYYY/MM/DD) of Report Company . N/A
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 7 of 19 Environmental Condition
Section 41 applies? No
Section 43.1 applies? No
Site Condition Information
Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2012/11/30 Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 4.89670
Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property
Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property
Soil Texture Coarse
Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes
Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or Yes under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under Yes the property which is used in the RSC?
Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or AGAT LABORATORIES sediment
Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable
Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3
Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2014/11/03 Upper-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2014/11/03
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 8 of 19 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 1 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.14 1.5 µg/g 2 Chromium VI < 0.2 8 µg/g
3 Cyanide (CN-) < 0.04 0.051 µg/g 4 Electrical Conductivity 0.19 0.7 mS/cm 5 Mercury < 0.1 0.27 µg/g 6 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.328 5 7 Antimony < 0.8 7.5 µg/g 8 Arsenic 5 18 µg/g 9 Selenium 0.5 2.4 µg/g 10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 5 55 µg/g 11 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 98 µg/g 12 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 50 300 µg/g 13 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 50 2800 µg/g 14 Acenaphthene < 0.05 7.9 µg/g 15 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 0.15 µg/g 16 Anthracene < 0.05 0.67 µg/g 17 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.05 0.5 µg/g 18 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.05 0.3 µg/g 19 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.78 µg/g 20 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 6.6 µg/g 21 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.78 µg/g 22 Chrysene < 0.05 7 µg/g 23 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.1 µg/g 24 Fluoranthene < 0.05 0.69 µg/g 25 Fluorene < 0.05 62 µg/g
26 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.38 µg/g 27 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.05 0.99 µg/g 28 Naphthalene < 0.05 0.6 µg/g 29 Phenanthrene < 0.05 6.2 µg/g 30 Pyrene < 0.05 78 µg/g
31 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g 32 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 2 µg/g 33 Toluene < 0.08 2.3 µg/g 34 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 3.1 µg/g 35 Barium 127 390 µg/g
...Continued on next page
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 9 of 19 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 36 Beryllium 0.8 4 µg/g 37 Boron (total) 10 120 µg/g 38 Cadmium < 0.5 1.2 µg/g 39 Chromium Total 23 160 µg/g 40 Cobalt 11.6 22 µg/g 41 Copper 32 140 µg/g 42 Lead 13 120 µg/g 43 Molybdenum < 0.5 6.9 µg/g 44 Nickel 24 100 µg/g 45 Silver < 0.2 20 µg/g 46 Thallium < 0.4 1 µg/g 47 Uranium 0.5 23 µg/g 48 Vanadium 31 86 µg/g 49 Zinc 59 340 µg/g
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 10 of 19 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 1 Acenaphthene < 0.2 600 µg/L 2 Acenaphthylene < 0.2 1.8 µg/L
3 Anthracene < 0.1 2.4 µg/L 4 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.2 4.7 µg/L 5 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.01 0.81 µg/L 6 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.1 0.75 µg/L 7 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.2 0.2 µg/L
8 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.1 0.4 µg/L 9 Chrysene < 0.1 1 µg/L 10 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.2 0.52 µg/L 11 Fluoranthene < 0.2 130 µg/L 12 Fluorene < 0.2 400 µg/L 13 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.2 0.2 µg/L 14 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.2 1800 µg/L 15 Naphthalene < 0.2 1400 µg/L 16 Phenanthrene < 0.1 580 µg/L 17 Pyrene < 0.2 68 µg/L 18 Antimony 1.8 20000 µg/L 19 Arsenic 2.1 1900 µg/L 20 Selenium 11.1 63 µg/L 21 Sodium 55,400 2300000 µg/L 22 Acetone < 1 130000 µg/L 23 Bromomethane < 0.2 5.6 µg/L 24 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L 25 Chlorobenzene < 0.1 630 µg/L
26 Chloroform < 0.2 2.4 µg/L 27 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.1 4600 µg/L 28 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.1 9600 µg/L 29 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.1 8 µg/L 30 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.2 4400 µg/L
31 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.3 320 µg/L 32 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 33 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.3 1.6 µg/L 34 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 35 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L
...Continued on next page
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 11 of 19 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 36 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.2 16 µg/L 37 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.3 5.2 µg/L 38 Ethylene dibromide < 0.1 0.25 µg/L
39 Hexane (n) < 0.2 51 µg/L 40 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 1 470000 µg/L 41 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 1 140000 µg/L 42 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.2 190 µg/L 43 Methylene Chloride < 0.3 610 µg/L 44 Styrene < 0.1 1300 µg/L 45 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.1 3.3 µg/L 46 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.1 3.2 µg/L 47 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 48 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.3 640 µg/L 49 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.2 4.7 µg/L 50 Trichloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L 51 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.4 2500 µg/L 52 Vinyl Chloride < 0.17 0.5 µg/L 53 Chloride 228,000 2300000 µg/L 54 Chromium VI < 5 140 µg/L 55 Cyanide (CN-) < 2 66 µg/L 56 Mercury < 0.02 0.29 µg/L 57 Barium 126 29000 µg/L 58 Beryllium < 0.5 67 µg/L 59 Boron (total) 133 45000 µg/L 60 Cadmium < 0.2 2.7 µg/L 61 Chromium Total < 2 810 µg/L 62 Cobalt 4.8 66 µg/L 63 Copper 13 87 µg/L 64 Lead < 0.5 25 µg/L 65 Molybdenum 21.9 9200 µg/L 66 Nickel 14.8 490 µg/L 67 Silver < 0.2 1.5 µg/L 68 Thallium < 0.3 510 µg/L 69 Uranium 17 420 µg/L 70 Vanadium 0.9 250 µg/L
...Continued on next page
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 12 of 19 Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
Contaminant Maximum Applicable Site Unit of Name Concentration Condition Standard Measure 71 Zinc < 5 1100 µg/L 72 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L 73 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L
74 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 100 500 µg/L 75 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 100 500 µg/L 76 Benzene < 0.2 44 µg/L 77 Ethylbenzene < 0.2 2300 µg/L 78 Toluene < 0.1 18000 µg/L 79 Xylene Mixture < 0.2 4200 µg/L
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 13 of 19 Remedial Action and Mitigation
Remediated Soils
Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Estimated Quantity of Soil Soil Remediation Process (in-ground volume in m³)
None 0.0
Description of Remediation
Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.
