DOCSLIB.ORG

"Juan De Fuca Plate Comparison Task JFP-2." W/Five Oversize

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
- - .=~~ 1 5 ' ' w &.,3ciQ.sr~sv g %yvsi.,i;js; - '''W"''*1"% - oe' % . q. ip%*'" ,,, y u p <.o.mfAr+em % &- " ' , 'M'_4.m%9"Q@49 ytw . We- w.e.Ws re me weg4 p w : 1msew . >- . ,. ' == r o9. I sa , . M J. l.a8% ". , , - "_, i PG ,e s , p *s - - - 'M , ggg i an,a y? 2 - - .. | .g . , - m - . ' p - ,3 t j Wl - met * M ., , g.. y yM~~ US "4 r ~ wen -- wv ___ . $ t ==t. .t . g ,. - r,A. ~ [ . ~ - ,,1 . s. '' iws's . : - ;y w , h. 4.YJ,%#d8.N s " *,a ,h m.3.A. .t.***M j't., ?*W ythw,e ,f%.e.vr w . u, . # r-t"- tt,= t.;. gpf.fy; ,, Wig w.ca p,w uv s 4Wr;/ o; .n,,.s y,g . g p- ,y%'?;f. ,.,@n.~ ..th ,:M'..4,f@ga/ . h,. fx *.xitu. n.sp,,.9.p*%.eny;47.w e.;-:v.,g it..sge u M e.Q.mby b. j.R.*6 mc. n .p..&.. m. .e. 2. .. -v e : .m..,w;,;<,. ,. oc - a.m.g. p .,e as.m m.m> t n..45 v,s - .:a 3,;;,e,.,..a<. f ' c:;;,,: : . .~.:.s en me t .wt . * m, ,.e.. w.sd. m a.- ~. w .4 ::. .. .....~ . .-g m w.e. , ~T g M de p. w. * - N c .. h r. -> :vM.e,va .-ru .. -wi -M. e,,..w.4 w - n. -t . irow o m e a.v u A .,g,,..,- v.ws ;a;s ,, s w..;,u g , - * i. f. ;i > . %.7, s .e.,p, p.-;i..g- w., n>J, , r .- .-, a, C .- :ett. vim:*:y.s .a.c9:. ,m pg,;$,..t er,,. y v;*N,y'a * * 4P%a,=e.w.f,.g. , ,.,3 4.3 , -c. - a' : ,, ,,,. ,,. i We v t.W"' . .g,.,' m. ;. %|yo , .,.&s ....,.x. .. -. cj,g..y;. .. .y. -- ,3, . is . ' . -...g . e. ,;,W,. _ . ' .. ' . - m.. .,+,g, . rq *WP9P'M . r 3 M e ' : ' ' * t <*p, ,. :'"c'.7. W 9.. ?': ' .. - .'t?. m . .w - . r. .w . ~. g . .'.., , p . w .,. - 8 v, . , * - . * , * '. ; n ,. ., , , . ~ * * s -. , e te 'g ..*M . .,;,,m; . , . .a.a. ... g i. i * . ,(e-u 4 . / ..;;j p * . p i ( '+. .*, t - - * 5* y't {..t. ' *.,4*4'( g M.,. .* T. ;h i 'N ."'. ;. .; * g,,, ', y,,...j'';t* .e. " . ,; ' ," , *'.j7.;t 6 .? ms, .~ y ,M f.g** , ' . ,. ;. .g ' ..gg . : . - , / *(t',f M -N.; . e r: a. _ **{g . .. ,. , . ec. >. .s . r . 3.:.s,-g .|# i e., .. .;. v.v , ,,f**3*g *7'Vg *efy|V*t . .' ,,,,,.;. r;pf'<Tv h. vs ,. ,.*, .. .g . , . r * . - ., . j ,, , ,y,v, ;% 4 , ., . ,r.p,r y Q, &. f -y % +4*f/. vs.p::, * s.k f 2 F3 .,h/ eet. i-g /J.s,m). *f* M *f.f {. 7, f f4 ef ',',j &. m; y; .?; . t. , % -~sn;->r 9iw :nf. va 3sn ::.w m .. , .a y. =.w;ya.&.y< q, :...J r - + x.n.s :. ,. , ,w,a..g w *,1 Q. ft W . w. q . ,:;g -Qy,. s- 3s t ~ r4 aatw .pb * :rgw y y ansh-e.4 y3 W.,k:.:q;J%.u,, m6;.m. w.m. ,,,:, s .:; .e.q:g ;.pp%q.e r. y*T4 ; t .d. *"*, e- 'w vr o.b.< p f. ,ne. .a y - - ki.S bT w g. ''*~7 E $.*$-8 *d".*.T % JE 4 *&p".f.) i,y*,[. ; -* . ~.,.#e ,w.mJ c.g.y,.,;v[J:.dgl .,. ,fy' * .ap*J ky. Mc. , Oec<. T.1 ; A.. 7 ggy .;s.,. k ^ - * z ;f. - . ,,,,.g ; 'M M a, '" - * .',, ' Q.Q,.Qw.4,, e ,g ,,[ w'f,Apedq[.3g'gy.'