Breast Cancer in Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Breast Cancer in Australia Data in this report provide a comprehensive picture of breast cancer in Australia including how breast cancer rates differ by geographical area, socioeconomic Breast cancer in Australia status, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status and country of birth. an overview October 2012 CANCER SERIES Number 71 Breast cancer in Australia An overview Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Canberra Cat. no. CAN 67 The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare is a major national agency which provides reliable, regular and relevant information and statistics on Australia’s health and welfare. The Institute’s mission is authoritative information and statistics to promote better health and wellbeing. Cancer Australia is the Australian Government’s national cancer agency. Cancer Australia was established to benefit all Australians who are affected by cancer, their families and carers. Cancer Australia works to reduce the impact of cancer and improve the wellbeing of those diagnosed by ensuring that evidence informs cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment and supportive care. © Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2012 This product, excluding the AIHW logo, Commonwealth Coat of Arms and any material owned by a third party or protected by a trademark, has been released under a Creative Commons BY 3.0 (CC-BY 3.0) licence. Excluded material owned by third parties may include, for example, design and layout, images obtained under licence from third parties and signatures. We have made all reasonable efforts to identify and label material owned by third parties. You may distribute, remix and build upon this work. However, you must attribute the AIHW as the copyright holder of the work in compliance with our attribution policy available at <www.aihw.gov.au/copyright/>. The full terms and conditions of this licence are available at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/>. Enquiries relating to copyright should be addressed to the Head of the Communications, Media and Marketing Unit, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, GPO Box 570, Canberra ACT 2601. This publication is part of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare’s Cancer series. A complete list of the Institute’s publications is available from the Institute’s website <www.aihw.gov.au>. ISSN 1039-3307 ISBN 978-1-74249-355-8 Suggested citation Australian Institute of Health and Welfare & Cancer Australia 2012. Breast cancer in Australia: an overview. Cancer series no. 71. Cat. no. CAN 67. Canberra: AIHW. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Cancer Australia Board Chair Advisory Council Chair Dr Andrew Refshauge Dr William Glasson AO Director Chief Executive Officer David Kalisch Professor Helen Zorbas Any enquiries about or comments on this publication should be directed to: Communications, Media and Marketing Unit Australian Institute of Health and Welfare GPO Box 570 Canberra ACT 2601 Tel: (02) 6244 1032 Email: [email protected] Published by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Please note that there is the potential for minor revisions of data in this report. Please check the online version at <www.aihw.gov.au> for any amendments. Foreword Breast cancer in Australia: an overview presents the most up-to-date statistical information on breast cancer in Australia. The report documents key breast cancer statistics to provide researchers, health service providers and policy makers with the most relevant data to reduce the impact of breast cancer in Australia. This report represents the significant contributions and the continuing partnership of Cancer Australia, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, and the Australasian Association of Cancer Registries. Cancer Australia works to reduce the impact of cancer and improve the wellbeing of those diagnosed by ensuring that evidence informs cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment and supportive care. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare’s work informs and supports the development of policy and programs on Australia’s health and welfare through the provision of relevant, timely and high-quality information. The current report provides a nationwide snapshot of a major condition affecting a substantial number of Australians. It identifies the relationship between breast cancer incidence and mortality and geographical remoteness, socioeconomic status, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status, and country of birth. In addition, information on survival, prevalence, hospitalisations, expenditure, and the burden of disease from breast cancer indicates the impact of this disease on our population and health system. Importantly, the report identifies areas of significant change over time and provides projections for the future to assist in planning for services and patient needs. We would like to thank the staff of the various cancer registries and data repositories for their efforts in making these data available. We anticipate that the information contained in Breast cancer in Australia: an overview will be used extensively to further our goal of reducing the mortality from breast cancer and improving the wellbeing of all Australians living with the disease. Mr David Kalisch Professor Helen Zorbas Director CEO Australian Institute of Cancer Australia Health and Welfare Breast cancer in Australia: an overview iii Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................. vii Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... viii Symbols .................................................................................................................................................. x Summary .............................................................................................................................................. xi 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 What is breast cancer? ................................................................................................................... 1 What are the known risk factors for breast cancer? .................................................................. 2 Purpose and structure of this report............................................................................................ 3 Data interpretation ......................................................................................................................... 3 Data sources .................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Incidence of breast cancer ............................................................................................................ 6 About incidence of breast cancer ................................................................................................. 7 Incidence of breast cancer in females .......................................................................................... 