No Contaminants of concern found at the property exceeding the applicable standards. Hence no remediation was required.
Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned
Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0
Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0
Soil Brought to the Property
Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.
Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property 0.0 (in-ground volume in m³)
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 14 of 19 Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.
None
Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.
None
Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 15 of 19 Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures
Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
None
Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
None
Monitoring or Maintenance
Soil Management Measures
Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
None
Ground Water Management Measures
Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
None
Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary
Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC No property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 16 of 19 Qualified Person’s Statements and Certifications
As the qualified person, I certify that:
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary. As of 2012/11/30, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC. Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located. As of 2012/11/30, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment. As of 2012/11/30, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held and my employer TERRAPROBE INC. does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2012/11/30. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, SHAMA M. QURESHI, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/02/24:
a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.
I Agree
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 17 of 19 Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent
The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as part of the record of site condition
Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired
A Current plan of Survey
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model
Owner or agent certification statements
5.2.6
Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 18 of 19 Filed Record of Site Condition # 217028 on 2015/02/27 19 of 19
Request ID: 017367184 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/02/26 Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: 56879179 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 15:53:23 Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie :
CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE
This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère des records of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons Services que la société
1 6 9 2 3 1 0 O N T A R I O L I M I T E D
Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)
0 0 1 6 9 2 3 1 0
is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou née amalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la the laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario. The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le
M A R C H 2 0 M A R S , 2 0 0 6
and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.
Dated Fait le
F E B R U A R Y 2 6 F É V R I E R , 2 0 1 5
Director Directeur
The issuance of this certificate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services. La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux. Township Parcel Not PN Legal Municipal information: We Re: Floor Dear M4V Toronto, 2 Ontario
Environmental The
MINDEN GROSS and St. are available Director 14086-0086 Clair Sirs: Service 1L5 12A Description 2-1, Property: Registered Record the Ministry Ontario of Avenue Section solicitors Address Chinguacousy, Integration LU’ Approvals of (LT) of Site City Part West 43-Ching-3 Owner: the for Condition Environment of of 1692310 Branch Brampton Access Lot designated 1692310 2, (W.H.S.); Concession Ontario Ontario as Part Limited Part 3 of Limited 1, WHS Lot Plan and 2, 43R-2080 designated have Concession been 1, requested as City 3, Part West of Brampton TIT I, to of www.rnindengross.com TEL TORONTO, FILE E-MAIL DIRECTDIAL MINDENGROSSLLP BARRISTERS 145 Plan MERITAS provide Hurontario 416.362.3711 KJNG NUMBER 43R-20801 flEET ON, LAW & the CANADA SOLICITORS dkutnermindengross.com January WEST, FIRMS FAX following Street, 416.864.9223 SUITE M5H WORLDWFDL (416)369-4113 402 7,2015 2200 4044866 F #2012895
MINDEN
David Assessment
DMKJrI
Yours
Should with the
Fee
Nature Authorized
Jack
Registered
10-08-0-011-12754-0000
1692310
MINDEN
GROSS
on
execution
behalf
Simple
this
Eisenberger,
M. truly,
v2
you of I
GROSS
matter. Ontario
4044866
Kutner*
Owner’s
of
Absolute
require
Owner
Roll Signatory
DAVID of
LLPJ
LLP documents
Limited
Number
President
anything
Interest M.
KUTNER
required
of
further, 1692310
PROFESSIONAL
please
to
be
Ontario
executed
do
not Limited,
CoRv0RATI0N
hesitate
on
behalf
is
to
an
contact
of
authorized
1692310
the
writer.
signatory
Ontario
Limited
in
connection
in
connection with Page 2 LRO #43 Transfer Receipted as PR1242625 on 20070417 at 14:11 The applicant(s) hereby applies to the Land Registrar. yyyy mm dd Page 1 of 2 fr’roperties
PIN 14086 - 0086 LT Interest/Estate Fee Simple Description PCL 2-1. SEC 43-CHING-3 (W.H.Sj; PT LT 2, CON 3 WEST OF HURONTARIO ST TOWNSHIP OF CHINGUACOUSY. PT 1. 43R20801: TM PTh 3 & 6, 43R20801 AS IN CH22873; TIW PTS 4 & 5, 43R20801 AS IN 01433625; BRAMPTON Address BRAMPTON
IconsideraUon
Consideration S 0.00
Transferor(s) The transferor(s) hereby transfers the land to the transferee(s).
Name ALTONE INVESTMEPffS LIMITED Address (or Service 3625 Dufferin Street Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M3K 1N4
I. MARK MANDELBAUM, Authorized Signing Officer, have the authority to bind the corporation.
This document is not authorized under Power or Attorney by this party.
Transferee(s) Capacity Share
Name 1692310 ONTARIO LIMITED Address for Service 2430 Deer Run Avenue Oakville, Ontario L6J 61(9
STATEMENT OF THE TRANSFEROR(S): The transferor(s) verifies that to the best of the transferors knowledge and belief, this transfer does not contravene the Planning Act
STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEROR (5): I have explained the effect of the Planning Act to the transferofls) and have made Inquiries of the transferor(s) to determine that this transfer does not contravene that Act and based on the Information supplied by the transferor(s), to the best of my knowledge and belief, this transfer does not contravene that Act I am an Ontano solicitor in good standing. STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEREE(S): I have Investigated the title to this land and to abutting land where relevant and I am satisfied that the title records reveal no contravention as set out In the Planning Act, and to the best of my knowledge and belief this transfer does not contravene the Planning Act. I act Independently of the solicitor for the transferor(s) and I am an Ontano solicItor in good standing.