. 5'* G'*~4 W r.a. , fh;- . d" v. .g % s.y. : -- n$;.4 $m . ...,4) ist*' 1". iM -7.pe,.' h'M,f f.N. # -^""*' ' " '''"** . '.; ' ' e'"#.5y"ag.g gy W. tG W 4 N'2,h.@.. ,dih. 7*Oh'g*8M.~ Q'M' G ' %g'% 18 4 4 n..'. .. - 8$.h...b..M~. E. f,#e..'. .'* N.f;b~b . @.;ft/1c*ay,tma.,bE,71AA;, f, g pr n. ' .? .O:* . N. N..Na- F.S* [[S**d". *{ ' 8<.e ['y/g i / 8', *,. y .4%.,r* *! # . ,, kk + *. ' 1 T 46=.v, , ~. 5 .h ^ u :.,... + .',9.- . Lv mm e $.;[' .; ,.* . , .rs;.. .:, b n n . m.u ,syvf,aa p. wg , * ... 2 . ; yj s > g; . y;-|f . ' ' . y* .. .'i ' - - ,} #e 3;, . .e. pa. .i q t .: ;;.,-,a 9 . ,,.;;.;,gg ..b;. ' J. ;m - ~ . ;a , ,c ' - *:. ,-|, r. : r. 4:u .q,j .. %.f.y - . , , , ,gy f+ e. Or , r. , ?'k; . ; .e. i '. - ;d%ykK. g*?c. x | :;.:::&.h.W2 . y8 * *e. .; c w . ;rc o..a.y,.y. ; v ..4 m* . .s.. s.J ,,1, f , , - 'c . , . .g y s. - ".T + * [ . ,* . m f. - . , p.-:. W .w .- . ~* 5*. : v . s. .v,:. w v m. ..n ;c y;.y,q,y.7.'r|;<i.ywg- : r.q::. ,.z.s- m". .; D; n. :.." <. ,y. v.,: ,A 4,o4 . ~c - . [email protected],:,.,v.e.>. .'!n.r.s$$$eN*dH Y@,&,gM@n . :. 9 .w'..the- b . #-?; : w s em . n o. w . 5 .f:x %.v - %n:4.%n,.:.w; , h. $.M.y,p,Ay,$m%,- y :.t W. ."3h.: , .N$M.M[9d? g.,gg gg , :., . :;n. .- , N % Adk gW.J A h t w u cv w - g g{; g v w, .4gpy .s. j , 5f / %g 8$. [ k , g M f . .,;. .- ** .s v $[ffh. h ** v5kee . Q.dWh*M.,,&n s' , %QW. c * "766Mn.<-gkg: m g.er3pg .. _ . _. 9% ' j * m .- y ,y g g .w cw?' " - pegg .g.?;N %g%f*dagPp7dMMitbM3 , _ s. q g w % -. .g gg j - w c kte y.vg WM( y S $,,("v?w - x. 4 F ,df-jQ p ; Mhn.W nJd h .at.gpa.tea m r.'e.:- $MM$7.d ML .m? e * 5,r G d.D'[email protected], :' " [. V N M@iG M[c u -x M m. D20N jM.Y.b,g.,[w%n.4hk.a$t .% m,,q.xtg ny[w}M$M.$.-tyu n.,.Wwn y w Wpapy;?%g?"hhS'5h .. h y ., N' , W aY p$ Y $ |$ $kk ? ( Ef.Y ' .,.h h? . u | n%, % f e.a w . m'.m .. 'h 4 g'A q"$ @'N ' 8408160413 840808 , "m$ " , a_$,@w?'W.5fj h , - 'Q ' PDR ADOCK 05000508 e - $ A PDR % * * gM ni R g; .,; . a;;,Mg. A.nw.4- . %,L .e Ru.#m #N+NE999.m. _ s W 3 gb @y@,4 . w 25 y g ~ - mn M @. ~ , +. ww.- e Ri 1 w w wnsultan w.muc 'ts gh'a.*G.<J5 Ee . b , .__ #b'Nb NYbN . Woodward Clyde Consultants 3 Juan de Fuca Plate Comparison Task JFP-2 Prepared for Washington Public Power Supply System Richland, Washington By Woodward-Clyde Consultants 100 Pringle Avenue Walnut Creek, CA 94596 February 1984 [hW \ .. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' . | N% Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS | Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 COMPARATIVE DATA BASE 2 w 3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS WORK 3 3.1 Qualitative Comparisons 3 3.2 Quantitative Comparisons 5 4.0 COMPARIS0N BETWEEN THE JUAN DE FUCA AND OTHER SUBDUCTION ZONES 5 4.1 - t egence Rate and Age of Subducting 6 U.shosphere at the Trench 4.2 Back-Arc Spreading 7 4.3 Depth of Seismicity 8 4.4 Trench Bathymetry 8 4.5 Dip of Benioff Zone 10 4.6 Seafloor Topography 10 4.7 Preseismic Quiescence 11 4.8 Focal Mechanisms in the Subducting Plate 13 d in the Vicinity of the Trench - 4.9 Focal Mechanisms in the Overriding Plate 14 _ 4.10 Focal Mechanisms in the Back-Arc Region 15 4.11 Transverse Structures / Segmentation 15 4.12 Heat Flow 17 5.0 SUMMARY 18 6.0 REFERENCES 20 | APPENDIX A - DESCRIPTION OF SUBDUCTION ZONE PARAMETERS - TABLES 1A AND 18 i -1- | l ) ! ._. .. -- I Woodward Clyde Consultants i ! ; LIST OF FIGURES 1 Subduction Zone Locations 2 Subduction. Zone Magnitude - Convergence Rate-Age Relationship LIST OF TABLES , 1A Seismicity Characteristics 1B Geologic / Geometric Characteristics 2A Seismicity Characteristics: References 28 Geologic / Geometric Characteristics: References . G G -11 - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ __ .. _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ , _ _ . _ . _ _ Woodward Clyde Consultants i JUAN DE FUCA PLATE COMPARISON TASK JFP-2 1.0 INTRODUCTION Presently available geologic, seismologic, and geodetic data permit a variety of interpretations regarding the nature of interaction along the shallow interface between the Juan de Fuca and North American plates. This results in a wide range of uncertainty in assessing the seismic potential of the int erface. As used in this report, seismic potential refers both to the ability of the interface to rupture and produce. large earthquakes and to the magnitude of these events. Interpretations of plate interaction and seismic potential include: present-day accumulation of strain on the plate interface using trilateration data (Savage and others,1981); a strongly coupled plate boundary with the potential for large thrust earthquakes based on comparison with other subduction zones (Heaton and Kanamori, in press); a locked plate interface interpreted from the orientation of P-axes along the Mt. St. Helens seismic zone (Weaver and Smith,1983); aseismic subduction based on leveling surveys and tide gauge measurements (Ando and Balazs,1979); and an unlacked subduction zone with aseismic subduction based on the lack of interplate earthquakes, the north-south orientation of P-axes of earthquake fault plane solutions, and amount of seismicity observed since 1900 (Rogers,1983). For most subduction zones the seismicity that has occurred during this century forms an adequate basis for evaluating the seismic potential of the zone (Ruff and Kanamori,1980).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Vulnerable Is the City of Port Angeles to Tsunamis?
