DOCSLIB.ORG

Goulandris, Atalanta Redacted.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Goulandris, Atalanta Redacted.Pdf City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Goulandris, A. (2016). Continuity and change: the professional lives and culture of self-employed barristers in England and Wales. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City, University of London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17678/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Continuity and Change: the professional lives and culture of self-employed barristers in England and Wales Atalanta Goulandris City, University of London Department of Sociology A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 2–5 Acknowledgements 6 Declaration and Note 7 Abstract 8 Key to Abbreviations 9 Introduction 10 PART I Chapter 1 – Research Context – Reforming the Bar 15-34 Origins and development of the profession 1.1 Emergence of the Bar 15 1.2 The Inns of Court: Influence, education and training 17 1.3 Status and Distinction 19 1.4 Lawyer Monopolies and jurisdictional disputes 20 1.5 Representation and Regulation 22 1.6 Legal Aid and the growth of the profession 23 Reforming the Bar 1.7 Early critiques 23 1.8 Loss of monopolies and internal reforms 25 1.9 The Green Papers 1989 and the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 26 1.10 Solicitor Advocates 28 1.11 Legal Aid 28 1.11.1 Civil Legal Aid 29 1.11.2 Further Cuts: Transforming Legal Aid 30 1.12 Liberalisation of the legal services market, independent regulation and The Legal Services Act 2007 31 Chapter 2 – Researching the Bar: themes and perspectives 35-47 2.1 Theorising the Bar: Richard Abel 36 2.2 Empirical research on the Bar 39 2.2.1 Early critical studies 39 2.2.2 A different ‘in the field’ approach 40 2.2.3 Morison and Leith (1992) – on the cusp of change 42 2.2.4 Specific studies 43 2 2.2.5 Legacy of previous empirical research 46 2.2.6 Internal Perspectives 46 2.3 Theoretical perspectives from the sociology of the professions 48 2.3.1 Overview 48 2.3.2 Professional development – jurisdictional disputes triggering change 51 2.3.3 Professionalism reshaped 52 Chapter 3 – Methodology 58-78 3.1 Overview 59 3.2 Research Design 61 3.3 My Sample 64 3.4 Observation 66 3.5 Accessing elites 69 3.6 Ethical Issues 73 3.6.1 Clerks and Chambers Staff 73 3.6.2 A period of ‘crisis’ in the profession 74 3.7 Data Analysis 75 PART II – Findings, Discussion and Conclusions 79 Chapter 4 – Chambers 80-102 4.1 Old chambers model 81 4.2 The growth of chambers and rise of specialist teams 84 4.3 Location, front stage, backstage and virtual space 87 4.4 The new commercialism – business and management 90 4.5 The new clerk 93 4.6 Chambers’ branding 97 4.7 ABS and going ‘global’ 98 4.6 Discussion 100 Chapter 5 – Getting in, fitting in and playing by the new rules 103-135 5.1 Pupillage: how it evolved and what it entails 105 5.2 Regulation of the pupillage selection process 106 5.3 Recent reviews of pupillage and entry to the Bar 107 5.4 Costs and ‘massification’ of legal education 108 5.5 The ‘special’ CV 111 5.5.1 Mini pupillages 113 3 5.5.2 Further educational qualifications 115 5.5.3 Other work experience 116 5.5.4 The implications of these new trends 117 5.6 Pupillage selection processes 118 5.6.1 The sifting stage 119 5.6.2 The interview stage 123 5.7 Pupillage 125 5.7.1 Structure and supervision 125 5.7.2 Training courses during pupillage 130 5.7.3 The pupillage experience 132 Chapter 6 – Getting work 136-164 6.1 The new entrepreneurial barrister 137 6.2 Online branding, high visibility and social media 140 6.3 Marketing in groups/teams 143 6.4 Individual initiatives: specialism, new practice areas and diversification 145 6.5 Relationship Building 148 6.6 Attitudes to marketing 150 6.7 Direct Access 153 6.7.1 Advantages 154 6.7.2 Unsuitability 155 6.7.3 Client contact 158 6.7.4 Solicitors and Direct Access 161 6.7.5 Public awareness of direct access 162 6.8 Discussion 163 Chapter 7 – Bar Culture 165-190 7.1 Independence, autonomy and public service 167 7.2 Accountability, regulation and managerial reforms 174 7.3 CFAs and their impact on independence 179 7.4 Excellence, commitment and trust 182 7.5 Discussion 188 Chapter 8 – Community, identity and professional socialisation 191-213 8.1 Inns of Court 191 8.2 Specialist Bar Associations 195 4 8.3 Chambers 197 8.4 A United Bar? 200 8.4.1 The ‘public/private’ divide 201 8.4.2 Changing chambers 204 8.5 Inclusion/exclusion and diversity 206 8.6 Giving back to the community: charity and pro bono 210 8.7 Discussion 211 Chapter 9 – Conclusions – a new Bar? 214-225 APPENDICES 226-236 Appendix 1 List of Participants 226 Appendix 2 Seminars/conferences attended 228 Appendix 3 Southampton University Ethics approval 229 Appendix 4 Samples of interview questions 230 Appendix 5 Participant Information Sheet 233 Appendix 6 Consent