DOCSLIB.ORG

Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes: a Magnitude 9.0 Earthquake Scenario

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes: a Magnitude 9.0 Earthquake Scenario CCaassccaaddiiaa SSuubbdduuccttiioonn ZZoonnee EEaarrtthhqquuaakkeess:: AA MMaaggnniittuuddee 99..00 EEaarrtthhqquuaakkee SScceennaarriioo Update, 2013 Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup Also available as Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular 116, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report 0-13-22, and British Columbia Geological Survey Information Circular 2013-3 Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup (CREW) CREW is a non-profit coalition of business people, emergency managers, scientists, engineers, civic leaders, and government officials who are working together to reduce the effects of earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest. Executive Board President: John Schelling, Washington Emergency Management Division Vice President: Michael Kubler, Emergency Management, Providence Health & Services, Portland, OR Past President: Cale Ash, Degenkolb Engineers Secretary: Teron Moore, Emergency Management, British Columbia Treasurer: Timothy Walsh, State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Executive Director: Heidi Kandathil Board of Directors Steven Bibby, Security and Emergency Services, BC Housing Josh Bruce, Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience Kathryn Forge, Public Safety Canada Jere High, Oregon State Public Health Division Andre LeDuc, University of Oregon Charlie Macaulay, Global Risk Consultants Ines Pearce, Pearce Global Partners Althea Rizzo, Oregon Emergency Management Bill Steele, University of Washington, Pacific Northwest Seismic Network Yumei Wang, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Supporting members Tamra Biasco, FEMA, Region X Craig Weaver, U.S. Geological Survey Joan Gomberg, U.S. Geological Survey Nate Wood, U.S. Geological Survey Acknowledgments CREW would like to thank Tamra Biasco and Joan Gomberg for overseeing the development of this updated edition of Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes: A Magnitude 9.0 Earthquake Scenario. We would also like to thank everyone who shared information and materials or contributed their time and expertise to this project. CREW extends special thanks to Tim Walsh for his many contributions to the project’s final stages of review and development. Support for this publication was provided by FEMA, Department of Homeland Security, under the National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) State Cooperative Agreements. Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of FEMA or the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Writing and editing support was provided by Dr. Kyra L. Nourse. Approved by the CREW Board of Directors on September 6, 2013. Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes: A Magnitude 9.0 Earthquake Scenario Update, 2013 Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup CONTENTS One Day in Cascadia ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Discovering Our Region’s Earthquake Profile ......................................................................................................... 2 Tectonic Collision Zone ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 On the Trail of the Biggest Quake of All .............................................................................................................................. 4 Anatomy of a Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake ............................................................................................ 5 The Locked Zone Breaks ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 The Earthquake Hits ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 A Tsunami is Born ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 What Are the Odds? ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 Predicting the Effects of The Next Big Earthquake ................................................................................................. 8 If the Earthquake Happens Tomorrow.... ............................................................................................................................ 8 How Will Essential Infrastructure Perform? ...................................................................................................................... 10 What Will Happen to Buildings? ........................................................................................................................................ 13 What Will Happen to Communities on the Coast? ............................................................................................................ 15 Earthquake and Tsunami Refugees ................................................................................................................................... 16 Other Far-Reaching Impacts of a Cascadia Earthquake and Tsunami ............................................................................... 17 Preparing for the Big One...................................................................................................................................... 18 Risk Assessment ................................................................................................................................................................ 18 Raising Awareness ............................................................................................................................................................. 19 Resilience Planning and Mitigation Strategies .................................................................................................................. 19 Engineering for Earthquakes ............................................................................................................................................. 20 Earthquake Early Warning Systems ................................................................................................................................... 