7 Incidence of breast cancer in males ........................................................................................... 26 3 Mortality from breast cancer ..................................................................................................... 29 About mortality from breast cancer .......................................................................................... 30 Mortality of females from breast cancer ................................................................................... 30 Mortality of males from breast cancer ....................................................................................... 42 4 Survival after a diagnosis of breast cancer ............................................................................. 45 About survival after a diagnosis of breast cancer .................................................................... 46 Survival of females with breast cancer ...................................................................................... 47 What was the prospect of survival for males with breast cancer? ........................................ 57 5 Prevalence of breast cancer ........................................................................................................ 59 About prevalence of breast cancer ............................................................................................. 60 Prevalence of breast cancer in females ...................................................................................... 60 Prevalence of breast cancer in males ......................................................................................... 63 6 Burden of disease due to breast cancer ................................................................................... 65 About burden of disease due to breast cancer ......................................................................... 66 Burden of disease due to breast cancer in females .................................................................. 67 Burden of disease due to breast cancer in males ..................................................................... 70 7 Mammography............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Crime Prevention 2011 and Beyond – a Forum of Key Personnel from the Asia‐Pacific Region
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship SYDNEY INSTITUTE OF CRIMINOLOGY CRIME PREVENTION 2011 AND BEYOND – A FORUM OF KEY PERSONNEL FROM THE ASIA‐PACIFIC REGION Crime Prevention Programs/Initiatives Found to be Particularly Valuable and Relevant in Australia Prepared by: Garner Clancey1 Introductory Remarks I would like to commence by acknowledging and paying respect to the traditional owners of the land on which we meet; the Kaurna people. As we share our own knowledge, teaching, learning and research practices may we also pay respect to the knowledge embedded forever within the Aboriginal Custodianship of Country. I would also like to congratulate and thank the organisers of this event. Many members of the Australian Crime Prevention Council have worked tirelessly for many months to organise this wonderful and important Forum. While many people contribute to the hosting of an event of this nature, special mention must be made of the Organising Committee, which consists of: Master Peter Norman OAM, Chairman, ACPC Judge Andrew Wilson AM, Past President, ACPC Mr John Murray APM, Secretary and Public Officer ACPC Mr Adam Bodzioch, Treasurer ACPC Associate Professor Patrikeeff, Master of Kathleen Lumley College It is an honour to be given the opportunity to speak today and to share some thoughts on promising and valuable Australian crime prevention developments. There are a score of people involved in this event who could equally be providing this address. Many of the Australian representatives here today have been responsible for some of the successful initiatives which I will mention and who deserve considerable credit for the foresight, determination and perseverance to turn good ideas into effective practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Enterprise-Agreements/MCDONALDS- Study of the Relationship Between Social and Environmental Determinants AUSTRALIA-ENTERPRISE-AGREEMENT-2013.Pdf
    Anaf et al. Globalization and Health (2017) 13:7 DOI 10.1186/s12992-016-0230-4 RESEARCH Open Access Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: a case study on McDonald’s Australia Julia Anaf1* , Frances E. Baum1, Matt Fisher1, Elizabeth Harris2 and Sharon Friel3 Abstract Background: The practices of transnational corporations affect population health through production methods, shaping social determinants of health, or influencing the regulatory structures governing their activities. There has been limited research on community exposures to TNC policies and practices. Our pilot research used McDonald’s Australia to test methods for assessing the health impacts of one TNC within Australia. Methods: We adapted existing Health Impact Assessment methods to assess McDonald’s activities. Data identifying potential impacts were sourced through document analysis, including McDonald’s corporate literature; media analysis and semi-structured interviews. We commissioned a spatial and socioeconomic analysis of McDonald’s restaurants in Australia through Geographic Information System technology. The data was mapped against a corporate health impact assessment framework which included McDonald’s Australia’s political and business practices; products and marketing; workforce, social, environmental and economic conditions; and consumers’ health related behaviours. Results: We identified both positive and detrimental aspects of McDonald’s Australian operations across the scope of the CHIA framework. We found that McDonald’s outlets were
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Federal Government Online Public Consultation Trials: Local Learnings in E-Democracy
    ANZCA09 Communication, Creativity and Global Citizenship. Brisbane, July 2009 Australian federal government online public consultation trials: local learnings in e-democracy Jim Macnamara PhD University of Technology Sydney [email protected] Jim Macnamara PhD is Professor of Public Communication and Director of the Australian Centre for Public Communication at the University of Technology Sydney, posts he took up in 2007 after a 30-year career working in professional communication practice spanning journalism, public relations, advertising andmedia research. After co-founding and heading a leading communication agency for13 years, he founded the Asia Pacific office of a leading media research firm, CARMA International, and headed the firm for a decade before selling the company to Media Monitors in 2006. Jim holds a BA in journalism, media studies and literary studies and an MA by research in media studies from Deakin University and gained his PhD in media research from the University of Western Sydney. Abstract After its landslide victory in the 2007 Australian Federal election which was widely described as “the YouTube election”, the Rudd Labor government launched a series of trial public consultation blogs in 2008 as part of a commitment to e-democracy through the use of interactive Web 2.0 communication applications. At the same time, Barack Obama swept into power in the United States aided by Web 2.0 media including text messaging, blogs, YouTube, Twitter, and social networks such as Facebook which gained unprecedented levels of online political engagement. While e-democracy and e-government have been emerging concepts in many countries over more than a decade, these two experiences provide new information on the successes and challenges of online citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Force Outcomes for Australian Muslims Beth Cook Centre of Full Employment and Equity University of Newcastle