j Signed By
David Michael Kutner 145 KIng Street West Suite 2200 acting forTransferor(s) Signed 20070416 Toronto MSH 2G5 Tel 4163623711 Fax 4168549223
Joseph John Peter O’Donoghue 555160 Mono-Amaranth Town Line acting forTransferee(s) Signed 2006 1026 Sheibume LON 155 Tel 5199251599 Fax 5199259028
Isubmifted By
J. JOHN O’DONOGHIJE 555160 Mono-Amaranth Town Line 20070417 Sheibume LON 1S5 Tel 5199251599 Fax 5199259028
IF5fl5layment
Statutory Registration Fee $60.00 LRO 1* 43 Transfer Receipted as PR1242625 on 200704 17 at 14:11
The applicant(s) hereby applies to the Land Registrar. vyyv mm dcl Page? o12
lF51Ta1ymet
Land Transfer Tax $0.00
Total Paid $60.00
File Number
Transferor Client File Number: 4008907 LAND TRANSFER TAX STATEMENTS In the matter of the conveyance of: 14086- 0086 PCL 2-1, SEC 43-CHING-3 (W.H.54; PT LT 2. CON 3 WEST OF HURONTARIO ST TOWNSHIP OF CHINGUACOUSY, PT 1, 43R20801;Ta’W PTS 386, 43R20801 AS IN CH22873; T1W Ff54 & 5, 43R20801 AS IN CH33625 BRAMPTON
BY: ALTONE INVESTMENTS LIMITED TO; 1692310 ONTARIO LIMITED %(all PINS)
1. STEVEN RUSE I am ( (a) A person in trust for whom the land conveyed in the above-described conveyance is being conveyed; !i (b) A trustee named In the above-described conveyance to whom the land Is being conveyed; U (c) A transferee named in the above-described conveyance; El (d) The authonzed agent or sollclLor acting in this transacLion for_ described In paragraph(s) U above. ‘ Ce) The President, Vice-President, Manager, Secretary, Director, or Treasurer authorized to act for 1692310 ONTARIO LIMITED described In paragraph(s) Cc) above. 1 (f) A transferee described in paragraph ( ) and am making these statements on my own behalf and on behalf of who is my spouse descibed In paragraph U and as such. I have personal knowledge of the facts herein deposed to.
3. The total consideration for this transaction Is allocated as follows: Ca) Monies paid or to be paid in cash 0.00 (b) Mortgages (i) assumed (show pnncipal and Interest to be credited agaInst purchase price) 0.00 (ii) Given Back to Vendor 0.00 Cc) Property transferred in exchange (detail below) 0.00 Id) Fair market value of the land(s) 0.00 Ce) Liens, legacies, annuities and maintenance charges to which transfer Is subject 0.00 (I) Other valuable consideration subject to land transfer tax (detail below) 0.00 (g) Value of land, building, fixtures and goodwill subiect to land transfer tax (total of (a) to (f)) 0.00 (h) VALUE or ALL CHATTELS - items of tangible personal property 0.00 (i) Other considerations for transactIon not Included In (g) or (h) above 0.00 U) Total consideration 0.00 6. Other remarks and explanations, If necessary. 1. Tax has been paid directly to the Minisby of Finance and documents endoised accordingly as confirmed by receipt no. 577916 (evidence needs to be submitted) PROPERTY InformatIon Record A. Nature of Instrument: Transfer LRO 43 Registration No. PR1242625 Date: 2007104117 B. Property(s); PIN 14086 -0086 Address Assessment - BRAMPTON Roll No C. Address for Service: 2430 Deer Run Avenue Oakville. Ontario L6J 6K9 D. (i) Last Conveyance(s); PIN 14086 -0086 Registration No. null (ii) Legal Descnplion for Property Conveyed: Same as in last conveyance? Yes [] No [] Not known [] E. Tax Statements Prepared By; Joseph John Peter O’Donoghue 555160 Mono-Amaranth Town Line Shelburne LON 155
"TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN" (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)
Location of Area of Media Potentially Potential Potentially Contaminants of Impacted (Ground 2 Area of Potential Environmental Contaminating Activity Location Potential water, soil and/or 1 3 Environmental Concern Concern on Phase of PCA Concern sediment) APEC-1 Along the western Pro perty #30. Fill Material of Unknown Off-Site Metals, Hg, As, Soil Historical and current boundary Quality. Along the Sb, Se, B-HWS, Ground water presence of railway lines Others: Possible product loss western Na, Cl-, Cr(VI), adjacent to the west boundary from the rail containers Property EC, SAR, PAHs of the Property. Fill materials boundary were likely used to raise the site grade for railway tracks and embankment. APEC-2 Along the south Property #28 Gasoline and Associated Off-Site Petroleum Soil Historical and current boundary Products Storage in Fixed Tanks South of the hydrocarbons PHC Ground water presence of fuel storage tank Property (F1-F4) and BTEX at the southern adjoining property (8157 Churchville Road).
Notes: 1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through, (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity. 2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a phase one study area 3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below: ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI) 1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury - OCs BTEX Cl high pH - PHCs Ca, Mg CN low pH 4 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l’Environnement au 1-800-461-6290 APPENDIX A "TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY" (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)
Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use1 Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Property Use Insurance Plans, Etc.
From 13 March 1821 to East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No records documenting land use prior to 1954 were 31 August 1821 available West Half: Robert Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 31 August 1821 to East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 03 November 1834 West Half: Timothy Street No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 03 November 1834 East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 18 November 1858 West Half: Jacob Snarl No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 18 November 1858 East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 18 November 1858 West Half: Jacob Snure No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 18 November 1858 East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 22 December 1859 West Half: George Snure No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 22 December 1859 East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 13 December 1861 West Half: Wesley Todd No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 13 December 1861 East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 26 December 1861 West Half: George W. Snure No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 26 December 1861 East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 05 November 1863 West Half: Jacob Snure No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 05 November 1863 East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 20 November 1866 West Half: Quebec Bank No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 20 November 1866 East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 20 November 1866 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use1 Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Property Use Insurance Plans, Etc.