21 Preparing for Tsunamis ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 Living in Cascadia .................................................................................................................................................. 23 Next Steps Forward ........................................................................................................................................................... 23 130°w 120° The stuck, or 'locked' part of the interface between the North American and subducting plates - the fault that breaks in great 50°N Vancouver earthquakes. 0 The seaward edge of the subduction zone, where the subducting plates 0 begin their descent Seattle beneath the North American Plate. Juan 0 de Fuca Portland Spreading ridges where Plate o/4 plates separate and North injected magma forms new oceanic crust. America Pacific Plate Plate 40° Vertical faults oriented Pacific Ocean so plates move parallel \ to one another. l 0 500 km I I THE CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE: The geography of northern California, Oregon, Washington, and southern British Columbia is shaped by the Cascadia subduction zone, where the North American Plate collides with a number of smaller plates: the largest of these is the Juan de Fuca Plate, flanked by the Explorer Plate to the north and the Gorda plate to the south. These smaller plates “subduct” (descend) beneath the North American Plate as they converge along a 700-mile long (1,130 km) boundary. A large portion of the boundary between the subducting and overriding plates resists the convergent motion, until this part of the boundary breaks in a great earthquake. Above: Schematic view of the source area for the largest Cascadia earthquakes. (Image adapted from U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1707 (page 8), Atwater et al., http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1707/) ONE DAY IN CASCADIA Photo by Writegeist Photo by It’s 8:16 on a chilly, wet morning in early spring. You’ve just arrived at work and are pouring a cup of coffee when you become aware of a low rumbling noise. Within seconds, the rumbling becomes a roar, the floor beneath you heaves, and the building begins to pitch and shake so violently that you’re thrown to the floor. The roaring is joined by a cacophony of crashing as windows shatter and every unsecured object in the room—from the desk chair to the coffee pot—is sent flying. Shaken loose by the shuddering and jolting of the building, dust and ceiling particles drift down like snow. Then the lights flicker and go out. Remembering to “drop, cover, and hold,” you crawl under the nearest table, hold on tight, and tell yourself that the shaking should last only a few seconds more . but it goes on and on. This is it: the Big One. The Cascadia subduction zone has just unleashed a magnitude 9.0 earthquake. Are you prepared? IF YOU LIVE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, WASHINGTON, OREGON, OR BRITISH COLUMBIA, YOU LIVE IN CASCADIA, a region remarkable for its stunning mountain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ocean Trench
    R E S O U R C E L I B R A R Y E N C Y C L O P E D I C E N T RY Ocean trench Ocean trenches are long, narrow depressions on the seafloor. These chasms are the deepest parts of the ocean—and some of the deepest natural spots on Earth. G R A D E S 5 - 12+ S U B J E C T S Earth Science, Geology, Geography, Physical Geography C O N T E N T S 11 Images, 1 Video, 2 Links For the complete encyclopedic entry with media resources, visit: http://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/ocean-trench/ Ocean trenches are long, narrow depressions on the seafloor. These chasms are the deepest parts of the ocean—and some of the deepest natural spots on Earth. Ocean trenches are found in every ocean basin on the planet, although the deepest ocean trenches ring the Pacific as part of the so-called “Ring of Fire” that also includes active volcanoes and earthquake zones. Ocean trenches are a result of tectonic activity, which describes the movement of the Earth’s lithosphere. In particular, ocean trenches are a feature of convergent plate boundaries, where two or more tectonic plates meet. At many convergent plate boundaries, dense lithosphere melts or slides beneath less-dense lithosphere in a process called subduction, creating a trench. Ocean trenches occupy the deepest layer of the ocean, the hadalpelagic zone. The intense pressure, lack of sunlight, and frigid temperatures of the hadalpelagic zone make ocean trenches some of the most unique habitats on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Juan De Fuca's Strait
    REVIEW ESSAY Navigating History’s Straits Barry Gough. Juan de Fuca’s Strait: Voyages in the Waterway of Forgotten Dreams. Madeira Park, BC: Harbour Publishing Co. Ltd., www.harbourpublishing.com, 2012. 288 pp., illustrations, maps, glossary, bibliography, notes, index. CDN/US $32.95, hardback; ISBN 978-1-55017-573-8. Much history has passed through the world’s straits: the Bosporus, Gibraltar, Molucca, Hormuz, Magellan, and here, Juan de Fuca’s strait, the Estrecho de Juan de Fuca. Straits are like the architect’s negative space, a portal through which significances pass, coloured by the land masses on their banks, and like negative space, the water can be more important than the nearby land. Such is the 13-mile-wide Strait of Juan de Fuca, located at 48° 23’ N to 48°36’ N, 124° 45’ W, portal to the Pacific and the Georgia Strait and Puget Sound. A pinnacle, de Fuca’s Pillar, off Cape Flattery marks the westerly entrance to the south, and to the north, the strait is bounded by Vancouver Island. Professor Barry Gough first wrote about the area in The Royal Navy in the Pacific Northwest, 1810-1914 in 1971, and now over forty years and many books later, he returns to the subject in Juan de Fuca’s Strait: Voyage in the Waterway of Forgotten Dreams. Strait is vintage Gough. Thoroughly ballasted in fact, it reads like a breeze. Before taking on Gough’s book, consider how it fits within the current art of writing history. A recent writer, Adam Gopnik, has observed that historians first treat races (dominant and subservient), then faces (the great and small), then places (wonders and the misbegotten).