Form 235 Appendix 7 City University, London consent form October 2013 236 Bibliography 237-253 5 Acknowledgements My first thanks must go to all the barristers, chambers staff and other participants, without whom the study would not have been possible. They were generous with their time and knowledge and many shared some of the difficulties they are facing in their professional lives during a time of great change at the Bar. Particular thanks to the barrister (and his family) who housed me for a week and whom I shadowed throughout his working days in that period. Enormous thanks to barristers Sinclair Cramsie and Francis Fitzgibbon QC for reading an earlier draft - feedback from practitioners was hugely valuable and very much appreciated. I could have not have wished for a wiser, more attentive, hard-working and inspiring supervisor than Professor Eugene McLaughlin. I thank him deeply for his advice, guidance, continuous reading and feedback. Professor Andy Boon was a very valuable second supervisor and I am grateful to him for directing me to some of the relevant literature, his feedback on many of the drafts and for permitting me to air and share some of my preliminary findings at two consecutive annual Socio Legal Studies Association conferences. My fellow PhD students in the department have made the doctoral experience much more fun than it might have been and I thank the Soc Anon crowd in particular for their support and friendship. Thanks also to Lisa Migo and Blessing Theophilus Israel, administrators of the Sociology doctoral programme at City. Last, but not certainly not least, I thank my family: Stephane, for his support, despite being ignored quite a lot of the time, for proofreading and for always showing interest; our children, who grew up during the years it took to complete this study and maintained a sustained and impressive indifference to it throughout, obliging me to remain firmly rooted in ‘real’ life. 6 Declaration I grant powers of discretion to the University Librarian to allow the thesis to be copied in whole or in part without further reference to me. This permission covers only single copies made for study purposes, subject to normal conditions of acknowledgement. Note An earlier version of Chapters 5 and 7 appeared in: Goulandris, A. (2015) ‘Reshaping professionalism: branding, marketing and the new entrepreneurial barrister’, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 22(3): 272-298 7 ABSTRACT This thesis explores how self-employed barristers responded to the reforms that have reshaped the profession in the last 25 years, to assess if and how their professional lives and perceptions of Bar identity and culture have changed as a result. The loss of its advocacy monopoly, cuts to legal aid, the liberalisation of the rules governing the Bar’s working structures and external regulation go to the core of the reforms. It is a qualitative study, based on semi-structured interviews with barristers and chambers staff, together with observation in chambers, at court and at informal and formal Bar events over a period of 18 months, triangulated by in-depth reading of the trade press, the national media, social media and official pronouncements from the profession’s representative and regulatory bodies for the same period. The study takes into account the literature on the sociology of the professions and tests its applicability to the Bar’s distinct and idiosyncratic structures and ways of working. It considers Abbott’s (1988) professional development thesis, which focuses on jurisdictional battles between professions for control over tasks and the attendant changes that emerge as a result of such conflicts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Legal Services Act 2007: an Act of Revolution for the Legal Profession? 1
    May 2011 THE LEGAL SERVICES ACT 2007: AN ACT OF REVOLUTION FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION? 1 Michael Zander QC FBA Emeritus Professor, London School of Economics Introduction From the 1960s, for forty or so years, I took a close interest in the affairs of the legal profession but it is now quite a number of years since I have published anything on the subject. I was therefore very pleased to be invited to give a lecture on this topic as it gave me the stimulus to try to get to grips with what has been happening as a result of the passing of the Legal Services Act. Since most of you are lawyers who have no doubt been reading about the Act and its implications for several years, it would obviously be inappropriate to go through it as if this was new legislation requiring explication. Rather I thought it might be of interest to attempt to take some measure of its significance, both in terms of the historical perspective and looking forward. Before doing so, I should say something about my own stance in regard to the broad topic ‘reform of the legal profession’. This was the issue that first drew me to an academic career. When I left Cambridge in 1957, my intention had been to go to the Bar. But after a postgraduate year at Harvard Law School, I spent a year with the great Wall Street law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell. That experience changed everything. First, it led me to decide that the work I wanted to do was corporate law with a firm of City solicitors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Services Act 2007 (Claims Management Complaints) (Fees) (Amendment) Regulations 2017