West Half: Noah Banhart No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 20 November 1866 East Half: Jonathan Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 10 November 1871 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 10 November 1871 East Half: George Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 12 July 1877 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 12 July 1877 to 16 East Half: James Fleming No info available Agriculture or other use No info available July 1877 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 16 July 1877 to 15 East Half: John A. Trimble No info available Agriculture or other use No info available October 1883 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 15 October 1883 to East Half: Hiram D. Lef. No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 12 October 1885 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 12 October 1885 to East Half: William Hall No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 31 March 1886 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 31 March 1886 to East Half: William Wilson No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 04 October 1887 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 04 October 1887 to East Half: William B. Smith No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 21 October 1887 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 21 October 1887 to East Half: Mary A. Hassard No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 26 October 1889 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 26 October 1889 to East Half: Matthias Ingram No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 18 April 1901 West Half: Kenneth Chisholm No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 18 April 1901 to 28 East Half: Matthias Ingram No info available Agriculture or other use No info available February 1911 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use1 Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Property Use Insurance Plans, Etc.
West Half: Mary A. Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 28 February 1911 East Half: Matthias Ingram No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 15 March 1915 West Half: Erlin E. Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 15 March 1915 to East Half: Russell Robertson No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 10 April 1917 West Half: Erlin E. Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 10 April 1917 to 12 East Half: Russell Robertson No info available Agriculture or other use No info available January 1920 West Half: Wesley Weech No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 12 January 1920 to East Half: Stella K. Narper No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 18 March 1920 West Half: Wesley Weech No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 18 March 1920 to East Half: William G. Green No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 04 January 1921 West Half: Wesley Weech No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 04 January 1921 to East Half: William G. Green No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 04 January 1921 West Half: Erlin E. Copeland No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 04 January 1921 to East Half: William G. Green No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 04 January 1921 West Half: Wesley Weech No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 04 January 1921 to East Half: William G. Green No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 03 September 1932 West Half: David Powrie No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 03 September 1932 East Half: William G. Green No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 20 November 1941 West Half: William Dunseath No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 20 November 1941 East Half: William H. Green No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 31 March 1942 West Half: William Dunseath No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 31 March 1942 to East Half: Robert Charlton No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 19 August 1943 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use1 Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Property Use Insurance Plans, Etc.
West Half: William Dunseath No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 19 August 1943 to East Half: Robert Charlton No info available Agriculture or other use No info available 30 November 1946 West Half: Jacob Rohrer No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 30 November 1946 East Half: Robert Charlton No info available Agriculture or other use No info available to 09 June 1948 West Half: Robert T. Charlton No info available Agriculture or other use No info available
From 09 June 1948 to 01 East Half: Robert Charlton Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1954 – Property is undeveloped, agricultural field September 1964 present West Half: Mary E. Denison, Henry L. Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1954 – Property is undeveloped, agricultural field Denison present From 01 September 1964 East Half: Robert C. Charlton Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1971 – No apparent changes to land use on to 30 November 1972 Property West Half: Robert C. Charlton Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1971 – No apparent changes to land use on Property From 30 November 1972 East Half: Calmist Holdings Limited Undeveloped Agriculture or other use No other observations or information to 31 January 1973 West Half: Calmist Holdings Limited Undeveloped Agriculture or other use No other observations or information
From 31 January 1973 to East Half: Altone Investments Limited Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1978 – No apparent changes to land use on 17 April 2007 Property West Half: Altone Investments Limited Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 1978 – No apparent changes to land use on Property From 17 April 2007 to 1692310 Ontario Limited Undeveloped Agriculture or other use AP 2009 – No apparent changes to land use on Present (both East and West Half) Property
Notes: 1 - for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies: Agriculture or other use Commercial use Community use Industrial use Institutional use Parkland use Residential use 2 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère matière de changement climatique de l’Environnement et de l’Action en au 1-800-461-629
Terraprobe Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering Construction Materials Inspection & Testing
PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION CVSP BLOCK 6, ALTONE WEST BRAMPTON, ONTARIO
File No. 13-12-2042 January 31, 2013 Updated: November 13, 2014
©Terraprobe Inc.
Terraprobe Inc. Greater Toronto Hamilton – Niagara Central Ontario Northern Ontario 11 Indell Lane 903 Barton Street, Unit 22 220 Bayview Drive, Unit 25 1012 Kelly Lake Rd., Unit 1 Brampton, Ontario L6T 3Y3 Stoney Creek, Ontario L8E 5P5 Barrie, Ontario L4N 4Y8 Sudbury, Ontario P3E 5P4 (905) 796-2650 Fax: 796-2250 (905) 643-7560 Fax: 643-7559 (705) 739-8355 Fax: 739-8369 (705) 670-0460 Fax: 670-0558 www.terraprobe.ca
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Property Description ...... 1 1.2 Current and Future Uses of the Property ...... 2 1.3 Applicable Site Condition Standards ...... 2
2.0 INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ...... 3 2.1 Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity Has Occurred ...... 3 2.2 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern ...... 3 2.3 Subsurface Structures and Utilities ...... 5
3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ...... 6 3.1 Physical Setting ...... 6 3.2 Site Stratigraphy ...... 6 3.3 Site Hydrogeological Characteristics ...... 7 3.4 Approximate Depth to Bedrock ...... 7 3.5 Approximate Depth to Water Table ...... 7 3.6 Section 41 or 43.1 ...... 10 3.7 Soil Placed On, In or Under the Phase Two Property ...... 10 3.8 Proposed Buildings ...... 10
4.0 CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ...... 11 4.1 Summary of Sampling Plan ...... 11 4.2 Sampling Program Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures ...... 12 4.3 Contaminants Associated with Each Area ...... 13 4.4 Medium in Which Contaminant are Associated ...... 14 4.5 Information Known about Each Contaminated Area ...... 14 4.6 Distribution of Contaminant ...... 14 4.7 Reasons for Discharge of Contaminants ...... 14 4.8 Migration of Contaminants ...... 14 4.9 Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration ...... 15 4.10 Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings ...... 15 4.11 Relevant Construction Features of Buildings ...... 15 4.12 Building HVAC ...... 15
5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS...... 16 5.1 Receptor Human Health ...... 16 5.2 Receptor Terrestrial Environment ...... 16 5.3 Receptor Ecological Environment ...... 17
Terraprobe Page No. ii
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
ATTACHMENT: Attachment A: Survey Plan
FIGURES: Figure 1 – Site Location Plan Figure 2 – CSM &Area of Potential Environmental Concern Figure 3 – Borehole/Monitoring Well & Cross -Section Location Plan Figure 4 – Cross Section A-A’ Figure 5 – Cross Section B-B’ Figure 6 – Soil and Ground Water Quality Figure 7 – Ground Water Flow Direction Figure 8 – Pathways and Receptors
Terraprobe Page No. iii
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following document presents the Phase Two Conceptual Site Model for the Property located at CVSP Block 6, Altone West in Brampton, Ontario. The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model is part of the report titled “Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario”, January 31, 2013, prepared by Terraprobe Inc. A Phase One ESA Update was completed for the Property on November 4, 2014 per our report entitled “Phase One ESA Update, CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario”, November 4, 2014. Based on the Phase One ESA Update, the Phase Two ESA was updated on November 13, 2014.