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-44568-9 — Active Faults of the World Robert Yeats Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-44568-9 — Active Faults of the World Robert Yeats Index More Information Index Abancay Deflection, 201, 204–206, 223 Allmendinger, R. W., 206 Abant, Turkey, earthquake of 1957 Ms 7.0, 286 allochthonous terranes, 26 Abdrakhmatov, K. Y., 381, 383 Alpine fault, New Zealand, 482, 486, 489–490, 493 Abercrombie, R. E., 461, 464 Alps, 245, 249 Abers, G. A., 475–477 Alquist-Priolo Act, California, 75 Abidin, H. Z., 464 Altay Range, 384–387 Abiz, Iran, fault, 318 Alteriis, G., 251 Acambay graben, Mexico, 182 Altiplano Plateau, 190, 191, 200, 204, 205, 222 Acambay, Mexico, earthquake of 1912 Ms 6.7, 181 Altunel, E., 305, 322 Accra, Ghana, earthquake of 1939 M 6.4, 235 Altyn Tagh fault, 336, 355, 358, 360, 362, 364–366, accreted terrane, 3 378 Acocella, V., 234 Alvarado, P., 210, 214 active fault front, 408 Álvarez-Marrón, J. M., 219 Adamek, S., 170 Amaziahu, Dead Sea, fault, 297 Adams, J., 52, 66, 71–73, 87, 494 Ambraseys, N. N., 226, 229–231, 234, 259, 264, 275, Adria, 249, 250 277, 286, 288–290, 292, 296, 300, 301, 311, 321, Afar Triangle and triple junction, 226, 227, 231–233, 328, 334, 339, 341, 352, 353 237 Ammon, C. J., 464 Afghan (Helmand) block, 318 Amuri, New Zealand, earthquake of 1888 Mw 7–7.3, 486 Agadir, Morocco, earthquake of 1960 Ms 5.9, 243 Amurian Plate, 389, 399 Age of Enlightenment, 239 Anatolia Plate, 263, 268, 292, 293 Agua Blanca fault, Baja California, 107 Ancash, Peru, earthquake of 1946 M 6.3 to 6.9, 201 Aguilera, J., vii, 79, 138, 189 Ancón fault, Venezuela, 166 Airy, G.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Shaking
    ISSUE 03 - February 2016 WHAT’S SHAKING newsletter of the THE NEVADA SEISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY Earthquake Update NEVADA Carson RENO City Maps of earthquakes located by the Nevada Seismo- logical Laboratory (NSL) between 1/1/16 and 1/31/16, within the NSL network (right). Truckee Meadows region (above), Hawthorne, Nevada area (bottom left) and the area surrounding Las Vegas, Nevada (bottom right). HAWTHORNE Earthquakes located by the NSL (1/1/16-1/31/16) ML Quantity 4.0+ 1 3.0-3.9 2 2.0-2.9 67 Nevada 1.0-1.9 478 National ML < 1.0 809 Security Site Total 1357 eismicity during January included a small sequence near Haw- Sthorne, Nevada (above), and a notable sequence near Enter- LAS VEGAS prise, Utah (right). The largest of these Hawthorne events measured M3.2, and several events greater than M2.0 were also recorded. An event (M4.3) that occurred near Enterprise, Utah shook several eastern Nevada communities on January 15, 2016. The Sheldon Sequence also continues to be active in northwestern Nevada. Maps compiled by D. Molisee (2016) www.graphicdiffer.comwww.seismo.unr.edu @NVSeismoLab1 DEVELOPMENTS NSL Graduate Students Leverage Funding from the National Science Foundation unding for Steve Angster and will focus on the Agai-Pai, Indian FIan Pierce has come from Head, Gumdrop, Benton Springs, a National Science Foundation and Petrified fault systems, while grant (Steve Wesnousky, lead PI) Ian will study the Tahoe, Carson, focused on the deformation pat- Antelope Valley, Smith Valley, Ma- tern and kinematics of the Walker son Valley, and Walker Lake fault Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • "Juan De Fuca Plate Comparison Task JFP-2." W/Five Oversize