    Labour force outcomes for Australian Muslims Beth Cook Centre of Full Employment and Equity University of Newcastle Abstract: Evidence from multiple sources suggests that discrimination against Muslims exists in the Australian labour market. Compared to the non-Muslim labour force, employment outcomes may also be constrained due to lower levels of English language proficiency, difficulty obtaining recognition of overseas qualifications, cultural and religious issues, lack of familiarity with the Australian labour market, limited local work experience, job search skills and references. This paper uses 2006 Census data to provide insights into the labour force experience of Australian Muslims. The formal econometric modelling explores the characteristics associated with labour force participation and employment to determine whether the labour force experience of Australian Muslims differs from that of the entire population, after controlling for a range of individual and personal characteristics (supply-side) and regional factors (demand-side). The regression results demonstrate that Muslims are less likely to participate in the labour force and experience reduced employment prospects compared to the remainder of the population. This phenomenon may be associated with unobserved characteristics of individuals or may point to other explanations such as discrimination. 1. Introduction Migration has been integral to development in Australia and continues to be a major source of population and workforce growth. The Muslim population is a small but increasing proportion of the Australian population, growing from 22,300 in 1971 to 340,393 by 2006. The largest cohort is Australian–born (38 per cent), and the highest proportion of Muslims born overseas came from Lebanon (9 per cent), followed by Turkey (7 per cent), Afghanistan (5 per cent), Pakistan and Bangladesh (4 per cent) (ABS, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Resilience, Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity of an Inland Rural Town Prone to flooding: a Climate Change Adaptation Case Study of Charleville, Queensland, Australia
    Nat Hazards (2011) 59:699–723 DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9791-y ORIGINAL PAPER Resilience, vulnerability and adaptive capacity of an inland rural town prone to flooding: a climate change adaptation case study of Charleville, Queensland, Australia Diane U. Keogh • Armando Apan • Shahbaz Mushtaq • David King • Melanie Thomas Received: 5 July 2010 / Accepted: 15 March 2011 / Published online: 29 March 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract Australia is currently experiencing climate change effects in the form of higher temperatures and more frequent extreme events, such as floods. Floods are its costliest form of natural disaster accounting for losses estimated at over $300 million per annum. This article presents an historical case study of climate adaptation of an Australian town that is subject to frequent flooding. Charleville is a small, inland rural town in Queensland situated on an extensive flood plain, with no significant elevated areas available for relocation. The study aimed to gain an understanding of the vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity of this community by studying the 2008 flood event. Structured ques- tionnaires were administered in personal interviews in February 2010 to householders and businesses affected by the 2008 flood, and to institutional personnel servicing the region (n = 91). Data were analysed using appropriate quantitative and qualitative techniques. Charleville was found to be staunchly resilient, with high levels of organisation and cooperation, and well-developed and functioning social and institutional networks. The community is committed to remaining in the town despite the prospect of continued future flooding. Its main vulnerabilities included low levels of insurance cover (32% residents, 43% businesses had cover) and limited monitoring data to warn of impending flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Schoolteachers' Perceptions of News Coverage of Education Abstract
    Shine, K. 2018. ‘Everything is negative’: Schoolteachers’ perceptions of news coverage of education. Journalism. ‘Everything is negative’: Schoolteachers’ perceptions of news coverage of education Abstract Although education is a staple of news coverage, the reporting of school-based education rarely receives attention within journalism and media studies. Scholars in other areas, however, have argued that news coverage of education is highly influential and should be examined. The research consensus has been that education coverage is mostly negative and further, that teachers are frequently portrayed as to blame for perceived shortcomings in school systems. Such coverage is said to concern and affect schoolteachers. However, to date, very few studies have canvassed teachers’ attitudes towards the reporting of education. This article contributes to this under-researched area by providing the results of a series of interviews with 25 Australian schoolteachers and principals about their perceptions of news coverage of education. The vast majority of the teachers interviewed considered news about schooling and teachers to be predominantly, and unfairly, critical. They described news reporting of education as frequently inaccurate and generally superficial. Many expressed a distrust of journalists and were wary about being interviewed. The implications of these findings are discussed and recommendations for journalism practice and journalism education outlined. Keywords: news influence, education, credibility, public opinion, journalism (profession) Introduction News about school-based (K-12) education appears regularly in media coverage 1 around the world. Perceived to be of interest to the high numbers of parents among media audiences, education has, in recent years, “grown in prestige and editorial importance to become one of the top three or four areas of news coverage”, according to British researchers (Hargreaves et al., 2007: 5).