1.1 Property Description
The Phase Two Property is located on the east side of Churchville Road in the City of Brampton. The Property is located approximately 100 m east of Churchville Road, 0.6 km west of Chinguacousy Road and north of Steeles Avenue West. The Property is an approximately triangular shaped parcel of undeveloped land that covers an area of approximately 4.9 ha (approximately 12 acres). The Property is located in a mixed residential, parkland and farmland area of the City of Brampton. The location of the Property is shown in Figure 1. General site features are presented in the Survey Plan (Appendix A), prepared by J. D. Barnes Limited, Ontario Land Surveyor, dated April 10, 2013.
The Phase One Property was undeveloped, covered with natural vegetation including tall grass, bushes and trees. The Property is proposed to be developed as a residential sub-division consisting of town houses, access roads and parking areas.
The Property information is provided in the following Table.
Municipal Address No Municipal Address Yet Property Identified As CVSP Block 6, Altone West in Brampton, Ontario Part of Lot 2, Concession 3, West of Hurontario Street Legal Description Designated as Part 1, Plan 43R-20801 Geographic Township of Chinguacousy, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel PIN 14086-0086 Assessment Roll No. 10-08-0-011-12754-0000 Zoning Type A agricultural
1692310 Ontario Limited President: Mr. Jack Eisenberger Address: Property Owner 501-5400 Yonge Street Information Toronto, ON M2N 5R5 Tel: 416-227-9005 Fax: 416-227-9007 Email: Jack Eisenberger [email protected]
Terraprobe Page No 1
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
1.2 Current and Future Uses of the Property
The current use of the Property is agricultural. The Property is proposed to be developed as a residential subdivision consisting of town houses.
The land use of the adjoining and surrounding areas is summarized below:
Direction from Property Current Typical Land Use
North Vacant –Agricultural- Open Space, Flood Plan Hydro transmission Line, Agricultural, Open Space, Flood Plan (Totten Valley), East new residential development along James Potter Road South Agricultural (8157 Churchville Road), Flood Plan (Kee Valley) CPR-CNR rail lines, vacant – Flood Plan, Residential houses along Churchville West Road
1.3 Applicable Site Condition Standards
The applicable Site Condition Standards for the Subject Property were considered to be those contained in Table 3 of the April 15, 2011 Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” for residential/park land/institutional) property use in a non-potable ground water condition for coarse textured soil (Table 3 RPI Standards). These are considered to be the applicable Standards for the property based on the following reasons:
The entire Property is currently undeveloped. The proposed land use for the Property will be residential. Therefore residential Standards would apply to the subject site. The proposed development will be serviced by Region of Peel for municipal piped water and sanitary sewers. The adjoining new developed properties are municipally serviced with municipal piped water by the City of Brampton. The City of Brampton obtains its drinking water from lake water sources. Therefore, non-potable ground water Standards would apply.
Based upon the above rationale, it is determined that the applicable soil and ground water standards are found in Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Table 3 (Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards for R/P/I Property Use in a non-Potable Ground Water Condition).
No exceedances of the MOE Table 3 standards were identified in any of the soil or ground water samples analyzed. Based on the laboratory results, no contaminants of concern (COC) are present at the Property.
Terraprobe Page No 2
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
2.0 INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
2.1 Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity Has Occurred
No potentially contaminating activities (PCAs) were identified for the Phase One Property.
Two off-site PCAs were identified within the Phase One Study Area as described below:
#28-Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks. Historical and current presence of above ground heating oil storage tank at the southern adjoining property (8157 Churchville Road). The Contaminants of Potential Concern (CoPCs) are petroleum hydrocarbon (PHCs). The CoCs may have impacted the soil and ground water.
#30- Fill Material of Unknown Quality. Historical and current presence of railway lines adjacent to the west boundary of the Property. Fill materials were likely used to raise the site grade for railway tracks and embankment. The Contaminants of Concern (COCs) are metals & inorganics, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The CoPCs may have impacted the soil and ground water.
2.2 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern
The Areas of Potential Environmental Concern are presented on Figure 2. The following Table summarizes the potential environmental concerns identified for the Phase One Property.
Terraprobe Page No 3
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
"Table of Areas Of Potential Environmental Concern" (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)
The following table summarizes the potential environmental concerns identified in the Phase One Study Area.