    - - .=~~ 1 5 ' ' w &.,3ciQ.sr~sv g %yvsi.,i;js; - '''W"''*1"% - oe' % . q. ip%*'" ,,, y u p <.o.mfAr+em % &- " ' , 'M'_4.m%9"Q@49 ytw . We- w.e.Ws re me weg4 p w : 1msew . >- . ,. ' == r o9. I sa , . M J. l.a8% ". , , - "_, i PG ,e s , p *s - - - 'M , ggg i an,a y? 2 - - .. | .g . , - m - . ' p - ,3 t j Wl - met * M ., , g.. y yM~~ US "4 r ~ wen -- wv ___ . $ t ==t. .t . g ,. - r,A. ~ [ . ~ - ,,1 . s. '' iws's . : - ;y w , h. 4.YJ,%#d8.N s " *,a ,h m.3.A. .t.***M j't., ?*W ythw,e ,f%.e.vr w . u, . # r-t"- tt,= t.;. gpf.fy; ,, Wig w.ca p,w uv s 4Wr;/ o; .n,,.s y,g . g p- ,y%'?;f. ,.,@n.~ ..th ,:M'..4,f@ga/ . h,. fx *.xitu. n.sp,,.9.p*%.eny;47.w e.;-:v.,g it..sge u M e.Q.mby b. j.R.*6 mc. n .p..&.. m. .e. 2. .. -v e : .m..,w;,;<,. ,. oc - a.m.g. p .,e as.m m.m> t n..45 v,s - .:a 3,;;,e,.,..a<. f ' c:;;,,: : . .~.:.s en me t .wt . * m, ,.e.. w.sd. m a.- ~. w .4 ::. .. .....~ . .-g m w.e. , ~T g M de p. w. * - N c .. h r. -> :vM.e,va .-ru .. -wi -M. e,,..w.4 w - n. -t . irow o m e a.v u A .,g,,..,- v.ws ;a;s ,, s w..;,u g , - * i. f. ;i > . %.7, s .e.,p, p.-;i..g- w., n>J, , r .- .-, a, C .- :ett.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologists Suggest Horseshoe Abyssal Plain May Be Start of a Subduction Zone 8 May 2019, by Bob Yirka
    Geologists suggest Horseshoe Abyssal Plain may be start of a subduction zone 8 May 2019, by Bob Yirka against one another. Over by the Iberian Peninsula, the opposite appears to be happening—the African and Eurasian plates are pulling apart as the former creeps east toward the Americas. Duarte noted that back in 2012, other researchers conducting seismic wave tests found what appeared to be a dense mass of unknown material beneath the epicenter of the 1969 quake. Some in the field suggested it could be the start of a subduction zone. Then, last year, another team conducted high-resolution imaging of the area and also found evidence of the mass, confirming that it truly existed. Other research has shown that the area just above the mass experiences routine tiny earthquakes. Duarte suggests the evidence to date indicates that the bottom of the plate is peeling away. This could happen, he explained, due to serpentinization in which water percolates through plate fractures and reacts with material beneath the surface, resulting A composite image of the Western hemisphere of the in the formation of soft green minerals. The soft Earth. Credit: NASA mineral layer, he suggests, is peeling away. And if that is the case, then it is likely the area is in the process of creating a subduction zone. He reports that he and his team members built models of their A team of geologists led by João Duarte gave a ideas and that they confirmed what he suspected. presentation at this past month's European The earthquakes were the result of the process of Geosciences Union meeting that included a birthing a new subduction zone.