    U NDERSTANDING T S U N A M I H AZARDS IN THE S T A T E O F W ASHINGTON How Vulnerable is the City of Port Angeles to Tsunamis? The Tsunami Hazard Port Angeles faces two types of tsunami hazard: Tsunamis from distant earthquakes on the Pacific rim, such as the 2011 magnitude 9.0 earthquake near Japan. This type is the most common. Because the waves arrive hours after the quake, they are less likely to cause loss of life, but may inflict damage. Local tsunamis caused by a M8.0 (or greater) earthquake on the Cascadia subduction zone. This type poses the greatest danger: catastrophic waves, much larger than those from a distant quake, will strike the coast within 25–30 minutes, causing loss of life and widespread damage to property. Much has been done to improve our understanding of Resources Natural of Department State Image: Washington tsunami hazards, develop warning systems, and Figure 1. Aerial view of the community of Port Angeles educate the public. If coastal communities are to and its harbor on Washington’s north coast. The tsunami reduce the impacts of future tsunamis, they need to hazard zone is shaded in yellow; highways are marked by know how tsunamis will affect their people, property, solid red lines. economy, and infrastructure. Port Angeles’ Vulnerability WHAT IS THE CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE? About 100 miles off Washington’s outer coast, the To support local tsunami planning efforts, the U.S. Juan de Fuca plate is being pushed beneath the Geological Survey and the Washington Military North American plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology 111 • Discovering Planet Earth • Steven Earle • 2010
    H1) Earthquakes The plates that make up the earth's lithosphere are constantly in motion. The rate of motion is a few centimetres per year, or approximately 0.1 mm per day (about as fast as your fingernails grow). This does not mean, however, that the rocks present at the places where plates meet (e.g., convergent boundaries and transform faults) are constantly sliding past each other. Under some circumstances they do, but in most cases, particularly in the upper part of the crust, the friction between rocks at a boundary is great enough so that the two plates are locked together. As the plates themselves continue to move, deformation takes place in the rocks close to the locked boundary and strain builds up in the deformed rocks. This strain, or elastic deformation, represents potential energy stored within the rocks in the vicinity of the boundary between two plates. Eventually the strain will become so great that the friction and rock-strength that is preventing movement between the plates will be overcome, the rocks will break and the plates will suddenly slide past each other - producing an earthquake [see Fig. 10.4]. A huge amount of energy will suddenly be released, and will radiate away from the location of the earthquake in the form of deformation waves within the surrounding rock. S-waves (shear waves), and P-waves (compression waves) are known as body waves as they travel through the rock. As soon as this happens, much of the strain that had built up along the fault zone will be released1.