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Australia's Population Policy for Future Greenhouse Gas
    bs_bs_banner Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 249–265 doi: 10.1002/app5.135 Original Article Implications of Australia’s Population Policy for Future Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets Corey J. A. Bradshaw* and Barry W. Brook Abstract 1. Introduction Australia’s high per capita emissions rates Australia is the world’s sixth-largest country makes it is a major emitter of anthropogenic (land area = 7.69 million km2), yet it has a greenhouse gases, but its low intrinsic growth 2014 human population of only 23.5 million, rate means that future increases in population making it the 51st largest national population size will be dictated by net overseas immigra- in the world (worldbank.org), or approxi- tion. We constructed matrix models and mately 0.3 per cent of the planet’stotalhuman projected the population to 2100 under six dif- population. Despite this relatively small popu- ferent immigration scenarios. A constant 1 per lation, Australia has one of the highest cent proportional immigration scenario would per capita greenhouse gas emissions rates in result in 53 million people by 2100, producing the Organisation for Economic Co-operation 30.7 Gt CO2-e over that interval. Zero net im- and Development, because of its heavy migration would achieve approximate popula- reliance on coal-fired and gas-fired electricity tion stability by mid-century and produce 24.1 generation, an expansive fossil-fuelled transport Gt CO2-e. Achieving a 27 per cent reduction in network, and large agricultural sector annual emissions by 2030 would require a 1.5- (International Energy Agency 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism? Class and Colonial Legacies in Australia Chris Gibson University of Wollongong, [email protected]
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2013 "Muting" neoliberalism? Class and colonial legacies in Australia Chris Gibson University of Wollongong, [email protected] Publication Details Gibson, C. (2013). "Muting" neoliberalism? Class and colonial legacies in Australia. Human Geography: a new radical journal, 6 (2), 54-68. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] "Muting" neoliberalism? Class and colonial legacies in Australia Abstract Australian governments of left nda right persuasions have seemingly embraced elements of the neoliberal agenda, as in many other parts of the world; but exactly how deeply these have been enacted, and how transformative they have been, must be understood in relation to key colonial, geographical and cultural inheritances. These inheritances include the hegemony of central government stewardship of the economy (essential in a colonized, sparsely populated continent of almost unmanageable scale), a long tradition of social democratic regulation, and cultural expectations of socio-spatial equality. Neoliberal policy projects have been "muted" by on-going equality claims, and some progressive "wins" in the social democratic mould have been forthcoming, even while governments have espoused the ascendancy of the market. Nevertheless, neoliberal policy moves have been most starkly felt in worsening income inequalities - where the evidence is unambiguous of a direct threat to the Australian egalitarian ethos. Keywords neoliberalism, class, colonial, legacies, muting, australia Disciplines Medicine and Health Sciences | Social and Behavioral Sciences Publication Details Gibson, C. (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Inaugural Progress Report Contents L… a Ti Message from the Chair
    al… tenti ull po their f to reach Because every child deserves every chance Every Child Central Queensland Inaugural Progress Report Contents l… a ti Message from the Chair .................7 Children’s development ..................24 n Disadvantage and social exclusion .........26 te o About Every Child Central Queensland ....8 Household characteristics ................27 p ll Vision .................................10 Domestic and family violence .............27 u Scope ................................10 Child Protection Orders ..................28 f ir We Value ..............................11 School readiness and e Governance ...........................12 educational attainment ...................29 h t · Community Leadership Board .........12 Teenage pregnancy .....................30 h · Governance Structure ................13 Youth unemployment ....................31 ac e · Leadership Alliance Group ............14 Social and emotional wellbeing ............31 r · Core Organisation ...................14 to e · Program Coordination Team ...........14 Our Communities. 33 nc · Outcome Action Groups. 15 a · Project Teams ......................15 Areas of focus .........................36 ch y · General participation .................15 The Big 5 ..............................37 er v What is Social Innovation? ..............16 Next phase ...........................38 e s Actions for the year .....................39 ve er Why a Collective Impact Approach? ......18 Time-line ..............................39 es Benefits and challenges ..................40