    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE LEGAL SERVICES ACT 2007 (CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPLAINTS) (FEES) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS 2017 2017 No. 22 1. Introduction 1.1 This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. 1.2 This memorandum contains information for the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments. 2. Purpose of the instrument 2.1 These Regulations amend the Legal Services Act 2007 (Claims Management Complaints) (Fees) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3316) 1 (“the 2014 Regulations”). They amend the level of fees set by the 2014 Regulations and payable by authorised claims management companies, for the year beginning 1 April 2017 and subsequent years. 3. Matters of special interest to Parliament Matters of special interest to the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments 3.1 These Regulations decrease the fees that are to be charged to authorised claims management companies. This is to ensure that the Lord Chancellor can recover the total costs related to the Legal Ombudsman dealing with complaints about the claims industry, in the context of an over collection in fees to date, a reduction in the number of claims management companies and the Legal Ombudsman’s expected case volumes, and associated costs, in 2017-18. 3.2 We have considered the JCSI’s comments in its first report of 2014-15 with regard to the commencement of affirmative instruments and have taken the view that it is not applicable to this instrument. This is because this instrument amends the level of existing fees. As such, it does not impose a new duty and we do not anticipate that claims management companies will adopt a different pattern of behaviour in consequence of the decreased fee levels.
    [Show full text]
  • SRA Compensation Arrangements Review a Snapshot of the Current Arrangements
    SRA Compensation Arrangements Review A snapshot of the current arrangements Contents 1 The SRA's Compensation Arrangements Review - an overview ........ 3 2 The legal services market ...................................................... 6 3 What are the risks to consumers’ financial interests? ................. 10 4 How does the SRA manage these risks? ................................... 13 5 How does the SRA protect consumers when firms fail to meet the necessary standards? ............................................................................ 18 6 Funding the Compensation Fund ........................................... 27 7 How the SRA manages applications to the Compensation Fund ..... 30 8 Value of claims on the Compensation Fund ............................. 31 1 The SRA's Compensation Arrangements Review - an overview 1.1 The SRA and other legal services regulators1 are required to have in place appropriate professional indemnity insurance and compensation arrangements. These arrangements are there to provide consumers of legal services with protection from financial loss because of dishonesty, failure to account, fraud and dishonesty. 1.2 The SRA operates a compensation fund to help people who have lost money as a result of a law firm's dishonesty or failure to account for money received. 1.3 In recent years there have been significant changes in the way the legal services sector operates and is regulated. These changes include the separation of the representative and regulatory functions of professional bodies (such as the Law Society and Bar Council) which are approved regulators under the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA) and the liberalisation of legal services business structures permitting non-lawyer involvement in various forms. With the variety of services provided by law firms, the users of legal services have also changed significantly with different needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Professional De(Re)Regulation, Equality, and Inclusion, and the Contested Space of Professionalism Within the Legal Market in England and Wales