    [Show full text]
  • OCEAN/ESS 410 1 Lab 3. the Juan De Fuca Plate Please Write out Your
    OCEAN/ESS 410 Lab 3. The Juan de Fuca Plate Please write out your answers on a separate sheet of paper. In this exercise you are going to be looking at the bathymetry of the Juan de Fuca plate region, identifying interesting features and their characteristics, and attempting to interpret what you see. Some of the questions may be difficult for you to answer now (although hopefully not at the end of the Quarter) – part of the objective is to get you to look carefully at the maps and think rather that immediately writing down an answer. The Instructor and TAs will be coming around the lab answering questions. Figure 1 shows the plate boundaries for the Juan de Fuca plate region and you will use this as your road map as you explore the Juan de Fuca plate with the program GeoMapApp, a versatile program that is used by researchers to look at bathymetry and other seafloor data. To run GeoMapApp do the following 1. Start GeoMapApp on the lab computer from the Start menu or from the Desktop Icon if you have one. If it asks you to install a new version you do not have to. 2. Select the default Mercator Base Map (left hand map) 3. Learn to use the “Zoom In”, “Zoom Out” and “Pan the Map” tools. You can use the “Zoom In” tool either by clicking on the map or holding the mouse button down to rubber-band a box of interest. The Overlays menu allows you to add a Distance Scale and Color Bar.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Movements of the Juan De Fuca Plate System
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 89, NO. B8, PAGES 6980-6994, AUGUST 10, 1984 Recent Movements of the Juan de Fuca Plate System ROBIN RIDDIHOUGH! Earth PhysicsBranch, Pacific GeoscienceCentre, Departmentof Energy, Mines and Resources Sidney,British Columbia Analysis of the magnetic anomalies of the Juan de Fuca plate system allows instantaneouspoles of rotation relative to the Pacific plate to be calculatedfrom 7 Ma to the present.By combiningthese with global solutions for Pacific/America and "absolute" (relative to hot spot) motions, a plate motion sequencecan be constructed.This sequenceshows that both absolute motions and motions relative to America are characterizedby slower velocitieswhere younger and more buoyant material enters the convergencezone: "pivoting subduction."The resistanceprovided by the youngestportion of the Juan de Fuca plate apparently resulted in its detachmentat 4 Ma as the independentExplorer plate. In relation to the hot spot framework, this plate almost immediately began to rotate clockwisearound a pole close to itself such that its translational movement into the mantle virtually ceased.After 4 Ma the remainder of the Juan de Fuca plate adjusted its motion in responseto the fact that the youngest material entering the subductionzone was now to the south. Differencesin seismicityand recent uplift betweennorthern and southernVancouver Island may reflect a distinction in tectonicstyle betweenthe "normal" subductionof the Juan de Fuca plate to the south and a complex "underplating"occurring as the Explorer plate is overriddenby the continent.The history of the Explorer plate may exemplifythe conditionsunder which the self-drivingforces of small subductingplates are overcomeby the influenceof larger, adjacent plates. The recent rapid migration of the absolutepole of rotation of the Juan de Fuca plate toward the plate suggeststhat it, too, may be nearingthis condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Reflection Imaging of the Subducting Juan De Fuca Plate
    __ ____ _ _N_ A_TU�R_E_v_o_L_ . _31_9_1_6_JAN_uA_R_Y 1 9_86 =-=21:.:.o __________ __ _____ LETIERSTQNATLJRE _ __ _ _ Seismic reflection imaging of that is underplated. These findingslead us to speculate that success­ ive underplating of oceanic lithosphere may be an important pro­ the subducting Juan de Fuca plate cess in the evolution and growth of continents. A total of 205 km of deep seismic reflection data have been A. R. M. J. G. Green*, Clowest, C. YoratM, collected along the fourprofiles shown in the simplified geologi­ C. Spencer*, E. R. Kanasewich§, M. T. Brandon:j: cal map of southeastern Vancouver Island (Fig. 1). The VISPl & A. Sutherland Brown:j: line crosses the width of the island and is almost coincident with one of the gravity profiles studied by Riddihough 10 and * Division of Seismology and Geomagnetism, Department of Energy, with the combined onshore/ offshore seismic refraction line of Mines and Resources, I Observatory Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, Spence et al.17• Some three-dimensional control on the interpre­ Canada KIA OY3 tation of VISPl is available from the VISP3 line located 15- t Department of Geophysics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T IWS 20 km to the east and from a short test line described by Clowes 18 :j: Pacific Geoscience Centre, Department of Energy, Mines and et al. • The two southeasterly lines, VISP2 and VISP4, were Resources, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2 designed to determine the attitudes and significance of the San § Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Juan, Survey Mountain and Leech River faults.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Structure of the Endeavour Segment, Juan De Fuca Ridge: Correlations with Seismicity and Hydrothermal Activity E