Area of Potential Location of Area of Potentially Contaminating Location of PCA Contaminants of Media Potentially Environmental Concern Potential Activity (on-site or off-site) 3 Impacted (Ground Potential Concern Environmental water, soil and/or Concern on Phase sediment) One Property APEC-1 Along the western #30. Fill Material of Unknown Off-Site Along the Metals, Hg, As, Sb, Se, Soil Historical and current presence of railway Property boundary Quality. western Property B-HWS, Na, Cl-, Ground water lines adjacent to the west boundary of the Others: Possible product loss boundary Cr(VI), EC, SAR, PAHs Property. Fill materials were likely used to from the rail containers raise the site grade for railway tracks and embankment. APEC-2 Along the south #28 Gasoline and Associated Off-Site South of the Petroleum Soil Historical and current presence of fuel Property boundary Products Storage in Fixed Property hydrocarbons PHC Ground water storage tank at the southern adjoining Tanks (F1-F4)+ BTEX property (8157 Churchville Road).
Terraprobe Page No 4
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
2.3 Subsurface Structures and Utilities
Various utility agencies were contacted to identify buried services on public land in the vicinity of the subject Property. A private locator was retained to survey the proposed borehole locations for buried services. The Property is undeveloped and includes no underground utilities for contamination transport purposes. Based upon this, it is unlikely that any potentially contaminated ground water would migrate along the utilities; and the potential that underground utility trenches in the area may affect contaminant distribution and transport is unlikely.
Terraprobe Page No 5
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY
3.1 Physical Setting
The Phase One Property and Study Area are located in a mixed parkland, residential and agricultural area of Brampton.
Based on the 1982 Ontario Base Map information the ground surface is at approximately 195 m geodetic elevation that decreases towards the east, west and south. The Property is located approximately 120 metres above the level of Lake Ontario. The site topography is naturally undulating and generally slopes to the southwest and to the southeast.
According the topographic map of the site (Map 30 M/12, 7th Edition, Brampton), which covers the Property, the ground surface at the vicinity of the Property slopes in a southwesterly direction. The nearest water features are, the Credit River located approximately 0.5 km southwest of the Property and an unnamed tributary of the Credit River located approximately 100 m east and south of the Property boundary. Regionally, the ground surface slopes down to the southeast.
According to the geological map entitled “Quaternary Geology of Ontario-Southern Sheet” Map 2556, published by the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, dated 1991, the overburden in the region of the subject property consists of Halton Till from the Ontario-Erie Lobe. This material is generally characterized as a silt to silty-clay till matrix.
According to Map 2176, Brampton Area, Southern Ontario, Industrial Mineral Resource Sheet, dated 1966, prepared by Ontario, Department of Mines, the Phase One Property is located in area that consists of clay or silt till of Wisconsinan formation of Pleistocene.
According to the bedrock geology map entitled “Bedrock Geology of Ontario-Southern Sheet” published by the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, dated 1991, the bedrock in the area consists of Upper Ordovician, Queenston Formation. The Queenston Formation, consists of shale, limestone, dolostone and siltstone.
3.2 Site Stratigraphy
The stratigraphic conditions at the site have been assessed on the basis of sampled boreholes, and grain- size analysis. Approximate borehole/monitoring well locations are identified on Figure 3.
The stratigraphy encountered at the Property is described below and shown on Figures 6A and 6B:
Surficial Materials: The ground surface was covered with grass and a veneer of topsoil at each borehole locations.
Terraprobe Page No 6
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
Fill materials/ Disturbed Native. Possible fill materials/weathered native soils consisting of sand to silty sand with trace amounts of clay and gravel and inclusion of natural organics (rootlets) were encountered at each borehole location to maximum depth of 0.6 m to 1.2 m below the existing grade. The fill/disturbed native layer was underlain by undisturbed native soil deposits. The fill material/disturbed native soils was generally moist. No staining or odours were noted in any of the soil samples obtained from the fill/disturbed native layer.
Native soils. All boreholes penetrated into undisturbed native soil deposits. Generally, the native soils consisted of moist sand to silty sand trace clay and trace gravel to depths of 1.2 to 2.4 m below existing grades. The sandy material was underlain by moist to wet clayey silt to silty clay with trace amounts of sand and gravel and extended to the full depth of investigation to 15.9 m below grade. No staining or odours were noted in any of the native soil samples.
Bedrock. Bedrock was not encountered at any of the borehole locations.
3.3 Site Hydrogeological Characteristics
A hydraulic gradient based on the limited number of monitoring events may be unreliable, and thus one was not provided herein.
According to Freeze and Cherry (1979) and the Ministry of the Environment (1997), the typical hydraulic conductivity of the strata investigated is:
Sand: 10-4 m/s to 10-6 m/s
Silty Sand: 10-5 m/s to 10-7 m/s
Clayey Silt: 10-7 m/s to 10-9 m/s
Clay: 10-9 m/s to 10-10 m/s
3.4 Approximate Depth to Bedrock
Based on the published information, the bedrock in the area consists of the Queenston Formation which consists of shale, limestone, dolostone and siltstone. According to the borehole logs, the depth to bedrock at the location of the Property is over 15.9 m.
3.5 Approximate Depth to Water Table
The approximate elevation of the ground water table with reference to an assume benchmark of 100 m ranges from 83.90to 97.01 mbgs.
Terraprobe Page No 7
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
The ground water elevations are shown on Cross Sections A-A’ and B-B’ (Figures 4 and 5). The ground water elevations and flow direction are shown on Figure 7.
Well Ground Borehole Borehole Water Borehole Water Borehole Water Borehole Water Water Elevation Depth (m) water level Depth Depth Depth Depth Depth Depth Depth Depth Elevation (m) Nov. 5 & 6, Nov. 13, Nov. 13, Nov. 22, Nov. 22, Nov. 30, Nov. 30, Jan. 10, Jan. 10, (*mbgs) 2012 2012 (m) 2012 (m) 2012 (m) 2012 (m) 2012 (m) 2012 (m) 2013 (m) 2013 (m) MW/ 98.890 15.9 15.02 13.09 15.2 12.95 15.24 13.04 15.15 13.02 85.87 BH1 Dry MW/ 99.235 5.2 5.2 5.09 5.2 3.18 5.29 2.29 5.24 2.17 97.065 BH2 Dry MW/ 99.685 13.7 13.7 Dry 13.8 Dry 13.8 Dry 13.75 13.72 85.965 BH3 Dry MW/ 92.815 6.7 6.08 Dry 6.14 5.32 6.14 4.29 6.06 1.82 90.995 BH4 Dry MW/ 88.825 6.7 6.07 Dry 6.12 Dry 6.12 Dry 6.07 4.92 83.905 BH5 Dry *Note: mbgs - meter below ground surface Groundwater depth is depth metre below ground surface (mbgs) The ground surface elevations were referenced to a local benchmark (assumed elevation 100m), located at west corner of hydro tower in field.