    LEGAL PROFESSIONAL DE(RE)REGULATION, EQUALITY, AND INCLUSION, AND THE CONTESTED SPACE OF PROFESSIONALISM WITHIN THE LEGAL MARKET IN ENGLAND AND WALES Lisa Webley* INTRODUCTION The legal profession in England and Wales is undergoing an unprecedented process of de(re)regulation1 as a result of the Legal Services Act 20072 (LSA 2007 or LSA). New types of legal businesses are emerging, and law graduates—who previously had not found a place within the regulated admitted legal profession—appear to be entering new facets of the legal marketplace, albeit often in precarious circumstances via circuitous routes.3 Moreover, globalization and the increased mobility of legal professionals around Europe and industrialized and industrializing common law countries are also reshaping sections of the legal market.4 * Professor of Empirical Legal Studies, University of Westminster. I am grateful for the contributions of all who organized, hosted, and contributed to The Challenge of Equity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession: An International and Comparative Perspective Colloquium held at Fordham University School of Law. For an overview of the colloquium, see Deborah L. Rhode, Foreword: Diversity in the Legal Profession: A Comparative Perspective, 83 FORDHAM L. REV. 2241 (2015). 1. I have used de(re)regulation to connote the confluence of a move to deregulate the legal profession, namely to remove much of its apparatus and power of self-regulation, and to reregulate the legal profession along market principles in accordance with New Labour’s Third Way regulatory policy, discussed later in the Article. 2. Legal Services Act, 2007, c. 29 (Eng.). 3. On legal business innovation, see Lisa Webley, When Is a Family Lawyer a Lawyer?, in DELIVERING FAMILY JUSTICE IN THE 21ST CENTURY (Mavis Maclean et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I - Preliminary
    PART I - PRELIMINARY 101. The Eighth Edition of the Code was adopted by the Bar Council on 18 September 2004 and came into force on 31st October 2004. 102. This Code includes the Annexes. 103. Amendments and additions to this Code may be made by Resolution of the Bar Standards Board Council which shall be operative upon such date as the Resolution shall appoint or if no such date is appointed on the later of: (a) the date of the Resolution; and (b) the date when approval of the amendment or addition, if required, is given by the Legal Services Board under Schedule 4 of the Legal Services Act 2007. Amendments and additions will be published from time to time in such manner as the Bar Council Standards Board may determine. General purpose of the Code 104. The general purpose of this Code is to provide the requirements for practice as a barrister and the rules and standards of conduct applicable to barristers which are appropriate in the interests of justice and in particular: (a) in relation to self-employed barristers to provide common and enforceable rules and standards which require them: (i) to be completely independent in conduct and in professional standing as sole practitioners; (ii) to act only as consultants instructed by solicitors and other approved persons (save where instructions can be properly dispensed with); (iii) to acknowledge a public obligation based on the paramount need for access to justice to act for any client in cases within their field of practice; (b) to make appropriate provision for : (i) barrister managers, employees and owners of recognised bodies; and (iv)(ii) employed barristers taking into account the fact that such barristers are employed to provide legal services to or on behalf of their employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Plowden, Master Treasurer of the Middle Temple
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 3 Number 1 Volume 3, January 1957, Number 1 Article 7 Edmund Plowden, Master Treasurer of the Middle Temple Richard O'Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Catholic Studies Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EDMUND PLOWDEN' MASTER TREASURER OF THE MIDDLE TEMPLE (1561-1570) RICHARD O'SULLIVAN D ENUO SURREXIT DOMUS: the Latin inscription high on the outside wall of this stately building announces and records the fact that in the year 1949, under the hand of our Royal Treasurer, Elizabeth the Queen, the Hall of the Middle Temple rose again and became once more the centre of our professional life and aspiration. To those who early in the war had seen the destruction of these walls and the shattering of the screen and the disappearance of the Minstrels' Gallery; and to those who saw the timbers of the roof ablaze upon a certain -midnight in March 1944, the restoration of Domus must seem something of a miracle. All these things naturally link our thought with the work and the memory of Edmund Plowden who, in the reign of an earlier Queen Elizabeth, devoted his years as Treasurer and as Master of the House to the building of this noble Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Services Act 2007 (The Law Society) (Modification of Functions) Order 2015