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112, B02401, doi:10.1029/2005JB004210, 2007 Click Here for Full Article Seismic structure of the Endeavour Segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge: Correlations with seismicity and hydrothermal activity E. M. Van Ark,1 R. S. Detrick,2 J. P. Canales,2 S. M. Carbotte,3 A. J. Harding,4 G. M. Kent,4 M. R. Nedimovic,3 W. S. D. Wilcock,5 J. B. Diebold,3 and J. M. Babcock4 Received 9 December 2005; revised 23 June 2006; accepted 21 September 2006; published 3 February 2007. [1] Multichannel seismic reflection data collected in July 2002 at the Endeavour Segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge, show a midcrustal reflector underlying all of the known high-temperature hydrothermal vent fields in this area. On the basis of the character and geometry of this reflection, its similarity to events at other spreading centers, and its polarity, we identify this as a reflection from one or more crustal magma bodies rather than from a hydrothermal cracking front interface. The Endeavour magma chamber reflector is found under the central, topographically shallow section of the segment at two-way traveltime (TWTT) values of 0.9–1.4 s (2.1–3.3 km) below the seafloor. It extends approximately 24 km along axis and is shallowest beneath the center of the segment and deepens toward the segment ends. On cross-axis lines the axial magma chamber (AMC) reflector is only 0.4–1.2 km wide and appears to dip 8–36° to the east. While a magma chamber underlies all known Endeavour high-temperature hydrothermal vent fields, AMC depth is not a dominant factor in determining vent fluid properties.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Dynamics of the Juan De Fuca Plate
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 189 (2001) 115^131 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl On the dynamics of the Juan de Fuca plate Rob Govers *, Paul Th. Meijer Faculty of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.021, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands Received 11 October 2000; received in revised form 17 April 2001; accepted 27 April 2001 Abstract The Juan de Fuca plate is currently fragmenting along the Nootka fault zone in the north, while the Gorda region in the south shows no evidence of fragmentation. This difference is surprising, as both the northern and southern regions are young relative to the central Juan de Fuca plate. We develop stress models for the Juan de Fuca plate to understand this pattern of breakup. Another objective of our study follows from our hypothesis that small plates are partially driven by larger neighbor plates. The transform push force has been proposed to be such a dynamic interaction between the small Juan de Fuca plate and the Pacific plate. We aim to establish the relative importance of transform push for Juan de Fuca dynamics. Balancing torques from plate tectonic forces like slab pull, ridge push and various resistive forces, we first derive two groups of force models: models which require transform push across the Mendocino Transform fault and models which do not. Intraplate stress orientations computed on the basis of the force models are all close to identical. Orientations of predicted stresses are in agreement with observations. Stress magnitudes are sensitive to the force model we use, but as we have no stress magnitude observations we have no means of discriminating between force models.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation 2: How Do We Recognize Plate Boundaries? Assessment
    Investigation 2: How do we recognize plate boundaries? Assessment Answer the questions below in complete sentences. 1. What major plate lies west of the North American plate? The major plate west of the North American plate is the Pacific plate. 2. What plate lies northeast of the North American plate? The plate NE of the North American plate is the Eurasian plate. 3. What plate borders the North American plate to the southeast? The plate that borders the North American plate to the southeast is the African plate. 4. Which three plates border the North American plate to the south? The Caribbean, Cocos, and South American plates border the North American plate to the south. 5. What plate borders the North American plate in the U.S. Pacific Northwest? The plate that borders the North American plate in the U.S. Pacific Northwest is the Juan de Fuca Plate. 6. How are earthquakes and volcanoes related to plate boundaries? Earthquake clusters occur on or very near plate boundaries. Volcanoes occur about 100 kilometers away from a plate boundary in the overriding plate. 7. What kind of plate boundary separates the North American and Eurasian plates? A divergent plate boundary separates the North American and Eurasian plates. Copyright © 2012 Environmental Literacy and Inquiry Working Group at Lehigh University Investigation 2: Assessment 2 8. What kind of plate boundary separates the North American and Pacific plates at 31˚ latitude, -115˚ longitude? A transform plate boundary separates the North American and Pacific plates at 31˚ latitude, -115˚ longitude. 9. What kind of plate boundary separates the North American and Pacific plates at 55˚ latitude, -160˚ longitude? A convergent plate boundary separates the North American and Pacific plates at 55˚ latitude, -160˚ longitude.