Terraprobe Page No 8
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
3.6 Section 41 or 43.1
Section 41 of the regulation (Environmentally Sensitive Areas) is not applicable to the Phase Two Property. The site is not considered to be a ‘sensitive’ site under O. Reg. 153/04. Section 43.1of the regulation (within 30 m of a natural water body), as described under O.Reg.153/04. Therefore, the applicable Site Condition Standards for the Subject Property were considered to be those contained in Table 3 of the April 15, 2011 Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” for residential/park land/institutional) property use in a non-potable ground water condition for coarse textured soil (Table 3 RPI Standards).
The proposed development will be serviced by Region of Peel for municipal piped water and sanitary sewers. The adjoining new developed properties are municipally serviced with municipal piped water by the City of Brampton. The City of Brampton obtains its drinking water from lake water sources. Therefore, non-potable ground water Standards would apply. Therefore, non-potable ground water Standards would apply.
3.7 Soil Placed On, In or Under the Phase Two Property
No soils have been imported or placed on, in or under the Phase Two Property since the Phase One ESA was completed in January 2013. Soils may be placed on the Property as part of the future development. The quality of the any imported soil material must meet the applicable Table 3 RPI standards.
3.8 Proposed Buildings
The Property will be developed as a residential sub-division consisting of town houses, access roads and parking areas. The proposed development will be serviced by Region of Peel for municipal piped water and sanitary sewers.
Terraprobe Page No 10
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
4.0 CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY
The APECs identified in the Phase One ESA were investigated in the Phase Two ESA; and soil and ground water samples were collected and tested for contaminants of potential concern (COPC). The parameters analyzed for soil and ground water samples included: petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs fraction F1 to F4), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals and inorganics parameters. Based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, the potential contaminants of concern for the Phase Two Property included the following:
Soil: Metals, As, Sb, Se Cr (VI), Hg, Electrical Conductivity, Sodium Adsorption Ratio, PHC (F1-F4), and PAHs
Ground Water: Metals, PHC (F1-F4), VOCs and PAHs
4.1 Summary of Sampling Plan
The sampling program was developed with regards to the potentially contaminating activities identified in the Phase One Conceptual Site Model. The sampling program involved investigation of soil and ground water quality across the Phase Two Property. The analytical parameters included petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, metals and inorganic parameters, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. This range of parameters addressed all of the COPC identified for the Property.
The table below summarizes the sampling program conducted by Terraprobe and the number of samples analyzed. In addition, duplicates samples; field blanks and trip blanks were analysed for ground water samples as per the QA/QC protocols.
Scope of Scope of Scope of Date Soil Ground Water Investigation Analysis Analysis
5 boreholes 6 M&I November drilled analyses 3 M&I analyses 2012 to Jan 5 monitoring 1 PHC+BTEX 4 PHC+BTEX 2013 well installed analyses analyses AGAT 3 set of 4 PAH 3 VOC analyses Laboratory water levels analyses 4 PAH analyses from 5 wells
*Note: above-noted table does not include QA/QC samples including trip blank and field blank samples
The following is summary of the findings of the Phase Two ESA conducted for CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton:
The Phase Two ESA consisted of drilling five (5) boreholes and installing monitoring well in each of the boreholes to collect representative samples at the Property.
Terraprobe Page No 11
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
A total of eleven (11) soil samples including quality control (QC) duplicates were analysed for PHCs (F1-F4), PAHs, and metals and inorganic parameters. A total of four (4) ground water samples including quality control (QC) duplicates were analysed for PHCs (F1-F4), VOCs, PAHs, and metals and inorganic parameters. The results of the samples submitted for chemical analysis were compared to the full depth generic site condition standards in a non-potable ground water condition for coarse textured soil as contained in Table 3 of the Ministry of Environment (MOE) publication “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” for residential/parkland/institutional (RPI) use, April 15, 2011. No exceedances of the applicable Standards for parameters analysed were found in any of the soil samples tested. Ground water samples collected from three monitoring location met the applicable Table 3 Standards for all parameters analysed. As a result, groundwater at, in, under the property meets the applicable MOE Table 3 standards.
4.2 Sampling Program Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures
Soil and ground water samples obtained during the investigations were handled in accordance with generally accepted professional practices under the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act and the MOE Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario.
Laboratory-supplied sample containers, containing the appropriate preservatives as required by the given analyses, were used for all sampling conducted on the Property.
All sample containers were labelled accordingly to identify the sample location. Documentation related to sample location, depth, and time of sampling was recorded for each sample. The samples were immediately placed in coolers packed with ice.
Until delivery to the analytical laboratory, custody of the samples was maintained by Terraprobe. Terraprobe transferred custody of the samples for analysis to AGAT Laboratories within an adequate time frame to ensure ‘hold times’ would be within the acceptable criteria. Chain of Custody forms identifying the samples and analyses were submitted to the respective laboratory to document the transfer of custody.
Quality control samples included field duplicates and blanks. The following quality control measures were implemented for this investigation.
A clean pair of disposable latex gloves was used for each sample (soil and ground water) that was collected. During sampling, non-dedicated sampling equipment (split spoon barrel sampler, shovel, auger, trowels) were washed prior to re-use. Ground water samples were collected using Mega Masson Submersible pump.