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadfiles/Walkability%20Toolkit Email.Pdf>
    Health and the environment A compilation of evidence March 2011 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Canberra Cat. no. PHE 136 The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare is Australia’s national health and welfare statistics and information agency. The Institute’s mission is better information and statistics for better health and wellbeing. © Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Head of the Communications, Media and Marketing Unit, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, GPO Box 570, Canberra ACT 2601. A complete list of the Institute’s publications is available from the Institute’s website <www.aihw.gov.au>. ISBN 978-1-74249-129-5 Suggested citation Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2011. Health and the environment: a compilation of evidence. Cat. no. PHE 136. Canberra: AIHW. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Board Chair Hon. Peter Collins, AM, QC Director David Kalisch Any enquiries about or comments on this publication should be directed to: Communications, Media and Marketing Unit Australian Institute of Health and Welfare GPO Box 570 Canberra ACT 2601 Phone: (02) 6244 1032 Email: [email protected] Published by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Printed by Bluestar Print Please note that there is the potential for minor revisions of data in this report. Please check the online version at <www.aihw.gov.au> for any amendments.
    [Show full text]
  • Horse Owners' Biosecurity Practices Following the First Equine Influenza Outbreak in Australia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published in [Prev Vet Med] on [4 September 2011], available online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587711002455 Cite as: Schemann, K., Taylor, M. R., Toribio, J. A., & Dhand, N. K. (2011). Horse owners' biosecurity practices following the first equine influenza outbreak in Australia. Prev Vet Med, 102(4), 304-314. Available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587711002455 (paywalled) Horse owners’ biosecurity practices following the first equine influenza outbreak in Australia K Schemanna*, MR Taylorb, J-ALML Toribioa and NK Dhanda, a Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, 425 Werombi Road, Camden 2570, NSW, Australia. b School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797 Penrith South DC 1797, NSW, Australia. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 90367736; fax: +61 2 93511693. E-mail address: [email protected] (K. Schemann) Abstract A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 759 Australian horse owners to determine their biosecurity practices and perceptions one year after the 2007 equine influenza outbreak and to investigate the factors influencing these perceptions and practices. A web link to an online questionnaire was sent to 1224 horse owners as a follow-up to a previous study to obtain information about biosecurity perceptions and practices, impacts of the 2007 EI outbreak, demographic information and information about horse industry involvement. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with poor biosecurity practices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Economy in Australia: a Research Agenda
    The social economy in Australia: A research agenda Jo Barraket 1 & Michael Crozier 2 Abstract This paper examines the idea of social economy in an era of network governance. In particular, it focuses on recent approaches to social inclusion involving strategic partnerships that combine social and economic objectives. The paper outlines some key themes in both the social economy and network governance literatures, linking them together through the issue of cross-sector joint action. The intention is to highlight the conceptual and empirical challenges this area of research poses. In this regard, we propose some preliminary questions and tentative responses as part of a broader program of research which involves conceptualising and mapping the Australian social economy. Keywords Social economy; social inclusion; third sector; network governance; 1 Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies, Queensland University of Technology. Email: [email protected] 2 School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne. Email: [email protected] 1 Introduction Current thinking on social inclusion and exclusion has brought to the fore the inter- relatedness of factors involved in disadvantage. Social exclusion is now widely understood as a ‘joined-up’ problem, as a confluence of multiple and interacting factors and effects. As a consequence, ‘networked’ and ‘joined up’ strategies have become prominent in attempts to address the issue by government, and between government, business, and civil society. In public policy, this has seen a growing emphasis on the importance of building social capital and trust for the development of social inclusion strategies, and enriching civil society more generally. The involvement of the third sector—non-profit, cooperative and mutual organizations—is a key aspect of these strategies in policy reforms both internationally and in Australia (see Reddel 2004; Kelly 2007).
    [Show full text]