    [Show full text]
  • LIVING on SHAKY GROUND What Do I Do?
    HOW TO SURVIVE EARTHQUAKES AND TSUNAMIS IN OREGON DAMAGE IN DOWNTOWN KLAMATH FALLS FROM A MAGNITUDE 6.0 EARTHQUAKE IN1993 TSUNAMI DAMAGE IN SEASIDE FROM THE 1964 GREAT ALASKAN EARTHQUAKE 1 Oregon Emergency Management Copyright 2009, Humboldt Earthquake Education Center at Humboldt State University. Adapted and reproduced with permission by Oregon Emergency You Can Prepare for the Management with help from the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. Reproduction by permission only. Next Quake or Tsunami Disclaimer This document is intended to promote earthquake and tsunami readiness. It is based on the best SOME PEOPLE THINK it is not worth preparing for an earthquake or a tsunami currently available scientific, engineering, and sociological because whether you survive or not is up to chance. NOT SO! Most Oregon research. Following its suggestions, however, does not guarantee the safety of an individual or of a structure. buildings will survive even a large earthquake, and so will you, especially if you follow the simple guidelines in this handbook and start preparing today. Prepared by the Humboldt Earthquake Education Center and the Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group (RCTWG), If you know how to recognize the warning signs of a tsunami and understand in cooperation with the California Earthquake Authority what to do, you will survive that too—but you need to know what to do ahead (CEA), California Emergency Management Agency (Cal of time! EMA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), California Geological Survey (CGS), Department of This handbook will help you prepare for earthquakes and tsunamis in Oregon. Interior United States Geological Survey (USGS), the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration It explains how you can prepare for, survive, and recover from them.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Survive Earthquakes and Tsunamis in Oregon
    Living on Shaky Ground How to survive earthquakes and tsunamis in Oregon Copyright 2018, Oregon Office of Emergency Management with help from the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. Originally adapted from Humboldt Earthquake Education Center at Humboldt State University. Reproduction by permission only. Disclaimer: This document is intended to promote earthquake and tsunami readiness. It is based on the best currently available scientific, engineering, and sociological research. Following its suggestions, however, does not guarantee the safety of an individual or of a structure. Contributors • Michael Murphy, Coos County • Patence Winningham, City of Eugene • Justin Ross, Multnomah County • Cynthia Valdivia, Washington County • Bonny Cushman, City of Portland • Barbara Ayers, Hood River County • Curtis Peetz, American Red Cross • John Bowles, Morrow County • Virginia Demaris, Lincoln County • Terri Eubanks, City of Ashland • Althea Rizzo, Oregon Office of Emergency Management • Paula Negele, Oregon Office of Emergency Management ii Oregon Office of Emergency Management Introduction You can prepare for the What do I do? next quake or tsunami an earthquake you should: During Some people think it is not worth preparing for • If you are indoors, DROP and take COVER an earthquake or a tsunami because whether you under a sturdy table or other furniture. HOLD survive or not is up to chance. NOT SO! ON to it and stay put until the shaking stops. Most Oregon buildings will survive even a large • Stay clear of items that can fall and injure you, earthquake, and so will you, especially if you such as windows, fireplaces and heavy furniture. follow the simple guidelines in this handbook • Stay inside.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Ocean Tsunami Generated by Alaska Earthquake