    [Show full text]
  • An Independent Newspaper for the Pacific Northwest AUGUST 1997 VOL
    An Independent Newspaper for the Pacific Northwest AUGUST 1997 VOL. 3 No. 3 Dear Reader early all the problems we face in Cascadia boil down to population. NAs Alan Durning and Christopher Crowther point out in their new book, Misplaced Blame: The Real Roots of Population Growth, the Pacific Northwest is growing nearly twice the North American rate and almost 50 percent faster than the global population. The Northwest population reached 15 million EDITORIAL in mid-1997 and is swelling by another 1 million every 40 months. Starting this month, with our cover story on growth pressures in the scenic Columbia River Gorge, Cascadia Times Boom Times The UnbearableRightness ot Breen will publish an occasional series on, Can the Columbia River Gorge survive the Life on the fault line of environmentally growth, growth management strategies demand for development? and what it all means. As senior editor correct energy Kathie Durbin reports from the Columbia by Kathie Durbin Page 9 Gorge, local politics threaten this national by Kevin Bell Page 7 treasure. This is true everywhere, because growth and land-use decisions are in varyingdegrees made at the local THE USUAL STUFF level. We aren't saying that local commu• FIELD NOTES: Green groups clash over Sierra REALITY CHECK: 16 nities cannot do a good job protecting places such as the Gorge, Snoqualmie logging. EPA fines big Alaska mine. toxic waste POINT OF VIEW: The ASARCO juggernaut and Pass, Whidbey Island, Lake Tahoe or the on crops. Oregon slams nuclear weapons plan 3 Muir Woods, to name just a few places of its proposed Rock Creek Mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Specification for Construction of Truck Only and Vehicle Only Travelways in Missouri Phase 1
    Organizational Results Research Report September 2009 OR10.008 Engineering Specification for Construction of Truck Only and Vehicle Only Travelways in Missouri Phase 1 Prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates and Missouri Department of Transportation FINAL REPORT RI08-030 Engineering Specifications for Construction of Truck Only and Passenger Vehicle Only Travelways in Missouri Phase 1 Prepared for the Missouri Department of Transportation Organizational Results Division By: September 2009 The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this report are those of the principal investigator and the Missouri Department of Transportation. They are not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession 3. Recipient's Catalog No. OR10-008 No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Engineering Specifications for Construction of Truck Only and Passenger Vehicle Only Travelways in Missouri – Phase I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Wilbur Smith Associates RI08-030 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Wilbur Smith Associates 10401 Holmes Road, Suite 210 11. Contract or Grant No. Kansas City, MO 64131 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Missouri Department of Transportation Final Report Organizational Results 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P. O. Box 270-Jefferson City, MO 65102 MoDOT 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The objective of this study is to provide information detailing the safety consideration specifications for the truck only and passenger only facilities for I-70 and I-44.
    [Show full text]
  • Explorers Chapter 4
    Name _______________________ Date _________ Period _____ Explorers Chapter 4 Directions: Use your textbook, Washington, a State of Contrasts, to answer the questions for each section below. Eventually there may be an open-note test or quiz based on your answers to this packet. Remember to read with a purpose (keep words from the questions tucked away in your brain as you read), to skim and scan text features (titles, subtitles, pictures, captions, special features….) to guide your reading, and to re-read passages in order to increase your understanding. Chapter 4: Sea and Land Explorers: Pages 110-135 Chapter Overview: page 110 1.) According to the Chapter Overview on page 110, what countries were exploring the western coast of North America during the years 1543-1806? ______________________________ __________________________ ______________________________ __________________________ 2.) List 6 names of important explorers from this time era: ______________________________ __________________________ ______________________________ __________________________ ______________________________ __________________________ 3.) Why were these countries sending out so many explorers? Sea and Land Explorers: page 112 4.) On page 112, there is a picture of Christopher Columbus arriving in the “New World.” According to the text, why is it that there was “nothing new about these continents,”? 5.) ________________was the first country to actively claim territory in the Americas. 6.) What other countries soon began to claim territories in the Americas as well? 7.) Which areas were the last regions in the Americas to be explored by Europeans? Spanish in the New World: page 114 True/False: If the statement is true, write “T”. If it’s false at all, write “F”. _______ 8.) Spain was not looking for new lands to claim and colonize.