    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE LEGAL SERVICES ACT 2007 (THE LAW SOCIETY) (MODIFICATION OF FUNCTIONS) ORDER 2015 2015 No. 401 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. 2. Purpose of the Instrument 2.1 This instrument removes the requirement on a solicitor who is a sole practitioner to have to obtain an annual endorsement on their practising certificate and so establishes a single method of authorisation and regulation of all solicitors. This also has the effect of removing the differences in the way in which the regulatory arm of the Law Society, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), can take regulatory action where a difficulty arises with a sole practitioner. 3. Matters of special interest to the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments 3.1 None. 4. Legislative Context 4.1 The Legal Services Act 2007 (“the 2007 Act”) governs the regulation of legal services in England and Wales. Under the 2007 Act, only a person who is authorised by an approved regulator, or who is exempt from the requirement to be authorised, may carry on a reserved legal activity as defined in section 12 of that Act. Approved regulators are responsible for ensuring that the persons authorised by them act in a way that is consistent with the regulatory objectives set out in the 2007 Act. Part 2 of the 2007 Act established the Legal Services Board (“the LSB”) as the oversight regulator with responsibility for approved regulators. The approved regulators and the reserved legal activities in relation to which they are designated are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 4 to the 2007 Act and in designation orders made under Schedule 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Governance and Practising Fee Rules – Supplementary Consultation
    Internal Governance and Practising Fee Rules – Supplementary Consultation Bar Standards Board’s response Introduction 1. The Bar Standards Board (BSB) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the LSB‟s supplementary consultation on Internal Governance and Practising Fee Rules. 2. The BSB agrees with the new structure of principles, rules and guidance. This approach appears to create greater clarity and flexibility in the arrangements and is therefore welcome. The BSB also broadly agrees with the content of the principles, rules and guidance and therefore only believes it necessary to comment on a few discrete points. Definition of ‘lay person’ 3. The BSB notes that the LSB proposes to define a „lay person‟ as it is defined in the Legal Services Act 2007 („the Act‟), Schedule 1, paragraphs 2(4) and (5). These provisions prohibit anyone who, before the appointed day, is a barrister to be considered a „lay person‟. The LSB will be aware that individuals are called to the Bar (and therefore become barristers) after they have successfully completed the Bar Vocational Course (or Bar Professional Training Course from 1 September 2009) but before they have completed pupillage. A significant number of people have obtained the academic degree of „barrister‟, but have not undertaken pupillage and are therefore not entitled to practise as barristers. 4. The BSB believes that individuals who have been called to the Bar, but have never been entitled to practise as a barrister, should not be prohibited from being classified as a „lay person‟. There are many people who were called to the Bar but then pursued a career in public, financial or academic life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Literary Culture of the Inns of Court, 1572 - 1634
    LEGAL PLAY: THE LITERARY CULTURE OF THE INNS OF COURT, 1572 - 1634 by BRENT EDWARD WHETTED B.A. Baylor University, 1993 M.A. University of Durham, 1995 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of English We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1999 © Brent Whitted, 1999 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of j\S l/\ The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) 11 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the social politics of literary production at London's Inns of Court from 1572 to 1634. Pierre Bourdieu's concepts of cultural production are widened beyond his own French academic context so that the Inns may be located as institutions central to the formation of literary and, in particular, dramatic culture in early modern London. A significant part of Bourdieu's research has concerned the establishment of a foundation for a sociological analysis of literary works. The literary field, Bourdieu argues, is but one of many possible fields of cultural production—social networks of struggle over valued economic, cultural, scientific, or religious resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambition Access to Justice Rule of Law Innovation Public Interest Consumer