    Pacific Ocean Tsunami Generated by Alaska Earthquake About four hours travel time to Oregon Coast. Tsunami from 1964 Alaska EQ killed 4 children on Beverly Beach. The largest of 28 distant tsunamis to affect Oregon coast since 1854. Significant damage in Seaside and Cannon Beach. Major destruction and 13 deaths in Crescent City, CA. Damage in Cannon Beach from 1964 Alaska Tsunami Bridge over Elk Creek (now Ecola Creek) destroyed and displaced 300 m upstream. House torn from foundation and displaced 400 m upstream. From Priest and others, DOGAMI Special Paper 41, 2009. Distant Tsunami Inundation Map for Bandon, Oregon Tsunami Evacuation Map for Bandon, Oregon Distant tsunami evacuation zone determined from maximum Alaska tsunami. Local Tsunami Evacuation Zone determined from maximum Cascadia tsunami. Past Great Cascadia Earthquakes and Tsunamis Juan de FFuca subductsbd bbeneathh PPacificifiN Northwesth portion of North American Plate at Cascadia subduction zone. Last great Cascadia earthquake occurred on January 26, 1700 at about 9:00 PM local time. Analogous to Sumatra 2004, Chile 2010, and Tohoku, Japan 2011 great earthquakes. Native American Stories Earthquakes and Tsunamis Oral histories tell of a great wave that arrived in the night and put the canoes in the trees … Some Coast Areas Now Below Sea Level Yuriage Before After • Some areas that were above sea level on march 10 dropped below sea level on March 11, 2011. • This also happened along the Washington - Oregon coast during the 1700 AD great Cascadia earthquake. Drowned Forests of Coastal Oregon and Washington Ghost forest on Copalis River Brian Atwater, USGS Seattle Coastal “drowned forests” record the history of slow uplift between and sudden subsidence during great Cascadia earthquakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsunami Hazard to North and West Vancouver, British Columbia
    NSEMO tsunami report Tsunami Hazard to North and West Vancouver, British Columbia Prepared by: Dr. John J. Clague PGeo Dr. John Orwin Centre for Natural Hazard Research Simon Fraser University Presented to: North Shore Emergency Planning Office Date: December 5, 2005 i NSEMO tsunami report Table of Contents List of tables ……………………………………………………………………….. iii List of figures ……………………………………………………………………… iii Summary ………………………………………………………………………….. iv 1 Scope of report …………………………………………………………………. 1 2 Anatomy of a tsunami ………………………………………………………… 1 3 Past tsunamis in British Columbia …………………………………………. 2 3.1 1964 Alaska tsunami ………………………………………………………. 2 3.2 1700 Cascadia tsunami ……………………………………………………. 3 4 Potential sources of tsunamis that might affect the North Shore ……. 3 4.1 Subduction zone earthquakes ……………………………………………. 3 4.1.1 Earthquakes at the Cascadia subduction zone ………………………….. 4 4.1.2 Earthquakes at other Pacific subduction zones ………………………….. 5 4.2 Shallow local earthquakes ………………………………………………… 5 4.3 Landslides at the front of the Fraser delta ………………………………. 5 4.4 Landslides in Howe Sound or Indian Arm ……………………………….. 6 5 Documenting past tsunamis from the geologic record …………………. 6 5.1 2005 field work ………………………………………………………………. 7 6 Tsunami inundation risk maps ……………………………………………….. 7 6.1 North Vancouver …………………………………………………………….. 7 6.2 West Vancouver ……………………………………………………………… 8 7 North Shore tsunami risk ……………………………………………………… 8 8 Preparedness, mitigation, and response strategies ……………………… 9 8.1 Preparedness ………………………………………………………………… 9 8.2 Mitigation
    [Show full text]