Terraprobe Page No 12
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
Soil and ground water field duplicates were submitted at a frequency of one duplicate sample for every 10 samples. The field instruments were calibrated prior to use.
There were no deviations from the procedures set out in the quality assurance and quality control program set out in the sampling and analysis plan.
Laboratory sample analyses were provided by AGAT Laboratories of Mississauga, Ontario. AGAT Laboratories is accredited by the Standards Council of Canada and Canadian Association for Environmental Laboratories in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025 (1999) for the parameters tested in the investigation.
The quality assurance and quality control program includes a collection of field duplicates, trip blanks and trip spikes. In addition, AGAT Laboratories included a standard internal QA/QC program consisting of the analysis of replicates and assessment of surrogate recoveries.
Based on a review of the field and laboratory QA/QC data, there are no issues that would affect the quality of the laboratory data or interpretation of the results.
4.3 Contaminants Associated with Each Area
The applicable Site Condition Standards (SCS) for the Subject Property were considered to be those contained in Table 3 of the April 15, 2011 Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” for residential/park land/institutional) property use in a non-potable ground water condition for coarse textured soil (Table 3 RPI Standards). The pH of the surficial and sub-surficial soil ranged between 6.18 to 8.02. This pH range is within the MOE range of 5.0 to 9 for surface soil (up to 1.5 m depth) and 5.0 to 11 for sub-surface soil (over 1.5 m depth).The results of the samples submitted for chemical analysis were compared to the MOE Table 3.
Investigation was completed at the areas of potential environmental concern and COPC were assessed based on the laboratory analyses. The contaminants of concern associated with each area of the property are identified in Table 4.3-1 below:
Table 4.3-1 Results of Chemical Testing and Contaminated of Concern
COPC Tested Earth Fill/Disturbed Native Ground Water COC Present and Native Soil Yes/No
Metals and All analyzed parameters meet All analyzed parameters meet No Inorganic SCS SCS Parameters VOCs No COPC identified in soil All analyzed parameters No remained below laboratory minimum detection limits
Terraprobe Page No 13
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
PAHs All analyzed parameters All analyzed parameters No remained below laboratory remained below laboratory minimum detection limits minimum detection limits
PHC (F1-F4) & All analyzed parameters All analyzed parameters No BTEX remained below laboratory remained below laboratory minimum detection limits minimum detection limits
Contaminants in Soil: No exceedances of the applicable SCS for any parameter were found in any soil samples analyzed.
Contaminants in Ground Water: No exceedances of the applicable SCS for any parameter were found in any ground water samples analyzed.
There are no contaminants present at the Property. Figures 4 and 5 represent the sampling locations and the results of soil and ground water respectively.
4.4 Medium in Which Contaminant are Associated
The COPC were associated with soil and ground water. Phase Two investigation has confirmed that there are no contaminants present at the Property.
4.5 Information Known about Each Contaminated Area
No contaminated areas were encountered in the Phase Two ESA investigation.
4.6 Distribution of Contaminant
There are no contaminants present at the Property. No contaminated areas were encountered in the Phase Two ESA investigation; hence distribution of contaminants is unlikely.
4.7 Reasons for Discharge of Contaminants
No contaminants were found at the Property.
4.8 Migration of Contaminants
There are no contaminants present at the Property. No contaminated areas were encountered in the Phase Two ESA investigation; hence distribution and migration of contaminants is unlikely.
The proposed residential sub-division will include town houses and one level of basement structure. It is anticipated that underground services will be above the water table. As such the utilities do not offer a pathway for contamination to migrate and enter the ground water table.
Terraprobe Page No 14
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
4.9 Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration
The climatic conditions and fluctuations in the groundwater levels have a negligible effect on the migration of contaminants within the groundwater as no large temporal fluctuations in the groundwater levels were measured.
4.10 Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings
No potential for soil vapour intrusion is identified.
There is no impact identified with the soil or ground water at the Property.
4.11 Relevant Construction Features of Buildings
No building is currently present at the Property. The proposed residential sub-division will include town houses and one level of basement structure.
4.12 Building HVAC
The proposed residential sub-division will include town-houses. The town houses will have independent air condition systems. There is no impact identified with the soil or ground water at the Property, hence any intrusion and distribution of soil vapors through the air conditioning system is unlikely.
Terraprobe Page No 15
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS
The conceptual model for the current site conditions is shown in Figure 8. Figure 8 is a graphical representation of potential pathways and receptors and does not have a scale or orientation which can be related to the Phase Two Property.The potential sources pathways and receptors are summarized below:
5.1 Receptor Human Health
Contaminant Potential Source Potential Risks of Concern Pathways
Soil Ingestion No Risk- No Source
Fill None Soil Inhalation No Risk- No Source Soil Skin Contact No Risk- No Source Soil Ingestion No Risk- No Source Native Soil None Soil Inhalation No Risk- No Source Soil Skin Contact No Risk- No Source Ground water No Risk- No Source Ground Ingestion None Water Ground water Skin No Risk- No Source Contact
5.2 Receptor Terrestrial Environment
Contaminant Potential Source Potential Risks of Concern Pathways
Soil Ingestion No Risk- No Source
Fill None Soil Inhalation No Risk- No Source Soil Skin Contact No Risk- No Source Root uptake No Risk- No receptor surface water Soil Ingestion No Risk- No Source Soil Inhalation No Risk- No Source Native Soil None Ingestion of No Risk- No Source prey/food Ground water No Risk- No Source Ground None Ingestion Water Root Uptake No Risk- No Source
Terraprobe Page No 16
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model November 13, 2014 CVSP Block 6, Altone West, Brampton, Ontario File No. 13-12-2042-2
5.3 Receptor Ecological Environment Source Contaminant Potential of Concern Pathways Potential Risks
Ground None Gill Uptake No Risk- No Source. Water Water Ingestion No Risk- No Source.
Prey/Food No Risk- No Source. Ingestion
Terraprobe Page No 17
FIGURES
TERRAPROBE INC.