    access to justice rule of law innovation ambition public Fit for the interest Future Report of the Independent Review of Legal Services consumer Regulation in Scotland focus Esther A Roberton b Fit for the Future Contents Author’s Preface 2 Chapter 1 3 Executive summary and recommendations Chapter 2 10 Introduction and approach to the review Chapter 3 12 Landscape of the regulation of legal services in Scotland Chapter 4 19 Is there a case for strategic change? Chapter 5 30 Vision for the future of regulation of Scottish legal services Chapter 6 32 New regulatory model / the proposed regulator Chapter 7 36 Entry, standards, monitoring, complaints and redress for individuals and entities Chapter 8 45 Implications for the organisations in the existing regulatory framework Chapter 9 46 Cost of new regulatory arrangements Chapter 10 48 Economic contribution of legal services Chapter 11 50 Overview of recommendations Annex 1 53 Panel members Annex 2 55 Engagement during the review Bibliography 56 Fit for the Future 1 Author’s Preface In April 2017 I was invited by Annabelle Ewing MSP, the then Scottish Government Minister for Community Safety and Legal Affairs, to conduct an independent Review of the regulation of legal services in Scotland. This was a result of a commitment by the Scottish Government in response to a case for change made by the Law Society of Scotland and others. The stated purpose of the Review was to make The recommendations contained in the report are recommendations to reform and modernise the mine and I accept full responsibility for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of England Has Ratcheted up Its Public Discourse on the Topic of Diversity and Why It Is Important to Financial Services – As Illustrated by the Chart Below
    Over the past six months, the Bank of England has ratcheted up its public discourse on the topic of diversity and why it is important to financial services – as illustrated by the chart below. The Bank finds its voice on diversity Number of speeches on diversity given by Bank of England speakers over the past five years 12 3 3 1 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Source: New Financial analysis of Bank of England speeches At first glance, this flurry of activity appears to have come from a standing start, but in fact it has been building slowly over a number of years. In this short paper, we build a timeline showing how the Bank’s thinking on diversity and inclusion and its position as a role model is evolving, based on the Bank’s own publications and public announcements. We will highlight the key messages for the financial services industry to note. This paper asks: • How does diversity fit into the Bank’s remit? • Why is the Bank talking about diversity? • What is the Bank saying about diversity? • What should the financial services industry read into the Bank’s approach? Here are our top five takeaways: 1) The Bank has named diversity as a strategic priority across multiple strands, and it is encouraging the financial services industry to follow suit. 2) The Bank wants to be a role model for the wider financial services sector and exert its ‘soft power’ to influence firms. 3) The Bank focuses on diversity to reflect the public it serves, to build trust, and it believes diversity leads to more creative thinking and reduces the risks of groupthink and bias.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan
    7 0 -m -,1 1 9 WILLIS, Craig Dean, 1935- THE TUDORS AND THEIR TUTORS: A STUDY OF SIXTEENTH CENTURY ROYAL EDUCATION IN BRITAIN. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1969 Education, history University Microfilms. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan © Copyright by Craig Dean W illis 1970 THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE TUDORS AND THEIR- TUTORS: A STUDY OF SIXTEENTH CENTURY ROYAL EDUCATION IN BRITAIN DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University SY Craig Dean W illis, B.A., M.A. IHt- -tttt -H-H- The Ohio State U niversity 1969 Adviser t School of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To Dr. Robert B. Sutton, my major adviser, I owe a major debt of gratitude for his guidance, encouragement, and scholarly qualifies* I also wish to thank the members of the reading committee for their contribution; and in particular, I want to express appreciation to Dr. Richard J. Frankie and the late Dr. Earl Anderson for their professional and meaningful assistance. It is appropriate to thank the administrative officers at Ohio Wesleyan University for their encouragement and willingness to let me arrange my work around my graduate studies. Persons of particular help were Dr, Allan C. Ingraham, Dr. Elden T. Smith, Dr. Emerson C. Shuck, and Dr. Robert P. Lisensky. My family has been of invaluable assistance to me, and it is to them that I dedicate the study of the education of the Tudor family. My parents, J. Russell and Glenna A. W illis, have helped in many ways, both overt and subtle.
    [Show full text]