    [Show full text]
  • PETITION to PROTECT the HUMBOLDT MARTEN (Martes Caurina Humboldtensis) UNDER OREGON’S ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
    Attachment 2 PETITION TO PROTECT THE HUMBOLDT MARTEN (Martes caurina humboldtensis) UNDER OREGON’S ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Photo © Charlotte Eriksson Oregon State University June 26, 2018 PETITIONERS Cascadia Wildlands is a non‐profit, public interest environmental organization headquartered in Eugene, Oregon. Cascadia Wildlands educates, agitates, and inspires a movement to protect and restore Cascadia’s wild ecosystems, including the species therein. We envision vast old‐growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, and vibrant communities sustained by the unique landscapes of the Cascadia bioregion. We have worked for over a decade on Pacific marten issues in the Pacific Northwest. The Center for Biological Diversity is a non‐profit conservation organization with more than 1 million members and supporters dedicated to the conservation of endangered species and wild places, including members throughout the Pacific Northwest. The Center has been working to protect the Humboldt marten and its habitat for more than a decade. Defenders of Wildlife is a national non‐profit conservation organization founded in 1947 to protect all native animals and plants in their natural communities. Defenders works on mesocarnivore conservation and habitat connectivity in the range of the Humboldt marten through our field offices in Oregon and California. Environmental Protection Information Center is a community based, non‐profit organization that advocates for science‐based protection and restoration of Northwest California’s Forests. EPIC was founded in 1977 when local residents came together to successfully end aerial applications of herbicides by industrial logging companies in Humboldt County. Klamath‐Siskiyou Wildlands Center is a non‐profit, public interest organization that protects and restores wild nature in the Klamath‐Siskiyou region of northern California and southern Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • How Vulnerable Is the City of Port Angeles to Tsunamis?
    U NDERSTANDING T S U N A M I H AZARDS IN THE S T A T E O F W ASHINGTON How Vulnerable is the City of Port Angeles to Tsunamis? The Tsunami Hazard Port Angeles faces two types of tsunami hazard: Tsunamis from distant earthquakes on the Pacific rim, such as the 2011 magnitude 9.0 earthquake near Japan. This type is the most common. Because the waves arrive hours after the quake, they are less likely to cause loss of life, but may inflict damage. Local tsunamis caused by a M8.0 (or greater) earthquake on the Cascadia subduction zone. This type poses the greatest danger: catastrophic waves, much larger than those from a distant quake, will strike the coast within 25–30 minutes, causing loss of life and widespread damage to property. Much has been done to improve our understanding of Resources Natural of Department State Image: Washington tsunami hazards, develop warning systems, and Figure 1. Aerial view of the community of Port Angeles educate the public. If coastal communities are to and its harbor on Washington’s north coast. The tsunami reduce the impacts of future tsunamis, they need to hazard zone is shaded in yellow; highways are marked by know how tsunamis will affect their people, property, solid red lines. economy, and infrastructure. Port Angeles’ Vulnerability WHAT IS THE CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE? About 100 miles off Washington’s outer coast, the To support local tsunami planning efforts, the U.S. Juan de Fuca plate is being pushed beneath the Geological Survey and the Washington Military North American plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Rate Variations Prior to the 2010 Maule, Chile MW 8.8 Giant Megathrust Earthquake
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Seismic rate variations prior to the 2010 Maule, Chile MW 8.8 giant megathrust earthquake Benoit Derode1*, Raúl Madariaga1,2 & Jaime Campos1 The MW 8.8 Maule earthquake is the largest well-recorded megathrust earthquake reported in South America. It is known to have had very few foreshocks due to its locking degree, and a strong aftershock activity. We analyze seismic activity in the area of the 27 February 2010, MW 8.8 Maule earthquake at diferent time scales from 2000 to 2019. We diferentiate the seismicity located inside the coseismic rupture zone of the main shock from that located in the areas surrounding the rupture zone. Using an original spatial and temporal method of seismic comparison, we fnd that after a period of seismic activity, the rupture zone at the plate interface experienced a long-term seismic quiescence before the main shock. Furthermore, a few days before the main shock, a set of seismic bursts of foreshocks located within the highest coseismic displacement area is observed. We show that after the main shock, the seismic rate decelerates during a period of 3 years, until reaching its initial interseismic value. We conclude that this megathrust earthquake is the consequence of various preparation stages increasing the locking degree at the plate interface and following an irregular pattern of seismic activity at large and short time scales. Giant subduction earthquakes are the result of a long-term stress localization due to the relative movement of two adjacent plates. Before a large earthquake, the interface between plates is locked and concentrates the exter- nal forces, until the rock strength becomes insufcient, initiating the sudden rupture along the plate interface.
    [Show full text]